Select all where field value is not distinct

Hi.
Let's assume I have a table SAMPLE with data like this:
ID | Number |      date | Data1 | Data2
1 | 0001 | 2001.01.01 | Data1-1 | Data 2-1
2 | 0001 | 2011.01.01 | Data1-2 | Data 2-2
3 | 0002 | 2010.01.01 | Data1-3 | Data 2-3
4 | 0003 | 2008.01.01 | Data1-4 | Data 2-4
5 | 0003 | 2009.01.01 | Data1-5 | Data 2-5
6 | 0004 | 2000.01.01 | Data1-6 | Data 2-6
7 | 0003 | 1999.01.01 | Data1-7 | Data 2-7
What I need is to get all the data from the rows that have NOT distinct Numbers. That is:
ID | Number |      date | Data1 | Data2
1 | 0001 | 2001.01.01 | Data1-1 | Data 2-1
2 | 0001 | 2011.01.01 | Data1-2 | Data 2-2
4 | 0003 | 2008.01.01 | Data1-4 | Data 2-4
5 | 0003 | 2009.01.01 | Data1-5 | Data 2-5
7 | 0003 | 1999.01.01 | Data1-7 | Data 2-7
Note that numbers may not only have duplicates, but triplicates, quadruplicates and n-plicates as well. All the other data in the row may or may not be distinct from the data in other rows with the same Number.
I used
select number, count(number) from SAMPLE
group by number
having count (number)>1
but that only gives me the non distinct numbers and their total count, each number just once. Any ideas how to get the whole record?

Hi,
user9234293 wrote:
It seems to work on Oracle, but not on Informix. By any chance any ideas why?Sorry, I don't know anything about Informix. Since this question only concerns Informix, maybe an Oracle forum isn't the best place for it.
What exactly doesn't work?
Are you getting an error message? Post the error message.
Are you getting the worng results? Explain.
Does Informix lack analytic functions? Then you could do a GROUP BY query, like you originally tried, to get the values that occur more than once, then join the original table to that result set.
Does Informikx not allow sub-queries? The do a self-join of your table, matfching every row to all rows with the same value of number_col. GROUP BY all the columns from one copy of the table, and show use "HAVING COUNT (*) > 1".

Similar Messages

DI: Stock Transfer error (Unique field value does not match the system ...)

Hi
I made an add-on that makes stock transfers via DI API. The add-on has been running for two months with more than 10,000 stock transfers with almost no problems.
The company that is using the add-on have all their products managed by serial/batch numbers.
But just with one transfer Im getting the error in the stock transfer Add() method:
"Unique field value does not match the system serial number [(----)29-52]"
And I tried to debug it without success, I checked that the system serial numbers exists in the origin warehouse and are available. And I really can't find where is the problem.
If somebody knows what this error means, please let me know.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
Allan

Hi János, thanks for your answer.
I found what was the problem, it was not exactly what you told me, but you gave me some insights to found the problem.
The thing is that Im using UDT's to store the information of stock transfers (before creating a real SAP stock transfer), because of the funcionality of the add-on. After some user have done some steps or validations, the add-on actually does the real SAP stock transfer.
The problem here was that my tables had some InternalSerial for some Item, for example the serial A-234, and before the real SAP stock transfer was made, they changed the serial from A-234 to A234 (in the serial number management). So the add-on was trying to create the transfer with the serial A-234, but the serial A-234 no longer exists.
I have to create a validation that if they change the serial number for an item, I have to change it in my UDT's.
On the other hand, Im not sure, but I think that I read before that you made a Warehouse Management add-on. This add-on that Im working now is a kind of warehouse management.
Im having a lot of headaches because the poor accessibility to the user fields in the OSRI and OIBT tables. Im sure that you have faced problems with this. If you have any tips or advices about this it would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Regards
Allan

Why should we select all key fields when using for all entries

Hi,
Why should we select all key fields in our select query when using for all entries statement?
I read about for all entries but this point was not clear in any post.
Please explain me
Regards,
Subhashini

Dear Subhasini,
It is because FOR ALL ENTRIES deletes the duplicate entries before populating the target internal table.
Please do an F1 on FOR ALL ENTRIES & read the SAP documentation.
I mean how duplicate entries will not get deleted when we use this?
Quite simple, if you select all key fields then each entry will be unique & there will not be any duplicate entries to delete !!
BR,
Suhas
Edited by: Suhas Saha on Oct 16, 2009 9:41 AM

How to select all the people that are not in any equipe ?

Hi,
I have a nice SQL expression that gives me as a result all the "AGENTS" (people) that are working in an EQUIPE (a team)
select a."AGENT_ID",
a."NOM" || ' ' || a."PRENOM" "Nom",
c.libelle "Equipe",
a."DATE_EMBAUCHE" "Date embauche",
a."DATE_DEBAUCHE" "Date débauche"
from OBSERVATOIRE."AGENT" a,
observatoire.equipe_agents b,
observatoire.equipe c
where a.agent_id = b.agent_id
and b.equipe_id = c.equipe_id
order by nom
Now, how to select all the agents that are NOT working in any "EQUIPE" (team) ?
I have tried but could not succeed !
Thank you for your kind help.
Christian

Christian from France wrote:
It is not working because the table EQUIPE_AGENTS does not contains a row if the agent is not into any equipe.
CREATE TABLE "OBSERVATOIRE"."EQUIPE_AGENTS"
(     "EQUIPE_AGENTS_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "EQUIPE_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "AGENT_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE)
CREATE TABLE "OBSERVATOIRE"."AGENT"
(     "AGENT_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "GRADES_ID" NUMBER NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "NOM" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE) NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "PRENOM" VARCHAR2(50 BYTE),
     "DATE_EMBAUCHE" DATE NOT NULL ENABLE,
     "DATE_DEBAUCHE" DATE)
The only way to "know" if an agent is not into any equipe (team) is to search into the EQUIPE_AGENTS table, and if we do not find the ID of the agent into this table, then we know that this agent is not into any EQUIPE (team).
I don't know ho to translate this into SQL.And that's what my query does. It uses an OUTER JOIN so that a result record is returned whether or not there is a record in EQUIPE_AGENTS. And the check for EQUIPE_ID is NULL restricts the result set to those where there IS NOT a record in EQUIPE_AGENTS.
A more traditional way would be to use NOT IN or NOT EXISTS clauses, but they can prove inefficient.

When I try to access iTunes or safari, I get the following message:The procedure entry point QTCF_CFHTTP message set header field value could not be located in the dynamic link library QTCF.dll I uninstalled and reinstalled.same result HELP!

When I try to access iTunes or safari, I get the following message:The procedure entry point QTCF_CFHTTP message set header field value could not be located in the dynamic link library QTCF.dll I uninstalled and reinstalled.same result HELP!

Taken at face value, you're having trouble with a QuickTime program file there.
Let's try something relatively simple first. Restart the PC. Now head into your Uninstall a program control panel, select "QuickTime" and then click "Repair".
Does the repair go through okay? If so, are you able to launch iTunes and/or Safari now?

Custom Field value is not getting populated in Display mode

Hi Experts ,
I have created a custom field on sales tab for BP Role Bill to prty in BP transaction in SAP CRM. The problem i am facing is that , after i chose my sales area field value is not populating in first time no matter whether i am in display or change mode but the moment i switch to the other mode the value is being populated. Kindly help me in solving this.
Regards,
Ameet

Dear Chetan,
If the field is added through AET, can you please check the Get & Set Methods?
If the field value has fixed values which you have defined while creating, then check GET_V & GET_P methods.
Thanks & Kind Regards,
Ravi Kumar A R

AET Generated field values are not saved.

Hi Gurus,
I have created two AET fields on the screen (marked below) and that should store values in table CRMD_CUSTOMER_H. When I create a new service request and enter the values and save, AET field values are not saved. Again, when I edit the same service request and enter the values and save , AET field values are saved on the database.
While debugging I found that, relationship BTHeaderCustExt does not exist for the first time and second time onward its appearing. Due to this, data is not being saved at first time (Line no 27 : current is empty).
When tried to create realtionship using create_related_entity , it throwing exception cx_crm_genil_model_error.
Please advice me the soution for the same.
Regards,
Anand

there should be a context node at your view level. Please check ON NEW FOCUS method is implemented or not.
If not, you can implement that method with below code.
    DATA: lv_collection TYPE REF TO if_bol_bo_col,
          entity        TYPE REF TO cl_crm_bol_entity.
*   get collection of dependent nodes
    entity ?= focus_bo.
    TRY.
        lv_collection = entity->get_related_entities(
               iv_relation_name = 'BTHeaderCustExt' ).
        IF lv_collection IS NOT BOUND or lv_collection->size( ) = 0.
          IF entity->is_changeable( ) = ABAP_TRUE.
            TRY.
                entity = entity->create_related_entity(
                 iv_relation_name = 'BTHeaderCustExt' ).
              CATCH cx_crm_genil_model_error cx_crm_genil_duplicate_rel.
*               should never happen
            ENDTRY.
            IF entity IS BOUND.
              CREATE OBJECT lv_collection TYPE cl_crm_bol_bo_col.
              lv_collection->add( entity ).
            ENDIF.
          ENDIF.
        ENDIF.
      CATCH cx_crm_genil_model_error.
*       should never happen
        EXIT.
      CATCH cx_sy_ref_is_initial.
    ENDTRY.
    me->set_collection( lv_collection ).

Select only records where column values are not all equal to zero

Hi everyone, this seems so easy but it's got me stumped on finding a clean, easy way to accomplish this. I'm sure when someone responds, I'll kick myself. So, assume the following is what I've got:
with mytable as (
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'JAN' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'FEB' as monthname, 1 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'MAR' as monthname, 5 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'APR' as monthname, 1 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'MAY' as monthname, 4 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'JUL' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'AUG' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'SEP' as monthname, 1 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'OCT' as monthname, 7 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'NOV' as monthname, 1 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 1' as itemtype, 'DEC' as monthname, 2 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'JAN' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'FEB' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'MAR' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'APR' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'MAY' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'OCT' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'NOV' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual union all
select 'Type 2' as itemtype, 'DEC' as monthname, 0 as theval from dual
select
itemtype,
sum (case monthname when 'JAN' then theval else 0 end) as JAN,
sum (case monthname when 'FEB' then theval else 0 end) as FEB,
sum (case monthname when 'MAR' then theval else 0 end) as MAR,
sum (case monthname when 'APR' then theval else 0 end) as APR,
sum (case monthname when 'MAY' then theval else 0 end) as MAY,
sum (case monthname when 'JUN' then theval else 0 end) as JUN,
sum (case monthname when 'JUL' then theval else 0 end) as JUL,
sum (case monthname when 'AUG' then theval else 0 end) as AUG,
sum (case monthname when 'SEP' then theval else 0 end) as SEP,
sum (case monthname when 'OCT' then theval else 0 end) as OCT,
sum (case monthname when 'NOV' then theval else 0 end) as NOV,
sum (case monthname when 'DEC' then theval else 0 end) as DEC
from mytable
group by itemtype
order by itemtypeI need an outer query around this one or something that will only select "Type 1"... i.e., if all of the months are each equal to zero, don't include the record in the result set.
Summing them to get a total of zero is not an option, as I could have -15 and +15 in different columns, in which case, that record would need to be displayed.
Something as simple as... "where not (oct = 0 and nov = 0 and dec = 0...) at the end is all I seem to need. I've thought about adding a case clause for each column, but that doesn't seem very efficient. Ideas?
Thanks in advance!
Mark
Edit... I know the following will work using the MINUS operator, but my real query is really huge, and I don't want to have to write it twice...
{code}
select
itemtype,
sum (case monthname when 'JAN' then theval else 0 end) as JAN,
sum (case monthname when 'FEB' then theval else 0 end) as FEB,
sum (case monthname when 'MAR' then theval else 0 end) as MAR,
sum (case monthname when 'APR' then theval else 0 end) as APR,
sum (case monthname when 'MAY' then theval else 0 end) as MAY,
sum (case monthname when 'JUN' then theval else 0 end) as JUN,
sum (case monthname when 'JUL' then theval else 0 end) as JUL,
sum (case monthname when 'AUG' then theval else 0 end) as AUG,
sum (case monthname when 'SEP' then theval else 0 end) as SEP,
sum (case monthname when 'OCT' then theval else 0 end) as OCT,
sum (case monthname when 'NOV' then theval else 0 end) as NOV,
sum (case monthname when 'DEC' then theval else 0 end) as DEC
from mytable
group by itemtype
minus
select
itemtype,
jan,feb,mar,apr,may,jun,jul,aug,sep,oct,nov,dec
from (
select
itemtype,
sum (case monthname when 'JAN' then theval else 0 end) as JAN,
sum (case monthname when 'FEB' then theval else 0 end) as FEB,
sum (case monthname when 'MAR' then theval else 0 end) as MAR,
sum (case monthname when 'APR' then theval else 0 end) as APR,
sum (case monthname when 'MAY' then theval else 0 end) as MAY,
sum (case monthname when 'JUN' then theval else 0 end) as JUN,
sum (case monthname when 'JUL' then theval else 0 end) as JUL,
sum (case monthname when 'AUG' then theval else 0 end) as AUG,
sum (case monthname when 'SEP' then theval else 0 end) as SEP,
sum (case monthname when 'OCT' then theval else 0 end) as OCT,
sum (case monthname when 'NOV' then theval else 0 end) as NOV,
sum (case monthname when 'DEC' then theval else 0 end) as DEC
from mytable
group by itemtype
where ( oct = 0 and nov = 0 and dec = 0 and jan = 0 and feb = 0 and mar = 0
and apr = 0 and may = 0 and jun = 0 and jul = 0 and aug = 0 and sep = 0
order by itemtype
{code}
Edit again... Ok, I guess I'm answering my own question here, but I think using a WITH clause to write the main query once and then selecting * from it twice using the MINUS operator in between where the second query has where (oct = 0, etc.) is what I need. If anyone else has better suggestions, please do let me know! Here's the pseudo logic for what I've come up with so far...
{code}
WITH mainquery as (select everything)
select * from mainquery
minus
select * from mainquery where (oct = 0, nov = 0, etc...)
{code}
Thanks again!
Mark
Edited by: user455268 on Mar 1, 2012 7:13 PM
Edited by: user455268 on Mar 1, 2012 7:16 PM

Hi,
You can do that with a HAVING clause:
select
itemtype,
sum (case monthname when 'JAN' then theval else 0 end) as JAN,
sum (case monthname when 'FEB' then theval else 0 end) as FEB,
sum (case monthname when 'MAR' then theval else 0 end) as MAR,
sum (case monthname when 'APR' then theval else 0 end) as APR,
sum (case monthname when 'MAY' then theval else 0 end) as MAY,
sum (case monthname when 'JUN' then theval else 0 end) as JUN,
sum (case monthname when 'JUL' then theval else 0 end) as JUL,
sum (case monthname when 'AUG' then theval else 0 end) as AUG,
sum (case monthname when 'SEP' then theval else 0 end) as SEP,
sum (case monthname when 'OCT' then theval else 0 end) as OCT,
sum (case monthname when 'NOV' then theval else 0 end) as NOV,
sum (case monthname when 'DEC' then theval else 0 end) as DEC
from mytable
group by itemtype
HAVING MIN (theval) != 0
OR MAX (theval) != 0
order by itemtype
;If the values are all 0, then the MIN and the MAX will both be 0.
If either the MIN or the MAX is not 0, then the values are not all 0.
This assumes that the combination (itemtype, monthname) is unique, as it is in your sample data.
If that's not the case, start with a subquery that GROUPs BY itemtype, monthname, so that, when you get to the main query, that combination will be unique.

Field value is not coming in my customize ALV report

Hi All,
Good day.
I have added two fields in a customized ALV report. But the customized report was not developed by me. Therefore I am unable to understand the whole report. As per my requirement I have added 2 fields more like* quantity* & unit field in that ALV. But not understanding why values are not coming in my report though values are there in DB. Plz help me regarding this. The portion of the code is given below.
SORT t_ekbe by belnr.
loop at t_ekbe INTO w_ekbe where vgabe = '1'.
    on CHANGE OF w_ekbe-belnr.
      SELECT MBLNR
        BWART
        SMBLN
        ERFMG   " This is the new added field
        erfme     " This is the new added field
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_mseg
      from mseg
      where mblnr = t_ekbe-belnr
      AND   bwart = '101'.
    endon.
ENDLOOP.
Thanks,
Tripod.

hi ,
Do according to this
SORT t_ekbe by belnr.
if t_ekbe[] is not initial .
      SELECT MBLNR
        BWART
        SMBLN
        ERFMG   " This is the new added field
        erfme     " This is the new added field
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_mseg
    for all entries in t_ekbe
      from mseg
      where mblnr = t_ekbe-belnr
      AND   bwart = '101'.
endif.
after this
loop at t_ekbe .
loop at t_mseg where mblnr = t_ekbe-belnr .
t_ekbe-ERFMG = t_mseg-ERFMG .
t_ekbe-erfme =   t_mseg-erfme .
modify t_ekbe transporting ERFMG erfme .
clear t_mseg .
endloop.
clear t_ekbe .
endloop.
Regards
Deepak .

Field value is not getting populated in Display mode

Hello All,
I have created a custom drop down field in the DEAL component through EEWB. From the GUI, I could able to select a value form the drop down list field and save it.
In DISPLAY mode, the value is not showing but when I change the screen to EDIT mode then the value is getting populated.
Please advise.
Thanks in advance.

When debugging the set_property method I see the following code:
If ME->IS_CHANGEABLE( ) = ABAP_TRUE and                  "CLASS=CL_CRM_BOL_ENTITY
           LV_PROPS_OBJ->GET_PROPERTY_BY_IDX( LV_IDX ) ne IF_GENIL_OBJ_ATTR_PROPERTIES=>READ_ONLY
*     change value
      <VALUE> = IV_VALUE.
In display mode none of these conditions are fulfilled, meaning value is not set.
So, is there a way of avoiding this behavior?

Need help with SQL for selecting ID where the sequence does not match..

I have the following dilemma:
Database contains IDs as follows:
Incident#, Case#, & Part Sequence#
example
Record 1
Incident_Number = 123456
Case_Number = 1
Part_sequence = 1
Record 2
Incident_Number = 123456
Case_Number = 1
Part_sequence = 2
Sometimes the user will delete (let's say) Record 2 after creating a new Record 3
So now the sequencing goes as follows:
Record 1
Incident_Number = 123456
Case_Number = 1
Part_sequence = 1
Record 2
Incident_Number = 123456
Case_Number = 1
Part_sequence = 3
Now there will no longer be a Part_Sequence 2
Need a SQL to select all records where the maximum part sequence > than the count of Incident_number||'-'||Case_number
I tried the following:
select a.incident_number||'-'||a.case_number||'-'||a.part_sequence
from chsuser.a_compl_summary a
where a.entry_date >= '01-may-2011'
and max(a.part_sequence) > count(distinct a.incident_number||'-'||a.case_number)I end up getting a ORA-00934: group function is not allowed here (highlighting on the Max(a.part_sequence) portion.
Any suggestions/hints
Thanks

select incident_number || '-' || case_number || '-' || part_sequence
from (
         select incident_number,
                 case_number,
                 part_sequence,
                 max(part_sequence) over(partition by incident_number,case_number) max_seq,
                 count(*) over(partition by incident_number,case_number) cnt
           from chsuser.a_compl_summary
           where entry_date >= DATE '2011-05-01'
where cnt != max_seq
/SY.

How to Create a Parameterized Report - The select "- ALL-" for department and manager not working.

I downloaded the OEHR Sample Objects application and followed the steps in Oracle® Application Express Advanced Tutorials
Release 3.2.
The parameters and report seem to be working correctly except when I enter "all" for department or manager I get no matching hits.
What's the most efficient way to retrieve "all" if the users selects all for dept and mgr - thus we'd want to return all records in the table.
Region snipprt
Enter Search
Search Employee
Dept
- ALL -
Administration
Marketing
Purchasing
Human Resources
Shipping
IT
Public Relations
Sales
Executive
Finance
Accounting
Treasury
Corporate Tax
Control And Credit
Shareholder Services
Benefits
Manufacturing
Construction
Contracting
Operations
IT Support
NOC
IT Helpdesk
Government Sales
Retail Sales
Recruiting
Payroll
Mgr
- ALL -
Steven King
Neena Kochhar
Lex De Haan
Alexander Hunold
Nancy Greenberg
Den Raphaely
Matthew Weiss
Adam Fripp
Payam Kaufling
Shanta Vollman
Kevin Mourgos
John Russell
Karen Partners
Alberto Errazuriz
Gerald Cambrault
Eleni Zlotkey
Michael Hartstein
Shelley Higgins
The following is the sql that was provided as part of the turitoral.
SELECT
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."EMPLOYEE_ID" "EMPLOYEE_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."FIRST_NAME" "FIRST_NAME",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."LAST_NAME" "LAST_NAME",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."EMAIL" "EMAIL",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."PHONE_NUMBER" "PHONE_NUMBER",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."HIRE_DATE" "HIRE_DATE",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."JOB_ID" "JOB_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."SALARY" "SALARY",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."COMMISSION_PCT" "COMMISSION_PCT",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."MANAGER_ID" "MANAGER_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."DEPARTMENT_ID" "DEPARTMENT_ID"
FROM
   "#OWNER#"."OEHR_EMPLOYEES" "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"
WHERE
     (lower(first_name) like '%' || lower(:P1_NAME) || '%' OR
      lower(last_name) like '%' || lower(:P1_NAME) || '%')
AND department_id = decode(:P1_DEPT,'%null%',department_id,:P1_DEPT)
AND manager_id = decode(:P1_MGR,'%null%',manager_id,:P1_MGR)

Hi,
Use this..
SELECT
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."EMPLOYEE_ID" "EMPLOYEE_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."FIRST_NAME" "FIRST_NAME",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."LAST_NAME" "LAST_NAME",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."EMAIL" "EMAIL",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."PHONE_NUMBER" "PHONE_NUMBER",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."HIRE_DATE" "HIRE_DATE",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."JOB_ID" "JOB_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."SALARY" "SALARY",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."COMMISSION_PCT" "COMMISSION_PCT",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."MANAGER_ID" "MANAGER_ID",
   "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"."DEPARTMENT_ID" "DEPARTMENT_ID"
FROM
   "#OWNER#"."OEHR_EMPLOYEES" "OEHR_EMPLOYEES"
WHERE
    (:P1_NAME IS NULL OR
        (:P1_NAME IS NOT NULL AND
                (lower(first_name) like '%' || lower(:P1_NAME) || '%') OR
                (lower(last_name) like '%' || lower(:P1_NAME) || '%')
    ) AND
    (:P1_DEPT IS NULL OR department_id = :P1_DEPT) AND
    (:P1_MGR IS NULL OR manager_id = :P1_MGR)

Project server 2013----new custom field value is not synced between my work assignment view and project professional

Hi All,
I would like to add a new custom enterprise field in project server to caculate the effective work. I hope it can work as the default field "work" and "overtime work". And I add my custome enterprise field to my work assignment and the
related details view. User can update the values in "my task" but after PM accept the updates, these values are not synced to the project center as well as project professional. Any idea?
Regards,
Anna

Yes, I am saying that the PM cannot see the updated values in the enterprise project in Microsoft Project 2013. It is a task custom field. No errors for it. Would you please help create a task custom field on your side to see whether you can reproduce
this issue? After creating the field, please add it to the "My task" related views so that project members can update the value for the task when they update the task information under "my tasK" page. After that, open the project plan as
project manager to see whether you get the updated value. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Anna

CF9 Problems with Select * query, resulting in Value can not be converted to requested type.

So, I work on a legacy CF web site and there are numerous SELECT * FROM USERS_TABLE queries all over the site.
Well, we changed the structure of said table in the database on our Testing and Staging sites, with no issues.
When we pushed up to our production environment and changed the structure of the production DB table, the server kept kicking back "Value can not be converted to requested type."
After doing some searching out there, it looks like CF caches the structure of the table, and you either have to restart CF to clear it, or rename and then name-back the DSN to fix the issue.
http://www.bennadel.com/blog/194-ColdFusion-Query-Error-Value-Can-Not-Be-Converted-To-Requ ested-Type.htm
That said, this doesn't happen in our testing and staging environments - so what would be the difference?
Is there some setting I need to change in the CF Admin to keep this from happening again?

Also, if you can use a Stored Procedure to retrieve the data, do so. Standard queries gets all the information, anyway, chokes bandwidth passing it all to the CF server, and forces the CF server to filter, sort, and format the data. SPs tell the db server to get ONLY the data requested, and forces the db server to filter and sort the data, leaving only formatting to the CF server.
That's not true. The only time CF messes with data returned from the DB is if there's a maxrows attribute, and the record set returnded from the DB has more than that number of records... which causes CF to truncate the recordset to the correct size before returning it. The DB might or might not stop sending rows down to CF after CF says "yeah, I've got all I want now".
Other than that, for all intents and purposes all CF does with the SQL is pass it to the DB and wait for an answer. The only thing it does to the returned data is to create a CF record set ("query") with it... this does not involve any filtering and sorting.
Adam

Tcode VL10G quantity field values are not displaying ?

Hi All,
In TCODE - VL10G - Sales and Purchase Order display -
After passing the input values it displays the results with minimum fields in the ALV layout. When I add Quantity fields to the layout - WMENG -Order quantity and any other Quantity related fields it is not displaying values in the results. Even though the values exists in the table.
Can anyone tell me what could be the reason? In the input screen u2013 passing the values in USER ROLE tab has anything related to this issue?
I tried to debug and could not find code related to VBEP table or other table which has quantity fields.
Please let me know if any ideas? Thanks in advance.

Hi,
We are using - SAP ECC 6.0 system.
Any hint how I can solve this?
Thanks.

Select all where field value is not distinct

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for