Setting up Premiere Pro 2.0, Need an expert!

Hello, Guys
I need an expert to help out on this one,
I'm tired of setting up Premiere Pro every time I upgade, I always have to re-install
Plug-ins and other goodies like Premiere Pro 2.0 that offers DVD Templates now.
is there a way to install all these goodies and Plug-ins like in a second Hard Drive and somehow
link Premiere Pro to work from that location versas on C:\ Drive?
also
I'd like to keep at least two versions of Premiere so these two version will see the same
second Drive for Plug-ins and goodies!
I also like to do the samething for After Effects!
Can someone answer this question jus make sure how would work.
Thanks
Freddy

Thanks Harm!
but?
Windows 7 supports Premiere Pro 2.0?
I don't want to change other version of Premiere Pro, it took me long time to get a Premiere Pro
get it to work just right and now I have it.
it looks so good running like no other version of Premiere Pro before that I won't upgrade unless
I have to.
Do you have Premiere Pro running under Windows 7?
Thanks
Freddy

Similar Messages

Setting up Premiere Pro CS6 on Windows Server

I would like to know what the best way is to set up Premiere Pro CS6 on a Windows 2008 R2 server. My boss would like to set up a way for anyone to use the single license from any computer without hitting any lag. We tried doing it through a virtual machine on the server and installing Premiere Pro on the virtual machine, but we were getting lag on Audio. The video was playing alright, but the audio would take some time. Same problem when we tried to use remote desktop from a Windows 7 64 bit system to log into the virtual machine on the server. Any ideas on how we can set up the environment, reduce lag, and allow any one person to log into the system (in other words single person using the software at any time) and use the software from any computer on the network without installing extra software?

Not going to work... for a network, you need Adobe Anywhere
Any Premiere doesn't work properly, if at all, over a network
-see messages #1 and #3 in http://forums.adobe.com/thread/771151
-you MUST give all users administrator accounts to use Premiere
-and especially Encore dual layer http://forums.adobe.com/thread/969395
-#5 Server 2008 is UNsupported http://forums.adobe.com/thread/851602
-a work around, of sorts http://forums.adobe.com/thread/957523
-and not on a "domain" http://forums.adobe.com/thread/858977
-http://helpx.adobe.com/premiere-pro/kb/networks-removable-media-dva.html
A solution for networks
Adobe Anywhere http://www.adobe.com/products/adobeanywhere.html

Random Premiere Pro CC crashes ***Need help***

Hiya, this is my first time posting here so excuse my scruffy postings.
I am having some serious problems with my PP:CC and I can not find anything anywhere or anyone who has been struggling with the same crashes as myself.
What seems to happen to me is at random intervals my Premiere Pro says "Premire Pro Creative Cloud Has stopped working..." blah blah and then either closes off itself or I have to close it off, with no way for me to save my work. It gives me no crash report either and no trace to follow up as to why it crashes. These crashes can happen within 10 seconds of me opening the program and then I can edit for hours seeing nothing. It also happens when I do anything, there is not 1 specific task / operation I make for it to crash although commonly today it has crashed once I drag the timeline bar left a minute or two, or importing new video clips, adding transitions, basically anything and I don't know what's wrong!
I first got these errors when I used Premiere Pro CS5.5 and they were beoming more and more common so I decided to upgrade to CC, that didn't help my case. A friend told me to re-install QuickTime which for about a week I didn't get any crashes and managed to get a lot of work done, but now the crashes are back!
Thanks for reading and if you know anything, then please help!
PS: I am using Windows 7 and here are my specs:
Intel i7-4770K @3.50Ghz 64-bit
32 DDR3 1600mhz memory
EVGA GTX Titan

>EVGA GTX Titan
What is your exact graphics adapter driver version?
Have you gone to the vendor web site to check for a newer driver?
For Windows, do NOT rely on Windows Update to have current driver information
-you need to go direct to the vendor web site and check updates for yourself
nVidia Driver Downloads http://www.nvidia.com/Download/index.aspx?lang=en-us
How to determine your nVidia driver version
Right click in any open area of the Windows desktop
Select NVIDIA Control Panel from the popup window
Select SYSTEM INFORMATION at the lower left corner
Driver version should be the 1st line in Details
I have a GTX285 using driver 296.10 and Win7

Premiere Pro CS6 saying need 3rd party components when opening CS5.5 project

I am trying to open my current Premiere Pro CS 5.5 project within Premiere Pro CS6, but am getting the following error message:
The preset used by one or more sequences requires third party components that could not be located.
This was a project that was imported from Final Cut Pro 7 originally, but the only 3rd party stuff used in it are Magic Bullet Suite plug ins and I have already installed them all.
I can't even see if this project has CUDA acceleration anymore, as it is set to Custom Sequence and greyed out.
Any ideas what I can do?

Let it create the custom sequence and see how things are. This might not be a problem.

Err A12E5 when trying to download Premiere Pro - really just need Media Encoder

I've tried different methods of downloading AME, both as a stand-alone and as part of Premiere Pro (which I don't need.) I get the error A12E5. Please advise.

Hi,
Please try this
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/troubleshoot-cc-installation- download.html
Under downloads and updates you will see the steps to resolve the error A12E5.
Thanks
Kapil

Cannot open Premiere Pro CC [was:need help]

I cannot open Premiere pro on creative cloud need help

Hi glaustin,
Thanks for contacting adobe forums,
This is could be issue with the Graphics drivers,
Please try to install the latest drivers for the NVIDIA Quadro K3000M with 2GB GDDR5
Click here to download the latest Nvidia Drviers.
Please update if it works or not.
Thanks
Sandee

Best Export / Video settings for Premiere Pro. Help Needed.

What's the best settings when you want to export a video from Premiere Pro for the web or otherwise. Best settings = good quality video and LOW file size.
Benchmark : The videos on Apple Trailers. Check them out at http://www.apple.com/trailers
The trailers are of high quality video, great sounds, and the Large sizes all fall under the 25MB mark. Any ideas on HOW this is done and what
settings in Premiere Pro CS3 might be able to replicate such standards?
Any help is appreciated. I normally use Encoder and export using H264 but that always seems to have an Audio lag. Any similar issues?
Thanks a mil!

I understand that better quality = bigger file size. That's true in most cases, but there is a way around it, I'm just not sure what that way is. As I mentioned in the original post, the benchmark is http://www.apple.com/trailers . The non-HD videos on any movie page on that site hardly ever exceeds the 25MB mark. The videos are 2-3minutes long, and while they may not be top-notch BD visuals, they look way better than 95% of the stuff that's streamed off the net.
That's why I asked if anyone had any ideas on how to replicate something like that. Say I had a avi file of great quality, shot with a Panasonic DV Cam. I Capture the footage, do whatever I have to in Pr, and the result is now a 3minute video. I want it exported to a Quicktime file, I want it to look visually pleasing like the trailers on Apple, and I want it to fall under 25MB. I have tried H.264 encoding, regular Quicktime, and Quicktime via Encoder. Nothing reaches the expected quality.
For more examples visit http://www.passionpictures.com.my/pages/recent.aspx and download those simple 30second clips. All Quicktime, mostly under 5.5MB. If Pr can't do it, then I don't know what can...so I'm sure Pr can do it.
Problem is, how? Experimentation is definitely a way to go, I get that. But on the basis of the scenario given above...how is it done?

My new Pc Build for Premiere Pro Editing. Need opinions!

I have finally saved up enough money for my own Pc build and i need opinions on my parts list. My budget is aprox. $1800-$2000. This is a list I got from a local retail store, prices are taken from Pcpartpicker.
This pc's main use will be editing in Premiere, Photoshop and After Effects, with some Gaming. Also, should I stick with Windows 7 Pro?
Do you guys think this is a good build for the price range? Is there anything i should change?
Many thanks for taking the time to read!
CPU
Intel Core i7-4770K 3.5GHz Quad-Core
$307.27
Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD3H ATX LGA1150
$159.99
Memory
Kingston 16GB (2 x 8GB) DDR3-1600
$119.98
Storage
Crucial M500 240GB 2.5" SSD
$174.29
Seagate Barracuda 3TB 3.5" 7200RPM
$139.99
Video Card
Gigabyte GeForce GTX 660 2GB
$193.98
Sound Card
Creative Labs SB X-Fi Xtreme Audio
$49.99
Case
Cooler Master HAF XM (Black) ATX Mid Tower
$94.00
Power Supply
Corsair 750W ATX12V
$73.98
Optical Drive
Asus BW-14D1XT Blu-Ray/DVD/CD Writer
$84.99
Operating System
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional SP1 (OEM) (64-bit)
$124.00
Total: $1522.46

joshweiland wrote:
What's the bad part? Multiple drives or RAID'ing them?
The bad part that Jim refers to is RAID 0-ing them: If only one of those drives goes bad, all of the data on both or all of the drives in that volume get permanently and irrecoverably lost (unless one wants to spend tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars per disk just for professional data recovery).
On the other hand, the only major disadvantage of multiple smaller drives is that they tend to cost more money overall than one larger drive. What's more, some of the smaller-capacity drives are still of older platter layout designs that are significantly slower in sequential speed than most of the larger-capacity drives (and even those that spin at only 5400 RPM instead of 7200 RPM).

Premiere Pro CC's Warp Stabilizer BUGS...see for yourself. (7.0.1 & 7.1)

I'd love to hear from Adobe Staff on this one. Hopefully they can focus on fixes over features for the next update, especially for one it's most touted effects.
Warp Stabilizer works great at stabilizing clips in Premiere Pro CC...but I'm beginning to learn that it's quite buggy. The two bugs below simply cripple the user experience when you use the effect a lot like we do. Here's a link to a sample project with just 2 clips (around 1 minute in length each) on two separate timelines with each clip stabilized using the Warp Stabilizer effect. It's only a sample/test project meant to show the issue which can be MUCH larger in a longer/bigger project. Relink to any longer media and you'll quickly see what happens when you have multiple warp stabilizers applied to a Premiere Pro CC project and how problematic it can be.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/105331144/Warp_Stabilizer_SAMPLE_Project.prproj
See for yourself.
Two VERY Annoying BUGS and One Unfortunate Feature:
BUG #1: (It affects 7.0.1 and the new 7.1 Release/Update)
1) With GPU Acceleration Enabled and both sequences open, once the timeline render bar has turned yellow, hit save.
2) Now toggle to the 2nd sequence and you'll notice a delay/freeze as the render bar switches back to red and then yellow again.
3) Now toggle back to the other sequence and you have the same thing occur. Then, you can toggle back and forth with no delay...until...the project saves (or auto-saves) again...and then the delay/freeze will happen all over again.
4) Side Note: Even when you right-click on the sequence in the Project window, there's a delay. Right-click on a sequence with no Warp Stabilizers and the drop down list pops up immediately.
What's the Big Deal?: When you have tons more warp stabilizer effects applied to multiple sequences, not only does it take a while to save, but when it does, you are forced to wait while Premiere Pro freezes momentarily. This affects AUTO-SAVE too!!! The more warp stabilizers, the longer the wait. Our sequences have delayed up to 30-40 seconds depending on how much we've used warp stabilizer in each sequence. Imagine if you have Auto-Save set to every 30 minutes or less, well that means that every 30 minutes or less you'll be forced to stop while premiere freezes up for 30-40 seconds or so (depending on how much this effect is used). Other effects do NOT have this issue.
BUG #2: (It affects only the new October Release/Update of Premiere 7.1...this issue is NEW and does NOT occur in 7.0.1!!!)
1) Take the above project into Premiere Pro CC 7.1 (again, this does NOT occur in the previous 7.0.1 release) and hit FILE>EXPORT>Media.
2) You'll notice a delay while the EXPORT SETTINGS popup opens.
3) Toggle to different "FORMATS" in the export settings window and there's more delays every time the format is switched.
What's the Big Deal?: Again, this is a small sample project. When you have a much bigger project with lots more Warp Stabilizers applied to many more clips this "delay" can extend up to several minutes!!! Yes, on a recent project over an hour with MANY warp stabilizers applied to lots of clips, it took 7 minutes for the Export Settings window to pop up after hitting EXPORT>Media. And there was about a one minute delay now when switching formats. This occurs whether GPU Accleration is enabled or not. It ONLY occurs on Premiere Pro CC 7.1
UNFORTUNATE FEATURE #1:
We obviously use Warp Stabilizer A LOT. It's a great effect. The above bugs cripple the user experience. This last issue isn't a bug, but rather a default setting on Premiere Pro's warp stabilizer that should be changed. Within the settings of Warp Stabilizer there's a section called "Method". The default setting is "Subspace Warp". That sounds pretty cool. But in practice, and we have had lots of practice (eg. THOUSANDS of clips stabilized in just the last few months alone (no exaggeration)), we've found that switching the default method to "Position, Scale, Rotation" is a MUCH more effective way to stabilize a clip. Most of the time it cuts down on that "wobble" that you might see in complex moving clips...but more importantly, 9 out of 10 times it crops the video either the same or less than when you use the default method. By "crops less" I mean that the "Auto-Scale %" is less. Of those 9 times, I'd guess 7 or 8 of them would crop in on the video less while the other 1 or 2 times there would be no change to the Auto-Scale %. Less scaling = better.
What's the Big Deal?: Well, as cool as Subspace Warp sounds, our numbers don't lie. Again, we use this effect on HUNDREDS of clips every week. When you have to go into hundreds and hundreds of clips every week and keep switching the setting so the effect will work better, it gets old real fast. We end up wasting so much time doing this but it's worth it because the results are undeniable. Why not create a CUSTOM PRESET???! Well, that'd be nice if it worked...but it doesn't. The problem with a custom preset like that is that when you drop it on a clip, it doesn't activate/analyze the clip automatically so you have to manually go into the settings and hit analyze which negates any time saved. It's be great if the default "method" was simply changed to Position, Scale, and Rotation. Or at the very least, it'd be great if one could create a custom preset that would automatically activate/analyze the clip it's dropped on (just like the original effect does).
(BONUS FEATURE: It'd also be nice to have the ability to set a "max scaling %" too so you never crop in more than a preselected amount...but first things first...fixes over features.)
NOTE: I'm on a 2011 suped up iMac running OSX 10.8.5

[r]Evolution wrote:
Would it help to Render these Warp Stabaliized clips instead of leaving them in the sequence w/ the Effect applied?
Any way to "Batch" Warp Stabalize your media before editing so the effect is not needed during the edit?
Sounds like you guys could benefit from having your shooters use a "Stabalizer".
Thanks for the rendering tip rEvolution. Rendering the clips does help with BUG#1, however, I'm not sure if it would truly save us any time because of the constant need to render and rerender tons of very short clips with this effect as we make adjustments to the edit. Warp Stabilizer is GPU Accelerated so playback is really smooth which is great but why does saving a project have any effect on this and cause it to freeze up? And then it works great...until the next time the project is saved. Using any other effect, there is no issue (that I've found) when a project is saved or auto-saved.
Rendering unfortunately has no effect on BUG#2 in Premiere 7.1 (again, this bug/issue did not occur in Premiere 7.0.1)
Regarding "batch" stabilizing...I'm not entirely sure what you mean. We do stabilize dozens of clips at a time before editing because it's imperative for us to know which clips (the sections we've pulled) will stabilize effectively. And then once the longer edit is complete we end up pulling all the best shots from that long sequence and copy/paste it to another sequence to make a 2nd shorter edit.
To say we've gone back and forth about the use of stabilizers would be an understatement. The fact is that we've spent almost 4 years creating a unique way to shoot based almost entirely around the effectiveness of warp stabilizer. It's taken years of trial and error but our style of shooting effectively allows us to mimick and thus replace the need for stabilizers, sliders and cranes. The extra freedom allows us to get MUCH more varied coverage of live events. It's different, I know, but it's fun and rewarding having a unique style. Granted the extra work is passed on to the editing side, but it's worth it IMO especially if these issues were addressed/fixed.
Regarding the "unfortunate feature" I mentioned, I would be satisfied knowing the default method works great for others if one were simply able to apply a custom preset of the clip with the adjusted method and it activated automatically and began analyzing the clip without the need to manually go into settings and hit analyze. That would be nice.
Thanks again for your input.

Camera Raw like interface for Premiere Pro CC

Hi Adobe
I'm a photographer and video producer looking for an easier way to grade and adjust the levels of my footage in Premiere.
The DynamicLink with SpeedGrade is really lovely and quick, but getting my head around the new SG interface and being able to squeeze the best results out of it is a real challenge. Recently I discovered that I can open video files in Photoshop CC and use the Adobe Camera Raw interface as an effect on the footage and apply colour and levels changes there. This has really opened up the grading process for me and coming from a stills background with several years of using Lightroom to process my photos, I find the Camera Raw interface much more intuitive. It has allowed me to get better results much faster than I was getting out of SpeedGrade. The only issue is the workflow and render time involved in getting the video from Premiere to Photoshop and then back again is drawn out and complex.
My questions are:
Is there a current effect or plugin that replicates the Camera Raw interface and feature set in Premiere Pro / SpeedGrade?
Is this a feature Adobe is looking to include in future updates of Premiere?
It maybe laziness on my behalf not taking the time to learn the interface of SpeedGrade, but I know Adobe is a responsive developer and that this feature would speed up the grading process and would really appeal to the DSLR community who use your products for both photos and videos production.
Thanks in advance
Dan
Dan Murphy
Video Production & Photography
+61 0449 53 9797
www.mandurphy.net

As to quick corrections, a bit of experience in Sg and wow ... what you can do quickly. At first, SpeedGrade ticked me off, couldn't do squat in it. After a bit of learning about how to use scopes & what the goal is in video (very different than stills) ... and learning some of the interface bits ... and getting a Kensington Expert Mouse Trackball (which is a great trackball with a spinner ring and no mouse at all) so it works with the color wheels real spiffy ...and the ease of saving "looks" for my camera's main use stuff ... speed of quick corrections is stunning. "Normalize" ... a couple clicks if that's all you want to do. Keyboard shorts too. All for me, way faster than the 3-Way or Fast.
As to the ACR interface, I went down to NAB in Vegas this spring, got to talk with some of the folks "behind" Sg. And also such things as coming from a stills background, being familiar with the Lightroom and ACR style of panels, wondering if that was possible. Got a pretty good answer ... short answer, "possible" ... well, yes, ... probably.
But ... very, very difficult to do, because of a concatenation of things.
First ... the photo apps (Lr, P-shop, Bridge) are developed by a completely different group of people, EVERYTHING from the "look" or style thinkers to the coders. There is virtually no "code" similarity between the products for stills and the products for video. Think about the differences here ... Photoshop and Lightroom are designed to work on one image at a time, realistically, and allow "batching" instructions to a few others. And they can at times pretty much take over most computer's resources. The video apps are designed to work on (process) THOUSANDS of images at a time, as that's what a clip is, let alone a full sequence of clips. The coding "ideology" for the two is completely different. Even though P-shop has some video handling capability, NONE of the code is anywhere near alike. You can't say "we've got that code here, let's put it in over there ... ".
It would be like thinking you just wanted good power in a little European sportster so you decided to put a big American-built Cummings diesel motor in it. Um ... with enough work & hassle, it actually might be possible. The wisdom of the effort, let alone the happiness you might achieve with the result ... well, it might be worth thinking about before starting. Or at least realizing it's gonna be a ton of work to do.
Second ... resources while running. In stills, if one is technically sharp, one looks at a histogram while "developing" in Lr terminology. That histogram takes next to no resources whatever, works perfectly well. In video, if your aren't looking at least at a good Vectorscope if not also Parade while working, well ... the success of your endeavors let alone the time to create them is going to be ... perhaps ... poor. Probably. Yet those scopes can take quite a bit of resources all by their lonesome. Which is why they have the option to "pause" the scopes while playback is going on, as to keep them going in real-time is a right b-tard. Resource-wise.
Think of what's going in in the video apps: they take your source footage, but only the bits you've selected (but out FROM the whole clip constantly), all the changes & effects you've made, compute instantly for every flipping image at between 24 to 120 per second what it "should" look like, and display that in your playback monitor. This is a load the stills apps don't even think about. And yet, they've got to make these things "look" like there's no difference in getting things to your monitor than the stills programs. It is literally like comparing 18-wheel freight trucks to Maseratis. And expecting the Maserati to carry the load the freight truck does. Hey, the little Maserati may actually have more horsepower,. you know. Why can't it pull that semi-trailer? P-shop has some video capability, why can't you just cut & paste something else from P-shop into Sg?
So ... the long answer is adding some option like the LR/ACR style interface is an intriguing idea even for the Sg "team". However, it would pretty much mean they'd need to rebuild a ton of the program. Now, most of the things you can do within that interface Sg already does, albeit with vastly different code and "tools". When I asked about perhaps just allowing a Secondaries panel with the HSL look out of Lr, one of the main dudes just sort of ... blanched. I would guess from other comments that that little bit has been discussed or something along that line, and ... it would be a "Significant" people-using project to accomplish. From a coding standpoint, some parts of Sg would simply have to be rebuilt. With the appropriate de-bugging needed to get it operational AGAIN on so many different types of hardware/codecs/drivers/OS & etc.
There's times that HSL panel would allow me to easily do precisely what I want ... I would love to have it. I've put in numerous Wish Requests for it. And of course, done so in person. I'm not expecting to see it any time soon, mind you ... but again, put in wish requests for the ACR panel in Sg. Can't hurt.
Neil

Scene Detect not functioning in Premiere Pro CS6

Hello all,
Having an issue with Scene Detect not recognizing individual scenes when I Capture HDV footage from my Canon XH series cameras. Tapes just come in as one long file rather than individual scenes. I am using CS6 on my MAC computers (OS 10.7.5 and 10.6.8).
This is baffling as I've captured many tapes from many weddings and have never experienced this problem to this point.
I did reset my cameras to default settings recently but can't seem to find anything that would indicate that causing the issue. However, it is the only change I have made unless a recent Adobe or OS update could have caused the issue?
Your help and knowledge are greatly appreciated!

Problem solved.
For anyone seeking a possible solution to this simple but incredibly aggravating issue: Make sure your camera's date and time fields are set. Premiere Pro's "Scene Detect" function uses your cameras time signature to differentiate scenes in your captured footage. No time code = no individual scene detection.
When I reset my camera to default settings I erased my time and date fields. I wasn't too worried about it as I typically use these cameras for their HD SDI capability with timecode captured via Tricaster, however this became a frustrating problem when I used the cameras for a recent wedding capture and I now have four long files rather than the intended multiple scenes I need for editing...
Hope this simple discovery makes someone's day a little easier...

Premiere Pro CS6 very bad YouTube quality.

Hello,
Before asking me to look further on google because there may be my answer, i say that i've searched/posted/asked everywhere i could.
I use fraps to record some in-game footages, the file bitrates are huge 500-900M, i then render them in premiere pro as i need to add an intro/ending and then i upload them (or i'm hardly trying to) on youtube.
The thing is I've used every setting I could ever find, contacted youtube users who managed to do it right, but after I upload the video on youtube, the quality is absolutely horrible.
Right after i render i check the video, the quality is perfect, after that I upload it to youtube and after processing the video, it looks like it has 1M bitrate, laggy.
Can anyone please help me to solve this problem?
Thanks!
RAW clip bitrate: 500-900M
Render settings from Premiere Pro CS6:
Format: H264
Resolution: 1280x720
Frames per second: 30
Field Order: Progressive
Aspect: Square Pixels (1.0)
TV Standard: NTSC
Profile: High
Level: 5.1
Render at Maximum depth: Checked
Bitrate settings:
Encoding: VBR, 2 pass
Maximum bitrate: 20M
Minimum bitrate: 20M
(Tried with smaller bitrates too, like 8/10/15, the output file wasnt so clear but youtube would still kill it)

OK. Here is what I have done.
I took took your crisp video of game play and dropped it on the New Item button to create a sequence. I checked the sequence and saw that the video was 1280X720 using 30 frames per second. Not 29.97, but 30. That could be relevant.
Then I took this screen shot of the video playing in Windows Media Player and in the Program Monitor of Premiere Pro. I see some degradation even at 30Mb/s which suprised me to be honest with you. I read through the YouTube help and they recommed 30Mb/s for 720p so I exported at 30Mb/s.
The easiest place to spot the degradation is in the space above the letter E (before the CK) in the upper left of the frame. Some of the texture is missing.Not much. It is ever so much softer. But I don't believe that it will prove to be relevant.
So, now it is time to upload to YouTube and see what happens.
Darn, I have no way to play the YouTube video at exactly 1280X720. I just have full screen and the larger box. Is there a way to do that? Other than setting my monitor for 720p or playing it on an old HDTV?
Oh well, here it is. Reasonably clean going in. How about coming out? Not so much. I am not happy with it. I am going to try again using CBR just for the heck of it. Crud. That didn't help. See for yourself.
I am stumped. Somebody with the capability to see it at the exact size speak up please. How is it done. (I use Chrome.)
Edit: I found a YouTube resizer that sets the medium box bigger - to 1280X720. I knew it had to be possible. But I am certainly not happy with the changes YouTube makes to a 30Mb/s file.
I am off to go try Vimeo.
Edit:
I am not happy with this either.
There is something about this video that makes it difficult for them to encode it. I have no idea what it might be. Perhaps the more technical among us can provide answers. It is not horrible, and it is better than 480p, but it isn't great.

CC Won´t Work, When i open Premiere PRO It Works until i open a project and it closes with no advice

Well i am REALLY dissapointed so far, i just purchased the CC full for one year and i have not been able to use it. First it asks for ******* serials, already did all the steps in the guides you provide.
Now i try to open Premiere Pro CC and it closes unexpectedly when i try to start a project

I do not find any other messages from you, so I do not know what you mean by provided guides... so I will post the links I have and hope one will help
You download & install & activate Cloud programs by logging in to your Cloud account
http://www.adobe.com/products/creativecloud/faq.html
http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/install-apps.html to install or uninstall
http://forums.adobe.com/community/download_install_setup/creative_cloud_faq
what is http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/help/creative-cloud-desktop.html
Cloud Getting Started https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/topics/getting-started.html
For Premiere Pro, More information needed for someone to help... please click below and provide the requested information
-Premiere Pro Video Editing Information FAQ http://forums.adobe.com/message/4200840

Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 crashing when making edits

I everyone. I migrated to Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 (I need to finish a couple of project before I can update the computer to CC and Mac OS 10.8.) and it's been crashing right from the begining. It's a random crash but my impression that it becomes more probable as the projects grow.
It happens whenever I'm editing and I press the shortcut for "overwrite" or "insert". (It also happens when I press the icon or move the clip to the timeline)
The screen message I get is this one:
The log message that I get afterwards goes as follows:
On previous days, I've been able to keep working just by deleting the Media database preview files from Premiere but it's not working anymore.
I'm working with XMF files shot with a Canon C300 synced using premiere to sound files (.wav). It only happens when I try to edit but it doesn't matter if I try to edit sound, sound and image or just image.
What it doesn't make sense is that it says something about "dynamic lynk" and, as far as I know, I'm not using dynamic link at all.
Thanks in advance for your time and wisdom
Jaime From Spain

Now, a few updates after a very long night (just in case it might help somebody)
Up until last night, I was saving my Premiere Projects in a Dropbox Folder inside my computer. It was a quick safe way of having a backup copy. Well, it seems that the crash is somehow related. Don't ask me why but once I moved the project file to a regular hard drive (actually a RAID0 where I keep my heavier files) the crashes have stopped.
This morning I went back to the dropbox idea with a new project and -Voilá!- after three hours of work, it crashed again. I moved the file to the RAID disk and no more crashes. My guess is that it is somehow related to the auto-save files that premiere keeps saving. Once it reaches a certain amount (around 20 in my experience) dropbox and Premiere start to do something weird and they crash the software... (It might be related to the software dropbox uses to keep your folders updated and keep backup versions of everything)
I'll run a few tests next week trying to keep the Auto-save files out of dropbox and just the regular files there to see what happens.
Best regards
Jaime

Help with export/import in premiere pro

Hi Everyone
I have a question about import and export in Premiere Pro CS5.
I have some 1920*1080 .mov-files shot with canon eos 500d.
What is the best import setting for premiere pro cs5?
What is the best export setting from premiere pro (to adobe encore) to dvd?
The film is going to be projected on to a big screen. How do I get the best quality for this?
I would be very very thankful for your help!
Tami

check your paused and/or playback resolution settings...
I've found TIFF to be the cleanest output from PPT for inclusion in video, and I've also found that the scale to frame size command usually works pretty well within Premiere. However, Photoshop's scaler uses much better algorithms and will give you a much better result. You can do a batch process on all your files and automatically create smaller versions of them if you'd like. Alternatively, you can open PPT and customize the size of your PPT slide, which should scale everything to fit your new size. Then you'll have native 720x480 TIFFs on export from PPT.

Setting up Premiere Pro 2.0, Need an expert!

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for