SendAndLoad data retrieved, but unevaluatable

Hello all, sorry if this is a repeat, I did not find a
similar post in an 1/2 hour of searching
I'm using sendAndLoad, everything seems to work fine in that
I get all my variables and can trace them and put them in text
fields. When I try to evaluate them or convert them to numbers, its
like they're not even there.
If anyone with any experience with this could explain what
I'm doing wrong I will be permanently indebted to you.
See code below:

The statusID comes in as a string (the only datatype you can
receive this way). If you want to evaluate it as a number you have
to cast it to a number. I've put together a script for you to test
so you can follow what is happening with the incoming var statusID.
Now I test this very simple with a text file but you can test it
with your CF.

Similar Messages

Query Error Information: Result set is too large; data retrieval ......

Hi Experts,
I got one problem with my query information. when Im executing my report and drill my info in my navigation panel, Instead of a table with values the message "Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration" appears. I already applied "Note 1127156 - Safety belt: Result set is too large". I imported Support Package 13 for SAP NetWeaver 7. 0 BI Java (BIIBC13_0.SCA / BIBASES13_0.SCA / BIWEBAPP13_0.SCA) and executed the program SAP_RSADMIN_MAINTAIN (in transaction SE38), with the object and the value like Note 1127156 says... but the problem still appears....
what Should I be missing ?????? How can I fix this issue ????
Thank you very much for helping me out..... (Any help would be rewarded)
David Corté

You may ask your basis guy to increase ESM buffer (rsdb/esm/buffersize_kb). Did you check the systems memory?
Did you try to check the error dump using ST22 - Runtime error analysis?
Edited by: ashok saha on Feb 27, 2008 10:27 PM

WAD : Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration

Hi All,
When trying to execute the web template by giving less restiction we are getting the below error :
Result set is too large; data retrieval restricted by configuration
Result set too large (758992 cells); data retrieval restricted by configuration (maximum = 500000 cells)
But when we try to increase the number of restictions it is giving output. For example if we give fiscal period, company code ann Brand we are able to get output. But if we give fical period alone it it throwing the above error.
Note : We are in SP18.
Whether do we need to change some setting in configuration? If we yes where do we need to change or what else we need to do to remove this error
Regards
Karthik

Hi Karthik,
the standard setting for web templates is to display a maximum amount of 50.000 cells. The less you restrict your query the more data will be displayed in the report. If you want to display more than 50.000 cells the template will not be executed correctly.
In general it is advisable to restrict the query as much as possible. The more data you display the worse your performance will be. If you have to display more data and you execute the query from query designer or if you use the standard template you can individually set the maximum amount of cells. This is described over [here|Re: Bex Web 7.0 cells overflow].
However I do not know if (and how) you can set the maximum amount of cells differently as a default setting for your template. This should be possible somehow I think, if you find a solution for this please let us know.
Brgds,
Marcel

Real tough data retrieval - assistance needed

Late 2011 Macbook Pro with 500GB hard drive
Lion 10.7
One morning out of absolutely nowhere I get this grey screen with a flashing question mark folder. I take it to the geniuses at the Apple store and they tell me my hard drive has failed (no explanation). My mac is under warranty so they gave me a new hard drive for free, bagged my old hard drive and told me "good luck" retrieving the data.
I'm on a mission to retrieve the data without paying for services. I have never retrieved data before but I've been doing a lot of forum reading and I have been getting protips from an IT friend who has saved my PC data before.
As of now, I have been unable to even access the hard drive and so I am reaching out to the community to help me conquer this project.
the problem is not the OS (according to Apple store)
when hooking up with the dongle, neither Finder nor Disk Utility detect the bad drive
the drive will spin when forced by the dongle (so I've ruled out the freezer method)
I was advised (by friends and forums alike) to download so powerful data retrieval software:
Data Rescue [did not detect bad external drive]
Disk Drill [did not detect bad external drive]
TestDisk (http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk) [I can get it up and running but I have no idea how to use this software]
So that seems to be the big problem, when I hook up my failed drive as an external hard drive, there is no acknowledgement from my MBP that it is connected and as such data recovery programs cannot access it. When I still had it installed in my computer, there was no clicking sound and it doesn't seem like any of the components are jammed up as it still spins.
Where do I go from here? Please keep in mind that I am new to resolving my own technical problems but I'm willing to learn. Tired of being one of those people who look at computer parts and get anxious.
NOTE: I haven't tried Target Mode as I do not have a firewire cable or access to another mac (yet). If you think I should try this, please let me know.

A hard drive that will not divulge BOTH its Make&Model and a reasonable size/capacity to the likes of Disk Utility and data rescue programs has died, and connot be repaired with any software.
Target Disk mode will not improve anything. The drive is read as a Mac Volume by software. If it won't mount under Mac OS X, it won't mount under Target Disk Mode.

Should I use a data retrieval service or software to recover data ?

Please pardon the length of this post.
Here's the setup for our office:
Computer 1:
10.4.8 OS X
1 GHZ PowerPC G4: silver grey tower, grey apple
1MB L3 Cache
256 MB DDR SDRAM
Computer 2:
10.4.8 OS X
Dual 450 MHZ PowerPC G4: blue grey tower, blue apple
256 MB SDRAM
Computer 3:
10.4.8 OS X
1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen:
256 MB DDR SDRAM
I have 2 LaCie Big Disk d2 Extremes daisy chained and connected to the IMac. We use the first to store all of our data to keep our local disks free. The second d2 is the backup to the first. The other 2 computers connect to the d2's via an ethernet hub. The d2's are each partitioned into 4 compartments.
A couple of days ago I started the system up when I got in in the morning, and the main d2 would not open. I ran disk utility, but it said that the drive was damaged beyond it's ability to repair. I ran DiskWarrior, and it gave me this message:
"The directory of disk 'G4' cannot be rebuilt. The disk was not modified. The original directory is too severely damaged. It appears another disk utility has erased critical directory information. (3004, 2176)."
I contacted Disk Warrior tech support and after a series of exchanges that had me send him dated extracted from the terminal function, he said this:
"It appears that the concatenated RAID inside your LaCie
drive has failed (your 500GB drive is actually 2 250GB
hard drives). That is why we only saw 2 partitions
on "disk3". A possible cause could be a failed bridge
in the case.
You may be looking at sending this drive to a data recovery service.
However, it is possible that we may be able to recover data
from the partitions that we CAN see. What we would be doing would cause no damage to your data
unless the hard drives were having a mechanical failure (ie, the
head crashed and was contacting the platters, similar to scratching
a record). But from what I've seen, I don't feel that is the case.
I believe the piece of hardware that 'bridges' the two drives to
make them act as one has failed. that's why we can only see data
about 1 of the 2 drives in the case.
We would only be attempting to gather data off the drive. Since
data recovery services sometimes charge for amount of data retrieved,
it's up to you how you want to proceed."
Most of the data from the past 5 years for our business stands at being lost. Only some of it had been properly backed up on the second drive, due to some back up software issues. I want to do whatever I can to retrieve all of, or at least some of the data. From what the Alsoft technician said, do you think that the data recovery software available to the consumer is going to be robust enough to retrieve at least the data from the one disk in the drive that is recognizable (there are 2 250gig disks in the d2X. Only one is responding at all). If so, do these Softwares further damage the disks? Or should I just send the drive to a data recovery service?
I'd like to try to extract some of it myself via over the counter retrieval software, but I don't know whether to trust these programs?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Peter McConnell
1 GHZ PowerPC G4 IMac Flat Screen Mac OS X (10.4.8) Posted

Peter
My 2 cents:
I have used FileSalvage
http://www.subrosasoft.com/OSXSoftware/index.php?mainpage=product_info&productsid=1
to recover files from damaged disks. It works as advertised, within limits. Some files may be too damaged to recover. More importantly yo get to scan the disk before actually recovering, and it will give you a list of what it thinks it can recover.
My experience was that it recovered approx 85% of the data.
YMMV but they do have a trial.
Regards
TD

Report Developed in Webi Rich Client Consuming more time in Data Retrieval

Dear All,
I am a BO Consultant, recently in my project I have developed one report in Webi Rich Client., at the time of development and subsequent days the report was working fine (taking Data Retrieval time less than 1 minute), but after some days its taking much time (increasing day by day and now its taking more than 11 minutes).
Can anybody point out what could be the reason?????
We are using,
1. SAP BI 7.0
2. SAP BO XI 3.1 Edge
3. Webi Rich Client Version :12.3.0 and Build 601
This report is made on a Multiprovider (Sales).
What are the important points that should be considered so that we can improve the performance of Webi Reports????
Waiting for a suitable solution.....................
Regards,
Arun Krishnan.G
SAP BO Consultant
Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 3:50 PM

Hi,
Please come back here with a copy/paste of the 2 MDX statements from the MDA.log to compare the good/bad runtimes.
& the 2 equivalent DPCOMMANDS clauses (good and bad) from the WebI trace logs.
Can u explain what u really mean in the bold text above..................Actually I didn't get you..........
Pardon, I have only 3 months experience in BO.
Regards,
Arun
Edited by: ArunKG on Oct 11, 2011 4:28 PM

Data retrieval for Sony handycam with 60G harddrive.

Does BestBuy do data retrieval? I have a handycam with work video on it that accidentaly got formated. I know with a standard harddrive you can still retrieve it if there has not been recording since the formatting but I am not sure about camera harddrives. If BestBuy does not do it, does anyone know where it can be done and approximate cost. I live in the New Orleans area.
I may try the same question in computers if nobody knows. Thanks in advance for any guidance at all.

Best Buy sends out for data retrieval. You can have it sent out through geek squad to get the estimate of cost.
Crystal
Superuser
Forum Guidelines | Terms & Conditions | Community Guidelines | What is a Superuser?
*Remember to mark your questions solved and click the star to give kudos to show your thanks!*
While I used to be a Best Buy Employee, I no longer have any affiliation with Best Buy.
My opinions do not in any way shape or form represent Best Buy's Official decisions.

Data Retrieval speed from DIAdem Database using Data Finder Toolkit in LabVIEW

I have developed a LabVIEW code using NI Data Finder toolkit for extracting the data from the DIAdem. I have formed queries for extraction the data. But the data retrieval takes more time for extracting the data.
I have attached my LabVIEW code image along with this post. In that i have circled the VI "Results to Waveform", which is Data Finder toolkit VI which takes more time for extraction. From my Testing, query formation is taking only few millisecond to execute, but "Results to Waveform.vi" takes around 35 seconds. Also i want to execute similar kind of search for 5 times. Altogether it will taken around 1.5 mins to 2 mins for execution.
Is there any other alternative way of doing this search? Kindly help me in sorting this out.
Thanks,
Alagar
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
Report Gen.JPG ‏91 KB

Hi Alagar,
You say that the "Results to Waveform.vi" takes "more" time, but what are you comparing this to? More than what? More than loading the contents of the same file with the TDMS VIs or with the Storage VIs? What file format are you loading data from after querying-- TDMS files, ASCII files, binary files?
What information do you want to retrieve? Do you really need ALL the values of ALL the channels in each data file? Are you interested only in the channel values, or all you interested in scalar properties stored along with the data? If you want only some of the channels loaded or if you want only scalar properties loaded, there are indeed faster ways of doing this.
Brad Turpin
DIAdem Product Support Engineer
National Instruments

My macbook pro is still under warranty. I have just put it into Mac 1 to be repaired because I had the folder with the dreaded Question mark on it....new hard drive. I was told that if I wanted my data retrieved, I would have to pay $445 p/h. Ahh!!!

My macbook pro is still under warranty. I have just put it into Mac 1 to be repaired because I had the folder with the dreaded Question mark on it....new hard drive. I was told that if I wanted my data retrieved, I would have to pay $445 p/h. Ahh!!! Shouldn't that be covered by warranty?

My newest Mac just did the same "folder of death" dance. It's too late for you now, but you might consider a passport backup drive.You can get 2&3 T-bytes now fairly reasonably priced. A given with computers is they will crash, just a question of how bad and when, so you can be prepared for the next time.

Multi server data retrieval performance

Hi experts,
I have a question regarding the data retrieval performance (EVDRE) on a multi server installation environment on Microsoft SQL Server 2008.
We have succesfully migrated Outlooksoft 4.2 SP03 to SAP BPC 7.0 SP07 for a customer. During this project we have also set up a complete new server environment consisting of:
Development server: dedicated single server, Windows 2003 Standard SP2 32 bit, SQL Server 2008 SP1 with cumulative update package 6, SAP BPC 7.0 SP07, 2 quad core processors, 4 GB RAM
QA server: dedicated multi servers - 1 database server (SQL/OLAP), Windows 2003 Standard SP2 64 bit, SQL Server 2008 SP1 with cumulative update package 6, 2 quad core processors, 32 GB RAM - 1 dedicated application/web server, Windows 2003 Standard SP2 32 bit, SQL Server 2008 SP1 with cumulative update package 6 (shared components / reporting services), SAP BPC 7.0 SP07, 2 quad core processors, 4 GB RAM
Production server: dedicated multi servers - 1 database server (SQL/OLAP/Reporting services), Windows 2003 Standard SP2 64 bit, SQL Server 2008 SP1 with cumulative update package 6, 2 quad core processors, 32 GB RAM - 2 dedicated application/web server, Windows 2003 Standard SP2 32 bit, SQL Server 2008 SP1 with cumulative update package 6 (shared components), SAP BPC 7.0 SP07, 2 quad core processors, 4 GB RAM
Furthermore, two terminal servers with the SAP BPC client.
All servers have good performancve and we have great times on cube processing and SQL processing. However, to our great surprise we find that the single development server is much faster with a single user to retrieve data using EVDRE than the multi-server environment. About 2x as fast. A reporting book with more then 10 sheets and about 25 EVDRE's takes about 42 seconds on the development server and 93 seconds on the multi server.
It seems that EVDRE is taking up a lot of time to communicate between the application server and the database server in a multi server environment while being much faster on a single server. This is not what we want :-). The network speed in the domain consist of all 1 GB lines so that should not be the issue.
Do you have any experience with this? How can we upgrade the speed of the multi server, are there specific settings?
Hope the get some useful answers. Thanks in advance.
Damien
Edited by: DWiegman on Feb 20, 2010 4:15 PM

Hi,
   You have to activate also the EVDRE logs on the client and server level, just to understand from where is coming the problem (appserver-db comuncication or client-appserver communication). You have to check also if there is any proxy firewall between client and application server.
    In case you are using NLB, please verify if afinity is setup to true.
    The performance problems can be come from db level. Did you verify how many records do you have into WB table for the specific application? Are you keeping the DB in full mode? How big is the log of the databse?
    The are a lot of things that can have impact of this, but it looks to be a setup problem.
Hope this can help you,
Mihaela

IR webclient: error when uncompressing data retrieved: *Data Error*!

A small (?) number of IR webclient 931 installations we notice the next error when processing: " error when uncompressing data retrieved: *Data Error*! " It does not seem to be user or permission/provision related.
Does anyone have an idea how to solve it. Reinstalling the IR webclient does not solve it.

Hi there, I got to the point where I found the cause, but now I still need to solve it. perhaps anyone can give me a hint.
931 bqy's are stored on server as zip files. (although they are renamed as *.1) On 832 they were stored as bqy files (although they were renamed to *.1 too).
The clients which had the error message tried to open their 931 documents with the 832 plugin. Which does not have the capebility to uncompress the .1 file. In that perspective is the error message very obvious.
We need to run both 832 intelligence plugin and the 931 webclient on the same client.
How can we force that the corrcet version is used for openeing the docs?

Data Retrieval from SSRS 2008 R2 to SQL Server 2012 standard

Hello,
We have a virtual machine running SSRS 2008 R2 and a physical server running SQL server 2012 standard. We are having an issue with a report that is taking almost 10 minutes for the data to be retrieved from the sql 2012 database. We used the
execution logging query to debug and analyze. We see that it renders and processes very fast, but the data retrieval time is very slow. When the same query is run using sql studio mgr. from the SSRS server it runs just fine...it
takes seconds for the results to come up.
I don't believe there is a compatibilty issue because other reports run fine. We're just having problems with one report.

A long shot, but I've seen where the data type of a report parameter is mismatched against the data type of the table it is being compared against. SQL profiler would show this clearly.
This would explain why the query returns quickly in ssms but not with the report.

Data retrieval from failed ibook hard drive

my ibook G4's hard drive failed after about 18 months, which is ridiculous in itself. they tell me i have to send it off somewhere for data retrieval.
WHERE is a good place to do this? i need the data.

Hey Christopher.
Have you already removed the HD?
Do you have access to another Mac where you could try Target Disk Mode ? It may be worth a try and shouldn't cost you a thing.
If you are willing to buy some software, Alsoft's DiskWarrior has helped crack some pretty tough looking jobs.
If your drive has not completely failed either one of these may work. Target Disk Mode is worth a try as it won't cost you a thing but time.
Edit: As Ryan M said, in the future backup...backup....backup.....backup.

Data retrieval from sad face ipod

So, two nights ago my ipod (40gig 3rd gen(? 4th? 1.5 years old; warranty expired)) randomly died while in the middle of playing music. It whirred and clicked and eventually gave me the unhappy face, and that is how it's stayed for the past 48 hours. Now, there are plenty of people in this same boat, as a little browsing of the forums has showed me, so I'm not asking for how to possibly fix it, but...
What I do want to know: is there a service to get the data off the ipod? Reformatting the machine is all fine and good, but I'm living abroad and most of my CDs are currently on the other side of the world. My friend said that you could pay $50 for Apple to retrieve the data from your old drive, but I haven't seen anything like that on the website (perhaps it is only for Macs?)
Anyway, has anyone heard of a data retrieval service for ipods, or some other method of getting data off an ipod that won't connect to the computer? (I tried putting it in data mode and it just laughed at me...or frowned, I suppose.)
Thanks for any advice you can give...
Windows XP

Is your iPod fully charged? (connect it to the Mac for 4 hours to charge the battery)
Your post is not very clear on the problem, but normally Resetting the iPod will get rid of the sad face, on the iPod sceen, but may not get rid of your unhappy face.
To Reset - Press Menu and Center Button for about 10 secs till the Apple logo comes ON.
Here is the support document that may help you.
http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1373?viewlocale=en_US
Good Luck & Have a nice day!

Data retrieval from ZL table

I need to retrieve data from ZL table and prepare a report comparing the Actual, Previous and Old records in the table for an employee for a particular period.
Are there any particular function modules for this data retrieval?
Thanks.

Hi bala,
I did not get what you were trying to tell me. I went to SE37 and tried for anything that starts with "zlit" .. but returned no results.
And also I dont want time management to payroll.
I want to retrieve data from the B2 in PCL2 cluster.
i.e I want to retrieve data from the ZL table in the cluster for a particular payperiod and particular employee.
Thanks very much in advance!

SendAndLoad data retrieved, but unevaluatable

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for