Sign documents without entering a signature password?

On the PC version of Acrobat you can sign documents very easily without entering in a password every time you want to sign a document.  On the mac version it appears that you have to enter a pwd every single time you sign a document... this is very frustrating when signing 20-30 docs at a time.  Is there a way to disable the pwd requirement in Acrobat X for Mac?

Hi sojourner166,
For the sake of discussion lets limit how a digital ID is access to either directly from a file or through the operating system (OS). Both the file & the OS methods allow the user to access the private key (that's the part that is password protected) without having to enter the password each time.
On Windows the OS loads the digital ID into the Windows Certificate Store an on the Mac OS it uses Keychain Access. On Windows when you import a digital ID, if you don't select High Assurance (which is off by default) the OS assumes that if you could log in using your password that's good enough and will allow access to the private key without prompting you for the password. On the Mac, Keychain Access has UI which lets you control whether you need to confirm the password or not.
When you are signing with a digital ID in either of the OS based systems Acrobat say to the OS "give me access to the private key so I can do a signature operation". The OS then checks the setting and either grants access without further ado, or, it says to Acrobat "before I'll give you access to the private key you've got to tell me the password". Acrobat in turn puts up a dialog asking the user for the password. You type it in, hit the Sign button and Acrobat says to the OS, "okay here you go, now can I get access to the private key so I can finish this signing operation?". The OS checks the password that Acrobat sent along and if it's correct grants access to the private key, and if it's not correct returns an error code, which causes the signing operation to abort.
If the digital ID is residing in a file then the OS sits on the sideline and Acrobat handles the password work itself. If you are using a digital ID that resides in a file you can set the password timeout option through the Acrobat UI. In the Security Setting dialog expand Digital IDs in the tree view and then select Digital ID Files. From there you can click on the Password Timeout button and adjust how often you want to be prompted for a password to access the private key.
Here's a picture of what you are looking for:
If you are using a digital ID listed under Keychain Digital IDs let me know and I'll work up those steps for you.
Hope this helps,
Steve

Similar Messages

  • Sign Document Dialog for handwritten signature

    Hi,
    We are a company that provides security solutions for the IT market.
    One of our products performs signature recognition.
    At first we would like to call our interactive dll.
    The dll outputs a BMP file with a changing name (for each signature)
    and can require that the BMP will be generated providing that the
    signature is authenticated. We need to automatically attach the
    signature to a SigField/SigAnnot. When the user clicks a signature
    field we need to call our DLL and if the BMP is generated then we
    have to load it to the SigField. To the best of my knowledge this a
    difficult task that involves the implementation of DSNewSigDataProc
    or DSNewSigDataWithParamsProc, DSCommitSignProc, DSFinishSignProc,
    and DSFreeSigDataProc. We tried to use PubSec instead of DigSig as
    recommended without success. The problem with DigSig is that there
    are no code samples available from which we can get a reasonable
    jumpstart and practically learn how to use functions like
    DSNewSigDataWithParamsProc or DSNewSigDataProc.
    There was a very good sample in Adobe Acrobat 5.0 sdk but now it is
    impossible to get the Acrobat 5.0 SDK.
    We tried to understand how to replace the "Sign Document" dialog
    using the Doc
    Please advise.

    Dear "lrosenth",
    We will try the Acrobat Developers program as suggested.
    We already have a RIKLA.
    Thank you very much,
    Eytan, R & D, ANT/ANB.

  • Is there a way to push apps to iPads OTA without entering a ID/password?

    I work for a public school system that has about 1500 iPads. Currently we have one school with about 600 iPads and students are using them in a 1:1 capacity. Each classroom has a cart with a laptop that controls the iPads through Apple Configurator. Each cart has its own apple id.
    We just purchased a Mac Mini Server with the newest server version on it. I set up profile manager and was really excited about the ability to remotely manage restrictions and apps. But then I discover that when trying to use the app that's pushed through PM, you need to enter in the Apple ID and Password from the Apple ID I used to get the push certificate for the server. Does anyone know a workflow that makes it easiest to get Apps pushed through Profile Manager and work on the iPads?
    Are there any MDMs out there that can actually push Apps out without every iPad signing into the Apple ID? I just called Apple and the guy didn't know anything that would help me.

    Read here >  iTunes Store: Changing account information
    A VISA debit card is accepted.
    And here >  iTunes Store: Accepted forms of payment

  • Released document without complete digital signature

    Hi All!
    I'm working with digital signatures in the DMS system and I have set the release indicator so that two signatures are needed to release a DIR. The problem is that the DIR gets the green release status after saving the first signature. I get the feeling that this is a bug in the system but I have tested it in two systems and it works the same way in both systems (one of them is a ECC6.0 EHP5 system and should have all the relevant updates). The whole idea with digital signatures at the release status is in my head that the DIR does not get released before all stakeholders have signed the DIR. Am I wrong or have I done anything wrong in the config?
    Best regards,
    Kristoffer P

    Hi Kristoffer,
    Any specific logic as to why you intend to use two digital signatures to release a DIR?
    Because,in your case,you can fulfill your requirement by using a single digital signature for a DIR.Herein,since there are two bodies involved for releasing a DIR, you may define the 'Signature Sequence' and the 'Release Sequence' in digital signature customization.This will ensure that that document is released/green indicator set only after body A and body B both have digitally signed the DIR in the sequence specified.Does this help?
    Regards,
    Pradeepkumar Haragoldavar

  • Appending new pages to signed documents now makes Acrobat 9 and Reader 9 mark signature as invalid

    Hello!
    I have developed a service that appends additional pages to existing PDF documents. Some of the documents the service works on happen to be signed. As the service appends the pages using incremental updates, the signed contents are left untouched. This makes Acrobat 8 and Reader 8 display the signature state as "valid with subsequent changes" which is ok and no one complains about.
    Now along come Acrobat 9 and Reader 9, and all of a sudden the signature state is "invalid" which my users do complain about. Telling them that inspecting the signature state details they can see that the signed content still is untouched and the actual change is recognized to be some appended pages, doesn't help either as they in turn forward the documents to their customers who don't accept the documents if the Adobe Reader sais the signatures are invalid.
    Does anyone know a way new pages can be added to a signed document without having the new Adobe program versions choke on them?
    Even a hint that involves adding some flag to the original unsigned document or the signature itself would help as the users in question can tweak those processes. Due to the nature of the workflow, though, signing unfortunately must happen before my service can add the new pages.
    Best regards, Mikel.
    By the way, the signatures in question are regular approval signatures, nothing fancy, especially not certifying signatures (which indeed can forbid any changes or at least any changes but some form fill-ins and annotations)...

    Hi Fritz,
    In the interest of full disclosure, I got the answer to the problem from one of my distinguished colleagues, I'm just the messenger in this case.
    The problem is that the form adds some items to the Arzneispezialität / Zusatztext combobox which are there during signing but the form doesn’t remember that it did this on the next form open. 
    Since this field is included in the MDP+ signature and the field has changed in the re-opened version vs. the signed version, the MDP+ signature becomes invalid.
    XFA has a feature that remembers these kinds of things for you but it is turned it OFF. Please open the attached screen shot to see the control in question.
    So, you can either (1) turn this feature ON (Automatically), or (2) write some script to clear the combobox items prior to signing or (3) write some script to repopulate the combobox items on the subsequent open to match the items that were there during signing.
    Steve

  • Accessing KM Documents without Login

    Hi Experts,
        I need to access the KM Documents from the logon page.  When I click the link from the logon page, it should open the KM Document without asking username and password.  How to achieve this, Please help in this regard.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Art Tech.

    U can use anonymous logon
    Anonymous logon allows users to access the portal in anonymous mode, without providing any form of authentication.
    SAP Knowledge Management does not fully support anonymous logon
    SAP Enterprise Portal provides two forms of anonymous logon:
    •Anonymous logon with named anonymous users (default configuration)
    This form of anonymous logon uses ‘named’ anonymous users, which are users that exist either in the user data store or as service users. These users are automatically assigned to the group Anonymous Users. You can assign roles containing anonymous content to the users individually or to the group Anonymous Users.
    •Simple anonymous logon
    With this form of anonymous logon there is no physical user in the data store, so, for example, you cannot assign a role containing anonymous content to an anonymous user. As there is no user, a logon ticket is not issued.
    If you use simple anonymous logon, there is no current user. This means that personalization functions such as modifying the user’s profile are not available.
    For anonymous logon the following properties in sapum.properties are relevant:
    ume.logon.anonymous_user.mode : 1 = Anonymous logon with named anonymous users is used.
    0 = Simple anonymous logon is used (Default value).
    ume.login.guest_user.uniqueids :Comma-separated list of user IDs.
    The default value is anonymous. (Only required if ume.logon.
    anonymous_user.mode=1.
    Defines which users are the
    named anonymous users.
    These users automatically
    belong to the default group
    Anonymous Users.
    The administrator has to
    create these anonymous
    users in the user data store)
    ume.login.guest_user.defaultid(Optional) :<no_value> = The first user in the list for ume.login.guest_user.uniqueids
    is used. <User ID>
    Steps to Enable Simple Anonymous Logon:
    1.Start the Config Tool, for example, D:\usr\sap\J2E\JC01\j2ee\configtool\configtool.bat.
    2.Choose Yes to confirm the Connection Settings dialog.
    3.Go to cluster-data &#61664; Global server configuration &#61664; services &#61664; com.sap.security.core.ume.service
    4.Modify the Key ume.login.anonymous_user.mode to 0.
    5.Choose Set and Save buttons.
    6.Exit Config Tool.
    7.Restart the AS for Java.
    8.Access the portal in anonymous mode by entering the following URL, for example: http://pald00151769a:50100/irj/portal/anonymous
    Note: You might not see portal content correctly until finishing the following section
    Assign anonymous content to anonymous users :
    1.Open an iView in the iView Editor (for example, Content Administration &#61664; Portal Content &#61664; Best Practices &#61664; News)
    2.Choose Advanced in the Property Category drop list menu.
    3.Choose anonymous in the Authentication Scheme.
    4.Repeat steps 1-3 for all objects released to the anonymous user.
    Hope this helps U
    Regards
    Krishna.

  • Missing namespace on a signed document

    Hi,
    I'm signing a document which has this original format:
    <LceEnvioLibros xmlns="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce LceEnvioLibros_v10.xsd" version="1.0">
      <DocumentoEnvioLibros ID="ENVIO_DIARIO">
      </DocumentoEnvioLibros>
      <LCE>
        <LceDiario xmlns="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce LceDiario_v10.xsd" version="1.0">
          <LceDiarioRes xmlns="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sii.cl/SiiLce LceDiarioRes_v10.xsd" version="1.0">
            <DocumentoDiarioRes ID="DIARIO_RES_2006_01">
            </DocumentoDiarioRes>
          </LceDiarioRe>
        </LceDiario>
      </LCE>
    </LceEnvioLibros>When I sign it the namespaces (xmlns, xmlns:ds and xml:xsi ) on the LceDiario and LceDiarioRes elements disappear. I know they are somewhat redundant but is there something I can do about that?
    Cheers,
    Mauricio

    While I sympathize Mauricio, I still do not agree that one should give in so easily to this kind of stupidity. It is the tyranny of petty bureaucrats that makes the world such a messy place.
    Point them to the W3C spec on Canonicalization (http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-c14n11-20080502/#SuperfluousNSDecl) which unequivocally states that "*Superfluous namespace declarations are removed from each element*". So what do they gain by putting in redundant namespace declarations when every conformant parser/canonicalizer is going to strip it out anyway? Technology is meant to make our lives easier and more productive - not the other way around.
    That said, you can put back the redundant namespace declarations into the elements (through an XSL Transformation) AFTER the signature is affixed to the document, send it to them and the signature will still be verified correctly. This "magic" works because from XMLSignature's point-of-view, you haven't modified the document at all - the modified instance is identical to the canonical version of the signed document and thus, the signature continues to validate.
    So, the end result is, in order to satisfy some bureaucrat's desire for seeing XML in a specific way, lots of time, money, electricity and disk-space is going to be wasted for something that doesn't add any value (you should let your business executives know that).
    Arshad Noor
    StrongAuth, Inc.

  • Modifying a Signed Document via its Metadata

    This is a good one for all of you out there. We all know that if you make a modification to any Office document that has been digitally signed, you end up removing all signatures in it because the file has been altered. However, we have a scenario, where
    content in our Word documents are imported out of a SharePoint list. For exemple, we have a form that will initiate a new Staffing request with our HR department. The information related to the linguistic profile of the position to staff is extracted out of
    another SharePoint list.
    If someone was to sign the document, and then go and alter the linguistic profile value in the associated list, the new value would show up in the signed document, preserving the digital signature. This gives the impression to our end-users that people are
    able to alter Office Documents that have been signed, and is making them loose faith in the platform. I am looking for advise or recommendations on how to best approach this issue to ensure people cannot altered external data that is being used by signed documents,
    or for a way to have the digital signature removed if the data is ever modified.
    Nikolas Charlebois-Laprade Microsoft Certified Professional & Software Engineer http://nikcharlebois.com

    Is there an Action Wizard to automate this? I have partners that chance the file name,  what I would like to have happen is the orginal file name becomes the title, so if the file name gets changed the title remains the same.

  • Password protecting digitally signed documents in Adobe Acrobat X Pro

    I am looking for the combination of steps to get my digitally signed documents to be password protected for secure distribution. My documents contain new "user password" information and a number of "areas" which require digital signatures to be added.
    Any input as to how one would construct a document with :
    one to three --> digitally signed signatures fields in one document
    Password "opening" protection for the document containing the fields; both signatures and sensitive data fields
    suggestions on how to make the document open to accepting more signatures without it demanding the creation of a newly saved document after being digitally signed by one signature
    I have worked at this a couple of different ways but am having problems finding the right combination/sequence of steps to make it all come together.
    Please assist.....
    Thanks....

    ......meaning.......
    I can't do locking of the printing or editing of the sheet after i have encrypted and signed it.  Trying to do so, wipes out out signatures. Yes, it is a great fullproof to have people be unable to change something someone has signed but if there is an ammendment, can't the creator reserve that right and in an automated sense notify the signers of the rights of the author ?
    Maybe I am looking for too much but, it would be great to know if that is the reality of the whole event.
    Thanks,
    Robert

  • Invalid password error when signing document

    I am unable to sign documents due to "invalid password" error even though I am using the password entered when account activated.

    Which kind of password: encrypted PDF or password to connect to acrobat.com? What kind of signature: EchoSign, ink, stamp, digital? Which version of Acrobat/Reader? Which OS?

  • Digital Signatures and editing signed documents

    Situation - A medical office wants to digitally sign a document after it has been edited (to make it a legal order) but have the form remain unlocked so it can be edited again.  They want to be able to accomplish this on a single instance of the form without using the server solution just a form designed in LiveCycle with Javascript powering the transactions.  Is this possible?

    You can edit a signed PDF document (assuming you are not using the field collection feature).  This will not "Invalidate" the signature, but it will change the status of the signature.
    I have attached two screen shots to illustrate...  To generate these, I signed a PDF, changed some data and re-validated the signature.
    ValidationStatus.gif shows the status of the actual signature.
    DocStatus.gif shows a "roll-up" status (meaning it checks all signatures on a doc and displays an overview) of the signed document.
    Regards
    Steve

  • I have an itouch that will not let me sign in to my itunes account. The email address that it is associated with is no longer valid. I keep entering the correct password but it says that it is incorrect. I cant get a reset all of my credentials dont work.

    I have an itouch that will not let me sign in to my itunes account. The email address that it is associated with is no longer valid. I keep entering the correct password but it says that it is incorrect. I can’t get a reset all of my credentials don’t work. Now all my apps won’t work. it looks like they load for half a second then disappear. What can I do?

    - Try contacting iTunes for the password problem:
    Apple - Support - iTunes - Contact Us
    - For the other problem you can try a reset. Nothing will be lost
    Reset iPod touch:  Hold down the On/Off button and the Home button at the same time for at
    least ten seconds, until the Apple logo appears.
    - The next standard thing to do is to download/install a new app but you cant 'do that.
    - Instead, try restoring from backup.

  • I can no longer send or receive iMessages on my iphone 5. When I try to sign on to my iCloud account it says that my password is incorrect. i have changed my password four times and it still says i am entering the wrong password.

    I can no longer send or receive iMessages on my iphone 5. When I try to sign on to my iCloud account it says that my password is incorrect. i have changed my password four times and it still says i am entering the wrong password, which i know for a fact i am not.

    yes i've tried both my wifi and my 3g network nothing works. ive been talking to apple the last few days and no one can fix the issue, they just keep telling me they'll call back the next day to try something else. i dont understand how i can facetime but im not getting the option to send or receive imessages when facetime and imessage are used on the same server

  • Sign Document with Signature validated Automatically

    Hi everyone
    I want to sign a PDF document  with a certificate “.pfx”, I have adobe pro extended  and visual studio 2008 for do that and I’m using visual c sharp to develop my application until here everything it’s  ok the problem is after to sign the document when I open the document  adobe can’t verify the signature and timestamp,  I need to validate the signature manually  and I don’t need that, I need the validate the signature and timestamp automatically because I need to distributed a lot pdf sign documents to my customers and I can’t  provide exclusive solutions for each one of them for validate the segnatures, I hope you can help me with this issue.
    My Best Regards

    What do you mean by "can't verify"?  That the validity is unknown?  Does it say why? 
    Most likely this is due to an unknown root certificate for the .pfx.  What is the root/CA for the .pfx?

  • How to create a signature in Yosemite for signing documents?

    How do I create signatures in Yosemite for signing documents?
    It used to be in Preview but can't find it now in Yosemite.
    Thanks.

    It can be accessed through Preview in Yosemite also. You can go to Tools -> Annotate -> Signature -> Manage Signature, to create new signature or edit the existing one.
    Thanks,
    Sanjeev

Maybe you are looking for

  • Nokia 770: Can't Surf The Net In Hotels

    When trying to connect my Nokia 770 Internet Tablet while in hotels, I find that my success is hit and miss. But I can use a laptop and connect. The difference is the browser on the laptop defaults to a web page from the ISP where I have to agree to

  • "hard drive not exist" depending on installed HD (works in one, not in the other)

    This is a problem I've never had before... This is not my laptop, so I don't know the previous state. I had to replace the system board on a g60-600 because it would not power on. Ordered a new one, swapped it out, and now it turns on. Yay! However,

  • Search results showing the source before the document title

    Hello, I have created a BI Catalog in Sharepoint 2010, which consists mainly of libraries with rdl items and I have also set a content source in Search Service to search into these libraries. Search results were fine, but after the last crawl I have

  • In-process inspection in repetitive mfg-  Inspection type - 13

    Hi there,              Can any one please tell me what is the differrence between the inspection type -03 & 13. As per my understanding the only diff is that 03 is used in discrete mfg & 13 in repetitive mfg... what is the other differrence ........?

  • Run Process in TTY session

    I'm working on a linux machine, and have a process that I want to launch from within a java program (please, no sermons about platform dependence and choosing java as a technology. I have my reasons). This process typically writes a few questions out