SETTING UP APPROVAL LIMITS IN AR IN VISION OPERATIONS

Whilst in the AR Corporate Super User responsibility in Vision Operations, I defined approval limits for a an application user with a currency of GBP and an amount ranging from £5000 to£6000 and then saved it. Later, I then decided that I wanted to change the amounts from lets say £10,000 to £20,000. Whwn I call up the user in the Approval limits window in AR and I try to click in the currency filed I get the following message:
APPS_AR_11290 The approval limit for the user (eg Fred)for the currency GBP already exists. How do I change the amounts
and what reports can I run to see the various users and their approval limits? please advise me

you need to use AR approval limits form for the apropriate organization.
merci,
iguru

Similar Messages

Credit memo (CM) Approval limits set are not being checked in CM creation

Hi,
Customer: ARROW ELECTRONICS INC
SR: 6502816.993
Customer has set the approval limits for credit memo in Receivables
He has set the approval limit as -500 to 0 for a user X.
Created an invoice for 550 $
Gone to Ireceivables and created a dispute for the complete amount (-550$) of the invoice.
Find that the notification is going to the user X even when the amount is not within the approval limits set.
He is able to approve the notification and it is going to the next level approval.
Once that is done the credit memo is getting created.
Checked the packages involved in this.
ARWCMWFB.pls
Find that there is no checking of the approval limits in the package.
Please help me in knowing on whether this is an intended functionality.
Thanks and regards,
Hareesh

Hareesh
Using HR Hierarchy
1. Define three approvers A, B, C for the same reason code and with different approval limits (as this is credit memo the guy with highest negative amount has is the final approver).
2. A reports to B and B reports to C
3. A is approval limit is from -100 to -500, B can approve from -500 to -1000 and C can approve from -1000 to -1500 (all of them have same reason code and currency code).
4. Make sure all of them are employees.
5. Make sure you **DO NOT** check the flag Primary Approver for any of these approval limits in the approval limits screen.
6. In the employees -- Assignments For A, enter supervisor as B, and For B enter Supervisor as C.
7.No enter an invoice for 1200 and complete it.
8. Request for credit from iReceivables for the same invoice for -1200.
9. Now you can see that the notification will go to B and C for approval.
Using Approval Limits hierarchy:
If you do not want to use the employee setup, they can always, use the primary check box. With the same example as above, check the primary check box for A, B and C.
When you request for credit, first A gets, next B gets it and then C gets it.
If you check for only C which is the final approver, workflow will send only one notification and once C approves it will forward.
Ofcourse, before any of these guys are approving, collector assigned to the customer has to approve.
And after all these approvals one more Role (called Receivable Role which can be anybody according to the WF definition) has to approve before the credit is generated).
Now, I am not sure what the customer wants. Do they want multiple approvals or single approval? If they want multiple they have to use the first approach. If not they can use the second approach.
I did a test case again and these comments are the results of the test. I did this on 11.5.9.
Let me know if you have any questions. Also please refer to the metalink note 284804.1How Does Credit Memo Workflow Notify Multiple Approvers?.
Thanks
Nagamohan

Approval Limits Report

Hi,
I am trying to create a report for giving the approval limits based on the organisation that employees work for however have hit a problem I think possibly with the way the data is set up in our organization but I can't seem to find a way around it. The report needs to display the employee (from per_all_people_f), their job (from per_jobs), their approval limit (from po_control_rules) and the name of the control group (from po_control_groups_all). You need to go through the table 'po_position_controls_all' in order to link per_jobs to po_control_rules and its this table I think which is causing the issue because of a one-many relationship between jobs and control groups.
The below SQL:
select PJ.JOB_ID, PJ.name, PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID, PPCA.ORG_ID, PCR.AMOUNT_LIMIT, PCGA.CONTROL_GROUP_NAME, PCGA.ORG_ID
from APPS.PER_JOBS PJ
inner join APPS.PO_POSITION_CONTROLS_ALL PPCA on PPCA.JOB_ID = PJ.JOB_ID
inner join APPS.PO_CONTROL_RULES PCR on PCR.CONTROL_GROUP_ID = PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID
inner join APPS.PO_CONTROL_GROUPS_ALL PCGA on PCGA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID = PPCA.CONTROL_GROUP_ID
where 1=1
and PJ.name = 'Job A'
and PPCA.CONTROL_FUNCTION_ID = 1
and PCR.OBJECT_CODE = 'DOCUMENT_TOTAL'
and PCGA.ENABLED_FLAG = 'Y'
Gives a result like this: (I have simplified the data and note that there are many jobs and UP TO 3 approval groups per job (as we have 3 organisations but there may be one or 2))
JOB_ID | NAME | CONTROL_GROUP_ID | ORG_ID | AMOUNT_LIMIT | CONTROL_GROUP_NAME | ORG_ID_1
1 | Job A | 11 | 1 | 100 | Approval Level 100 | 1
1 | Job A | 12 | 2 | 200 | Approval Level 200 | 2
1 | Job A | 13 | 3 | 300 | Approval Level 300 | 3
Now I am guessing although haven't looked in to it yet that the way it works in the application when approving a PO it will see which org the PO is for (a column in the PO tables) so cross referencing that with the job id of the approver it will be able to get a single "amount limit" they can approve up to however in the report I don't have this context so if I have some employee data like this:
Employee Name | JOB_ID | Who they approve PO's for (org)
Bob | 1 | 1,2
Paul | 1 | 1
Harry | 1 | 3
Terry | 1 | 2
If i write a query for my report no matter what "org_id" I supply it (for PPCA or PCGA) it will always return all 4 employees, however I want to be able to get back that for org 1 Bob and Paul approve them (with a limit of 100) and for org 2 Bob and Terry approve (with a limit of 200) and for org 3 Harry approves (with a limit of 300)
Edited by: pnj on 15-Nov-2012 07:17

Hi pskumar, thanks for your reply. Unfortunately the orgnaization_id in per_all_assignments_f is populated by the business unit which the 3 different organisations are under. Basically (other than looking at a person's responsbilities which doesnt have an organization_id on either) there doesn't seem to be way of establishing who works for each organization. I've seen some trends, like their address, or their cost centre but it isn't accurate enough.
Thanks

Approval Limits Count Query

We have job titles, and job titles have approval limit attached to them.
Approval limits work against document types - so that for example, job title 'Extended Services Strategy Manager::CA:CB:46' might be able to approve:
1. Standard Purchase Orders
2. Purchase Requisitions
3. Internal Requisitions
This is a sample SQL to show how tables are joined:
The following SQL details how the tables are joined
SELECT   pj.NAME
2         , pcf.control_function_name
3         , pcga.control_group_name control_group
4         , pcr.amount_limit
5      FROM po.po_position_controls_all ppca
6         , po.po_control_groups_all pcga
7         , po.po_control_functions pcf
8         , po.po_control_rules pcr
9         , hr.per_jobs pj
10     WHERE ppca.job_id = pj.job_id
11       AND pcga.control_group_id = ppca.control_group_id
12       AND pcf.control_function_id = ppca.control_function_id
13       AND pcr.control_group_id = ppca.control_group_id
14       AND pcr.object_code = 'DOCUMENT_TOTAL'
15       AND pj.NAME IN
16              ('6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031'
17             , 'Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::')
18 ORDER BY pj.NAME;
NAME                                                               CONTROL_FUNCTION_NAME             CONTROL_GROUP   AMOUNT_LIMIT
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Purchase Requisitions     GG £5000                5000
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Standard Purchase Orders GG £5000                5000
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Purchase Requisitions     GH £5000                5000
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Standard Purchase Orders GH £5000                5000
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Purchase Requisitions     GJ £5000                5000
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                       Approve Standard Purchase Orders GJ £5000                5000
Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::                                            Approve Purchase Requisitions     AC £10000              10000
Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::                                            Approve Standard Purchase Orders AC £10000              10000
Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::                                            Approve Internal Requisitions     AC £10000              10000
9 rows selected.
SQL>Each of the 'CONTROL_GROUPS', stored in the po.po_control_groups_all table hold the name of a Control Group - e.g. GG £5000.
Each CONTROL_GROUP has a rule attached to it (stored in the po.po_control_rules table).
The rule has an approval value attached to it (abount_limit).
The 'CONTROL_GROUP' is also attached to a control_function_name, which is just a document type. So we can say, for example, that against a job title, a user can approve Standard Purchase Orders, and Purchase Requisitions, for the GG Service Segment, for a value of £5000.
Our policy states that the abount_limit against a job title should always be the same. As you can see above - the amount_limit for the 6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031 is only ever set to £5000.
However, there are job titles where the amount_limit value contains 2 or more different values against a job title.
I need a way to identify these job titles, but I cannot work out how to do it.
I could do a count of CONTROL_GROUPS against a job title, but that doesn't help a lot:
SELECT   pj.NAME
2         , COUNT(*) ct
3      FROM po.po_position_controls_all ppca
4         , po.po_control_rules pcr
5         , hr.per_jobs pj
6     WHERE ppca.job_id = pj.job_id
7       AND pcr.control_group_id = ppca.control_group_id
8       AND SYSDATE BETWEEN ppca.start_date AND NVL(ppca.end_date, SYSDATE + 1)
9       AND pcr.object_code = 'DOCUMENT_TOTAL'
10       AND pj.NAME IN
11              ('6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031'
12             , 'Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::')
13 GROUP BY pj.NAME
14 ORDER BY 2 DESC;
NAME
6th Form Admin and Cover Officer::AA:AE:5031                                              6
Acc Asst/Auditor:G:KB::                                                                   3
SQL>Because I can see now that there are 6 rules attached to the first job title. Ideally, what would be great would be to find a way to modify the Counbt SQL statement above, to include a 3rd column which did a distinct count of how many different 'amount_limits' were also attached to the job title.
That is where I am very stuck.
Any help much appreciated.
Sorry for writing so much. Seems easier to write too much, than not enough. I can provide desc outputs for the tables as well, but haven't done right away, because it'd make this post even longer...

Hi Colin,
thanks for your reply.
Sorry for asking a silly question - I'm not familiar with what DDL and DML are - would that be the same as me doing something like:
desc table_name;
And supplying the table structures of the tables in question?
Just checked on Google, and found:
http://www.orafaq.com/faq/what_are_the_difference_between_ddl_dml_and_dcl_commands
But I'm still not too sure what you would like me to supply...
Sorry.

APPROVAL LIMITS IN ORACLE RECEIVABLES

Whilst in the AR Corporate Super User responsibility in Vision Operations, I defined approval limits for a an application user with a currency of GBP and an amount ranging from £5000 to£6000 and then saved it. Later, I then decided that I wanted to change the amounts from lets say £10,000 to £20,000. Whwn I call up the user in the Approval limits window in AR and I try to click in the currency filed I get the following message:
APPS_AR_11290 The approval limit for the user (eg Fred)for the currency GBP already exists. How do I change the amounts
and what reports can I run to see the various users and their approval limits? please advise me

Hi,
For your current requirement please follow the below procedure.
1. Disable the Automatic Transaction Numbering In the Transaction Window.
Navigation: Receivables Manager --> Setup --> Transactions --> Sources.
In the transactions sources window Disable the Automatic Transaction Numbering.
Now we are able to create the transactions with alphabetical numbering.
Regards.
Raju.

Approval limits

Dear all
I neeed to set approval limits for concerened employees and set hierarchies for purchase requistions and Purchase orders in oracle purchasing. how can it be done. Kindly update
Regards
Arifuddin

Hi Colin,
thanks for your reply.
Sorry for asking a silly question - I'm not familiar with what DDL and DML are - would that be the same as me doing something like:
desc table_name;
And supplying the table structures of the tables in question?
Just checked on Google, and found:
http://www.orafaq.com/faq/what_are_the_difference_between_ddl_dml_and_dcl_commands
But I'm still not too sure what you would like me to supply...
Sorry.

Define Credit Memo Approval Limits for Approvers in receivables

Hi is there any way we can setup approval of credit memos in receivables to go directly to the persons manager who is inputting the memo ?
much like a requisition does when its sent for approval?
ie it just keeps going up the hierarchy until it finds some one who can approve?

Refer to Re: Credit memo (CM) Approval limits set are not being checked in CM creation
Thanks
Nagamohan

How Much To Set Up A Company, How Much To Set Up A Limited Company

Market specialists stated, find enormous opportunities associated with Fb shoulds 't be impaired go after pluralism, should certainly still concentrate on key enterprise in order to Yahoo release potent concern.
Despite the fact that about Fb Boss How Much To Set Up A Limited Company Level ??? Level Zuckerberg hochfrequenztechnik zack () feasible actions in the future got various suggestions, most of this marketplace colleagues consider, zack sulzberger must not without research going after diverse.
Researching the market company Forrester specialists augean Lewis (Augie Lewis), "said Fb should stay away from as the level is big and it has a tremendous income hazards. However in numerous career fields offers put in greatly seems really interesting, yet Fb should still concentrate on the within personal talk about, cultural along with marketing and sales communications facets of the particular key worth.Inch
Advertising accounts explained Wednesday about Fb, Goldman sachs purchase $450 trillion, values with regard to $50 thousand. Russian federation purchase firm DST more people $50 trillion purchase.
Gabriel advisory class professional Serta otzi (Serta, explained Fb Olds) really worth is booming, "if about Fb values associated with precise, meaning the really worth over the particular topline from the Forty instances, in the present atmosphere, this particular rate is actually high".
Researching the market company Enderle Team specialists shedd towel, nordex sahbaz associated with ullage Enderle) explained, zack sulzberger should certainly properly help save an excellent a part of brand new elevate resources, while he has to utilize the resources concern Yahoo.
Fb along with Yahoo between your significantly ferocious levels of competition, both the firms will be the innovator with their individual places, more vital is actually, these people wish to turn into cultural Net discipline business. Yahoo offers allegedly are generally establishing their unique websites.
Nordex the, "said the brand new must use any Fb boosting resources concern Yahoo. Boost existing property income-producing potential, reduce Yahoo within cultural Net discipline in order to make money, help the services associated with sticky needs to be sensible purchase method.
Upon Wednesday, an investigation claims Fb achievement via Goldman sachs along with Russian federation purchase firm DST funding $500m, used by more enlargement. The other day, Groupon on the investments along with change fee (Securities and exchange commission) filings propose, offers received Five thousand us dollars purchase, doing the brand new spherical Ten thousand funding 50 percent.
Renaissance are generally second in command along with Initial public offering specialists Bard Wednesday meeting with regard to, "said Fb is the alluring placement, people are prepared to that anytime in order to chuck income.Inch Your professional included, the latest funding will not likely alter the Initial public offering prepare. Fb The corporation promises to personal the Initial public offering deceptive along with leader indicate -- zack sulzberger these days short-term first showed within about lately detailed declines.
Pertaining to Bard claims, "we trust the conclusion associated with This year May well Fb software sent in Initial public offering, so that the organization will likely be placed in earlier Next year.Inch He or she is supposed to Groupon could have much the same detailed schedule. Accounts state Groupon offers declined research huge Yahoo Sixty thousand takeover bet.
Pertaining to Groupon Bard claims Fb is extremely involved just with in which you firm, far wall from the social media website includes enterprise LinkedIn, cultural online game builders Facebook and internet based paid dating sites eHarmony and so forth, people to the telltale internet sites really curious. Pertaining to Bard claims, The year of 2010 the particular Initial public offering industry functionality demonstrated that people purchase increasing requirement for these types of high-speed growth firm excited.
Given that absolutely no detailed, the organization don't need to encounter via investors associated with force. To maintain fast development, the particular Fb is constantly on the try out brand new career fields, for example brand new Advert formatting. Even so, there are other plus much more people with the extra industry SharesPost and so forth SecondMarket and buying Fb as well as other individual gives within the firm.
Throughout SharesPost, customers about Fb newest bet offers arrived at $40 for each talk about in order to $50. The other day, options explained the us investments along with change fee initiated a policy of looking into Fb and so forth gives from the firm within the extra industry financial transaction. In case Fb investor over 400 folks, Securities and exchange commission may require firm general public monetary info.
Fb along with How Much To Set Up A Company Groupon this kind of firm can draw in plenty of individual money to stop Initial public offering. In a nutshell, The year of 2010 wind flow forged assist firm within the Initial public offering industry functionality improved upon. Your dow jones Smith VentureSource Wednesday explained very last Forty six leveraging the particular forged from the firm offers funding assist $3.Four thousand, Last year simply 7 upwards industry funding Nine.Walk thousand us dollars.

Myrphy's computer-law §1: Never change a running Windows
The time between installation and update after three years is a too long period. Drivers and tools had changed extensive.
In the case like this very often it will be the best way to leave the drivers and tools untouched until a new installation of the computer.
Otherwise sometimes the software prerequisits may have been changed that additional packets need to be installed (f.ex. Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5). It is also recommended, to remove the old driver/software before installing the update. Very often it might help to read the installation instructions on the download pages concerning "Update install".
My home-forum: http://www.thinkpad-forum.de
Wiki: Deutsches ThinkPad-Wiki English ThinkWiki
My ThinkPad-Collection

How do to set up time limits on a guest network

I have a new generation Airport Time Capsule and I have set up a Guest Network for my kids but I would like to set up time limits on the Guest Network also, is there a way to do it?

It is not possible to set up specific time limits for the Guest Network as a whole, but it is possible to set up individual time limits for each device that will be connecting to the Guest Network.....and, also the main network for that matter.
If you can provide us with some more specifics on what you are trying to accomplish, how many devices will be involved, etc.......that will help us craft our answer to provide accurate information.
Meanwhile, if you want to take a look at the general settings in Timed Access....
Open Macintosh HD > Applications > Utilities > AirPort Utility
Click on the Time Capsule icon, then click Edit
Click the Network tab at the top of the screen
Enter a check mark in the box next to Enable Timed Access
Click on the Timed Access button
Click Cancel to avoid making any changes to your current setup

Workflow Error Message: System Account - The Workflow could not set Content Approval Status

This is the first time I try an approval workflow. I am using a template in MS Word and assigned an approval workflow to it. The approval workflow is only going to one person in this case.
When I start the work flow the following 3 error messages show up:
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The Workflow could not set Content Approval Status. Enable content moderation for this list and run the workflow again.
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The e-mail message cannot be sent. Make sure the e-mail has a valid recipient.
Workflow Error Message: System Account - The e-mail message cannot be sent. Make sure the outgoing e-mail settings for the server are configured correctly.
Thank you for your kind guidance.

Hi,
For the first error: Did you set Content Approval in the workflow? If so, see if you have it in the versioning settings of the list settings.
For the second error: double check your recipient is set up as being valid. Did you type in the email address or is it referring to a people picker field? also, make sure that in the workflow for the email that you actually populated it in the
To: field.
for the third error: I suspect that either your farm is not configured for email. Or, this error is a knock on from the second error. If you get the second error rectified it may clear this error. If not then double check the email settings
for your farm.
Johnathan Lightfoot

SP2010 Designer workflow "Set Content Approval Status" does not work

Hello
I'm having a problem with a workflow for one of my clients.It is a SharePoint 2010 environment and I can only use SharePoint 2010 designer (no visual studio).
We have an approval workflow in place, which works great. After the document approval workflow has does its thing, a new workflow can be launged by specific users (they have writing rights and can approve content). The workflow is used to set the release
date of the document. This can only be determined after content approval.
However, when the release date is set, the document approval status is changed to concept. This is of course to be expected, as we changed to document metadata. That is why I wanted to add the action "Set content approval" to this workflow. I cannot
seem to get this action to work. Right now the workflow does the following:
check out the document (check out is obligatory in our library)
set the release date field to the released date parameter (defined when starting the workflow)
check in the document
set content approval to approved.
The release date gets set to the parameter value, but the document is not checked in and the content approval status is not set. SharePoint produces the following error message (translated from Dutch): "An error occured. Cannot edit the item, possibly
because one or more columns require another type of content. Unknown error."
Guided by other posts online I gathered that this might be because the actions checkin and set content approval occur to close together. I tried letting the workflow pause for the duration of 1 minute after checking in, but this pauses the workflow indefinitely.
I then tried 5 minutes (as this is the time standard set by SP2010 designer) but this also resulted in indefinite pausing.
Posts online lead me to believe that I'm not the only suffering from this problem, but as of yet, I haven't been able to find a solution that works for me. Hopefully someone can help me.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that the "Set Content Approval Status" didn’t work in SharePoint 2010 Designer workflow.
I try to reproduce the issue and the result is the same as yours.
If I only check out and check in the item, the workflow works well.
However, once I set Content Approval Status after checking in the item, the workflow get error.
As a workaround, I recommend to use two workflow to achieve what you want.
First, create the first workflow, and allow the workflow to be manually started.
Then, create the second workflow, and
start the workflow automatically when an item is changed.
When you start the first workflow, the document will be set value of the release date. And then the second workflow will be started automatically to set the content approval status.
Thank you for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Set up Tolerance Limits with Date and quantity for GR

Hi Experts,
We would like to set the GR Tolerance Limits with Date and qty.
how to set the Tolerance Limits for Date and quantity..??
if we created PO 100qty and date 01-05-009.
if we receive the goods on 20-04-2009 and 50qty...
For GR .. Migo should be give error message..
where can i set this Tolerance Limit Configuration.... can u please explin me..
Thanks in Advance,
Anthyodaya .

hi,
You can do one thing...
Activate the SLED check...
BY this when the date goes earlier or late from the expected date, then system show you the messages like:
1. Earliest delivery date is DD.MM.YY..
2. Expected delivery date was DD.MM.YY...
In std sap system, the second message is already error message...so when get late delivery then it'll not be possible to maintain the GR...
For the qty varinace, activate the quantity variance either via over/under delievery tolerances..or
Via SPRO settings...
SPRO >> MM >> LIV >> Invoice block >> check for qty tolerances and make the settings as per your requirement...
Regards
Priyanka.P

Buyer Approval Limits - r12

Hello
This is on r12.1.3
I have a requirement where, I need to generate listing / report that meet following criteria.
1. Employees who are buyers
2. Buyers with their approval limits
3. Buyers/Employees and their reporting manager
4. Buyers/Employees and their job title.
We do not use RBAC.
Please advise if there is such report or query handy to deliver above output.
Thanks,
Darsh

Hi Darsh,
You may check out the following documents from Metallink:
How To Query Approval Group and Approval Assignment Details For iProcurement And Purchasing Users (Doc ID 382899.1)
How To Query Approval Group and Approval Assignment Details For iProcurement And Purchasing Users (Doc ID 382899.1)
James

PPOMA Approval Limits - Report

Hi All,
Is it possible to report out on approval limits that are assigned to positions within PPOMA
Thanks
Neil

Did you find the answer? because I have the same doubt.
Thanks a lot and best regards, sapera

IExpense Approval limits

Hi ,
We are implementing iExpense for our client which has an employee count of 2300 and they don't have a proper approval limits with appropriate signing limits defined so can any one post me some leading practice implemented by clients which would be feasible by an organization which has an employee count of 2300.

One workaround is to enable AME for iexpenses and then write your custom rule in AME to simply look at the PO approval groups.
Look at
http://apps2fusion.com/at/49-cp/289-iexpense-implementation-steps
The other approach is to write custom code for inserting records into ap_web_signing_limits. I don't think there is an api for this.
Also you have to keep it in sync with the po approval data. It will not be easy because you have to update ap_web_signing_limits every time approval groups are modified, approval assignments are modified, employee positions are changed, employees are end-dated etc.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

SETTING UP APPROVAL LIMITS IN AR IN VISION OPERATIONS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for