Running  javafx on a 64 bit machine under Windows 7

I want to run javafx on a 64 bit machine under Windows 7. I receive the following log when running simple "Hello World" program:
init:
deps-jar:
compile:
jar:
standard-run:
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library: Can't load AMD 64-bit .dll on a IA 32-bit platform
BUILD FAILED (total time: 0 seconds)
Looking at sys requirements for javafx, I see that only 32 bit windows is supported. I did, though, succeed in doing a (64 Bit) build within netbeans after added a JAVA_HOME environment variable to point to my JDK directory (from Win 64 bit download).
Please can anyone explain what I need to do so that (preferably) a javafx application runs 64 bit or if no choice how I can direct a 32 bit run without effecting most of the development tools that do support 64 bit?
By the way, when running from command line:
+"D:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.8\javafx2\javafx-sdk\bin\javafx.exe" -version+
I receive same error as above:
Error occurred during initialization of VM
Unable to load native library: Can't load AMD 64-bit .dll on a IA 32-bit platform
David Ziants

I also tried adding to my system environment path variable: %JAVA_HOME%\bin;%JAVA_HOME%\jre\bin;and this did not help.
My webstart properties are:
$label=Web Start
execution.target=jnlp
javafx.profile=desktopbut I think the matter is more basic because I also receive the same error from the command line:
"D:\Program Files\NetBeans 6.8\javafx2\javafx-sdk\bin\javafx.exe" -versionas I already mentioned.

Similar Messages

  • Install Captivate 4 on Windows 7 64-bit machine with Windows XP mode?

    Hi,
    I have been searching the web to find out the best way/place in which to load Captivate 4 on my Windows 7 64-bit machine. Seems some people have issues with recording, others don't. I have Windows XP mode on my machine.
    My question is... what's the best way to load Captivate 4 on Windows 7 - should I install to Windows 7 and see how it goes. Or should I install under Windows XP mode?
    Thank you!
    Michele

    Yea it works in XP mode
    Daniel Wooden
    Systems
    U.S. District Court Middle District of Tennessee
    615-736-7485
    From:   RodWard <[email protected]>
    To:     DEW45 <[email protected]>
    Date:   09/24/2011 12:01 AM
    Subject:        Install Captivate 4 on Windows 7 64-bit
    machine with Windows XP mode?
    Re: Install Captivate 4 on Windows 7 64-bit machine with Windows XP mode?
    created by RodWard in Adobe Captivate - View the full discussion
    Try running Cp4 in WinXp compatibility mode on Win7.  Also make sure
    you're set to Run as Administrator.
    I run Cp4 on Win7 without issues.  But other users report similar problems
    to yourself.  In the end, it may or may not work for you because Adobe has
    never claimed Cp4 was compatible with Vista or Win7 64bit.
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not
    directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either
    reply to this email or visit the message page: [
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3935593#3935593]
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at [
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/3935593#3935593]. In the Actions box on
    the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Adobe Captivate by email or at Adobe Forums
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications
    please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • Trying to install a setup on a 64 bit machine with Windows server 2012 R2 which writes to registry FAILES

    My msi is a 32 bit setup.
    When I install it on a 32 bit machine with Windows XP it works fine .
    I tried to install it on a 64 bit machine with windows server 2008 and it succeeds
    While running my setup on a 64 bit machine with Windows server 2012 R2 it failes and I get the folloawing message:
    "Registry object reference not set to an instance of an object"
    Then the setup exits and leaves the app partially installed
    I tried searching for known problems over the net, but found nothing
    I will be happy to get some advice
    Thanks
    Liora

    Sounds like you are trying to update a registry object that is not there.
    Is this your own msi, or is it from a third party application?  If third party, check with them to see if they support it on 2012 or if they have a known workaround.
    If it is your own msi, sounds like it is time to debug it.
    .:|:.:|:. tim

  • Will an HD 5870 run on a Mac Pro 1,1 under Windows?

    Hey Guys,
    Done a search for this but can't find any information. I'm looking into getting a little more life out of my Mac Pro (Quad 2.66, 13Gb RAM, HD 3870) by being able to use it for PC gaming, and was wondering whether any of the latest video cards (like the HD 5870) will still run on the machine under a Windows partition (probably Vista 64-bit, but maybe Windows 7 if I upgrade to that).
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Cheers

    The question is what do you do instead of use the 3870, as you don't have 3 aux connectors to work with (and one 16x slot, while you probably can get along fine with 4x or 8x for the 3870).
    I would not even give Vista the time of day. But, Windows 7 Pro 64-bit is a 'must' to use more than 2GB RAM; to use both processors. Else, it really doesn't work as well, and Vista isn't worth the effort.
    So once you solve the EFI64 boot issue that Windows and Apple now use for 64-bit, you'll be fine.
    Then again, maybe its time to cut loses, some people would be happy to be able to run Tiger, and are willing to pay $1k for a system like yours.

  • Running DS-5 armcc compiled code (PIC) under Windows EC 2013

    Hi All,
    i just wanted to know if it is generally (officially) supported to run code that is compiled via the armcc (5.03) from DS-5 under Windows Embedded Compact 2013. Or if this is discouraged (reasons?).
    The problem i have:
    The bootloader contains some code that must be run during Windows EC Startup. So this code is loaded from the Flash, copied to RAM (reserved and commited via VirtualAlloc and marked as executable) and then the functions are called via FunctionPointers.
    The code is compiled and linked as position independent and the stack base register is set accordingly before any function is called via pointer and reset when it returns.
    This works in about 9 out of 10 tests without problems. But sometimes i get all sort of exceptions (Data Abort, Prefetch Abort, Unknown Instruction, ...). Most (if not all) of the time they occur when the position independent code runs on one of the two
    cores.
    The code runs on an i.MX6DQ (dual).
    If i only enable one core, i can't reproduce the problem (i assume that multicore-handling and multithreading in WinEC 2013 Update 10 is really well tested and works without problems, so this can't be the real reason).
    I've thoroughly checked and debugged the code, i'm really sure there is no illegal access or other problem with the code itself.
    Could it be a problem to call code compiled via DS-5 armcc? I've compared assembler code that Visual Studio/Platform Builder generates with code that DS-5 generates (but i'm no assembler expert). I can't see any obvious special code that is added by Visual
    Studio/Platform Builder (i.e. that functions need) that is not there in the DS-5 code.
    Best Regards
    Sebastian

    So I think you could be able to image some code for ROM from another compiler and without knowledge of Windows CE. However, if the code will be called from Windows CE, this becomes more difficult requiring very careful isolation from the
    MMU state, processor state, kernel/user mode, etc. Code that works great when called from the bootloader might not work at all from Windows CE itself. The main problem with mixing code from different compilers is the object file format and conventions for
    entry and public names. Very unlikely that you'd be able to "link" code from any other compiler with PB-compiled code.
    You might think about the x86 image which can easily call BIOS from the bootloader but which can't even begin to call BIOS from CE itself. The problem isn't the compiler (which is different), but the operating environment differences and assumptions.
    Paul T.

  • 64-bit plugin under Windows 7

    I am having trouble loading a 64-bit SDK  plugin on Windows 7.   I tried the simple gradient import plugin which seems to build fine under x64 but, Photoshop does not load the file.   Anyone been able to get this working and if so was there any changes you need to make?
    Thanks in advance.

    We have no problems with our x64 plugin on Win7. You may want to either examine PIPL or use Window Event Viewer or/and Microsoft Depend tool to make sure all the external dependencies are properly satisfied (manifest issues are a pretty common problem) as both of these result in a silent failure. You may also want to take a look at the debug output trace to see whether PS even tries to load you plugin

  • Photoshop elements - 13 - Installation 32 Bit Version under Windows 81.1 pro 64 Bit

    Hallo!
    Sorry "this" is not my language...bad i try it.
    For now, i have the new versions of photoshop elements v13 (and premiere elements 13). I the past i have installed the 32 bit version and the 64 bit version at the same time, at the same machine. but version 13 32 bit dont can install on a 64 bit os. But i need also the 32 bit version - a lot of plugins dont work with the 64 bitversion.
    Is there any possibilty to solve my problem?
                    cu

    As far as the "no original version" goes, you should also be able to select an option to enter the name and serial number of the older (aka original) version instead of having it already installed.

  • Running FF as regular (non-admin ) user under Windows. FF 34 window moves down unexpectidly when adding a tab or resizing the window. Was OK w/ FF 17

    I resize FF window, or add/remove a tab. The entire window moves down.

    Opening some pages, such as Oracle eGroupware calendar causes the window to move down several steps as well.
    W2008 R2 + Remote Desktop Service.

  • Problem trying to run 32 bit VBA program on a 64 bit machine

    I am a new programmer using VBA in Excel. I have used code that refers to a kernel32 in the VBA code. This code fails on a 64 bit machine. Runs perfectly fine on 32 bit machine. Is there code I can add that will allow the program to run on both systems?
    The code is being used to determine the UTC time of a cell from a report.
    Thank you in advance. Code below:
    Option Explicit
    Public Declare Function SystemTimeToFileTime Lib _
        "kernel32" (lpSystemTime As SYSTEMTIME, _
        lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Public Declare Function LocalFileTimeToFileTime Lib _
        "kernel32" (lpLocalFileTime As FILETIME, _
        lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Public Declare Function FileTimeToSystemTime Lib _
        "kernel32" (lpFileTime As FILETIME, lpSystemTime _
        As SYSTEMTIME) As Long
    Public Type FILETIME
        dwLowDateTime As Long
        dwHighDateTime As Long
    End Type
    Public Type SYSTEMTIME
        wYear As Integer
        wMonth As Integer
        wDayOfWeek As Integer
        wDay As Integer
        wHour As Integer
        wMinute As Integer
        wSecond As Integer
        wMilliseconds As Integer
    End Type

    I don't have Office-64 to test but try this
    #If VBA7 Then
    Declare PtrSafe Function SystemTimeToFileTime Lib "kernel32" Alias "SystemTimeToFileTime" (lpSystemTime As SYSTEMTIME, lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Declare PtrSafe Function LocalFileTimeToFileTime Lib "kernel32" Alias "LocalFileTimeToFileTime" (lpLocalFileTime As FILETIME, lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Declare PtrSafe Function FileTimeToSystemTime Lib "kernel32" Alias "FileTimeToSystemTime" (lpFileTime As FILETIME, lpSystemTime As SYSTEMTIME) As Long
    #Else
    Public Declare Function SystemTimeToFileTime Lib _
    "kernel32" (lpSystemTime As SYSTEMTIME, _
    lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Public Declare Function LocalFileTimeToFileTime Lib _
    "kernel32" (lpLocalFileTime As FILETIME, _
    lpFileTime As FILETIME) As Long
    Public Declare Function FileTimeToSystemTime Lib _
    "kernel32" (lpFileTime As FILETIME, lpSystemTime _
    As SYSTEMTIME) As Long
    #End If
    For a good intro
    Declaring API Functions In 64 Bit Office

  • Crystal report 2008 on a 64 bits machine

    My company would like to develop a new .Net application which produce and view 
    some rountine crystal report on a 64-bits machine.
    At the same time, this machine will also install a stand alone full product crystal report
    2008 which allow to develope some adhoc report.
    I would like to ask whether the full product crystal report 2008 can install and
    run perfectly on a 64 bits machine. Do I need to have any special configuration during
    or after installation?
    On the other hand, I observe that the crystal report 2008 with service pack 0 can
    support 64 bits. Is it true that the evaluation copy of crystal report 2008
    on official site is that version and I can evaluate it on a 64 bits machine ?
    Ricky

    Hi Ricky,
    The full product Crystal Report 2008 can be installed and can run perfectly on a 64 bits machine.
    Hardware Support
    u2022 Crystal Reports® is supported running on 32-bit versions of Windows running on x86 and x64 CPUs made by AMD and Intel.
    u2022 Crystal Reports® is supported running on 64-bit versions of Windows running on x64 CPUs made by AMD and Intel.
    You can download the Crystal Report 2008 with Service Pack 0, evaluation copy from official site and can evaluate on a 64 bits machine.
    http://resources.businessobjects.com/support/additional_downloads/service_packs/crystal_reports_en.asp#CR2008
    Hope this resolves your issue.
    Regards,
    Abhijeet T

  • Image.getScaledInstance() does not always work under Windows Vista

    Hi:
    I've run into some intermittent image scaling problems under Windows Vista (minus Aero effects) that I never experienced with the same program, same image(s), running same Java version under XP. The images I'm using are all JPEGs, and the problem appears to affect approx 1 out of 3 grayscale images (no color ones so far) w/o respect to size (ie: small ones can be problems while larger ones will work). Java -version shows 1.6.0_02-b06. I was wondering if anyone else out there has seen this, or can point out what I may be doing wrong. Sample code to duplicate follows.
    Tx,
    Jallewel
    // ===================================================================
    // Image Scaling Problem, Description & Demo Program (minus the image):
    //   Environment:  SDK/JRE: Java 1.6.0_02-b06, running under
    //        Windows Vista Home Premium (32-Bit) on Dell Inspiron w/3GB RAM
    //   ************* Symptoms ******************
    //   Problem occurs when invoking image.getScaledInstance().
    //   Problem shows up under Windows Vista, configured w/Windows Classic look
    //       & feel - that is, with Aero effects turned OFF.
    //   Problem does NOT show up under Windows XP on Dell Dimension 4500.
    //   Test across computers used same SDK/JRE, Java program, and Image.
    //   Problem ONLY appears in grayscale JPEG images, and only 1 out of 3 of those.
    //   (I can provide a problem image)
    // Results Compiling & Running This Program:
    //   C:\Users\~\VistaProblem>javac VistaProblem.java
    //   C:\Users\~\VistaProblem>java VistaProblem
    //      Uncaught error fetching image:
    //      java.lang.ClassCastException: [I cannot be cast to [B
    //        at java.awt.image.ColorModel.getAlpha(Unknown Source)
    //        at java.awt.image.ColorModel.getRGB(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.ImageRepresentation.convertToRGB(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.ImageRepresentation.setPixels(Unknown Source)
    //        at java.awt.image.AreaAveragingScaleFilter.accumPixels(Unknown Source)
    //        at java.awt.image.AreaAveragingScaleFilter.setPixels(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.ImageDecoder.setPixels(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.JPEGImageDecoder.sendPixels(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.JPEGImageDecoder.readImage(Native Method)
    //        at sun.awt.image.JPEGImageDecoder.produceImage(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.InputStreamImageSource.doFetch(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher.fetchloop(Unknown Source)
    //        at sun.awt.image.ImageFetcher.run(Unknown Source)
    import java.*;
    import java.awt.*;
    import java.io.*;
    import javax.imageio.*;
    // class VistaProblem
    public class VistaProblem extends Frame {
       private static ScrollPane sp = new ScrollPane(ScrollPane.SCROLLBARS_AS_NEEDED);
       public static ImageComponent ic;
       // Constructor
       public VistaProblem() {
          super("VistaProblem");
          add(sp, BorderLayout.CENTER);
          this.setSize(700, 520);
          setVisible(true);
         String fPathName = "./ProblemImage.jpg";
          ic = new ImageComponent(getToolkit().getImage(fPathName));
          sp.add(ic);
          sp.validate();
          ic.Scale(220, 200);
       // class ImageComponent
       class ImageComponent extends Component {
          private Image image;
          // Constructor
          ImageComponent(Image img) {
             this.image = img;
          // paint
          public void paint(Graphics g) {
             g.setColor(getBackground());
             g.drawImage(image, 10, 10, this);
             g.dispose();
          // Scale
          public void Scale (int width, int height) {
             // ***** PROBLEM LINE HERE; COMMENT OUT AND PROGRAM WORKS *****
             this.image = this.image.getScaledInstance(width, height, Image.SCALE_SMOOTH);
             repaint();
       // Main Entry Point
       public static void main(String args[]) {
          Frame f = new VistaProblem();
    } // end VistaProblem

    That does indeed appear to be a bug. I looks like it's having problems with the alpha value in the color model, so a possible workaround would be to change the color model the image uses before scaling. This may entail creating a new BufferedImage and drawing the old image into it.

  • Windows 8.1 32 bit installation over Windows 8.1 64 bit

    Hello,
    I have one 64 bit machine with Windows 8.1 64 bit installed.
    To do some testing, I need to install Windows 8.1 32 bit OS on this machine. Steps which I am following:
    1) Boot the system from 32 bit OS DVD from DVD drive.
    2) Select Install button in place of Repair option.
    3) Select "C:" as drive where to install new OS.
    4) It gives me warning that it will delete all files from selected drive during installation.
    5) After installation, when I go to Computer=>Properties then in SystemType it is still showing me Windows 8.1 64 bit OS.
    6) It is creating one extra folder "Windows.old" on C: but all my previous files/folders are still present on C: after new installation also.
    Can you please help me to install Windows 8.1 32 bit on a 64 bit machine (which has 64 bit Windows 8.1 already installed)?

    WHICH IS THE BEST WINDOWS8.1 64 BITWITH64BIT INSTALLED OR 8.1 64 BIT WITH THE 32 BIT OS DVD AND WHAT IS THE NEW OS?
    Hi,
    Windows 8.1 64 bit and 32 bit has itself advantage. While, if RAM bigger than 4G, it would be better to use 64 bit OS.
    According to OP's description, it's probably install 64 bit system by mistake.
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Firefox 6 running under Windows 7 64-bit does not render fonts correctly.

    The default sans-serif font for Firefox is Arial. Running Firefox 6 under Windows 7 32-bit, the font renders properly, but under 64-bit Win7, the font is too heavy, and bold or strong makes no difference. I run Win7 64-bit on a laptop computer and use Firefox 5 on it, and the fonts render properly. Possibly a Firefox 6/64-bit problem?

    Hi strangerland, don't give up hope -- I'm using Firefox 36.0.4 on Windows 7 right now.
    That said, I understand troubleshooting fatigue and when you find time to think about Firefox again, and have the opportunity to shut down and restart Windows, you might try testing in Windows Safe Mode with Networking, a mode that blocks some external programs that can interfere with Firefox.
    * [http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/advanced-startup-options-including-safe-mode#1TC=windows-7 Advanced startup options (including safe mode) - Windows Help]
    * [http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/start-computer-safe-mode#start-computer-safe-mode=windows-7 Start your computer in safe mode - Windows Help]

  • When I went to bed I had 3,000  song and multiple playlists.  This morning I have ~30 songs and no playlists.  What could have happened to my songs playlists?  I run iTunes on a Windows 7 64-bit machine.  HELP! (oh, and the Songs are not in recycle bin)

    When I went to bed I had 3,000  song and multiple playlists.  This morning I have ~30 songs and no playlists.  What could have happened to my songs playlists?  I run iTunes on a Windows 7 64-bit machine.  HELP! (oh, and the Songs are not in recycle bin)
    My wife's ipod nano was plugged into the machine overnight.
    When she went running with it, there were no songs on it.  She checked the computer and was horrified to see that the playlists had disappeared and most of the songs had disappeared.
    QUESTIONS:
    1. What could it be?
    2. How can I fix it?

    Hi, there alot of us suffering from this phernomonon but there is a forum topic about is already.
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/16767377#16767377
    Come check it out.
    Hope this works out for all of us.

  • Problem running in 64 bit machine

    Hi all
    I installed the Jdeveloper Version 11.1.1.4.0 to windows 7 64 bit machine and ran an application that was developed earlier in a 32 bit machine.
    The weblogic server is going to "Running mode" and getting stuck thereafter.
    Can anyone please tell me what could be the reason.

    Hi,
    The weblogic server is going to "Running mode" and getting stuck thereafter.I have not tried in 64 bit, but i can say the the weblogic will remain there untill you manually stop it.. it normal, you can try to see if the console is running or not by typing http://<host>:<port>/console/
    default http://127.0.0.1:7101/console
    default username/password = weblogic/weblogic1
    If console opens then every thing is running on its way.
    Regards,
    Santosh.

Maybe you are looking for