SAP-QM(MIC)

Dear All ,
My material GI pipe is due for quality inspection. Its UOM in material master is u201CMu201D (Meter). Now if I want to create a master inspection characteristic u201CThicknessu201D thru QS21 on quantitative basis , how can I give lower and upper limit of testing thickness as 0.1-0.2mm(As UOM is M while characteristic UOM is MM).
Regards,

Hi Rohit
I think system will accept unit of measure in MIC as MM although in the material master it is Metre, because the UOM in the MM01 corresponds to the material whereas the UOM in MIC refers to the material dimensions. Also another suggestion, You can otherwise give the description of the MIC as "diameter in mm". This will help.
regards
Selva

Similar Messages

SAP MIC version 2.0

Hi,
Somebody already obtain to include new fields in SAP MIC( Management Internal Controls) version 2.0?
Att.
Anderson Almeida

You need to study the PCUI (People Centric User Interface).
MIC software use this engine to control the web interface.
Very complete guide:
https://websmp209.sap-ag.de/~sapidb/011000358700001093962006E/PCUIBook50_06.pdf
a quick intro by weblog:
/people/vijaya.kumar/blog/2005/06/10/people-centric-user-interface-pcui--getting-started
Regards,
Sergio

Problem in displaying the data of columns into rows in sap script

hi,
i am working on a sap script and i have to display the dat which is displayed in column into rows but it is not displaying it properly.
eg, C
    12.1
    Si
    5.5
it is displaying the data right now like this but i want to display the data like this:-
eg, C      Si
    12.1   5.5
plzzprovide me guidelines how to solve this problem.

hi,
i am using this code to display the data:-
plzz provide me guidelines where i am getting wrong?
TOPparCOMPONENT DESP,,,,,, INS. LOT #, , , , , , MIC,,,,,,,,,, MIC VALUEparENDTOPparFINAL
PROTECT
IF &I_FINAL-PRUEFLOS& NE '000000000000'
&I_FINAL-MAKTX(23)&&i_final-prueflos(12Z)&
&I_FINAL-kurztext(25)&
&I_FINAL-original_input(8)&
ELSE
&I_FINAL-MAKTX(23)&
&I_FINAL-kurztext(25)&
&I_FINAL-original_input(8)&
ENDIF
ENDPROTECT
ITEMHEAD
POSITION WINDOW
SIZE WIDTH +0 . 4 CH HEIGHT +1 LN
BOX FRAME 10 TW
BOX HEIGHT '1.35' LN INTENSITY 20
IF &PAGE& = '1'
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '0' CM HEIGHT '43' LN FRAME '10' TW
For horizontal line at top
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '75' CH HEIGHT '0' LN FRAME '10' TW
COLUMN LINES...
END OF COLUMN LINES...
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '43' LN WIDTH '75' CH HEIGHT '0' LN FRAME '10'TW
BOX XPOS '75' CH YPOS '0' LN WIDTH '0' CH HEIGHT '43' LN FRAME '10'TW
ELSE
COLUMN LINES...
END OF COLUMN LINES...
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '0' CM HEIGHT '47' LN FRAME '10' TW
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '75' CH HEIGHT '0' LN FRAME '10' TW
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '45' CM HEIGHT '0' LN FRAME '10' TW
BOX XPOS '20' CH YPOS '0' CM WIDTH '0' CM HEIGHT '47' LN FRAME '10' TW
BOX XPOS '0' CH YPOS '47' LN WIDTH '75' CH HEIGHT '0' LN FRAME '10'TW
BOX XPOS '75' CH YPOS '0' LN WIDTH '0' CH HEIGHT '47' LN FRAME '10'TW
ENDIF
LINEFEED
NEWPAGE
NEW-PAGE
provide me guidelines to solve this problem.
Edited by: ricx .s on Mar 13, 2009 5:58 AM

Table for Long Texts of MICs in Tasklist

Dear All
Can any body tell me from which SAP table i can get the LONG TEXT maintained for MICs in any tasklist.
Table PLMK only shows wether long text maintained or not, but i want the value in LONG TEXT.
thanks
Zeeshan

This may be helpful.
SAP stores comments (text fields) in a separate table. STXH is the text
"header" table (STXD SAPscript text file header). STXH-TDOBJECT =
'KNA1' will bring back all the customer comment headers. STXH-
TDNAME='0000010744' is the header record for the comment for customer
10744.
It is not always so simple to figure out what the TDOBJECT (object needed by function below - sometimes it is a table name, other times...), TDNAME (name needed by function below - sometimes it is a document number & line item or customer number, other times... ) & TDID (id needed by function below - it is always the long text id). There are several methods that can be used. You can create the long text that you are researching and using, SE16 for table STXH search TDLUSER = to your kerberos principal and TDLDATE = to today's date. This is modify date & user. Alternatively, you can find an existing item with the long text and figure out the date and user who last modified it and use this information in your search. Once you have STXH row for text of interest, use ZCAFTXT to test your research. Project Titles and WBS Titles are a bit more complex.
Changes to sales contract long text between 3.0F and 4.5B.
The following code is a function that will return a customer comment.
form get_comment using cur_kunnr.
call function 'READ_TEXT'
       exporting
            id                      = '0002'
            language                = sy-langu
            object                  = 'KNA1'
            name                    = cur_kunnr
       importing
            header                  = thead
       tables
            lines                   = tlinetab
       exceptions
            id                      = 1
            language                = 2
            name                    = 3
            not_found               = 4
            object                  = 5
            reference_check         = 6
            wrong_access_to_archive = 7
            others                  = 8.
if sy-subrc = 0.
    loop at tlinetab.
      write / tlinetab-tdline.
      add 1 to line_cnt.
    endloop.
endif.
endform.
The above subroutine is called with the following code:
if p_cmnt = 'X'.
   tdname = cur_cust-kunnr.
   perform get_comment using tdname.
endif.
These data elements are defined as:
data: begin of tlinetab occurs 100.    "table to process comments
        include structure tline.
data: end of tlinetab.
data: tdname           like thead-tdname.
Vishal Jonnalwar

QM Sceneri: MIC which has it Limits dependent on the results of a MIC.

QM Scenerio
The plan has multiple MIC's all with limits. First five MIC's are independent and rest three are having their limits dependent on the results of a MIC eg with a formula. say 0.8X lower limit and 1.1X upper limit of a MIC., where X is the result of the fifth MIC. Similarly the 7th and the 8th MIC's are having limits dependent on the same MIC with different formula.
This kind of scenerio may be two times in an inspection Plan.
Can the Gurus kindly give me the solution how to do it.

No. Nothing that is standard. You will have to probably look at creating your own custom valuation FM. SAP allows you to create these FM's and then config them into the system. You would then selection the custom valuation in a sample procedure that you would create for each of these characteristics. The valuation for the characteristic would then be carried out according to your custom FM. No spec would be displayed in the inspection lot however. But he valuation should be possible.
FF

Differences between MIC and Process control

Hi
Could someone please let me know what are the major differences between MIC and process control 2.5.
I have heard that Process control 2.0 is not being used now.
So could you please let me know what the differences for MIC and Process control 2.5.
Regards
Sandhya

Hi Sandhya,
the major differences are:
- automated controls (SAP and non-SAP systems)
- UI interface based on NetWeaver Business Client (NWBC)
- flexibility on scheduling assessments and tests based on control attributes
- configurable reports and extraction to either .pdf or .xls
- possibility to se configure workflow to send reminders and escalations
- integration with Access Control 5.3, RAR component
- concept of service providers allowing controls to be referenced between different organizations (former MIC orgunit)
- assessments based on surveys (questions to be answered)
- effectiveness tests based on test plan (both tests and steps)
Regards
Andre Yuji

Use of Classification in MIC

Hi All,
I know the relation of Class type 023 (Batch) and classification in the Material master.But what is the use of having Classification in Master Inspection Charecteristic, is there any relation between class type 005 (masterinspection charecteristic) and classification in MIC ?
Please advise me in this regards,
Regards,
Raj

Dear,
Find the changes done to the characterisctics( values in the class type). So 023 and 005 are the calss type.
Each class must be assigned to exactly one class type. There is no connection between the individual class types.
The class type is used to define a number of parameters, such as:
1)The objects that can be classified in a class
2)Whether objects of different object types can be classified in the same class
3)Whether an object can be classified in more than one class of the same class type
4)The class maintenance screens that can be processed
The system compares the classification of two objects only if values were assigned for all characteristics of the class. based on the calss the system will check the values as per the class for the batch or MIC. So SAP has by default define 023 for batch managment and 005 for MICN and 300 for configuracle material which use in variant configuration..etc.
When you create classification data, the system asks you to choose a class type in a dialog box. If necessary, you can change the class type on the screen, where you assign the material to one or more classes. Entries are made in the Description, Status, and Icon fields automatically on the basis of the classes you have chosen. If you have assigned the material to more than one class, you can flag one of the classes as the standard class. You can then assign values to the characteristics. For example, if the characteristic is color, you can assign it the value blue .
You need to assign the Characteristic to a Batch class
And This batch class must be assigned to the material master in Classification view, Class type 023.
So first perform the Assignment of Characteristic to Batch Class and Assigne this batch class to Material.
You can check the result for the Characteristic in,
MSC2/3N
MSC5N
BMBC
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Vendor wise MIC Limit

Dear Gurs,
Pls help me for the scenario as mentioned followed.
I have a one material. for that there is a 3 differenet vendors. for that material Length is a one MIC.but as per vendor limit is different. I don't want to use a 3 different MIC for vendor wise. Requirment is One Material, One MIC but Limit should be come in Inspection plan as per vendor.
MIC u2013 length
Vendors u2013 A,B and C
Vendor Spec for length for the SAME material u2013 10-12cm,10-18cm,10-20cm (A,B and C vendors)
For GR if vendor is B then for that Inspcection lot limit of the MIC legnth should be reflected as a 10-18 cm.
Thanks in advance for help.

Hi Mihir,
There are two ways to incorporate the requirement.
1. Create that much number of task list counters for the inspection plans, same as the Vendors you have. I means One Task list group counter 01 will be assigned to Material 'M' Vendor 'A', counter 02 for Material 'M' Vendor 'B', & counter 03 for Material 'M' Vendor 'C'.
2. Refer the [wiki document|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/SameParameters-DifferentSpecifications]
Regards,
Shyamal

Replace MIC in mass mode

Hello SAP Guru,
I want to replace one mic in mass for that i got transaction QS27 but when i go to overview screen system show me lock in first coloum i tried mic in refrance mode & copy modal mode also but not able to replace it please suggest.
regards,

In QCC0->basic settings->maintain setting at client level----->tick on Replace MIC
Then you will get list in QS27 t code.select the line with green symbol & click on Replace
I hope this will help

MIC's of finished product should get transferred to Semi-finished product

Hi all,
I have the following requirement
Based on the Customer requirement, sales order will be created. Two line items will be created in the sales order.
First item: 100kg
Second item: 5 kg (this will be the sample to be sent to the customer for approval)
first item and second item will have different material codes.
Now the process order will be created,released and confirmed. 04 inspection type will be activated for the material.
The MIC's of the finished product ( A) should get transferred to the semi-finished product (A1)
For X customer the MIC's for finished product (A) is a1, a2 and a3 and same should get transferred to semi finished product (A1 )
For Y customer the MIC's for finished product (B) is b1, b2 and b3 and same should get transferred to semi finished product (A1 )
The material code for the finished product will be different, but the semi-finished product (A1) will be same always.
When ever inspection lot gets generated the MIC's of the finished material should get transferred to semi finished product
Kindly provide your valuable inputs to address this scenario
Regards
Hari

I think I understand what you are attempting to do. The bottom line is that you are trying to use one material number to serve as the "sample material" for all your products. Lets call the sample material mrtrl# 9000122.
You have a make to order process so you first create a process order for the product and inspect it according to the customer's requirements. You make the UD.
Now when you make product A, you want those characteristic MIC values to copy to the sample material 9000122 inspection lot which is created from a separate process order using product A as the raw material.
When you make product B, you want those MIC charcteristic values to copy to the same sample material 9000122 to an inspection lot created from a separate process order using product B as the raw material.
I am guessing the intent is to keep the batch number the same between the FERT product batch number and the sample material.
I would like to suggest to you two other alternatives which I'm not sure will work for your design but I think it is worth a try and might save some work.
1) Have you looked at setting up your sample product as a by-product of the first process order? You can confirm the finished qty and the sample qty from the same original process order. This will then create your two 04 inspection lots. You would recrod results on the first primary product. Then enter results recording and I think you'll be able to have that set up to copy over the resutls from the primary product. If you can't with the standard SAP, I beleive you'll find the ability in copy inspection results to add your own custom FM that would do the copy for you that you are looking for.
Of course the inspection plan for the by-product sample will have to have all the characteristics in the plan that could ever be expected from any primary product using this process.
2) The other possibility would be to just have the person making the UD on the primary inspection products inspection lot, to post a sample qty "to other quantity". They would always of course post to the sample material. If the characteristics in the lot match up to general characteristics in the batch class for the sample, the resutls will be transferred to the batch. Report your sample reuslts from the batch record and the specs from the inspection lot in the COA.
FF

MICs duplicated in COA (Certificate For Analysis) for Finish Product.

Hi, Champions,
I have problem in printing COA:
We are using TL type "Q" inspection plan.
         Operation:1 Chemical Test
                       MIC:0010 Test-1
                       MIC:0020 Test-2
         Operation:2 Physical Test
                       MIC:0010 Test-1
                       MIC:0020 Test-2
                       MIC:0030 Test-3
Manageing individual COA profile for each Material.
We have customized COA report.
When we are trying to take printout from it, it is printing the COA for all the Operations two times. Means one more time then it is there in the Task List.
The parameters for the COA Profile are as below.
      1. Level for Result Selection: - Summarized
      2. Origin of the Characteristic Result on the Certificate: - Inspection Result.
      3. Origin of Characteristic Short Text: - Master Inspection Charecteristic.
      4. Origin of Inspection Specifications: - Inspection specfication from QM.
      5. Output Strategy for Skip Characteristics: - Text from text element of function group.
Pls let me know, where is the possibility of cause for this descipancy in COA.
Regards,
Shyamal

Hi Craig,
Thanks for your involvement.
The layout that is generated by QC21 was no where meeting the requirement. So layout was configured. Then data was there in big number of verity hence all the detrails was requried to be fatched from Inspection plan itself. Not from MICs (QS21,,as STD report does).
These were the circumstances. And it was propoerly tested and is working fine also.
But recently we had SAP GO LIVE for, two more mfg facility(Plant) and it is showing this bug overhere only.
But any ways thank you all for kind support.
Regards,
Shyamal

SAP QM reports

Hi
Please let me know what are reports avaialable in SAP QM.
I need Daily/monthly/shiftwise quality cleared list of fabricated material/raw materials/finished materials.
Regards
Pooja

Hi Pooja,
List of All The Standard QM Reports
A list of all the standard QM reports and their description:
QA33   : Inspection Lot List
              Quality report against Inspection Lot - Results
QC55   : Quality Certificate List in Procurements
MMBE : Material stock overview u2013 Quality / Unrestricted / Block etc.
MB52   : Ware House stock & Valuation (Quality / Unrestricted / Block etc.)
MB51   : Material document List
CC04    : Display product Structure
MCXC : Material Analysis (Month wise)
MCXI   : Material analysis
MCXB : Material inspection result analysis
MCVA : Vendor analysis u2013 material inspection lot wise
MCOA : Customer analysis u2013 m aterial inspection lot wise
QGA2    : Inspection results day wise
QS28     : List of Master Inspection Characteristics
QS26     : MIC where used lists
QS38     : List of Inspection methods
QS36     : Inspection method where used lists.
QS49     : Code Groups & Codes
QS59     : Selected sets
QM11    : Display Quality notification Lists
QM19    : Multilevel Quality notification List
MCXV   : Quality Notification analysis
Thanks ,
Srinivaas

Display of MIC results - period based

Dear All
It is required for me get a report for material-period combination for the results recorded against a MIC.This can be against different Inspection lots also.
I need to get this for a week / fortnight in a single screen / ALV.Is there any std. transaction available in SAP for the same.
Anil S

Use MCXB or MCXD
Regards
Mahesh

Differences and Similarities between MIC and PC3.0

Hello Friends,
Can anyone please provide me information about the following:
1. Is PC3.0 next version of MIC?
2. Can MIC be upgraded to PC3.0?
3. If yes, how the data is migrated from MIC to PC3.0?
4. What are the master data objects in MIC exactly match with that of PC3.0?
5. What is the functionality of MIC that matched with PC3.0?
6. What are major diffrences and similarities in MIC and PC3.0?
Appreciate your help here!
Regards, Ben

Dear Ben,
let me try to answer your questions:
1. Is PC3.0 next version of MIC?
MIC is a predecessor product for PC 3.0. With the aquisition of Virsa there was a new product introduced with the name "Process Control".
2. Can MIC be upgraded to PC3.0?
+There is a migration path for MIC 1.0 and MIC 2.0 to PC 3.0.
3. If yes, how the data is migrated from MIC to PC3.0?
You can find documentation for this in the service marketplace. There is a migration guide for MIC to PC 3.0. In The BPX there are also guides produced by the GRC RIG team.
4. What are the master data objects in MIC exactly match with that of PC3.0?
5. What is the functionality of MIC that matched with PC3.0?
MIC was mainly build to support SOX compliance. PC 3.0 not only supports SOX compliance but theoretically as many compliance initiatives as you want. Both share a central organizational structure, a central contol catalogue, issue and remediation workflows for evaluations.
6. What are major diffrences and similarities in MIC and PC3.0?
PC 3.0 comes with a multi compliance framework, supports automated control tests, has much stronger reporting capabilities and export to excel. PC 3.0 has surveys and test plans and integration wit Risk Management 3.0.
You can look up more detailed information here:
Service Marketplace:
service.sap.com/rkt -> SAP BusinessObjects GRC Solutions -> ....
BPX community:
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/grc .....
help.sap.com -> SAP BusinessObjects -> GRC solutions -> ....

Inspection Plan & MIC status.

Dear SAP,
We have a requirement that QC will creat the MIC & Inspection Plan in status created, and QA will review and change the status from Created to Release.So where or in which object level i can put control so that QC not able to select the Status 4 for inspection plan, and Release for MIC.
Regards,
Asif.

Dear Craig,
I have created a new roll will basis help.and attached the below condition in the object you can refer dow.But then to user able to create MIC & Inspection plan in release mode.Please explain what would be the issue.
MIC Status Table & Field Name (Object Name-Q_STA_QPMK,Table-QPMK, Field-LOEKZ)
Inspection Plan Status Table & Field Name (Object Name-Q_ROUT,Table-PLKPO, Field-VERWE)
QSTATMERK Master Inspection Characteristic Status 1
STATU Status 1
Regards,
Asif

SAP-QM(MIC)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for