Router to PC VPN with device authen only via RSA Sig

Problem establishing a vpn between a cisco router and a PC based Cisco VPN Client
using version 4.6 (had problems with 4.8 & 5.0). Only trying to accomplish
device authenication with digital certificates without any interest in user
authenication/authorization, so I've eliminated the Xauth from IKE and login
stuff from the client config.
I've got to take about half a dozen users into production asap...
I am thinking the access list may be the problem since the pc client is
expecting to have encrypted communications, but the cisco router is
still doing all it's checks and balances with IKE/ISAKMP to finish device
authenication with one certificate on each. Error message seem straight
forward, but I'm new to the vpn config's and have tested pki for
about 6 months wo/ going into production. Attached are logs with recommended
debug turned on for crypto ike/ipsec/pki/etc.

Thank you for your response!
After further investigation, I'm more concerned about Cisco's IOS 12.4 "Certificate Server" being able to consistently build certificates. Do I need to depend upon a certain Test release like 12.4T because 12.4 isn't ready ....? It's in the 12.4 documentation as though it's ready and I couldn't find any comments in the caveats...
I have tried to build a "request for a certificate" with both with the Cisco VPN Client 4.8/5.0, and Mozilla's add-on to firefox called Key Manager, but both failed.
Just loading base64 instream directly into the IOS crypto cmd to enroll via the terminal fails regularly, besides trying to use SCEP (Cisco's simple certificate enrollment protocol).
I don't care how it gets done, because I like Cisco's architecture so much, but it's got to be reliable.
I don't mind getting involved with Cisco's testing and I believe I can replicate the errors.
Attached is an error of the IOS 12.4 failing...

Similar Messages

IPhone contacts: file transfer to Windows 7 via USB-cable My iPhone can communicate with the computer only via USB-cable (no mobile data, no bluetooth, no internet, no outlook). As I want to get the phone to the "doctor" I want to save specifically

iPhone contacts: file transfer to Windows 7 via USB-cable
My iPhone can communicate with the computer only via USB-cable (no mobile data, no bluetooth, no internet, no outlook). As I want to get the phone to the "doctor" I want to save specifically my contact data and calendar details on the computer (OS: Windows 7). How can I solve this task? I will appreciate your valuable information, thanks.

Using the iPhone, the USB cable, iTunes and Windows Contacts, sync the iPhone contacts to Windows Contacts. That will save them there. They are also included in the iPhone backup made in iTunes, and if you use iCloud.
I'm sorry, I missed the calendar part the first time I looked. For calendar, you need a supported application on the computer (Outlook) or if you use iCloud, you can use the iCloud contacts and calendar app to sync.

Can I use ISE IPN without posture for VPN with Base license only?

I'm looking at ISE licensing, and both Base and Advanced licenses have VPN listed. I could not find any document that provides guideline for VPN implementation using ISE Base license only.
1. Can I use ISE IPN (Inline Posture Node) functionality without posture assessment with ISE Base license only? (I know it has to be ISE hardware appliance, and I know that Posture assessment requires ISE Advanced license.)
2. Do I have to use IPN for VPN deployment using ISE as the Radius server?
3. If I do not have to use IPN for VPN, can I use ISE for Authentication and Authorization in the same way as I use ACS?
Thanks,
Val Rodionov

Val,
There is no need to consider IPN if you are not using posturing. You can use ISE much like ACS for radius authentication for vpn users.
If posturing is down the road and your hope is to have an architecture in place and license later, then I am sure that you can use the ipn with base licensing, however I would strongle recommend working with the PDI (for partners) for help and confirmation.
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

VPN with Firwall

I an using ASA5510 as firwall and vpn is configured.Inside my office i have two networks one with 10.X.X.X and 192.X.X.X .My insdie firwall interface configured with 10.X.X.X network.When I connect from outside using VPN client I can access 10.X.X.X network but other network I can't access.How can I make it.
Thanks in Advance
Suresh

Do you have split tunnel configured? if you do, you would need to add the 192.x.x.x network.
Also, do you have NAT exemption configured? if you do, you would need to include the 192.x.x.x network.
I assume that you already have static route to reach the 192.x.x.x network from the ASA? and the 192.x.x.x network knows how to route to the vpn client pool subnet, ie: via the ASA?

New imac 27(Intel based,bought 2013) slow wifi connection with my Verizon fios actiontec router. All other wireless devices in the house(ipad 3gen,MacBook Air ,hp laptop) have a much faster connection. Should I change router settings to G only,etc

New imac 27(Intel based,bought 2013) slow wifi connection with my Verizon fios actiontec router. All other wireless devices in the house(ipad 3gen,MacBook Air ,hp laptop) have a much faster connection. Should I change router settings to G only,switch channel from auto to maybe 6,channel width to 20mhz? Already changed security settings to WPA2. Currently router is running in mixed b and g mode.

If you have one computer running on G they will all run on G. All ROUTERS are backward compatible, in otherwords if you have a group of computers and all of them are N compatible and one or two are G They will all work but the N computers will run at N and those that are G will run at G speed not N.
It can get confusing but really it is simple. The newest is 802.11 AC and ic used with the newest Mac Computers made available in November 2013. So if you have the newest Airport Extreme that is 802.11ac and the newest computers that are AC compliant your speed will be 5 times faster than anything on the market right now.

Configuring Hardware VPN with Verizon modem/router

Hi-
I'm a Northern VA FIOS subscriber. Verizon provided the following:
Modem: Zyxel Prestige 861
Wireless Router: Actiontec MI424WR
This setup has been working fine.
My job recently gave me a hardware VPN: Netgear ProSafe VPN Firewall, Model FVS338
I'm having a bit of difficulty setting it up the way I'd like.
1) In general, should I connect the HW VPN directly into a free port of the Modem (parallel with the router), or should I connect it into the Router? (Does Verizon support multiple devices connected to the Modem, or do they expect us to connect everything via the router?)
2) I tried a number of different configurations, and the only way I was able to get the hardware VPN to function was to disconnect the router, connect the VPN box in its place, and configure the VPN box to mimic/use the MAC address of the router. This provided connectivity to the work network, but is not acceptable because I need the wireless home network provided by the router as well.
Does anyone have any recommendations for how to set this up properly?
Many thanks.
-Steven
Solved!
Go to Solution.

From actiontec.com
Can I use the Actiontec Gateway or Router to connect to my employers VPN so that I can work from home?
Yes, the Actiontec Routers and Gateways support connecting to VPN servers. By default, Actiontec Routers and Gateways allow Client VPN traffic to pass-through. (the Actiontec will allow a connected PC to "pass-through" and connect to a remote VPN server).
NOTE: Unless otherwise specified, Actiontec Routers and Gateways do not function as VPN endpoints. They cannot make a VPN connection directly to a VPN server, router or client. The reverse is also true, VPN routers, servers and clients cannot make a VPN connection directly to the Actiontec Router itself. (Some of the proprietary VPN applications require specific ports be opened in the Actiontec, for a successful connection. Not all VPNs use the same ports, so determine the ports used by your VPN software before attempting to forward the ports.)
did you set up the pptp port forwarding rules ? you should have l2tp (1701) protocol and pptp (1723) port forwarding protocol for port forwarding.
the preconfigured vpn rules should be fine.

ASA 5505 VPN with backup route

We are looking to set up a site-to-site VPN with a backup over a T1. We have a remote site with a 1841 router. This router has a PTP T1 back to a secondary location with a 2811. Due to location, the only option we had to get additional bandwidth was to have a cable modem installed. We want to set a site-to-site up to our primary location, with a backup route over the T1 in the event the cable modem goes down. We have an ASA 5505 at the remote location, and an ASA 5540 at the primary. In addition, we want to split the traffic across the two connections. Since the wireless controllers are anchored back to the secondary location, we want to send that traffic over the PTP T1 and the rest of the traffic over the VPN. We also need to have a backup route for the wireless traffic to send across the VPN in the event the T1 goes down.

Go to this link and scroll down to Site to Site VPN (L2L) with IOS and Site to Site VPN (L2L) with ASA, you can use the links example depicting your scenario requirements, where one end is dynamic and other static for Ipsec L2L IOS-to-ASA or ASA-to-IOS.
The best solution obiosly is having static IP addressing, make that clear with your client , but these exmaples are very good solution for your problem.
Keep in mind that the DHCP dynamic side will always be the initiator to bring up the tunnel , not the static side.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/prod_configuration_examples_list.html
Regards

Mobile Devices (Android and iOS) cannot Connect to WS 2008 RRAS L2TP VPN with Pre-Shared Key

I have my Windows Server 2008 standard installed with RRAS service and configure with L2TP VPN with pre-shared key. Services such as Active Directory, DHCP and DNS are not installed. The Internet connection doesn't pass through a router to my server machine.
I have the Verizon fios Internet cable plugged in to the server machine directly.
PCs running Windows and Mac OS X can connect to the server without problem. When I tried to connect by using android or iOS mobiles and tablets, they cannot connect to the server. If I change the VPN type to PPTP, the mobile devices can connect successfully
but I would like to use IPSec/L2TP since it's more secure.
I tried so hard to look for the solution for this issue on Internet but I had no luck on that. Can anyone please provide me some help, please ?
Thanks,
CK

Hi CK,
I think we may need to create a policy in Network Policies. Please follow the steps below,
Right click Network Policies, Click New.
Enter the policy name, click Next.
Click Add, select the Day and Time Restrictions, click
Add.
In the Day and Time Restrictions, choose Permited for
all, click OK.
Click Next five times(leave everything default), click
Finish.
Move the policy to top and try to connect with your device.
If issue persists, please make sure that the Connection Requet Policies have been configured properly.
For detailed information about how to create a network policy, please refer to the link below,
Configuring NPS network policies
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd441006.aspx
Best Regards.
Steven Lee
TechNet Community Support

Cisco DSL-Router 876W: VPN with Apple Builtin PPTP??

Hello
I spoke last week to someone about the VPN Problems with several Firewalls and Routers. I hate it to use VPN Tracker, Cisco VPN Client or IP Securitas. I would like to use only the builtin VPN Clients of the Apple OS X.
He suggest me to use Cisco 876 Router. That VPN should support the builtin VPN Client of Apple. Has some member of this forum testet this Router and get the VPN working?
I tried to contact Cisco here in Switzerland, but they have nearly any know-how of Apple Products
Who can help me?
Regards
Gérard

Hello
We had installed the Cisco Router with the VPN Server.
It is possible to make a connection with the builtin PPTP Client of Apple. The Connection is very instable. It disconnect every X minutes.
Ferther I am not able to use all the Apple Remote Desktop funktion. So I see the ARD Client at the VPN Site. Im am able to see which Program is running and are also able to update the ARD Client.
But the Control and Show Funktion off ARD ist not working.
So this solution ist not useable to do Remote Maintanance
Has someone the same problems or an idea why it is not working
Regard
Gérard

I am signed in itunes with me apple id and my iphone /ipad is in the same id but when i go in manage devices its only showing my iphone?

I am signed into itunes with my id and my iphone / ipad are also on this id but when i go in to manage devices its only showing the iphone. Also just up dated my ipad now its saying not charging when its hooked up to the computer?

If the problem persists, you'll probably have to make another apple id, it wont take off any games or music or apps or anything you've bought it will all stay there, i have two apple id's and i don't have a problem with anything.

With brand new iphone 4s when plugging into computer itunes shows a blank page with an apple logo in top left and a small lock in the top right. right clicking iphone under devices shows only eject.

with brand new iphone 4s when plugging into computer itunes shows a blank page with an apple logo in top left and a small lock in the top right. right clicking iphone under devices shows only eject.

Having same issue here:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/19043181#19043181

Router to Router VPN with Overlapping internal networks

Hello Experts,
One quick question. How do I configure a Router to Router VPN with overlapping internal networks???
Both of my internal networks have ip address of 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.10.0
Any link or config will be appreciated. I've been looking but no luck.
Thanks,
Randall

Randall,
Please refer the below URL for configuration details:
Configuring an IPSec Tunnel Between Routers with Duplicate LAN Subnets
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00800b07ed.shtml
Let me know if it helps.
Regards,
Arul
** Please rate all helpful posts **

Setting up site to site vpn with cisco asa 5505

I have a cisco asa 5505 that needs to be set up for site to site vpn to a cisco asa 5500. The 5505 is the remote office and the 5500 is the main office.
IP of remote office router is 71.37.178.142
IP of the main office firewall is 209.117.141.82
Can someone tell me if my config is correct, this is the first time I am setting this up and it can not be tested until I set it up at the remote office. I would rather know its correct before I go.
ciscoasa# show run
: Saved
ASA Version 7.2(4)
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name default.domain.invalid
enable password TMACBloMlcBsq1kp encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address dhcp setroute
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
interface Ethernet0/2
interface Ethernet0/3
interface Ethernet0/4
interface Ethernet0/5
interface Ethernet0/6
interface Ethernet0/7
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name default.domain.invalid
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip host 71.37.178.142 host 209.117.141.82
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 host 209.117.141.82
access-list inside_nat0_outbound extended permit ip host 71.37.178.142 host 209.117.141.82
pager lines 24
logging asdm informational
mtu inside 1500
mtu outside 1500
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
asdm image disk0:/asdm-524.bin
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list inside_nat0_outbound
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
http server enable
http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 inside
no snmp-server location
no snmp-server contact
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto map outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
crypto map outside_map 1 set pfs group5
crypto map outside_map 1 set peer 209.117.141.82
crypto map outside_map 1 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA
crypto map outside_map interface outside
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 86400
telnet timeout 5
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
vpdn username [email protected] password ********* store-local
dhcpd auto_config outside
dhcpd address 192.168.1.2-192.168.1.129 inside
dhcpd enable inside
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
policy-map type inspect dns preset_dns_map
parameters
message-length maximum 512
policy-map global_policy
class inspection_default
inspect dns preset_dns_map
inspect ftp
inspect h323 h225
inspect h323 ras
inspect rsh
inspect rtsp
inspect esmtp
inspect sqlnet
inspect skinny
inspect sunrpc
inspect xdmcp
inspect sip
inspect netbios
inspect tftp
service-policy global_policy global
prompt hostname context
Cryptochecksum:7e338fb2bf32a9ceb89560b314a5ef6c
: end
ciscoasa#
Thanks!

Hi Mandy,
By using following access list define Peer IP as source and destination
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip host 71.37.178.142 host 209.117.141.82
you are not defining the interesting traffic / subnets from both ends.
Make some number ACL 101 as you do not have to write the extended keyword then if you like as follows, or else NAME aCL will also work:
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 101 remark CCP_ACL Category=4 access-list 101 remark IPSEC Rule
!.1..source subnet(called local encryption domain) at your end 192.168.200.0
!..2.and destination subnet(called remote encryption domain)at other end 192.168.100.0 !.3..I mean you have to define what subnets you need to communicate between which are behind these firewalls
!..4...Local Subnets behind IP of the main office firewall is 209.117.141.82 say
!...at your end 192.168.200.0
!..5.Remote Subnets behind IP of remote office router is 71.37.178.142 say
!...at other end 192.168.100.0
Please use Baisc Steps as follows:
A. Configuration in your MAIN office having IP = 209.117.141.82 (follow step 1 to 6)
Step 1.
Define Crypto ACL/ mirror ACL for other end (change source to destination and destination to source in other side router or VPN device and thats why they are called mirror ACL/ or also called Proxy ID or also called Proxy ACL, your interesting traffic , that you want to encrypt / trave/enter in the tunnel)
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended ip 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255
Step 2.
Config ISAKMP Policy with minimum 4 parameters are to be config for
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share ---> Ist parameter of setting Authentication type ISAKMP Policy is OK
encryption aes-256   --->2nd parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
hash sha   ---> 3rd parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
group 5 ---> 4th parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
lifetime 86400 ------ > this 5th parameter is optional , and will negotiate for the less value at either end or by default is will be taken 86400
Step 3.
Define Preshared key or PKI which you will use with other side Peer address 71.37.178.142, either key type 0 is Plain text anyone can see it over internet, or use key type 6 for encrypted key , say your password is CISCO123
Here in your case in step 2 Authentication is using PSK, looks you have not defines Password
Use following command:
crypto isakmp key 0 CISCO123 address 71.37.178.142
or , but not both
crypto isakmp key 6 CISCO123 address71.37.178.142
step 4.
Define Transform set , which will be used for phase 2 tunnel parameters, if you use ESP it can have to sets one cor encryption and other for Authentication.
Here is yours one:
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
this is correct but give name somthing easier to remember /distinguish it is a transform set , like TSET1 instead of ESP-AES-256-SHA ,try following (here you are using ESP so for encryption we use first set as esp-des and for authentication we use second set esp-sha-hmac)
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 esp-des esp-sha-hmac
or
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
Suppose you are using only AH then as AH does not support encryption or confidentiality hence it always use onle one set not 2 sets like ESP(remember the difference) say for example only one set for auth etc but no set for encryption hence AH have no such sets like ah-des or ah-3des or ah-aes, it has only second set for authentication like
ah-sha-hmac or ah-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 ah-sha-hmac
or
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 ah-md5-hmac
Step 5.
Now configure Crypto MAP as follows and only one CMPA can be applied to OUTSIDE Interface as VPN tunnel is alsways applied for traffic from inside subnets to outside subnets and only once Cryptomap can be applied to OUTSIDE Interface and hence for several VPN peers from different vendors we use seq no 10, 2 30 for different tunnels in one single CMAP:
crypto map ipsec-isakmp
1. Define peer -- called WHO to set tunnel with
2. Define or call WHICH - Transform Set
3. Define WHAT to call interesting traffic define in your ACL or Proxy ID or Proxy ACL in step 1 using match address
Like in your case it is but ipsec-isakmp keyword missing in the ;ast
crypto map outside_map 10 ipsec-isakmp
1. set peer 209.117.141.82 -----> is correct as this is your other side peer called WHO in my step
2. set transform-set TSET1 -----> is correct as this is WHICH, and only one transform set can be called
!..In you case it is correct
!...set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA (also correct)
3. match address outside_1_cryptomap ---->Name of the extended ACL define as WHAT to pass through this tunnel
4. set pfs group5 (this is optional but if config at one end same has to be config at other side peer as well)
Step 6.
Now apply this one crypto MAP to your OUTSIDE interface always
interface outside
crypto map outside_map
Configure the same but just change ACL on other end in step one by reversing source and destination
and also set the peer IP of this router in other end.
So other side config should look as follows:
B. Configuration in oyur Remote PEER IP having IP = 71.37.178.142 (follow step 7 to 12)
Step 7.
Define Crypto ACL/ mirror ACL for other end (change source to destination and destination to source in other side router or VPN device and thats why they are called mirror ACL/ or also called Proxy ID or also called Proxy ACL, your interesting traffic , that you want to encrypt / trave/enter in the tunnel)
access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended ip 192.168.100.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.200.0 0.0.0.255
Step 8.
Config ISAKMP Policy with minimum 4 parameters are to be config for
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share ---> Ist parameter of setting Authentication type ISAKMP Policy is OK
encryption aes-256   --->2nd parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
hash sha   ---> 3rd parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
group 5 ---> 4th parameter of ISAKMP Policy is OK
lifetime 86400 ------ > this 5th parameter is optional , and will negotiate for the less value at either end or by default is will be taken 86400
Step 9.
Define Preshared key or PKI which you will use with other side Peer address key type 0 is Plain text anyone can see it over internet, or use key type 6 for encrypted key , say your password is CISCO123
Here in your case in step 8 Authentication is using PSK, looks you have not defines Password
Use following command:
crypto isakmp key 0 CISCO123 address 209.117.141.82
or , but not both
crypto isakmp key 6 CISCO123 address 209.117.141.82
step 10.
Define Transform set , which will be used for phase 2 tunnel parameters, if you use ESP it can have to sets one cor encryption and other for Authentication.
Here is yours one:
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
this is correct but give name somthing easier to remember /distinguish it is a transform set , like TSET1 instead of ESP-AES-256-SHA ,try following (here you are using ESP so for encryption we use first set as esp-des and for authentication we use second set esp-sha-hmac)
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 esp-des esp-sha-hmac
or
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
Suppose you are using only AH then as AH does not support encryption or confidentiality hence it always use onle one set not 2 sets like ESP(remember the difference) say for example only one set for auth etc but no set for encryption hence AH have no such sets like ah-des or ah-3des or ah-aes, it has only second set for authentication like
ah-sha-hmac or ah-md5-hmac
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 ah-sha-hmac
or
crypto ipsec transform-set TSET1 ah-md5-hmac
Step 11.
Now configure Crypto MAP as follows and only one CMPA can be applied to OUTSIDE Interface as VPN tunnel is alsways applied for traffic from inside subnets to outside subnets and only once Cryptomap can be applied to OUTSIDE Interface and hence for several VPN peers from different vendors we use seq no 10, 2 30 for different tunnels in one single CMAP:
crypto map    ipsec-isakmp
1. Define peer -- called WHO to set tunnel with
2. Define or call WHICH - Transform Set, only one is permissible
3. Define WHAT to call interesting traffic define in your ACL or Proxy ID or Proxy ACL in step 1 using match address
Like in your case it is but ipsec-isakmp keyword missing in the ;ast
crypto map outside_map 10 ipsec-isakmp
1. set peer 209.117.141.82 -----> is correct as this is your other side peer called WHO in my step
2. set transform-set TSET1 -----> is correct as this is WHICH, and only one transform set can be called
!..In you case it is correct
!...set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA (also correct)
3. match address outside_1_cryptomap ---->Name of the extended ACL define as WHAT to pass through this tunnel
4. set pfs group5 (this is optional but if config at one end same has to be config at other side peer as well)
Step 12.
Now apply this one crypto MAP to your OUTSIDE interface always
interface outside
crypto map outside_map
Now initite a ping
Here is for your summary:
IPSec: Site to Site - Routers
Configuration Steps
Phase 1
Step 1: Configure Mirrored ACL/Crypto ACL       for Interesting Traffic
Step 2: Configure ISAKMP Policy
Step 3: Configure ISAKMP Key
Phase 2
Step 4: Configure Transform Set
Step 5: Configure Crypto Map
Step 6: Apply Crypto Map to an Interface
To debug for Phase 1 and Phase 2. Store it in buffer without displaying logs on terminal.
Router#debug crpyto isakmp
Router#debug crpyto ipsec
Router(config)# logging buffer 7
Router(config)# logging buffer 99999
Router(config)# logging console 6
Router# clear logging
Configuration
In R1:
(config)# access-list 101 permit ipo host 10.1.1.1 host      10.1.2.1
(config)# crypto isakmp policy 10
(config-policy)# encryption 3des
(config-policy)# authentication pre-share
(config-policy)# group 2
(config-policy)# hash sha1
(config)# crypto isakmp key 0 cisco address 2.2.2.1
(config)# crypto ipsec transform-set TSET esp-3des      sha-aes-hmac
(config)# crypto map CMAP 10 ipsec-isakmp
(config-crypto-map)# set peer 2.2.2.1
(config-crypto-map)# match address 101
(config-crypto-map)# set transform-set TSET
(config)# int f0/0
(config-if)# crypto map CMAP
Similarly in R2
Verification Commands
#show crypto isakmp SA
#show crypto ipsec SA
Change to Transport Mode, add the following command in Step 4:
(config-tranform-set)# mode transport
Even after doing this change, the ipsec negotiation will still be done through tunnel mode if pinged from Loopback to Loopback. To overcome this we make changes to ACL.
Change to Aggressive Mode, replace the Step 3 command with these commands in R1:
(config)# crypto isakmp peer address 2.2.2.1
(config-peer)# set aggressive-mode password cisco
(config-peer)# set aggressive-mode clien-endpoint       ipv4-address 2.2.2.1
Similarly on R2.
The below process is for the negotiation using RSA-SIG (PKI) as authentication type
Debug Process:
After we debug, we can see the negotiation between the two peers. The first packet of the interesting traffic triggers the ISAKMP (Phase1) negotiation. Important messages are marked in BOLD and explanation in RED
R2(config)#do ping 10.1.1.1 so lo0 // Interesting Traffic
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 1.1.1.1, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 2.2.2.2
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL) // Router tried to find any IPSec SA matching the outgoing connection but no valid SA has been found in Security Association Database (SADB)
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for 20.1.1.10, peer port 500
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP: New peer created peer = 0x46519678 peer_handle = 0x8000000D
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP: Locking peer struct 0x46519678, refcount 1 for isakmp_initiator
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0):insert sa successfully sa = 4542B818
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0):Can not start Aggressive mode, trying Main mode. // Not an error. By default it is configured for Main Mode
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0):No pre-shared key with 20.1.1.10! // Since we are using RSA Signature, this message. If we use pre-share, this is where it would indicate so!
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-rfc3947 ID
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-07 ID
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-03 ID
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-02 ID
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_IPSEC, IKE_SA_REQ_MM
Mar 2 16:18:42.939: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_READY New State = IKE_I_MM1
Mar 2 16:18:42.943: ISAKMP:(0): beginning Main Mode exchange
Mar 2 16:18:42.943: ISAKMP:(0): sending packet to 20.1.1.10 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_NO_STATE // Sending ISAKMP Policy to peer
Mar 2 16:18:42.943: ISAKMP:(0):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Mar 2 16:18:42.943: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 20.1.1.10 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_NO_STATE // Sending ISAKMP Policy to peer
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM1 New State = IKE_I_MM2
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): processing SA payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 123 mismatch // Do not worry about this! Not an ERROR!
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v2
Mar 2 16:18:42.947:.!!!!
Success rate is 80 percent (4/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 1/2/4 ms
R2(config)# ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): processing IKE frag vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Support for IKE Fragmentation not enabled
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP : Scanning profiles for xauth ...
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Checking ISAKMP transform 1 against priority 10 policy
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      encryption 3DES-CBC
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      hash SHA
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      default group 2
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      auth RSA sig
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      life type in seconds
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:      life duration (VPI) of 0x0 0x1 0x51 0x80
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):atts are acceptable. Next payload is 0
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:actual life: 0
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Acceptable atts:life: 0
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa vpi_length:4
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Fill atts in sa life_in_seconds:86400
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0):Returning Actual lifetime: 86400
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0)::Started lifetime timer: 86400.
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 123 mismatch
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): vendor ID is NAT-T v2
Mar 2 16:18:42.947: ISAKMP:(0): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0): processing IKE frag vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Support for IKE Fragmentation not enabled
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM2 New State = IKE_I_MM2
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP (0): constructing CERT_REQ for issuer cn=ca_server OU=cisco C=India S=Karnataka L=Bangalore
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0): sending packet to 20.1.1.10 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_SA_SETUP // Sending Key Exchange Information to peer
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:42.951: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM2 New State = IKE_I_MM3
Mar 2 16:18:42.955: ISAKMP (0): received packet from 20.1.1.10 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_SA_SETUP // Receive key exchange information from peer
Mar 2 16:18:42.955: ISAKMP:(0):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Mar 2 16:18:42.955: ISAKMP:(0):Old State = IKE_I_MM3 New State = IKE_I_MM4
Mar 2 16:18:42.959: ISAKMP:(0): processing KE payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.003: ISAKMP:(0): processing NONCE payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): processing CERT_REQ payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): peer wants a CT_X509_SIGNATURE cert
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): peer wants cert issued by cn=ca_server OU=cisco C=India S=Karnataka L=Bangalore
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: Choosing trustpoint CA_Server as issuer
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): vendor ID is Unity
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but major 180 mismatch
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): vendor ID is XAUTH
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): speaking to another IOS box!
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008):vendor ID seems Unity/DPD but hash mismatch
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP (1008): His hash no match - this node outside NAT
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:received payload type 20
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP (1008): No NAT Found for self or peer
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Mar 2 16:18:43.007: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_I_MM4 New State = IKE_I_MM4
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP:(1008):Send initial contact
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP:(1008):My ID configured as IPv4 Addr, but Addr not in Cert!
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP:(1008):Using FQDN as My ID
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP:(1008):SA is doing RSA signature authentication using id type ID_FQDN
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP (1008): ID payload
          next-payload : 6
          type         : 2
          FQDN name    : R2
          protocol     : 17
          port         : 500
          length       : 10
Mar 2 16:18:43.011: ISAKMP:(1008):Total payload length: 10
Mar 2 16:18:43.019: ISAKMP (1008): constructing CERT payload for hostname=R2+serialNumber=FHK1502F2H8
Mar 2 16:18:43.019: ISAKMP:(1008): using the CA_Server trustpoint's keypair to sign
Mar 2 16:18:43.035: ISAKMP:(1008): sending packet to 20.1.1.10 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
Mar 2 16:18:43.035: ISAKMP:(1008):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Mar 2 16:18:43.035: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:43.035: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_I_MM4 New State = IKE_I_MM5
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP (1008): received packet from 20.1.1.10 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) MM_KEY_EXCH
// "MM_KEY_EXCH" indicates that the peers have exchanged DH Public keys and generated a shared secret!
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP:(1008): processing ID payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP (1008): ID payload
          next-payload : 6
          type         : 2
          FQDN name    : ASA1
          protocol     : 0
          port         : 0
          length       : 12
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP:(0):: peer matches *none* of the profiles // Normal Message! Not an error!
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP:(1008): processing CERT payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.047: ISAKMP:(1008): processing a CT_X509_SIGNATURE cert
Mar 2 16:18:43.051: ISAKMP:(1008): peer's pubkey isn't cached
Mar 2 16:18:43.059: ISAKMP:(1008): Unable to get DN from certificate!
Mar 2 16:18:43.059: ISAKMP:(1008): Cert presented by peer contains no OU field.
Mar 2 16:18:43.059: ISAKMP:(0):: peer matches *none* of the profiles
Mar 2 16:18:43.063: ISAKMP:(1008): processing SIG payload. message ID = 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:received payload type 17
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008): processing vendor id payload
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008): vendor ID is DPD
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):SA authentication status:
          authenticated
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):SA has been authenticated with 20.1.1.10
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP: Trying to insert a peer 40.1.1.1/20.1.1.10/500/, and inserted successfully 46519678. // SA inserted into SADB
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_MM_EXCH
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_I_MM5 New State = IKE_I_MM6
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_MAIN_MODE
Mar 2 16:18:43.067: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_I_MM6 New State = IKE_I_MM6
Mar 2 16:18:43.071: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PROCESS_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:43.071: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_I_MM6 New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:43.071: ISAKMP:(1008):beginning Quick Mode exchange, M-ID of -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.071: ISAKMP:(1008):QM Initiator gets spi
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008): sending packet to 20.1.1.10 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008):Node -1523793378, Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_QM_READY New State = IKE_QM_I_QM1
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008):Input = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_PHASE1_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:43.075: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE New State = IKE_P1_COMPLETE
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP (1008): received packet from 20.1.1.10 dport 500 sport 500 Global (I) QM_IDLE // IPSec Policies
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008): processing HASH payload. message ID = -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008): processing SA payload. message ID = -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008):Checking IPSec proposal 1
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP: transform 1, ESP_3DES
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:   attributes in transform:
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      SA life type in seconds
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      SA life duration (basic) of 3600
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      SA life type in kilobytes
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      SA life duration (VPI) of 0x0 0x46 0x50 0x0
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      encaps is 1 (Tunnel)
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:      authenticator is HMAC-SHA
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008):atts are acceptable. // IPSec attributes are acceptable!
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008): processing NONCE payload. message ID = -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008): processing ID payload. message ID = -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.079: ISAKMP:(1008): processing ID payload. message ID = -1523793378
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008): Creating IPSec SAs
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         inbound SA from 20.1.1.10 to 40.1.1.1 (f/i) 0/ 0
          (proxy 1.1.1.1 to 2.2.2.2)
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         has spi 0xA9A66D46 and conn_id 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         lifetime of 3600 seconds
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         lifetime of 4608000 kilobytes
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         outbound SA from 40.1.1.1 to 20.1.1.10 (f/i) 0/0
        (proxy 2.2.2.2 to 1.1.1.1)
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         has spi 0x2B367FB4 and conn_id 0
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         lifetime of 3600 seconds
Mar 2 16:18:43.083:         lifetime of 4608000 kilobytes
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008): sending packet to 20.1.1.10 my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) QM_IDLE
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008):Sending an IKE IPv4 Packet.
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008):deleting node -1523793378 error FALSE reason "No Error"
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008):Node -1523793378, Input = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_QM_EXCH
Mar 2 16:18:43.083: ISAKMP:(1008):Old State = IKE_QM_I_QM1 New State = IKE_QM_PHASE2_COMPLETE // At this point tunnels are up and ready to pass traffic!
Verification Commands
#show crypto isakmp SA
#show crypto ipsec SA
Kindly rate if you find the explanation useful !!
Best Regards
Sachin Garg

Azure Site to Site VPN with Cisco ASA 5505

I have got Cisco ASA 5505 device (version 9.0(2)). And i cannot connect S2S with azure (azure network alway in "connecting" state). In my cisco log:
IP = 104.40.182.93, Keep-alives configured on but peer does not support keep-alives (type = None)
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xcaaa2a38, mess id 0x1)!
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93,Overriding Initiator's IPSec rekeying duration from 102400000 to 4608000 Kbs
Group = 104.40.182.93, IP = 104.40.182.93, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
I have done all cisco s2s congiguration over standard wizard cos seems your script for 8.x version of asa only?
(Does azure support 9.x version of asa?)
How can i fix it?

Hi,
As of now, we do not have any scripts for Cisco ASA 9x series.
Thank you for your interest in Windows Azure. The Dynamic routing is not supported for the Cisco ASA family of devices.
Unfortunately, a dynamic routing VPN gateway is required for Multi-Site VPN, VNet to VNet, and Point-to-Site.
However, you should be able to setup a site-to-site VPN with Cisco ASA 5505 series security appliance as
demonstrated in this blog:
Step-By-Step: Create a Site-to-Site VPN between your network and Azure
http://blogs.technet.com/b/canitpro/archive/2013/10/09/step-by-step-create-a-site-to-site-vpn-between-your-network-and-azure.aspx
You can refer to this article for Cisco ASA templates for Static routing:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azure/dn133793.aspx
Did you download the VPN configuration file from the dashboard and copy the content of the configuration
file to the Command Line Interface of the Cisco ASDM application? It seems that there is no specified IP address in the access list part and maybe that is why the states message appeared.
According to the
Cisco ASA template, it should be similar to this:
access-list <RP_AccessList>
extended permit ip object-group
<RP_OnPremiseNetwork> object-group <RP_AzureNetwork>
nat (inside,outside) source static <RP_OnPremiseNetwork>
<RP_OnPremiseNetwork> destination static <RP_AzureNetwork>
<RP_AzureNetwork>
Based on my experience, to establish
IPSEC tunnel, you need to allow the ESP protocol and UDP Port 500. Please make sure that the
VPN device cannot be located behind a NAT. Besides, since Cisco ASA templates are not
compatible for dynamic routing, please make sure that you chose the static routing.
Since you configure the VPN device yourself, it's important that you would be familiar with the device and its configuration settings.
Hope this helps you.
Girish Prajwal

ACS Database Replication over VPN with overlapping Network Addresses

We currently have two co-locations each situated in different provinces. We have two ACS servers which we want to deploy at each co-location. All our network equipments are behind PIX/ASA devices. Getting them to replicate over the VPN should be easy but in our case we have overlapping Network Addresses at both ends of the tunnels.
As per Cisco data does not transit a NAT device when the two Cisco Secure ACS servers communicate and a successful database replication can occur only if the secondary ACS server perceives no change in the IP header or content of the data it receives. So that means we will not be able to Implement NAT to achiever this.
Has any one of you faced this problem of replicating ACS Database over the VPN with overlapping Network Addresses and was anyone able to successfully solve this issue using a work around ?
All provided info and comments are greatly appreciated.

I can help with the 3005 setup if you decide to go that route.
You will need to add 2 network list entries under Configuration>Policy Management>Traffic Management>Network Lists.
You will need to configure a local and remote address. The local will be one of the public ip's for the site.(Provided by your ISP)The remote will be the device you are connecting to on the other end.
You will also need to add a Nat Lan to Lan rule under Configuration>Policy Management>Traffic Management>Nat>Lan to Lan.
Use a static Nat type. The rest will look similar to my example.
Source(Local address)Translated(Public Ip Address used in the network local list)Remote(Ip address of the device on the other end)
Now just create an Ipsec lan to lan tunnel. You will need to agree with the ISP on des type and auth type. Use you local and remote networks you created earlier.

Router to PC VPN with device authen only via RSA Sig

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for