Search Filters

Hi, I have in my system DSEE 6, because it is part of the Sun Java Communications Suite (its works fine for me).
But now, im installing WebSynergy Portal, and i want to use my Directory Server to authenticate the users.
Configuring, in the autentication settings I have a LDAP section, and the form ask for the this information:
* Connection
Base Provider URL: ldap://192.168.200.54:389
Base DN: o=company.com,o=itac
Principal : cn=admin,cn=Administrators,cn=config
Credentials: ***************************
then, the test Connection Information display: "Liferay has successfully connected to the LDAP server."
my question is: how i know from my DirectoryServer the next mappings?
* Users
Authentication Search Filter      [by default: (mail=@email_address@) ]
Import Search Filter      [by default (objectClass=inetOrgPerson) ]
-User Mapping-
Screen Name      [     ]
Password      [     ]
Email Address      [     ]
Full Name      [     ]
First Name      [     ]
Last Name      [     ]
Job Title      [     ]
Group      [     ]
* Groups
Import Search Filter      [     ]
-Group Mapping-
Group Name      [     ]
Description      [     ]
User      [     ]
thanks.

Please log the question in the forum that handles portal server or liferay.This is not actually a problem with the directory server, so can't help.

Similar Messages

Can we add search filters to CV04N?

Hi,
What i am being asked to do is add different search filters to CV04N. Is it possible to add a search field at CV04N?
My customers case: "We use CV04N to track vehicle software editions. What we need is a screen that we can track software edition documents according to vehicle and date and filter them. I have to be able to give a report like this:
___Vehicle type | Vehicle code | Document Type | Document | Output date__ | From date | etc..___
_______A______|A001_______ | SFT__________ | S001____ | DD/MM/YY_ | DD/MM/YY| etc.._
_______A______|A001_______ | SFT__________ | S002____ | DD/MM/YY_ | DD/MM/YY| etc.._
_______A______|A002_______ | SFT__________ | S001____ | DD/MM/YY_ | DD/MM/YY| etc.._
_______B______|B001_______ | SFT__________ | S002____ | DD/MM/YY_ | DD/MM/YY| etc.._
When i double click to the document field at the report, i can reach Vehicle code (Equipment master column) at Object Links tab. But i have to double click and see the vehicle code then go back and see the date etc."
- Is it possible to add Vehicle type and vehicle code to the basic report of CV04N?
- Or what i have to do is create another report with a Z tcode?
Thanks in advance.

Hai...
Your requirement is very genuine it is already availabale with SAP standards it self, but you have to do little bit configuration,
you can follow the following steps
1) create a class with the tcode CL02, should have all the attributres like Vehical code, vehical type etc, by choosing proper characteristics.
2) Attached this class to that document type in the configuration part.
3) Then you will see Additional Tab in the cv01n, CV02N, CV03N & CV04N screen as soon as you select that document type.
4) Automatically it will come in the output of CV04N.
5) Create you own screen variant for that output
you object will fulfill. Revert if any problem exists.
Cheers
KHS

Problems with IQueryEntry, search filtering by classifications URGENT!!!!

Hi everyone!
I'm developing an application that search in KM, using KM indexmanagement API's for searching with TREX. Everything is work fine, even if I search with custom properties in the documents. My problem is when I try to search filtering with taxonomies and classifications, my query doesn't work, somebody know how is the structure of the IQueryEntryList, I know there is the way to filter by properties:
IQueryEntry queryEntry   = federatedSearch.getNewQueryEntry();
     // custom property
IPropertyName propThemName = new PropertyName(NAMESPACE, THEME);
queryEntry.setPropertyName(propThemName);
queryEntry.setTermAction((byte)4);
queryEntry.setRowType(IQueryEntry.ROW_TYPE_ATTRIBUTE);
queryEntry.setValue(getSelectedTheme()+"*");
queryEntry.setPropertyOperator(IQueryEntry.PROPERTY_OPERATOR_EQUAL);
queryEntry.setTermWeight(1.0F);
How can I do it to filter by the documents classifications ????
any help is welcome
Thanks!
Leslie
Message was edited by: Leslie Calderon

You might start a search with your query:
// get a search object
IIndexService indexService = (IIndexService)ResourceFactory.getInstance().getServiceFactory()
      .getService(IServiceTypesConst.INDEX_SERVICE);
IFederatedSearch federatedSearch = (IFederatedSearch) indexService.getObjectInstance(
      IWcmIndexConst.FEDERATED_SEARCH_INSTANCE);
// use here the most adequate method for your application
ISearchSession session = federatedSearch.searchWithSession(queryEntryList, indexes, resourceContext, sortProperty);
// fetch the result documents
session.getSearchResults(int from,int to);

Search/filtering within playlists feature removed

Hi,
Spotify updated itself yesterday to version 1.0.1.988.g8f17a348. The UI got overhauled and few features got removed but the most annoying thing about the change was the disappearance of searching/filtering within a playlist. CMD + F doesn't do anything right now. It was an essential feature used very frequently by me. What exactly was the reasoning behind removing it? Will it be brought back?

What is the thought process going on with the product and engineering team? Can they stop releasing updates to the product that lack critical functionality? This is the same terrible decision making that allowed the "Your Music" features not to exist on the iPad for a year after it was released everywhere else. What's even more frustrating is that I've now received 2-3 updates since the filter feature was removed and it's still missing! I love Spotify, but this total lack of common sense is unbelievably frustrating and deeply concerning. At this point I wouldn't be surprise if you release a new version that didn't have shuffle or just removed the ability play songs altogether. "Hey the new Spotify looks better than ever and soon we'll add back the ability to play music!!!"* At least I know this guy landed on his feet with a great product manager position at Spotify... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxWWJaTEdD0 *Sorry for the deep sarcasm, but I mean, c'mon man!

Ultra Search - Filtering failed

Hi!,
I'm using Oracle 9i and Ultra Search on Windows 2000, the
crawler is able to crawl the files using file:// protocl, but
the log says that filerting failed for PDF and MS - Word
documents, also the search for these documents is not working.
It is urgent as we have to soon implement this..
Can some body help
Arun
[email protected]

Try to verify the Inso filter ctxhx is working in your
environment; manually do the filtering from the
command line. for example:
ctxhx <input file> <output file> ascii iso8859-1 H Meta
where ctxhx is located under $ORACLE_HOME/ctx/bin/ directory

Interactive Report with additional search filters

Hi all,
I want to implement a functionality where I have an interactive report which comes with default Search / Filter option , but I also want to have additional filters which are drop-downs in this case and based on the values selected from the drop-down lists , report displays the values ! How can I implement this functionality where after selecting a value from the drop-down list and then further using interactive report filter to retrieve the results.
Below is my SQL
select * from Atoms_FULL
WHERE (:P6_ANO IS NULL OR ANO = :P6_ANO )
OR (:P6_ATYPENAME IS NULL OR ATYPENAME = :P6_ATYPENAME)
When I implemented this , only the interactive report filters are working but not the customized filters WHICH ARE :P6_ANO AND :P6_ATYPENAME (Drop-down Lists)
I hope I have made the question clear. Let me know if you need any more clarifications.
Would really appreciate if anyone can help in this issue asap.
Thanks,
Rads

What version of apex are you on?
You have to set the session state of page items, this can be achieved by adding your items as comma seperated into the Page Items to Submit attribute, This attribute is available under Interactive Report region source, Dynamic Actions etc.
Thanks,
Vikram

Does anyone know how to associate user-assigned keywords with apps so that they can be searched/ filtered based on the keywords?

I have a large number of apps that exceed the capacity of my multiple idevices and I want to be able to create app lists (similar to playlists) so I can change what goes onto my idevices quickly depending on what is going on. Individually picking apps in itunes each time is time-consuming so I was wondering if there was a way to associate tags or user-assigned keywords to apps so they could be filtered/ searched to select the ones I want.

I have a large number of apps that exceed the capacity of my multiple idevices and I want to be able to create app lists (similar to playlists) so I can change what goes onto my idevices quickly depending on what is going on. Individually picking apps in itunes each time is time-consuming so I was wondering if there was a way to associate tags or user-assigned keywords to apps so they could be filtered/ searched to select the ones I want.

'Search': Filtering issue

Hi All,
I have an issue with the search feature.
I have a couple of select lists and text fields (search) with which i am filtering a report(classic).
for select list i tried using the below two options in the region source where conditions.
1. where emp_name = :P2_EMPNAME
2. where DECODE(:P2_EMPNAME,'%null%',emp_name,null,emp_name,:P2_EMPNAME);
My issue is, when i use the option 2, the number of records are becoming less. For example, if I have 2,000 records. It becomes 1980 when I apply one filter and if I apply another filter it becomes ~1940. Why is this issue occurring? I am using a static LOV for the data i need to filter.
Please suggest me if there is anything i missing or any work around to filter.
And one other issue I have for text field search, I am fine using a text field filter since i usually follow one of the below formats
1. where emp_name like lower(:P2_EMPNAME)
2. where emp_name like '%'||:P2_EMPNAME ||'%'
What if there is a combination of 'capital' and 'small' alphabets in the data? How to overcome this?
I am using 3.1 version and 9i DB
Thanks All in Advance,
Daniel

Daniel,
For your first question, that really depends on what the value of :P2_EMPNAME is and what is in your table. One thing that i include in all of my applications prior to 4.0 is i make an application processes that runs "on load before header" and i set its sequence to -9999.
BEGIN
    FOR x IN (SELECT *
              FROM (SELECT item_name
                      FROM apex_application_page_items aapi
                     WHERE aapi.application_id = :app_id
                       AND aapi.page_id = :app_page_id
                       AND LOWER (aapi.lov_display_null) = 'yes'
                       AND aapi.lov_definition IS NOT NULL
                       AND aapi.lov_null_value IS NULL
                       AND ROWNUM > 0) x
             WHERE LOWER (v (x.item_name)) = '%null%') LOOP
        apex_util.set_session_state (x.item_name, NULL);
    END LOOP;
END; This converts all page items with teh value of "%NULL%" to atually be null so you do not have to work around it anymore. Because this process runs before header and it is set to sequence -9999 it should run before all of your other processing.
You will kill your index by modifying the database column in your predicate but for multicase columns you can use:
where lower(emp_name) like '%' || lower(:P2_EMPNAME) || '%'Cheers,
Tyson Jouglet

Create several search filters fields in SOCO SRM 7.0

Hello
I would like add several search criterial fields in SOCO but i not find where do it. (in the first step)
Someone can help me? Someone know the class-method where do it?
Thank very much
Alfie

Maria
EDIT Action in POWL is disabled for performance reasons. It is possible to activate that button there.
Regarding EDIT button in SC Detail, this function is a standard behaviour where SRM allows the creator/requestor to pull the cart back from approval by using EDIT button.
If you do not want the users to use this button, Go ahead and Disable the button by Class and Method. Make sure you disable the action EDIT only when USER = (CREATOR or REQUESTOR) AND Status of Cart = Awaiting Approval. If you disable it for all users, Approvers will have tough time apprving the carts
Regards
Virender Singh

Trying to get searches filters against Stellant working

I'm trying to run OracleSES searches against a Stellant server to work.
The code follows:
public oracle.search.query.webservice.proxy.OracleSearchResult doOracleAdvancedSearch(
params......ect.
String encodingStyleURI = "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/";
          Vector params = new Vector();
          params.add(new Parameter("query", java.lang.String.class, query, null));
ETC...
          oracle.search.query.webservice.proxy.OracleSearchServiceProxy proxy = new OracleSearchServiceProxy();
// CRASHES HERE......
          Response response = proxy.makeSOAPCallRPC("doOracleAdvancedSearch", params, encodingStyleURI, soapActionURI);
          Parameter returnValue = response.getReturnValue();
          // return (oracle.search.query.webservice.proxy.OracleSearchResult)returnValue.getValue();
     return (oracle.search.query.webservice.proxy.OracleSearchResult)returnValue.getValue();
The error message follows:
No Serializer found to serialize a 'oracle.search.query.webservice.client.Filter' using encoding style 'http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/'.
Is there ANY working code for doing searches out there? The standard Oracle documentation's examples don't work against Stallant.
I'm using import oracle.search.query.webservice.proxy.OracleSearchServiceProxy.*;
due to Stallants Proxy requirements.
Any help would be GREATLY appreciated!

Richard,
For your line item issue, check the PO/line item to confirm the line item has not been deleted.   If it is an active line item the other thing I would check would be the price (confirm it exists on the pricing conditions) .
During the EDI invoice posting process if the PO/line item is set as GR based-IV the idoc will fail if no GR has been made.   Once the GR has been done, the idoc can be reprocessed manually via BD87 or via a scheduled job.
Regards,
Sandra

Mail Search Filters

It appears to me that Mail's search capabilities are very limited. I'd like to switch to Mail from Eudora, but Mail cannot compare to Eudora's search capabilities. Or, is it that I'm missing something?

Firefox doesn't do email, it's strictly a web browser.
If you are using Firefox to access your mail, you are using "web-mail". You need to seek support from your service provider or a forum for that service.
If your problem is with Mozilla Thunderbird, see this forum for support.
[https://support.mozillamessaging.com/en-US/home] <br />
or this one <br />
[http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewforum.php?f=39]

PowerShell Search-Mailbox cmdlet filtering language differences: AQS, KQL, FQL

In Exchange 2010, Search-Mailbox uses AQS as the filtering language. We're preparing to move to Exchange 2013 and want to make sure that the processes we used to search for particular types of emails gets updated before-hand. Initially when we
were looking at Exchange 2013, it appears Search-Mailbox changes to use KQL/FQL (??) so we assumed this would break the search filters we've already written for Search-Mailbox. However, after looking at the syntax for KQL, it looks nearly identical to
AQS and it appears the queries we have written using AQS filters may natively work in Ex2013 with KQL -- can anyone confirm or deny this? If so, it would seem a very close familial language structure between the two (AQS/KQL) but I was unable to find
any documentation on technet connecting them. Does anyone know of any documentation that discusses the move of filtering languages and the deltas them?
TIA.

Hi,
The Advanced Query Syntax (AQS) and Keyword Query Language (KQL), they are two different query languages for different Exchange versions, even though KQL is similar to AQS.
I searched from internal channel, there may be some restrictions when you use
AQS query in Exchange 2013.
I recommend modify your search filters after you migrate to Exchange 2013.
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Using filters in business connectivity services

I am now completely confused by the BCS filter option. I added a Business Data List to a page and connected it to my external content type. Then I have configured 2 filters in SPD:
LocationID = User input (comparison)
AND
Address = wildcard
Default value for both is null and I checked to ignore the Filter if the value is null.
When I search for Address contains "City Name" it correctly returns items with that city in the address but when I search for Location ID equals 12345 it returns all of the items.
How can I fix this?
Thanks!

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you get all items when using filters in business connectivity services.
You need to make sure you define filter in external content type correctly.
If you refine the search results in the External Item picker, you can refer to:
How to: Define Filters for External Item Picker Controls
If you use Content Editor web part implement searching on the External List, you can refer to:
External List with BCS & Search Filters
Thanks,
Linda Li
Forum Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Help required to customize Simple/Advanced Search. Need to add new fields

Hello,
Module: Oracle Sales Online
EBS version: 12.1.3
Jdev version: 10.1.3.3
Scenario:
- We are dealing with standard oracle pages.
- We have TWO "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH"s available. Each "Simple/Advanced Search" can be found by navigating through paths "A --> B" and "A --> B --> C --> D" . Here it means one "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" page is available at page "B" and another "SIMPLE/ADVANCED SEARCH" is available at page "D".
- In the first search page which is at page "B", both Simple as well as Advanced search has a filter field "Win Probability %", of type VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100)
- In second search page, referring to page "D", the Simple search DOESN'T have the "Win Probability %". And the Advanced Search page has the "Win Probability %" but it is of type - NUMBER/MessageTextInput type.
Issue/Requirement:
- The 2nd Simple/Advanced search pages need to have "WIN PROBABILITY %" field and it should be of VARCHAR2/DROPDOWN with values (10, >=10, <=30, 30, >=30, <=50, 50, >=50, <=70, 70, >=70, <=90, 90, 100) just like the way we had in 1st Simple/Advanced search.
Note:
- Again speaking we are dealing with standard oracle pages
- If you go to the "About this Page", interestingly I found:
i. The "message component layout" for both of them is from the same region , i.e., ASNOpptympSrchRN
ii. Rest of the search filters for both the searchs are from common View Object , i.e., OpptySearchVO1 (for Simple search), OpportunityDetailsVO1 (for advanced search)
iii. The "Stack layout" for both the search pages are same, i.e. XXMASOpptyQryCO
iv. None of the fields are rendered to false (everything is set to be rendered TRUE)
Any response is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anand
Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 8:18 AM

"XXMASOpptyQryCO is the name of stacklayout or CO?
What is the CO?
Does both pages share same CO?
have you already extended the CO "XXMASOpptyQryCO"?
what is the original CO then? I think in that CO it must be written somewhere, simple search "search allowed = false""
-Here CO what you are referring is a controller.
-FYI pages share same controller.
-And the original controller for both the pages are OpptyUwqCO. Right now its extended controller is XXMASOpptyQryCO
Fact is I didn't create this search page. It was built by some third party members. Also that I do not have the original source nor the documentation pertaining to it. So could you inform as in how should I navigate to the point "Search Allowed = True"
I should have informed that at "B" page, it has a region /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNMgrOpptyQryRN and at page "D", the region is /oracle/apps/asn/opportunity/webui/ASNOpptyQryRN
Edited by: 933590 on Jul 19, 2012 1:37 PM

Case insensitive in-memory search

I'm trying to create a case-insensitive in-memory search on a ViewObject. I'm using the following code for performing an in-memory search (~ filtering already retrieved rows from the ViewObject which is based on a webservice)
ViewObject vo = service.getMyViewObject();
vo.setQueryMode(ViewObject.QUERY_MODE_SCAN_VIEW_ROWS);
ViewCriteria vc = vo.createViewCriteria();
vc.setCriteriaMode(ViewCriteria.CRITERIA_MODE_CACHE);
ViewCriteriaRow vcr = vc.createViewCriteriaRow();
vcr.setAttribute("MyAttribute", "like 'abc%' ");
vc.add(vcr);
vo.applyViewCriteria(vc);
vo.executeQuery();This all works well .. but when I add vcr.setUpperColumns(true); and change line vcr.setAttribute("MyAttribute", "like 'abc%' "); into vcr.setAttribute("MyAttribute", "like 'ABC%' ");I get the following exception :
Caused by: oracle.jbo.expr.JIException: Method call has no object context
     at oracle.jbo.expr.JIParserMethodNode.evaluate(JIParserMethodNode.java:71)
     at oracle.jbo.expr.JIParserNode.evaluate(JIParserNode.java:740)
     at oracle.jbo.RowMatch.rowQualifies(RowMatch.java:230)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.rowQualifies(ViewObjectImpl.java:1387)
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.rowQualifies(QueryCollection.java:2308)
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.removeUnqualifiedRows(QueryCollection.java:549)
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.buildResultSet(QueryCollection.java:719)
     at oracle.jbo.server.QueryCollection.executeQuery(QueryCollection.java:666)
     at oracle.jbo.server.ViewObjectImpl.executeQueryForCollection(ViewObjectImpl.java:3655)So, my question is: is it possible to do a case-insensitive in-memory search or should I convince my customer to drop the feature-request ;-)

Maybe I should add some extra info:
The viewobject is based on a webservice and not a database. I do not have access to the implementation of that webservice ( I only consume its data and store the results in the viewobject's datacollection ). The VO has no query attached and only has transient attributes. Therefore, I cannot use vo.setWhereClause() ~ I think.
Once I filled the viewobject's datacollection ( by overriding executeQueryForCollection() and createRowFromResultSet(...) ), I would like to filter the datacollection with filterparameters (from my jsf page). This can be enabled by first calling vo.setQueryMode(ViewObject.QUERY_MODE_SCAN_VIEW_ROWS) an
The in-memory search facility in the ViewObject's implementation seems to be restricted in filtering the viewobject's datacollection.
I've tried using ViewCriteria and RowMatch to filter the data ... with no success.
I hope I have explained my situation a bit more. Perhaps someone can help me out ?

Search Filters

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for