Session per user = 1 is not working in database ?

Dear All,
A profile has been configured on database with parameter session_per_user=1 but it is not working on database.
user can make n number of session to database . what could be the reason profile is not working ?
Please sugeest the solution .....
Regards,
Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh.Rathod on Mar 17, 2009 3:34 AM

You have to alter resource_limit to true
Look fo rmore details in metalink note 745752.1

Similar Messages

How to realize only one identical remoteApp per session per user per computer?

If a terminalserver 2008 R1 is configured for only one session per user, everything works like it should if the user connects using the 'normal' remotedesktop session. A second connect with the same credentials kicks the first connect.
If a remoteApp is used instead of the 'normal' connect, it's possible to start multiple instances of this app within one user a least from one computer. mstsc do run multiple times and seem to link in the existent connection without kicking it. How to change
that?
Continuative:
The started RemoteApp checks the mutex of all started processes and stops herself if a process is found with the same mutex. This prevents multiple instances of this app within one user with the same sessionID. If a terminalserver is configured for only
one session per user, this RemoteApp shouldn't start multiple within one user. Using a "normal" remote desktop session the app doesn't start more than one time, I tested it. Used as RemotApp, the app starts multiple! Possibly I'm able to change this behaviour
with a code fix instead of configuring terminal services. Any tips regarding mutex and terminalservers?

Hi,
I tested the following code and it is working for me both in a RemoteApp and Full session:
Imports System.Threading
Module Main
Sub Main()
Dim createdNew As Boolean
Dim m As New Mutex(True, "TPMutex", createdNew)
If Not createdNew Then
Return
End If
Application.Run(Form1)
GC.KeepAlive(m)
End Sub
End Module
-TP

Limit the number of session per user in the Wired dot1x environment with ISE 1.2

Hello,
I need to check if there is any configuration/workaround to limit the number of sessions/access per user in the Wired dot1x configuration.
I need to check if this feature is available or not to solve the following scenario:
I have 2 SW ports configured to use dot1x authentication with ISE 1.2 server.
If user A connects to the 1st port and authenticated then he will placed on a VLAN based on the authorization profile.
The case, that I need to deny the same user to connect on a different machine with the same credentials.
The ISE itself does not have this feature currently, the only feature available is to limit the number of sessions for the guest user.
Is there any workaround on the Cisco switches to solve this? Cisco WLC has this feature and for the VPN we can limit the number of sessions also from the ASA itself.
Thanks.

limit number of session per user using wired dot1x is not available in 1.3

Clustered WL 6.1 creates 2 server sessions per user

          It appears that WL 6.1 creates 2 HTTP sessions per user for a simple JSP object.
          It shows in "ADmin Console/mydomain> DefaultWebApp> Web Applications> DefaultWebApp>
          Servlet Runtimes":
          1 /count.jsp
          1 /*.jsp
          In a non-clustered environment this does not happen.
          Is that normal?


I found the problem myself. For some reason WL did not like any special characters in the system password. I am not sure which ones are valid and which are not but I am avoiding them all right now.

No of Concurrent Sessions Per User Mismatch with profile settings

Hi
DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
OS RHES 5U2
I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER') I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
Thank you for your help
Edited by: user560883 on Jul 4, 2010 12:45 AM

user560883 wrote:
Hi
DB Version Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
OS RHES 5U2
I created a profile MYPROFILE and set the value of Concurrent Sessions (Per User) to 30. DB was bounced after creating the profile. I made this profile default for a particular user "MYUSER". I verified that by querying DBA_USERS (select profile from dba_users where username like 'MYUSER';) I checked v$session with that particular user after sometime and noticed that it was showing 34 sessions. Some ACTIVE and some INACTIVE.
My question is, if I have set the maximum limit of concurrent sessions per user to 30 in myprofile and made this the default profile for MYUSER, then how come i am still able to see more than 34 sessions of myuser regardless of the status? I am not sure if this is relevant or not but the IDLE TIME is set to 15 minutes.
Thank you for your helpDid you set the parameter resource_limit=true ? You must do it before you test sessions_per_user. You can do so like the following,
alter system set resource_limit=true;After this again try and post the feedback.
HTH
Aman....

Maximum Number of Sessions per User

I am using OAM 11.1.1.5.0 running on Solaris 10. When we change the "Maximum Number of Sessions per User" to 1 (per customer requirement), a user is restricted to having one active OAM session at a time (as expected). However, if the user does not explicitly log out (e.g. they just close their browser), they are unable to log back in to OAM until their existing OAM session times-out/expires. Given the above max sessions of 1 requirement, is it possible to config OAM to auto-kill the user's session and create a new one if they attempt to login before their initial OAM session times-out/expires? This was possible in Sun's Access Manager. Is it possible in Oracle's OAM? Thank you in advance for your reply.

Hi,
Maximum session per user 0-9 and how can configure see the below link:-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/97/76a341ac57ef0be10000000a1550b0/content.htm
Regards,
Anil

1. TACAS+ Accounting and Logged in Users report is not working on ACS 4.1(1

Hi,
I am facing problem with ACS 4.1 accounting, TACAS+ Accounting and Logged in Users report are not working, the csv file is been generated but nothing is showened in the file.
I have checked the documents related to ACS 4.1, it says that there is a bug related to command accounting âCSCsg97429 - TACACS+ Command Accounting does not work in ACS 4.1(1) Build 23â.
Tried upgrading the same with the patch applAcs-4.1.1.23.3.zip, still it is not working.
Other reports are working fine.
1. TACAS+ Accounting - not working
2. Logged in Users - not working
3. TACAS+ Administration - working
4. Passed Authentication - working
5. Failed Attempts - working
Any suggestions or any idea, please revert.
Regards
Vineet

Hi,
Thanks
Yes I have configured the command âaaa accounting exec default start-stop group tacacs+â
As I have mentioned all the other reports are working. Which user and when he has logged in and what commands he has used. Only the TACAS+ Accounting and logned user is not working.
Regards,
Vineet

GRC 10.0: Access Request Creation - LDAP user advanced search not working

Dear Experts,
We are implementing SAP GRC Access Control and we have an issue in Access Request Creation. If we put the user name in “User” field and press intro, the user details are updated, but if we want to make an "Advanced search" the user is not found and the application give us the following message: “No records found for the search criteria entered.”
Scenario 1: If we put the user name in “User” field and press intro, the user details are updated:
Scenario 2: If we want to make an "Advanced search" the user is not found and the application give us the following message: “No records found for the search criteria entered.”
We are using the Active Directory as Data Source.
Thanks and Regards.

Hi Jose,
Try maintaning the parameter 2050 as YES and check once.
Kindly, also make refer to the below list of SAP notes:
1757906 - GRC 10.0 - LDAP user search does not work in NWBC
1745370 - LDAP search in GRC does not work anonymously
1718242- UAM: User search not working in Access Request.
Regards,
Neeraj Agarwal

How do you get firefox 4 to save tabs and windows and restore them? Don't say set preferences to open them on startup or use restore previous session under history; those do not work. Or is it no longer possible to save windows and tabs?

Question
How do you get firefox 4 to save tabs and windows and restore them? Don't say set preferences to open them on startup or use restore previous session under history; those do not work. Or is it no longer possible to save windows and tabs?

'''IT'S A EASY AS IT SHOULD BE.'''
This is essentially paulbruster's answer, but I've added the steps some might assume, but which aren't so obvious to those of us who are new at this, like me.
This solution might ''appear'' to be long and complicated, but after you follow the directions once, you'll find it's quick, clean, and simple. Almost like they designed it this way.
# If you haven't already, open a bunch of tabs on a few different subjects.
# Click the List All Tabs button on the right side of the tab strip.
# Select Tab Groups.
# Create a few groups as described [http://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/what-are-tab-groups#w_how-do-i-create-a-tab-group here] , i.e. just drag them out of the main thumbnail group into the new groups they create.
# Now click on any thumbnail in any new group, but not the original big default group you may have left some tabs in.
#A regular Firefox window will open, but'' only the tabs in that group will be visible.'' You also now have the Tab Groups button in the tab strip.
# Right click on any tab, and there it is: Bookmark All Tabs. Click on it in the list of options. Or you can hit Ctrl+Shift+D instead and go straight to the dialogue box from the tab without any clicks. But don't go looking for this familiar option anywhere else, 'cause it's not there.
# Now pick an existing folder or create a new one just like you would have before and '''shlpam!''' there they are. New folders are supposed to end up in the Unsorted category all the way at the very bottom, but for some reason mine show up at the bottom of my last sorted category.
# DO NOT CLICK THE UPPER-RIGHTMOST X to close this group of tabs. This will close ALL of your tabs in all groups, currently visible or not. At least it asks if you're sure first. Instead, click your new Tab Groups button to return to the Boxes 'O Thumbnails window, and click the X in the group box you just bookmarked.
# Click on another thumbnail to repeat the process with another group, or click on a thumbnail in the big default box to return to the original FF window. You can also click the Tab Groups button at the upper right, or Ctrl+Shift+E, which will also get you ''into'' the Boxes 'O Nails window ''from'' FF.
# So now when you reopen FF after shutdown, simply select your folder from your Bookmarks and Open All in Tabs. '''Just like paulbruster said. '''

Single Database Session Per User in ADF/BC Application

Hi, I am using ADF with BC (JDeveloper 11.1.1.1). My application contains multiple application modules, each connected to the same JDBC data source. On the app server, I have configured the data source to use Identity Based Connection Pooling.
My current configuration is resulting in numerous database sessions for each user. I have a requirement to use only a single database session per user HTTP session. Is there any way to configure the application modules to achieve this?
Thanks,
Brad

Hi,
use a single root Am module and make sure the others are used as nested modules. This will create a single connection
Frank

Sp_who2 -need only active sessions from users which are not the background sessions

Hello,
sp_who2 -need only active sessions from users which are not the background sessions
Please assist.
Best regards,
Vishal

Its better to use DMV's to view only active sessions from users (spid>50) as mentioned by Shanky.
You can do that using sp_who2 but it requires a bit of programming to list only user sessions.
SELECT
S.SESSION_ID,
S.STATUS,
S.HOST_NAME,
C.CLIENT_NET_ADDRESS,
CASE WHEN S.LOGIN_NAME = S.ORIGINAL_LOGIN_NAME THEN S.LOGIN_NAME ELSE S.LOGIN_NAME END LOGIN_NAME,
S.PROGRAM_NAME,
C.CONNECT_TIME,
S.LOGIN_TIME,
CASE S.TRANSACTION_ISOLATION_LEVEL
WHEN 0 THEN 'UNSPECIFIED'
WHEN 1 THEN 'READUNCOMITTED'
WHEN 2 THEN 'READCOMMITTED'
WHEN 3 THEN 'REPEATABLE'
WHEN 4 THEN 'SERIALIZABLE'
WHEN 5 THEN 'SNAPSHOT'
ELSE CAST(S.TRANSACTION_ISOLATION_LEVEL AS VARCHAR(32))
END AS TRANSACTION_ISOLATION_LEVEL_NAME,
S.LAST_SUCCESSFUL_LOGON,
S.LAST_UNSUCCESSFUL_LOGON,
S.UNSUCCESSFUL_LOGONS,
S.CPU_TIME AS CPU_TIME_MS,
S.MEMORY_USAGE AS MEMORY_USAGE_PAGES,
S.ROW_COUNT,
S.PREV_ERROR,
S.LAST_REQUEST_START_TIME,
S.LAST_REQUEST_END_TIME,
C.NET_TRANSPORT,
C.PROTOCOL_TYPE,
S.LANGUAGE,
S.DATE_FORMAT,
ST.TEXT AS QUERY_TEXT
FROM
SYS.DM_EXEC_SESSIONS S
FULL OUTER JOIN SYS.DM_EXEC_CONNECTIONS C ON C.SESSION_ID = S.SESSION_ID
CROSS APPLY SYS.DM_EXEC_SQL_TEXT(C.MOST_RECENT_SQL_HANDLE) ST
WHERE
S.SESSION_ID IS NULL
OR S.SESSION_ID > 50
ORDER BY
S.SESSION_ID
-Prashanth

Per window private browsing not working, still sharing cookies

Firefox 21, per window private browsing not working. The cookies are still shared among private browsing windows and tabs. Even with private tab addon, still not working.
If I log into google in one tab, I am still logged in with that account in new private tabs and private windows.

One more question about cookies in private browsing mode.
I don't like browse a web using usual mode 'cause I don't like tonns of sites in a history. But when I start with private mode every time I get empty set of cookies and this was not quite good for me 'cause some sites store its options needed for me. In a prev. versions of FF I solved this issue in such a way: I stored some cookies in a file and every time I started private browsing I loaded them from file. But now this method gives nothing: in cookies manager all set of "non private" cookies is shown both before importing and after importing them from a file and I need to reconfigure my sites every time I start private browsing.
I'm sorry for my English.

Application user USERNAME is not authorized this database.

I am trying to login to R12 through "http://<server_name:port>/forms/frmservlet" ,at the login screen while entering username & password , I'm getting
Application user <USERNAME> is not authorized this database.
Note : This is first time I am trying to login after R12 upgrade.

Error log
[Mon Mar 28 02:49:09 2011] [notice] Oracle-Application-Server-10g/10.1.3.4.0 Oracle-HTTP-Server configured -- resuming normal operations
[Mon Mar 28 02:49:09 2011] [notice] Accept mutex: fcntl (Default: fcntl)
[Mon Mar 28 02:51:01 2011] [error] [client 172.20.81.35] [ecid: 1301295061:151.110.228.14:31256:0:1,0] File does not exist: /opt/egapc2d/inst/apps/EGEBC2D_etad546/portal/favicon.icoApplication log :
11/03/28 02:44:53.602 html: Servlet error
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: Could not initialize class oracle.apps.fnd.sso.Utils
at oracle.apps.fnd.sso.AppsLoginRedirect.AppsSetting(AppsLoginRedirect.java:116)
at oracle.apps.fnd.sso.AppsLoginRedirect.init(AppsLoginRedirect.java:170)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpApplication.loadServlet(HttpApplication.java:2379)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpApplication.findServlet(HttpApplication.java:4830)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpApplication.findServlet(HttpApplication.java:4754)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpApplication.getRequestDispatcher(HttpApplication.java:2978)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:738)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:453)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:313)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) ].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:199)
at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
at com.evermind[Oracle Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.3.4.0) >].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
Caused by: oracle.apps.fnd.common.AppsException: oracle.apps.fnd.common.PoolException: Not able to create new database connection: FND^@SECURITY_APPL_USER_NOTAUTH^@N^@USER^@GUEST^@
Caused by: oracle.apps.fnd.common.PoolException: Not able to create new database connection: FND^@SECURITY_APPL_USER_NOTAUTH^@N^@USER^@GUEST^@

Perl command not working throgh database.

Hello,
I am using perl command to convert unix format to dos format.
I have written perl command in shell script and call shell script though database.
Suddenly perl command is not working though database call.
I can convert file using perl command through command promt.
What could be the issue?

user10540254 wrote:
What could be the issue?Environment. When making that o/s call to run the perl script from inside Oracle, an external o/s process is created. This process executes the perl script. This process needs a valid environment (e.g PATH variable and others) in order to find the Perl run-time system, the required commands and libraries and so on.
If the process does not have a valid environment, it will fail. You can test that manually by logging on to the server, and running the command unset PATH before executing the Perl script.
One approach to this, is not to call something like the perl script directly. Instead create a shell wrapper script. In this script set a valid environment and then have it execute the perl script with the required command line parameters. Typically a shell script can always be executed (despite minimal environment settings), as long as you fully qualify the location (path) of the script.

Per Session / per User shaping and queuing not working on 7206/7204 on 15.2

Hello,
we are running the following scenario - to provide QoS (shaping/queueing) for our broadband (pppoe) users, we have configured several service-policies on our 7206/7204 BRAS-Routers. The service-policies are applied with RADIUS-Attributes when the pppoe-users dials in. The service-policies look like this
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Parent Policy 4 mbps >>
class class-default
shape average 3900000
bandwidth 3900
   service-policy POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
policy-map POL-BM-DEF-C_4m-DSCP-OUT
description << Child Policy 4 mbps >>
class CM-VO-DEF-DSCP
priority 900
police cir 900000
   conform-action transmit
   exceed-action drop
class CM-VS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 100
class CM-ID-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 900
class CM-MS-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 600
class CM-MC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 300
class CM-NC-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class CM-NM-DEF-DSCP
bandwidth 150
class class-default
bandwidth 800
We are applying the policies with the following Cisco-AV-Pair attribute
lcp:interface-config=service-policy output POL-BM-DEF-P_4m-DSCP-OUT
Until recently that did work pretty good when using software 12.2(33)SRC3. But it turned out that there is a bug in this software that causes that the policy is applied but not working correct sometimes. See bug CSCsv27825. Although that bug does not match the software we are using, the symptoms do. Basically the parent shaper is not working, so there is no backpressure, no need for qos to kick in ;-)
The recommendation was to upgrade to Version 15.2(4)M5. When downloading the image there was a recommendation on the website to use Version 15.2(4)M6 instead, because of some important bugfixes. So we installed that, system cmes back online, everything works - except the service-policies. they are not applied at all any more.
After doing some tests it turns out that
- Policies that shape are not applied. It does not matter if using the ip:sub-qos-policy-out=xxx or lcp:interface-config=service-policy output xxx attribute.
- Policies that police like the one here are applied
policy-map POL-POLICE-DEF-P_1M-DSCP-OUT
class class-default
police 1000000
We prefer the shaping way, because of the smoother handling of bursty traffic.
Any ideas/recommendations ? I've tbeen readign a litte bit on the internet - that problem is not new, but unfortunately no one has a solution :-(
Best regards
Carsten
Short update: as soon as some queuing configuration is present in the policy (parent and/or child) it is not applied. i tried to be extra clever and combine the "policer" parent policy with our child-policy which does priority queuing - not applied. Even the parent-policy alone with no child policy (just the shaper) is not gettign applied.
Any ideas what to debug to get a reason why it is not working ?

Please Ignore Spelling errors. "I asked" replaced "It asked".
Please Reply as soon as Possible !

Session per user = 1 is not working in database ?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for