SAP NOTE APPLIED OR NOT?

HI all,
how to know the particular sap note is applied or not in the system >
regards ,
Srinivas .

Hi there,
You use transaction SNOTE and click on Ctrl+F9. This will check if the note is already installed or not.
If not, and you want to install it, click on download note, and then apply it in DEV and afterwards transport it to production.
Diogo.

Similar Messages

ZCM DLU Policy Not Applying To Win7 Computer

I am running ZCM v10.3 and am preparing to migrate over to Active Directory. When I first setup ZCM, I created a DLU policy for my Windows 7 computers and its been working fine. However, its time to join my Windows 7 computers (running ZCM v10.3) to the AD Domain and I need to disable the DLU for the machines prior to joining the domain.
To do this I tried to exclude my test workstations from the DLU by adding the workstations to the exclusion list for the DLU Policy. My DLU policy is assigned to my Users so I used the "Excluded Workstation List" to attempt to prevent the DLU from applying to the workstation. This didn't work. I also tried the reverse by applying the DLU to the test workstation and adding users to the Exclusion list, but that didn't work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
I reassigned the DLU to all my Users and tried to use the registry to check for the existence and value of hklm\software\novell\zcm\zenlgn\domainlogin=1, but that didnt work either. I updated the version, ran "zac cc" and ran "zac ref bypasscache" but it didnt work.
Actually, the registry keys (DomainLogin and eDIRLogin) didn't exist so i had to manually add it using an AD GPO. I added DomainLogin and eDIRLogin and assign hexadecimal value of 1 to each DWORD via GPO (FYI). At this point I'm not even sure if the values of these keys are supposed to be set automatically upon login or if the admins manually control the values. Its not clear to me from the documentation on the Novell site. (http://www.novell.com/documentation/...stem_admin.pdf, pg 274)
(DLU Policy Filters not working)
I turned on debug by issuing the command: "zac log level debug", and would've attached the log here, but I don't know how. If anyone needs to see the log, please send me a link on how to attach a log and I'll do so.
I've tried so many different settings and combinations but i'm still unable to get consistent results. At some point I was able to get the DLU Policy to show up in the ZCM Agent properties with the status of "Not Applied" or "Not Effective" or something to that effect. That was the first time I was able to log in without the DLU applying. However it wasn't consistent among other machines so i kept testing. As it stands now, I have removed any filters and exclusions and now my test machine is not receiving any DLU policy and it should because I assigned the DLU Policy to my entire user base. I am totally lost.
Any help is appreciated.

wanman,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://forums.novell.com/

"Local Policies User Rights Assignment" not applying

I bought Dell Vostro series computer with a Windows 7 Professional 64-bit OEM.
The OS cannot apply the changed User Rights Assignment in Local Policies.
Here is the step to re-produce the problem:
1. Launch "cmd"
2. Type "date 2014-06-20" in the command prompt. (i.e. try to change the date)
3. A error shown "A required privilege is not held by the client."
4. I go to "Control Panel > Administrative Tools > Local Security Policy".
5. I open "Local Policies > User Rights Assignment", and add "Everyone" to "Change the system time" and "Change the time zone"
6. Restart the computer
7. Launch "cmd" and type "date 2014-06-20", the same error message shown. That is, the policy is not applied.
Note: If I launch the cmd as administrator, no error will show.
I am not familiar with Local Security Policy and related and I tried to search online but not thing found (maybe I didn't know how to apply).
I would like to know how to resolve this problem from you. If you need more information like the log in Event Log, please tell me which one you need.
Thanks so much!

Hi,
I tested this issue, after adding everyone to the group you mentioned above, I can successfully change the system time as a standard user. and the format is date 06-20-2014
I suggest you logon as admin, and manually check the policy, see whether it has been updated.
Yolanda Zhu
TechNet Community Support

Report to find the SAP NOTES applied

Is there a way to generate a report in solution manager which gives us a list of SAP NOTES applied in our R/3 or BW servers.
Thanks,
Kiran

Hi
What Rajeev was tryin to say is... you implement E2E root cause analysis in solution manager system.
sub component under root cause analysis is "Change analysis" this will give details about notes implemented in satellite system.
There is also feature called change reporting, even this can be used for getting details about notes applied.
for more details chk
service.sap.com/diagnostics.
Regards,
Shyam.

SAP notes applied to a TX

Hi Experts
I am investigating a probelm related to some TX's e.g MB1B, MIGO.
How do I know that what SAP notes have been applied to a SAP tranasction.
Pls advise.
e.g. I may have to apply a SAP note to a TX but before that I want to make sure that what notes have been applied so far
Regards
Gaurav

The program related to MB1B...., MIGO is SAPMM07M, please check the program and program versions. If there are descriptions or comments maintained while applying the note then you can easily find it. Or please check the transaction SNOTE which will list you all the oss notes applied,
Also please check SPAM transaction from which you can find the package name of the OSS note in which it is included.
In every Oss note it will be mentioned in which support pack this OSS note belongs to, please check if that support pack exists in your system then it is implied that this Oss note is present in your system.
Hope this helps you.

Help needed applying OSS note 981295 in SAP ECC 5.0 with SAP Kernel 640_REL

Hi Experts,
Our functional team is trying to implement a kind of workflow through a notification via SAP Inbox (transaction code SBWP) after the release of a Purchase Order (Transaction code ME29), this is every time when a purchase order is released through transaction code ME29, a notification will be sent to the SAP Inbox (transaction code SBWP). So according to this they told me to implement OSS note 981295, but using transaction SNOTE I get the message that this note can't be implemented in my system this because my SAP Kernel version is the release 6.40 and the needed SAP Kernel for this note is from version 7.00 to version 7.10. So what do you recommend please in this case in order to implement the required functionality on our SAP ECC 5.0 System?
Best Regards,
Erik Espinosa

Note clearly states
This note is only relevant if the following Support Package is installed in the system:
NW04s: Support Package SAPKB70008
Meaning is not relevat to your case. You need to keep looking... if you open an OSS message people from SAP might put you in the right direction.
Regards
Juan

SAP j2ee engine is not running error while applying patches.

Hi all,
Iam in the process of aplpying patches using JSPM tool , for some of them iam getting the error messages , when i checked the log file for this tool it says:
SAP J2ee engine is not running , unable to login to <HOST name> with id <Login id>.
Iam very new to this activity ,can anybody help me in this regard , i wil be very thankful.
Thanks and Regards.
Niyati.

Hi,
What exactly do you see when you say that the status in the MMC is OK? I don't think it can be green if you say that you get a message saying "Service Unavailable" when you try to login. If you get that message, it means that the service hasn't either been started or could not be started in case of an error. In this case the server status in the MMC should be yellow (or gray in case none of the services could be started)...
Could you perhaps check it again? Another point to check would be if the connection to the database is OK. If you are using MySQL MaxDB, you could use the Database Manager tool to check this. Sometimes the log files fill up the database and the server cannot start because the database is full. In such cases you will need to clear the logs and then restart the entire cluster.
Sameer

Selection criteria are not applied to summary fields on group footers.

I wonder if anyone can help me with this problem. I am using Crystal reports version 11.2, and my data source is a Sql Server view.
The records on the view have a date field, and I have selected all records within a given date range in "Selection Formulas".
The records are then grouped, and the Crystal summary facility used to summarise number fields on the group footers.
So for example, if my view contains four records, one with field "amount" = 2, one with field "amount" = 8, one with field "amount" = 6, one with field "amount" = 3, but only the first two records are within the valid date range, you would expect to see the first two records listed out at detail level, then field "amount" summarised at group level, with a summarised value of 10.
ie ....                record1                      2
                       record2                      8
                       group level total         10
This works fine when I run the report using Crystal's "print preview" facility. However, when the report is run from within an application written in C#.NET, the selection criteria are not applied to the summary field, so you get ..
                       record1                      2
                       record2                      8
                       group level total          19
I tried putting the date selection criteria at both record and group level, but that did not work.
I googled the problem and found an article explaining that Crystal first performs the record-level selection, then it creates the groups and totals up any summary fields, and only then does it apply the group-level selection criteria, which can lead to problems like the one I have described above. However, since I have put my date selection criteria at both record and group level, I do not understand why I still get the problem.
In one report I got round this problem by creating a formula that returned zero if the record date was outside of the valid date range, and returned the number field to be summarised if the date was valid, then summarising that formula, instead of summarising the number field directly.
In other reports I created one formula to set a shared variable as zero, then another formula to accumulate it at detail record level, then another formula to display the variable at the group footer. In other words, I did not bother with the Crystal summary facility at all, but created my own summary facility.
While googling the problem to see what other people did in this situation, I noticed that most fixes used variations of the "shared variables and formulae" fix to get round the problem.
The problem is that I have lots of complex reports and it will take ages to replace the summarised fields with shared variables and formulae. The reports were initially tested with "Print Preview" so we did not notice this problem until the C#.Net application was ready to use them. And I can't believe that you are simply meant to ignore the summary facility and re-invent the wheel by doing it all manually.
Please tell me that there is something simple that I have been doing wrong!!! If I have not given enough information for you to answer, please let me know.
Thanks,
Anne-Marie

Hi, Anne-Marie;
You may be running into a common issue that is docuemented here:
[SelectionFormula|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes_boj/sdn_oss_boj_erq/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/scn_bosap/notes%7B6163636573733d36393736354636443646363436353344333933393338323636393736354637333631373036453646373436353733354636453735364436323635373233443330333033303331333233303334333833393335%7D.do]
Regards,
Jonathan
Edited by: Jonathan Parminter on Mar 16, 2009 8:03 AM

In SOLMAN after applying security notes warings are coming

Hi All,
Please help here
We have applied some security notes in SOMAN Dev & made the TR for the same
after importing the TR in Live we are getting warining.
log detail is as below
Post-import method SCWN_AFTER_IMP_METHOD started for NOTE L, date and time: 2010111705264
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001379987
No release data for Note 0001379987 in the data file in the request
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001379987
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001380710
No release data for Note 0001380710 in the data file in the request
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001380710
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001381719
No release data for Note 0001381719 in the data file in the request
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001381719
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001402132
No release data for Note 0001402132 in the data file in the request
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001402132
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001412774
No release data for Note 0001412774 in the data file in the request
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001412774
Beginn: After import method for SAP Note 0001430970
End: After import method for SAP Note 0001430970
Execution of programs after import (XPRA)
End date and time : 20101117052647
Ended with return code: ===> 4 <===
we checked and could see these SAP Notes coming in warning message has been implemented in our Dev & Live suuccessfully
still waring is coming
please help here to avoid this warnings
Regards,
Vyash

Hi,
Regarding the message "No release data for Note XXXXXXXXX in the data file in the request"
You can normally ignore this warning.
The warning's meaning:
When a Note (R3TR NOTE) is transported, the release data for the
software components affected by the Note is normally transported too. If
a transport request contains several Notes, however, the release data
is only transported with one of the Notes, and not with all of them.
When a transport request containing several Notes is imported, the
system issues a warning for all Notes that do not have release data
transported with them.
If the system issues this warning for all Notes during a transport
request import, however, this might mean that the data in the target
system is incomplete. If this is the case, the system will issue an
error message when the imported Notes are displayed with transaction
SNOTE.
You can solve this display problem by downloading one of the Notes again
from SAP Service Marketplace. The functionality of your system is in no
way impaired.
Hope the above information could be helpful to your situation.
Kind regards,
Fabricius

CK40N - Still open even after applying the note

Hello Everyone!
Greetings!
Experiencing issues in the costing run. SAP ECC 5.0
After the marking job completion observed that there are some u2018Still Openu2019 items. After some research found the SAP notes u2013 0000542790, 0001321242 & 0001402978.
SAP note 0000542790 is not applicable to us as the client is on SAP ECC 5.0. For the short term fix, as per the note 542790 have executed the command u2018=cksuu2019. It worked.
To apply the notes 0001321242, 0001402978 was testing in the test systems and I still see the u2018STILL OPENu2019 items even after implementing the SAP notes 0001321242 and 0001402978. Both the notes have been sucessfully implemented and also verified the corrections.
Any suggestions/advice, please. Thanks in advance !
Satish

Hi Satish,
There can be valid reasons for the 'still open' Materials.
The following are reasons for 'still open'
1. the materials were included in another costing run so there was an
overlap in released cost estimates
2. there was already a released cost estimate for those materials so
the system did not allow for another one - this could have been costed
manually and released manually (ck11) rather than in ck40n
3. there was a stop in the job that ran to release them (you mentioned
periods were closed). After the restart, some of the statistics could
have been incorrectly updated.
Furthermore, please see the note:
542790 Inconsistency correction: Costing run statistics
If need need to find the 'still open' Materials.
If you run tCode 'SE16' and view the table table KALM which contains
the entries for all materials costed within the costing run.
Field 'KALM-FEH_STATUS is the cost estimate's status after step costing.
1) Find cost estimates created originally within cstg run
So, you have to select all entries of KALM for the specific costing
run which are having KALM-FEH_STATUS = 'KA'.
This is the number of cost estimates which should have been marked in
the later marking step.
2) Find cost estimates released successfully
The set of released cost estimates is given by selection of table
KEKO: specify KALAID and KALADAT and FEH_STA = 'FR'.
3) Find missing cost estimates
Compare the results of 1) and 2):
Which material/plant have an KALM entry, but not a released cost
cost estimate ?
> this will be the set of cost estimates you are looking for...
Regards,Declan

SAP XI and Lotus Notes

Hello,
Is there a best approach followed now to integrate XI and Lotus notes. We have a requirement to create a lotus notes document from SAP R3 using XI.
Any suggestions and successful implementations please...
Thank you
Thilothama

Hello Thilothama,
if you apply SAP XI to connect to Lotus you may leverage the following adapters:
- HTTP
- SOAP
- XINotes (partner adapter)
the choice depends on how much effort you want to spend on the Lotus side.
In case of HTTP you simply develop an agent that processes the request XML. This can be done fairly easy - however this is a proprietary solution since you kind of hard-code the formats.
In case of SOAP you need a little more work. If you use Lotus Domino R6 you also manually have to take case of SOAP request parsing (e.g. using the Microsoft SOAP toolkit or some java-based parser). If you use R7 this is easier since SOAP processing is implemented as part of Domino. Then, your interface is described using a WSDL and this can optionally also be published via a UDDI registry.
In case of XINotes you don't need any work on Lotus since the XINotes adapter is based on NCSO - this means the adapter directly understands notes forms and notes views.
Regarding the payload XML you process via HTTP or SOAP you may leverage DXL. DXL is easy to process on Domino since you can use the DXL Importer classes to directly create/update/modify notes documents within 2 codelines. On the other hand: if you use DXL the sender system should already prepare the DXL - so it needs lots of information regarding your notes DB (replica ID etc).
If you need more tangible experiences you may also contact me directly.
Regards
Michael

Default Domain Policy Not Applying Settings to Servers or Clients

I have 2008 R2 DC's with a functioning level of 2003. Our domain servers are a mix of 2003, 2008, 2008 R2, and 2012 and our clients are a mix of Windows 7 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro.
I recently made a change to the Default Domain Policy located at Computer Configuration -> Policies -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options
For the Security Policy setting called: Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
The change was to enable DES because of a specific need that I have with an application that I work with but enabling DES and leaving the other options such AES unselected caused other applications to not work right. I decided to revert the changes
back to "Not Defined" but those changes did not reflect on the servers even after running the gpupdate /force command.
In order to keep the application working that broke, we enabled all of the encryption levels such as DES, AES, etc. on the server that's running the application via it's Local Security Policy as a temporary fix.
Now, I want to make sure all servers receive the settings from the Default Domain Policy and have their Local Security Policies reflect the "Not Defined" setting but it's not applying. It seems like they worked when I first applied them but
when I try to remove them it does not work.
If I change the setting directly on the Local Security Policy on the server or clients it shows "No minimum" instead of "Not Defined" which I've heard can be fixed by identifying the registry entry for that setting and deleting it...so
help with the location and how to identify that key would also be helpful.
My goal is not to manually have to change servers and clients to revert back to their default settings...I want the Domain policy to apply and override the servers and client's Local Security Policy.
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated and thank you in advance.

I have 2008 R2 DC's with a functioning level of 2003. Our domain servers are a mix of 2003, 2008, 2008 R2, and 2012 and our clients are a mix of Windows 7 Pro and Windows 8.1 Pro.
I recently made a change to the Default Domain Policy located at Computer Configuration -> Policies -> Windows Settings -> Security Settings -> Local Policies -> Security Options
For the Security Policy setting called: Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
refer:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj852180(v=ws.10).aspx
We needed to implement a similar scenario a few years ago (when we introduced Windows7 into our estate).
We had an SAP/NetWeaver implementation which always worked on WinXP, but failed on Win7.
We had to enable the DES ciphers, since those were disabled by default in Win7. We discovered that we also needed to enable all the other ciphers (those which are enabled by default[not configured]).
i.e., when we changed the setting from "Not Configured", enabled DES, and left the RC4/AES stuff untouched by us, the RC4/AES stuff attracted a status of disabled.
So, we had to set the DES ciphers to Enabled, and, also set the RC4/AES ciphers to Enabled - this gave us the "resultant" enablement of the default stuff and the needed change/addition of DES.
When you set a GP setting "back to Not Configured", depending upon the setting *AND* the individual Windows feature itself - one of two things will happen:
a) the feature will "revert" to default behaviour
b) the feature will retain the current configured behaviour but becomes un-managed
In classic Group Policy terms, condition (b) above is often referred to as "tattooing", i.e., the last GP setting remains in effect even though GPMC/RSOP/etc does not reveal that to be the case.
(This is also a really good example of not doing this sort of stuff in the DDP. It could have borked your whole domain :)
What I'd suggest, is that you re-enable your ciphers for KRB settings again - this time, enable all the ciphers that would normally be "default", let that replicate around, and allow time for domain members to action it.
Then, set the setting back to Not Configured. This way, the "last" settings issued by GP will be those you want to remain as the "legacy".
Note: the GP settings reference s/sheet, has this to say:
Network security: Configure encryption types allowed for Kerberos
This policy setting allows you to set the encryption types that Kerberos is allowed to use.
If not selected, the encryption type will not be allowed. This setting may affect compatibility with client computers or services and applications. Multiple selections are permitted.
This policy is supported on at least Windows 7 or Windows Server 2008 R2.
Don
(Please take a moment to "Vote as Helpful" and/or "Mark as Answer", where applicable.
This helps the community, keeps the forums tidy, and recognises useful contributions. Thanks!)

SAP Interactive Form is not installed

All,
I have installed NWDS 7.0.09. When I click 'Edit' on InteractiveForm component the Adobe LiveCycle Designer does not open.
I did download the Adobe LiveCycle designer Patch 7.0 from service marketplace. But when i try to install the same I get the following error:
This patch cannot be applied because 'SAP Interactive Forms' is not installed on this workstation!
Has anyone seen this error and can anyone advice as to what I need to do to get the Adobe LiveCycle Designer to work.
The message seems to be self explanatory the question then arises how to I load SAP Interactive Forms
SAP Partner

Hi
You have to first install Adobe LiveCycle Designer on your PC to be able to use InteractiveForms component in NWDS (Provided ADS is installed and configured in your landscape, ADS is installed by default in NW2004s installation, we can also have standalone ADS Server).
You can obtain the Adobe LiveCycle Designer 7.1 from https://service.sap.com/swdc -> Installations and Upgrades->SAP NetWeaver->SAP NETWEAVER->SAP NETWEAVER 2004S->Adobe LiveCycle Designer 7.1
Hope this helps!
Thanks & Regards,
Preetha Rethinam
null

General authorizations do not apply

estimated in the menu general authorizations, changes do not apply and there is no error message.
Someone who can help me solve this problem.
Thank you.

Hi Jose,
Please advice your SAP Version and Patch Level.
Please check below link.
Unable to change authorization(SAP B1 8.8 PL14
Hope this help
Regards::::
Atul Chakraborty

Connecting nodes with uninode -apply is not taking affect

Connecting nodes with uninode -apply
is not taking affect.

There are two problems with the utility uninode. They address different issues
and require different workarounds. Please review carefully.

<OL>
<LI>Applying changes to a nodes.ini
file using uninode where there is a mixture
of + and - nodes.

There is a problem with uninode where the flag -ALL doesn't completely update
all of the remote node information. If you are removing a node from a node
network, keep in mind that it is really a two step process: 
1)Connect to all "+" nodes and remove the "-" node from each of their databases.
2)Connect to the "-" node and remove the "+" nodes from that database.

The best possible workaround is to run uninode -apply ALL followed by
uninode -apply all.

<LI>Applying changes to a nodes.ini
file using uninode where there are special
rules of node connections (e.g. A->B: +1, etc.).

With this you are forced to use unidbfix -export
to generate your remotenodes.ini
file, and then you must manually edit this file as required. Run
unidbfix -import to
update the remotenode.dat file.

Run unidbfix -export
and then unidbfix -import
to update all the remote nodes
with the new information.
</OL>

HI All,
I've used the OITM along with the ITM1 and I still receive the "Updated Successful" message but no changes.
I created another pricelist within SAP B1 Client and updated the prices within that pricelist and it worked just fine.
I noticed when I queried everything from OPLN that the pricelists that I am trying to import have a different value for "Data Source" which is equal to O, I copied these price lists with Copy Express. The pricelist I created within SAP B1 Client has a Data Source = "I".
I've included the OITM and ITM file I used which was returning a successful result but no change.
ITM1
ParentKey LineNum PriceList Price Currency
ItemCode LineNum PriceList Price Currency
85108 25 26 55.00 $
OITM
ItemCode
ItemCode
85108

SAP NOTE APPLIED OR NOT?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for