Sequences in Palnning with mutiple Plan types

Running on Planning 9.3.1, and having the Load Balancing structure.
Trying to create a Sequence should run the Business rules, as each HBR should run on different Plan types. Surley I need to Merge the variables of RTPs. Is there any work around way. Can anybody share their experince on this if you already come across of this scenario.
Edited by: 798780 on Sep 12, 2011 9:04 AM

Thansk Abhishek,
Yes, that is the issue. If we hide only the databases and remain RTPs we need to enter multiple times even though they are similar ones. And also, cannot compromise the Load Balancing as we cannot give mutiple locations. I am not sure if we can have any work around.

Similar Messages

A structure with mutiple data types or array of array

I want to read some soft of a table from a text file and want to store in a structure (not in database) for future use. I want the structure to have rows and columns when I need to reach. Colums should store multiple data types (int and/or string). I have examined Collections that only store one data type and only one dimension. I need a structure that holds multiple datatypes and at least 2 dimension. In short I need array of array? Any example or suggestion?

Here is the colection part. But I cound not get it finished. Stuck at getting data from collection.. How could I read from the collection
    public static Long ReadFromFile() {
        List liste = new ArrayList();
        try {
            FileReader file = new FileReader ("abc.txt");
            BufferedReader buffer = new BufferedReader (file);
            String line = "";
            int i = 0;
            while ((line = buffer.readLine())!= null) {
                if (i>0) {
                    DataS kontrol = new DataS();
                    String [] temp = null;
                    temp = line.split("\t");
                    for (int j=0; j< temp.length; j++) {
                        if (j== 0 && StrUtil.ValidNumber(temp[0])>0 ) {
                            kontrol.set_C_id(temp[0]);
                        } else if (j== 1) {
                            kontrol.set_C_enabled(temp[1]);
                        } else if (j== 2) {
                            kontrol.set_C_table(temp[2]);
                        } else if (j== 3) {
                            kontrol.set_C_field(temp[3]);
                        } else if (j== 4) {
                            kontrol.set_C_xmlobjectname(temp[4]);
                        } else if (j== 5) {
                            kontrol.set_C_xmlsubobjectname(temp[5]);
                        } else if (j== 6 && StrUtil.ValidNumber(temp[6])>0 ) {
                            kontrol.set_C_controltype(temp[6]);
                        } else if (j== 7) {
                            kontrol.set_C_datatype(temp[7]);
                        } else if (j== 8 && StrUtil.ValidNumber(temp[8])>0 ) {
                            kontrol.set_C_datalength(temp[8]);
                        } else if (j== 9 && StrUtil.ValidNumber(temp[9])>0 ) {
                            kontrol.set_C_dl(temp[9]);
                        } else if (j== 10) {
                            kontrol.set_C_conditionop(temp[10]);
                        } else if (j== 11) {
                            kontrol.set_C_conditionval(temp[11]);
                    liste.add(kontrol);
                i++;
                buffer.close();
        catch (IOException e) {
            return Long.valueOf(-1);
        /*For reading test*/
        try{
            DataS stored_kontrol = new DataS();
            Iterator itr = liste.iterator();
            int i = 0 ;
            while(itr.hasNext()) {
                //Object obj = itr.getClass();
                // Here were I stuck... How can I read from collection which is filled with object
        } catch (Exception e) {
            return Long.valueOf(-1);
        return Long.valueOf(1);
    }

How to create dynamic calc account in multi-plan type application

Hi expert,
I have a planning application with 3 plan types.
I created a calculation script which fixed on accounts in plan type 1 only and the calculation suppose to calculate a "dynamiccalc" account with a member formula attached. Everytime I run the script, it takes very long time and I found there are sessions at the back of essbase with "Process local xref/xwrite request" request to other plan types.
It does not has this kind of session if I change the account to "store".
Would like to check, is it possible to create a dynamic calc account to calculate for only 1 plan type in a multi-plan type application? Is there any special setting that I need to do to enable this? I already selected source plan type as Plan type 1 for my dynamic calc account. Please help!
Many thanks!!
My HP application is on version 11.1.2.1.

Hi Jake,
Thanks for pointing out the check box. Overlooked it and the checkbox was not unchecked, even I only wanted the account to exist in 1 of the plan type.
However, after I unchecked and refresh now, when I run the calc script, it still trigger process at the back to the other 2 plan types with "Process local xref/xwrite request" request. What else could I have missed?
I already added the "HSP_Nolink" UDA to all accounts in plan type 2 and plan type 3 and confirmed that there's no account with "Xref" member formula, I really don't know why it is trying to process local xref request. Can anyone help??
Many thanks!!!

Can we add more plan type to EPMA or Classic planning App once deployed.

Hello Gurus,
I have EPMA planning application ABC with two plan types enabled i.e Plan1 and Plan2. Application is already in deployed stat. so now is it possible to enable more plan types for same application.
All help is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Yash

once gain thanks for the quick reply, it was really helpful.
and just for curiosity same applies for classic application?
Thanks
Yash

Error regarding plan type in hyperion planning

Hi,
I have created a hyperion planning application with 2 plan types namely Plan1 and Plan2.
Initially i designed my every dimension members in Plan1 alone. Product dimension (User defined dimension) is alone in both the plan type.
Now if i go to the edit properties of all other dimensions except my user defined dimension i could not enable the Plan2 in the plan type.
Can anyone give me suggestions to enable the Plan2 for other dimensions.

Hi ,
You cannot modify in front end if you deployed your application already. You can enable if you have Workforce or Capex cube created in you application.
you cant do it for for the normal cube (Plan1, Plan2, Plan3).
Regards,
Vikram.

Provisioning varying admin access levels by Planning plan types

How can I provision admin access levels by plan types? For example, I'd like to grant a user full admin access to one plan type, but limit their access for another plan type within the same application? The plan type I want to limit them to is basically a workforce plan type which I do not want to allow them to have any admin access to. Anyone know how to do this?

I took a look at the blog and my current setup design mostly follows what is on the blog. I too have a workforce plan type along with other plan types in the Planning application. What I'm trying to see if it's possible is to setup a user with admin access to manage and modify the member outlines for 2 out of the 3 plan types in Planning, but not give him access to the workforce plan type as that has sensitive compensation information. But it appears that if he's granted admin access to modify the application outline, then he would be able to grant himself access to the workforce members, which then means I can't provision him with limited admin rights while also preventing him from access to the workforce information.

When i run a sequence with ivi step types in simulation mode i get the error code number BFFA0015 - Types do not match.

When i run the sequence with ivi step types in simulation mode i get the error Types do not mathc. The step that generates this error is an IviScope step type and is configured as a measurement. Th weird thing is that in real mode is working perfectly. I have three measure steps and i get the error in all of them. The exact error message is:
UUT Result: Error, Error executing substep 'Post'. An exception occurred calling 'RunStep' in 'ISubstep' of 'TestStand Ivi Step Types 1.0 Type Library' An error occurred while executing the step. Component Works IVI Control Error: The IVI Read operation failed on channel '1' for logical name 'SampleScope'. Details: (1
) Types do not match. [IVI Error Code: BFFA0015] Source: TSIviStepTypes [Error Code: -30721, User-defined error code.]
Can someone tell me how to fix this problem?. It seems to me that the simulation generates a diferent type of measurement of that generated in real mode.

Update:
The simulation driver appears to be raising the error. By switching to specific driver simulation the error does not occur. This may be a problem in either the class simulation driver or the specific driver.
Scott Richardson
National Instruments

Credit card number change, your company can not charge , so , what can I do ?because I buy one year plan , but the plan stop already ,I can not change the credit card details.So, I need to buy one more year or can continous the paln with changing the cre

credit card number change, your company can not charge , so , what can I do ?because I buy one year plan ,
but the plan stop already ,I can not change the credit card details.
So, I need to buy one more year or can continous the paln with changing the credit number?

Hello pen pang,
if your Photoshop is a part of Creative Cloud you can use "Manage your membership and payments|Creative Cloud" at
http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/membership-subscription-troubleshooting- creative-cloud.html >>>
Payment & credit card >>> Help changing the credit card on your account >>> from there see what hints are listed.
On the other hand I'm sure that you can use the recommended procedure with a "normal" PS too.
If necessary and for further questions click through http://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html and if "open" please use the chat, I had the best experiences. I quote from Adobe's employee Preran: The chat button is activated as soon as there is an agent available to help.
If you need these explanations in another language, please use "Change" at the end/bottom of the website from above
Good luck!
Hans-Günter

Issue with plan type...

Hi Guys,
Unfortunately, I have clicked the "initialize workforce" command in planning webclient (v.9.2). Workforce plan type had been created. If I delete plan type now, What are implications i will see. please suggest me what to do.
Advance many Thanks,

To disable Workforce:
- Edit the HSP_SystemCfg table in the application relational DB and change the values of the following fields to the given respective values. Before updating the table ensure that database backup is there to restore from in case there is a need to do so.
- MODULE_SUPPORTED to 7
- MODULE_ENABLED to 7
- WF_KEY to NULL
- WF_OPTIONS to 0
- Go to the registry.properties usually located in C:\Hyperion\common\config and comment out the following line:
- PLANNING_WRKFORCEPLNG_OPT=false,false
This property is application specific and not user specific.
Cheers,
Jasmine.

One BR to copy data in two plan type

Hi, I encountered this problem with the business rules.
In order to run the what-if scenario analysis, I would like to be able to copy the data from one version to another version using a business rule. However, currently I have two plan type within one planning application. And I have to use two business rules (with run-time prompt) to make the data copy. The run-time prompt for the 2 BRs are the same, for example, same entity, samel copy-from version, and same copy-to version.
I would like the users to just run one business rules (or maybe a sequence) with one set of RTPs to choose, and it allows them to copy both plan type. I have tried to use the sequence, but it seems that the sequence would require the 2 sets of RTPs to be input.
Any advice is appreciated.
THANKS

Alp,
Yes. I have tried to use the global variables, with the BR sequence. However, since the two BRs are for two different plan type (essbase cubes), when I choose the merge variable option, it did merge the global variable, and also limit the database name selection to one. (I can not choose the "hide" for the database).
Any other suggestion?
Thanks

How to create a macro for a planning type in MC8b transaction

Hi,
I am presently working for a product allocation demand, which have a information structiure with characteristic and key field.
the characteristic are production allocation quantity, incoming order quantity, and open order quantity.
i have created a planning type in which the data updation takes from the excel file to the planning type in mc95.
but i need to create a macro for this planning type .
can any body give the details information how to create a Macro for a planning type.
Thanks and regards
GopalKrishna

Dear Gopal
May be the link would be helpful to you.
[Planning Types and Macros|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/a5/631cc443a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm]
Drill down the left tab once you opened the link, for more information.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Purchase Order with Invoice Plan

Hi,
I need to understand working with Invoicing plans for a Purchase Order. Especially the service PO for the rents and other related services.
How the PO is linked to the Invoice Plan and how the process happens in SAP?
Thanks in advance!

Creating an Invoicing Plan
The following procedure describes how to create an invoicing plan with the pre-Enjoy ordering transactions (ME21, ME22, ME23).
The procedure described is also applicable u2013 with certain restrictions u2013 to the Enjoy purchase order (ME21N, ME22N, ME23N).
If you are using the Enjoy purchase order, you will find:
·         The Invoicing Plan button and the indicators for GR-based invoice verification (GR-Based IV), service-based invoice verification (Srv.-Based IV), evaluated receipt settlement (ERS), and invoice receipt (Inv. Receipt) among the item details on the Invoice tab page.
·         The account assignment among the item details on the Account Assignment tab page
·         The Goods Receipt and GR Non-Valuatedindicators among the item details on the Delivery tab page
Prerequisites
Vendor Master Record
Before you can use the invoicing plan with automatic settlement, the Evaluated Receipt Settlement Delivery indicator must be set on the Purchasing Data screen in the vendor master record.
(If you wish to enter invoicing dates manually, this is not necessary.)
Purchase Order
●     We recommend using a framework order (that is a purchase order with a validity period and a reason for rejection). The invoicing plan can adopt the validity period specified in the PO header.
●     PO items for which you wish to use an invoicing plan must have account assignment irrespective of whether a material with a master record, a material described by a short text, or an external service is involved.
●     The GR/IR control facility must be set up in such a way that no goods receipt (or, in the case of services, no service entry) is expected - only an incoming invoice. If you wish to have automatic settlement, you must also set the Evaluated Receipt Settlement indicator.
If you nevertheless wish to allow service entry sheets for the item (e.g. for information purposes only), you must set the GR Non-Val. indicator.
Customizing
Under Purchase Order à Invoicing Plan in Customizing for Purchasing, you can maintain data such as the desired invoicing plan types, date categories, and date descriptions.
Procedure
       1.      Create a purchase order with account assignment (framework order).
Click to access the item overview (or the overview of service lines if you chose item category D for services).
       2.      Enter the desired material or service, the quantity, and the price.
       3.      Select the desired item and click Account Assignments to access the account assignment screen. Enter the account assignment for this item.
       4.      Click to access the item detail screen. Check that the GR/IR control indicators are set correctly on the item detail screen.
○     The GR and GR-Based Invoice Verification or Service-Based Invoice Verification indicators must not be set.
○     IR must be set.
○     You must set ERS if you wish to have Evaluated Receipt Settlement.
○     If you wish to have service entry sheets purely for information, for example, allow non-valuated goods receipt (i.e. select the GR Non-Val and GR indicators).
       5.      Choose Item ® Invoicing Plan. A window appears, in which the invoicing plan types predefined in Customizing are suggested. Choose the desired invoicing plan type and click Continue.
You can use the following invoicing plan types:
○     Periodic Invoicing Plan
■      You use the periodic invoicing plan if the total value of the PO item is to be invoiced in each period.
■      The system creates the invoicing dates automatically on the basis of the settings in Customizing.
■      The invoicing date and the amount to be invoiced are shown for each settlement period (e.g. month). In the case of the periodic invoicing plan, the amount represents the total value of the PO item.
■      You can change the suggested dates and block individual dates for automatic invoicing if necessary.
■      You can enter the start and end dates for the invoicing plan.
■      With the Dates from and Dates to fields, you can determine that an invoicing plan does not contain invoicing dates extending over the entire validity period of the purchase order but only for a certain period within that validity period. (E.g. within a validity period from 1.1. to 12.31, only dates within the period 1.1. to 06.30.)
■      With the Horizon field, you control how far into the future dates can be created. If you enter a date rule that adds six months to the current date here, invoicing dates will be created for just half a year in advance in each case.
The system automatically creates new dates if you change the invoicing plan or when you invoke the transaction for Updating Periodic Invoicing Plans. See Generating Further Invoicing Plan Dates
■      The In Advance indicator allows you to specify whether the invoice is to be created with regard to a prior or subsequent period. (E.g. at the beginning of February, either in advance for the month of February or in arrears for the month of January).
■      In addition, fields with information on the existing invoicing plan are displayed (e.g. the calendar upon which the date determination process is based).
○     Partial Invoicing Plan
■      You use the partial invoicing plan if the total value of the PO item is to be invoiced in several partial amounts.
■      You get an empty date overview in which you can manually enter the desired dates.
■      If you work with a reference invoicing plan, the system automatically generates dates in accordance with the reference plan.
You have the following options:
●      You create a reference invoicing plan in Customizing for the invoicing plan type.
●      You enter an existing invoicing plan as reference plan directly in the invoicing plan for the PO item.
■      You can flag a date in field B (Billing/Invoicing Rule) as follows:
●      As a down payment (percentage or value)
●      As an invoicing date (percentage or value)
●      As a final invoice
       6.      Click to return to the item overview.
       7.      Click to save the purchase order item with the invoicing plan.
You can then start the automatic invoice creation process during invoice verification.
For more information, refer to the section Settlement of Amounts Due Under Invoicing Plans.
Once assigned to an item, the invoicing plan type (e.g. partial invoicing plan) cannot be changed. If you wish to assign a different invoicing plan type, you must delete the item and create a new one.
Generating Further Invoicing Plan Dates
If you have assigned a periodic invoicing plan to a PO item but have not initially defined invoicing dates covering the entire validity period of the purchase order, you can generate further dates in due course.
You have created a PO item with a periodic invoicing plan for a certain planned procurement. The purchase order is valid from 1.1. to 12.31. When creating the invoicing plan, you specified one invoicing date per month for the first half of the year. You have not yet planned any dates for the second half of the year because you do not wish information from the invoicing plan to be passed on to purchase order commitments at this stage, for example.
By mid-June, it is clear that the PO is to proceed as envisaged, and you therefore wish to schedule invoicing dates for the remainder of its validity period.
Procedure
To schedule further invoicing dates, proceed as follows:
Choose Purchase order ® Follow-on functions ® Period. invoicing plan
Specify the purchase orders for which invoicing dates are to be generated in the invoicing plan and perform the function.
A log can be created if desired.
Result
The system adds further dates on the basis of information such as the validity period or horizon from Customizing, the purchase order, and the invoicing plan.
regards,
indranil

ORA-19007 when coping a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the

ORA-19007 when coping a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the same database.
Hi all,
When I copy a table with an xml type in it to a new schema in the same database I get an ora-19009.
The setup is as follows I have a schema a with table TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE where data is:
CREATE
TABLE TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE
FOLDER_ID NUMBER (10, 0) NOT NULL,
SEARCH_PROPERTIES XMLTYPE ,
CONSTRAINT TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE PK PRIMARY KEY (FOLDERID) USING INDEX
XMLTYPE COLUMN SEARCH_PROPERTIES XMLSCHEMA
"http://xxxxxxx.net/FolderProperties.xsd" element "FolderProperties"
VARRAY SEARCH_PROPERTIES."XMLDATA"."PROPERTIES"."PROPERTY" STORE AS TABLE
PROPERTY_TABLE
(PRIMARY KEY (NESTED_TABLE_ID, ARRAY_INDEX)) ORGANIZATION INDEX OVERFLOW
Both schemas have the following xml schema registered as a local xml schema
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLSCHEMA.registerSchema(
SCHEMAURL => 'http://xxxxxxx.net/FolderProperties.xsd',
SCHEMADOC =>
'<xs:schema xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xdb="http://xmlns.oracle.com/xdb"
xdb:storeVarrayAsTable="true">
<xs:element name="FolderProperties"
type="FolderPropertiesType"
xdb:defaultTable="FOLDER_SEARCH_PROPERTIES" />
<xs:complexType name="FolderPropertiesType" xdb:SQLType="FOLDERPROPERTIES_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="FolderID" type="FolderIDType" minOccurs="1" xdb:SQLName="FOLDER_ID"/>
<xs:element name="Properties" type="PropertiesType" xdb:SQLName="PROPERTIES"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PropertiesType" xdb:SQLType="PROPERTIES_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="Property" type="PropertyType" maxOccurs="unbounded"
xdb:SQLName="PROPERTY" xdb:SQLCollType="PROPERTY_V"/>
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:complexType name="PropertyType" xdb:SQLType="PROPERTY_T">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element name="DateValue" type="DateType" xdb:SQLName="DATE_VALUE"/>
<xs:element name="NumValue" type="NumType" xdb:SQLName="NUM_VALUE"/>
<xs:element name="StringValue" type="StringType" xdb:SQLName="STRING_VALUE"/>
</xs:sequence>
<xs:attribute name="Name" xdb:SQLName="NAME" xdb:SQLType="VARCHAR2">
<xs:simpleType>
<xs:restriction base="xs:string">
<xs:minLength value="1"/>
<xs:maxLength value="255"/>
</xs:restriction>
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:attribute>
</xs:complexType>
<xs:simpleType name="FolderIDType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:integer"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="DateType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:dateTime"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="NumType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:decimal"/>
</xs:simpleType>
<xs:simpleType name="StringType">
<xs:restriction base="xs:string" />
</xs:simpleType>
</xs:schema>',
LOCAL => TRUE,
GENTYPES => TRUE,
GENTABLES => FALSE);
END;
when I try to do the following insert:
insert into schemaB.TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE ( FOLDER_ID, SEARCH_PROPERTIES)
select FOLDER_ID, SEARCH_PROPERTIES from schemaB.TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE;
I’ll get an ora-19007.
Can some one point me in the right direction how to solve this error.
Thanks Roelof.

Who did you create the second table, in other words, how did you COPY the table as you said...
If you created the second table via a CTAS (create table as select) then you will have created a table that is not the same as the original one. AFAIK I have once created an enhancement request for this after discovering that JDeveloper, for example, creates a "copy" via a CTAS which creates the wrong structure. Double check via package DBMS_METADATA.
SQL> set long 1000000
SQL> select DBMS_METADATA('TABLE','TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE','SchemaA') from dual;
SQL> select DBMS_METADATA('TABLE','TABLE_WITH_XMLTYPE','SchemaB') from dual;If you have got two different tables, than Mark's solution should help.
M.
Edited by: Marco Gralike on Feb 15, 2009 11:16 AM

Issue With Sales Document Type in BW.

Dear Experts,
I am facing an Issue with Sales Document Type(Object name is 0DOC_TYPE).
when i am loading data from R/3 to BW It is converting Sales Document type as follow
Sales Document Type in R/3                         Sales Document Type in BW
OR                                                                        TA
CR                                                                        G2
DR                                                                        L2
I check with an ABAPer and he told that there is conversion exit for this Object so that's why it is converting when sending to BW. But the user wants to see in Report same as it is in R/3 like OR, CR DR ... etc.
I have done some investigation and found that the conversion exit (CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) are converting the values based in the table TAUUM
The staructure of TAUUM is
MANDT(Client) SPRAS(Language) AUART(Sales document type (not converted)   AUART_SPR(Language key for sales document type)
and values are
100 E TA OR
100 E G2 CR
etc....
The same Conversion exits(CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_INPUT and CONVERSION_EXIT_AUART_OUTPUT) and table TAUUM are available in BW as well. So i thought I can Use InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE by changing it's conversion Routine as AUART(which runs based on the above mentioned conversion exits).
but the the problem is table TAUUM(Pool Table) does't have any data in BW.
So can anyone tell me is there any option to load data into table TAUUM from R/3 or any other option to solve this issue.
Your ideas will really help's me.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

Hi Venkat,
Thanks a lot for your immediate response.
The InfoObject 0DOC_TYPE was without conversion exit by default. but when data coming from R/3 it is converting and sending to BW So that's why i am planning to use conversion exit "AUART" in the info Object.
I checked data in R/3 using RSA3 it is showing sales document type as "OR" and for the same transaction data when i checked in PSA it is showing as "TA".
Could you please let me know if there any other options.
Thanks in advance,
Dara.

Check box with Boolean data type is not behaving properly

Hi,
I create a sample application with one entity driven view object with two attributes. One is of String data type [Value will be Y/N] and another (transient) attribute with Boolean data type. I planned to bind this boolean data type attribute to UI. I overridded the view row impl class and included setting of boolean attribute inside the setter of String attribute. Also in the getter of boolean attribute, added code to check the string attribute and return true/false based on that. Everything is working fine in application module tester. But when i test the same in view controller project in a page, it is not working. Always Check box component is not checked eventhough when i explicitly check it.
[NOTE: I have given the control hint of Boolean attribute as check_box. Also i don't want selected/unselected entries in the page def file. That's why followed this approach]
Have i missed out anything? Why this behaviour.
Thanks in advance.
Raguraman

what is the value that is going in when u check it.. did u debug it.. is the viewRowimps setter and getter getting called.. and is it having the right value set and got.. and ur sure that ur using selectBooleanCheckBox..
ur binding the checkbox to the transient value right??

Sequences in Palnning with mutiple Plan types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for