Screen layout discrepancy between AS01 and AS91

Hi Everyone,
We are trying to create an asset via AS01 and we noticed that the field for serial number is grayed-out. However, in the screen layout settings for the asset master record, the serial number is defined as optional.
On the other hand, if we create a legacy asset via AS91, the serial number is open for editing.
What could be the problem causing this discrepancy?
Thanks in advance.
Joey

Hi
check at what level you maintain this field, Asset class,Main asset or/subasset level.
Check what you are doing i.e. creation of main asset or sub asset.
I think this checking helpful for you.
Regards
Srinivas

Similar Messages

User-exit for As01 and AS91

guy's
We are currently working on creating some custom
defined screen for tcode:as01 and as91 tcode,we
know user-exit and step's to be followed,but don't understand much of that,how i can create custom
defined screen for as01 ,if anybody worked on these
before,then please let us know

Guys
please go to tcode smod and enter enhancement name as
AIST0002 ,click on documentation radio button and diplay,
can anybody help me in following all these step,step 1
and step2 has been done,step3 need to be followed,
but creating screen is not the issue,how these screen
get called is the issue

Hi, my macbook screen goes black at random points when I am using it. I know it is still running as music continues to play and I can vaguely make out the content of what is on the screen. Sometimes the screen will flicker between black and normal. Can I

Hi,
my macbook screen goes black at random points when I am using it. I know it is still running as music continues to play and I can vaguely make out the content of what is on the screen. Sometimes the screen will flicker between black and normal. Can I fix this?

Emily..
Could be the graphics card, run the Apple Hardware Test
If the hardware test doesn't reveal any problems, use Lion Recovery.

NVL in view: discrepancy between 10G and 11G

Hi,
I've discovered some discrepancy between 10G and 11G in a way how view deals with NVL-based column in a where clause.
Here are two examples:
*10G:*
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> create table test_nvl (null_column number);
Table created.
SQL> insert into test_nvl values (null);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> create view view_nvl as select nvl(null_column,0) null_column from test_nvl;
View created.
SQL> select * from view_nvl where null_column is not null and null_column = 0;
NULL_COLUMN
0
*11G*
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
SQL> create table test_nvl (null_column number);
Table created.
SQL> insert into test_nvl values (null);
1 row created.
SQL> commit;
Commit complete.
SQL> create view view_nvl as select nvl(null_column,0) null_column from test_nvl;
View created.
SQL> select * from view_nvl where null_column is not null and null_column = 0;
no rows selected
Does anyone know why it behaves differently?
I couldn't find any documentation regarding this.
Or I'm just missing something here.
Thanks

BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE     11.2.0.2.0     Production
TNS for HPUX: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CREATE TABLE test_nvl (null_column NUMBER);
INSERT INTO test_nvl
     VALUES (NULL);
COMMIT;
CREATE VIEW view_nvl
AS
   SELECT NVL (null_column, 0) null_column FROM test_nvl;
SELECT *
FROM view_nvl
WHERE null_column IS NOT NULL AND null_column = 0;
NULL_COLUMN
0

[svn] 2644: First pass at unifying layout APIs between UIComponent and GraphicElement, more to come with additional check-ins.

Revision: 2644
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-07-28 16:58:09 -0700 (Mon, 28 Jul 2008)
Log Message:
First pass at unifying layout APIs between UIComponent and GraphicElement, more to come with additional check-ins.
reviewed by Ryan, Glenn, Gordon, Chet
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/core/Group.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/BitmapGraphic.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Ellipse.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/FilledElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/IGraphicElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Line.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Path.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/Rect.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/StrokedElement.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/TextBox.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/TextGraphic.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/graphicsClasses/GraphicElement .as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/src/flex/graphics/graphicsClasses/TextGraphicEle ment.as
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

Hi,
I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
Thank you very much.

Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
Thanks.

Master control attribute value discrepency between Master and child org.

Hi Guru,
We are facing a strange issue in Track install Base Attribute values. There are some 60K item having discrepency in the value of the this attribute between master and child.
We are wondering how it happens as this attribute is master controlled one and we never changed this attribute control and kept as Master controlled. The master value is true
If you guys experience this issue, please let us know the solution that you had applied to fix this issue.
regards
venkat

Try executing the vo1 query before setting the bind variable for vo2, then execute the vo2 query (if that's what you want to do).

Display discrepancy between PS and Lr / ACR

On the discussion forum of the french magazine Chasseur d'Images, someone submitted a display discrepancy with Photoshop & Lightroom.
The example was a grey chart. If I open the file in both Lr and ACR 4.1, there is no differences between them - of course - but there is a quite strong pink cast. If I open it in Photoshop, the cast isn't there, even if select Prophoto RGB as working space.
Any clue ?
Gilles.

Could it be related to the issues described in this (long) thread?
Uli Oertel, "Color management bug?" #1, 7 Mar 2007 1:34 pm
Disappointingly, despite the fact that multiple persons have confirmed the behavior mentioned there, and I (among others) have sent a bug report to Adobe, there has been *zero* feedback. A simple 'we're looking into it' would have been a good start.
As it stands, I have no clue whether it's actually worth my time to provide Adobe with a good, detailed bug report. For all I know, the server redirects these reports to /dev/null.
Simon

Vendor balance shows discrepancy between S_ALR_87012082 and FAGLB03.

Dear expert,
These 2 reports currently shows discrepancy in balance.
I came to know S_ALR_87012082 report ( vendor balance in local currnecy) has more vendor records than FAGLB03.
Namely, some of vendors are not displaying in FAGLB03 but showing S_ALR_87012082 .
Could you inspire me why this problem arised and how to fix it?
Is it related to balance carry forward something?
where should i doubt?
Sincerely,
J.
Edited by: Jimmy Choi on Jan 3, 2011 5:51 PM

If you do not see balance carryforward amounts in FAGBL03 are you using all vendor Recon accounts?

Occasional grey screen when switching between SL and Windows

Hi folks,
I set up my new Mac Mini to dual-boot with Windows XP using boot camp. Sometimes when I switch from one to the other the system hangs on a grey screen and I have to shut down using the power button. This happens both when I choose restart and hold down the options (alt) tab and when I use system preferences and choose the boot drive from the menu. This is my config:
Mac Mini 2009 with 120GB HDD and 2GB RAM, running Snow Leopard and WindowsXP, Microsoft Natural Curve Keyboard 2000 and Logitech Optical mouse (both USB),
HP 1310 AIO inkjet printer. I am networked to an HP 1320tn laserjet printer and an NAS that is formatted to FAT32. Everything works.
Additionally, I have an external drive (2.5" HDD) that connects to the back of the Mini using two USB cables for power. I'm pretty sure I have the external drive formatted to FAT32 because both operating systems can see the contents.
I am wondering if the external drive is sometimes confusing the bootloader (or whatever it's called in the Mac world) and is the source of my problems. I am open to suggestions.
Thanks in advance,
Bryan

Well, I eliminated one problem: the external HDD was indeed formatted NTFS. I just installed a new external HDD formatted FAT32, connected by firewire, so I was able to take one USB device out of the system (and free up two USB ports). So far the computer is booting properly with no hangs and I am able to access, read, and modify documents from the ext drive when I am in SL.
Also, just for giggles, I ordered an Apple keyboard to further reduce incompatability risks (and to get the Apple shortcut keys. However, I am not parting with my Logitech mouse: must have two buttons.
We'll see if the problems occurs again.

Memory discrepancy between iPod and iTunes

I just bought a new 30GB iPod today. My iTunes library says that I have 9.45GB used, but when I loaded the music onto the new iPod it says I've used 9.54GB - not 9.45GB. Why the discrepancy and how do I fix that?

Hi!
My name is Florian and I know, what´s youre problem...
With Windows XP, I think you have NTFS on your HDD.
When you format the iPod for Windows (the iPod's operating system can't have other) you have only FAT on your iPod.
Short intro in file systems:
your HDD is a circle. in the middle of the disc (lowest radius ) there is saved, where the files are on your HDD. Your HDD is composed out of litlle "squaers" (width is very, very little). and this squares have a definite bigness. in NTFS the bigness is just littler than in FAT. So if you have a part of a file (this squares are very very little capacity) you have a part of a file is littler than a sqare, this capacity is wasted.
==> bigger sqares in FAT => more waste.
Hope could help you. For more infos, visit wikipedia
(teh operating system of iPod (with games,...) is already abstracted from the 30 GB (the 30GB are not 30GB, only 27,89...) because of the management system of the file-system (FAT, NTFS,...))
IT-Freak

Photo count discrepancy between Mac and IPad

On my Ipad, I have 392 photos in My PhotoStream, but on my Mac the Photostream says 477.
Why the discrepancy?

Are you able to view all 3 of those photos in the full size mode?
One thing you can try is Try the following:
1 - launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down and rebuild the library.
2 - Run Option #1, Repair Permissions, followed by Option #4, Repair Database, if needed.
OT

Masters not applying to pages, discrepancy between design and preview mode

Hi there,
I am having a crazy time with Muse, please please help me... I see some of you have looked at the post, but no help yet. Please don't let me down. SOOO confused!
1) Master pages are not fully applying to the pages I assign, only parts of them.
Above you can see that the sub-pages and the "WORK" page all have the C-Master applied to them, but then you look at one of those pages and not all of the features are there.
Above is the C-Master page
Above is one of those sub-pages (coffee tables) with the C-master applied, yet the navigation menu is missing!?!?
2) Also the formatting is completely on the third image is completely wrong. There is extra space at the bottom of the page and yet I cannot move the page toggles to be the same as it is on the master. These formatting/margin/page size issues run throughout my pages and I cannot get them to all be the same! HELP!
3) The page looks different in the design mode than it does in the preview mode.
I am so confused and have gone through this from scratch once before thinking I did something wrong but I have had the same result.
Please help me!!!
Thank you!!
- Carly

Hi Parikshit,
The sticky footer sounded promising, but it didn't change anything. I still can't move those bottom toggles to be at the desired ruler mark.
As for the margins... Its my understanding that whatever you have in a master page will be applied to the pages you assign, but the content and spacing is different. There is no content that would push the page to extend further down, which I have seen done before. And because I cannot individually move the toggles I have no way of adjusting the spacing. I am going for a seamless look between pages, where the size and content of the page remains the same while the images in my portfolio change.
Even if I go to Page > Page Properies and try to enter the correct numbers, it still doesn't affect the page.
Does that clarify?
Also, I am running 7.1 on a Mac OS 10.9...does that have something to do with it?
Thank you so much for responding!
- Carly

Color discrepancy between Lightroom and Camera Raw

I'm new to LR and came across a color issue when viewing the photos in LR.
When view the RAW in LR, I see a color discrepancy compare with ACR. The color in LR is more like the JPEG view in Windows Photo Viewer (an non color-managed application). I suspect it's a color space config but can't find any in LR as in PS.
When I changed my monitor's ICC profile to "SRGB IEC61966-2.1", all the applications, LR, ACR, WPV, look the same then. It's said that profile just for troubleshooting and should change back to monitor's profile. Can someone help to explain what's happen and what should I do to get consistent color? Thanks a lot!

It sounds like the monitor profile from the monitor manufacturer is not compatible with LR. This is a common problem, and you have confirmed it by temporarily switching to sRGB.
If the only profiles you have available are sRGB (which is consistent but may be wrong) and the monitor profile (which doesn’t work) then for more accurate color you’ll need to buy a hardware calibrator.
I use the i1DisplayPro. Others might use a Spyder or a ColorMunki, although the i1DisplayPro has some more detailed options for creating profiles (Matrix vs LUT or ICCv2 vs ICCv4) that can be necessary to make LR happy, or at least my preference is to have a more powerful program in case I do need to tweak things. I haven’t ever used a ColorMunki or Spyder so perhaps they work fine, too. I think the color-measuring hardware with the i1 is better, though. I guess you get what you pay for.

Color discrepancy between FCP and Photoshop

I'm having trouble with a discrepancy b/w FCP text and Photoshop text. We chose a color of 162-56-25 (reddish orange) for FCP text for a project I'm editing. When we created graphics in photoshop and After Effects with those same values, and brought them into final cut, the color ended up being much lighter. Anyone know why? We've got multiple people working on the project, and on the the graphics. I'd like to standardize the color value, instead of having everyone trying to match. Tks!

Sure. But if I'm looking at BOTH the FCP generated text and the Photoshop and AE graphics in final cut, and on the same monitor, shouldn't they look the same? I don't mind if I'm not seeing them with complete accuracy in FCP, i.e. I don't mind if they look slightly different on different monitors, but I want them all to match.
Does that make sense? I guess the key piece of info I left out is that I'm looking at the AE and Photoshop text IN FINAL CUT.

Screen layout discrepancy between AS01 and AS91

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for