Secure name resolution error

Hi,
I'm having trouble connecting to a CalDAV server with iCal in Leopard (5.1.4). Connection is using SSL (https). I get the message "Unexpected secure name resolution error (code -9800)".
Using safari on the same URL works fine and the certificate seems to be correct and trusted.
Any ideas on what the precise cause is? What could be done to fix the situation? What -9800 is exactly? What could be done to investiage further?
Thanks,
-dennis

Hi idea tech,
I started getting these when SSL was enabled on the iCal server using the default certificate. I would suggest either buying a proper signed certificate (which I believe from reading the forums solves it), disabling SSL on the server, or explicitly setting the Account URL to use the normal http port rather than the https port. Ie:
+http://yourserver.domain.com:8008/principals/users/youruser/+
not
+https://yourserver.domain.com:8443/principals/users/youruser/+
Suggest just turning it off if that's an option. (It's simplest and restores auto URL functionality too...) hope that helps...
Cheers,
Fred

Similar Messages

  • Secure connection failed: The Certifying Authority for this certificate is not permitted to issue a certificate with this name. (Error code: sec_error_cert_not_in_name_space) PLEASE HELP ME!!

    I have gone to this website almost everyday for years and I have not changed anything in my internet settings, but now I'm getting this message: secure connection failed: The Certifying Authority for this certificate is not permitted to issue a certificate with this name. (Error code: sec_error_cert_not_in_name_space) The only thing I KNOW I did differently, was I installed a CAC reader to my computer, since then, this has been happening. Is there a setting I can change?? E-mail is: [email protected] Thanks! Megan

    There were recently several users getting this error code who use AVAST 2015. If you recently got that program, please see:
    * [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1029578 Can NOT access https://www.google.com for google voice, mail etc.]
    * [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1028985 Avast Forum connection failed - works in Chrome etc.]
    * [https://support.mozilla.org/questions/1028190 Since last FF update I can't sign out of Yahoo and when I close FF it tells me it has crashed.]

  • Policies not applying + Computer name resolution failure

    Hi everyone,
    We are having issues with the applying of GPOs on our client PCs. We have two DCs - one (Lomu) configured with the master FSMO roles. The issue is completely intermittent, affecting a lagre number of machines that have been reimaged over the Summer (approx.
    50 out of 150 machines reimaged are affected).
    The results of a dcdiag are below:
    Directory Server Diagnosis
    Performing initial setup:
       Trying to find home server...
       * Verifying that the local machine LOMU, is a Directory Server.
       Home Server = LOMU
       * Connecting to directory service on server LOMU.
       * Identified AD Forest.
       Collecting AD specific global data
       * Collecting site info.
       Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=inte
    rnal,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectCategory=ntDSSiteSettings),.......
       The previous call succeeded
       Iterating through the sites
       Looking at base site object: CN=NTDS Site Settings,CN=Default-First-Site-Name
    ,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
       Getting ISTG and options for the site
       * Identifying all servers.
       Calling ldap_search_init_page(hld,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=inte
    rnal,LDAP_SCOPE_SUBTREE,(objectClass=ntDSDsa),.......
       The previous call succeeded....
       The previous call succeeded
       Iterating through the list of servers
       Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Def
    ault-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
       objectGuid obtained
       InvocationID obtained
       dnsHostname obtained
       site info obtained
       All the info for the server collected
       Getting information for the server CN=NTDS Settings,CN=VM-MARADONA,CN=Servers
    ,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
       objectGuid obtained
       InvocationID obtained
       dnsHostname obtained
       site info obtained
       All the info for the server collected
       * Identifying all NC cross-refs.
       * Found 2 DC(s). Testing 1 of them.
       Done gathering initial info.
    Doing initial required tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LOMU
          Starting test: Connectivity
             * Active Directory LDAP Services Check
             Determining IP4 connectivity
             * Active Directory RPC Services Check
             ......................... LOMU passed test Connectivity
    Doing primary tests
       Testing server: Default-First-Site-Name\LOMU
          Starting test: Advertising
             The DC LOMU is advertising itself as a DC and having a DS.
             The DC LOMU is advertising as an LDAP server
             The DC LOMU is advertising as having a writeable directory
             The DC LOMU is advertising as a Key Distribution Center
             The DC LOMU is advertising as a time server
             The DS LOMU is advertising as a GC.
             ......................... LOMU passed test Advertising
          Test omitted by user request: CheckSecurityError
          Test omitted by user request: CutoffServers
          Starting test: FrsEvent
             * The File Replication Service Event log test
             ......................... LOMU passed test FrsEvent
          Starting test: DFSREvent
             The DFS Replication Event Log.
             Skip the test because the server is running FRS.
             ......................... LOMU passed test DFSREvent
          Starting test: SysVolCheck
             * The File Replication Service SYSVOL ready test
             File Replication Service's SYSVOL is ready
             ......................... LOMU passed test SysVolCheck
          Starting test: KccEvent
             * The KCC Event log test
             Found no KCC errors in "Directory Service" Event log in the last 15 min
    utes.
             ......................... LOMU passed test KccEvent
          Starting test: KnowsOfRoleHolders
             Role Schema Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Firs
    t-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             Role Domain Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-Firs
    t-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             Role PDC Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-S
    ite-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             Role Rid Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-S
    ite-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             Role Infrastructure Update Owner = CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,
    CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             ......................... LOMU passed test KnowsOfRoleHolders
          Starting test: MachineAccount
             Checking machine account for DC LOMU on DC LOMU.
             * SPN found :LDAP/LOMU.ryburn.internal/ryburn.internal
             * SPN found :LDAP/LOMU.ryburn.internal
             * SPN found :LDAP/LOMU
             * SPN found :LDAP/LOMU.ryburn.internal/RYBURN
             * SPN found :LDAP/8ee4cad0-4018-428e-b85b-07af05cf933c._msdcs.ryburn.in
    ternal
             * SPN found :E3514235-4B06-11D1-AB04-00C04FC2DCD2/8ee4cad0-4018-428e-b8
    5b-07af05cf933c/ryburn.internal
             * SPN found :HOST/LOMU.ryburn.internal/ryburn.internal
             * SPN found :HOST/LOMU.ryburn.internal
             * SPN found :HOST/LOMU
             * SPN found :HOST/LOMU.ryburn.internal/RYBURN
             * SPN found :GC/LOMU.ryburn.internal/ryburn.internal
             ......................... LOMU passed test MachineAccount
          Starting test: NCSecDesc
             * Security Permissions check for all NC's on DC LOMU.
             * Security Permissions Check for
               DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
                (NDNC,Version 3)
             * Security Permissions Check for
               DC=DomainDnsZones,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
                (NDNC,Version 3)
             * Security Permissions Check for
               CN=Schema,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
                (Schema,Version 3)
             * Security Permissions Check for
               CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
                (Configuration,Version 3)
             * Security Permissions Check for
               DC=ryburn,DC=internal
                (Domain,Version 3)
             ......................... LOMU passed test NCSecDesc
          Starting test: NetLogons
             * Network Logons Privileges Check
             Verified share
    \\LOMU\netlogon
             Verified share
    \\LOMU\sysvol
             [LOMU] User credentials does not have permission to perform this
             operation.
             The account used for this test must have network logon privileges
             for this machine's domain.
             ......................... LOMU failed test NetLogons
          Starting test: ObjectsReplicated
             LOMU is in domain DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             Checking for CN=LOMU,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=ryburn,DC=internal in dom
    ain DC=ryburn,DC=internal on 1 servers
                Object is up-to-date on all servers.
             Checking for CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-
    Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal in domain CN=Configuration,
    DC=ryburn,DC=internal on 1 servers
                Object is up-to-date on all servers.
             ......................... LOMU passed test ObjectsReplicated
          Test omitted by user request: OutboundSecureChannels
          Starting test: Replications
             * Replications Check
             [Replications Check,LOMU] DsReplicaGetInfo(PENDING_OPS, NULL) failed,
             error 0x2105 "Replication access was denied."
             ......................... LOMU failed test Replications
          Starting test: RidManager
             * Available RID Pool for the Domain is 11603 to 1073741823
             * LOMU.ryburn.internal is the RID Master
             * DsBind with RID Master was successful
             * rIDAllocationPool is 11103 to 11602
             * rIDPreviousAllocationPool is 11103 to 11602
             * rIDNextRID: 11249
             ......................... LOMU passed test RidManager
          Starting test: Services
             * Checking Service: EventSystem
             * Checking Service: RpcSs
             * Checking Service: NTDS
                Could not open NTDS Service on LOMU, error 0x5 "Access is denied."
             * Checking Service: DnsCache
             * Checking Service: NtFrs
             * Checking Service: IsmServ
             * Checking Service: kdc
             * Checking Service: SamSs
             * Checking Service: LanmanServer
             * Checking Service: LanmanWorkstation
             * Checking Service: w32time
             * Checking Service: NETLOGON
             ......................... LOMU failed test Services
          Starting test: SystemLog
             * The System Event log test
             Found no errors in "System" Event log in the last 60 minutes.
             ......................... LOMU passed test SystemLog
          Test omitted by user request: Topology
          Test omitted by user request: VerifyEnterpriseReferences
          Starting test: VerifyReferences
             The system object reference (serverReference)
             CN=LOMU,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=ryburn,DC=internal and backlink on
             CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration
    ,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             are correct.
             The system object reference (serverReferenceBL)
             CN=LOMU,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Serv
    ice,CN=System,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             and backlink on
             CN=NTDS Settings,CN=LOMU,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites
    ,CN=Configuration,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             are correct.
             The system object reference (frsComputerReferenceBL)
             CN=LOMU,CN=Domain System Volume (SYSVOL share),CN=File Replication Serv
    ice,CN=System,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             and backlink on CN=LOMU,OU=Domain Controllers,DC=ryburn,DC=internal
             are correct.
             ......................... LOMU passed test VerifyReferences
          Test omitted by user request: VerifyReplicas
          Test omitted by user request: DNS
          Test omitted by user request: DNS
       Running partition tests on : ForestDnsZones
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... ForestDnsZones passed test
             CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : DomainDnsZones
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... DomainDnsZones passed test
             CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : Schema
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... Schema passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... Schema passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : Configuration
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... Configuration passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... Configuration passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running partition tests on : ryburn
          Starting test: CheckSDRefDom
             ......................... ryburn passed test CheckSDRefDom
          Starting test: CrossRefValidation
             ......................... ryburn passed test CrossRefValidation
       Running enterprise tests on : ryburn.internal
          Test omitted by user request: DNS
          Test omitted by user request: DNS
          Starting test: LocatorCheck
             GC Name:
    \\LOMU.ryburn.internal
             Locator Flags: 0xe00033fd
             PDC Name:
    \\LOMU.ryburn.internal
             Locator Flags: 0xe00033fd
             Time Server Name:
    \\LOMU.ryburn.internal
             Locator Flags: 0xe00033fd
             Preferred Time Server Name:
    \\LOMU.ryburn.internal
             Locator Flags: 0xe00033fd
             KDC Name:
    \\LOMU.ryburn.internal
             Locator Flags: 0xe00033fd
             ......................... ryburn.internal passed test LocatorCheck
          Starting test: Intersite
             Skipping site Default-First-Site-Name, this site is outside the scope
             provided by the command line arguments provided.
             ......................... ryburn.internal passed test Intersite
    Just wondering if anyone has similar issues as us on this?
    When running gpupdates, we receive this message:
    The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not resolve the computer name. This could be caused by one of more of the following:
    a) Name Resolution failure on the current domain controller.
    b) Active Directory Replication Latency (an account created on another domain controller has not replicated to the current domain controller).
    Thanks,
    Tom.

    Hi,
    I would suggest you check the group policy service log under event viewer\Applications and Services log\Microsoft\Windows\Group Policy, find the error log and check the Details, then apply the solutions mentioned in the link below depending on the detailed
    error code.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd392593(v=ws.10).aspx
    As
    arnavsharma mentioned, members in GP forum are more familiar with this topic.
    Yolanda Zhu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Can't start Peer Name Resolution Protocol

    I can't start the service 'Peer Name Resolution Protocol' which is required for HomeGroups.
    There are 3 Peer services on my machine. One is running (Peer Networking Identity Manager). The other one (Peer Networking Grouping) is not because it depends on 'Peer Name Resolution Protocol' which fails to start.
    Both Homegroup services are started and I have IPV6 enabled on my NIC and in my LAN properties.
    The event log has this:
    'The Peer Name Resolution Protocol cloud did not start because the creation of the default identity failed with error code: 0x80630801.'
    Using the Event ID web search it leads me to this:
    Event ID 102 — PNRP Protocol
    I tried what they suggested (it's for Vista) but to no avail.  Perhaps some Permission got borked.  Is there a way to recreate the RSA folder and sub-folders with correct Permissions or perhaps it's some other type of problem?
    I do notice I have a lot of entries in "C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Crypto\RSA\MachineKeys"
    Any help in getting this Service started will be appreciated.

    Hi,
    This issue can occur by corrupted PNRP service. You can perform the following steps to troubleshoot the issue.
    1. Please download the correct Network Connection registry file from the link below:
    http://cid-6df3bca839e981ef.skydrive.live.com/self.aspx/.Public/PRNP.txt
    2. There will be the PRNP.txt file. Please right click it and rename it to PRNP.reg file.
    3. Double click the PRNP.reg file and click Yes to import the file.
    Note: To avoid unexpected situation, please back up the computer registry before importing the registry file.
    4. Then, please verify the Peer Name Resolution Protocol service and other failure service again.
    a. Click "Start", go to run, type "services.msc" (without quotation marks) in the open box and press Enter.
    Note: If you are prompted for an administrator password or confirmation, type your password, or click Continue.
    b. Right click the "Peer Name Resolution Protocol" service and choose Properties.
    c. Click on the "Log On" tab, please ensure the option "Local System account" is selected and the option "Allow service to interact with desktop" is unchecked.
    d. Click on the "General" tab; make sure the "Startup Type" is "Automatic". Then please click the button "Stop" under "Service Status" to stop the service.
    e. Then please click the button "Start" under "Service Status" to start the service.
    f. Click OK.
    What's the result?
    If the issue persists, please also perform the suggestions from the following article.
    Home Group Issues
    Thanks,
    Novak

  • Security package specific error occurred when trying to connect to Orchestrator with remote Runbook Designer

    When I try to connect to Orchestrator server with Runbook Designer installed on my laptop I get an error saying "A security  package specific error occurred.".
    Entry from Designer log file is below. I've tried to set error level to 3 and 7 but got no additional info about the error. I'm unable to find any details of the error on server or client side in any logs (Event Log or Orchestrator trace logs).
    Connecting to Orchestrator Management Server with local Designer installed on the server works fine. 
    Orchestrator is installed in AD environment and security groups are properly configured.
    Can anybody help?
    2012-06-12 11:35:51 [7472] 1 Exception caught in long __cdecl `anonymous-namespace'::connectCommunicator(struct HWND__ *,const class std::basic_string<wchar_t,struct std::char_traits<wchar_t>,class std::allocator<wchar_t> > &)
    Connections.cpp(238):
    <Exception>
    <Type>Opalis::Exception</Type>
    <Location>
    void __thiscall ServiceCommunicator::connect(const class std::basic_string<wchar_t,struct std::char_traits<wchar_t>,class std::allocator<wchar_t> > &)
    ServiceCommunicator.cpp(118)
    </Location>
    <MsgCode>A security package specific error occurred.
    </MsgCode>
    </Exception>

    I'm having a similar issue with one of our runbook servers. i cannot deploy any IPs to it. I get the error "A security package specific error occurred". I can open the designer on the runbook server, connect to the management server, and look at
    runbooks. They wont run on the server without the IPs though, but it doesnt seem like a connection issue. i have also tried uninstalling/re-installing the runbook server and i get the same. 
    Has anybody else run into this? 
    Edit:
    Heres an error fromthe event log:
    The Kerberos client received a KRB_AP_ERR_MODIFIED error from the server <Service Account>. The target name used was HOST/server.domain.domain.com. This indicates that the target server failed to decrypt the ticket provided by the client. This can
    occur when the target server principal name (SPN) is registered on an account other than the account the target service is using. Please ensure that the target SPN is registered on, and only registered on, the account used by the server. This error can also
    happen when the target service is using a different password for the target service account than what the Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC) has for the target service account. Please ensure that the service on the server and the KDC are both updated to
    use the current password. If the server name is not fully qualified, and the target domain (domain.domain.COM) is different from the client domain (domain.domain.COM), check if there are identically named server accounts in these two domains, or use the fully-qualified
    name to identify the server.
    So maybe I was just given the wrong account.
    - Slow is smooth and smooth is fast.

  • Name Resolution:Package vs schema

    I have two schema
    1.userA
    2.userB
    In userA I have function test1 & test2
    In userB I have a package userA which has a function test1;
    userB is granted permission to execute test1 and test2 in userA
    grant execute on userA.test1 to userB;
    grant execute on userA.test2 to userB;
    Now I am logged in as userB and execute the following
    select userA.test1(3) from dual;
    Function in package userB is executed;
    select userA.test2(3) from dual;
    It gives the error userA.test2 invalid identifier...
    Now here is my inference..
    When SQL encounters an identifier it first searches for packages...If a package is found all further resolutions are based on that package..So it never finds test2..
    Is this right?I needed confirmation on this
    thanks in advance

    From the "Oracle® Database PL/SQL User's Guide and Reference 10g Release 2 (10.2)" Appendix B section titled "Differences in Name Resolution Between PL/SQL and SQL"
    The name resolution rules for PL/SQL and SQL are similar. You can avoid the few differences if you follow the capture avoidance rules. For compatibility, the SQL rules are more permissive than the PL/SQL rules. SQL rules, which are mostly context sensitive, recognize as legal more situations and DML statements than the PL/SQL rules.
    * PL/SQL uses the same name-resolution rules as SQL when the PL/SQL compiler processes a SQL statement, such as a DML statement. For example, for a name such as HR.JOBS, SQL matches objects in the HR schema first, then packages, types, tables, and views in the current schema.
    * PL/SQL uses a different order to resolve names in PL/SQL statements such as assignments and procedure calls. In the case of a name HR.JOBS, PL/SQL searches first for packages, types, tables, and views named HR in the current schema, then for objects in the HR schema.

  • 1.1.0.21.97 : The OID based name resolution still not working..

    I downloaded (1.1.0.21.97). I still get error loading in native JDBC driver library when trying to open connection to 9.2.0.7 database using our OID based name resolution.

    Thanks Kris for speedy ack.
    Will be looking forward anxiously for the fix as our organizaiton has OID based name resolution implemented, and for general public, I donot want to know about the database location details.
    - Jayant

  • Connecting from a remote computer / name resolution issues

    My work has two SQL Server 2005 databases, one installed on a Windows XP machine (running some equipment) and one installed on a Windows 7 machine (backing up the files from the XP instance).  Both computers run only the default instance.  I had
    replication set up and functioning (data being created on the XP maching was being replicated to the Win 7 machine) for the last three weeks in July.  I recently noticed that the replication is no longer working (the files were no longer being copied),
    and when I tried to check the status I got an error about named pipes, or, if I disabled named pipes "tcp provider error 0 no such host is known".
    At the time I found the replication problem, I could connect to both databases through SSMS on the Windows 7 machine.  On the XP machine, I could use SSMS to browse to the Win 7 instance but SSMS would not connect to the Win 7 instance by name (same
    errors about no such host known); the connection does go through by IP address.  I can ping from the Win 7 machine to the XP machine both by IP address and by name.  I could ping from the XP machine to the Win 7 machine by IP address but NOT by name.
    I tried running the workgroup wizard on the XP machine, thinking this might help with the name resolution problem.  In the wizard, I changed the workgroup name to a new name.  I changed the workgroup name on the Win 7 machine to match.
    This change did not affect the ping status - I can still ping by both name and IP address from the Win 7 machine, and still only the IP address works from the XP machine.  However, now SSMS on the Win 7 machine no longer sees the XP machine!  Trying
    to log in with either the machine name and the IP address, I now get a "timeout expired" message, and the SSMS login browser does not show the XP machine on the network.
    Any pointers on where to look for the cause of this problem would be very welcome.

    There was some problem (bug?) with the remote connections flag on the Win 7 server.  Someone had posted in the comments to a technet article that unchecking the remote connections box, restarting the server, then re-checking it helped them.  I
    tried it, and that fixed the problem with the Win 7 machine being unable to see the XP machine.
    Olaf's suggestion about the Hosts file fixed the problem with the XP machine having to use the IP address - now it can connect by name as well.
    Now I just have left the problem of a broken subscription to my replication, but that's a separate issue so I'll consider this thread closed.  Thanks to everyone who offered suggestions.

  • Role Provisioning failed for System(s) : Connector Name . Error Message : malformedRequest

    Hi Everyone we are facing following issue in GRC-SAC-SAE 5.3_16.3. So far our CUP was connected to Enterprize portal (7.01) and auto provisioning for group to users worked. However now it is not working with below error.
    Role Provisioning failed for System(s) : <Connector Name>. Error Message :
    malformedRequest
    Failed request now
    Successful request used to provision
    Regards,
    Arpan Paik

    Arpan,
    We used to get those "malformed request" errors. We dealt with them by requesting the portal to be re-booted during the weekend maintenance window, making the portal security changes manually, cancelling the CUP request and notifying the requester. It's not a great solution, I know, but it was all we could come up with at the time. Then they upgraded the portal to NW 7.31, which is incompatible with GRC 5.3, and we have to do everything manually, so our situation went from bad to worse. Good luck!
    Cheers,
    Gretchen

  • Problem creating service jboss.security:name=XMLLoginConfig

    Hello,
    I am trying to to run my application using Java 5 and JBoss 4.2.1, but i am stuck in the middle. The error which i received is as follows:-
    2008-10-15 12:56:06,031 WARN | (org.jboss.system.ServiceController:337) - Problem creating service jboss.security:name=XMLLoginConfig
    java.lang.AbstractMethodError: org.jboss.security.auth.login.XMLLoginConfig.jbossInternalLifecycl
    (Ljava/lang/String;)V
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
    at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
    at org.jboss.system.ServiceController$ServiceProxy.invoke(ServiceController.java:978)
    at $Proxy0.create(Unknown Source)
    at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.create(ServiceController.java:330)
    at org.jboss.system.ServiceController.create(ServiceController.java:273)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
    at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
    at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
    at $Proxy4.create(Unknown Source)
    at org.jboss.deployment.SARDeployer.create(SARDeployer.java:258)
    at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.create(MainDeployer.java:969)
    at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:818)
    at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:782)
    at org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer.deploy(MainDeployer.java:766)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
    at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
    at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
    at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
    at org.jboss.mx.interceptor.ReflectedDispatcher.invoke(ReflectedDispatcher.java:155)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.dispatch(Invocation.java:94)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.Invocation.invoke(Invocation.java:86)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.AbstractMBeanInvoker.invoke(AbstractMBeanInvoker.java:264)
    at org.jboss.mx.server.MBeanServerImpl.invoke(MBeanServerImpl.java:659)
    at org.jboss.mx.util.MBeanProxyExt.invoke(MBeanProxyExt.java:210)
    at $Proxy5.deploy(Unknown Source)
    at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.doStart(ServerImpl.java:482)
    at org.jboss.system.server.ServerImpl.start(ServerImpl.java:362)
    at org.jboss.Main.boot(Main.java:200)
    at org.jboss.Main$1.run(Main.java:508)
    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
    2008-10-15 12:56:06,078 INFO | (org.jboss.logging.Log4jService$URLWatchTimerTask:440) - Configur
    ng from URL: resource:log4j.xml
    log4j: Reading configuration from URL resource:log4j.xml
    log4j: Could not find root logger information. Is this OK?I am not able to find the cause of this error. May be deployment is not happening. But the code was properly working on Java 4 and JBoss 3.0.0. Now when i migrated it to newer version , here i get this error.
    Please help me
    Thanks in advance
    Monadear

    Hi,
    Looking at your document URL for the WSDL, the PeopleSoft IB should contain "Service" in it's name, it looks like you are using your IB Gateway URL instead.
    This is what you posted:
    - http://xxx.com:11001/PSIGW/PeopleSoftListeningConnector/CI_Z_POSITION_DATA.1.wsdl
    Try the following and this should resolve your problem.
    - http://xxx.com:11001/PSIGW/PeopleSoftServiceListeningConnector/CI_Z_POSITION_DATA.1.wsdl
    Regards,
    Dan

  • Lync Server 2013 Edge Server NetBios name resolution

    We are working on a lync deployment in a very secure environment where we have Lync edge server deployed, in order to enable ports and traffic between the remote users and the edge servers and vice-versa there is a security vulnerability scan done that has
    shown NetBios name resolution a security threat.
    I just wanted to know if there is any guidence on NetBios name resolution for Lync Edge Servers. Can we disable NetBios services on the edge servers and what could be the possible issues if any?

    My 2 cents worth..
    The Edge server is best suited as a non domain member, all communication with the Edge Server both from the Lync Front Ends and the clients is by means of the DNS name. There are no Lync related services (from my knowledge) that require\use NetBIOS when
    communication from or to the Edge Servers. I have disabled NetBIOS on Edge just recently for similar reasons and am yet to be notified of any issues.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
    Lync Sorted blog

  • ORA-12197: TNS:keyword-value resolution error

    I have configured RAC 10gR2. I tested several sessions from SQL*Plus 10g using the below service name and sessions were well balanced between two nodes.
    RACDB =
    (DESCRIPTION =
    (ADDRESS_LIST=
    (LOAD_BALANCE=yes)
    (Failover=on)
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dbserver)(PORT = 1521))
    (ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = dbserver)(PORT = 1522))
    (CONNECT_DATA =
    (SERVER = DEDICATED)
    (SERVICE_NAME = racdb.interloop.com.pk)
    (FAILOVER_MODE =
    (TYPE = SELECT)
    (METHOD = BASIC)
    (RETRIES=3)
    (DELAY=1)
    But When try to do the same opening sessions (through this tnsnames) from Forms 6i version 6.0.8, I get an error ORA-12197:
    TNS:keyword-value resolution error
    Any Idea?

    Hi,
    Is the env autoconfig enabled? Please id correct upload the complete tnsnames.ora file (Header information)
    Ronald

  • Error encountered while signing: The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error: Access was denied because of a security violation. Error Code: 2148532330

    Last night when i tried to sign a document i received the mesage below and after that it says this document can't be signed what can i do to fix this problem.
    Error encountered while signing:
    The Windows Cryptographic Service Provider reported an error:
    Access was denied because of a security violation.
    Error Code: 2148532330

    I assume you are implying "biztax" application here, right?
    I have contacted their program lead, with no result at all.
    Past days I have been searching for a solution - reinstalls / new systems - no solution.
    This issue appeared a week or two ago only.
    I found http://forums.adobe.com/message/5338853 useful - but no positive results either.
    http://test.eid.belgium.be/faq/faq_nl.htm obviously didnt help either.
    If anyone finds a solution to this issue, please do let me know - any help is appreciated.
    Biztax tells to use the "signature", not the "authentication"  - but it is only Auth. that is showing up as option to sign (that works)
    ps, did you fiddle with the Adobe Reader XI security settings and import that PKI etc as well? I hoped that would be the breaktrough. Sadly i'm still crying in my chair.
    Oh, and dont forget: they claim nobody else got this issue. Maybe one or two people. (We got about 8 customers experiencing exactly the same symptoms at the same time )
    >  I noticed that when I try to open the pdf  document that is 'signed' by the government it is not showing the filename in the title bar, but only " - Adobe Reader".    every piece of info helps I guess.
    Obviously last version of Reader   11.0.03

  • How to use DNS server for name resolution for items which don't exist in active directory domain controller DNS

    Dear Experts,
    In our office we have a domain controller call it 'Office.com', all computers and corporate servers e.g. exchange, antivirus etc. are member of this 'office.com', it is also having a DNS. All users in office have there preferred DNS set to the corporate
    DNS
    We are working for ministry and offering services to them from our data center so have many servers which are for ministry but they are in our data center. For all these servers we created another DNS server which contains all entries for these servers in
    forward and reverse lookup zones. In this DNS we also created a forward lookup zone for our corporate servers and zone name is 'office.com'
    What we are trying to have is name resolution of all servers which are listed in other DNS build in our office on Win 2008 R2 for ministry servers
    If the user change his preferred DNS to ministry DNS he can resolve the ministry server but then we can not control any thing through group policy since they are using other DNS and not the corporate DNS. 
    How this can be done ? like any group policy applied to corporate domain controller must take effect on users and in addition to this user must also be able to resolve server names in ministry project DNS
    Please assist ASAP.
    regards,

    Hello,
    ok so the GPO setting doesn't apply in any case.
    Clients machines use the first DNS server in the list of configured ones on the NIC. If that one is available search for additional DNS servers will stop.
    What i can not really understand is your description about the second DNS server. This should normally either another DC with AD integrated DNS, so everything is replicatedwithin AD replication or you use a secondary DNS on domain member server that pulls
    the informations from the Master.
    It sounds for me that you have configured a machine with DNS server role and created manually the zone with the same name as the domainand manually create there the required A records?
    Best regards
    Meinolf Weber
    MVP, MCP, MCTS
    Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
    My Blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/mweber/
    Disclaimer: This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

  • Remote LAN Name Resolution on VPN not working after upgrading to iOS8

    Has anyone come across the problem since upgrading to iOS8 where remote LAN name resolution does not work when connected to the remote LAN with VPN.  Everything worked fine on iOS7 and continues to work okay on devices that have not been upgraded.
    If I'm connected with WiFi on the local network, I am able to resolve the FQDN to a local IP address.  The problem arises when I'm away from the office, on either LTE or another WiFi and I start a VPN connection to the office.  The VPN connects without any problems.  If I try to connect to a desktop with the FQDN it never connects.  I will work if I connect with the IP address.  If I try to do an nslookup of the FQDN, I don't get a response.  I am however able to get a response when performing an nslookup for google.com.
    The VPN we are using is PPTP to a Windows network.

    Has anyone come across the problem since upgrading to iOS8 where remote LAN name resolution does not work when connected to the remote LAN with VPN.  Everything worked fine on iOS7 and continues to work okay on devices that have not been upgraded.
    If I'm connected with WiFi on the local network, I am able to resolve the FQDN to a local IP address.  The problem arises when I'm away from the office, on either LTE or another WiFi and I start a VPN connection to the office.  The VPN connects without any problems.  If I try to connect to a desktop with the FQDN it never connects.  I will work if I connect with the IP address.  If I try to do an nslookup of the FQDN, I don't get a response.  I am however able to get a response when performing an nslookup for google.com.
    The VPN we are using is PPTP to a Windows network.

Maybe you are looking for