Shortfall of 85 days against SLED in current item

Dear Masters
while doing goods receipt for some of materials it troughing an error like
Shortfall of 85 days against SLED in current item, may be this is due to batch expiry.
so how to rectify this.

Check the batch search strategy settings in t.code MBC2. May be this setting, is providing this message. If so then change the data regarding SLED check and then try to do the goods receipt again.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • Re:Shortfall of 3 Days against SLED in current item (22.01.2010)

    Dear All,
    I am recieving this message when I am trying to do a GR against a process order.
    The order qty.: 150
    ist GR was for 50. there was not problem But today when I am tring to do the second GR against this order the system is giving me this message.
    In  the mat. master data maintaed is :
    shelf life: 10 day
    min. rem. shelf life:1 day
    based on that if I put the actual date. of mfg. I get the message: Shortfall of 3 Days against SLED in current item (22.01.2010)
    & if I put today date as the date of mfg. I get the message: Production date of bch NG9003 (12.01.2010) does not match the prod. date entered (25.01.2010)
    I believe that in the first case the system has found the material to be expired & in the second case there is a conflict in the date of mfg.
    Please advice how to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Vivek

    Query resolved.

  • Shortfall of 181 days against remaining shelf life in current item(18Month)

    Hi All,
             When performing a GR for PO, where purchase info record was maintained with minimum remaining shelf life of 18 M. On performing the GR, system throws up an error message 'Shortfall of 181 days against remaining shelf life in current item(18Month)', when the production date was entered 07/27/2009. What does this error message mean and how is the 181 days calculated ?
    Regards,
    PSS

    >
    PSS wrote:
    >When performing a GR for PO, where purchase info record was maintained with minimum remaining shelf life of 18 M. On performing the GR, system throws up an error message 'Shortfall of 181 days against remaining shelf life in current item(18Month)', when the production date was entered 07/27/2009. What does this error message mean and how is the 181 days calculated ?
    First understand concept of minimum remaining shelf life.
    Minimum shelf life does not has direct relation with info record. It comes from/ system calculate it based on Material master --> Plant data/ storage 1 --> Field name: "Minimum rem. shelf life". It shows - Minimum amount of time for which the material must keep upon GR for the goods receipt to be accepted by the system.
    In Material master --> Plant data/ store 1 --> Field name: "Total shelf life".  It shows - "Period for which the material will keep in total, that is, from the date of production to the shelf life expiration date"
    Now at the time of GRN once you enter Date of manufacture then base on material master --> total shelf life system will calculate "SLED/ BBD".
    Based on this calculation system through this message of "shortfall of 181 days".
    If you still have confusion please let me know what you have entre in material master --> for minimum rem. shelf life & total shelf life. So I can reply you with exact calculation.
    Hope this helps.
    Thanks!!!

  • Shortfall of 818 days against remaining shelf life

    Hi Experts:
    I am trying to perform MIGO for an inbound delivery coming from a Scheduling Agreement.  I got the errror "shortfall of 818 days against remaining shelf life". I checked the material master, the shelf life of the material is 182 days only. How could it be? I would appreciate receiving solutions to the problem.

    hi,
    Pls check some points:
    You enter the shelf life data into the storage view of the material master record. This data includes:
    Maximum time a material can be stored
    Minimum shelf life a material must have available to be accepted by the system
    Percentage of the total shelf life that must still be available if the goods are to be sent to another distribution point
    Time unit used for the shelf life data (days, weeks or years)
    Total number of days that the goods can be kept u2013 from production to the shelf life expiration date...
    If anything else will soon update it..
    Regards
    Priyanka.P
    AWARD IF HELPFULL

  • Shortfall of X days against remaining shelf life

    Hi Gurus,
    User is not able to post MIGo for a particular material and Erro what he is getting is ' short fall of 218 days against remaining shelf life in cuurent item'.
    Material detail:(current data in system)
    Total shelf life: 730 days
    Min rem shelf life: 90days
    Inspection interval date: 90 days
    But, Older data :
    Total shelf life: 730 days
    Min rem shelf life: 365 days
    Inspectin interva date: 365 days
    The material production date what we have to enter in MIGO is 01.09.2007 and expiration date as 31.08.2009.
    Please suggest me if the old material data is affecting Material doc posting or have i missed any setting?

    Hi Jurgen,
    Delivery date is in Day format.
    I for got to add one more information, The PO is created using a old PR nu,ber: This PR was created for the material when it had older data ( Min rem life of 365 days).
    Since user is referring this old PR for creating the PO, is it affecting the GR process?

  • Keyboard shortcuts: current day and date, and current time?

    I would like to know keyboard shortcuts for entering current day and date, and current time (separated entries) in Numbers. Something that Excel does easily. Thank you, Ian

    Ian,
    Numbers does not have predefined key command for Insert Date & Time as you can see from this screenshot:
    All menus show the key commands on the very right (if there is a ke command).  You can add you own, custom, key commands by opening system preferences and selecting the Keyboard panel, then the "Keyboard Shortcuts" segment:
    Click the "+" then a modal dialog will appear.   Select the application from the pop, then enter the exact name if the menu item, and, finally, your desired key combination:
    You can do this for any application

  • Not more than one service order against same sales document item

    A service order gets created against the sales order item as per
    standard SAP process. As credit management is active, when the order
    is under credit block  for the customer the service order gets created only after the
    credit block is released.
    On revising the order line value the sales document goes for a block
    again. Service order is locked. Both seem to be logical.
    But on releasing the credit block  this time ,  it creates one more service order against the same sales order item. Would logically expect the service order is
    unlocked on release from credit block.
    Can u pls explain this behavior ??  How do u avoid a new order creation and unlocking of the service order when the credit block is released.
    Would like to avoid any change in the service order status once it has been created irrespective of subsequent credit status of the sales order.
    regards
    Ramanujam

    Hi  lisa ,
    It is not possible to enter more than one service performer for a service in sales order .
    But you can  perform the service with two people and have two service confirmations.
    The time entered in service confirmation will be reflected in invoice only(if time and material).
    Also you cannot enter the time sheet with respect to sales order , it is only valid for project task and
    and time types.
    Regards,
    Harish

  • The  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the

    Hi All,
    While executing  t.code FBL3N,the  vendor code is not coming against some Assignment line items with the GL A/C4607000, some line items it is coming.
    The GL A/c 4607000 is GR/IR clearing a/c.
    Please let us know  why this situation is happeing at the time of FBL3N.
    Thanks
    Ram

    HI,
    By activating the special fields you can the vendor number, but use the new reprot called "FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New) ".
    First go to SPRO> Financial Accounting (New)> General Ledger Accounting (New)--> Master Data > G/L Accounts>Line Items --> Define Special Fields for Line Item Display
    Click on New Entries -
    Table - BSEG - Field - LIFNR
    Save. Now execute the report - FAGLL03 - Display/Change Items (New)
    Give the gl account number and execute.
    After getting the line items list from menu select --Settings --> Special Fields --> Click on New Entries --> Enter Table BSEG, Field Name LIFNR.
    After this come back and execute again. It will give you the vendor number.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Shashi Kanth.

  • No cost booking against sales order+line item once accontng release is done

    Dear all,
    I want to stop all cost bookings against a sales order + line item once the accounting release for that item has been done.
    By cost booking i mean, all such transactions that are done for a sales order + line item that involve cost booking. Like, MB1A should not allow any goods issue against that sales order + item once accounting release is done.
    Is it possible to that in sales order? Like by using any status at item level.
    Please guide.
    regards
    SAPshed

    Hi Ajay,
    We have not kept automatic cost estimate marking during saving of sales order as costing dept wants  to confirm whether costing for the SO is correct or not.
    Hence we have to use CK51N.
    Now the problem is for any change in any line item of a sales order is changing the costing status from "VO" to "KA" for all line items of the given sales order in table KEKO.
    This is causing measure problem as production people are facing problem while making any change in production order as already there is a check put in CO02 that if cost estimate does not exist for underlying sales order, then change in production order should not be allowed.
    Similarly production order creation (converting planned order to production order) is getting held up.
    Costing user has to repeated run CK51N for all line items of a single sales order if there is any change in any single line item of the sales order.
    Hence pl. help and suggest as to what is to be done now.
    Regards
    Ratna

  • Is there a way go get the item number of the current item?

    In an item with multiple instances: Is there a way to get the item number of the current item? If for instance, I am on the 3rd item, is there some kind of “GET CURRENT RECORD NUMBER” built-in that would return a ‘3' to the program?
    Thanks
    Edited by: WayneFMcKinstry on Apr 9, 2010 10:50 AM

    If i am getting you correctly that in tabular item you want to know the current record or current item you can try this...
    For current record
    :SYSTEM.CURSOR_RECORD;
    or
    :SYSTEM.CURRENT_RECORD;for current item
    :SYSTEM.CURSOR_ITEM;-Ammad

  • Visual attribute for current item

    How can i set the visual attribute of the current item in multi block form so that when user navigate through item in a form its background colour is changed and user can easily trace where the cursor is ?

    1- I have three list box on the form as well so whether post-text-item works over therei have no issues with this and it is working fine in my forms list box
    2- and i have 3 datablock among which 2nd and thid datablock is multirecord datablock where i set current record visual attribute so what is the behaviour @ run time either current record Visual attribute override current item VA or it works fine
    it is working perfectly in multi record also..you need to remember in post text trigger use the same visual attribute used for current record visual attribute

  • Editing a current item of an arrayCollection

    Seemed pretty intuitive but I guess I've not done it before in this way. I have a collection of divisions (sports divisions in a league) in an arrayCollection. To edit info for any division, I use a dropdown list that has a dataProvider of the array collection using the name field as the label field. That works fine the first time but when I drop down the list for the second time, it actually updates the current division with the new division info that's being instantiated.
    That sounds difficult to visualize.
    I have a form called DivisionForm with fields populated by [Bindable] model.currentDivision
    I have a manager that acts as the model which injects the values for divisions and currentDivision into the form.
    When I change the dropdown item, it dispatches an event to the manager which says, in short, currentDivision = divisions.getItemAt[dropDown.selectedItemIndex]
    So that's not really how it works but conceptually that's what's happening. But when I try to change out the currentDivision, it actually updates by reference the old item.
    So, let's say I  start with an arraycollection of
    softball
    baseball
    tball
    and the currentDivision is softball in the form. When I dispatch the event, the manager gets the message fine and the function is (simplified)
    public function changeCurrentDivision(e:DivisionEvent):void {
                var division:Division = e.division;
               currentDivision = e.division
    so now I have
    baseball
    baseball
    tball
    I understand the concept of both pointing to the same arrayCollection but I can not figure out how to simply say set the form elements with the currentDivsion being baseball, don't update the existing currentItem reference in the arrayCollection. I've tried making currentDivision a deep copy of the original object within the arrayCollection but no go. What simple principle am I missing here? The only ways I've been successful are way too verbose and obviously stupid so I'm looking for the right way ;-)

    My solution doesn't feel ideal but maybe it will elicit suggestions regarding a better way to handle it. Essentially, I have an array collection of custom objects related to a sports league. I bind one of those, say division[2] to a construct called currentDivision and that division objects to fields in a form and had bindings to specific properties like {currentDivision.name} . I could update the current item but then when I would change the dropDownList to select another division, and through a manager had the value for currentDivision bind to, let's say, division[4] as the new currentDivision, division[2] would be populated by division[4]. Obviously, the reference was a pointer that was telling flex to change currentDivision [2] to the values for division[4] rather than start fresh with a new object. My hunch is there's a way to properly edit that object using the dp.source but I haven't hit on the right search terms yet for my friend Google. So instead I decided to make a copy of the division[2] to populate the editing form so that it was divorced from the actualy dataCollection. To do that I had to make a deep copy of the division object, which involved a couple of things. I created a little class because I knew I was going to be doing this a lot that was a copier.
        public class DeepCopy {
            import mx.utils.ObjectUtil;
            public function DeepCopy() {
            public static function copyLO(item:Object):Object {
                var myCopy:Object=ObjectUtil.copy(item);
                return myCopy;
    but this copies all the properties as generic objects so I also had to modify my division object with some metadata. So the division class looked something like:
    package com.cactusware.model {
        import mx.utils.UIDUtil;
        import mx.collections.ArrayCollection;
        [Bindable]
        [RemoteClass(alias="com.cactusware.model.Division")]
        public class Division {
            private var _Guid:String;
            private var _name:String;
            private var _shortCode:String;
            private var _longCode:String;
            private var _notes:String;
            private var _customCodes:ArrayCollection;
            public function Division() {
                Guid = UIDUtil.createUID();
            public function get Guid():String {
                return _Guid;
    ..... and so forth.
    Now in my app I could make a copy that was pretty divorced from the actual dataprovider.
    var newDivision:Division = DeepCopy.copyLO(currentDivision) as Division;
    At least those are the principles summarized.
    Now hopefully one of the gurus will tell us how to do this without going through all the gyrations, assuming they understand the problem we're having.
    John

  • Multiple Quotation lines against one PR/PRF item

    Hi,
    I want to address projects related senario in which during PR creation only high level details of a product is known e.g. Substation is to be procured. So RFQ is also floated for Substation (only one line item in PR/RFQ). Now when vendor sends the quotation it contains many line items because he will enter all details line transformers, coolers in the quotation.So in quotation maintenance we should add all the lines against only one RFQ item.Also purchase order also should contain all those line items and goods receipt should be possible for all single line items separately. Total cost should go in main line item i.e. Substation.
    Please help me addressing this senario
    Regards

    Hello,
    Actually we are picking based on full pallets/partial pallet (LE quantities) and if multiple partial picks for the same material in same outbound delivery then system proposes partial pallets, which is just wastage of time to consolidating again rather 'sum it up' total quantity of same material and pick the maximum full pallets as it going to same customer...
    Whole thing triggered up, when multiple back orders with partial quantities and putting together in the delivery (as and when the material is available...) and then TO creation/picking...
    regards,
    JPS

  • Update Column value after current item is Approved and then publish major version using Sharepoint 2013 designer workflow

    Hi,
    We have a requirement to update a column value once the item has been approved.
    Following settings have been made in the publishing articles list:
    Require content approval for submitted items : yes
    Create major and minor (draft) versions
    Who should see draft items in this document library? :Only users who can edit items
    Require documents to be checked out before they can be edited? : yes
    I have createdatu a Sharepoint 2013 workflow to check if Approval sts of current item = 0 i.e. Approved , then check out and update the item and finally checkin the item. Everything works fine till this point except that the minor version of the item is
    checked in. Due to this the updated columns are not published to others.
    Also, I created a Sharepoint 2010 workflow to SET CONTENT APPROVAL = APPROVED and started this workflow from my list workflow above, but the item does not get checked-in and always shows "In Progress" status with comment "The item is currently
    locked for editing. Waiting for item to be checked in or for the lock to be released.".
    Please let me know where I am missing out so that once the item is approved, column value gets updated and current item is still in Approved status.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to update Column value after current item is Approved and then publish major version using Sharepoint 2013 designer workflow.
    You will get into this kind of Catch-22 situation trying to set the Content Approval Status in SharePoint Designer workflow:
    - You must check out the document before you can change the Content Approval Status
             - You can't change the Content Approval Status once the document in checked out
    Since you set the Require documents to be checked out before they can be edited=Yes, you will need to check out the document when run the workflow on the item. But you cannot approve a document when it is checked
    out. So the logic in workflow conflicts.
    As a workaround, you can use the Start Another Workflow action to start the normal Approval workflow on the document.  The built-in Approval workflow can work with a document that’s not checked out.
    The designer approval workflow also can work with a document that’s not checked out.
    You can create two workflow using SharePoint Designer 2013.
    First, create a SharePoint 2010 platform workflow.
    Then, create a SharePoint 2013 platform workflow.
    Then when the SharePoint 2013 platform workflow start, it will start the SharePoint 2010 platform workflow to set content approval status, then the SharePoint 2013 platform workflow will update current item value.
    More information:
    SharePoint Designer Workflow Content Approval Issue
    SharePoint 2010 Approval Workflow with Content Approval
    Best Regards,
    Linda Li
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Changing the color of the current item in a link bar

    It seems that the currrent item and the disabled color are
    the same. How can I have the current item stand out in a link bar?
    I see styles for Selected but not for the current item.
    thanks
    bruce

    I tried with keylistener but it is not working.What is not working, the KeyListener or the coloring of cells? Don't make us guess.
    If you need further help then you need to create a [Short, Self Contained, Compilable and Executable, Example Program (SSCCE)|http://homepage1.nifty.com/algafield/sscce.html], that demonstrates the incorrect behaviour.
    Don't forget to use the [Code Formatting Tags|http://forum.java.sun.com/help.jspa?sec=formatting], so the posted code retains its original formatting.

Maybe you are looking for