Send port filter and Orchestration binding priority

Hello,
say there is some receive port RecvPort1. What will happen if some send port filter has BTS.ReceivePortName == RecvPort1 and some orchestration is binded to RecvPort1 also? When message come to receive location of RecvPort1 will it be transmitted
to send port path or into the orchestration and why?
Thanks in advance,
Tomislav

Here is the pictorial representation of your scenario for better understanding:
In BizTalk subscription, you will have two subscriptions, one subscription- when you start the orchestration (which is directly bound to Receive port) and another subscription when you enlist the send port with filter for the Receive port. Here are
the high level sequence to activities that would happed:
So after the message is received by the Receive port, it would be published to BizTalk message box db.
Subscription evaluation would take place to match subscription for the published message (into BizTalk msgbox db).
As in your case for the published message two subscriptions would be evaluated. And instance of orchestration would receive the message and also the send port with filter which match to the Receive Port which published the message
Note: Image courtesy, Microsoft which I updated for users better understanding :)
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Similar Messages

AS2 over HTTP Send port question.

I have an application that builds and sends flat and EDI files to FTP, FILE, SqlAdapter send ports and now they want AS2 over an HTTP port, I understand the AS2 settings (using party resolution, etc.) what I don't get is how/what exactly is receiving
the message on the other side... They don't have a web service nor a page, I created a site to test but what do I do? Send an edi file to a url????
Bico Bielich

From your question I understand, you have been asked to send message through AS2. Do they also going to receive message through AS2 from their party? Is your question is about how to receive the message through AS2 which you also want to send over AS2?
You can configure
BTSHTTPReceive.dll to receive messages over HTTP and configure the Receive location with AS2 EDI pipeline component to receive messages over AS2 into BizTalk which can be subscribed by your send port filter or Orchestration ( if you have any process
to be applied before sending the message over AS2 send).
Check the Tutorial-3 part of AS2 which illustrate an example which receives an AS2 message through BTSHTTPReceive.dll.
Tutorial 3: AS2 Tutorial
And following references shall help you configure the BTSHTTPReceive.dll:
How to Configure IIS for an HTTP Receive Location
Configuring BTSHTTPReceive.dll to work on IIS 7
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Set Custome pipeline for dynamic send port in orchestration

I need to assign custom pipeline for dynamic send port in an orchestration .

The option is available in the Port Configuration wizard
Thanks, Murugesan M - Please Mark as the Answer, if this answers your question. Please vote as helpful, if this post is helpful.

Mapping between send port and host instance

I am not able to retrieve send port names according to host instance names using C#.NET (WMI) from BizTalkMgmtDb. I had tried using BTSCatalog-Send Port class and MSBTS_SendPort but couldn't get the desired output. Can anyone help me out with the mapping between
send port and host instance?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Pratibha,
BtsCatalogExplorer's SendPort collection doesn't provide access to its corresponding SendHandler/host-Instance name. Only option is to relay on executing the SQL query against the BizTalkMgmtDb. So you can create a C# execute the query as show by la Cour.
Following uses the BtsCatalogExplorer. but as said, there is no option to retrieve its corresponding SendHandler/host-Instance.
private string GetSendPorts()
// connect to the local BizTalk Management database
Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsCatalogExplorer catalog = new Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.BtsCatalogExplorer();
catalog.ConnectionString = "Server=VMBTS2013R2DEV;Initial Catalog=BizTalkMgmtDb;Integrated Security=SSPI;";
string sSendPortName = String.Empty;
try
// display all sendports and status
foreach (Microsoft.BizTalk.ExplorerOM.SendPort sendport in catalog.SendPorts)
sSendPortName += sendport.Name + ", ";
MessageBox.Show(sSendPortName);
catch (Exception e)
catalog.DiscardChanges();
throw e;
return sSendPortName;
Send-Port class doesn't have member to retrieve the send handler, but provides one to Set the send handler:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/microsoft.biztalk.explorerom.sendport.aspx
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Save a copy of file sent through FTP Send Port

How can we save a copy of the file sent through an FTP Send Port?
Here are the details of the scenario:
1. I have an Orchestration which after processing, creates a Flat File
2. Orchestration has a Static One Way Send Port with specify later
3. FTP Send Port is bind to the orchestration
Problem is, I don't want to create an extra file send port in the orchestration.
Requirement is:
When orchestration send the flat file to FTP, I want a copy of the file in a local file location.
BizTalk Specialist

Create a Send Port Group with the two ports in question and bind your orchestration to the Group.
Alternatively you can leverage the BizTalk Archiving Pipeline component from codeplex at
http://biztalkarchiving.codeplex.com/ and use this pipeline on your existing send port.
Regards.

Notify a user after the message is been delivered to the FTP location by the send port

I have a scenario where I need to send an alert to the user after the file is been delivered to the FTP location.
If for any reason if the send port fails and the file is not delivered then the alert should not be sent. If the first attempt fails there will be a retry and the alert should not be sent on every retry. Only after successful delivery of message.
I have a limitation, Just need to implement using the send ports, No Orchestration or no custom artifacts.
Please advice.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks Mallesh Bonla BizTalk Architect

Hi Mallesh,
If you don't want to use any custom artifacts like custom pipeline, then you can consider this option.
Create FTP Receive port/Location (Yes Its Receive) and let it poll for any new files to the FTP location where your send port with FTP has configured for.
In the FTP adapter property (of the above Receive location) set "Delete After Download" -No, "Enable
Timestamp Comparison"-Yes.
Create a send port with file for the above Receive port name. Configure this send port to send email/alert.
This configuration would send an email immediately when the FTP folder receives a file. i.e. As per your requirement, whenever file has been delivered
to the FTP folder/server, the above new receive location would trigger for the newly received file. Since you have enabled "Delete After Download" -No, file would not be deleted from the FTP folder and since you have "Enable Timestamp Comparison"
to Yes, adapter would not retrigger another transfer. In this case the new Receive location would only act as receiving trigger message whenever FTP folder receive a file.
This is the only way you can achieve your requirement without any custom artifacts just with the standard out-of-box components.
Otherwise use
la Cour option of promoting AckRequired to the context to enable delivery notification in messaging only way. If you use Orchestration, you know you can do this
with Delivery notification feature.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Use of Self Correlating direct bind in Orchestration send port

Hi All,
I have seen examples for self correlating direct bind in receive side of orchestration which will be passed as parameter in Start orchestration shape to
get back the response. Could you tell me some scenario's where the self correlating will be used in send port of Orchestration.
Is there any other use of self correlation other than in start orchestration shape.
Thanks,
ChampBoss

If you want your called orchestration to behave like an API call i.e.; support a Request-Response pattern while NOT using a TWO-WAY orchestration port then you would need the self-correlation. How else would you respond to the same thread that called you?
Regards.

How to reject ACK/NACK from other Send Ports to Orchestration

Hi Everyone,
I have a below scenario, Please let me your ideas how can we avoid ACK from other send ports (If there is any failures), in my current scenario getting issues or conflicts because of this
AckRequired.
Key points in my scenarios
SendPort_A is pointing to SAP
SendPort_B is pointing to SQL
Flow
Receive MessageA and Transform to MessageB format, send MessageB to SendPort_A which directly bind to orchestration with transmitted property enabled.
SendPort_B subscribes the same message, output of map with message type as filter condition (we are not expecting any Acknowledge from sendPort_B, because it’s a generic send port for some scenario).
Problem
When I see the context properties both send ports has AckRequired
Property to true (so getting ACK/NACK from both send ports).
I want acknowledgement only form SendPort_A which is bind to orchestration with transmitted property enabled, but not from the SendPort_B which subscribes just with message type.
I have tried the below points but no luck
Created custom pipeline with custom pipeline component to set / overwrite
AckRequired Property to false (Pipeline component is working fine, but nothing is overwriting in context, getting acknowledge back to orchestration for any failure in SendPort_B)
#region IComponentUI
public IBaseMessage Execute(IPipelineContext pContext, IBaseMessage pInMsg)
pInMsg.Context.Write("AckRequired", "http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003/system-properties", false);
return pInMsg;
#endregion
Below images gives some info on the same scenario.
Appreciate your suggestions.
Thanks, SMS Vikas K

Hi Vikas,
Let me know if I understood correctly.
SendPort_B subscribes the same message, output of map with message type as filter condition (we are not expecting any Acknowledge from sendPort_B, because it’s a generic send port for some scenario).
Problem
You have a send port B which is subscribing to the same message using the message type.
You can set additional filters to ignore Acknowledgement-
Ex- Mgtype= "" AND
AckRequired!=True OR
AckRequired!=False
Thanks,
Prashant
Please mark this post accordingly if it answers your query or is helpful.

Request Response Receive Port and Solicit Response Send Port

Can anyone give me some idea how to bind Request Response Receive Port and Solicit Response Send Port with each other through TCP/IP adapter ??

The binding of a Receive and Send Port has nothing to with the choice of Adapter.
1) There is no out-of-the-box TCP/IP Adapter for BizTalk, but several 3rd. Party Adapters has been made, along with this one in CodePlex: http://tcpipbz2010.codeplex.com/
2) Most people will use an Orchestration for binding a SR Send Port to a RR Receive Port. This may not be necessary though. All you need to do is have your Send Port subscribe to your Receive Port (by setting the Filter on the Send Port to "BTS.ReceivePortName
== [The name of your Receive Port]". In this case, internal correlation will make sure that the response is routed back to the Receive Port.
Morten la Cour

BizTalk Server 2013 and deployment MSI with dynamic send ports

Hello community, wonder if any help out there for this odd problem.
Deployment of application msi fails into BizTalk 2013 prod environment, fails when deploying the project dll that contains all the orchestrations,
and reports a failure to apply early bindings. The only early bindings in this project are dynamic send ports. I cannot recreate the problem in in my QAS environment where deployments of the same msi works fine.
I can build an msi without any bindings at all except for the dynamically created ones, and this also display the same behaviour on import.
I have test deployed a 2nd unrelated app that also uses dynamic send ports, and this displays the problem.
Adding the assembly directly to BizTalk console displays the same behaviour.
Deployment of msi apps without dynamic send ports are ok.
The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
No specific further detail is available in the error except.
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Error in Importing Application
Import Wizard[09/05/2014 08:20:47]: Change requests failed for some resources.
BizTalkAssemblyResourceManager failed to complete end type change request.
Unable to deploy early bindings.
Failed to update binding information.
Error in the application.
Other information that may be relevant:
The main difference between QAS and PROD is that PROD is a two node cluster. Import behaviour is the same if attempted on either node. Assemblies are installed in both nodes currently.
The dynamic ports are set on handlers that are non-clustered hosts (all are for adapter type SMTP).
I have ensured that all the adapter handlers are identically setup in both environments.
The project files were migrated to BizTalk 2013 from BizTalk 2010, imported and then converted using VS 2012.
The msi has installed the assemblies as per usual and they do exist in the .net 4 gac
There is a reference to a shared resource in a different application, this application is installed and imported ok.
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully
when converting the project. I could move the functionality into a helper class and forget about using dynamic sends, rather not go down that route. I'm still suspecting this is small difference in setup
of the group between QAS and PROD but I can't see anything jumping out.
Any comments are most welcome.

The dynamic ports use a pipeline including a custom pipeline component which I can confirm is available in the correct directory
C:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013\Pipeline Components
I’m a bit stuck at what to try now, I have option where I could recreate the dynamic ports from scratch in the orchestrations and redeploy to dev in the hope it’s something
that VS2012 didn’t handle too gracefully when converting the project.
Two things.
1. That's what I would do first, recreate (really just change and reset the properties) the Orchestration Ports in Visual Studio.
2. Probably not related but, Custom Pipeline Components should not be placed in the Pipeline Components folder. All Custom Pipeline Components should be in the GAC only. The Pipeline Components folder
is a compatibility vestige from BizTalk Server 2004.

Composite schema for Oracle send port - Binding Issue

Hi this is my composite schema has 2 operations : the first is a generated view that has filter and column tags and the second one is a SQLEXECUTE operation. my problem is I think with the Binding of the composite schema.
this is the schema:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?>
<xs:schema xmlns="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.QueryOracleComposite" xmlns:b="http://schemas.microsoft.com/BizTalk/2003" xmlns:ns1="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE" xmlns:ns0="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS" targetNamespace="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.QueryOracleComposite" xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
<xs:import schemaLocation=".\MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE.xsd" namespace="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE" />
<xs:import schemaLocation=".\OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS.xsd" namespace="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS" />
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:references>
<b:reference targetNamespace="http://Microsoft.LobServices.OracleDB/2007/03" />
<b:reference targetNamespace="http://schemas.microsoft.com/2003/10/Serialization/Arrays" />
<b:reference targetNamespace="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS" />
<b:reference targetNamespace="http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE" />
</b:references>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:element name="Send">
<xs:annotation>
<xs:appinfo>
<b:properties>
<b:property distinguished="true" xpath="/*[local-name()='Send' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.QueryOracleComposite']/*[local-name()='Select' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS']/*[local-name()='COLUMN_NAMES' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS']" />
<b:property distinguished="true" xpath="/*[local-name()='Send' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.QueryOracleComposite']/*[local-name()='Select' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS']/*[local-name()='FILTER' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.OracleDBBindingAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS']" />
<b:property distinguished="true" xpath="/*[local-name()='Send' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.QueryOracleComposite']/*[local-name()='SQLEXECUTE' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE']/*[local-name()='SQLSTATEMENT' and namespace-uri()='http://Comverse.ConcertoSyncSST.MaxDateQuerySQLEXECUTE']" />
</b:properties>
</xs:appinfo>
</xs:annotation>
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="ns0:Select" />
<xs:element ref="ns1:SQLEXECUTE" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
<xs:element name="Receive">
<xs:complexType>
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element ref="ns0:SelectResponse" />
<xs:element ref="ns1:SQLEXECUTEResponse" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
</xs:element>
</xs:schema>
and this is the error received :
A message sent to adapter "WCF-Custom" on send port "WcfSendPort_OracleDBBinding_APPS_View_CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS_Custom" with URI "oracledb://test11i/" is suspended.
Error details: Microsoft.ServiceModel.Channels.Common.MetadataException: Argument ngAPPS.View.CNS_CONCERTO_PROJECTS/Select is invalid.
Server stack trace:
at System.Runtime.AsyncResult.End[TAsyncResult](IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.SendAsyncResult.End(SendAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndCall(String action, Object[] outs, IAsyncResult result)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.ServiceChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
Exception rethrown at [0]:
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.HandleReturnMessage(IMessage reqMsg, IMessage retMsg)
at System.Runtime.Remoting.Proxies.RealProxy.PrivateInvoke(MessageData& msgData, Int32 type)
at System.ServiceModel.Channels.IRequestChannel.EndRequest(IAsyncResult result)
at Microsoft.BizTalk.Adapter.Wcf.Runtime.WcfClient`2.RequestCallback(IAsyncResult result)
MessageId: {29E348F3-BA09-43E8-A8A2-AB499DD856C4}
InstanceID: {82378FAC-9C2E-4D5B-ACB6-18C479A58F3A}
any suggestions?

Hi Yotam,
Do you have Select statement in your Procedure used for SQLEXECUTE? Using "SET NOCOUNT OFF" in your procedure might work for you.
If this answers your question please mark as answer. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Send Port to internally hosted IIS web service needs to run on the SAME IIS SERVER from multiple orchestrations

Hi
We have a multi-server BizTalk environment. We have an Orchestration with multiple call orchestrations in it. Each called orchestration is calling a web service through a 2 way Send Port (which is hosted in IIS on each BizTalk server in our multi server
environment). We have to ensure that each called orchestration is calling these web services on the same IIS server.
I could create a dedicated host instance that the Send Port runs under to run only on one server but then this means that all our DBase traffic is happening on one server. We also thought about using the load balancer some how to achieve this through sticky
sessions etc.
This is all necessary because we are using Entity Framework exposed through web services and we need to manage transactions.
Any ideas on how we may achieve this. I have inserted a picture to try and show the scenario
Biztalk Developer

Haha, Entity Framework strikes again! But seriously, that is a rather odd architectural requirement, double check first. But anyway...
Try this: Configure the Send Port URI to point to something like http://localservicehost/[yourEFService]
Then in the local hosts file (the DNS/IP hosts file), define localservicehost to the local IP address where the service is listening.
That way, the connection will always be made to the local machine. Essentially the same as localhost.

When and how does the message context get removed from the message when we use pass thru send port

Friends,
i have a doubt regarding message context.
Assume i have used XMLRecieve pipeline in the receive side to receive the message so that the message context is created. I.e properties are promoted/written.
now if we use pass thru transmit pipe line at send side, how and when does the message context get removed from the message?? Since pass thru does not have any stages/components, how does the message context removed and sent out a pure message to destination???
i mean what exactly happens here to remove the context??
Ravindar

Thanks for the reply.
"The Context is created by the Adapter, regardless of any Pipeline or Pipeline Component. It has nothing to do with PassThrough vs. XmlReceive, although XmlReceive will write Promoted Properties to the existing Context,
as can any other Component."
yeah yeah, adapter does create some properties in context. You are right, i am aware of it. I just missed to explain it clearly. what i meant is addition of context properties will not happen if pass thru used. Thanks its clear.
"No. The Context already exists on the Message when it comes from the MessageBox and
is equally available to any Component in any Stage. The Context that hits the Pipeline is whatever was last Persisted, either by a Receive Port or Orchestration. It is not created by the XmlAssembler (XmlTransmit)"
You are right , the context already exists on the message while it leaves the receive port, and once it persists
to message box the context and message context gets stored in messages in relative tables.
Now as you said the components get the message from the last persistence, assume i have a send port(with passthru)
subscriber and a orchestration subsrciber for this message.
Orchestration gets the message with context right!!
if the send sendport(with passthru) also gets message along with context, then where is this context removed/demoted
while sending it out?. i guess as per SAAkhlaq said,
here sendport(with passthru) should get a pure message without context as passthru used.
or is it that ultimately send adapter removes the context completely?
or is it something like biztalk run time load the context from database into cache and both orchestration and send port gets pure message, and if needed they use context from cache???
sorry i may be troubling you, but i am confused. i hope i am not creating any nuisance with this
post.
Ravindar

Sending EDI To Multiple Partners Using Single Send Port in Orchestration

Hi Guys,
I am having a scenario where i am receiving a Xml(which can be in between 11-15). I am having 150 Trading Partners with whom these datsets have to be shared. Now every Trading partner is having there own character Sets and unique numbers so i have created 150
party agreements for all the Trading partners. I am interested to use a single port. I have created an orchestration to achieve this. Below are the steps i used to create orchestration :-
1) Receiving 11 XML from receive shape.
2) Extracting the value of Node TSP(this value is used to know the trading partners unique number on which i am deciding to which party agreement this Xml needs to go) using xpath.
3) I am constructing the message in construct.
3.1) Mapping from XML To EDI.
3.2) As all 11 datasets are having different version. So i am overidding the value ISA and GS in Message Assignment(SourceName).
4) Decide shape to decide on the value of TSP to which port it has to be send.
But according to me this is not an optimized solution. Below are reasons:-
1) I have to create 150 branch into decide shape. As i am receiving 11 different Xml messages i need to create decide shape for all the different Xml messages.
2) I have to create 150 different ports which are having 15 operation(depanding upon Xml we received).
Note:- I have to create 150 different Send Ports only because of Party Agreement. So is there any solution? i only want Single Send port and i can select the party Agreement in the orchestrations.

Duplicate thread. See:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/c12a377e-ccf6-4fbe-9986-14da63d72282/sending-edi-to-multiple-partners-using-single-send-port-in-orchestration?forum=biztalkgeneral

ACK/NACK Handling In Biztalk 2010 Orchestration - SFTP send port

Hi,
I am using SFTP adapter and wants to get ACK/NACK in orchestration. I have implemented all the required steps mentioned in the below blog:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/kevinsmi/archive/2004/07/03/172574.aspx
I am getting the ACKs, but in case of failure I do not get any NACK. Does anyone know how to get it ?
Thanks,
Iqra

SFTP adapter doesn't have any configuration property to get the acknowledgement.
To get the ack/nack you have to let the BizTalk engine with the property “BTS.AckRequired”
set to true. With Orchestration this property can be set by enabling Delivery Notification
to Transmitted.
The DeliveryFailureNotification is typically only used for one-way send port not for solicit-response port. Following article can guide you on Delivery notification
in Orchestration.
http://kentweare.blogspot.co.uk/2007/11/biztalk-delivery-notification.html
Along with the other obviously settings for delivery notifications in orchestration, also set the
Send-Port’s retry to zero (0). This setting is most overseen by many.
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

Send port filter and Orchestration binding priority

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for