Seeburger - async receiving MDN problem- no binding found for AS2

Hi guys!
We have configured AS2 receiver adapter but during receiveing Async MDN we get following error (sending of message is successful) :
Cannot receive async MDN: com.seeburger.as2.exception.AS2PluginException: Inbound communication from 90586 to 22266 not allowed: com.seeburger.conf.BackingStoreException: Unable to execute query because: com.seeburger.xi.config.ConfigException: No binding found for: AS2, http://seeburger.com/xi, Gloria, R3
Note: Gloria & R3 are names of XI identifiers (scheme: XIParty) and 22266 & 90586 are names from AS2ID scheme - alternative identifiers.
22266 - is sender of original message
90586 - is receiver
What is wrong on the settings? Why the sending message uses alternative identifiers and incoming MDN does not?
Thanx for answers & suggestions!
Peter

Hi Peter
checkm this thread discuss the same ..... hope it will solve ur all querry
Seeburger AS2 Adapter No binding found for: AS2, http://seeburger.com/xi
Thanks !!!
Questions are welcome here!!
<b>Also mark helpful answers by rewarding points</b>
Thanks,
Abhishek Agrahari

Similar Messages

Error like -- No outbound binding found for

i created a order in one system and want to send to another system
i got errors like given below....can u check and helpme me... how to solve the issue
plz check both errors...
SAP: Stack> Error when determining the inbound interface: For Outbound
Interface http://cgi.com/xi/Global.PurchaseOrderRequest
An inbound interface repeatedly found (at the same transmitter and
Receiver). On the outbound interface http://cgi.com/xi/Global.
Purchase Order Request, a multiple inbound interface found (in
The same transmitter and receiver). </ SAP: Stack>
<SAP: Additional text> No outbound binding found for PC100, cgi_PurOrdrProcessing, PC200, SAPESD_SalOrdrProcessing, http://cgi.com/xi/Global, Purchase Order Request </ SAP: Additional Text>
<SAP: Stack> There is a problem with the recipient agreement for the station PC100-cgi_PurOrdrProcessing to receiver PC200-cgi_SalOrdrProcessing, http://cgi.com/xi/Global.PurchaseOrderRequest occurred: No. outbound binding found for PC100, cgi_PurOrdrProcessing, PC200, cgi_SalOrdrProcessing, http://cgi.com/xi/Global, Purchase Order Request </ SAP: Stack>
<SAP: Retry> M </ SAP: Retry>
i am already checked the config.part and cache als ...still the error exist
kindly help on this issue//
best regards,saran

Hi
refer this for related discussion
Error when trying multiple inbound interface determination for IDOC
Check your receiver identification configured in the Integration Directory for this combination of inbound interface, namespace, and business system. Also Make sure your file adapter is configured to send with the correct outbound interface/interface namespace.
Regrds
Anusha Ramsiva

LoadDB problem: no version found for the database

HEllo,
I try to use the loadDB directive with an existing pool and wlst offline but I always receive the error "No version found for the database". I tried to create a pool with the console and use it as loading pool but that didn't worked.
I saw in the script.log file that my pool was correctly found but it seems that it can't found the driverName attribute of my pool when trying to get version.
I have checked and the drivername is correctly set.
Any idea? I will post the complete stack and the script.log later.

here is the full stack:
com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLSTException: com.bea.plateng.domain.scrip
t.ScriptException: No version is found for database:
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.CommandExceptionHandler.handleEx
ception(CommandExceptionHandler.java:33)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.handleException(
WLScriptContext.java:897)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.loadDB(WLScriptC
ontext.java:817)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(PyReflectedFunction.java
at org.python.core.PyMethod.__call__(PyMethod.java)
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java)
at org.python.core.PyInstance.invoke(PyInstance.java)
at org.python.pycode._pyx0.loadDB$22(initWls.py:98)
at org.python.pycode._pyx0.call_function(initWls.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java)
at org.python.core.PyFunction.__call__(PyFunction.java)
at org.python.pycode._pyx4.f$0(CCFF_offline.py:17)
at org.python.pycode._pyx4.call_function(CCFF_offline.py)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java)
at org.python.core.Py.runCode(Py.java)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.execfile_flags(__builtin__.java)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.execfile(__builtin__.java)
at org.python.core.__builtin__.execfile(__builtin__.java)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Unknown Source)
at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(PyReflectedFunction.java
at org.python.core.PyReflectedFunction.__call__(PyReflectedFunction.java
at org.python.core.PyObject.__call__(PyObject.java)
at org.python.pycode._pyx3.f$0(<input>:1)
at org.python.pycode._pyx3.call_function(<input>)
at org.python.core.PyTableCode.call(PyTableCode.java)
at org.python.core.PyCode.call(PyCode.java)
at org.python.core.Py.runCode(Py.java)
at org.python.core.Py.exec(Py.java)
at org.python.util.PythonInterpreter.exec(PythonInterpreter.java)
at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runcode(InteractiveInterpreter
.java)
at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runsource(InteractiveInterpret
er.java)
at org.python.util.InteractiveInterpreter.runsource(InteractiveInterpret
er.java)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLST_offline.handleInteractiveMo
de(WLST_offline.java:137)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLST_offline.main(WLST_offline.j
ava:79)
Caused by: com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptException: No version is found fo
r database:
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor.getSQLFiles(ScriptExecut
or.java:2731)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor.loadDB(ScriptExecutor.ja
va:1056)
at com.bea.plateng.domain.script.jython.WLScriptContext.loadDB(WLScriptC
ontext.java:815)
... 40 more
here is the script.log part:
2007-01-23 08:50:12,127 INFO [main] com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - find JDBCConnectionPool "CCFFMainPool" as obj5
2007-01-23 08:50:12,127 INFO [main] com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - succeed: find JDBCConnectionPool "CCFFMainPool" as obj5
2007-01-23 08:50:12,127 INFO [main] com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - loadDB obj5
2007-01-23 08:50:12,137 DEBUG [main] com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - ScriptExecutor JDBCInfo:
DB2 Any:
CCFF_L1-tables.sql
Initial_Insert.sql
2007-01-23 08:50:12,137 DEBUG [main] com.bea.plateng.domain.script.ScriptExecutor - Database name:

Problem : applet not found for installation

After downloading cap file i try to create applet instance and select it.My script file that i send to apdutool look like this
powerup;
//then select the installer applet using this command
0x00 0xa4 0x04 0x00 0x09 0xa0 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x62 0x03 0x01 0x08 0x01 0x7f;
//then create wallet instance as
0x80 0xb8 0x00 0x00 0x0b 0x09 [here wallet applet AID]
//then select the wallet applet
0x00 0xa4 0x04 0x00 lc [here wallet applet aid that i specify while converting to cap file]
powerdown;
when i send this script file to jcre then for select installer applet sw1 sw2 is 9000 but for second apdu command means creation applet returns apdu response that is 6443 means applet not found for installation and similarly third apdu command responses is not proper
i don't know where is problem bcoz the script file that i create from scriptgen tool by giving cap file as input runs properly by jcre but when after appending my own apdu commands e.g. create applet,debit or credit then apdu responses r not valid.................plz help me that why all this happened
thanks

To use the JCRE you are running the reference implementation. That tool needs you to download the CAP file and the CAP components. That's provided in the results from the scriptgen tool.

No Receiver agreement found for Sender

Hello,
I have a scenario like this : sending an IDoc from R/3 4.6c to R/3 4.7 through XI 3.0.
I am struck up with the follwoing Error in SXMB_MONI
"outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04"
The Complete TRACE is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPR46</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-SET_IDOC" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-ITAB_TO_BINARY" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = F0EAB201EEA5F74A814EF22C32394FD0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO____0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping required</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">processing the outbound binding</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">search outbound bindings</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
I have made neccesary Configurations for the Receiver agreement in the Configuration Directory...
Anybody could please help me out...
Regards,
Romit Arun Shankar

Hi Frank,
Many Thanks for your reply.The problem got sorted out and the IDoc(ORDERS04) which i send in SAP 4.6c gets into SAP 4.7 AS ORDERS04 but i have a new problem now....
I didnt use any mappings until now...but now i have to have the segment E1EDK14 filled up for Sales organisation, Distribution Channel, Division details as well as the material number. These segments will not be filled up when a PO is sent from the source system.These segments has to be filled only in the XI system...Is it ? or is there any other solution for it....
Now how we can have this segment E1EDK14 which can occur any number of times with constant values for SORG,DV,DC in the mapping process....
Waiting for ur replies....
Bye,
Romit Shankar Arun.
For this

NO listener found for SID on Unix

I have been trying to discover my nodes through Console. It does discover the node, but will not connect to the database. I make sure the agent is start in Unix and I am receiving a message "No listener found for SID". I need HELP!!!!
Please email at [email protected]
null

Hi,
I've got the same exception on client certificate authentication with CertLoginModule: ID=CERT_AUTH_FAILED
I have installed EP 6 SP2. I have followed the SAP Enterprise Portal Security Guide.
Does someone know how to solve it?
Thanks a lot

No inconsistency found for CCLM extractors

Dear colleagues,
I tried to configure scenario "Custom Code Management" and when I performed activities on step 6.2 Activate Extractors I received yellow message:
No inconsistency found for CCLM extractors
If I uncheck CCLM all are OK.
Could you please help me to resolve it?
Thanks a lot,
Alexander

Hi,
As Aneesh said, first Check the table T006 for the record for 'BOX' unit. If it is not there you have to do Replcation of Units from source system.
It does not affect the data existing in datatargets. It simply update the table T006.
Then after also check the table T006 for this record.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Problem when defining correlation with subsequent Async Receive Step.

Hi, all:
We have defined a BMP process, like below:
Receive (Start Process) --> Sync Send --> Sync Send --- Async Send
Now we need to have additional steps added into the process: Async Receive.
Now we have problem defining the correlation:
   Since this Async step is not the start of the process, we have to use correlation, if we leave it blank, a red question mark stays, and we can not active BPM.
   When we define the correlation, we just expect one message type to be received from a Async system.
   In the correlation condition editor window, we would like to choose "Interface Variable" and assign value to the container element that reference the asbtract interface.
   however, when we selection optiontb "Interface Variable", there is value "interface" already fill up, we can not select container element from the elements list.
Any one has such experience ?
Thanks in advance !
John

Hi
I think you are facing problem with corrrelation. Follow this procedure to define correlation : -
1. Switch from Container window to Correlation List, here define a correlation variable.
2. Now switch from Graphical Editor to Correlation Editor.
3. There in Correlation Name choose your Correlation variable.
4. In the Correlation Container define a variable.
5. In Involved Message window choose your message interfaces that are used to correlate. Here you should have message interface of your second receive step with another message interface.
6. Now in correlation editor's Properties window assign field of your involved message interface to the variable that you have defined in 4th step.
7. Now switch to Graphical Editor of you BPM. And Activate your correlation in First receive step and Use Correlation it in subsequent receive step.
This is the whole procedure to define a correlation and use it.
If you need further clarification plz revert.
Regards,
Sami.
Reward pointa if helpful.

Problem with BPM: no receive step found for message ....

Hello,
I have the follwing problem with a BPM ina PI 7.3 system.
I created a BPM for the following 'process':
We will receive an IDOC from SAP ECC, then call a synchronous webservice and finally send the result back to ECC.
I created my BPM.
Now when I send the IDOC, the interface is triggered but it gets stuck in the queue with message 'No receive step found for message ...'. I get this message when I go to Tx SMQ2 and try to simulate the message
I have already refreshed the CPA cache without result however.
in SXI_CACHE I can find my IP* and the status = '0' ( So i guess this is OK )
I do not use correlations in my BPM.
In my configuration I can find my sender agreement and interface determination towards the service (abstract) which is defined in the receive step of the BPM.
Does anybody have any ideas what can be wrong ?
Thanks,
Erwin
Edited by: Erwin Van Lysebetten on Oct 27, 2011 10:37 AM

Hi Erwin, delete Integration Process in the Directory Integration and import it again.

Seeburger error - No matching inbound binding found

Hi
I am trying to buld a interface using Seeburger AS2 adapter. I have done all the config in XI and Seeburger level. But when customer sent the message he gets following error.
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden^M
server: SAP J2EE Engine/7.00^M
content-type: text/html^M
content-length: 826^M
date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:50:04 GMT^M
^M
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en-US" lang="en-US">
   <head>
      <title>SEEBURGER AS2 Server: Forbidden </title>
   </head>
   <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" link="#0000ee" alink="#0000ee" vlink="
#551a8b">
      <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" border="0" width="100%" bgcolor="#dc4560">
         <tbody>
            <tr><td> </td></tr>
            <tr>
               <td> </td>
               <td valign="middle">
                  <h3>
                     <font face="sans-serif" color="#ffffff">SEEBURGER AS2 Controller</font>
                  </h3>
               </td>
            </tr>
         </tbody>
      </table>
      <br/>
         <font face="sans-serif" size="-1">
           <b>
403 Forbidden
           </b>
         </font>
      <br/>
   </body>
</html>
When I checked the Seebuger log I noticed following
seeburger.as2.AS2Plugin#Plain###Inbound communication from TESTEDI to GFB2BDPI not allowed: com.seeburger.conf.BackingStoreException: Unable to execute query because: com.seeburger.xi.config.ConfigException: No matching inbound binding (message) found for FromParty:PT_TOLL ToParty:PT_GOODMANFIELDER subject:<20081119091602.651278.2248792@> [LOC: com.seeburger.as2.component.AS2Server.checkInboundRelation]#
If someone can help that will be great.
Thanks
Shantha Bandara

Hi,
403 is a standard error if the AS2-IDs are not setup correct. You can also seet his in your log-file:
"Inbound communication from TESTEDI to GFB2BDPI not allowed"
Looks like the SenderAgreement is not referring to the correct parties...
Greetings
Stefan

No outbound binding found. ?

what do we mean by this error:
No outbound binding found.

Hi Pankaj,
Outbound binding problem is because of Reciever Determination/Agreement is not activated or refreshed correctly.
This error occurs when the configuration required at the Integration Directory is not done properly. This includes proper creation of receiver determination, sender and receiver agreements. Also, u need to activate these after creation
1. Try to recreate or refresh and activate it. Then check it.
2. Also do the cache refresh in SXI_CACHE.
3. Also in go to Integration Builder(XI home page)->Administration->Cache Overview and do all the cache refresh.
Regards,
Prateek

S/A bridge problem: No object type found for the message

Hi all,
I've been spending days looking into the following problem. I have a RFCXIFile scenario. The R3 system sends data via an RFC to XI and XI post the data as a flat file on a certain server using FTP.
This scenario worked just fine for 1 exception. I could only run this scenario once. The second time I got timeouts when checking the data sent to my RFC destination using SM58. When I reactivated my RFC communcation channel I could again send 1 RFC to the system. All subsequent tries would fail.
I guess this is due to the fact that I use a synchonous call (RFC) to an asynchronous one. Thus the adapter is still waiting for the response from the XI system and will not accept any further new calls from R3.
So I figure let's use this pattern called the S/A bridge. So I designed everything according to guides and examples and I'm quite certain everything is configured right but when I run the scenario I get the following message:
<i> 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIAdapter</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="BPE_ADAPTER">UNKNOWN_MESSAGE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No object type found for the message. Check that the corresponding process is activated</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error></i>
It seems that the adapter cannot find any integration process to send the message into!?
I've looked at numerous threads on sdn and tried all kinds of stuff (looked at the cache==> code 0 = OK , tried to reactivate my integration process, checked the interface determination,...), but to no avail. Does anybody has an idea what could be wrong ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated for I'm all out of clues....
Bob

First of all, Thank you for trying to help me out here.
Some answer to your suggestions/questions:
The IP has return code 0 in SXI_CACHE. so that doesn't seem to be the problem.
I've checked the BPM for syntax errors. I doesn't have any.
I've reimported the BPM into the integration directory.
And did a full cache refresh in SXI_CACHE. Return code is (stays) zero, so that's OK.
I've already included the error message from SXI_MONI. It is in the last step ("Call Adater") that the error occurs.
The other steps execute just fine...
The RFC communcation channel accepts the incoming RFC call and puts into the pipeline, so no problems with the communication channel either. the problem is actually when the pipeline is trying to forward the message into an IP trhough the BPE_ADAPTER (according to SXMB_MONI).
Therefore I'm not able to go to into PE, because the workflow is never started. the BPE_ADAPTER does not find any active process for the interface determination i've entered.
So i can not debug the IP in the PE and check container variables, like some of you mentioned.
Maybe some more information about the scenario:
The RFC is called from an R3 system to XI over the interface "CONTROL_RECIPE_DOWNLOAD", which is an imported RFC, with a request and response message type.
Then I got a receiver and interface determination with lead the incoming RFC message to the IP, into interface "XI_ERP_MF_MD_CONTROL_RECIPE_REQ_AI_MI".
This is an abstract synchronous interface based on the request and response types of the "CONTROL_RECIPE_DOWNLOAD" imported RFC.
This interface is used the first step (receive) of my BPM as the synchronous interface to open the S/A bridge.
The message (container var) used in this step is
name: CORREQ
Category: Abstract interface
type: "XI_ERP_MF_MD_CONTROL_RECIPE_REQ_AI_MI"
The interface "XI_ERP_MF_MD_CONTROL_RECIPE_REQ_AI_MI" is an abstract, asynchronous interface based on the request type of the "CONTROL_RECIPE_DOWNLOAD".
Then there are 2 send steps for putting the flat files into place and finally i close the the S/A bridge using message:
name: CORRES
Category: Abstract interface
type: "XI_ERP_MF_MD_CONTROL_RECIPE_RES_AI_MI"
The interface "XI_ERP_MF_MD_CONTROL_RECIPE_RES_AI_MI" is an abstract, asynchronous interface based on the response type of the "CONTROL_RECIPE_DOWNLOAD".
I hope this information gives you guys a better understanding of hte problem.
Really looking forward to see more suggestions and to solve this nasty problem ...
Regards,
Bob

"No receiver agreement found" for BPM ???

Hi everybody
I think this could be an issue in the cache. I have a ccBPM and when I am sending the message who starts the BPM to the Integration Engine I got the following error:
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -BS_SQL_Database to receiver -IP_ScanningStatus_01,http://xxxx.com/common/scanning.MI_JDBC_Response_Asyn_ABS</SAP:Stack>
IP_ScanningStatus_01 is an integration process and you do not need a receiver agreement ("not required" in receiver determination) to send a message to an integration process. Two weeks ago the process work and the very strange is, that in sxi_cache it shows the 31.07.2006 as last change/activation, but I did an activation yesterday. A full cache refresh did not change anything and the status of the cache is "up to date". We are on SP14 (:-<)
Regards Oliver

Hi Udo
yes, that is exacly my problem.
I deleted the corresponding processes in the repository and in the configuration. I recreated the process in the repository under the same name and after that I tried to import the porces in the configuration under the same name, but now I got the following error:
Unable to transport object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxxx.com/common/scanning (CE_ONESAP_ACETATE_MFG_xx, 1.0 of celanese.com) of type RepBProcess from application REPOSITORY on system REPOSITORY. Detailed information: Attempt to serialize the generic part of object Integration Process IP_ScanningStatus_01 | http://xxx.com/common/scanning failed(serialization problem)
Any Ideas?
How can I delete the old process out of cache?
Regards Oliver

Correlation issue due to async receive with sync/async bridge

Hi,
I have an Integration process (PI 7.0), which consists of sync/async bridge.
One of the step in the process is async receive.
To avoid any issue with correlation, i placed the whole process (except start and end) into a block and assigned a local correlation to it.
The Sync receive in sync/async bridge will activate the correlation and one of the async receive step in the process will use that correlation.
Normally it worked fine. But during one execution (just for testing), the async receive step did not take input to the process, and so the process execution replied "Timeout in Pipeline". But thereafter i cannot execute the process successfully, even when async takes the input.
And in the BPE monitoring, in workflow log, the process Instances are still "In Progress".
Do we have any way to stop these processes and unlink any possible correlation related to them?

Hi,
A local correlation is only valid for the block for which it is defined. Once the block has been processed, the correlation is no longer active.
If the validity of a correlation is not restricted correctly, the following problems can occur:
¡ Messages that satisfy an active correlation are continued to be assigned to a running integration process. The integration process no longer processes the messages because no processing steps are waiting for the messages.
¡ Messages that satisfy an active correlation are continued to be assigned to a running integration process, instead of starting a new integration process.
You can avoid these problems and make it easier to follow how messages are processed by restricting correlations correctly to the required block.
Please check the local correlations for it
With SXMB_MONI_BPE you can monitor these instances.
But to kill it you need to use tcode SWWL. You can go to SXMB_ADM_BPE to check the BPM related settings.
Thanks
swarup
Edited by: Swarup Sawant on May 31, 2008 1:40 AM

Mapping between Sync sender and Async Receiver

Hi Experts,
How to do mapping between Sync sender and Async Receiver?
Flow: Sync SOAP Sender Client -> First Async webservice call -> Second Sync webservice call
1. I have to send some input/request details to first webservice call. It will just update the database.If I do mapping with SOAP Sender client and first Async webservice.. I am getting timeout, because it expects response mapping too.
2. Only Second webservice call return the response back to SOAP Sender client.Here mapping between SOAP Sender client and Second Sync webservice call. I don't have any problem here.
I have to pass the same request info to both webservice calls, Please tell me how to do the async mapping in BPM?
Regards
Sara

Hello Sara,
Hope these blogs are useful to you..
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/25/understanding-message-flow-in-xi - Message Flow in XI
/people/krishna.moorthyp/blog/2005/06/09/walkthrough-with-bpm - Walk through BPM
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/22/schedule-your-bpm - Schedule BPM
/people/sriram.vasudevan3/blog/2005/01/11/demonstrating-use-of-synchronous-asynchronous-bridge-to-integrate-synchronous-and-asynchronous-systems-using-ccbpm-in-sap-xi - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in
ccBPM
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken] - Use of Synch - Asynch bridge in
ccBPM
Thanks,
Satya Kumar

Seeburger - async receiving MDN problem- no binding found for AS2

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for