Rule-based distribution for opportunities

Hello,
I've configured a rule for opportunity distribution in 'Rule Policies' in SAP CRM Web UI. The rule is shown as 'Active' and 'Released'. However, when I create an opportunity and select the distribution method as 'Rule-Based distribution', then the dropdown the field 'Rule' stays blank and I don't get any options to select a 'Rule'. Please provide your inputs on how the rule I created can be made available for an opportunity.
Regards,
Aditya Mishra

Hi Aditya,
Have you configured a service profile and assigned your rule policy to it? You can set this up in:
SPRO --> E-mail Response Management System --> Service Manager --> Define Service Manager Profiles
1. Create a new service profile
2. Add in service ID DD_RE
3. Under property ID add in CONTEXT using value DD_OPPORTUNITY
4. Under property ID add in POLICY using the rule policy ID you created.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
David.

Similar Messages

Rule Based distribution of leads

Hi
For maintaining the rules for rule- based distribution of leads, which business roles are relevant? Can we do it by using roles marketpro or salespro ?? Please guide.
Regards
Aakshi Suri

hi
can you plz explain your question elaborately
if you to use business role----
den used MARKETINGPRO bt before using the b.role convert into "z-transaction" den use it
thanking you
debi prasad

APO Rule based ATP for RA Repair

Hey,
Could you please help me to turn on rule based ATP for document type RA outbound?
The senario is as follows:
Customer returns to my company the product.
My company has multiple locations (plants) for replacement products. I would like to determine the replacement product location with rule-based ATP. We use rule-based ATP for the sales site w/o issues.
I set up in configuration:
ZRA (copy of RA) with business transaction RMA(to trigger the rule based ATP)
Assigned ZRA / Item usage = R104/ PSTYV= ZXNN (item category allows rule based ATP).
ZRA     ZNO1     R104     IRRA     ZXNN
I also did the below rules based ATP item catgegory determination:
AUART        MTPOS         VWPOS        UEPST         PSTYV
ZRA     ZNO1     APO0     ZTP1     ZXNN
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1          ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO1     ZXNN     ZTP1
ZRA     ZNO1     APO2     ZTP1     ZXNN
When I create with VA01 a ZRA order and add a replacement plant then I get this message:
The ATP rules are not called up for item 000030 - Message no. /SAPAPO/ATP147
But when I go from the "APO Availability Check" view to the Rule then I see my rules determined.
The detail message also says that the system "things" the line was already delivered, which is not the case.
Could you please tell me if it is possible to combine rule-based ATP with the RA replacement process and if yes how to do it?
Thanks,
Sabine

Check OSS Note 571044 - RBA: Use of calculation profiles and rules
Regards,

Remove message from queue for rule based subscriber

Hi ,
I created a rule based subscription for one xx_Queue when i am dequeing trying dequeue.conditions like REMOVE it's saying i can mention either dequeue condition or rule based .So if i didn't give REMOVE condition i am able to dequeue but next time when i run again the old message is coming because the message was not removed from queue.So how can i approach that one?

No version number.
No DDL.
And you want us to guess at the actual message when you write: "it's saying i can mention either dequeue condition or rule based."
Not possible.
Unless you can see one of us standing behind your chair reading your monitor ... you need to provide every single relevant unknown.
If you do not know what is relevant, like the actual message, ask a coworker to help you.

Rules based ATP to Consider Checking Horizon

Hello SAP Experts,
I am a novice to GATP functionality. I have one scenario tried to work on it and Standard SAP system doesn't seem to work this way.
Rules based ATP for location Determination is used for order confirmation.
Loc A   Mat 1 500 Pcs
Loc B   Mat 1 200 Pcs
Rule 1 LocA --> Loc B
Order comes in for Mat 1 at location A for 1000 Pcs and confirmation was given for 700 Pcs out of which 200 Pcs will be sourced from Loc B. I'm trying to confirm remaining 300 at the end of Checking horizon as per Customer requirement. Please suggest a way to acheive this.
Regards,
Priyanka

Hi,
You will start from ECC, Material master MRP3 view   MARC-WZEIT   Total replenishment lead time (in workdays).
In APO , SPRO--GATP-Maintain check control - make sure that ATP group and business event example 01 and A should have "consider Checking horizon" .
RLT from R3 will become Checking horizon in product master in APO. In APO product master ATP tab CHKHOR is the field name.
Make sure that in the rules -- calculation profile -allowed delay is not maintained or should not be less than RLT /Checking horizon.
Thanks,
Pavan Verma

How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?

Hi all expertise,
How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?
If cost based it is using, what methods are need to use to minimize the cost when database is running? And which tables I can see the performance of the database?
Thanks
Amy

how to see database setting ?
use this
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 1
optimizer_features_enable string 9.2.0
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 2000
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
choose means if table statistics is available then it will use cost
else
use rule based optimizer
for seeing performnace of table use
set autotrace on
and run your query
if it doen't show cost.it means it use rule based
for using cost based
u will calculate table statistics
9i
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('owner','table');
8i
analyze table <table_name> compute statistics;
hope it will help you
kuljeet pal singh

Questions on Rules-Based ATP and Purchase Requisitions for STOs

Hello experts,
We are working on rules-based ATP configuration and have several questions about the functionality. Iu2019m hoping that some of you are using this functionality and can help give us direction.
In our environment we have multiple distribution centers and multiple manufacturing plants. We want to confirm sales orders against stock and production orders in any of those plants, depending on the locations that have stock or planned production. For example, we will place a sales order against plant A. If there is not enough stock in plant A then rules-based ATP will use location determination to check in plant B, then C. The scope of check on the ATP check will include stock and released production orders. We will configure plant A as the u201Cconsolidation locationu201D so if stock is found in plants B or C then stock transport orders will automatically be created to move the stock to plant A before shipping to the customer.
We have configured rules-based ATP and this functionality is working well in our Development system. The ATP check is executed and uses the rules-based ATP to find eligible stock in other plants. The system is also creating purchase requisitions to move the stock to the consolidation plant.
Our first concern is that there doesnu2019t appear to be any firm linkage between the sales order and the resulting purchase requisition. For example, if we create sales order 123 for plant A and the rules-based ATP finds stock in plant B it automatically creates a purchase requisition 987 to move the stock from plant B to plant A. However, there doesnu2019t appear to be a linkage between sales order 123 and purchase requisition 987. For instance, if we delete sales order 123 the purchase requisition doesnu2019t get deleted.
Our second concern is that the quantity on the purchase requisition can still be confirmed against later sales orders. For example, say the above scenario resulted in a purchase requisition 987 that consumed all the stock available in plant B. We then create a second sales order 456 for the same product. Plant A is out of stock so the rules-based ATP looks in plant B. We would expect that plant B would also not have any stock because itu2019s all been consumed by the purchase requisition. Instead, the system creates a second purchase requisition to move quantity from plant B to plant A. Itu2019s as if the system doesnu2019t realize that the purchase requisition 987 is already planning to move stock out of plant B.
Does anyone have any thoughts or suggestions on these two scenarios? Is there a way to configure the system so there is a hard linkage between the sales order and the purchase requisition so that if the sales order is deleted then the purchase requisition is also deleted? Should ATP realize that purchase orders are consuming inventory and not allow later sales orders to confirm against that same inventory? Any advice or experience would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
David Eady
Application Delivery Team Lead
Propex, Inc.

Hi,
The scheduling is done in SCM, and from there, whenever the RBA is triggered, the calculation is done always with the old route in SCM. Until you get back to R/3 this is when your route is determined. But the ATP check is always with the original route. So the idea would be that you change the values of the route while still in APO, this is possible via the user exit. Should be done in scheduling in APO.
Hope this information is helpful.
Regards,
Tibor

Wrong GL Dates for Distributions for Credit Memo with Rules

Hi all
Using Autoinvoice, Ive created Invoice with Invoice date 17-APR-08 and 12 month payment term. Invoice line has amount of $460 and deferred accounting rule of type "Accounting, Fixed Duration". Rule start date is 17-APR-08 and duration is 1.
I run the Revenue Recognition and then Revenue Adjustment API "ar_revenueadjust_pub.earn_revenue" to create revenue account schedule for 12 month period based on business rules. Now I issue credit memo of $60 on 18-JUN-08 with LIFO rule method and LIFO split term method, against the above invoice line.
I run revenue recognition, go to the credit memo distributions. All the distributions show GL Date as 17-APR-08 with correct percentages and amount as in the original invoice line.
Can anyone help me understand why all distributions of credit memo have same gl date?

Hi Nagamohan,
Credit Memo is applied to invoice line with deferred rule.
If I issue credit memo on 18-JUN-08 with LIFO against a Invoice line which uses "Daily Revenue - All Periods" rule, the distributions show
GL Date - Dr - Cr - Amount
17-FEB-09 REV UNEARN 0.77
17-MAR-09 REV UNEARN 39.07
16-MAR-09 REV UNEARN 20.16
The above amounts are exactly the reverse distributions as in Original Invoice line.
I was expecting the same thing to happen in Deferred Fixed rule, but the only difference is for Fixed rule I cannot populate Rule_End_Date through Autoinvoice or manually.
Kishore.
Message was edited by:
chakoo

Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution

Hello dear PSM Experts,
In our project (using ECC6), we want to split in a PO the FM account assignment between several lines, according to the fund type of the initial account assignment (based from an referenced earmarked document).
After looking in the customizing and in ECC6 PSM Public Sector Management
Release Notes, we are investigating Documentation about Rule-Based Account Assignment Distribution.
Can anybody provides me a link to a documentation, if any?
Otherwise, I would greatly appreciate any help to use this functionality.
Regards,
François

Hello,
I am configuring this functionality currently in an ECC 6.0 environment for a public sector organization and have had an issue with the FMSPLITMAINT transaction. When attempting to create a rule the 'create' 'copy' 'change' options are not available.
Configuration has already been completed for Field Profiles, Action Profiles, & Rule Groups.
The olny documentation I have been able to find was an appendix to the SAP Grants Management - Grantee course.
Please respond if you there is any additional documentation which may be of assistance. I have already tried notes: 991661 and 991962.
Thank you

Rule based ATP is not working for Components

Hi All,
Our requirement is to do availability check through APO for Sales order created in ECC,so we are using gATP.
Requirement: We are creating salesorder for BOM header (Sales BOM) and avaialbility check should happen for components i.e. Product avalaibility & Rule based substitution.
Issue: Product availiabilty is working for components but rules based substituion is working, mean Rules are not getting determind for components.
Settings:
- Header doesnot exist in APO and compnents do exist in APO
- Availability check is not enabled for header item category and enabled for Item category for components
- Rules have been created for Components in APO
- Rule base ATP is activated in Check instructions
We have also tried MATP for this i.e. PPM created in APO but still didn't get the desired result.
If we create salesorder for the component material directly then Rule based ATP is happening, so for components Rule based ATP is not working.
How do we enable enable Rulesbased ATP for components, i mean is there any different way to do the same.
Thanks for help.
Regards,
Jagadeesh

Hi Jagdeesh,
If you are creating BOM in ECC and CIFing PPM of FG/Header material to APO, I think you need to CIF Header material, too, with material integration model.
Please include header material in you integration models for material, SO and ATP check as well.
For component availability check, you can use MATP; but for MATP, FG should be in APO. You need not to CIF any receipts of FG (stock, planned orders, POs etc), so that MATP will be triggered directly. Then maintaining Rules for RMs will enable to select available RMs according to the rule created.
Regards,
Bipin

Improving performace for a Rule Based Optimizer DB

Hi,
I am looking for information on improving the current performance of an ancient 35GB Oracle 7.3.4 using RULE based optimizer mode. It is using 160 MB SGA and the physical memory on the system is 512MB RAM.
As of now, all the major tasks which take time, are run after peak hours so that the 130 user sessions are not affected significantly.
But recently am told some procedures take too long to execute ( procedure has to do with truncating tables and re-populating data into it ) and I do see 54% of the pie chart for WAITS are for "sequential reads" followed by "scattered reads" of 36%. There are a couple of large tables of around 4GB in this DB.
Autotrace doesn't help me much in terms of getting an explain plan of slow queries since COST option doesnt show up and am trying to find ways of improving the performance of DB in general.
Apart from the "redo log space requests" which I run into frequently (which btw is something I am trying to resolve ..thanks to some of you) I dont see much info on exactly how to proceed.
Is there any info that I can look towards in terms of improving performance on this rule based optimizer DB ? Or is identifying the top sql's in terms of buffer gets the only way to tune ?
Thank you for any suggestions provided.

Thanks Hemant.
This is for a 15 minute internal under moderate load early this morning.
Statistic                   Total        Per Transact Per Logon    Per Second
CR blocks created                    275          .95         5.19          .29
Current blocks converted fo           10          .03          .19          .01
DBWR buffers scanned               74600       258.13      1407.55        78.44
DBWR free buffers found            74251       256.92      1400.96        78.08
DBWR lru scans                       607          2.1        11.45          .64
DBWR make free requests              607          2.1        11.45          .64
DBWR summed scan depth             74600       258.13      1407.55        78.44
DBWR timeouts                        273          .94         5.15          .29
OS Integral shared text siz   1362952204   4716097.59 25716079.32   1433177.92
OS Integral unshared data s    308759380   1068371.56   5825648.68    324668.12
OS Involuntary context swit       310493      1074.37      5858.36       326.49
OS Maximum resident set siz       339968      1176.36      6414.49       357.48
OS Page faults                      3434        11.88        64.79         3.61
OS Page reclaims                    6272         21.7       118.34          6.6
OS System time used                19157        66.29       361.45        20.14
OS User time used                 195036       674.87      3679.92       205.09
OS Voluntary context switch        21586        74.69       407.28         22.7
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from         16250        56.23        306.6        17.09
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from           424         1.47            8          .45
background timeouts                  646         2.24        12.19          .68
bytes received via SQL*Net        814224      2817.38     15362.72       856.18
bytes received via SQL*Net         24470        84.67        461.7        25.73
bytes sent via SQL*Net to c       832836      2881.79     15713.89       875.75
bytes sent via SQL*Net to d        42713        147.8       805.91        44.91
calls to get snapshot scn:         17103        59.18        322.7        17.98
calls to kcmgas                      381         1.32         7.19           .4
calls to kcmgcs                      228          .79          4.3          .24
calls to kcmgrs                    20845        72.13        393.3        21.92
cleanouts and rollbacks - c           86           .3         1.62          .09
cleanouts only - consistent           40          .14          .75          .04
cluster key scan block gets         1051         3.64        19.83         1.11
cluster key scans                    376          1.3         7.09           .4
commit cleanout failures: c           18          .06          .34          .02
commit cleanout number succ         2406         8.33         45.4         2.53
consistent changes                   588         2.03        11.09          .62
consistent gets                   929408      3215.94        17536        977.3
cursor authentications              1746         6.04        32.94         1.84
data blocks consistent read          588         2.03        11.09          .62
db block changes                   20613        71.33       388.92        21.68
db block gets                      40646       140.64       766.91        42.74
deferred (CURRENT) block cl          668         2.31         12.6           .7
dirty buffers inspected                3          .01          .06            0
enqueue conversions                  424         1.47            8          .45
enqueue releases                    1981         6.85        37.38         2.08
enqueue requests                    1977         6.84         37.3         2.08
execute count                      20691         71.6        390.4        21.76
free buffer inspected               2264         7.83        42.72         2.38
free buffer requested             490899      1698.61      9262.25       516.19
immediate (CR) block cleano          126          .44         2.38          .13
immediate (CURRENT) block c          658         2.28        12.42          .69
logons cumulative                     53          .18            1          .06
logons current                         1            0          .02            0
messages received                    963         3.33        18.17         1.01
messages sent                        963         3.33        18.17         1.01
no work - consistent read g       905734      3134.03     17089.32        952.4
opened cursors cumulative           2701         9.35        50.96         2.84
opened cursors current               147          .51         2.77          .15
parse count                         2733         9.46        51.57         2.87
physical reads                    490258      1696.39      9250.15       515.52
physical writes                     2265         7.84        42.74         2.38
recursive calls                    37296       129.05        703.7        39.22
redo blocks written                 5222        18.07        98.53         5.49
redo entries                       10575        36.59       199.53        11.12
redo size                        2498156      8644.14     47135.02      2626.87
redo small copies                  10575        36.59       199.53        11.12
redo synch writes                    238          .82         4.49          .25
redo wastage                      104974       363.23      1980.64       110.38
redo writes                          422         1.46         7.96          .44
rollback changes - undo rec            1            0          .02            0
rollbacks only - consistent          200          .69         3.77          .21
session logical reads             969453      3354.51     18291.57       1019.4
session pga memory              35597936    123176.25    671659.17     37432.11
session pga memory max          35579576    123112.72    671312.75      37412.8
session uga memory               2729196      9443.58     51494.26      2869.82
session uga memory max          20580712     71213.54    388315.32     21641.13
sorts (memory)                      1091         3.78        20.58         1.15
sorts (rows)                       12249        42.38       231.11        12.88
table fetch by rowid               57246       198.08      1080.11         60.2
table fetch continued row            111          .38         2.09          .12
table scan blocks gotten          763421       2641.6     14404.17       802.76
table scan rows gotten          13740187      47543.9    259248.81     14448.15
table scans (long tables)            902         3.12        17.02          .95
table scans (short tables)          4614        15.97        87.06         4.85
total number commit cleanou         2489         8.61        46.96         2.62
transaction rollbacks                  1            0          .02            0
user calls                         15266        52.82       288.04        16.05
user commits                         289            1         5.45           .3
user rollbacks                        23          .08          .43          .02
write requests                       331         1.15         6.25          .35Wait Events :
Event Name                       Count         Total Time    Avg Time
SQL*Net break/reset to client                7             0             0
SQL*Net message from client              16383             0             0
SQL*Net message from dblink                424             0             0
SQL*Net message to client                16380             0             0
SQL*Net message to dblink                  424             0             0
SQL*Net more data from client                1             0             0
SQL*Net more data to client                 24             0             0
buffer busy waits                          169             0             0
control file sequential read                55             0             0
db file scattered read                   74788             0             0
db file sequential read                 176241             0             0
latch free                                6134             0             0
log file sync                              225             0             0
rdbms ipc message                           10             0             0
write complete waits                         4             0             0I did enable the timed_stats for the session but dont know why the times are 0's. Since I cant bounce the instance until weekend, cant enable the parameter in init.ora as well.

Rule based monitors (RZ20) - Show system availability for selected systems

Hi experts,
I'm new with CCMS monitoring and need an advice for rule based monitors.
I want to create three alert monitors (RZ20). One for our developing systems, one for our quality assurance systems and one to monitor our production systems.
For the start, I want to show data in each of this monitor for free space of the filesytems (MTE class: "FilesystemFreeSpace"), for users which are locked out (MTE class "R3SyslogSecurity") and for the availabilty of the ABAP systems (MTE class "Availability_SysPercent_ABAP").
I started to create the monitor for our developing system and got a problem. I started with the rule "CCMS_DEFINE_R3_SYSTEMS" to select our developing systems "HRT", "CRT" and so on. Under this nodes, I defined the mte classes ("CCMS_GET_MTE_BY_CLASS") which needs to be shown: "FilesystemFreeSpace", "R3SyslogSecurity" and "Availability_SysPercent_ABAP".
When I checked the results, I was able to see the free space of the filesystems and whether a user has been locked out. Unfortunately, I recognized that the availability is not shown. Instead there is the message "No MTEs currently available".
I'm aware, the availability cannot be shown on this way, since the agents are part of the central monitoring system and hence i need to choose the central system for "CCMS_DEFINE_R3_SYSTEMS". However I'd like to show the availability separated for each system under "HRT", "CRT" and so on. That means for example, there should me a node "HRT", which contains the free space of the filesystems, whether users are locked out, and the availability for the system.
It's not a problem to get a solution with a static monitor. I simply create a virtual node "HRT" and tick the checkbox under "<central system>, ..., <availability>, <hrt> ..."
However, I'd like to use rule based monitor to keep the effort at a minimum by not ticking thousand of check-boxes when I expand the monitored objects.
I also tried to use the rule "CCMS_GET_AVAILABILITY_FOR_SYSTEM", but it doesn't work and SAP documentations say "This rule is reserved by SAP for later use".
Does anybody know a solution for my problem?
In addition, I've got one more question concerning rule based monitors: If I want to create a monitor for my developing systems, I'll not be able to choose "<all>" for "CCMS_DEFINE_R3_SYSTEMS". Do I need to create "CCMS_DEFINE_R3_SYSTEMS" for each system separately? Or is there another possible way?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Bob
Edited by: Bob Norwich on Oct 17, 2010 12:04 PM
I read something about logical MTE classes: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/31/5462405c910272e10000000a155106/frameset.htm --> Does I need to use this?

Sorry Sean for my very late anwser.
I was very busy in my company.
Yes, I had tried you suggestion but it didn't work for me.
The problem is, that the Agent "CCMSPING" is part of the central monitoring system by definition.
Furthermore I tried to copy the default availabiliy monitor to look how it is definied. It didn't help.
I made the decision to define my monitor differently (an extra monitor for the availability for all system) and replace this temporalily solution when ""CCMS_GET_AVAILABILITY_FOR_SYSTEM" will be available.
The situation is not so bad after all.
Thx for your help. I appreciate it!!
Bob

Delivery & Invoice for Rules based ATP check materials

Hi All,
We have an query regarding rules based ATP , delivery & Invoicing . When we create a SO ( say we have only one line item 10 , with quantity 100 created at Plant P1 , item category TAN ) , ATP confirmation happens ,based on the stock & receipts ( say we have confirmation of 60 units at Plant P1 ) . Since we are using RBATP , the remaining 40 quantity is being confirmed at Plant P2. Now the order will have multiple line items 10 the original line item but with different item category TAPA and also two more line items for quantity of 60 & 40 for plants P1 & Plants P2 respectively with item category TAN. This is the standard functionality.
My question is , Will there be any issues with respect to delivery & Invoicing as there are multiple plants and different item categories.
Thanks & Regards
Surendra

Hi,
With respect to delivery you will have differnt delivey document because your shipping point is going to be different.
Regarding Billing you can combine the differnet delivey document if the delivery document created using the sales order contains the same payer,payment terms, billing date,material group and Incoterms.
Apart from the above you will not face anyproblem by having 2 diiferent item category for the above said scenario..
Regards,
V.Devaselvam.

BADI for MDGF rule based workflow

Hi Experts,
I am really struggling to get a badi that can route on field assigned in my single and agent decision tables. I have used the standard BADI that was provided in RDS documentation for BP and Materials and just tried to change the entity name and field names without success.
Can anyone please provide me with an example where someone has used this to route on field in finance.
I am trying to route on Segment for Profit center
Your help will be highly appreciated
Thanks and best regards
Riaan

Hi Abdullah,
I am using an existing attribute in the data model OG in the entity PCTR. The field name is PCTRSEG and element is fb_segment. In my rule based workflow in the Single decision table I have added fb_segment and I have populated the values against step 00. I have also updated my agent decision table with the fb_segment value.
I am attaching the BADI that I am struggeling with.
The service name for the change request is in the BADI filter. Thus when the requestor submit the Badi will be called and it will route to the person assigned in my agent decision table against the relevant segment..
My problem is the following:
The issue is that I don't know where I should maintain PCTRSEG and where I should maintain fb_segment in the BADI. Thus, where do I use the attribute name from the data model and where do I use the data element from the model.
When the requestor submit the request it does not go to the next approver and I get the error" Agent could not be determined"
I found ,when I change any of the values for the segment in the single and agent decision tables to not equal, example <> 1001 that the workflow works but all change requests will go to the same person.
Thus my assumption is that something might be wrong with the BADI
Your help will be highly appreciated
Thanks
Riaan
Please find Badi below
method IF_USMD_SSW_RULE_CNTX_PREPARE~PREPARE_RULE_CONTEXT.
    DATA:
      lo_crequest      TYPE
REF TO if_usmd_crequest_api,
      lt_entities      TYPEusmd_t_crequest_entity,
      ls_entity        TYPE usmd_s_crequest_entity,
      lr_table         TYPE REF TO data,
      lt_sel           TYPE usmd_ts_sel,
      ls_sel           TYPE usmd_s_sel,
      lv_brf_expr_id   TYPEif_fdt_types=>id,
      ls_context       TYPEusmd_s_fdt_context_value,
      lv_exit          TYPE c.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <lt_fin_int>
TYPE ANY TABLE,
                 <ld_fin_int> TYPE
any,
                 <pctrseg>      TYPEfb_segment,
                 <value>      TYPE
any.
* Prepare export parameters
CLEAR et_message.
CLEAR et_rule_context_value.
* Get the CR API for the current
CR
CALL METHOD cl_usmd_crequest_api=>get_instance
    EXPORTING
      iv_crequest          = iv_cr_number
    IMPORTING
      re_inst_crequest_api = lo_crequest.
* Create data instance of the
entity PCTR for read access
CALL METHOD lo_crequest->create_data_reference
    EXPORTING
      iv_entity    ='PCTR'
      i_struct     =if_usmd_model=>gc_struct_key_attr
    IMPORTING
      er_table     =lr_table
      et_message   =et_message.
CHECK et_message IS
INITIAL.
ASSIGN lr_table->*
TO <lt_fin_int>.
* Get the instance keys for entity
type PCTR
CALL METHOD lo_crequest->read_objectlist
    EXPORTING
      iv_entity_type = 'PCTR'
    IMPORTING
      et_entity      = lt_entities
      et_message     =et_message.
CHECK et_message IS INITIAL.
* Read the PCTR entity of the one
and only PCTR of the CR
READ TABLE lt_entities INTOls_entity INDEX 1.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
ls_sel-fieldname ='PCTRSEG'.
ls_sel-sign = 'I'.
ls_sel-option = 'EQ'.
ls_sel-low    = ls_entity-usmd_value.
APPEND ls_sel TO lt_sel.
CALL METHOD lo_crequest->read_value
    EXPORTING
      i_fieldname      = 'PCTRSEG'
      it_sel           = lt_sel
      if_edition_logic = abap_false
    IMPORTING
      et_data          = <lt_fin_int>
      et_message       = et_message.
* Get the one and only FB_SEGMENT
of the one PCTR in the CR
LOOP AT <lt_fin_int> ASSIGNING <ld_fin_int>.
    ASSIGN COMPONENT 'PCTRSEG'OF STRUCTURE <ld_fin_int>
TO <pctrseg>.
    EXIT.
ENDLOOP.
CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
* fill out the return table
get_element_id(
    EXPORTING
      iv_cr_type = lo_crequest->ds_crequest-usmd_creq_type
      iv_name    ='PCTR'
    IMPORTING
      ev_brf_expr_id = lv_brf_expr_id ).
ls_context-id = lv_brf_expr_id.
CREATE DATA ls_context-value TYPE fb_segment.
ASSIGN ls_context-value->* TO <value>.
<value> = <pctrseg>.
APPEND ls_context TO et_rule_context_value.
endmethod.

Using Decision Service for existing rules based on Java Fact

Hello
According The BPEL Process Manager developers guid (10.1.3.1) page 18-28 if we want to call existing ruleset from BPEL that it's based on java facts . We should write RL function and convert xml data into java and assert the facts and after retrieving the result we should set the data from java types into xml types. From BPEL we should call this function
But I have question : We know that rules based on java facts has better performance than xml facts , Instead of Using Decicion Service , we have writen java function and run ruleset and then we have exposed this as a webservice and invoke it from BPEL.
What is the performance difference if we use this way instead of Decision Services?

Thank you ralf
So I want to write an RL Function and call my ruleset (based on my Java facts) from this RL Function and then Call this RL Function from BPEL decicion services.
I have problem : I want to generate XSD that match with my JavaFact A . How can I easily create XSD from my java fact class.? I saw http://technology.amis.nl/blog/?p=3221 that shows how we can create xsd from Java classes . I could generate XSD from Java class A by the recommended method.
I have Class A that contains member B as an array of objects (C) , My problem is that When I import generated xsd into rule Author it's generated JAXB class does not generate member B as an array of class(C)
Is there any way that I can modify class A into JAXB compatible class and generate xsd file from it's JAXB class .
I don't know JAXB specification and I do not know how JAXB works.I want easily generate JAXB class form my java class A and then retrieve corresponding xsd from it .
Can I do such thing?

Rule-based distribution for opportunities

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for