SAPPXchTest results for CDO version
Hi,
I am trying to configure collaboration in the EP6 SP14 portal. I have followed all the documentation (I believe). However, when I run the CDO version test via the SAPPXXchTest.exe we see the following message.
Microsoft Outlook is not configured for Corporate/Workgroup access. Reconfigure Microsoft Outlook and try again.
Can someone explain what this means?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards,
Rick
Hi Akhilesh,
The sapexchangetest.exe is running. Please see the below output from the Data Retrieval test.
BEGIN 7/28/2006 6:55:47 AM----
URL: HTTP://ep6qa.corp.oge.com:81/Calendar.asp
URL Parameters: Server=ogemail&[email protected]&Action=READ&StartDate=200607281509&EndDate=200607291509&[email protected]&Debug=true
Reponse: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='yes'?>
<!DOCTYPE OUTPUT [<!ELEMENT OUTPUT (FAILURE|APPOINTMENTS)>
<!ELEMENT FAILURE (ERRORNUMBER?, ERRORMESSAGE?, CLASSNAME?, METHODNAME?, LINENUMBER?, PARAMETERS?)>
<!ELEMENT ERRORNUMBER (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ERRORMESSAGE (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT CLASSNAME (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT METHODNAME (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT LINENUMBER (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT PARAMETERS (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT APPOINTMENTS (APPOINTMENT*)>
<!ELEMENT APPOINTMENT (ID, SUBJECT?, LOCATION?, STARTDATE, ENDDATE, MEETINGTYPE, ALLDAY, RECURRING, RECURRENCEEXCEPTION?, BUSYSTATUS?)>
<!ELEMENT ID (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT SUBJECT (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT LOCATION (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT STARTDATE (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ENDDATE (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT MEETINGTYPE (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT ALLDAY (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT RECURRING (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT RECURRENCEEXCEPTION (#PCDATA)>
<!ELEMENT BUSYSTATUS (#PCDATA)>]><OUTPUT><APPOINTMENTS><APPOINTMENT><ID>FF000000ED0392EFA5B91B10ACC100AA004233260200000046000000000000000000000001000000000000009C88F0993374D411BD6300805F9F8C5B0700E584EC46E9CED111BD0200805F9F8C5B0000033203070000CDEA2BAED7C62C4BB98E4FD98129002100000A4961720000:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E0080000000050754D379CA6C6010000000000000000100000002EE2314E0F5D5849AF871569A2A4C3E0</ID><SUBJECT><![CDATA[Meet & Greet with Duane]]></SUBJECT><LOCATION><![CDATA[SB2_CONF_N1]]></LOCATION><STARTDATE>200607281600</STARTDATE><ENDDATE>200607281700</ENDDATE><MEETINGTYPE>3</MEETINGTYPE><ALLDAY>False</ALLDAY><RECURRING>False</RECURRING><BUSYSTATUS>2</BUSYSTATUS></APPOINTMENT><APPOINTMENT><ID>FF000000ED0392EFA5B91B10ACC100AA00423326020000004600000000000000AED9B60C03000000000000009C88F0993374D411BD6300805F9F8C5B0700E584EC46E9CED111BD0200805F9F8C5B00000332030700008D4B702AD9388247BA0CD2119B9AEDDC0000001D88480000:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E00800000000000000000000000000000000000000004D0000007643616C2D556964010000004344303030303030384239353131443138324438303043303446423136323544344335323241334438453939343434313834373430343231363734323346393800</ID><SUBJECT><![CDATA[]]></SUBJECT><STARTDATE>200607282030</STARTDATE><ENDDATE>200607282200</ENDDATE><MEETINGTYPE>0</MEETINGTYPE><ALLDAY>False</ALLDAY><RECURRING>True</RECURRING><BUSYSTATUS>3</BUSYSTATUS></APPOINTMENT><APPOINTMENT><ID>FF000000ED0392EFA5B91B10ACC100AA00423326020000004600000000000000AED9B60C03000000000000009C88F0993374D411BD6300805F9F8C5B0700E584EC46E9CED111BD0200805F9F8C5B0000033203070000CDEA2BAED7C62C4BB98E4FD98129002100000A49606B0000:040000008200E00074C5B7101A82E0080000000080942A99B699C60100000000000000001000000062180C8D42292C45AEF312BBA93B2506</ID><SUBJECT><![CDATA[ ]]></SUBJECT><STARTDATE>200607282030</STARTDATE><ENDDATE>200607282200</ENDDATE><MEETINGTYPE>0</MEETINGTYPE><ALLDAY>False</ALLDAY><RECURRING>True</RECURRING><BUSYSTATUS>2</BUSYSTATUS></APPOINTMENT></APPOINTMENTS></OUTPUT>
END 7/28/2006 6:55:47 AM----
The output looks like what the troubleshooting section shows it should. I did change the virtual path as it was wrong, but I still see the same error.
Thanks again for all your help.
Regards,
Rick
Similar Messages
-
Found 0 results for When I open Firefox I get a "Well this is embarrassing" message. Makes no difference if I click on "Start a new session" or "Restore", it crashes. Then I get a "crash report" which apparently goes nowhere. I have uninstalled and reinstalled twice with the same result, what do I do to restore Firefox?
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== Last week when I opened Firefox.The crash reporter doesn't appear to be working...Here are the details that were contained in the report:
Add-ons: {0538E3E3-7E9B-4d49-8831-A227C80A7AD3}:0.9.10.2, :3.63,{972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}:3.6.3
BuildID: 20100401064631
Comments: I get an error message, " well, this is embarrassing"..and Firefox crashes
CrashTime: 1274739017
EMCheckCompatibility: true
Email: [email protected]
FramePoisonBase: 00000000f0dea000
FramePoisonSize: 4096
InstallTime: 1270304892
ProductName: Firefox
ReleaseChannel: release
SecondsSinceLastCrash: 2699
StartupTime: 1274738966
Theme: classic/1.0
Throttleable: 1
Vendor: Mozilla
Version: 3.6.3
This report also contains technical information about the state of the application when it crashed. -
The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue. -
SOLVED - BIOS UPDATE "SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTAIN the NECESSARY WMI SUPPORT for this VERSION of HPQflash
If you get infamous error when updating HP Portables (laptops/notebooks/ netbooks) BIOS within Windows:
"SYSTEM DOES NOT CONTAIN THE NECESSARY WMI SUPPORT FOR THIS VERSION OF HPQFLASH":
I am posting a solution found for own business laptop (HP 8540W & 8760W) so WebSearch engines index/register it in a few days - future sufferers come here and get a SOLUTION, finally. Disreagrd previous "experts" advises, they don't work 100% & pity on TechSupport folks who get HP paychecks yet don't know products their co. designs/manufactures (on deep Technical level):
Below is a SOLUTION (WORKING) !
Go into Services (Run "services.msc" or get there thru ControlPanel-->AdminTools-->), find following 2 services ==> make sure they're running, chances are they're NOT (as in my case I keep them disabled unless need running):
1) "HP Software Framework"
2) "HP Service" [no typo - a real plain name]
If not running, set Properties-->Manual and click "Start", make sure both are running.
Rerun BIOS updater, choose option for "Within Windows" or something to that effect (using HPQ/ROMpaq updater), rather than "create USB BootDisk on Key", this time it should work without the hassle of a BootDisk creation.
Should work from within Windows environment.
Notes:
a) Likely only one (1) service is responsible - namely "HP Software Framework" for HPQ Updater to fail, but doesn't hurt to reenable/restart both services.
I in fact am responding to other customers who elect to Update BIOS within Windows, perhaps oldfashioned but to me Boot Updater is more natural & always works regardless of WMI Support.
b) After done, don't forget:
*) Recheck BIOS settings - update may've added new and/or changed old, so rescan tobe sure.
**) Go BACK into Windows-->Services.msc & redisable both aforementioned Services if were originally disabled; or you're a computer Pro, you know what you're doing & like me keep all HP services disabled. The ones we got on EliteBook 8760W are pests consuming system resources, you just enable "Software Framework" when occasional issues emerge with HP softupdate (typically no issues) & redisable after use, rest of services are bloatware - some attempt to overrun Windows Wireless console, some seekout HP Networked printers (Ethernet, Wireless, but not USB), some do this & that - I study/know which one does what and decided to disable all. This is called a "minimalist" philosophy & turns your machine into a fast beast, I recently sold a very obsolete 4-year laptop which however handles 3DMCAD & complex designs/simulations, better new machines out fo a store, as new machines are loaded w/bloatware chocking down resources.
BUT nobody is requiring you to disable anything though.
The solution merely states the fact:
These 2 (or 1) services when not running halt BIOS Update "within Windows" (you can still run "BootDisk option", however, if preferred).
Simply restartung them solves your problem. Usually
Ya'll have a good day and enjoy!
===========
BELOW ARE IMPORTANT WARNINGS:
1) IF YOUR BIOS UPDATE STILL FAILS, SOME OTHER PIECE IN WMI SUPPORT IS MISSING - IN MY CASE WAS THESE 2 SERVICES, BUT THERE'S REMOTE POSSIBILITY SOMETHING ELSE MIGHT BLOCK UPDATER. DON'T WASTE TIME & CHOOSE "USB/BootDisk" options instead
2) Once BIOS updater does its job, will ask to auto-restart - let it go on & complete, it will self-shutdown (click "Next" to skip 60-second timer), then do NOT turn it on manually!, wait - it'll turn on by itself in 15 seconds, let it boot into Windows, you're done!
3) WARNING: close other apps before proceeding, be 100% sure your ACpower won't be interrupted or better yet - make sure battery is in/charged (so if ACpower accidentally disconnects, you're autoswitched onto battery) b/c power loss may result in severe damage to internal hardware. In the old days it'd result in fatal damage, these days powerloss would still result in a major repair (ROM chip corruption).
So to summarize: those 2 services I specified, are often responsible for whether HPQ/ROMpaq will or won't run.
Other causes possible, but I've not witnessed; and if so - choose BootDisk option.
===
Stan M. Starinski, MSEE.Hello Ceramics.
Your ProBook is an Enterprise model. It would be a good idea to also post your question to the HP Business Boards as those forums deal specifically with that kind of product. Here is a link.
Have a great day!
Please click the white star under my name to give me Kudos as a way to say "Thanks!"
Click the "Accept as Solution" button if I resolve your issue. -
Found 0 results for My browser is missing important items, the whole tool bar...., drop down menu to print, copy, work off line, file, save, book mark, history. I just installed latest foxfire on windows xp. Found some instructions but they called for using keys my computer doesn't have ( key in OSX There is no file, edit , history, help, tools, navigation, all the things your directions say to use. Also I always get hung up and the message a scrip is running. I don't know what thises scrips are but I sure don't need them.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== I just noticed it. It probably happened when I upgraded foxfire.<u>'''Can't see the Menu Bar'''</u> (File, Edit, View, History, Bookmarks, Tools, Help)?
Turning the Menu Bar on and off is a new feature in version 3.6.
''(Linux & OSX see: [[Menu bar is missing]] )''
<u>''Windows'' Method 1.</u> '''''Hold down''''' the key and press the following letters in this exact order: V T M
<u>''Windows'' Method 2.</u> Press and release the key. The Menu Bar will be displayed; then choose ~~red:V~~iew > ~~red:T~~oolbars and click on ~~red:M~~enu Bar.
The Menu Bar should now be displayed permanently, unless you turn it off again using View > Toolbars. Check mark = displayed, NO check mark = not displayed.
See: http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Menu+bar+is+missing
<u>'''Navigation Toolbar, Bookmarks Toolbar and other Toolbars'''</u> under View > Toolbars. Clicking on one of them will place a check mark (display) or remove the check mark (not displayed).
<u>'''To display the Status Bar'''</u>, View, then click Status bar to place a check mark (display) or remove the check mark (not displayed).
<u>'''Full Screen mode'''</u>
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Netbooks#Full_screen
Also see:
''' [[Back and forward or other toolbar buttons are missing]]'''
'''[[Navigation Toolbar items]]''' -
VBAI2011 Save for Previous Version option
Hello,
Since VBAI 2011 is one of NI products, I am curious that it has an option of Save As For Previous version like Labview, or is there any way around it?.
I currenlty have running Labview 8.6 in my systems which doesn't work well with VBAI 2011. What I have done is using Labview 2012 evaluation version to re-save my VI 8.6 till to 2010 version. I am thinking an option of down-grade my VBAI if possible.
Thanks.
Hoa Huynh
University of MinnesotaNot sure if you're aware, but you can use the Vision Builder API in LabVIEW to control an any version of VBAI 2010 or greater with any version of LV 8.5 or higher. There is a shipping example located in your Vision Builder AI\API Examples folder. The API has several advantages over migrating your inspection to LabVIEW, so you might want to check it out. Here is a web video of how to use the API to control VBAI, run inspections, and get the results and images:
http://zone.ni.com/wv/app/doc/p/id/wv-2424
Hopefully Vision Builder will eventually support saving for previous, but until then, using the API allows you to use a variety of LabVIEW versions with a variety of VBAI versions.
Hope this helps,
Brad -
After I updated to yosemite my iMovie will not open. I have found the folders in the applications folder for both versions 9 and 10 but neither one opens when I double click on the icon. How do I remedy this?
Launch the Console application in any of the following ways:
☞ Enter the first few letters of its name into a Spotlight search. Select it in the results (it should be at the top.)
☞ In the Finder, select Go ▹ Utilities from the menu bar, or press the key combination shift-command-U. The application is in the folder that opens.
☞ Open LaunchPad. Click Utilities, then Console in the icon grid.
The title of the Console window should be All Messages. If it isn't, select
SYSTEM LOG QUERIES ▹ All Messages
from the log list on the left. If you don't see that list, select
View ▹ Show Log List
from the menu bar at the top of the screen. Click the Clear Display icon in the toolbar. Then take one of the actions that you're having trouble with. Select any messages that appear in the Console window. Copy them to the Clipboard by pressing the key combination command-C. Paste into a reply to this message by pressing command-V.
The log contains a vast amount of information, almost all of which is irrelevant to solving any particular problem. When posting a log extract, be selective. A few dozen lines are almost always more than enough.
Please don't indiscriminately dump thousands of lines from the log into this discussion.
Please don't post screenshots of log messages—post the text.
Some private information, such as your name, may appear in the log. Anonymize before posting. -
Looking for older version of Itunes to run on Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.6GHZ Windows XP
looking for older version of iTunes to run on Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.6GHZ Windows XP
? Please read my original post again. Maybe how I said it was confusing but that is exactly how I checked it... in VISTA. Exactly the way the link you gave me described.
You do understand the message I am getting says: *itunes.exe has been set to run in compatibility mode for older version of windows. For best results, turn off compatibility mode for itunes before you open it.* I am interpreting this to mean that compatibility is set for something OTHER then VISTA since it it saying "for and older version of Windows".
When you tell me to "Check the compatibility mode in Vista not iTunes" what the heck do you even mean? How do you check compatibility in iTunes?
Thanks for trying to help, but not sure you read my post as I intended. I have seen one other post that mentioned the same problem, but that post never got a response that was helpful.
Thanks for trying. Later !
p.s. I still need help from someone. -
SMP results for Solaris on Intel
Does anyone have or know where I can find SMP results for Solaris on Intel?
I work for a .com that is trying to decide whether or not to use 8-way Dell's or SPARC.
Opinions welcome.
Thanks in advance -
JonSolaris Intel version has existed since around 1992; source trees for Sparc and Intel were merged at 2.4 so the products (ignoring HW differences) are identical.
2.6 has reached "End Of Life" - contact your Sun sales representative if you have requiremnts for product/support going into the future.
Otherwise focus on Solaris 8, the currently shipping **FREE** version (subject to terms) at www.sun.com/software/solaris/binaries -
SQL 2008R2 DBCC MEMORYSTATUS empty results for values Target Committed ???
Im following this interesting article on looking at various queries to gather information on system load
https://www.simple-talk.com/sql/database-administration/why-is-that-sql-server-instance-under-stress/
The query that looks at DBCC MEMORYSTATUS for 'Target Committed' and 'Current Committed', but no results are returned. Loolking at just the raw output from DBCC MEMORYSTATUS, I dont see those metrics in any of the result sets returned.
This is the query (credit goes to author of article linked above)
DECLARE @MemStat TABLE
(ValueName SYSNAME,
Val BIGINT
INSERT INTO @MemStat
EXEC ('DBCC MEMORYSTATUS() WITH TABLERESULTS'
WITH Measures
AS (SELECT TOP 2
CurrentValue,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY OrderColumn) AS RowOrder
FROM (SELECT CASE WHEN (ms.ValueName = 'Target Committed')
THEN ms.Val
WHEN (ms.ValueName = 'Current Committed')
THEN ms.Val
END AS 'CurrentValue',
0 AS 'OrderColumn'
FROM @MemStat AS ms
) AS MemStatus
WHERE CurrentValue IS NOT NULL
SELECT TargetMem.CurrentValue - CurrentMem.CurrentValue
FROM Measures AS TargetMem
JOIN Measures AS CurrentMem
ON TargetMem.RowOrder + 1 = CurrentMem.RowOrder;Hi,
You are correct there is no Memory object like Target Committed and Current Committed in SQL server 2008 SP3 and SQL server 2008 R2 SP1( at least in my case) .I guess this must be for specific version which Grant missed to point out. But query does
not seems corretc to me as it is not working for all editions.
More over he mentioned that if Target server memory is greater than total server memory this is memory pressure. This is always not correct I have seen situation where this was case and I am sure there was no memory pressure. I guess he must be talking in
General term. Generally Target and total server memory values or equal on stable system sometimes due to bad query Target can go high but that is not exactly the memory pressure. If you see contantly that target is greater than total this can be memory pressure
but you should also consider looking at Buffer cache hit ratio,page life expactany,free pages,checkpoint pages
I will check further on 2012
Please mark this reply as answer if it solved your issue or vote as helpful if it helped so that other forum members can benefit from it.
My TechNet Wiki Articles -
I searched for "Download FireFox 5 - got the following results: Found 1023 results for download firefox 5 in English. Please save me from having to wade through 1023 results to locate this download!
Why do you want the 5.0 version and not the just released Firefox 6 version?
*Firefox 6.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
*Firefox 3.6.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all-older.html
*http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/latest-5.0/ -
my firefox does not work because of this error.
firefox.exe-application error: Found 0 results for the instruction at "0x00b48d37" reference memory at "0x00bd37". the memory could not be "read".Do a clean (re)install and delete the Firefox program folder (C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\).
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 8.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Uninstall your current Firefox version if possible.
*Do NOT remove personal data when you uninstall the current version or you lose your bookmarks and other data in the profile folder.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
*It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup
See also:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall -
How to get item field values for old versions?
I need to be able to query old field values from previous versions of items in a SharePoint list. I can't execute code on the server (it needs to work with SharePoint Online/O365 for a start).
So far the ONLY API I've that lets me do this is the lists.asmx GetVersionCollection SOAP call.
This lets me specify a single field name and returns an XML structure with the values for the various versions, along with the modification time and who made the change - but NO reliable way of actually identifying *which* version (i.e. an ID or label). That
is, if I know I need to fetch the Title value from version 512 ("1.0") of item 1 in list "Documents", I don't see how to reliably parse the results to determine which entry is version 512. While they may be returned in order, in many cases
the entries are actually missing when there was no field value present (or perhaps when the field hadn't been created yet). I've tried comparing the Modified date to the Created date of the corresponding FileVersion item (which I can get via CSOM or REST),
and while it works some of the time, it's not reliable. I've also looked at the output from the lists.asmx GetVersion API but I don't see how that's useful either, as the Created property for all versions always seems to be just the date the file was originally
created.
It does seem odd to me that there's not a neat way of doing this - if I need to return information for several fields but just for a single version, I have to make a whole lot of requests that return far more info than I need, and then I need to figure out
how to parse the returned text in the case of, say, multiple-value taxonomy fields etc.
Anyone tried doing anything similar here?
Thanks
Dylantry these links:
https://support.office.microsoft.com/en-us/article/Track-and-view-version-information-for-SharePoint-list-items-2d69d936-fb0b-4c84-830e-11708e6ec317?CorrelationId=f87cf6ea-8cbf-446a-a4a0-e2c3a86b3425&ui=en-US&rs=en-US&ad=US
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/e48ff216-7ed1-4b20-9f21-d496b1583eea/how-to-get-item-field-values-for-old-versions?forum=sharepointdevelopment
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/20019/get-meta-data-from-a-previous-version-of-a-document-through-webservice-in-moss-2
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/121594/getting-information-from-previous-versions-of-a-sp-list-using-csom
Please mark answer as correct if it is correct else vote for it if you find it useful Happy SharePointing -
Benchmark Results for CS4, attn. Bill Gehrke
Bill (and others interested),
I have now tweaked my system a bit and done some simple benchmarking to see if I did it right. There is not yet a PPBM+ benchmark available to see how this system fares in comparison to others, but if you make it available for CS4, Bill, I will submit the data.
Anyway, here are the results for the time being:
b PassMark 7.0: 4338,1 (only second place due to Vista 64, which adds a 5-10% performance penalty in comparison to XP-32).
b Cinebench R10: 5670 single CPU / 22338 multi CPU / 5154 OpenGL.
b HDTach 3.0.4 long (32 MB): Single disk burst 233 / Avg 99, 2 disk raid0 burst 4275 / Avg 177, 8 disk raid30 burst 1045 / Avg 671.
This is a budget system with i7-920 @ 4.0 GHz, 12 GB RAM, ATI 4870 video, 150 GB boot Velociraptor, 2 TB Raid0 for pagefile/scratch, 2 x single disk 1 TB for audio, stock footage and export, and 8 TB Raid30 for media (Areca-ARC 1680iX-12 with 2 GB cache and BBM) plus 2 BR burners.
Bill, how are you coming along on the PPBM+ CS4 version?Agreed up to a point. The raid controller, cache memory and BBM, which I would have wanted for any system, be it low budget, mid range or high budget, takes out an enormous heap. I could have gotten four i7 CPU's for that. If you add the disks as well, yes, it does get expensive. However, that investment may well outlive several generations of mobo's and CPU's and gives me your much coveted RAID30 array of effectively 6 TB (8 TB raw) and some more.
In the old days, people used to say that the system you wanted is around $ 5K. Nowadays when you want top-of-the-bill $ 5K is not enough; that is IMO a high budget system. A low budget system IMO at least for NLE is somewhere around $ 1-2K and medium is around the $ 2-4K bracket and anything higher than that is top material. That leaves my system in the medium bracket, nice, but not top-of-the-bill. -
How do I remove the icon for file version 4.42.0.0 since it will not even download?
For quite awhile I have successfully used file version 34.0.5 with no issues. Recently, I had an icon the popped up on my desktop for file version 4.42.0.0. I tried to download it, just so it would move to my control panel, so I that I could uninstall it, It will not download. So, then I uninstalled, and reinstalled 34.0.5 to see if that would solve the issue of installing 4.42.0.0, no still nothing. I really don't want or need 4.42.0.0, so how do I get rid of it ?
Sometimes a problem with Firefox may be a result of malware installed on your computer, that you may not be aware of.
You can try these free programs to scan for malware, which work with your existing antivirus software:
* [http://www.microsoft.com/security/scanner/default.aspx Microsoft Safety Scanner]
* [http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwarebytes_free/ MalwareBytes' Anti-Malware]
* [http://support.kaspersky.com/viruses/disinfection/5350 Anti-Rootkit Utility - TDSSKiller]
* [http://general-changelog-team.fr/en/downloads/viewdownload/20-outils-de-xplode/2-adwcleaner AdwCleaner] (for more info, see this [http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/download/adwcleaner/ alternate AdwCleaner download page])
* [http://www.surfright.nl/en/hitmanpro/ Hitman Pro]
* [http://www.eset.com/us/online-scanner/ ESET Online Scanner]
[http://windows.microsoft.com/MSE Microsoft Security Essentials] is a good permanent antivirus for Windows 7/Vista/XP if you don't already have one.
Further information can be found in the [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues caused by malware]] article.
Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
Maybe you are looking for
-
I am running MS Word 2011, latest Mac OS, and trying to use the Mail Merge option with the Apple Address Book as the data source. However whenever I select the Apple Address Book as the data source, I get the error "Word was unable to open the data s
-
This question was posted in response to the following article: http://help.adobe.com/en_US/creativesuite/cs/using/WSBCB2D1F5-98B8-45cc-950A-58E8347FD2F8a .html
-
Allow refresh of individual queries in workbook is not working
Hi, We are in EHP1 SP08, BI Analyzer 7.20 SP2 . In workbook I have 2 queries I checked the "Allow refresh of individual queries" but I am unable to refresh my queries individual . I tried all the options by removing "Process variables on Refresh", "
-
Hello experts Is there any way to make negative posting when Good issue cancellation (VL09)? Paresh Jivani
-
After the latest iTunes update, itunes says it syncs but never removes anything.
Is anyone else seeing this issue. I have match turned off to begin. When I sync it syncs in name only. I remove things off the of either itunes or the iPad2 and it syncs right back. I tell it to remove things and they don't go. It is very frustrating