SIT and Matlab

I am trying to generate de .dll of the sinewave model example that appears in http://www.ni.com/white-paper/11654/en. The fact is when i configure the settings of the real time workshop and i push the build button, an error window appears saying that there is not compiler installed. I have installed VS2010 express and with the mex -setup i have well localizated in the the matlab root. My versions of Labview and SIT are from 2012 and the matlab version is 2011a.I am using windows XP.
Thanks for your help.

natasftw wrote:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/02F5FA55FC28BDE1862578A30071F975
While that's for 2011, I doubt they decided to remove 64-bit compatibility as they went forward seeing as 64-bit became more of a demand rather than less. In that document, "Note The LabVIEW Simulation Interface Toolkit does not support 64-bit versions of the MATLAB application software."
As far as compatiblitly for 32-bit, I'd take a look at: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D174674A91E5536286257428005C2426
OP's question was regarding SIT support on 64-bit version of LabVIEW and 64-bit version of MATLAB/Simulink software itself, not the operating system.
Document in your second link is on a completely different topic of API inter-compatibility of LabVIEW & MATLAB/Simulink/RTW (well, mostly Simulink & RTW). Here's the relevant link for 32-bit compatibility: http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/049295038FF0EE2A86257A06006B2DAD there is no 64-bit SIT.
Another underlying issues is that Pharlap doesn't have a 64-bit version. Simulations are eventually better run on RTOS (PXI embedded controllers) for a deterministic performance rather than PC operating systems.
-BTC
New Controls & Indicators made using vector graphics & animations? Click below for Pebbles UI

Similar Messages

Hi Guys, I am using the full width video widget on a site. The widget was working perfectly however I have just added additional content to the site and re-uploaded and now the video is not working! Please help I have tried everything and am freaking out

Hi Guys,
I am using the full width video widget on a site. The widget was working perfectly however I have just added additional content to the site and re-uploaded and now the video is not working! Please help I have tried everything and am freaking out as this web-site has been payed for by my client.
Alex

Many thanks.
With those symptoms, I'd try the following document:
Apple software on Windows: May see performance issues and blank iTunes Store
(If there's a SpeedBit LSP showing up in Autoruns, it's usually best to just uninstall your SpeedBit Video Accelerator.)

What's the difference between a web site and a web application?

I'm stumped trying to come up to a difference between a web site and a web application for myself. As I see it, a web site points to a specific page and a web application is more of some sort of 'portal' to content and information.
But where I'm stuck is that a web application is still viewed through a browser (is it not?) and a web site can still view content dynamically, making the line between web site and application prety gray.
For instance, does a web site using ASP.NET or AJAX (I assume ASP.NET is AJAX's proprietary sibling, if not, ignore ASP.NET AND concentrate on the AJAX), becomes a web application because it can retrieve data dynamically and asynchronously or would a website
using PHP and a CMS be more of a web application because it forms the pages on request, based on the request of the client and its content in its databse?
Or maybe I'm totally wrong here - what differenciates between a web application and a website?
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68630566--C-mon-lets-Watch-The-Other-Woman-2014-full-movie-online-free
https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68643806--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/68115098--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
This is totally personal and subjective, but I'd say that a website is defined by its content, while a webapplication is
defined by its interaction with the user. That is, a website can plausibly consist of a static content repository that's dealt out to all visitors, while a web application depends on interaction and requires programmatic user input and data processing.
For example, a news site would be a "website", but a spreadsheet or a collaborative calendar would be web "applications". The news site shows essentially the same information to all visitors, while the calendar processes individual data.
Practically, most websites with quickly changing content will also rely on a sophisticated programmatic (and/or database) backend, but at least in principle they're only defined by their output. The web application on the other hand is essentially a program that
runs remotely, and it depends fundamentally on a processing and a data storage backend.
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68125597--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/67541393--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68168787--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68161538--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
There is no real "difference". Web site is a more anachronistic term that exists from the early days of
the internet where the notion of a dynamic application that can respond to user input was much more limited and much less common. Commercial websites started out largely as interactive brochures (with the notable exception of hotel/airline reservation sites).
Over time their functionality (and the supporting technologies) became more and more responsive and the line between an application that you install on your computer and one that exists in the cloud became more and more blurred.
If you're just looking to express yourself clearly when speaking about what you're building, I would continue to describe something that is an interactive brochure or business card as a "web site" and something that actually *does something that feels
more like an application as a web app.
The most basic distinction would be if a website has a supporting database that stores user data and modifies what the user sees based on some user specified criteria, then it's probably an app of some sort (although I would be reluctant to describe Amazon.com
as a web app, even though it has a lot of very user-specific functionality). If, on the other hand, it is mostly static .html files that link to one another, I would call that a web site.
Most often, these days, a web app will have a large portion of its functionality written in something that runs on the client (doing much of the processing in either javascript or actionscript, depending on how its implemented) and reaches back through some
http process to the server for supporting data. The user doesn't move from page to page as much and experiences whatever they're going to experience on a single "page" that creates the app experience for them.

...can i make as many iweb websites as i want? ...and as many blogs as i want? ...i have never made one before....
....although, i do have my own small business and i do have a website that i paid a guy to make and also host....(which is a waste of $$$$ in my opinion as i think i can do a better job making one myself through iweb) ....
...anyways, i know it is splitting hairs but what exactly is the diff b/w a blog and a website ....i am under the impression that a blog is just a personal newsletter sort of thing,...?

HT4098 How do I unsubscribe from subscription VIP in the game StarMaker? every week, I removed 66 rubles, while I'm there not even sit, and how do I unsubscribe don't know, please help

How do I unsubscribe from subscription VIP in the game StarMaker? every week, I removed 66 rubles, while I'm there not even sit, and how do I unsubscribe don't know, please help

Contact the maker of the app. Apple has nothing to do with subscriptions to third party apps.

Exchange Server 2010 Mailflow between Internet Facing-Site and No Internet Facing-Site

Hi all,
My environment there are two sites, Internet Facing-Site and No Internet Facing-Site.
The mail flow between them, it isn't working. The messages stuck in the queue.
Default Receive Connector No internet facing-site is configured, bellow:
Defaul....
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Exchange Server Authentication.
- Integrated windows....
Configuration the Internet Facing-Site, bellow:
From intenet
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Integrated windows....
And i configured a new receive connector on the Internet Facing-Site, follow bellow:
Sites
- Transport layer....
-Basic Authentication...
- Exchange Server Authentication.
- Integrated windows....
But, the messages yet stay stuck in the queue.
Queue error:
451 4.4.0 Primary target IP address responded with: “421 4.2.1 Unable to connect.” Attempted failover to alternate host, but that did not succeed. Either there are no alternate hosts, or delivery failed to all alternate hosts.
I'm needing help, pls.

Please check SMTP traffic filtering/scanning enabled on the router/firewall. You can telnet even if the SMTP
traffic filtering/scanning enabled on the router/firewall. But emails will not pass through if the configuration is incorrect.
May be speed between sites causing this issue (not sure). Anyway please try changing the Tarpitinterval as a test.
To see the current setting "Get-ReceiveConnector | Select name,tarpitinterval "To set new value "Set-ReceiveConnector “<Connector-Name>”
–TarPitInterval:00:00:010"
Try restarting "MSexchange-Transport-sevice" on both servers as well
Can you send email one-way or
both ways not working?
MAS

Move Internet facing site and remove Exchange site

Background:
I am running Exchange 2010 in native mode
I have multiple AD sites connected via WAN
I have two sites each with an Exchange CAS, HT, Mailbox server and internet connections
I have one Edge server in the DMZ at the internet facing site A
All mail currently flows in/out through site A via connectors
OWA is currently hosted on the CAS/HT server at site A
I have installed a new Edge server in the DMZ of site B and cloned the configuration.
I am planning the move of the internet facing site to the new site where the other Exchange CAS/HT server resides.
Once the mail flow is occurring correctly in/out site B, I need to move all mailboxes to site B and shut down the Exchange server at site A.
Questions:
When I create the Edge Subscription at the new site, it offers to create a new send connector. The CAS/HT server at site B already has a send connector to site A. Will the new send connector cause mail flow problems if it is pointing to
the new Edge server that is not yet updated on public DNS? I am trying to do this in stages and I am not ready to change mail flow to site B internet.
What needs to happen to move OWA to the Exchange server at site B?
Once site B is handling OWA, all mail flow, and all mailboxes have been moved to that site, can I simply shut down the site A Exchange server?
Thanks for any input on how best to plan this move. If there is any documentation for this specific scenario, I work well from instructions but have not seen anything on the internet.

1. Sending can happen from both sites, regardless of where your MX records point. In fact, you don't need an MX record to send email - just to receive. So the new send connector in Site B won't cause issues with mail flow - messages will
go out B and come in A until you rehome your MX record.
2. In order to move OWA to Site B, your external records for your OWA site need to point to the external IP address that will connect to the Site B CAS (and hopefully, you have it behind a firewall of some sort).
3. Not quite - you need to move your OAB generation to the new site, and make sure that all CAS virtual directories in the new site are configured to handle the connections that currently go to Site A. See the following for what you need to do
to decommission your Site A Exchange servers - but where it says "Exchange 2013", think "Site A Exchange servers":
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee332361(v=exchg.141).aspx

Issue with Internet facing site and Intranet sites

Hello All,
I have migrated the SP2013 environment using database attach method for our intranet site. We also working on the
SP2013 Internet facing site using the same content database as Internet site.
When I extended the web application for Internet facing site, zone to
Internet and these are the URLs: The Intranet website URL is
https://intranet.contoso.com/SitePages/home.aspx (Root Site) and
SP2013 Internet facing site http://contoso.com (not a root site and publishing site template)
However, I found on the http://contoso.com users can still access the
http://contoso.com/SitePages/home with same content as Intranet.
After done some Google search, bloggers mentioned to have move https://intranet.contoso.com/SitePages/home.aspx to another site collection so that Internet facing site can exist root site.
Can 2 we have to two root sites in same web application? I need the content database to be same so that managers can check
Internet facing site and after signing into SP2013, redirects to
Internet site.
Which is the best option to achieve this with same content database.
Please advice.
Regards,
Aroh
Aroh Shukla

Business Requirement:
Content Managers want to control internal Internet site (https://intranet.contoso.com) (with default zone, port 443, Root site) and also want to have SP2013 Internet site (with Internet zone
http://www.contoso.com (not a root site and publishing site template)), Anonymous access at Web Application level. I configured the site architecture
to have intranet zone as default zone and extended Web Application for Internet facing site with Anonymous site. This the current site architecture
Because content managers do not want to duplicate public site (Internet facing site) with will be shared with some lists that are stored in intranet site.
For e.g. a sub site named “News and Events” will be shared with Public site as well as Internet users. Therefore, if a manger wants to update a list in the public site, it should reflect in intranet site as well. Thus, managers
don’t want to have separate database but same content database.
Problem:
I have extended web application to have different Internet zone, the site URL looks this: http://www.contoso.com/sites/public with publishing template and Anonymous access. Managers want to have public site URL to be just
http://www.contoso.com and not   http://www.contoso.com/SitePages/Home.aspx. As I am using path based site collection for extending site collection, I am
getting this URL http://www.contoso.com/SitePages/Home.aspx
We also tried host named site collection, but it does not provide anonymous access and keep on asking for user credentials.
Q1: We want to have Intranet and Public site with same content database as per business requirements, Shall I following link       http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/81172/moving-content-db-for-a-site-collection-to-another-db-server?
Q2: Because I am constrained that I don’t want to have separate web application, (I know, its not regular requirement), how could achieve this requirements?
Q3: Do have to completely re-design web site architecture, with
www.contoso.com as main web application, then copy Intranet site collection and move this to
www.contoso.com/intranet using
Move-SPSite command
Any kind of pointer and help will be highly appreciated as I am struggling for 2 weeks to solve this.
Regards,
Aroh
Aroh Shukla

I downloaded something and now when I click on safari yahoo comes up instead of top sites and I really want top sites back it's easier and google as the search engine on the top bar helped a lot too!! Please answer quick need immediate HELP!!

I Downloaded something onto my computer and now when I click onto safari yahoo pops up instead of top sites I know certain changes come along with downloading but if there is a way back to top sites and google as my search engine I need it!! I'm not one for change and I love the whole original display that the macs have to offer when you first get your mac so thats why I really want top sites back also it was great when your in and rush and so much easier!! Please HELP immediately this is urgent!!

Identify and remove adware
http://www.thesafemac.com/arg/
or use Adware Removal Tool.
http://www.thesafemac.com/art/

Can't download plug in for windows media player. Have used download site and it says it worked, but plug in is not showing up on my list of plug ins.

I tried to hear a conference call on a website. Got a message, needed windows media plug in. Checked my plug ins, no windows media. Read tutorial on firefox support. Clicked on download. Got a window that asked for repair or change. Tried repair, then change. Need better directions on how to finish download. Got message download successful, but after closing firefox and reopening, still no plug in for windows media in list of plug ins. Went to site and could not hear conference.
Read support forum. Message about using about:config. Tried this, typed in about: config in start menu, but didn't see anything that looked like I could change to true like message said.
solved by opening internet explorer and going to website and listening to conference call on windows media player. There was a message saying click here if you want to enable media player. Did so, heard conference.
Tried using chrome. Got to hear conference yesterday. Today, there was same message about needing plug in when I tried to follow instructions to get plug in, it was as confusing and useless as firefox. The bottom line is I tried to do everything set forth in firefox's forum suggestions and can't get the windown media plug in to show up in my list of plug ins and can't hear conference calls on firefox.
Chrome did say they were working on getting plug in available at chrome store.
I agree with comments that I was able to go to web sites and hear calls before firefox made an update that removed my windows media plug in. The simple download fix, presumeably from windows, does not work, apparently because firefox can't find the fix. That is not the user's fault, and it looks like windows tried to provide a fix, and firefox won't recognize it.
Bottom line, it is easier to use another browser, than try and get the windows media player plug in installed on firefox. What good is a browser, if you can't hear a call on the website that the browser takes you to? Please make it easy to install the windows media plug in on firefox. Thank you..

Firefox can find plugins in several locations, but Firefox 21 changed the location of the "shared" plugin folder so older installers like the Microsoft Windows Media Plugin no longer drop the DLL file in the correct location.
There apparently are two ways to address this:
(1) Change a Firefox preference so that Firefox checks the old location. Here's how:
(i) In a new tab, type or paste '''about:config''' in the address bar and press Enter. Click the button promising to be careful.
(ii) In the filter box, type or paste '''plugins''' and pause while the list is filtered
(iii) Double-click '''plugins.load_appdir_plugins''' to switch its value from false to true.
This will take effect after you restart Firefox.
(2) Copy the plugins folder to the new location. Here's how on Win 7 64-bit:
Open a Windows Explorer window to:
C:\Program Files (x86)\Mozilla Firefox
Right-click and copy the '''Plugins''' folder
Double-click the '''browser''' folder to open it
Right-click and paste
Right-click the new copy of '''Plugins''' and rename it to '''plugins'''
After restarting Firefox, the plugins in that folder should now be available.
''Edit: I suggest just doing #1.''

Routing issue between two satellites sites and one central hub

Hi,
I have 3 Ad sites with one exchange 2010 hub,cas,mailbox server on each sites.
One of this site (site A) is central Hub and the two other sites ( B and C) are two satellites of site A.
The is no connectivity between site B and C, only connectivity between A and B, and A and C.
When I send a mail from Site B to Site C, Exchange try to deliver the mail directly to site C and don't pass to site A to deliver to site C, some mail stay in queue in site B, and the the queue is in retry.
I flag the site A as HUB.
Site toplogy is correct and the cost too.
Can someone help me??
Thanks

what are your AD costs between A, B and C?
In Exchange 2010, each message recipient is always associated with only one Active Directory site, and there is only one least cost routing
from the source Active Directory site to the destination Active Directory site
If the least-cost routing path to the primary site contains any hub sites, the message must be
routed through the hub sites

Vpn site to site and remote access , access lists

Hi all, we run remote access and site to site vpn on my asa, my question is Can I create an access list for the site to site tunnel, but still leave the remote access vpn to bypass the access list via the sysopt command, or if I turn this off will it affect both site to site and remote access vpn ?

If you turn off sysopt conn permit-vpn it will apply to both your site to site and remote access vpn...all ipsec traffic. You would have to use a vpn-filter for the site to site tunnel if you wanted to leave the sysopt in there.

I am using my Ipad on a remote craftshow site and am having problems with battery lasting 8 hrs. Can I use a 12v rv battery to recharge it or atleast maintain the charg over longer periods of time? I have a dc adapter. thanks

I am using my Ipad on a remote craftshow site and am having problems with battery lasting 8 hrs. Can I use a 12v rv battery to recharge it or at least maintain the charge over longer periods of time? I have a dc adapter. thanks

You should be able to use the battery if you get a car type charger which recharges mobile devices.
The full size iPads use a 10-12W charger, whereas the mini uses a 5W charger. Many car chargers only supply 5W. But at 5W, the car charger should give you some extra time on your iPad. It would be best to use a 10-12W car charger.
 Cheers, Tom

I am getting messages that I can't download and read .pdf files since I have the wrong Adobe reader. I know about their security disasters of course, but I downloaded the latest version of Adobe Reader from the Adobe web site and I have other ,pdf file re

I am getting messages that I can't download and read .pdf files since I have the wrong Adobe reader. I know about their security disasters of course, but I downloaded the latest version of Adobe Reader from the Adobe web site and I have other ,pdf file readers as well, and for some reason they won't work either. I have 5 computers running top end processors and RAM. By this I mean I have one, this one which I am using that has an AMD Phenom Black 3.2 Quad-core with 8 GBs of Corsair top DDR2 RAM, my other two AMD have either an Athlon II triple core with 4 GBs of DDR2 Corsair RAM, one with the Phenom X4 965 3.4 GHz Quad-core with 8 GBs of their best DDR2 RAM, and two Intels with the i7 920 Processors using the triple channel 1366 socket processors and one with 8 GBs of low latency DDR3 RAM and the other with 4 GBs of the same RAM. I am getting the message on this one, which has a fresh install of XP Pro X64 operating system, as do the other 4 as well. I have run Avast Business Pro Anti-virus on this one, which I am getting the message on with a single result which I deleted, and also both Spybot Search and Destroy, which came back clean as well as Malwarebytes Antimalware, which got a lot of tracing cookies now removed, and SuperAntiSpware which also found a few cookies also now deleted. Can you tell me what I need to do to get these files to show as .pdf files rather than as a clean blank page. One other issue is that I wish to know how to turn off my downloads so they are saved and Mozilla will give me the option of returning them instead of me losing them all together as it does now. Thanks for your assistance. If there is another Adobe reader I should download and install, could you provide me with the link to it? I appreciate your assistance here
== When I download and try to read a .pdf file and when I am asked to turn off all Firefox files and if I do, I lose them since I need to know how to save them without rebooting my computer.

Brilliant! Problem solved! Thanks so much.

I am having an issue with an IBM site and it was suggested by customer service that I need to install version 3 of Firefox. I cannot find a site to do this.

I need to download a copy of FireFox 3.o to be able to post updates in an IBM repository. The current 4.0 version doesn't allow me to post or open files in this repository.

If you just need it for that one site, I believe a better option than replacing Firefox 4 is to install the portable version of Firefox 3 on your hard drive. You can use the portable version for the IBM site and Firefox 4 for other sites. You can get the portable version from http://portableapps.com/apps/internet/firefox_portable - Firefox 3 is listed in the legacy versions section.
It is best not to use Firefox 3 for all browsing as it is no longer supported with security updates.

The only way I can open a new tab is by right-clicking a bookmarked site and selecting "Open in a New Tab." I can't click on the New Tab + or CTR+T or open via File. WHY?!?

The only way I can open a new tab in Firefox is by right-clicking a bookmarked site and selecting "Open in a New Tab." I can't click on the New Tab + or CTR+T or open via File. WHY don't the other means work?

The Ask Toolbar is causing that in the Firefox 3.6.13+ versions. Uninstall that extension.
There are a couple of places to check for the Ask toolbar:
* Check the Windows Control panel for the Ask Toolbar - http://about.ask.com/apn/toolbar/docs/default/faq/en/ff/index.html#na4
* Also check your list of extensions, you may be able to uninstall it from there - https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Uninstalling+add-ons

SIT and Matlab

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for