Rollup issue

I want certain member of my fact data not to rollup in the higher level,instead when rolled up to higher level it should show a particular value.
So i wrote this code,
FIX(@LEVMBRS("Market",0), @LEVMBRS("Years", 0), @LEVMBRS("Year", 0),@LEVMBRS("Entry Version",0) );
VAR V1;
"Total Budget Accum (Sites)"(
IF(@ISMBR("Q1"))
V1="Total Budget Accum (Sites)"->"Mar";
"Total Budget Accum (Sites)"->"Q1"=V1;
ENDIF;)
ENDFIX
CALC ALL EXCEPT MBR ("Total Budget Accum (Sites)");
But the problem is it is getting rolled up in higher level.
Please help me to find a way around.
Regards,
Suman

Unless Q1 is at level 0 of Years, your code will never evaluate.
Is it at level 0 or a higher level.
Instead of trying to do this in a calc script, you might have more luck putting the logic into a member formula.
And in fact a TB Last might do exactly what you're trying to do without any formula whatsoever.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour

Similar Messages

  • BPC Alternate hierarchy rollup issue - require help

    Hi All,
    We are seeing a rollup issue on Alternate Hierarchies. We had set-up alternate hierarchies on our Country Dimension (DC) to assist some managerial reporting that is only relevant to one of our Operating segments.
    To show the problem, I am listing an example of our Country dimension member sheet. I have put "**" delimiter between the pertinent values to show which columns the values land under.
    ID*DescriptionPARENTH1PARENTH2FORMULAH1*FORMULAH2
    MAIN_HIER*Main Hier* ** ** ** **
    D1*DC EuropeMAIN_HIER* ** ** **
    A*Country AD1SG1* ** **
    B*Country BD1SG1* ** **
    C*Country CD1SG2* ** **
    D*Country DD1SG3* ** **
    D2--DC India*MAIN_HIER* ** ** **
    E*Country ED2--ALT_HIER* ** **
    C1*Calc Eur* ** *DC.H1.D1+DC.H1.E* **
    ALT_HIER*Alt Hier* ** ** ** **       
    SG1*Sub Reg 1* *ALT_HIER* ** ** 
    SG2*Sub Reg 2* *ALT_HIER* ** **
    SG3*Sub Reg 3* *ALT_HIER* ** **
    We have our main Country hierarchy that comes under the root parent MAIN_HIER. In addition to that on our main hierarchy we had a calculated node for Calc Europe (C1) which is supposed to be a summation of DC Europe (D1) + Country E (E). We had created an alternate hierarchy to represent a breakdown by more subregions (SG1, SG2, SG3 and Country E) within DC Europe so basically the root node of the alternate Hierarchy (ALT_HIER) should show the same amounts as the calculated node C1 on the main hierarchy.
    If we take a higher level Account dimension member like NET_SALES the values tie out but if we take a base member in the Account Hierarchy (e.g one representing Customer Sales), the values don't match with the ALT_HIER values seem being the wrong ones. It almost seems like the rollups of the Alternate Hierarchy are not accurate.
    Could you pls. shed some light on if the dimension member set-up above is wrong from any angle.
    BTW, we are on BPC 7.0M SP04 Patch 2 and SQLServer version is SQLServer 2005 EE SP3.
    Your insights would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Abhay Shanbhag

    Abhay:
    Please try below...
    Add "RollupChildren(Account.Hx.CurrentMember,"+") to all non-base members who don't aggregate properly under FORMULAHx. For instance, I have below hierarchy PARENTH1 for Balance Sheet Total Asset
    BALSHEET
    TotalAsset
    -CurrentAsset
    -NonCurrentAsset
    If CurrentAsset and NonCurrentAsset all roll up fine but TotalAsset doesn't add up. In your Dimension, put MDX formula RollupChildren(Account.H1.CurrentMember,"+") for TotalAsset and BALSHEET under FORMULAH1.
    We have this issue when we created additional hierarchies, and it took us a while to debug before I got this hint from SAP Support. Ever since it works like a charm =)
    Hope this helps
    Brian

  • Rollup issue with sigma symbol...

    Hi Gurus,,
    Could any one please tell how to do a Rollup when it is failed with showing the Sigma symbol into the Target??? when i m trying to repeat it ,it is Failing with Roll-up still active?????
    Regards
    Pavan

    Hi,
    Rollup may fail due to Locking issues/when any parallel jobs are running like(Delete/Build indexes/Compress requests), so make sure none of the above jobs shouldn't run when rollup is running.
    1)check for Locks in SM12
    Rollup when it is failed with showing the Sigma symbol into the Target
    Sigma symbol indicated that rollup is running, that is why it is getting failed when ur teying to repeat . so wait till it get compelted. check huv many records are there, if data is more then wait for some time, it'll completed automatically and u can see a Tick mark in manage. however you need to Repeat it in you PC.

  • Parent Child Hierachy Revenue Rollup Issue

    Hi All,
    I have modeled my parent child hiearchy in such a way that revenue for each parent is equal to sum of his revenue and all his descendents. So If this my table
    Empname|Revenue
    David|100
    James|25
    Terry|30
    this is what my hierachy shows
    --David(155)
    ---James(25)
    ---Terry(30)
    Now this is working perfectly fine and this is how users want it to be. To roll up the revenue for all the descendents uptil the top level.
    The issue is, users also want to see what revenue David contributed. Because, as per the above example, when they try to add 25(James) + 30(Terry), it comes to 55 and the revenue contributed by David (100) becomes implicit and David straightaway shows 155. So they want to have a small pop up or any other column in the report which bifurcates David's revenue with others just to add more sense to David's revenue of 155.
    Is there any workaround which could be done in the same report or do I have to create a separate detail report ?
    Thanks,
    Ronny

    Thanks Dpka, I did exactly that, there is a small issue. Let's say my hierarchy is (I have just dded one more level under David). So James and Terry reports to Thomas and Thomans reports to David.
    --David(165)
    ----Thomas(65)
    ------James(25)
    ------Terry(30)
    David is the top level and Thomans the next level. Now when I click on David, it takes me to the target report and shows me the revenue as expected but when I click on either Thomas, James or Terry, it doesn't take me to the target report. At the bottom left it shows me an error. This is what the error is
    Message: 'getLevelInfo(...)' is null or not an object
    Line: 1
    Char: 11142
    Code: 0
    URI: http://wmdwm100a.midlandls.int:7001/analytics/res/b_mozilla/answers/selectionsmodel.js
    So It is working only for the top level managers whose doesn't have any anscestor. Any ideas why is tha so?
    Thanks,
    Ronny

  • Infoset problem: rollup issue

    Hi,
    I have a problem in Infoset.
    Actually i built an infoset based on two infocubes.
    One cube has - Customer, revenue, cost
    Other cube - Customer, name, address
    1st Cube
    Customer     Period/fiscal year      Fiscal year         Revenue    Cost
    A                  01/2008                  2008                   10             5
    A                  02/2008                  2008                   20             2
    B                  02/2008                  2008                   30             5
    2nd cube
    Customer     Name          Address
    A                John            12 street
    B                michael       45 street
    Now im getting value while doing infoset
    A          John           12street         01/2008       2008      10            5    
    B          michael       45 street       02/2008       2008       30           5
    It doesnot consider the line 2 of 1st cube. I want it to rollup and show revenue and cost as 1020 and 52
    How should i do that?
    Regards

    Are you using inner join or left outer join?
    Checkout the below thread if this is of use.
    InfoSet Joins - Left Outer Join problems

  • Rollup Issue On Average Costing Method

    Hi,
    I want to understand correctly the meaning of the rollup on 'Average' costing method.
    As I understand it, the rollup is meaningful on 'standard' costing method, when I change the costs for some/all items, and I wanted to update the cost of the items parents appropriately.
    But in the 'average' costing, if I change the cost for some child item, the cost of the parent will changed by the average by the time.
    When I use the rollup on 'Average' costing method ?
    Thanks.

    hi,
    u cannot perform rollup on average costing method.

  • Essbase Q1 Year Tot rollup issue

    Hello Everyone,  I'm a Essbase newbie, just came back from the Oracle Essbase Bootcamp and already stuck on something (very simple) I presume.... I hope someone can point me in the right direction.
    The only way i can explain this issue is that my Lev0 members are rolled up correctly but any higher members are not.  ie,  Units and List price is aggregated correctly on a quarterly level but my Gross Sales figures are being calculated in a strange way rather than just rolling up the figures of the months.
    Here is a output from smartview to explain it:
    January
    February
           March
                       Q1
                   Units
    158
    238
    128
    524
                   List Price
    200
    200
    200
    600
              Gross Sales
    31600
    47600
    25600
    314400
              Gross Sales
    31600
    47600
    25600
    314400
                   Discount %
    0.04
    0.06
    0.04
    0.14
              Discounts
    1264
    2856
    1024
    44016
         Net Sales
    30336
    44744
    24576
    270384
                   Units
    158
    238
    128
    524
                   Labor/Unit
    30
    30
    30
    90
              Direct Labor
    4740
    7140
    3840
    47160
                   Units
    158
    238
    128
    524
                   Matl/Unit
    72
    72
    72
    216
              Material
    11376
    17136
    9216
    113184
                   Direct Labor
    4740
    7140
    3840
    47160
                   Overhead Rate
    1.2
    1.2
    1.2
    3.6
              Overhead
    5688
    8568
    4608
    169776
         Cost of Sales
    21804
    32844
    17664
    330120
    If you look at my Q1 data for Gross Sales data rather then being aggregated from the monthly figures, it is worked out by multiplying the Units and List price on the Q1 level. (ie. 524*600 and not by adding up the Jan, Feb March gross Sales figures(31600, 47600, 25600).  Is there something I have missed, I;m using the Oracle Study guides and following the instructions to the letter, and in the Study guide the Q1 figures are shown to be added up correctly.
    Thanks
    Moss

    Hi Sam, no Two pass is turned off... please have a look at the following to show how gross sales is being worked out:
    http://i.imgur.com/cS1nc70.jpg
    There are no fixes or formulas being used yet...

  • Rollup Error - Characteristic attribute exists twice

    BELOW IS THE ERROR DURING ROLLUP step in a process chain .
    enqueue set: 100014
    compond index checked on table: /BIC/E100014
    request statistics calculated for p-dimid 14454
    enqueue released: 100014
    Characteristic attribute exists twice--status red
    please help
    Edited by: kartikeyan on Dec 16, 2008 4:08 PM

    Hi,
       We are facing similar rollup issue - "Characteristic attribute exists twice".  Pls share the solution if you have got one.
    Thanks,
    Suresh

  • Problem with replicated partitioning between two BSO db's. version 9.3.0.1

    Hi there,
    I have a problem with partitioning between two BSO db’s.
    I created the partition, it validates and I made an export for the partion definiton(xml file).
    Everything is fine if I set this partition up as transparent partition.
    This means I can see the data from the src in the trg db as ecpected.
    But when I change over to replicated (what in fact I want to do) nothing happens for the trg site - there are still no data. (Yes I have choosen Update all cells.)
    I got no error in any way neither AAS nor in the app logs of src and trg.
    (Mayby this it important: one src-dimension is mapped to void for the trg.)
    Can anyone give me a hint or even confirm this behaviour ?
    Thank you in advance
    Andre
    Below the log infos:
    log of src db:
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA///Info(1013210)
    User [hyperion] set active on database [db]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA/db/hyperion/Info(1013091)
    Received Command [PutReplicatedCells] from user [hyperion]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA///Info(1013210)
    User [hyperion] set active on database [db]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA/db/hyperion/Info(1013091)
    Received Command [XferReplicatedCells] from user [hyperion]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA///Info(1013214)
    Clear Active on User [hyperion] Instance [1]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA/db/hyperion/Info(1023005)
    Update of replicated partition elapsed time : [0] seconds
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA/db/hyperion/Info(1243010)
    Partition refreshed
    log of trg db:
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1///Info(1013210)
    User [hyperion] set active on database [db]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1/db/hyperion/Info(1013091)
    Received Command [ReqXferReplicatedCells] from user [hyperion]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1///Info(1013210)
    User [hyperion] set active on database [db]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1/db/hyperion/Info(1013091)
    Received Command [ProtocolXchg] from user [hyperion]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1/db/hyperion/Info(1023044)
    Processing distributed request from [P4B5A856A, AAA, db]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1/db/hyperion/Info(1013091)
    Received Command [PutLastUpdatedTime] from user [hyperion]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1///Info(1013214)
    Clear Active on User [hyperion] Instance [1]
    [Fri Dec 04 15:29:03 2009]Local/AAA1///Info(1013214)
    Clear Active on User [hyperion] Instance [1]

    It sounds like you are doing it all correctly. One thing you might try just to be sure you are not getting any data in the target database is the following:
    1) clear the target database
    2) Run the replication for all cells
    3) Run an export of all data on the target database
    See if you get anything in the export file, maybe you are getting some of the data or possibly it is a rollup issue. Just a thought.
    Jeff

  • Compression Error - Characteristic attribute exists twice

    Hi,
    We are compressing some top listed productive  cubes with process chain every week. But from past 3 iterations one of the cube is failing to do so. It is triggering an error
    " *Characteristic attribute exists twice *". We even tried to compress the cube manually..but the same result.
    Can any one suggest how to proceed to make the compression upto the mark.
    Thanks,
    Vidyasagar

    Hi,
       We are facing similar rollup issue - "Characteristic attribute exists twice".  Pls share the solution if you have got one.
    Thanks,
    Suresh

  • Issues after installing Hotfix Rollup 5 for SP3

    Hi,
    Last weekend we installed Hotfix Rollup Pack 5 for SP3 on our (single) Exchange 2010 Enterprise server.
    This was needed to fix the WebApp Light issue with IE11 and to fix the problem where users were unsable to delete mails sent from multifunctionals.
    These 2 issues were fixed by installing the hotfix rollup pack, but now our users have different problems...
    Some users (not all of them, haven't found a common denominator yet) report that they don't see new mails in their Outlook 2010 box, even though they got the envelope notifier.
    When they change folder and back to the Inbox the new mail is suddenly visible.
    Same sort of "delay" happens when users mark a message for follow-up or try to change a message from unread to read.
    Some users also report that they see delegated mailboxes (mailboxes from other users that they have full mailbox access to) twice in their Outlook 2010.
    Outlook 2010 is running in online mode (because it's running on terminal/citrix servers), so it's no issue with caching as far as I understand.
    I've already checked if there are any updates for Outlook available, but we've installed them all already.
    I though I'd found something:
    Noticed a lot of errors in the application log on the Exchange Server which pointed me to this:
    http://theintegrity.co.uk/2010/08/mapi-session-exceeded-the-maximum-of-500-objects-of-type-objtfolder/
    I've added the registry values now with a value of 1500, but unfortunately this didn't help.
    The errors in the eventlog are gone, but even after restarting the IS some users still have these problems.
    One user reported that it takes about 7 minutes for a read mail to actually switch to "read" when looking at his inbox.
    Did anyone else notice these problems? And maybe have a fix for them?
    I really don't want to roll back the update :(
    I even rebooted the Exchange Server after installing the rollup even though that wasn't even necessary
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards,
    Jeroen

    Correct - http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2925273 discusses this issue.
    If you do raise a support case to request this, please ensure that you review and understand the requirements for IU installation and removal.
    For example:   You *MUST* manually remove it prior to installing Exchange 2010 SP3 RU6.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Issue with Update Rollup 5 for Exchange 2010 SP3 - Mailboxes that were auto mapped not working

    Below is  my response in another thread but creating a new one in the hopes that someone has the same issue and a solution besides mine below.
    Ever since we installed Update Rollup 5 for SP3 Exchange 2010 mailboxes that were auto mapped are not accessible. They all get the same error.
    Cannot expand the folder. The set of folders cannot be opened. The attempt to log on to the Microsoft Exchange has failed.
    What I have been doing is removing the users permission, then adding them back using the noautomap switch in Powershell. After doing that, the user manually adds the mailbox and all is well.
    Just a note here, I suspect it may have something to do with the version of Outlook 2010. We are running an older version here. I think only SP1 with no other incremental updates. Office is up to SP2. Also, one of the users I was working with could not access
    the mailbox no matter what we tried but she can walk over to another workstation and open Outlook and access the very same mailbox so that pretty much proves its software related particularly with Outlook.
    I cannot reproduce the problem on a workstation (XP) with a newer version of Outlook.
    This has been wearing me out and I suspected the Update Rollup all long. Now I am confident as others are having the same problem. If you find out anything on how to fix this other than the steps above, let me know.

    Not sure why it was suggested to use the auto mapping feature to grant permissions because that is the component that is causing the issue. Also, there is nothing wrong with the auto configuration because the user can access their own mailbox just fine and
    also select mailboxes in their Outlook that were NOT auto mapped.
    With that said, here is how I fixed them all.
    Remove the permissions using the Exchange Console. Don't forget Send As
    Wait about 15 minutes. The mailbox should disappear from the users Outlook
    Open an Exchange PowerShell window and run the following command:
    .\add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1 -Identity mailbox -User user -AccessRights FullAccess
    Have the user add the mailbox to their Outlook using the manual process.
    All is well....
    If you don't have the PS script add-mailboxpermissionsnoautomap.ps1, you can download it. I stumbled across it a few years ago and use it all the time. If you can't find it, just use the Exchange built in command for adding mailbox folder permissions but
    specify automap $false.
    The idea here is to grant the user access without auto mapping.

  • Exchange Server 2010 SP3 - Rollup 8 - Issue - Problems with client connections - MS Outlook 2013

    Exchange Server 2010 SP3 - Rollup 8 - Issue - Problems with client connections - MS Outlook 2013
    Detected Problems:
    - Access denied for attached mailbox (department mailbox)
    - Access denied for delete or move messages on own mailbox
    - Can't send new messages with error (Error: [0x80004005-00000000-00000000])
    Solution:
    - Rollback to Exchange 2010 SP3 - Rollup 7
    - You can rollback to Exchange 2010 SP3 - RollUp 7 in 30 min
    Algunos de los destinatarios no recibieron su mensaje.
    Asunto:     Hola
    Enviado el: 11/12/2014 8:35
    No se puede localizar a los destinatarios siguientes:
    '[email protected]' en 11/12/2014 8:35
    Este mensaje no se pudo enviar. Inténtelo de nuevo más tarde, o póngase en contacto con el administrador de red. 
    Error: [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].

    See the following forum thread: 
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/1be9b816-b0ab-40ea-a43a-446239f8eae3/outlook-client-issues-following-exchange-2010-rollup-8

  • Outlook Client Issues following Exchange 2010 Rollup 8

    Update Rollup 8 For Exchange 2010 SP3 (KB2986475) was applied to our Exchange server last night.
    All appears to be fine, but users are having all kind of trouble using the Outlook Client to connect to their mailboxes.
    Randomly they can't view certain folders (Inbox/Sent Items). Can no longer save to their Calendars. Errors relating to permissions and Outlook notifications?!?!?!?!
    This is ONLY when using the Outlook Client - webmail works fine.
    There are also no issues when running Outlook in safe mode.
    Any advice would be very much appreciated.
    Thanks
    David

    The following has been posted onto the Exchange team site:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2014/12/09/exchange-releases-december-2014.aspx
    Update 12/10/2014:
    An issue has been identified in the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8. The update has been recalled and is no longer available on the download center pending a new RU8 release. Customers should not proceed with deployments of this update until the
    new RU8 version is made available. Customers who have already started deployment of RU8 should rollback this update. 
    The issue impacts the ability of Outlook to connect to Exchange, thus we are taking the action to recall the RU8 to resolve this problem. We will deliver a revised RU8 package as soon as the issue can be isolated, corrected, and validated. We will publish
    further updates to this blog post regarding RU8. 
    This issue only impacts the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 RU8 update, the other updates remain valid and customers can continue with deployment of these packages.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Exchange 2010 SP3 Rollup 6 issue with Forefront

    This rollup, 2936871, when installed on a server having Forefront Protection for Exchange Server integrated with Exchange services, causing Information Store not starting. For this we have to disable the integration and start the services. When again you
    try to integrate and start the services, Exchange services will not start. So you should not integrate Forefront with Exchange services at all, finally.
    Has anybody already in this soup?
    Whether Microsoft has checked this? Any solution?
    The error events are the below two:
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeIS
    Event ID:      9581
    Task Category: Virus Scanning
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    Description:
    Error code 1 returned from virus scanner initialization routine. Virus scanner was not loaded. 
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeIS
    Event ID:      9564
    Task Category: General
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    Description:
    Error 0x1 starting the Microsoft Exchange Information Store.
    Failed to start virus scan.

    Hi,
    Hotfix Rollup 3 for Microsoft Forefront Protection for Exchange can address the issue that the Exchange Information store crashes with Forefront Protection for Exchange installed. I recommend you install Hotfix Rollup 3 for Microsoft Forefront Protection
    for Exchange to check the result.
    Here is a related article for your reference.
    Description of Hotfix Rollup 3 for Microsoft Forefront Protection for Exchange
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2538719/en#Fix4
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for