SBL-ODU-01007 - The HTTP request did not contain a valid SOAPAction header

I am trying to insert a Lead using the following XML
SOAPAction: "document/urn:crmondemand/ws/ecbs/lead/10/2004:LeadInsert"
URL: https://secure-ausomxbia.crmondemand.com/Services/Integration
<env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ns1="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" xmlns:ns2="urn:crmondemand/ws/ecbs/lead/10/2004" xmlns:ns3="urn:/crmondemand/xml/Lead/Data">
<env:Header>
<ns1:Security>
<ns1:UsernameToken>
<ns1:Username>****</ns1:Username>
<ns1:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">****</ns1:Password>
</ns1:UsernameToken>
</ns1:Security>
</env:Header>
<env:Body>
<ns2:LeadInsert_Input>
<ns3:ListOfLead lastpage="true" recordcount="1">
<ns3:Lead>
<ns3:ExternalSystemId>3232323</ns3:ExternalSystemId>
<ns3:LeadFirstName>soap</ns3:LeadFirstName>
<ns3:LeadLastName>test</ns3:LeadLastName>
</ns3:Lead>
</ns3:ListOfLead>
<ns2:Echo>off</ns2:Echo>
</ns2:LeadInsert_Input>
</env:Body>
</env:Envelope>
I am getting following response.
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soap:Body>
<soap:Fault>
<faultcode>soap:Client</faultcode>
<faultstring>Client</faultstring>
<detail>
<ErrorCode>SBL-ODU-01007</ErrorCode>
<ErrorMessage>The HTTP request did not contain a valid SOAPAction header. The value of the header was </ErrorMessage>
</detail>
</soap:Fault>
</soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>
I have checked the URL and SOAPAction seem to be correct, can somebody please let me know what can be the problem.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

SBL-ODU-01008 The HTTP request did not contain well-formed XML.

I am trying to invoke the activity webservice using Msxml2.XMLHTTP.4.0 through PowerBuilder...
I receive the following error when executing the code below: SBL-ODU-01008 The HTTP request did not contain well-formed XML.
ls_post_url = "https://secure-ausomxxxx.crmondemand.com/Services/Integration/Activity;"
ls_response_text = "jsessionid=" + sesId + ";"
ls_post_url = ls_post_url + ls_response_text
     loo_xmlhttp.open ("POST",ls_post_url, false)
// loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Length", 200 )
// loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "text/xml; charset=utf-8" )
// loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Accept", "text/xml" )
// loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("COOKIE", left(cookie,pos(cookie,";",1)-1) )
//     loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("COOKIE", left(cookie,pos(cookie,";",1)-1) )
     ls_post_url2 = "document/urn:crmondemand/ws/ecbs/activity/10/2004:ActivityQueryPage"
     loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("SOAPAction", ls_post_url2)
     loo_xmlhttp.send()
If I uncomment the setRequestHeader info, then I get a different error:
ls_post_url = "https://secure-ausomxxxx.crmondemand.com/Services/Integration/Activity;"
ls_response_text = "jsessionid=" + sesId + ";"
ls_post_url = ls_post_url + ls_response_text
     loo_xmlhttp.open ("POST",ls_post_url, false)
loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Length", 200 )
loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Content-Type", "text/xml; charset=utf-8" )
loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("Accept", "text/xml" )
loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("COOKIE", left(cookie,pos(cookie,";",1)-1) )
     loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("COOKIE", left(cookie,pos(cookie,";",1)-1) )
     ls_post_url2 = "document/urn:crmondemand/ws/ecbs/activity/10/2004:ActivityQueryPage"
     loo_xmlhttp.setRequestHeader("SOAPAction", ls_post_url2)
     loo_xmlhttp.send()
SBL-ODU-01007 The HTTP request did not contain a valid SOAPAction header. The value of the header was
I am unsure what I am missing in order to invoke the web service. If anyone can help I would truly appreciate it.
Thanks

Hi,
I tried the SOAP request you provided and got a different error response:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"><soap:Body><soap:Fault><faultcode>soap:Client</faultcode><faultstring>Client</faultstring><detail><ErrorCode>SBL-ODU-01008</ErrorCode><ErrorMessage>The HTTP request did not contain well-formed XML. An attempt to parse it produced the following error: Unsupported wsse:Password Type. Valid Value: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText</ErrorMessage></detail></soap:Fault></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
After changing the Password Type from:
Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wssusername-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">hijklmno</wsse:Password>
to:
Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">hijklmno</wsse:Password>
The request was successful.
Please let me know if this resolves your issue.
Thanks,
Sean
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='ISO-8859-1'?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
<soapenv:Header>
<wsse:Security
xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd"
soapenv:mustUnderstand="1">
<wsse:UsernameToken>
<wsse:Username>abcdefg</wsse:Username>
<wsse:Password
Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">hijklmno</wsse:Password>
</wsse:UsernameToken>
</wsse:Security>
</soapenv:Header>
<soapenv:Body>
<q0:ContactWS_ContactQueryPage_Input
xmlns:q0="urn:crmondemand/ws/contact/">
<q1:ListOfContact xmlns:q1="urn:crmondemand/xml/Contact/Query">
<Contact>
<ContactType>='Customer'</ContactType>
<ContactFirstName>='Fred'</ContactFirstName>
<IntegrationId />
</Contact>
</q1:ListOfContact>
</q0:ContactWS_ContactQueryPage_Input>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Edited by: Sean Duffy on Jun 4, 2010 9:38 AM

OAS: The request did not specify a valid virtual host.

Hi,
we install the OAS 3.01 on our system (NT 4.0 sr 4 Worstation).
we start the AdminListener with:
oswctl start ADMIN
the listener starts sucessfully.
trying accessing on the ADMIN-Page with the IE 4.0
(http://[IP-adress]:8888)
the following message occured:
The request did not specify a valid virtual host.
any idea ???
Thank
Martin
null

Dennis Bourgeois (guest) wrote:
: Peter Siket (guest) wrote:
: : Martin Behrmann (guest) wrote:
: : : Hi,
: : : we install the OAS 3.01 on our system (NT 4.0 sr 4
: Worstation).
: : : we start the AdminListener with:
: : : oswctl start ADMIN
: : : the listener starts sucessfully.
: : : trying accessing on the ADMIN-Page with the IE 4.0
: : : (http://[IP-adress]:8888)
: : : the following message occured:
: : : The request did not specify a valid virtual host.
: : : any idea ???
: : : Thank
: : : Martin
: : Hi Martin,
: : we learned that OAS 3.01 only accepts hostnames. The only
way
: to
: : enable communication is to supply a hosts-file with the
: : appropriate entry. I don't know why but so it works.
: : Peter
: Martin,
: I'm running OAS 4.0.8 but here is a thought... In 4.0.8 if you
go
: to the network properties for your listner and add the IP
address
: there then it works. I also found that if you are using
: something like a Cisco domain controller to do load balancing
: you
: will want to list the IP address of the Domain Controler in
there
: as well.
: Dennis
If you access using the hostname, this will be passed onto the
Application Server in addition to the IP address. The
Application Server will use the hostname details to determine
the listener files to use under the $ORACLE_HOME/ows path. This
means you can more than one set of OAS files and therefore in
theory service two different hostname addresses mapped to the
same IP address.
Nigel.
null

The MAC signature found in the HTTP request '***' is not the same as any computed signature. Server used following string to sign: 'POST

Hi,
When trying with Postman sending a REST call to Azure Storage Queues I get:
The MAC signature found in the HTTP request '***' is not the same as any computed signature. Server used following string to sign: 'POST.
The code I have for creating the Authorization Header:
var accountName = "my_account";
string key = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["my_access_key"];
DateTime dt = DateTime.Now;
string formattedDate = String.Format("{0:r}", dt);
var canonicalizedHeaders = "x-ms-date:" + formattedDate + "\n" + "x-ms-version:2009-09-19" + "\n" ;
var canonicalizedResource = "/my_account/myqueue/messages";
var stringToSign = String.Format("POST,\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n{0}{1}", canonicalizedHeaders, canonicalizedResource);
stringToSign = HttpUtility.UrlEncode(stringToSign);
HMACSHA256 hmac = new HMACSHA256(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(key));
var signature = Convert.ToBase64String(hmac.ComputeHash(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(stringToSign)));
var authorizationHeader = String.Format(CultureInfo.InvariantCulture, "SharedKey {0}:{1}", accountName, signature);
return authorizationHeader;
Anyone any idea what I'm missing/doing wrong?
Additional question: do i have to create for every message I want to send a new Authorization header? Or is there an option (as with Service Bus Topics) to create a header that can be used for a certain timeframe?
Thanks.

One issue is with this line of code:
HMACSHA256 hmac = new HMACSHA256(Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(key));
Please use the following:
HMACSHA256 hmac = new HMACSHA256(Convert.FromBase64String(key));
and that should take care of the problem.
Regarding your question, "do i have to create for every message I want to send a new Authorization header? Or is there an option (as with Service Bus Topics) to create a header that can be used for a certain timeframe?"
With your current approach, the answer is yes. What you can do is create a Shared Access Signature on the queue which will be valid for certain duration and then use that for posting messages to a queue using simple HttpWebRequest/HttpWebResponse.
Hope this helps.

The RADIUS request did not match any configured connection request policy (CRP)

I setup NPS server and added a RADIUS Client access point, my project is to get a wireless user to authenticate using his/her AD credientials, my problem is i can't seem to authenticate my user
my NPS server is giving me this error log under Event Viewer > Server Logs > Network Policy and Access Services
    Reason:                The RADIUS request did not match any configured connection request policy (CRP).
but from my understanding i don't need to setup Connection Request Policies because i am using Network Policy
Please Help!

thanks for your reply, i setup a new NPS policy here is my error log
Network Policy Server denied access to a user.
Contact the Network Policy Server administrator for more information.
User:
    Security ID:            NULL SID
    Account Name:            csdomain\rsingh
    Account Domain:            csdomain
    Fully Qualified Account Name:    csdomain\rsingh
Client Machine:
    Security ID:            NULL SID
    Account Name:            -
    Fully Qualified Account Name:    -
    OS-Version:            -
    Called Station Identifier:        0026.992f.6761
    Calling Station Identifier:        2477.0392.b0f8
NAS:
    NAS IPv4 Address:        192.50.2.2
    NAS IPv6 Address:        -
    NAS Identifier:            MYWAP
    NAS Port-Type:            Wireless - IEEE 802.11
    NAS Port:            35290
RADIUS Client:
    Client Friendly Name:        MYWAP
    Client IP Address:            192.50.2.2
Authentication Details:
    Connection Request Policy Name:    PEAP
    Network Policy Name:        -
    Authentication Provider:        Windows
    Authentication Server:        MYSERVER.csdomain.com
    Authentication Type:        EAP
    EAP Type:            -
    Account Session Identifier:        -
    Logging Results:            Accounting information was written to the local log file.
    Reason Code:            22
    Reason:                The client could not be authenticated because the Extensible Authentication Protocol (EAP) Type cannot be processed by the server.

The configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML - When using Office 2013 ODT package

All,
I'm experiencing an issue where when using the Office 2013 package pulled down from ODT, that if I try to change the locations of either InfoPath Filler 2013 or Publisher 2013 from the default of Microsoft Office 2013 then I receive the message "The
configuration file did not contain well formed AppV configuration XML. Please check the management server event log for more information". If I check Applications and Services\Microsoft\AppV\Server-Management\Admin the error displayed there is "An
error was encountered parsing dynamic configuration file '0'. However I am able to change the shortcut location for all other applications except the above 2. I've tried redownloading the files using the ODT and also changing the version number (so far I've
tried both the 15.0.4631.1002 and 15.0.4659.1001 with the same result).
As all I'm interested in so far is having a package which contains Visio and Project I've tried following the article to exclude all the other Office elements:
http://technet.microsoft.com/library/jj219426(v=office.15).aspx#BKMK_ExcludeAppElement. However the package looks to be the same and when I load it into the management console all the options and elements to Office 2013 are available like they were before
when I hadn't set the exclude tags so I'm not sure whether the ExcludeApp parameters actually work correctly.
This then brings me onto the 3rd issue I've experienced. I have a group for the Visio users and I've set custom security for them to have Visio delivered to them but not Project and then a seperate group for just Project users who will have Project delivered
to them but not have Visio. When testing this sometimes seems to work but other times it seems to trip out and a user just in the Project or Visio group will get all of the Office 2013 applications and under the default location of Microsoft Office 2013. When
trying to spot correlation with this it appears random and can happen to any user on any device. We have sequenced a few applications ourselves where different parts are needed for different users and we have successfully managed this using different security
groups for different applications, just as I'm trying here with Office 2013.
Has anyone else experienced the issue with the "did not contain well formed XML" as at the start of the post and how were you able to resolve this? Also has anyone any advice on how to troubleshoot the issue with the security seeming to trip out
and publish all applications within a package to a user regardless of whether they are in the correct group or not?
The management / publishing servers are 5.0.1224.0 which is SP1 HF4 and the clients are on SP2 HF5.
Thanks

Nicke,
The config files are UTF-8. I did find the same article as yourself, however when searching for the value ‘TakeoverExtensionPointsFrom46=’ within either of the configuration.xml files that text isn’t found.
No sinister reason not to share the file used, just it’s the same structure as referenced in the article:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn745895(v=office.15).aspx. The only difference being that I’m using ProPlusVolume and I’ve set a version number (which is the October
2014 update). I’ve even looked to follow the above example as closely as possible in just using the ExcludeApp ID of Access and InfoPath, just to try and prove the process. However I still get the usual full package. The version of the Click-to-Run setup.exe
I’m using is 15.0.4623.1001, so later than the version specified at the end of that article which is 15.0.4619.1000. Where can I expect to see the elements excluded? Will it be when loading the package into the management console or would it just not appear
on the machine when delivered?
<Configuration>
<Add SourcePath="C:\OfficeDeploymentToolV2" Version="15.0.4659.1001" OfficeClientEdition="32">
    <Product ID="ProPlusVolume">
      <Language ID="en-us" />
<ExcludeApp ID="Access" />
<ExcludeApp ID="InfoPath" />
    </Product>
</Add>
</Configuration>
3). We’ve not used global publishing in our environment yet so I will try that. I’ve set both GlobalRefreshEnabled and GlobalRefreshOnLogon to True and when using the command Get-AppvPublishingServer on the client I’m testing with I can see this is pulled
through correctly. I’ve also added the client name to the AD group used to grant access to the package and it is published. However nothing is pulling through onto the Client, so are there any steps I’ve missed or misinterpreted when looking to set this up?
I guess the global publishing is there to keep in with licensing for Office being per device? On a slight aside, as Windows licensing is being changed to allow per user licensing
http://www.zdnet.com/microsoft-to-make-per-user-windows-licensing-available-to-enterprise-customers-7000035401/ does anyone know if there are any plans to allow for Office / Project / Visio licenses to go per user as well? We’re a volume license customer
rather than subscription based so I think a lot of the options to selectively deploy Visio and Project are excluded for us.
Dan,
Ok that explains why the security could be tripping out then and leading to this result. As above I’ll try with global publishing and see how I get on.
From what I’ve read / watched I think only one Office 2013 package can be published to a machine, so we would be unable to have a separate package for Visio and a separate package for Project and then attempt to deliver
them both together. If a user wanted both Project and Visio then I guess we’d need to have a combined Project and Visio package to cover than scenario, but then 2 more separate Project and Visio packages for those who would only want either Project and Visio
(I think).
The scenario we’re looking at is to see whether we are able to deliver Project and / or Visio to different users through an AppV package and this will then cover users on XenApp or on fat clients. Only a small proportion of our
users will need access to Project and / or Visio so therefore we’d only have a small amount of Project and Visio licenses.
However from what I’ve tested up to this point and from what I’ve picked up from Forum posts / watched on TechEd sessions is that as publishing is Global and is unable to use different security groups for different elements of the
suite, then using Office through AppV is only suitable if you will be delivering the whole suite (including Project and Visio) to all of your users. So in a scenario where you’d only want certain elements to be delivered to a handful of users then you’d need
to keep with traditional ESD methods to have this installed onto fat clients and steer clear of XenApp. If wanting to install to XenApp then a lockdown tool like AppSense or AppLocker would also need to be brought into the equation.
Is my understanding above correct or have I missed some options / methods?
If the full Office package is always delivered but a company only has Office licenses and no Project and Visio licenses for all its users, how do they stop Project and Visio being delivered and being available? Or again if you have
this use case is the AppV method one which will be unsuitable?
Thanks

The enrollment server did not provision a valid identity certificate

I'm working on rolling my own MDM service, and I'm trying to combine the SCEP and MDM payloads as the MDM protocol document from Apple suggests. I created my own SCEP web service in C# .Net and I know that the device can get a valid certificate when I just send the SCEP payload. However when I also include an MDM payload that points to the SCEP payload's UUID via the IdentityCertificateUUID key, I get the following error, "The enrollment server did not provision a valid identity certificate." This configuration is the one that is sent after the user chooses to install the initial enrollment configuration (step 1 of phase 2 in this diagram).
The device doesn't appear to even make an attempt at connecting to my server, and thanks to server side logging I know that it never reaches my SCEP web service page. This seems to indicate that there's something wrong with the certificate I use to sign the payload. I've separately tried signing it with my SSL certificate (from a pre trusted root authority), my customer MDM push certificate (chained from our vendor cert), and my self-signed root certificate authority certificate (created via makecert.exe) that the SCEP service uses to issue new certificates (i.e. device identity certificates).
I've looked at the output from the iPCU (iPhone Configuration Utility) when I create a profile with both the MDM and SCEP payloads, and it isn't a valid profile (I've even tried copying it nearly wholesale). However when I install the profile via the iPCU the error doesn't come up and it begins the SCEP enrollment process without issue.
A side note - using a preexisting MDM vendor is not an option here.
Below is the profile I'm using:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
      <plist version="1.0">
        <dict>
          <key>PayloadContent</key>
          <array>
            <dict>
              <key>PayloadContent</key>
              <dict>
                <key>Challenge</key>
                <string>this is a challenge</string>
                <key>Key Type</key>
                <string>RSA</string>
                <key>Key Usage</key>
                <integer>5</integer>
                <key>Keysize</key>
                <integer>1024</integer>
                <key>Name</key>
                <string>mycompany</string>
                <key>Retries</key>
                <integer>3</integer>
                <key>RetryDelay</key>
                <integer>0</integer>
                <key>Subject</key>
                <array><array><array>
                  <string>CN</string>
                  <string>mycompany</string>
                </array></array></array>
                <key>URL</key>
                <string>https://mysite.com/scep.aspx</string>
              </dict>
              <key>PayloadDescription</key>
              <string>Configures SCEP</string>
              <key>PayloadDisplayName</key>
              <string>SCEP (mycompany)</string>
              <key>PayloadIdentifier</key>
              <string>com.mycompany.mdm.scep1</string>
              <key>PayloadOrganization</key>
              <string></string>
              <key>PayloadType</key>
              <string>com.apple.security.scep</string>
              <key>PayloadUUID</key>
              <string>57225d3d-0758-4d23-8093-e4d8c9bbd47c</string>
              <key>PayloadVersion</key>
              <integer>1</integer>
            </dict>
            <dict>
              <key>AccessRights</key>
              <integer>3</integer>
              <key>CheckInURL</key>
              <string>mysite.com/checkin.aspx</string>
              <key>CheckOutWhenRemoved</key>
              <false/>
              <key>IdentityCertificateUUID</key>
              <string>57225d3d-0758-4d23-8093-e4d8c9bbd47c</string>
              <key>PayloadDescription</key>
              <string>Configures MobileDeviceManagement.</string>
              <key>PayloadIdentifier</key>
              <string>com.mycompany.mdm.mdm2</string>
              <key>PayloadOrganization</key>
              <string></string>
              <key>PayloadType</key>
              <string>com.apple.mdm</string>
              <key>PayloadUUID</key>
              <string>ed0ae41d-1aa7-4721-9fe9-139c1072132c</string>
              <key>PayloadVersion</key>
              <integer>1</integer>
              <key>ServerURL</key>
              <string>https://mysite.com/checkin.aspx</string>
              <key>SignMessage</key>
              <false/>
              <key>Topic</key>
              <string>com.apple.mgmt.mypushsubject</string>
              <key>UseDevelopmentAPNS</key>
              <true/>
            </dict>
          </array>
          <key>PayloadDescription</key>
          <string>Profile description.</string>
          <key>PayloadDisplayName</key>
          <string>Test Profile</string>
          <key>PayloadIdentifier</key>
          <string>com.mycompany.mdm</string>
          <key>PayloadOrganization</key>
          <string>mycompany</string>
          <key>PayloadRemovalDisallowed</key>
          <false/>
          <key>PayloadType</key>
          <string>Configuration</string>
          <key>PayloadUUID</key>
          <string>13321058-4037-478c-9b1e-ef6f810065cb</string>
          <key>PayloadVersion</key>
          <integer>1</integer>
        </dict>
      </plist>

I got in touch with Apple about this.
Apparently you want to send the combined MDM & SCEP payload in step 2 of phase 3 of the diagram I linked in my question, which is the profile that's sent after OTA enrollment. According to Apple you need two separate certificates (which means two SCEP enrollments) - one for OTA enrollment, and one for MDM enrollment.

Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature in flex 4

As part of our CI build, the ant script that builds the client side (flex 4) projects also runs a set of FlexUnit4 tests on the deployed project. Most of the tests work but a few fail with this error
RSL
http://local.foo.com/bar/com/blah/components/someComponent/framework_4.1.0.16076.swz failed to load.
Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
The build machine is running Ununtu 10.10 with Firefox 3.6 and Flashplayer 10.2. If I run the exact same set of tasks, accessed from the same URL in windows everything passes with no problem. After some searching I did run across this thread: http://forums.adobe.com/message/2747415#2747415 but when I went looking for the libflashsupport.so file mentioned, the Ubuntu docs seemed to indicate that it was no longer needed.
I'm at my wits end here. Is libflashsupport.so actually needed in Ubuntu 10.10 and if so where would I find it? If not does anyone know of another issue that could be responsible for this?

hello,
I have the same issue, Ubuntu 10.10, flashplayer 10.3rc1
mxmlc SimplePrj.mxml -debug=true -benchmark=true --target-player=10 -output ../deploy/SimplePrj.swf
mxlc verbose:
Loading configuration file /home/.../flex-config.xml
Initial setup: 79ms
start loading swcs 9ms Running Total: 88ms
Loaded 34 SWCs: 740ms
precompile: 1062ms
Required RSLs:
    http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/framework_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
    http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/tlf/2.0.0.232/textLayout_2.0.0.232.swz with 1 failover.
    http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/spark_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
    http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/sparkskins_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
    http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.0.20967/mx_4.5.0.20967.swz with 1 failover.
Files: 540 Time: 3380ms
Linking... 27ms
SWF Encoding... 18ms
/.../SimplePrj/deploy/SimplePrj.swf (80059 bytes)
postcompile: 45ms
Total time: 4259ms
Peak memory usage: 81 MB (Heap: 62, Non-Heap: 19)
I had to copy the swz to deploy folder since failovers are not yet available.
* accessing from windows machines it loads swz without complaints.
Jaco

Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.

I have three different applications which suddenly stopped working with this error
Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
None of the sites has been touched in Months, I assumed they would keep working the way they had.
I wonder how many other sites are experiencing this and how many PO'd customers there are out there??
This is really bad business practice, what is causing it?
Dan Pride
Note: the three were developed around the same time, one domain went down for a few days and was then renewed????

Daniel... have you found a solution to your problem?
I am also having the same problem. I was googling with no avail, when I noticed you added this post just yesterday,
so I am thinking that adobe has done something to the swz files hosted on thier servers.
Can someone from Adobe confirm if anything was done to either swz files or the crossdomain files on their end?
I am in the same boat as you... no changes on our side, but the application has suddenly stopped working.
We were building against a beta build of flex 4 (4.0.0.10485)
I wonder which sdk version you are using?
Here is what I see through the debugger...
Warning: Ignoring 'secure' attribute in policy file from http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/crossdomain.xml. The 'secure' attribute is only permitted in HTTPS and socket policy files. See http://www.adobe.com/go/strict_policy_files for details.
[SWF] C:\Inetpub\wwwdata\xxxxxxxxx_Application.swf - 847,661 bytes after decompression
Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
Failed to load RSL http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.0.0.10485/framework_4.0.0.10485.swz
Failing over to RSL framework_4.0.0.10485.swz
Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature.
PS... I have tried multple PCs (XP, Vista, Server 2008) with different versions of flash player (10.0.45.2, 10.0.22.87)
Any help appreciated.

Anyone know what is Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature

can anyone help me solve this issue? when i try to run project or make swf file
Error #2046: The loaded file did not have a valid signature
show up. how do i get a valid signature? or it show up because it is a trial version?
please help me!!

Hi Ryan,
Please see this recent post: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3277736#3277736
Your best option is to open your project in the shipping version of Flash Catalyst CS5 and re-publish it. Catalyst CS5 can open projects that were created with the beta 2 release (October 2009) or newer.
If your project won't open, then it was probably created in an earlier beta/alpha version of Catalyst. If you know how to write Flex code, with some work you can upgrade these old projects by hand: import the project into Flash Builder 4 and then resolve any problems you encounter with compiling and running the project.
Sorry for the trouble -- hope this info helps,
- Peter

HTTP response does not contain a valid XML root tag

I am running into an error in my trace portion of my XML when executing my application. The error is "HTTP response does not contain a valid XML root tag". The HTTP request is successful with message 200 so it seems to be accepted by the Integration Engine. I looked for other posts on this error and only found one and it didn't show the resolution. Any help would be appreciated.

Hello
Check these notes (do you use a split mapping?):
1) 1515230 XI mapping: "Root tag missing" in split mapping
2) 1640553 XI mapping: Split mapping: error Missing_Interface
Regards
Mark

SCCM 2012 - Adding Operating System Installer (The specified path does not contain a valid operating system ..)

I have encountered the dreaded "The specified path does not contain a valid operating system or you do not have permission to access it. Specify a valid path" message that seems to be popular in many forums .... BUT, so far none of the "solutions"
have fixed the problem (of I don't understand the fix)
Configuration
SCCM 2012 SP1 5.0.7804.1000
WADK 8.100.26629.0 < Suggested Fix
Server 2008 R2
SCCM Administrator with UserID = SCCMAdmin
Steps / Fixes I have followed
I have configured a administrative share
\\caleb\sources$ to hold directories (such as Apps, Drivers, and OS) with the following NTFS Permissions
EVERYONE has Read and Execute, List folder, Read permissions<o:p></o:p>
SYSTEM has Full Control
<Suggested Fix
SCCMManagers (our group that has all SCCMManagers) has Full Control<o:p></o:p>
SCCMAdmin (the SCCM Admin account that we are using to import image) has Full Control<o:p></o:p>
Local Administrators (the local machine administrator) has Full Control
<Suggested Fix
<o:p></o:p>
Another Fix is to explicitly grant all permissions to the SCCM Administrator
<Suggested Fix
>Administrative Users ...
Properties of the SCCM Administrator (for us that is SCCMAdmin) has all the boxes checked<o:p></o:p>
Another suggestion I was able to glean was to Specify the Network Access Account
so I configured SCCMAdmin as the Network Access Account.
Another potential fix is that the image ISO file that has been downloaded is corrupt.   So, I downloaded the Win 7 (and Win 8.1) ISO's from MSDN and did a Checksum check.
I then mounted the ISO (on 2008R2 I use VirtualClone Drive) and copied the contents of the image to
E:\Sources\OS\en_windows_7_professional_with_sp1_vl_build_x86_dvd_u_677896 for Windows 7 with SP1
To double check,
I computed the Hash on the Install.WIM located in the Sources directory and compared with
the computed Has Tag for the Install.WIM on the ISO Image ... and the Hash tag of the WIM's matched (extracted vs what is contained within the ISO)<o:p></o:p>
I tried to load the images into SCCM 2012 using the "Operating System Installers" option
UNC to installer
\\caleb\sources$\OS\en_windows_7_professional_with_sp1_vl_build_x86_dvd_u_677896
Then I receive the lovely message <o:p></o:p>
"The specified path does not contain a valid operating system or you do not have permission to access it. Specify a valid path"<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
From
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft Configuration
Manager\AdminConsole\AdminUILog\SmsAdminUI.log<o:p></o:p>
<o:p> </o:p>
\r\nSystem.Management.ManagementException\r\nGeneric failure \r\n
at System.Management.ManagementException.ThrowWithExtendedInfo(ManagementStatus
errorCode)
   at System.Management.ManagementObject.InvokeMethod(String
methodName, ManagementBaseObject inParameters, InvokeMethodOptions options)
   at
Microsoft.ConfigurationManagement.ManagementProvider.WqlQueryEngine.WqlConnectionManager.ExecuteMethod(String
methodClass, String methodName, Dictionary`2 methodParameters, Boolean
traceParameters)\r\nManagementException details:
instance of SMS_ExtendedStatus
Description = "Failed to get the image property from the source WIM
file due to error 80070002";
ErrorCode = 2147942402;
File ="e:\\nts_sccm_release\\sms\\siteserver\\sdk_provider\\smsprov\\sspimagepackage.cpp";
Line = 586;
Operation = "ExecMethod";
ParameterInfo = "SMS_OperatingSystemInstallPackage";
ProviderName = "WinMgmt";
StatusCode = 2147749889;
\r\n<o:p></o:p>
What am I missing ???? I assume something simple but, darn I'm stumped!!!

Hi,
Configuration Manager version
Windows AIK or Windows ADK Version
Windows PE versions for boot images customizable from the Configuration Manager console
Supported Windows PE versions for boot images not customizable from the Configuration Manager console
System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with no service pack
Windows AIK for Windows 7
Windows PE 3
None
System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with SP1
Windows ADK for Windows 8
Windows PE 4
None
System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with SP1 and cumulative update 2
Windows ADK for Windows 8
Windows PE 4
Windows PE 3.11
System Center 2012 Configuration Manager with SP1 and cumulative update 3
Windows ADK for Windows 8
Windows PE 4
Windows PE 3.11 and Windows PE 5
System Center 2012 R2 Configuration Manager
Windows ADK for Windows 8.1
Windows PE 5
Windows PE 3.11
Please try to install the Windows ADK for Windows 8.
http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=30652
For more information, please review the link below:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg682187.aspx
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

The extension does not contain a valid signature

hey guys, newbie on deck!
So, after installing CS6 I ran the Adobe Update Manger. During the update the Adobe Extension Manager (AEM) fired off and began updating as well. One error I saw was:
The extension 'Adobe_Flash_Professional_Toolkit_for_CreateJS' does not contain a valid signature. The extension will not be installed.
I'm not sure what this is or what it does but I would like to:
Understand the Adobe ecosystem and
Clear any problems.
Here's what I do know:
The Mac I have is 2 days old and probably in the best shape of its life.
I installed CS6 fresh from a DVD.
Ran the Adobe Update Manager the next day (today).
I don't intend to use Flash.
If anyone can expain common causes for this behavior and a fix I would greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance,
TT

Hi JesusPresley,
The root cause is the updater updated Adobe Flash, which tried to install the extension above by Extension Manager in the installation. However, this extension was NOT signed with the updated Adobe certificate, so the extension installation will be rejected by Extension Manager. That is what you got. We have sent this issue to Flash team.
If you don't use Flash, you can manually edit C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Flash CS6\XManConfig.xml, and remove the line <Data key="SupportedInSuite">CS6</Data>. Thanks.
Xiaoyi

Autoscaling Application block for Azure worker role console app not working. Get error as The HTTP request was forbidden with client authentication

I have written a console application to test the WASABi(AutoScaling Application Block) for my worker role running in azure. The worker role processes the messages in the queue and I want to scale-up based on the queue length. I have configured and set the
constraints and reactive rules properly. I get the following error when I run this application.
[BEGIN DATA]{}
DateTime=2013-12-11T21:30:02.5731267Z
Autoscaling General Verbose: 1002 : Rule match.
[BEGIN DATA]{"EvaluationId":"4f9f7cb0-fc0d-4276-826f-b6a5f3ea6801","MatchingRules":[{"RuleName":"default","RuleDescription":"The default constraint rule","Targets":["AutoscalingWebRole","AutoscalingWorkerRole"]},{"RuleName":"ScaleUpOnHighWebRole","RuleDescription":"Scale
up the web role","Targets":[]},{"RuleName":"ScaleDownOnLowWebRole","RuleDescription":"Scale down the web role","Targets":[]},{"RuleName":"ScaleUpOnHighWorkerRole","RuleDescription":"Scale
up the worker role","Targets":[]},{"RuleName":"ScaleDownOnLowWorkerRole","RuleDescription":"Scale down the worker role","Targets":[]},{"RuleName":"ScaleUpOnQueueMessages","RuleDescription":"Scale
up the web role","Targets":[]},{"RuleName":"ScaleDownOnQueueMessages","RuleDescription":"Scale down the web role","Targets":[]}]}
DateTime=2013-12-11T21:31:03.7516260Z
Autoscaling General Warning: 1004 : Undefined target.
[BEGIN DATA]{"EvaluationId":"4f9f7cb0-fc0d-4276-826f-b6a5f3ea6801","TargetName":"AutoscalingWebRole"}
DateTime=2013-12-11T21:31:03.7516260Z
Autoscaling Updates Verbose: 3001 : The current deployment configuration for a hosted service is about to be checked to determine if a change is required (for role scaling or changes to settings).
[BEGIN DATA]{"EvaluationId":"4f9f7cb0-fc0d-4276-826f-b6a5f3ea6801","HostedServiceDetails":{"Subscription":"psicloud","HostedService":"rmsazure","DeploymentSlot":"Staging"},"ScaleRequests":{"AutoscalingWorkerRole":{"Min":1,"Max":2,"AbsoluteDelta":0,"RelativeDelta":0,"MatchingRules":"default"}},"SettingChangeRequests":{}}
DateTime=2013-12-11T21:31:03.7516260Z
Autoscaling Updates Error: 3010 : Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.WindowsAzure.Autoscaling.ServiceManagement.ServiceManagementClientException: The service configuration could not be retrieved from Windows Azure for hosted service with DNS prefix 'rmsazure'
in subscription id 'af1e96ad-43aa-4d05-b3f1-0c9d752e6cbb' and deployment slot 'Staging'. ---> System.ServiceModel.Security.MessageSecurityException: The HTTP request was forbidden with client authentication scheme 'Anonymous'. ---> System.Net.WebException:
The remote server returned an error: (403) Forbidden.
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetResponse()
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory`1.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout)
--- End of inner exception stack trace ---
Server stack trace:
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ValidateAuthentication(HttpWebRequest request, HttpWebResponse response, WebException responseException, HttpChannelFactory`1 factory)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelUtilities.ValidateRequestReplyResponse(HttpWebRequest request, HttpWebResponse response, HttpChannelFactory`1 factory, WebException responseException, ChannelBinding channelBinding)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.HttpChannelFactory`1.HttpRequestChannel.HttpChannelRequest.WaitForReply(TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.RequestChannel.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Dispatcher.RequestChannelBinder.Request(Message message, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs, TimeSpan timeout)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.Call(String action, Boolean oneway, ProxyOperationRuntime operation, Object[] ins, Object[] outs)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.InvokeService(IMethodCallMessage methodCall, ProxyOperationRuntime operation)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannelProxy.Invoke(IMessage message)
If anyone know why I am getting this anonymous access violation error. My webrole is secured site but worker role not.
I appreciate any help.
Thanks,
ravi

Hello,
>>: The service configuration could not be retrieved from Windows Azure for hosted service with DNS prefix 'rmsazure' in subscription id **************
Base on error message, I guess your azure service didn't get your certificate and other instances didn't have certificate to auto scale. Please check your upload the certificate on your portal management. Also, you could refer to same thread via link(
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/12843401/azure-autoscaling-block-cannot-find-certificate ).
Hope it helps.
Any question or result, please let me know.
Thanks
Regards,
Will
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

When attempt to download 10.5, receive message: "...problem with this widows installer package. a program run as part of the set up did not finish as expected. ..." -- what to do?

I have attempted to upgrade my iPad which is necessar to downloan an app I want (My Radar). The iTunes on my computer will not process the upgrade of 10.5 without message: "There is a problem with this Windows Installer Package. A program run as part of the set up did not finish as expected. Contract your support personnel or packae vendor." ..... Little old lady needs help, my iTunes "appears to be 10.5 on my PC; however, will not upgrade my iPad. I have BitDefender as the "protector" on my PC if that is the issue.

Go to support.microsoft.com/fixit
In section 2 click on: Install or upgrade software or hardware
Then click on the title in section 3: Fix problems with programs that cannot be installed or uninstall
This link may get you there: http://support.microsoft.com/mats/Program_Install_and_Uninstall/
Let it run and then try to download it again

SBL-ODU-01007 - The HTTP request did not contain a valid SOAPAction header

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for