Revaluation of Activity CON2

Hello Team,
I have a small doubt about the Revaluation of Activity.  I have red in one of the thread "Before the final confirmation, Activity types are re valuated"
Is this Revaluation of the activity is belongs to Moth end activity..?
If it is a month end activity, how how come before the final confirmation activity types are re-valuated.
Regards
Raj

Hi Raj,
Activity price calculation is a period end activity. As we dont know the actual activity price in the middle of the month, confirmation of activities will pick up plan activity rate. (assume 2 Hrs * 10$ - plan activity price = 20$ will be updated while confirming the activities)
By month end, all the cost related to the activity will be posted and when you calculate "Actual activity price calculation through KSII" you will get the actual activity price.
To apply the calculated actual activity price, we need to run the revaluation of order through KON2/MFN1 as part of period end activity.
BR, Srinivas Salpala

Similar Messages

  • Configuration needed for setting revaluation of activity type rates

    Hi,
    I'm not sure about the obligatory settings I should make in order to configure revaluation of activity type rates.
    I know that I have to set sth in Plan version and that I have to fill the Activity Type master data in a different way than if I used them without revaluation.
    Can you tell me about the settings I should make?
    Thanks and regards,
    Karol

    Hi Karol
    Yes u r right u need to first set in plan version and after that its the client's discipline on transaction entry that drives this requirement.
    1)  If the transaction data is not posted correctly then activity hours will be vague and distorts the price. 
    2)  You can do manual activity posting but that does solve the purpose. 
    3)  Also u can correct activity hours posted for all orders in the system during month end, this also is a huge activity depending on the number of orders
    4)  Now if u wish to do price calculation thru system u need to decide on two aspects
    One - plan ur costs for both activity dependent and activity independent
    If your cost center has more than one activity being performed u need to do either cost splitting or enter equivalence numbers while doing activity planning
    5)  If u wish to hve prices calcualted by system, then during month end u need to run actual cost splitting and then do actual price calculation
    6)  Then u need to revaluate all your orders with actual activity prices
    Hope the above clarifies - do assign points as a way to say thanks

  • Revaluation of activity prices in CO

    Did anybody tell me about what it mean by revaluation of activity prices??
    Is revaluation is necessory at the period end??
    If we want dont want revaluation then what should be do???

    Hi ranjeet,
    The activity prices for each activity should be regularly updated by costing person so that the material valuation can be corrected over the changing period.
    Due to variances in raw material's price it may be the case that one raw material may have diff. price range in different period.So for correct valuation of material prices at each period end, it should be changed as per the costing dept's need.
    If you dont want to maintain this, you have to go for the <b>Standard price</b> for the material other than Variable price.
    Reward if it hepls.
    Regards,
    Sunny

  • Revaluation of activity prices.

    Did anybody tell me about what it mean by revaluation of activity prices??
    Is revaluation is necessory at the period end??
    If we want dont want revaluation then what should be do???

    Hi
    When KSII is run system calculates actual activity prices for the period.  This is done at the month end after cost center accounting is completed, all repostings and corrections are done in cost centers and after activity quantities recorded thru production orders are evaluated and corrected
    During the month activity cost on the production order is calculated depending on the activity valuation strategy considered for PP actual production order.  After Price calculation is done, as a month end process Revaluation of orders is also done.  Systems posts addtional entries for the change in activity costs with old price and new prices. 
    Hope the above clarifies - Pls assign points as a way to say thanks

  • Revaluation of Activity type is not getting updated in Production Order

    Hi,
    I have run KSII , for actual activity price calculation. After this , the revalution of production orders was done.
    But I am not finding any entry in Production order with a value of variance between Actual Price and Plan Price of the Activity type.
    It sould come in the production order.
    What can be the reason?
    In OKEQ, for the Version '0' and the fiscal year, Revaluation has the entry ' 1.Own Business Transaction'. I hope this is correct.
    But still the revalaution line item is not showing in Production Order.
    Please help.
    regards
    Kamlesh

    Hi Paolo,
    Yes, MFN1 ran perfectly and I am also able to see the details in the screen.
    My concern is, this revaluation should also have affect on Production order, thats what not happening.
    Or let me know where can I see the affect of revaluation on Production orders.
    regards
    Kami

  • Activity Costs Revaluation Using Actual Price

    Hi,
    Since we can revaluate the activity costs at actual price in the product costing module itself using t.code MFN1, why SAP has provided another option to revaluate acticvity consumption at actual price in the material ledger multi level price determination?
    What is the difference between the both? If i had used MFN1, do i still have to use the revaluation of activity costs provided in the material ledger?

    Hi,
    However don't you think if the production order activity cost has been revaluated at actuals in the production order then during settlement it will carry the activity actual costs which will be shown in material ledger receipts category with the same actuals value for the activity costs.
    So why should i be revaluating the activity costs again with actual activity price in material ledger once again? It sounds like a duplicate work to me under this scenario....

  • Manual actual  price of activity kbk6

    Dear Experts,
    I always used splitting-actual activity price calculation and revaluation of activity.
    but How to calculate and charged  Actual activity price through KBK6 from production order.
    ie - standard cost of Power is 80 (credit side of cost center) ,power  qty 10 and standard rate 8 rs at the time of production order confirmation and Actual Booking of Power is 100 rs and actual rate 100/10=10rs. so my production orders are charged less with rs 20.
    i have maintained rs 10 in kbk6 after that shall i execute CON2 or MBN1 for charging actual rate from production order then followed by Variance and settlement.
    M i missing something or need to take care something?.
    regards
    RR

    Hi
    After maintaining actual activity price manually, you need to follow the same process of CON2
    However, you may need to apply Note 732421 - Revaluation: Manual prices are incorrectly revaluated
    br, Ajay M

  • How to calculate actual activity price using cost center balance

    I have a problem,the case is that: i have two pro.order. orderA settlement to cost center M; orderB is a standard pro.ord,and the work center of orderB link to cost center M. when i calculate the actual activity revaluation.the activity price update the PRO.ordA and B,and the cost center is zero.
    when i settlement the order A,the cost center M is not balance,so i must calculate the actual activity revaluation again.
    now,i want to calculate the actual activity revaluation from the cost center's balance,not the Dredit balance.so how can i calculate the actual activity revaluation

    did you also assigned the cost centre to splitting structure?
    what is not working? the cost are equally distributed on both activities?

  • WIP revaluation in AVR

    HI Guys,
    1. when WIP revaluation is activated in CKMLCP, whether it will get automatically activated in CKMLCPAVR also that means whether the WIP will be revaluated in CKMLCPAVR run also.
    2. When I want to do the "determine the actual price " step in CKMLCPAVR, whether i need to create a seaprate delta actual version by referrencing 0 version.
    Please clarify the above doubts if possible
    Best Regards
    P

    HI Udo,
    Thanks for the quick response and help.
    But in between you have metioned that
    "But I am not sure that you really need that note: When you execute the step to calculate the activity prices in CKMLCPAVR you would have cumulated actual prices in the ML-Delta version and as far as I see that would match with what you require"
    The scenario is
    1. we haev fixed cost denoted by activity and so variable cost.
    2. every month normal template allocation with variable cost is going on and for fixed cost the price is zero or nil.
    3. we run the priod end closing for orders
    4. run the CKMLCP
    Now.. to absorb the fixed cost
    at the year end after running the 3rd step
    I am planning to run CKMLCPAVR with actual price of the activity( both for fixed cost as well as variable cost) but in same version " 0".
    So due to think it should work ?
    actually I am in the verge of comepleting the testing cycle but there are lot of garbage in the system in older periods . So I am working on cleaning the system and doign the period end closing for the old periods.
    If I am  logically ok with above process, please throw some light on that.
    Best Regards
    Prabhat Kumar

  • Accounting for variation of activity/price

    We use transaction KP26 to change the activity’s prices.
    Then we transfer the activity cost in accounting with CAT7.
    If we change the prices of past months, is there a transaction that generate an accounting document for the cost difference due to the price variation?
    Regards.

    Hi
    There is an activity called revaluation of activity prices, you need to run this every month end so that you get actuals price and not planned price. However you need have the actual price calculation run before this using KSII transaction.
    Use transaction CJN1 to revalaute project, KON1 to revaluate orders.
    ANAND

  • Closing Entry Run without "Revaluation of Consumption Checkbox"

    Hi gurus,
    I have a very important problem and I need to close the period as soon as possible.
    I did closing entry run for an individual material without the Revaluation of Consumption checkbox. CO object revaluation is active for the consumption alternatives (Both for CO and FI revaluation). We see normal postings (with checbox filled) with profitability (CO-PA) object. 
    What are the postings that ML did in both FI side and CO side. When I looked at the posting price differences are distributed for each single profitability(CO-PA) object in CKM3 view. Also related amount sent to ending inventory (both in CKM3 view and with FI stock account postings).
    Under this conditions, COGS account are posted still with standard price rather then actual price. Am I right. So, for the correct result, should we post the related amount (actual - std price difference X sold amount) to the COGS account?
    On the other hand, how will be the CO-PA posting at the end of the period. As you know the actual prices are taken from ML and COGS accounts are posted with standard prices. Therefore, CO-PA COGS amount will not be actual amount. Am I right.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ahmet

    Hi,
    I mean system has two different kind of postings, one of that is FI posting (legal) and the other is CO posting with cost elements (statistical like cost allocations). I run the step Consumption revaluation in CKMLCP and price differences distributed in CKM3 view. But as you know that actual postings are done in the closing entry step and I do not check the box of revaluate consumption in the closing entry parameters, actually price differences are not posted to consumptions rather CKM3 view changed.
    Therefore, COGS account posted with srtandart prices rather than actual prices because we did not checked the "revaluate consumption box". In order to fix the situation (actual-standart differences) should we post the related price difference amount to the COGS account.
    Ahmet

  • Revaluation of  manual planning KP95

    H Experts
    Is KP95 can be used for revaluting any plan data of WBS or only manual plan data (Which is planned through CJ40)
    Or this is intended for revaluation of activity type plans.
    Please give more details on this.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi for revaluation in projects you use
    - CJP1 (Create)
    - CJP2 (Change)
    - CJP3 (Display)
    - CJP4 (Delete)
    To create revaluations data
    and to to execute the revaluation you use:
    - CJPU (Execute)
    Best regards
    Jose Marin

  • Equivalence no. in kp26

    Dear experts,
    I will planning to do revaluation of actual activities prices at actual price but some time I am facing error at actual activities price.Equivalence no. is zero for activities type and cost center but equivalence no. is already maintained for the same in KP26.
    Then need to change equivalence no. from 1 to some other no. like 11. then it will works.
    But i am not calculating actual price on the basis of equivalence no.What will happen if i will delete equivalence no. from KP26(maintained it blank).
    Whether this will impact to my revaluation of activity or from where equivalence no. is coming in KP26 by default as 1.
    regards
    RR

    Hi Raman,
    Actual Activity price calculation is done on the basis of actual quantity of activity confirmed by production people through co11n and captured in your cost center and splitting of cost on the such basis.
    Equivalence no. comes into play when the system can't find the quantity confirmed.
    Regards,
    Divraj

  • Accounting Entries in PP

    Hi all
    I need a/cing entries that get posted in Various stages in PP
    Ur ans is helpful to me
    Thanx
    Srinivasa Rao

    Hi Srinivas,
    Following are the major stages and accounting entries.
    1) Preliminery Costing
        Preliminery Costing automatically gets created.
        There is no accounting entries.
    2) Simultaneous Costing:
        In this stage, the goods are issued to the Manufacturing Order. The Manufacturing Order is debited with the sum of  prices and quantities and the respective inventory accounts are credited. The movement type 261 is being used.
    Through the confirmation of activities, the Manufacturing orders are debited with the sum of prices of activities and quantities and the Cost centers are credited. Here , there shall be no finance entries whereas controlling and profit center accounting shall be getting the entries.
    Goods receipt of the FG or SFG happens, by crediting the Manufacturing order and debiting the inventory accounts.
    3) Final costing:
    At the end of the period this process shall be undertaken.
    Revaluatoin of Activity price
    If there is any need to revalue the activity price, it shall be done. This helps in absorbing the cost centers fully. Here, the accouting entries shall be, Manufacturing Orders shall either be debited or credited and the Cost Centers shall be credited or debited as the case be.
    Actual Overhead Calculation
    Then, actual overhead shall be done so as to bring in actual costs of overheads.
    WIP Calcualtion
    After this WIP is calculated. In this case, the costs incurred over and above the goods receipt shall be computed as the cost of WIP when the  Manufacturing order is not fully delivered or the status of technically complete is not updated. Here, there is only computation and no accounting entries.
    Variance Calculation
    When we undertake this calculation, the system computes the difference between the debits and credits for the Manufacturing orders which are fully delivered or technically completed.  Here also, there shall be no accounting entries.
    Settlement
    Here, accounting entries happens for both the WIP Calculation and variance calculation. In the case of WIP Change account is credited and WIP Inventory account is debited.  For fully delivered or technically complete, Manufacturing Orders are credited or debited and Production variance account shall be debited or credited. Variance gets posted in Finance, Controlling, Profit Center Accounting and Profitability Analysis as well. In the case of Profitability Analysis, the variances are segreated into category wise.
    Here, I have used umbrella term 'Manufacturing Order' for Production order, Process Order and Product cost Collector.
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers!

  • Closing month - Previous periods - WIP

    Hi people,
    We are try to make closing month (CKMLCP) in previous periods.
    For ths necessity, we have to execute the transactions:
    CKMH: Single Level Material Price Determination and put in the transacction "MUST_SETTLE"
    CKMI: Material Ledger Closing Entries and put in the transaction: "MUST_CLOSE"
    But, when we execute the transaction CKMI with MUST_CLOSE, the system shows us:
    Execute WiP Price determination for material
    Question: Whats is the transaction we have to execute WIP in previous month as the transaction related and what´s the transactio we have to put as MUST_SETTLE or MUST_CLOSE.
    Thanks,
    Rosana.

    Hi.
    I dont fully understand your question.
    1. Do you have WIP Revaluation Active?
    2. Indeed, you must run all the steps in the ML Close, not only the single level (CKMH) and the Posting (CKMI). You see all the steps in CKMLCP cockpit. And can use the MUST_xx in this tcode,
    I guess your problem is because you have the WIP Revaluation functionality active. This step dont have tcode, but you can use se38/WIP_PRICE_DETERMINATION
    Check the OSS of the previous post for more details.
    Arturo.

Maybe you are looking for