Shared members' properties not flowing automatically

Hi,
We are developing hierarchies in Drm11.1.2.2
Wherein we have primary members and also shared members in our hierarchy to be built on ...for the properties part let's say for ex I have description-lob as a local property that inherits a global property description-input ...note:values at global properties not to be changed...hence lob ...when the members are created as primary members with their respective properties... The shared members do not inherit the properties from the primary member... How do we get inherit it automatically... Note: description-lob is a overridden property... Please help me asap with your ideas...
Thanks

Hello Scorp,
I've tried to understand and here's what i understood.. The Description-LOB is a defined Inheriting or probably a Overridable derived property.  Now taking each case differently -
Note- The Shared members will not "Inherit" the values from their primaries unless they are among its descendants and which typically doesn't make sense from an alternate structure view.
If it is a defined property it will not reflect on the Shared member automatically, if my memory serves me right the Leaf property is the only one which is common.
Now having said that, the only possibility is that of a overridable derived property, now for that you need to put in a condition in your formula to check for Shared members separately, Check for the Core.SharedFlag_MDM  which is True for Shared members and False for Primaries you can do something like this.
If(PropValue(Core.SharedFlag_MDM),
NodePropValue(PropValue(Core.PrimaryName_MDM),Custom.YourProperty),
PropValue(Custom.YourProperty))
Let me know if I have deviated from your question.
Thanks
Denzz

Similar Messages

  • Business Area not flowing automatically in Shipment Cost document

    Hi there,
    In transportation module, while creating shipment cost document, business area is not flowing automatically. Upon more exploration we found that plant is also not flowing, and may be because of that business area is not flowing. What can the posible reasons for plnt not flowing? Suggest solution.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Deepshikha

    Dear Deepshikha,
    Please check the Assign purchasing data settings in T_53 transaction with the combination of the plant.
    Through this setting plant will flow in the shipment cost document.
    I don't have idea about where the businees area field avail in the shipment cost document.
    If so please chek the settings related to business area through this IMG path.
    SPRO>IMG>Enterprise structure>Assignment>Business Area Account Assignment.
    Define Rules By Sales Area
    If Rule 1 is assigned then
    Assign Business Area To Plant And Division
    If Rule 2 is assigned then
    Assign Business Area by Sales Area.
    I hope it will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Workflow not flowing automatically

    Hi All,
    I am new to workflow, I am currenty using Notifications functionality coming under Cross Application components . I have activate the workflow under Activate Workflow Template node in IMG . Now the problem is that when i save notification with or without tasks the workflow doesn't start automatically instead I have to go to change notifications(IQS9) and start the workflow manually and then it triggers the workflow.
    Is there is any settings I can do whereby the workflow is triggered automatically as soons as I save the notifications. I am using General Notifications. Object Type BUS7051 and workflow template  -3100019   & 20001028
    thanks
    Vishesh Singhvi

    Hi
    I have resolved the problem, it was not activating automatically because TRFC settings were not made .
    regards,
    Vishesh Singhvi

  • Tax code Value not flowing automatically in PO condition type

    Hi ,
    In purchase order Tax value (14.42%+VAT) is not automatically Copied in  to the
    JEXS condition type .(Taxes on PO). Please help me how to resolve this issue.
    Regards
    Uma

    Hi,
    Thanks for the immediate reply. We have changed the settings as per your reply. But still system is not taking the value. Please revert back with further more valued inputs.
    Regards
    Uma

  • Access on Shared Members not working in reports

    In our entity dimensions, we have all of our base members listed in under a parent folder, with permission assigned to each base member to allow access (not at the folder level).
    We then have another parent folder which includes Regions, and then the base members are included under the appropriate region as a shared members. On the Region folders, we have iDescendants access setup for all the shared members.
    When running reports, if a user who has access to the Region folders selects the Region folder, then they can see a consolidated report for all the shared members, but if they click on a specific shared member, they cannot see any numbers.
    It looks like those shared members are not inheriting permissions from the parent folder. This was working before, and recently stopped.
    Does anyone know what needs to be done to get the permission to start inheriting from the parent folder to the shared members?

    Did a Refresh on Shared Members from Planning > Administration > Manage Database and this solved this issue.

  • Excise duty values not flowing from PO to MIGO

    All SAP Gurus,
    We have created a PO and used excisable tax code in it.
    Excise duties are calculated correctly in PO.
    When we go for Goods receipt against the PO, excise tab appears, but there are no values in excise fields (fiels are blank).
    System allows us to enter the Excise duty values manually.
    Further excise entries and register updates are happening correcetly.
    We do not undersatnd why the Excise duty values are not flowing automatically from PO to GR (MIGO).
    Please help.
    Regards,

    hi
    chekc following
    path: spro>logistic general >tax on goods movements>india >basic settings>determination of excise duty >maintain excise defaults >
    here give appripriate conditions for ur procedure as per BED   cess and other
    regards
    kunal

  • Shared members and dynamic calc

    I am trying to replicate a new cube from current GL cube and wish to remove unused shared members if they have any impact on essbase.
    2/3 of my accounts (dense) member is stored with the remainder being shared members. Shared members do not add to block size. But having so many of them, does it impact on calc scripts or retrievals or any other impacts?
    Secondly, in accounts and divisions, we have four levels. except for level 0, the remaining levels are all dynamic calc. Division is sparse member. Its not advisable to have dynamic calc on dense dimension. What about sparse dimension like division? Will it be better to change level 2&3 to dynamic and change level 1 to store as well?
    We have also been advised by our consultant to change accounts to sparse dimension considering the number of times we need to update outline for new members (stored and shared).
    Dimension          Type          Stored     Shared
    Measure               Dense     1378     796     rest
    Time               Dense     106     13     rest
    Year               Dense     9     8     
    Currency          Sparse     12     9     
    Scenario          Sparse     41     38     
    Market               Sparse     20     12     
    Division          Sparse     490     302     rest
    Product               Sparse     635     308     
    Reportcode          Sparse     327     299

    Hi,
    Having shared members in dense hierarchy will not have much of impact on Cube size or retrieval performance.
    but its always advisable to avoid unnecessary hierarchies (shared or stored or dynamic).
    Having top level dense members as dynamic lines is a good design but having sparse dynamic calc will impact retrieval performance.
    its not at all advisable to make sparse members as dynamic calc but if needed we can make sparse members with very few children as dynamic calc (or dynamic calc & store). yet again its not advisable to have a dynamic calc children to a sparse stored parent as this will affect the batch calculation while aggregating parent sparse member.
    And as suggested by your consultant it is feasible to make the dimension getting modified more often, as a sparse dimension as this will reduce the restructuring time (sparse restructure will take less time compared to dens restructure).
    But that alone cannot be considered as factor as there are many other factors to be considered for making a dimension sparse.
    - Krish

  • Shared Members

    Is there any way in which you can use a filter to look at just Shared Members and not the original members?we have looked at this and believe that it is not possible on the basis that whenever you drill down in Excel, you can see the values for the shared members and the original members as well.It would be great to confirm that the above is True, or even better, provide a solution to the problem.

    When you drill down from a parent member, you should be viewing the child members and if that is shared memebers then that is what you will see.The data value of the shared member and the origianl member is always the same. The roll ups will have differnet values. So I am not sure what you mean when you say the shared value and the origianl value are visible. Please clarify.Thanks.

  • Excluding Shared members from calculations

    Hi,How can I exclude shared members from calculations so that shared members are not calculated twice?Regards

    Hi Mayank,
    Try *SELECT
    *SELECT(%H%,"[ID]",HR_ACCOUNT,"[ID]<>Shift,Education_Assist")
    *XDIM_MEMBERSET HR_ACCOUNT=%H%
    Vadim
    P.S. Or:
    *SELECT(%H%,"[ID]",HR_ACCOUNT,"[ID]<>Shift AND [ID]<>Education_Assist")
    Both will work
    Message was edited by: Vadim Kalinin - P.S. Added

  • Aliases for shared members in Smartview

    Hi All Gurus,
    I am using Oracle EPM 11.1.2.3. I migrated an EPMA planning application from 11.1.2.2 to 11.1.2.3. The Alias for Shared members are not getting displayed When I access through Smartview ,instead it is showing as [Parent].[child] . But When I access the same application in 11.1.2.2, I can see the Alias.
    How to fix this?

    It is been identified as a bug have a read of this Oracle - Hyperion Labs......: Smart View issues with alternate Hierarchy - Surprises in Essbase Part V
    Regards
    Celvin
    http://www.orahyplabs.com

  • HT6389 How do family members in Family Sharing download a Not Shareable App for their own account?

    I have downloaded an app (Uber) in the past, but my wife has not.  I set up Family Sharing with my wife.  Uber is set as a Not Shareable app, and the problem is that my wife can't download the app even when she goes to it in the app store.  It shows the iCloud icon as if she already downloaded it, even though she hasn't, and she gets an error when trying to download it.  Turning off Family Sharing also did not solve the problem (although I did not wait that long, and maybe I need to wait longer after disabling family sharing).  But there should be a better way for her to get the app than switching off family sharing.
    On a separate note, I am trying to post this question here:  
    HT6389: Which purchased content can I share using Family Sharing
    Learn about Which purchased content can I share using Family Sharing
    but the forum doesn't seem to let me do that.

    Thanks for the responses.  I actually ended up turning off Family Sharing because I found this to be really annoying, and for other reasons.  I was able to download Uber for my wife from iTunes on her PC laptop with Automatic App Downloads turned on on her iPhone.
    The other problem I'm having, and the reason I switched off Family Sharing, is with store credit.  I have a lot of gift card credit on my account, but when my family makes purchases, the gift card credit is not deducted first before charging my card.  Not sure if there is a way to change that but I couldn't figure it out.

  • EPMA Shared Members not reflecting in Planning application post deployment

    Hi,
    I have added a member in 'Entity' dimnesion. The same member is also added in an alternate hiererchy as shared member (Using Insert member option in dimension library). When I refresh the application view, I do see both the original member and shared member in application vieiw. But post deployment, only the base member is reflected in planning application and not the shared member.
    I have redeployed the application multiple times now, but i am still not able to see the shared members reflected in Planning application.
    Kindly let me know if you have any idea on the same or faced a similar issue?
    Regards
    Meenal

    Hi,
    Have you patched up EPMA with patches from Metalink3
    9.3.1.1 Patch includes -
    6897835 SHARED MEMBERS IN ENTITY DIMENSION CAN NOT BE DEPLOYED TO ASO/BSO APPS
    It is advisable to keep a look out for patch fixes with EPMA
    Hope this helps
    John
    http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

  • Aliases on Shared Members not in Essbase

    <p>I used HAL to create alternate rollups using shared members inmy Accounts dimension and in a custom dimension (Customers). The aliases for the shared members appear in Planning, butafter refreshing Essbase, the aliases are not in Essbase; only themember names.  When I add a shared member manually inPlanning, the alias is populated in Essbase.  Does anyone havean idea of how to get the aliases in Essbase?</p>

    <p>I realize that the alias will display when reporting on it. The reason it came up is because you can't see the alias whenperforming a member selection.  It's an inconvenience, not ashow stopper.  I just thought it was strange that the aliaswould go into Essbase when the shared member was added manually,but not when added using HAL.  Seems like a bug to me.</p>

  • RENN item not flowing in return sales order automatically

    Hi all,
    When i add RENN in item category proposal for copy control of billing doc to sales doc(YDRE to YDF2) where YDRE is return and YDF2 is outbound billing. So when I create a return order with reference to invoice will the free good item flow automatically in the return sales order or is there any other configuration???

    Hi Avishek,
    Check your item category assignment first that renn is properly assigned to your
    Order type u2013 item category group u2013 usage u2013 item category at higher level.
    You can do this from the path
    IMG u2013 sales and distribution u2013 sales u2013 sales documents u2013 sales document item u2013 assign item category.
    Do this setting first then go copying control with the following path.
    IMG u2013 sales and distribution u2013 sales u2013 Maintain copy control for sales document.
    Search for your sales document type YDRE from billing document YDF2.
    Go to the item level and search for item category used in billing document.
    Go to the detail of that item category you will find item category proposal.
    Write down over there RENN.
    Now try to create the return sales order it will happen.
    This setting you have to do so that it will automatically determine in sales order.
    Regards
    Raj.

  • Work Flow EVENT - SM58 Entries are not executing automatically

    Hi Experts,
    I have used the standard BOR2034 for creating PO after saving the contract.
    I have developed an RFC enabled FM refering to the Standard FM SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT.
    Inside the custom FM I am calling the BAPI_PO_CREATE1 for creating PO.
    After creating a contract using VA41 I am able to see in Event trace that my Event with corresponding custom FM is triggering.
    and the two entries are created in SM58 - Transactional RFC one is my Custom FM name and another is SWF_EVT_HANDLER_START_INTERNAL.
    When I execute the LUW by selecting execution, PO is getting created. Where as this entries are not picking automatically.
    I want to know, whether I have missed any step in process or do we need to schedule any job for automatically clearing the SM58 queue entries.
    Please help me in resolving the issue.
    Responses are highly appreciated..
    Warm Regards...

    Hi Natasha,
    As you say that you see the below entries in TRFC monitor, you need have a commit work after the below FMs are called(just one will do),
    the two entries are created in SM58 - Transactional RFC one is my Custom FM name and another is SWF_EVT_HANDLER_START_INTERNAL.
    How and from where are the above FMs called?
    Regards,
    Chen

Maybe you are looking for