Select more than 1000 APs Prime 2.0

Is there a way to create an ap group in cisco prime 2.0 so that I can select more than 1000 APs for a wireless template?

Hi,
Are the short dumps still getting created or they stopped?
Check the time the short dump came first and check what all programs where running at that time in the system.
This will give a clue.
Thanks,
JituK

Similar Messages

Can columns be more than 1000 in a select query (oracle 11 g)

I am getting this error: "ORA-01792: maximum number of columns in a table or view is 1000"
I have a dynamic query where number of column can increase according to the user input.
They can expect more than 1000 columns. Is it possible to fetch more than 1000 rows in a query?
I appreciate all your help.
Edited by: user10232912 on Apr 26, 2012 2:07 AM

>
They can expect more than 1000 columns.
Then they are idiots. IMO.
Open challenge. Show me an entity with a 1000 attributes and I will show you a flawed data
model and a total lack of grasping fundamentals of implementing that into a relation database product like Oracle.I second that - as someone who once had to ETL a system which had a table with 35.000 fields - that's 35K.
It was a system which made extensive use of arrays - and arrays of arrays of arrays...
Paul...

How can i get more than 1000 items in Custom List Displaying Items?

http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook(List) allows 1000 items Only my AddressBook List, but i have more than 1000 items in my AddressBook list. I want to get items
from AddressBook list and bind in another place using Autocomplete method like this.
=======>>>>listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook.
and my coding in camel like below
protected void btnpopulatedetails_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
SPSite objSite = SPContext.Current.Site;
SPWeb objWeb = objSite.OpenWeb();
objWeb.AllowUnsafeUpdates = true;
SPList list = objWeb.Lists["Address Book"];
SPQuery query = new SPQuery();
query.QueryThrottleMode = SPQueryThrottleOption.Override;
query.Query = "<Where><Eq><FieldRef Name='Title'/><Value Type='Text'>" + txtcustomer.Value + "</Value></Eq></Where>";
query.RowLimit = 500;
SPListItemCollection items = list.GetItems(query);
function fnCustomerSearchBind() {
if ($("input[id$='txtcustomer']").length != 0) {
var collcustomer = searchCustomers('', urlTo, fieldto);
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").autocomplete({
source: collcustomer,
//maxLength:10,
select: function (event, ui) {
//debugger;
event.preventDefault();
$("input[id$='txtcustomer']").val(ui.item.value);
$("input[id$='btnpopulatedetails']").click();
return false;
minLength: 0,
function searchCustomers(value, listurl, fieldto) {
var collcus = new Array();
var custresults;
var url =listurl + "?$filter=startswith('" + fieldto + "','" + value + "')";
//debugger;
$.ajax({
cache: true,
type: "GET",
async:false,
dataType: "json",
url: url,
success: function (data) {
custresults = data.d.results;
//alert(listurl);
// alert(data.d.results);
for (var x = 0; x < custresults.length; x++) {
//alert(custresults[x]['To']);
collcustList.push(custresults[x]['To']);
//debugger;
//debugger;
return collcustList;
In my research listurl=http://.....sites/_vti_bin/listdata.svc/AddressBook has 1000 items in 1st Page by default, So how to change 1st Page by default to All Pages through
code. I think you understand my environment by look above coding, if you don't I am using office 365 sandbox solution. One more thing i know through my research Pages can be change by using Ado.Net Data Service, i tried this one but this one support windows
server 2008 r2 only but i am using Windows Server 2012 r2. Please help me if you know the answer.

Hi,
Here is a blog would be helpful:
ADO.NET Data Services returns 1000 items
https://gilleslauwers.wordpress.com/2010/12/08/ado-net-data-services-returns-1000-items/
Best Regards,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Create table more than 1000 colum

Hello
I have 1500+ column in my select query. how to create table like my query is
create table xyz nologging as
select a1,a2,a3,a4,a5,b1,b2,b3,b4,b5,................a1500
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1
In oracle 10g I can create only 1000 column in a table.
Please suggest

799301 wrote:
My all columns are formulated with different different tables and want to create one intermediate table
below query is just example
select count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=Y and audio=N then 1 else 0 end))) vd_380,
count(unique((case when sysdate >45 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_45,
count(unique((case when sysdate >105 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_105,
count(unique((case when sysdate >195 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_195,
count(unique((case when sysdate >380 then video=N and audio=Y then 1 else 0 end))) ad_380
from abcd a,bcde b
where a.a1=b.b1;
please suggest how create more than 1000 table columnBy creating a proper relation between the "formulated function" and stored value.
Simplistically put:
Do you model invoices as entities INVOICES_2010, INVOICES_2011 and so on?
Or do you model it as INVOICES that has a year (date) attribute?
It does not make sense to put attribute data into the name of entity. Nor does it make sense to put relationship data into the name of an attribute and create a 1000+ attributes as a result.

List with more than 1000 elements

I'm trying to use this query:
select *
from street
where street_cod in ('street_code_list')
It working well when the 'street_code_list' has less than 1000 codes but it fails when it have more, with a message that says that a list can't have more than 1000 elements. How can I fix this problem? Can I use any other kind of object to store my list?
I'm querying the database in ColdFusion using ODBC.
Thank you in advance,
Rui

Another thing to consider doing is simply creating a "list table" which would contain your list elements and allow you to do a
SELECT X
FROM Y
WHERE X IN (SELECT X
FROM Z)
type query.
I don't know where you are getting your list from, but if it is persistant (i.e, doesn't change with every program run) this is certainly a viable option (and may be usable even if the list does change every run).
If this is being executed in PL/SQL (or some other procedural language) you could also just loop through your list: execute the query with the first 1000 list elements and do your processing, then the next, and so on. Of course, to some extent this depends on your processing, but if you need the entire result set before you can process it, then you could store the individual result sets in a PL/SQL table or an array (if you are using Pro*C or whatever) and then process when the PL/SQL table/array was fully populated.

ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns - How to solve this?

Hi,
I got error message 'ORA-24335 - cannot support more than 1000 columns ' when i try to insert x no of rows for a table with following code:
INSERT ALL
INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
SELECT *
FROM DUAL
How to solve above?
What does it really mean? It's not as easy as if my table has 10 columns than I can't insert more than 100 rows (1000 columns divided with 10 columns = maximun 100 rows to insert), or?
Is there a better/more appropriate way to do insert many rows?
Should I do my inserts with an OracleTransaction (My application is developed with C# and asp.net), as ~follows
BEGIN
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('A', 'B', 'C', 1, 2, 3)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('D', 'E', 'F', 4, 5, 6)
INSERT INTO tableA Values ('G', 'H', 'I', 7, 8, 9)
COMMIT
END
Thx in advance!
Edited by: user8819407 on 2010-mar-07 15:40

Hi,
So how did you solve the problem? Can you please give an example?
I have the same problem inserting over 1000 values into my Oracle DB. The table only has 51 columns but to speed up the insert command, I use bulk inserts via insert all command. I need to insert 100 rows at a time for a total of 5100 values.
Example:
SQLCmd = INSERT ALL INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
INTO MYTABLE (VAL_ID,VAL_NAME,VAL_NUM,VAL_TIME,VAL_CMM,VAL_TIME1,VAL_TRIP,VAL_REMAINING,VAL_AGE,VAL_COUNT,VAL_RSTS,VAL_VOLT,VAL_RF,VAL_DC,VAL_HOPS,VAL_STATUS,VAL_ELAPSED,MODIFY_TIME) VALUES (?,?,?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,TO_DATE(?,?),?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,SYSTIMESTAMP)
SELECT 1 FROM DUAL
SQLVals = 1 22C38299 80700334 04-19-2012 13:55:33 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC93000 04/19/2012 13:55:42 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 12 4 0.792191 23 1 0.00 -113.50 13.48 9 1 9
1 36PR7038 8070EDC2 04-19-2012 12:24:35 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60360 04/19/2012 12:24:41 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 7 4 0.757501 3 2 13.88 -114.80 14.06 5 1 6
1 42C63512 8050166F 04-19-2012 16:02:50 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC52420 04/19/2012 16:02:57 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 10 4 0.778471 8 1 0.00 -122.30 13.05 8 1 7
1 33MR3076 80803E75 04-19-2012 13:13:16 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss MCC60330 04/19/2012 13:13:22 mm-dd-yyyy hh24:mi:ss 13 5 0.636721 28 3 0.00 -122.19 0.70 8 1 6
Then I call: &DBInsert($sqlCmd, @sqlVals);
This is the error I get: ORA-24335: cannot support more than 1000 columns.
I need to insert about 879,500 rows (51 cols per row). The values I read from a text file in sets of about 48,000 and put them into a hash. I tried inserting one row at a time, but it takes too long, about 28 hrs! Then, I tried the bulk update with only 6 rows and the total time was about 25 minutes. Which is acceptable to us.
Thanks!

How to pass more than 1000 entries in 'IN' clause, Oracle 11g

Hi All,
I know this is a very common question in Oracle discussion forum. But, Im in different zone.
I use C#, .NET and Oracle 11g. I have a situation where I will create a query statement using 'IN' clause in C# code based on my requirement and execute that statement from code itself with oracle connection object. I do not have any procedures. I must phrase my query statement and pass it on to OracleConnection object to execute it.
My code looks like this....
List<decimal> x_Ids = new List<decimal>();
I will load my IDs into x_Ids here;
string whereInClause = ........I will prepare a 'IN' clause (All IDs separated by ',')
My query would looks like this....
string query = select * from MYTABLE where X_ID in [ whereInClause with more than 1000 entries]
oraConn.ExecuteQuery(query);
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?
Can you please suggest any other workaround to overcome this situation?

>
I have a workaround with OR operator with 'IN' clause like below.
X_ID in [ Ids till 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] OR X_ID in [Next 1000 entries] ....so on.....
It is working, but, I heard that this may slowdown the performance of the application. Is this really a performance hit to my application?There should be no performance difference between a statement like
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5)
OR ID in (6,7,8,10,12) and
select * from myTab
where ID in (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,10,12) The execution plan should be identical.
However those values might better be send as a single object (collection or table of numbers type).
I think the ODP or OO4O connectivity allows to create and such oracle object types.
Another way could be to think about how all the values are created? Did any user enter them manually? Certainly not. Then maybe you can apply the same logic to the SQL statement that created those values in your .Net application.
something like
select * from myTab
where ID in (select t2.FK_ID from otherTab t2 where t2.Col1 = 100) This approach would probably beat all others performancewise. Since you avoid the overhead of constructing the in-lists.

More than 1000 record in IN clause

RDBMS : Oracle 10.2
OS : CentOS 5
Hi,
I have a situation where I have to compare more than 1000 ids in my IN clause.
I have used something like
slect col,col2....
from tble ......
where .....
and id in (--first 1000 ids ---)
or id in (--next 1000 ids ---);
the query is taking a lot time. If I omit second IN clause, it executes instantly .
Can you please suggest how to handle such situation ?

Take your full list of 2000 ids, paste them into a program like Notepad++ (or even regular notepad) then use the replace function to replace all commas with: " from dual union all select ". Add "with a as (select " to the front and " from dual)" to the end also add an alias like aid to the first item in the list. Paste that on the front of your query and change your "in" clause to say "id in (select aid from a)"
Then instead of this:
select col,col2
from tble
where id in (1,2,3,4,5);you'll use this:
with a as (select 1 aid from dual union all
           select 2 from dual union all
           select 3 from dual union all
           select 4 from dual union all
           select 5 from dual)
select col,col2
from tble
where id in (select aid from a);

Query challenge (IN ) not allow more than 1000 numbers

I have this query in the "IN" condition i am passing more than 1000 numbers and it is showing me error "I can insert more than 1000 numbers in "in" condition" like
number like 1,2,3,4,..... until 1000. I am getting error.
How can i write this query as differently
select a.barcode,a.othernumber,a.owner,b.booknum,b.context,c.dept,c.userid,
c.firstname,c.lastname from objects a,bookitem b,users c
where a.othernumber=b.booknum
AND c.userid=a.owner(+)
AND booknum in (#valuelist(search.booknum)#)
order by barcode

you could use a UNION
e.g.
select oid, dob from mytable
where oid in ( mylist of first 1000 )
UNION
select oid, dob from mytable
where oid in ( mylist of the next 1000 or less )
I have this query in the "IN" condition i am passing more than 1000 numbers and it is showing me error "I can insert more than 1000 numbers in "in" condition" like
number like 1,2,3,4,..... until 1000. I am getting error.
How can i write this query as differently
select a.barcode,a.othernumber,a.owner,b.booknum,b.context,c.dept,c.userid,
c.firstname,c.lastname from objects a,bookitem b,users c
where a.othernumber=b.booknum
AND c.userid=a.owner(+)
AND booknum in (#valuelist(search.booknum)#)
order by barcode

More than 1000 Line items

Hi
User has done the billing for 1300 line items by using transaction code VF01. After completing that process there is a option TO release Accounting, when user select on that button system throwing an error "Maximum number of items in FI
reached".
We know that from FI side system will not allow more than 999 line items. Since we are using 4.7 version.
Invoice have already send to the customer. So, How to solve this issue.
Please provide me the solution as early as possible.
Your help would really appreciated.
Regards,
Schilukuri

Hi to everyone,
My issue has been resolved.
My requirement is User has done billing (VF01) for more than 1000 line items. After that he was doing that billing document to release to accounting. That time system was throwing an error message." Maximum number of items in FI
reached"
Solution:
Use Transaction OBCY and give work area VBRK and there you have to give Table name BSEG and give Field name whichever the fields you want to give to group the same line items.(Document may have some same line items).
refer SAP Note:36353.
Regards,
Schilukuri

More than 1000 values

Dear All,
I am using oracle 10g with odp.net. I have values more than 1000 to be passed in the IN condition. How do i achieve this. When i pass the values it says only 1000 parameters are allowed in the IN condition.
Please let me know.
Regards
Fkhan

fkhan wrote:
What i have thought of is to insert all the selected values in a global temporary table and then in my procedure use the subquery and use the values from the global temporary table.A better approach than using a massive IN list of values. But still problematic ito having a user interface deal with a 1000+ item/code selection. Still a performance problem shipping that amount of data across the network every single time from every single client running this app. And still a flawed ito data modelling and 3NF.
The correct approach would be permanent tables to deal with this. In its basic and simplest form:
// defines a keyword for a 1000+ items/codes
KEYWORDS = ( keyword_id, keyword_description )
// associates a keyword id with an item/code id
KEYWORD_MAP = ( keyword_id, code_id )The user interface displays the keyword description. The select clause uses the keyword_id to select from the KEYWORD_MAP the associated list of values as filter criteria for the main query (using a join or IN sub-select for example).
If the keyword is more complex than this basic approach (e.g. partially dynamic and specific per user), then this basic approach can be extended to serve as a "+favourites per user+" list (kind of like bookmarks, but per individual user). Or designed as to cater for the business requirements.
But as you have (very simplistic I realise) describe the problem so far, I do not see a problem as much as a basic flaw in your code and data model.
A user interface for entering and selecting 1000+ codes is clunky. And slow. Sending that data across to Oracle is slow. Inserting that each time around into a temp table for use, is slow.
There's a lot of moving parts here. And that always contributes in degrading performance and making stuff complex (and usually unnecessarily so).

IN operator with more than 1000 values

Hi,
For a given list of IDs (PKs), I need to fetch the corresponding rows.
The problem is that I have more than 1000 values and as far as I know that IN operator is limited to 1000
values.
I thought about using UNION such that each Select contains up to 1000 IDs.
example":
select * from temp where id in(1....1000)
union all
select * from temp where id in(1001....2000)
Is there a better way to do that?
Thanks
dyahav

As others have presented technical solutions, i'll present you a logical one (seemingly logical anyways, but it will depend on your application).
I have seen some applications where you get
select * from some_table where ... <conditions>;That result set is returned to the front end and presented to the users who then pick a series of records and submit another request to the database which ends up being...
--note, this could be a many table join, with lots more information that just the some_table, this is illustrative only
select * from some_table where pk_value in (super_super_duper_list_based_on_last_result_set);If this mimics what you have in your application, i'd recommend just fixing it so the users can select a reasonable set of data, OR the entire set (in the last case you'd just send the <conditions> instead of a massive list of PK values).
Again, highly speculative but i thought i'd mention it in the off chance it's useful to you.

Fetch more than 1000 records

Hi,
I am using APEX_ITEM.SELECT_LIST_FROM_QUERY_XL(). When I try to fetch more than 1000 records in PL/SQL block .It throws character string buffer too small. I donot know how much records it will fetch because it is dynamically generated.
could you please anyone help me out.

Hi
I agree that a popup LOV would be better, for two reasons:
1 - Even if you could construct a select list with over 1,000 items, users may find it awkward to use as they would have to scroll to find the item they want - at best they could type in the first character of an item but they'd have to scroll from then on or keep pressing the same character to move down one item at a time.
2 - The fact that you're using that function to generate the list implies that you are using a tabular form and, therefore, that there will be several instances of the list on your page. If so, the time taken to generate the page and download it may slow page load time considerably.
If you do need to have select lists, there are techniques that you can use to do this - typically, this would involve creating small lists in the form, a hidden select list created as a normal page item and then using javascript to copy the hidden list items into the tabular form fields.
Andy

Save More than 1000 chars in a field of (Z) Database Table?

Hi Friends,
I created a database table with few fields. In the table, one field is REMARKS which should save more than 1000 characters for every record. For that field, I created domain & data element of char with 2000 length. But system gives an error representing that "Should not be more than 255 chars ".
Even, select statement is also retrieving 132 chars only, if remarks are less than 255 and greater than 150 chars.
Could you please provide me solution?
Thanks
Sarayu

Hi,
The Most simple solution for it can be that Divide the field REMARKS of size 1000 in multiples of 200 characters like REMARK1, REMARK2....REMARKn.
Now you can create two FMs :
zset_data: To Store 1000 char long data in Table
Here you will divide the data of Variable (type char1024) in multiples of 200 and will store in REMARK1, REMARK2.....
zget_data: To Get 1000 char long data back from Table
Here you will concatenate REMARK1, REMARK2..... and will store in Variable of Type char1024.
This is the best solution if Table is not going to be maintained by Table Maintenance Generator.
Thanks
Ajay

Trouble with the SQL smt to :list tables having more than 1000 rows

Please I trying to list only tables having more than 1000 rows, but the sql stmt below doesn't work, can someone gives me a tips
select table_name from user_tables where table_name in ( select table_name from user_tables where rownum > 1000 ) : The result is no rows!
But I know that I have at lest 50 tables having more than 1000 rows
Thanks a lot for the help

If your tables are reasonably analyzed, then you can simply query:
SELECT table_name,
num_rows
FROM user_tables
WHERE num_rows >= 1000This will give you quite a reasonable estimate.
Otherwise you have to go for dynamic sql or use the data dictionary to help you generate suitable scripts ....

Select more than 1000 APs Prime 2.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for