Shared Members Alias
Hello,
I am facing problems while creating / removing aliases of shared members in Essbase outline.
1) What is the best possible way to create aliases for shared members (already present in the outline not new ones) ?
2) What is the best possible way to remove aliases for exisitng shared members in the outline ?
Any leads greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Neetesh
Hi.
The Easiest Way of Doing it is by Parent-Child References..
COnstruct a Data File using Parent child Reference and then Add a Third Column in which you provide Alias name.
In the Field Property of Third Column make is as Alias and tag it to proper dimension and in Dimension build Setting go to Dimension Build tab and check "Allow property changes".
In case of Removing Alias just create Another Column in Rule File And Leave it Blank
Then in its Field Propety Check "Delete When Field is Empty".
Similar Messages
-
Shared Members Alias Names Need to be Deleted--Essabase Admin Console
The company I work for set up shared members with alias names. I need to get rid of the alias names so that they are linked to their proper stored members and take on those names. How do I do this without haveing to go to every contton-picking shared member and delete the alias name?
Thanks!981103 wrote:
The company I work for set up shared members what do you mean by "shared members"?
with alias names. what do you mean by 'alias names' and what do said 'alias names' refer to?
I need to get rid of the alias names so that they are linked to their proper stored members and take on those names. How do I do this without haveing to go to every contton-picking shared member and delete the alias name?
Thanks!And since you mention in the subject line 'essbase admin console', what does any of this have to do with oracle databases? -
Drill down on shared members.
Hi ,
I have some filters associated to geography hierarchy in my essbase cube.
my geography heirarchy looks like this.
geography
|_base_members
|_am
|_Apac
|_shared_members
|_am (Alias: America) (shared members)
|_ ..etc
|_Apac (Alias: Asia pac) (shared members)
now i have created filters giving meta read access on shared members in the above case on .users of america will only see america region.
but when i drill down and drill up on the member in the report in web analysis, it gives me an unknown member error "am".
i tried by giving same access to the base members but the report shows the base members.
is there any other way to handle this error.
thanks.Try deleting Non-Corporate Income before you drill into Total Revenue. Or turn off Retain selected member in your drill options. The problem is that if Essbase sees Non-Corporate Income, then it knows it is the alternate roll up and correctly does not drill on Total Revenue. Remove Non-Corporate Income and Total Revenue, just becomes plain old Total Revenue and you should be able to drill on that.
-
ODI - Delete Shared Members?
Hello,
I load a node in a Planning dimension with Shared Members using an ODI Interface. We have a need to remove all of these Shared Members before we perform the load. Is it then possible to remove all Shared Members from specific locations using ODI? I know that we can run the Delete Shared Members utility from the server where Planning is installed, but that is not possible for admin users who do not have admin rights to the server. Version 11.1.1.2, ODI version 10.1.3.
Thanks in advance,
SteveJohn,
Thanks for the reply. The dimension is in a Planning Application/database. I have a parent/child/Alias txt file that I used to load the dimension node with. Are you saying that it is possible to create an ODI interface that can "Delete Level 0" members? Below is a sample of the dimension via planning/dimensions. In this example, I would want to remove all members under the "COGS" node....or all "Shared Members". Below is also a sample of the file used to load the Shared Members.
Thanks again,
Steve
DEPT_SEC All Departments Depts Store View 4
COGS Cost of Sales Depts Store 4
D00400(Shared) Management Buffer - COGS (D00400) Shared 4
D10013(Shared) ELE Las Vegas - COGS (D10013) Shared 4
D10020(Shared) IT Infrastructure Eng COGS-SJC (D10020) Shared 4
D10030(Shared) CCV Call Ctr-Customer Service (D10030) Shared 4
Parent Child Description Status
Entities DEPT_SEC All Departments
DEPT_SEC COGS Cost of Sales
DEPT_SEC G&A G&A
DEPT_SEC NO_DEPTID No DeptID
DEPT_SEC R&D R&D
DEPT_SEC S&M S&M
COGS 00400 Management Buffer - COGS A
COGS 10013 ELE Las Vegas - COGS A -
Aliases for shared members in Smartview
Hi All Gurus,
I am using Oracle EPM 11.1.2.3. I migrated an EPMA planning application from 11.1.2.2 to 11.1.2.3. The Alias for Shared members are not getting displayed When I access through Smartview ,instead it is showing as [Parent].[child] . But When I access the same application in 11.1.2.2, I can see the Alias.
How to fix this?It is been identified as a bug have a read of this Oracle - Hyperion Labs......: Smart View issues with alternate Hierarchy - Surprises in Essbase Part V
Regards
Celvin
http://www.orahyplabs.com -
Aliases on Shared Members not in Essbase
<p>I used HAL to create alternate rollups using shared members inmy Accounts dimension and in a custom dimension (Customers). The aliases for the shared members appear in Planning, butafter refreshing Essbase, the aliases are not in Essbase; only themember names. When I add a shared member manually inPlanning, the alias is populated in Essbase. Does anyone havean idea of how to get the aliases in Essbase?</p>
<p>I realize that the alias will display when reporting on it. The reason it came up is because you can't see the alias whenperforming a member selection. It's an inconvenience, not ashow stopper. I just thought it was strange that the aliaswould go into Essbase when the shared member was added manually,but not when added using HAL. Seems like a bug to me.</p>
-
Hi,
How can i add alias to shared members ?
Cube Type : ASO
ThanksIt works for sure in BSO.
Have you tried to do it in ASO?
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour -
How to build shared members using Rules file
hi all,
we have a source file like below,in that Bold members are shared member. we doknow how to modify the source file for building shared members using Rules file.
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Lightbolt 365 A*
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Lightbolt 540 A*
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Lightbolt 730 A*
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Thunderball 365 A*
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Thunderball 270 A*
Conf Total,~,Config A,*Roadranger 123 A*
Can anyone give suggestion to resolve this issue.
Thanks in Advancehi John,
Here i'm building the dimension through generation build method.
setting the properties as
Field, Dimension, Field Type, Field Number
Field1,Product,Generation,2
Field2,Product,property,2
Field3,Product,Generation,3
Field4,Product,Generation,4
After mapping it shows dimensions are correctly mapped.
When i load the source file and the rule file, it shows error partially loaded data,.And it doesn't shows the shared member property. That is what asked How to modify the source file for building shared members using Rules file.
Thanks,
Edited by: user@99 on 25-May-2010 15:37 -
How to see Shared Members in Smart View on Ad-hoc Analysis mode
Hi All,
We are using Hyperion Planning v 11.1.1.3.
For the alternate hierarchy we have created shared members. But in Smart View we are unable to see Shared members hierarchy in Ad-hoc analysis mode.
Is this limitation in Hyperion Planning?
Or
Is there any way to see shared members Hierarchy in Smart View in Ad-hoc analysis mode?
It is urgent requirement Please let me know as early as possible
Thanks in Advance!!!When you say open data form in Ad-hoc mode, can you do that? I think when you select Ad-hoc mode, you are basically connecting to Essbase and therefore need to manually select the members. (of course, I've got a 11.1.2 env right now so not too sure of 11.1.1.3)
I'm able to just go to Member Selection and select whatever hierarchy i want, Shared or Stored, when I'm connected to Essbase. When connecting to Planning, I dont have any option of opening the form as Ad-hoc mode.
Can you see the hierarchy if selecting the members using Essbase connection and not planning?
Cheers,
Abhishek -
Level building/shared members
Can you generate shared members when level building your dimensions?
I'm afraid I have to disagree with the previous 2 posters. You can build shared members when you use a level build method. I do it all the time. Assume your level zero member is in a primary and secondary rollup and that there are 3 parents in the firs rollup and 2 in the second, the format of the load rule would be:
Lev0,Lev1,Lev2,Lev3,lev1,Lev2 -
Shared members and dynamic calc
I am trying to replicate a new cube from current GL cube and wish to remove unused shared members if they have any impact on essbase.
2/3 of my accounts (dense) member is stored with the remainder being shared members. Shared members do not add to block size. But having so many of them, does it impact on calc scripts or retrievals or any other impacts?
Secondly, in accounts and divisions, we have four levels. except for level 0, the remaining levels are all dynamic calc. Division is sparse member. Its not advisable to have dynamic calc on dense dimension. What about sparse dimension like division? Will it be better to change level 2&3 to dynamic and change level 1 to store as well?
We have also been advised by our consultant to change accounts to sparse dimension considering the number of times we need to update outline for new members (stored and shared).
Dimension Type Stored Shared
Measure Dense 1378 796 rest
Time Dense 106 13 rest
Year Dense 9 8
Currency Sparse 12 9
Scenario Sparse 41 38
Market Sparse 20 12
Division Sparse 490 302 rest
Product Sparse 635 308
Reportcode Sparse 327 299Hi,
Having shared members in dense hierarchy will not have much of impact on Cube size or retrieval performance.
but its always advisable to avoid unnecessary hierarchies (shared or stored or dynamic).
Having top level dense members as dynamic lines is a good design but having sparse dynamic calc will impact retrieval performance.
its not at all advisable to make sparse members as dynamic calc but if needed we can make sparse members with very few children as dynamic calc (or dynamic calc & store). yet again its not advisable to have a dynamic calc children to a sparse stored parent as this will affect the batch calculation while aggregating parent sparse member.
And as suggested by your consultant it is feasible to make the dimension getting modified more often, as a sparse dimension as this will reduce the restructuring time (sparse restructure will take less time compared to dens restructure).
But that alone cannot be considered as factor as there are many other factors to be considered for making a dimension sparse.
- Krish -
Is there any API for Shared Members
Hi All ,
Can any one let me know whether there is any API function for Shared Members? I could not find anything from http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12032_01/doc/epm.921/html_api/api_c/mac/tocmacfa.htm
Please do help...Thanks in advanceI am assuming you are on 9.2 as that is the link you posted, all the details you need are in the docs - http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E12032_01/doc/epm.921/html_api/topapilist.htm
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Building RULES file to load shared members in Aggregate storgage outline
Hi there
I posted this yesterday (sorry, somewhat different subject description). I am trying to create an alternate hierarchy containing shared members using a load rule and flat file in an Aggregate Storage outline. One response was to remove the "allow moves" option and use parent child build in the load rule. I tried that and it did not work. i was pointed to a section in the essbase guide (which is about as clear as mud), and still cannot get this to work. First of all - can you do this with an ASO outline? If so, how? I tried a simple 6 line flat file and recreated the load rule based on the above recommendations and it will not the shared members. Can someone out there help?
thanksHere is an example in the simplest form.
Create Aso db (duplicate members names not selected)
Create Product dimension member, set to "Multiple Hieararchies Enabled", (though probably would work if dynamic)
Create load rule, set as parent/child dimension build for product, make sure allow moves is not ticked.
Data file
Parent,Child
100,100-20
200,200-20
Diet,100-20
Assign field properties in rule for Parent.Child
Load data, 100-20 will be created as shared.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/ -
Multiple hierarchies with shared members
Hello,
is it just a common practice to have unique parents for hierarchies built on the same Essbase dimension, or it is a system level restriction?
Only in Hyperion Planning, or this is true also on Essbase level?
Is it right that only the leaf nodes can be shared members?
(automatic shared members are created on higher levels for parents with 1 child, so why other shared members not allowed?)
Thank you for your answer!I'm not sure I follow your question completely, but for shared member rollups the lowest level of the shared rollup can be a level zero or higher member or another dimension. The requirement is that a shared member can not have descendants in the shared rollup, it would be the lowest level.
For example If I have the following primary rollup
Geography
East
NJ
NY
PA
West
Ca
OR
WA
I could have an alternamte rollup like
Bob's Total
NY (Shared)
West (Shared)
You see thar NY is a level zero member and West is a level 1 member but under the alternate rollup the are both level zero members -
EPMA Shared Members not reflecting in Planning application post deployment
Hi,
I have added a member in 'Entity' dimnesion. The same member is also added in an alternate hiererchy as shared member (Using Insert member option in dimension library). When I refresh the application view, I do see both the original member and shared member in application vieiw. But post deployment, only the base member is reflected in planning application and not the shared member.
I have redeployed the application multiple times now, but i am still not able to see the shared members reflected in Planning application.
Kindly let me know if you have any idea on the same or faced a similar issue?
Regards
MeenalHi,
Have you patched up EPMA with patches from Metalink3
9.3.1.1 Patch includes -
6897835 SHARED MEMBERS IN ENTITY DIMENSION CAN NOT BE DEPLOYED TO ASO/BSO APPS
It is advisable to keep a look out for patch fixes with EPMA
Hope this helps
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/
Maybe you are looking for
-
Printer not supporting Polish and Danish Characters
Hi, We have a printer with model Intermec PM4i used for label printing. We have a suitable customized device type for this printer. This device type works fine with other printers. The problem with the printer is that it does not support Polish (Pola
-
MacBook Pro Connection Problem
I just purchased a new MacBook Pro and when i took my laptop to my college to do some homework it said i could not connect to the internet because it was not secure. I know the school has secure wifi, what can i do or what does that mean?M
-
I am wondering what tools were used in the "Body Evolution" video
Hi, I am wondering what the names of the tools that were used in the "Body Evolution" video? I know somw of them, but I don't know what tools they used for the eyes, nose and to stretch the legs. Thank you!
-
how can i get my calls transferred to my voicemail when i am listening to my meditation music on my iphone?
-
Hi Experts, I need to disable the "Create Batch" button (CREATE_BATCH) in ME22N. I have tried the screen exit in MM06E005 for SAPLXM06 0111. But it does not seems to work and documentation specifies that it cannot change standard fields. Is there any