Roaming disabled bug on 4G and LTE

I have an iPhone 6 and my phone operator (TIM Italy) billed me 7 times for connections I made abroad. The data transfer was minimal, just a couple of MBs in total, but the bill was high as I pay a fixed price for each connection done abroad, regardless of the data transfer amount (until a certain cap is reached).
I have the roaming option disabled on my iPhone so I didn't expect any data transfer to occur.
I tried to fill a claim to get the money back, but my operation replied saying that they have proof that connection happened and they are saying it is a pretty common case with iPhone 6 and 4G/LTE networks. They are saying the software roaming lock works well for EDGE and 3G, but for 4G/LTE it sometimes allows some data to be transferred, thus the billing occurs as they can't distinguish voluntary from involuntary data transfers.
My operator is suggesting disabling 4G/LTE to avoid running in the same issue again, but it is not an acceptable solution to me as I live on the borders between Switzerland and Italy and I often fall by chance under Swiss network coverage so either I disable 4G forever or I have to accept with those very high bills.
Is Apple aware of this bug? If this is a software bug can I ask Apple to refund my bills?

Stereodark
I see that your Question has languished for some period of time without response. You have posted your issue in Using Apple Support Communities whose topic is 'How to use this forum software's interface, features and/or how to find what you wish'. It is a relatively low traffic and inappropriate forum for your problem. I will ask our Hosts to move it to " Using iPhone " where it may get a more rapid response from your fellow users.
I must say, that your situation (on the border) may be insurmountable with the recommended workaround.
In answer to your Questions...
If TIM Italy is "...saying the software roaming lock works well for EDGE and 3G, but for 4G/LTE it sometimes allows some data to be transferred,...", then this seems like it must be what we refer to as a "known issue". Apple seldom (if ever) uses the term "bug", no do they often offer workarounds (as the issue is likely unaddressable by the user with a "Setting" or such).
As for the refund? ? ? ?
You don't state that you have spoken with Apple at all (?) see the center column > http://www.apple.com/it/contact/
best luck & we await any updates
ÇÇÇ

Similar Messages

Why is the message app popping up on my mac when everything has been disabled on my iphone and mac, I use my phone for messages, not my mac. Is this a bug? I just want it off my mac forever!

Why is the message app popping up on my mac when everything has been disabled on my iphone and mac as per the instructions all over this forum, I use my phone for messages, not my mac. Is this a bug? I just want it off my mac forever!
Have disabled in Messages > preferences on the Mac
imessage is disabled on my iphone
Same goes for Safari which pops up on the mac when I open it on my iphone, how can I disable it all?

Thanks but have signed out, disabled and nothing.
It's Yosemite not Mavericks.
What it won't let me do is delete the account as the - button is greyed
out.
It won't let me delete the app from the OS
On Monday, February 2, 2015, Apple Support Communities Updates <

IOS7 wifi and LTE speed very slow.

iOS7 wifi and LTE speed very slow compared to iOS6. This was proven with Safari and using speed test app.

I have exactly the same problem symptom ever since installing iOS7. Toggling the FaceTime or the LTE settings alleviated the problem until I installed the latest version on IOS (7.0.4- 11B554a). Now the bug is permanent, a Network Reset will not work anymore, a System Reset will work only for the first execution of Speedtest.
Looks like the network software is throttling LTE speed to the minimum (.50 Mbps) up/download speed no matter what. Now unlimited Data means nothing, maybe AT&T wants me to go to Verizon or Tmobile.
I reported this problem to AT&T Sept 26 when I first installed IOS7, they told me there was no problem really that I needed to wait for the LTE network congestion to go away...? Since I found a circumvention by toggling LTE I did not pursued the problem...
After reporting the problem again this morning, they sent me to the AT&T store to change the SIM card.... I will try this and report back if it fixes the problem... Although I doubt it will fix anything but burn and extra hour of my day. The AT&T rep said that if the new SIM card doesn't fix the problem I need to go to Apple for them to give me a new Iphone....???? I guess there are many iPhones gone bad after installing IOS7 (sarcasm).
If you have this same problem, please post here so that I am able to get back to AT&T with some leverage to get them to remove the choking of LTE. Basically, if everyone accepts the new low speeds, then, unlimited data is no longer a problem for this phone company.

Nokia 5320 XM firmware bugs concerning date and al...

Hello!
Although already having twice sent in my Nokia 5320 XpressMusic for repair, I'm still suffering from severe firmware bugs concerning date and alarm of the device. Here some information on when and how the bugs are showing themselves:
Settings: A different weekly alarm is programmed for each day of the week. The phone is being switched off for the night.
The programmed alarm is being run correctly by the phone. The phone is being switched on after having disabled the alarm.
Some time later the date changes to four or five days in the future. Moreover the phone starts to ring for the day the date has changed to. Often it's not ringing at the time that has been programmed for that day, even though pretending to do so.
Example:
9:45 on Sunday: phone is correctly ringing at the programmed time.
10:15 on Sunday: phone is incorrectly ringing again pretending it was Friday 7:50
the clock remains unchanged, however the date has changed automatically for five days
Linked to this error, there seem to exist similar problems with date and snooze-function already mentioned on these forums:
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=145323
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=144139
/discussions/board/message?board.id=smartphones&message.id=143893
As I mentioned above, I already sent my phone in twice, however I always got it back with the mention: repaired on guarantee. To me, this seems rather disgraceful for Nokia. I sincerely hope, that, if necessary with the pressure of other users being concerned as well, we arrive to get a phone that is really working as one could await it from the leader in mobile phone production!
I hope we will be informed soon about when there will be a firmware update!
Thanks for your replies!
Regards,
Lorenz

Have the same problem, as I already mentioned in my posts too. But unfortunatly no reply from Nokia either. Seems they really don't care about it. It would be at least apropriate, that they at least announce time of new firmware and note if they will fix this problem with it.
But no replay from them I contacted local nokia dealer in Slovenia, but they just say they can not help. And that we must wait for new firmware.
Now I wonder, when it should came out ?! I am sick of this trouble with my phone. and as you said, I am also turning off my phone since I want my battery to last longer. so this bug must be fixed.
Nokia team, anyone?!?!?

Sudden data roaming charge to phone with data roaming disabled on Motorola droid

I have used a droid for the 2 years plus that I have been with Verizon. I work for a cruise line on a ship. I am in port every 8 days and use my phone on that day. I leave my data roaming TURNED OFF at ALL times because I am aware that charges for this are very high when roaming on a ship (I have worked on cruise ships for over 12 years).
For two years I have used my phone in the US port that serves as my home port (Ft Lauderdale this year) and when I get back on board I put the phone in my pocket, forget about it until I get to my room at which time I put it on my desk and it stays there until I either turn it off or until the battery dies. I have NEVER been charged data roaming fees in the past two years until the past month. I have made NO CHANGE whatsoever in the way my phone is set up.
This month I received over 500 dollars in data roaming charges which I am being told are 'legitimate charges' because apparently data was pushed to my phone while it was on the ship sailing out of Ft. Lauderdale with data roaming DISABLED. This happened every 8 days (the debark/embark day for my ship) for an entire month billing period. Customer Service reps have looked and determined that the data is being pushed to my phone late in the day as my ship sails out of Ft. Lauderdale.
I initially called Verizon on Nov 30th (after receiving messages on the 29th warning me that I was being charged higher than normal data roaming charges) and was told that I was indeed setting my phone up correctly to prevent Data Roaming charges and an investigation was started. I was not told to change anything about the way my phone was set up, as long as in fact Data Roaming was disabled. On December 4th my phone again had data pushed to it as the ship sailed away from Florida. I called on the 5th of December and was told to turn ALL DATA off on my phone when getting on a ship. By this time the entire 500 plus dollar amount of data had somehow been pushed to my phone. (I have no idea what the heck it is...I didn't use it for anything).
Since this has happened I have called multiple customer service reps, all of whom have been very nice on the phone and promised to look into the matter and call me back. No one has ever called back. Twice supervisors have submitted my data roaming charges to be removed only to be turned down by someone saying the charges are correct and that data was sent to my phone and thus the charges are legitimate. The point that I make over and over again is that I wasn't told by anyone from Verizon to turn ALL DATA off when going on a ship until December 5th, and further that my usage pattern with the phone during the past month is EXACTLY the same as it has been over the past two plus years when I WAS NOT being charged for data roaming. By December 5th all the charges had already accrued so following directions to TURN ALL DATA OFF when on the ship didn't affect my outstanding charges. (Further, I called Motorola and a tech there told me that having data roaming disabled on the phone should be sufficient to prevent ANY data from being received by the phone while it is roaming...this, he told me, is exactly why the phone has that option as well as the ability using a completely different button to turn on and off ALL data.
I did speak with another Customer Service rep today who told me that she had resolved the issue and that an adjustment would be made to my bill within the next 48 hours. I asked her if this was contingent on approval from somewhere up the line and she said no, that she understood what I was saying and plead my case successfully to a supervisor and the adjustment was being made.
If the adjustment is in fact made I will repost here stating that. If it isn't made then it will be the 6th phone call I have made to Customer Service that hasn't resulted in taking care of an issue that is in NO WAY my fault nor is it my responsibility in my opinion. I set my phone up NOT to receive data while roaming and after there was a problem I followed the instructions that Verizon Customer Service personnel gave me to the letter.
Just to clarify, if this had happened the first month I had been on ships (over two years ago) when using Verizon or this phone then I would be more inclined to believe that I had made some mistake and just pay and turn the darned thing off carefully every time I walked up the gangway of the ship, but since I have had Data Roaming disabled the ENTIRE time I have owned the phone and have never been charged before then I feel I was justified in thinking that disabling Data Roaming on the phone would successfully.....well....disable the phones ability to receive DATA while ROAMING.

Thanks for that information. I read a lot of posts here before I posted mine and based on what I have seen from others I tried to be as detailed as possible. If I send anything to a VZW account I will leave my cell number and contact information as you suggest. I'm still hopeful that the last customer service rep I talked to was honest and accurate when she told me the situation had been resolved in my favor.
I saw many posts from folks that seemed to be asking for adjustments to bills for mistakes that they themselves had made but I honestly don't think I'm in that postion.
On the other hand I am in the position of having to deal with Customer Service reps who have probably heard pretty much everything in the book from folks to try to get charges reduced, so upper level supervisors who can actually approve my bill adjustment are probably not even reading the entire text from my multiple phone calls and explanations, thus simply declining the two supervisors who understood my situation and made the request for the billing adjustment.
The way it works (from what I can tell) is that the customer contact level person has a supervisor that they have to report to who then has to send any bill adjustment request (or perhaps any request over a certain amount) to another supervisor (one who is NOT ever in direct contact with customers) who makes the final call on whether or not a bill adjustment request goes through.
My main frustration comes from the fact that you can never request to speak with the last representative that you spoke with on the phone (according to all the reps I spoke with) and they can't even call each other...all of their communication is done via email. This tends to ...from what I have experienced....create situations where a rep will tell a customer whatever they want to hear, knowing that there is almost NO CHANCE that they will ever have to speak to that customer again. It also creates a situation where if the last rep didn't leave detailed or accurate notes then you have to go over every detail of your situation with the next rep you speak with.
My converstation with the Customer Service person who told me the issue was resolved took place yesterday morning so if things are actually taken care of then tomorrow should be the day the adjustment comes in at the latest.
Thanks again for your suggestion. I wouldn't have known how to contact anyone directly from Verizon here without your post.

I can't find the 2G, 3G and LTE options after updating to iOS8.1, can anyone help me with this? I'm using iPhone5s

I can't find the 2G, 3G and LTE options after updating to iOS8.1, can anyone help me with this? I'm using iPhone5s

I have check on my service provider about the correct APN settings, but unfortunately doesnt work still..

HT1688 I updated my iPhone 5C to the iOS 7.0.1 "bug fixes" update and it has made my phone glitch constantly and has just made it a complete nightmare. How can I go back down to iOS 7?

basically yeah, I updated my software because it said that iOS 7.0.1 was out as a bug fixes update and now my phone constantly glitches the **** out, its super slow, and it pretty much created more bugs than it did fix them. So how can I go back to iOS 7? because 7.0.1 is an absolute nightmare.

Try updating to iOS 7.0.2.
Does your iPhone still have performance issues? Have you tried the basics?

To disable the horizontal scrollbar and to create a next button to navigate

To disable the horizontal scrollbar and to create a next button to navigate through the records. At present I create a JSF page and drag and drop my table view and then using the Tuning property I have limited the number of records to be shown. But I need to add a button and then code it to display the next few records. Can someone kindly suggest a suitable mechanism to get this accomplished.
Edited by: 888970 on Oct 2, 2011 10:15 PM

Hi Erp,
At present these are the entries that I have in my JSPX page.
I have a Table, Iterator and a Input List of Values. As per the scenario, I want a few rows to appear on the table for which I wanted to disable the horizontal scroll bar and then once I click on the list of values it must prompt me with the remaining page numbers.
Earlier there are about 150 records in the table. I want to show them as 15 per page.
For which I have added the Iterator and a LOV component code in my JSPX page.
<af:iterator id="i1"
value="#{bindings.NsEventDetailsView1.collectionModel}"
var="row"
binding="#{pageFlowScope.testPageBean.myIterator}"/>
<af:inputListOfValues label="Label 1"
popupTitle="Search and Result Dialog" id="ilov1"/>
Then I created the bean class as per the example.
Below is the bean class:
import javax.faces.event.ValueChangeEvent;
import oracle.adf.view.rich.context.AdfFacesContext;
import org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.component.UIXIterator;
import org.apache.myfaces.trinidad.event.AttributeChangeEvent;
public class TestPagebean {
public TestPagebean() {
public void i1ov1_valueChangeListener(ValueChangeEvent valueChangeEvent) {
// Add event code here...
private UIXIterator myiter;
public void setI1(UIXIterator myiter) {
this.myiter=myiter;
public UIXIterator getmyiter() {
this.myiter=myiter;
public UIXIterator setmyiter() {
return myiter;
UIXIterator valueIterator = getmyiter();
if (!valueChangeEvent.getNewValue().equals(valueChangeEvent.getOldValue())) {
int newPage =
Integer.parseInt(valueChangeEvent.getNewValue().toString());
int pageStart = (newPage) * valueIterator.getRows();
valueIterator.setFirst(pageStart);
AdfFacesContext.getCurrentInstance().addPartialTarget(valueIterator);
But i am getting errors in the bean class.
1. Block expecting }
2. public UIXIterator getmyiter() {
this.myiter=myiter;
Return Statement missing
3. Block expecting {
4. Type or variable 'valueChangeEvent' not found
5. Method 'getNewValue' not found
6. Method 'getOldValue' not found
7. Method 'toString' not found
Can you suggest a possible solution?

How can i disable a submit button and execute submit_action method on click

Good Day,
On my page I have a submit button that execute the submit_action method of the page backing bean that submit data captured on the page into a database and activate another class that send mail at the same time on a click of the submit button,the mail process takes a while before returning back to the page.I was able to disable the submit button to prevent the user from keep click while the process is running but the issue is on clicking the submit button it only disable the submit button without executing the submit_action method of the page backing bean.How can i disable the submit button and execute submit_method of the backing bean at the same time.
Thanks in advance.

I tried this out on one of my pages to see if it works.
First, I added the following JavaScript to my submit button's onClick event:
this.disabled=true; return true;When I clicked the submit button, it was disabled but the form was not submitted.
I deleted the JavaScript from the onClick event and added the following JavaScript to the form's onSubmit event:
var button = document.getElementById("form1:submitButton"); button.disabled=true; return true;When I click the submit button, it was disabled and the form was submitted but the button's action method was not called.
The next thing I tried was to change the onSubmit event code:
var button = document.getElementById("form1:submitButton"); setTimeout("button.disabled=true", 500); return true;This seemed to work. The difference was that I added a 1/2 second delay before disabling the button.
See if that works for you. If not then I'm fresh out of ideas.

How can I Hide(not Disable) the Save As and Exit options in the File menu of Excel Documents in SharePoint 2013?

Hi,
I want to hide(not disable) the "Save As" and "Exit" options in the File Menu of Excel Documents in SharePoint 2013.When I make changes in the excelribbon.css file of xlviewer.aspx,all the options under File menu are getting hidden but
I want to hide only these two options while retaining the others.
Kindly suggest me a method to achieve this.
Looking forward to your reply at the earliest.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sanjana

Hi Sanjana,
To hide the “Save As” and “Exit” options in xlviewer.aspx page in SharePoint, I recommend to use the code below(however it is not recommended):
<style>
div.cui-menusection li.cui-menusection-items:nth-child(2)
display:none !important;
div#m_excelWebRenderer_ewaCtl_menuJewelSaveAs{
display:none !important;
div#m_excelWebRenderer_ewaCtl_msJewelSecondary{
display:none !important;
</style>
As “:nth-child()” selector is supported in IE 9 and later versions, please use IE 9 or later versions’ IE browser.
http://www.w3schools.com/cssref/sel_nth-child.asp
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

How can I Hide/ Disable the Question mark and Exit button in the Top right corner of Link Bar of Excel Documents in SharePoint 2013?

Hi,
How can we Hide / Disable the Help(?) and Close(x) buttons which are located in the right corner of the Top Link Bar in the Sharepoint Document Library pages as well as Excel Web Access?
Our requirement is : When we try to view the Excel Services Report from another web site, Help(?) and Close(x) icons are also appearing in the Excel Web Access Web Part, but we don't want to display them in our site.
Please let us know the solution for this case.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Sanjana

Hi,
In the xlviewer.aspx, we can find the two buttons like this:
To hide them, you need to add the CSS into the xlviewer.aspx which stays in:
C:\Program Files\Common Files\microsoft shared\Web Server Extensions\15\TEMPLATE\LAYOUTS
Best regards,
Patrick
Patrick Liang
TechNet Community Support

The "Without Qty Posting" check box appears disabled in A/P and A/R credit Memo Rows

Dear All,
The "Without Qty Posting" check box appears disabled in A/P and A/R credit Memo Rows even when set visible and active in the form settings. Please advice. SAP Business One version 8.82 PL 13
regards
Deb

Hi,
Please check:
The field is available only in the following
cases:
1. A/R credit memos not based on other documents or
2. A/R credit memos based on an A/R invoice or
3. A/R credit memos based on an A/R reserve invoice, for which items have been delivered, and
4. if non-drop-ship warehouses are used
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Sql server service wont start after disabling TLS 1.0 and SSL 3.0 on windows

We have been hardening our servers for some time now and recently we disabled SSL 3.0 because of the poodle attack. When I did this on one of our test servers SQL Server failed to start up after the restart.
I have been able to reproduce this on Windows Server 2012 and Windows 7 by disabling TLS 1.0 and SSL 3.0 through the registry. I am using SQL Server 2012 on the server machine. On my windows 7 machine sql server 2012 and sql server 2005 will not start with
those disabled.
These are the event log errors I get:
Application Logs:
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) SQL Server could not spawn FRunCM thread. Check the SQL Server error log and the Windows event logs for information about possible related problems.
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) Could not start the network library because of an internal error in the network library. To determine the cause, review the errors immediately preceding this one in the error log.
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) TDSSNIClient initialization failed with error 0x80090331, status code 0x1.
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) TDSSNIClient initialization failed with error 0x80090331, status code 0x80.
System Logs:
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) The SQL Server (MSSQLSERVER) service terminated with service-specific error %%-2146893007.
(28/10/2014 8:38:54 AM) A fatal error occurred while creating an SSL server credential. The internal error state is 10013.
Done anyone know have we can keep SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0 disabled and get SQLServer server to start?

Hi Don,
I already have TLS 1.0 Disabled to prevent the BEAST exploit. So the values I have for:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS
1.0\Server
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS
1.0\Client
Both have enabled set to ("Enabled"=dword:00000000).
If change both of these back to ("Enabled"=dword:00000001)
to enable TLS 1.0, and restart then SQLServer is able to start again. But we are now vulnerable to the BEAST attack once again.
If I keep server enabled and disable the client or vice versa and restart. Then SQLServer starts but I
am unable to connect to it. When I check the Event logs I get the same errors as my original past.
With your last post, do you mean to backup SCHANNEL and delete it so it gets recreated? If that is the case it will probably work because if I re enable SSL 3.0 or TLS 1.0 from here it fix's the issue, but I then I won't have the exploits patched and
we need this for some of our customers.
This is my SCHANNEL Export:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\SSL 2.0]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\SSL 2.0\Client]
"DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000001
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\SSL 3.0]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\SSL 3.0\Client]
"DisabledByDefault"=dword:00000001
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\SSL 3.0\Server]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.0]
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.0\Client]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\SecurityProviders\SCHANNEL\Protocols\TLS 1.0\Server]
"Enabled"=dword:00000000

I have been using aurora and updated to 12.0a2 and my computer continually freezes even after disabling all plug-ins and i have even dumped stuff from the memory on my hard drive.

i continually get the same 12.0a2 update box that pops up in the bottom right corner even though i have the updated version and i have to wait for the aurora updater to do something everytime i start a new session. i went through and disabled all plug-ins and have no extensions active and this doesn't solve the problem. according to plug-in check all plug-ins are up to date. aurora does crash every once in a while where it closes out all my windows...but i do not get the crash report anymore to report it. is there a problem with aurora? i even updated FF in case that had a factor in the crashes/freezes!! FF used to do this same thing all the timea fter a new update but this is ridiculous!! WHAT IS THE PROBLEM? typos courtesy of freezing!!!is there a problem with aurora? i can't go more than 2 minutes without constant freezing and the "not responding" message. i have run scans on my computer weekly since i updated to aurora and there is no threats/problems...why does this keep happening?
addendum...i have added the crash reports for the last week...does that give any insight into why this keeps happening?

i am not sure what this means? "not for public use"? i did not seek out another version of FF it was an option on mozilla's page when i needed to update FF!! i know that i will run into these problems if i do not keep current and it was an option so i chose it. are you suggesting that i dump aurora from my system and go back to using just FF? i'm not a developer or know anything deep regarding the physical or logical of systems...i am just trying to keep good maintenance on my system!! i need a browser that works with me and not against me...chrome does not do what i need...neither does opera...FF is the only browser that i have used for almost 4 years now and i don't plan on going back to IE or changing to those mentioned above...i just want to know that when i see new offerings on mozilla products and i accept them into my system that they work much better than what i am experiencing currently!! i get that it is open-sourced and therefore a work in progress

Use Group Policy to disable user interface items and shortcut keys in IE

Hi,
We are creating a kiosk mode of IE with full restriction to the machines drives and other applications. For that we need to disable all the shortcuts keys like ctrl, shift, alt and combination of these keys. Can anyone help me on this. i want to done this
through GPO. Client machines are windows 7 and we are having windows server 2008 R2 (AD server).
Thanks,
UdayaKumar S

I need to disable the ctrl, Alt, and shift keys and combinations of these keys with other keys as for example, cltrl+H, Ctrl+o, ets., and most important thing is, we need to apply it only through GPO not by using any other tools/ applications.
I'm not aware of any GPO-only methods to achieve your goal (hence my other suggestions), sorry.
Others might comment here with their thoughts/suggestions/experiences..
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

Roaming disabled bug on 4G and LTE

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for