Schema name added to SQL query after SQL Command

Post Author: rickeb1
CA Forum: Data Connectivity and SQL
Hello,
I am using Crystal Reports XI. I have created a Crystal report in the usual manner using a set of tables from a given database schema. When I look at the SQL query that Crystal generates, there are no data schema qualifiers anywhere.
Then I added an SQL Command object that I use as an additional table. Now when I look at the generated SQL query, the data schema name is added to the beginning of the original query as well as to the new SQL Comand code. It also creates an EXTERNAL JOIN which uses this hard-coded schema name (not exactly sure what an "external join" is).
This hard-coding of the schema name is causing a problem when we try to migrate the report to a different environment. Is there some way to avoid having Crystal generate a query with the schema name imbedded in the query, or is there a way to remove it after it is generated?
Thanks!

Post Author: rickeb1
CA Forum: Data Connectivity and SQL
Actually, our problem may be related to this:
http://boardreader.com/t/Crystal_XI_249231/The_Show_SQL_Query_SQL_command_changes_89667.html
Any help greatly (and desparately) apapreciated!

Similar Messages

Sum of the sql query after a control break

Hi all,
I need some help about getting the final sum of the sql query after doing a control break in a dynamic report, ( the control break make me the sum of each report but didn't leave me the sum of all the query)
Thanks in andvance for your help !!
Eric

Have a look at the text_io package:
http://www.oracle.com/webapps/online-help/forms/10g/state?navSetId=_&navId=3&vtTopicFile=f1_help/oraini/c_text_io.html&vtTopicId=
cheers

How to make sure that schema name is not included with generated sqls

How to make sure that schema name is not included with generated sqls with tableadapter wizard.
What should I use? Oledb, ODT.NET, where can set that I want "pure" sqls, not schemas, not ", or anything like this
I want
"Select a,b from t1" ,not "select "a","b" from schema.t1"
Also schema name is put in all parameters, all over the place... What if schema name changes. (b1test to b1prod)
. I now manually edit XML files of dataset. It works but....
thanks

The full hardware :
Processor Intel core due 3.00 MHz
RAM:1.5GB
psu:650 Watt (but i baught i cheap one so it may be actually about 400 watt)
HD Disk:160 GB
But about the power supply if it not able to run the VGA card ,Is it will not show any screen or it will not able to run the computer??

SQL Query(PL/SQL Function Returning SQL Query)

I am trying to write a dynamic report using SQL Query(PL/SQL Function Returning SQL Query).
I can get the report to run but I need to concatinate some columns into one, seperated by a comma or a dash.
I have tried select *****||','||***** alias
also select *****||'-'||***** alias
but I always get an error.
Is there a way of doing this please
Gus

This is my full query
declare
v_query varchar2(4000);
begin
if :P63_TRAN_INFO = 2 THEN
v_query := 'select
     A.FILENR,
     A.EXERCISENAME,
A.STARTDATE,
A.ENDDATE,
     A.UNIT,
A.ACCADDRESSES, B.ADDRESS, B.ADDRESS_1, B.POST_CODE, B.TOWN,
     A.EXERCISEAREAS,
     A.TOTALVEHICLES,
A.TOTALTROOPS+A.RNTOTALTROOPS+A.RAFTOTALTROOPS TOTALTROOPS,
A.CAR, A.MINIBUS, A.HGV,
A.NAMERANK, A.ADDRESS, A.ADDRESSI, A.ADDRESSII, A.POSTCODE,
A.TRANSIT,
A.INFOONLY
from     BFLOG_AT A, BFLOG_ACCADDRESS B
WHERE A.ACCADDRESSES = B.NAME
AND A.STARTDATE >= :P63_START_DATE
AND A.ENDDATE <= :P63_END_DATE
AND A.AUTHORISED = 1
AND A.INFOONLY = 1' ;
END IF;
RETURN v_query;
END;
This query runs ok, but if I try changing it to the code below with fields concatinated, then it fails
declare
v_query varchar2(4000);
begin
if :P63_TRAN_INFO = 2 THEN
v_query := 'select
     A.FILENR,
     A.EXERCISENAME,
A.STARTDATE,
A.ENDDATE,
     A.UNIT,
A.ACCADDRESSES||','||B.ADDRESS||','||B.ADDRESS_1||','||B.POST_CODE||','||B.TOWN ADDRESS,
     A.EXERCISEAREAS,
     A.TOTALVEHICLES,
A.TOTALTROOPS+A.RNTOTALTROOPS+A.RAFTOTALTROOPS TOTALTROOPS,
A.CAR, A.MINIBUS, A.HGV,
A.NAMERANK, A.ADDRESS, A.ADDRESSI, A.ADDRESSII, A.POSTCODE,
A.TRANSIT,
A.INFOONLY
from     BFLOG_AT A, BFLOG_ACCADDRESS B
WHERE A.ACCADDRESSES = B.NAME
AND A.STARTDATE >= :P63_START_DATE
AND A.ENDDATE <= :P63_END_DATE
--AND (A.EXERCISEAREAS LIKE "GAP, OA, OAL")
--OR (A.EXERCISEAREAS LIKE "Harz")
AND A.AUTHORISED = 1
AND A.INFOONLY = 1' ;
END IF;
RETURN v_query;
END;
Cheers
Gus

SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query) when using to_char

we are trying to build a report page of Type SQL Query (PL/SQL function body returning SQL query).
our query is so simple, we need to extract the month from the recording_date column.
declare
l_query varchar2(1000);
begin
l_query:='select to_char(recording_date,'MM')from re_productive';
return l_query;
end;
but we are having the following problem for this query
Function returning SQL query: Query cannot be parsed within the Builder. If you believe your query is syntactically correct, check the generic columns checkbox below the region source to proceed without parsing.
(ORA-06550: line 4, column 42: PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol "MON" when expecting one of the following: . ( * @ % & = - + ; < / > at in is mod remainder not rem <> or != or ~= >= <= <> and or like between || multiset member SUBMULTISET_ The symbol ". was inserted before "MON" to continue.)
Notes:
1-the query is correct and it was tested under Toad and SQL Plus.
2- we tried Use Generic Column Names (parse query at runtime only) option but we get the same problem.
any quick help please.

Hi
You haven't escaped your quotes in the string. Try this...
DECLARE
l_query VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
l_query:= 'select to_char(recording_date,''MM'') from re_productive';
RETURN l_query;
END;Cheers
Ben

Sql query(PL/SQL function body return SQL query) with in(x,y,z) condition

Hello,
I've set up a region definition of type "SQL Query(PL/SQL function body return SQL query). In my query I make use of an "in" condition. When I populate :P755_INC_BARG_UNIT with a value of 0F (no quotes), I get the correct count. However, when I set :P755_INC_BARG_UNIT to 0F, 0E I get an invalid count. What do I have to set the page item to?
When running the query in TOAD, and setting :P755_INC_BARG_UNIT to the string inside the brackets (0F, 0E) I get the proper count.
The code I use is shown below. Any help would be appreciated,
Alex.
DECLARE
v_sql VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
SELECT count(*) "cnts",
''Faculty data file IDs missing in appt table'' "err_type"
FROM hradmin.et_faculty_salary fs left outer join
hradmin.appointments appt
ON trim(fs.empl_id) = appt.emp_emp
and appt.ear_activ <> ''Z''
and appt.ear_type = ''F''
and (appt.ear_class in (''A'',''B'',''C'',''D''))
and appt.ear_bargunit in ( :P755_INC_BARG_UNIT )
WHERE appt.emp_emp is null
RETURN v_sql;
END;

Alex,
try something like:
DECLARE
v_sql VARCHAR2(32767);
BEGIN
v_sql := <YOUR_SQL_STATEMENT_WITH_P755_INC_BARG_UNIT_IN_IT>;
v_sql := REPLACE(v_sql, ':P755_INC_BARG_UNIT',:P755_INC_BARG_UNIT);
RETURN v_sql;
END; But before doing it read this:
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/apex/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:210612357425
After reading you will be able to find the best solution yourself.
Lev

SQL query (pl/sql function body returning query) performance issue

I create my report in building my sql instruction with ( SQL Query pl/sql function body returning sql query );
My report take more than 20 seconds however if i did a cut and paste with the sql code in TOAD the same sql take 1 second.
To try to discover the source of the problem; i take the sql generated by the function and i create another report ( sql query ) this new report take 2 seconds.
My query is very big 25,000 characters with database link.
What is the difference between SQL-quey and sql-query(pl/sql function body returning sql query)
Thanks
Marc

Marc,
Firstly...don't compare the timings from Toad, since often Toad only fetches the first few records for you (i.e. it pages them).
Secondly....the database link could be a factor here, but without seeing your query it's too hard to say.
Can you post the query somewhere (on a webserver say)?

SQL Query (pl/sql function body returning Sql query)

Hi All,
I have created a region of "SQL Query (pl/sql function body returning Sql query)" type and it is working fine , but when I am migrating(export /import) this application from development to systest environment ,
It gives error for this region :
Error ERR-1101 Unable to process function body returning query.
OK
ORA-06550: line 1, column 52: PLS-00306: wrong number or types of arguments in call to 'FU_TRADE_REPORT_QUERY' ORA-06550: line 1, column 45: PL/SQL: Statement ignored
Any pointer ...why this is happening.
Thanks
Dikshit

If your function is a stored function that is called from within APEX (function body not coded into the app itself), have you made sure that the function has been created and compiles ok prior to installing your apex app.
If there are some dependency issues between other PL/SQL units or database objects that are causing your function not to be compiled, you apex install will fail as you are trying to reference an uncompelled bit of pl/sql.
Let me know how you get on
Regards
Duncan

SQL Query ( PL/SQL function body returning query ) page

Hello Friends,
I have a page with type SQL Query ( PL/SQL function body returning query ).
I have written a pl/sql block that returns a sql query - select statment.
Some times i am getting no data found error - does it got to do with the variable that stores the query .
=======================
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
Error ERR-1101 Unable to process function body returning query.
OK
=====================
When the query is returned with records where exactly the records are stored is it in the variable declared in pl/sql block or with the Oracle Apex implicit cursor.
Here's the pl/sql block ..
The query is generated while the user is navigating through pages ..
====================
declare
l_return_stmt varchar2(32767);
l_select varchar2(32000);
l_from varchar2(32000);
l_where varchar2(32000);
l_order_by varchar2(32000);
l_stmt_recordcount varchar2(32000);
l_recordcount number ;
begin
l_select := 'select '||:P10_VARLIST1||:P10_VARLIST2||:P10_VARLIST3
||:P10_VARLIST4||:P10_VARLIST5;
l_from := ' from '||:P10_RELATION;
if length(:P10_WHERE) > 0 then
l_where := ' where '||:P10_WHERE;
else
l_where := '';
end if;
if length(:P10_ORDER_BY) > 0 then
l_order_by := ' order by '||:P10_ORDER_BY;
else
l_order_by := '';
end if;
l_return_stmt := l_select||l_from||l_where||l_order_by;
:P10_STMT := l_return_stmt;
return l_return_stmt;
end;
=============================
Appreciate your help in this regard.
thanks/kumar
Edited by: kumar73 on Apr 22, 2010 6:38 AM

It looks like the query string you are trying to pass back exceeds the 32K limit for a varchar. Where this is happening is kind of difficult to tell as it could be any number of points, and also depends on what you are passing into the process via page items.
I would first try to establish what combination of page items causes this error to occur. Then, starting from the bottom and working your way backwards, I would start 'switching off' some of the items you use to build your query until it breaks again, thus establishing which part is leading to the error.
Also, I'm not sure what :P10_STMT is doing (are you maybe using this for visiblity of the query created)?
It looks like the query string you are trying to pass back exceeds the 32K limit for a varchar. Where this is happening is kind of difficult to tell as it could be any number of points, and also depends on what you are passing into the process via page items.
I would first try to establish what combination of page items causes this error to occur. then, starting from the bottom and working your way backwards, I would start 'switching off' some of the items you use to build your query until it breaks again, thus establishing which part is leading to the error.
Also, I'm not sure what :P10_STMT is doing (are you maybe using this for visiblity of the query created)?

SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body returning SQL query) doesn't return any row

I have a region with the following type:
SQL Query (PL/SQL Function Body returning SQL query).
In a search screen the users can enter different numbers, separated by an ENTER.
I want to check these numbers by replacing the ENTER, which is CHR(13) || CHR(10) I believe, with commas. And then I can use it like this: POD IN (<<text>>).
It's something like this:
If (:P30_POD Is Not Null) Then
v_where := v_where || v_condition || 'POD IN (''''''''||REPLACE(''' || :P30_POD || ''', CHR(13) || CHR(10), '','')||'''''''''')';
v_condition := ' AND ';
End If;
But the query doesn't return any rows.
I tried to reproduce it in Toad:
select * from asx_worklistitem
where
POD IN (''''||REPLACE('541449200000171813'||CHR(13) || CHR(10)||'541449206006341366', CHR(13) || CHR(10), ''',''')||'''')
==> This is the query that does't return any rows
select (''''||REPLACE('541449200000171813'||CHR(13) || CHR(10)||'541449206006341366', CHR(13) || CHR(10), ''',''')||'''')
from dual;
==> This returns '541449200000171813','541449206006341366'
select * from asx_worklistitem
where pod in ('541449200000171813','541449206006341366');
==> and when I copy/paste this in the above query, it does return my rows.
So why does my first query doesn't work?
Doe anyone have any idea?
Kind regards,
Geert
Message was edited by:
Zorry

Thanks for the help.
I made it work, but via the following code:
If (:P30_POD Is Not Null) Then
v_pods := REPLACE(:P30_POD, CHR(13) || CHR(10));
v_where := v_where || v_condition || 'POD IN (';
v_counter := 1;
WHILE (v_counter < LENGTH(v_pods)) LOOP
v_pod := SUBSTR(v_pods, v_counter, 18);
IF (v_counter <> 1) THEN
v_where := v_where || ',';
END IF;
v_where := v_where || '''' || v_pod || '''';
v_counter := v_counter + 18;
END LOOP;
v_where := v_where || ')';
v_condition := ' AND ';
End If;But now I want to make an update of all the records that correspond to this search criteria. I can give in a status via a dropdownlist and that I want to update all the records that correspond to one of these POD's with that status.
For a region you can build an SQL query via PL/SQL, but for a process you only have a PL/SQL block. Is the only way to update all these records by making a loop and make an update for every POD that is specified.
Because I think this will have a lot of overhead.
I would like to make something like a multi row update in an updateable report, but I want to specify the status from somewhere else. Is this possible?

Help with translating SQL query from SQL Server syntax to Oracle syntax

Hi,
is it someone that can help me translate following SQL query from SQL Server syntax to Oracle syntax.
SELECT ID,
[LMT(MTR)] = MAX(case when TYPE = 'LMT' then VALUE end),
[AAD(KGM)] = MAX(case when TYPE = 'AAD' then VALUE end),
[VOL(MTQ)] = MAX(case when TYPE = 'VOL' then VALUE end)
FROM yourtable
GROUP BY ID
Your help is highly appreciated, thanks in advance.

Like this,
SELECT ID,
MAX(case when TYPE = 'LMT' then VALUE end) LMT_MTR,
MAX(case when TYPE = 'AAD' then VALUE end) AAD_KGM ,
MAX(case when TYPE = 'VOL' then VALUE end) VOL_MTQ
FROM yourtable
GROUP BY ID-Arun

DB buffer cache vs. SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache

Hi all,
Started preparing for OCA cert. just myself using McGraw Hill's exam guide. Have a question about memory structures.
Actually, DB buffer cache is used to copy e.g. SELECT queries result data blocks, that can be reused by another session (server process).
There is also additional otion - SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache (from 11g), where also stored the results of such queries.
Do they do the same thing or nevertheless there is some difference, different purpose?
thanks in advance...

There is also additional otion - SQL query & PL/SQL function result cache (from 11g), where also stored the results of such queries.Result cache located in shared pool.So it is one component of shared pool.When server process execute query(and if you configured result cache) then result will store in shared pool.Then next execution time run time mechanism will detect and consider using result cache without executing this query(if data was not changed this is happen detection time)
Do they do the same thing or nevertheless there is some difference, different purpose?.Buffer cache and result cache are different things and purpose also,but result cache introduced to improve response time of query in 11g(but such mechanism also implemented in 10g subquery execution,in complex query).In buffer cache holds data blocks but not such results.
Edited by: Chinar on Nov 4, 2011 4:40 AM
(Removing lots of "But" word from sentences :-) )

A table is 'stuck' in the Discoverer SQL query after rewriting query.

Hi,
I'm using Discoverer 10.1.2.2 on an Oracle 9.2.0.6.0 DB.
I've taken an existing Work Book and modified it. I've removed several fields as well as their table from the 'Selected Items' Window. I've also removed any references to all fields in that table in all Calculations and Conditions.
Yet when I pull the SQL from the View: SQL Inspector That table still shows up and well as the join to it and a field from that table that I'm no longer using shows up as a field in the query. I'm not sure where else to check or what else to to do get this table out of this SQL query.
Does anyone have any suggestions?

Hi
This can happen when someone has drilled inside a worksheet and saved the worksheet. The original or drilled to items are remembered,sometimes long after the drill item has been dispensed with. When this happens typically the only way to remedy the situation is to rebuild the worksheet from scratch.
Before you get into that you do need to do one final scour to make sure that there is absolutely nothing in your worksheet that could cause the folder to be used. It could be in a long forgotten calculation. Sometimes when the only way to get from one folder to another one has to go via an intermediate folder by pulling any old item and then removing the item later. The folder willstill be used though. Could this be happening here?
If you can rule out everything from the above paragraph then I am sorry to say but it sounds like you may have to rebuild from scratch.
Best wishes
Michael

Malfunctioning of SQL Query after customizing the resultSetType ...

I am developing a database system using Microsoft Access as the storage facility. All users are authenticated before accessing the system. I achieve this through the following SQL query that just simply compares the user logon to the Access database. It's working fine initially. However, when the ResultSet was switched from TYPE_FORWARD_ONLY to TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, the executeQuery() failed to return any record. Does anyone know what could be the cause of this misbehavior, and how could I solve it ??
Thanx in advance.
String sql = "SELECT * FROM Staff WHERE username = 'mary' AND strComp(password, 'pp12344', 0) = 0";
stmt = conn.createStatement(ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_READ_ONLY);
results = stmt.executeQuery(sql);
System.out.println(results.next()); //keep saying "false" meaning no record found ??
***********************************************************************

TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE is not supported in the JDBC-ODBC bridge.

Fail to parse SQL query after report attributes changes on sample app

This errors occurs in the sample application istalled in Workspace PMW on the http://htmldb.oracle.com web site. Goto home page, edit Page 1, Select "Top Orders" in Region, select report attributes, change max count from 5 to 5 in "Layout and Pagination", apply changes, run page and parse SQL error occurs. Select "debug" and the following is shown regarding the query.
0.10: query could not be parsed:
SELECT a.ORDER_ID, a.ORDER_TIMESTAMP, a.CUSTOMER_ID,
b.cust_last_name || ', ' || b.cust_first_name cust_name, NVL(a.ORDER_TOTAL, 0)
FROM demo_orders a, DEMO_CUSTOMERS b
WHERE a.customer_id = b.customer_id
ORDER BY NVL(a.ORDER_TOTAL, 0) DESC order by 5 desc,5 desc
failed to parse SQL query:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
I can't see that I'm doing anything wrong but maybe someone can shed some light on this!
Thanks

this is sort of an oversight on our part. what's going on is that the sample app installs with that order by clause in the query. at the same time, the report attributes page for that region has a default sort sequence value of "1 desc" (even though column heading sorting isn't enabled). when you go to that page and try to apply any change, htmldb tries to set things up correctly for you...and you end up with that double order by. the best way to avoid the issue is to remove the order by clause from the query on the Region Definition page.
hope this helps,
raj

Schema name added to SQL query after SQL Command

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for