Site priority during replenishment

Dear all;
i have a problem when i run replenishment .
scenario: store A000 is assigned to three distribution centers as supplying sites in site master data:
DC 1000(priority 1),DC 2000 (priority 2),DC 3000(priority 3).
I Run replenishment (wrp1) to store A000.Stock is 0 in DC1000.System display error :"0 stock in site 1000" and warning message :No checking rule found for availability check. Supplying site 1000".
Priority doesn't work inspite of there is an available stock in site 2000" and the article is assigned to the three dc and the store in article master data.
can anyone help me??

any answers?

Similar Messages

Help in config. of Site priority conflict resolution method

Hi,
I am testing Materialized View Replication (one master site and one MV site) .To resolve
conflict I employ Site Priority Conflict Resolution Method but I am not able to insert or update the records. I am getting transaction error while I insert or update the records.
This is my conflict resolution script i used Please help me out.
CONNECT repuser/[email protected]
BEGIN DBMS_REPCAT.SUSPEND_MASTER_ACTIVITY (gname => 'rep_repg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ALTER_MASTER_REPOBJECT (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',type => 'TABLE',ddl_text => 'ALTER TABLE repuser.Name ADD (site VARCHAR2(20))');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.GENERATE_REPLICATION_SUPPORT (sname => 'repuser',oname => 'name',type => 'TABLE',
min_communication => TRUE);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT (gname => 'rep_repg',
type => 'TRIGGER',oname => 'insert_site',sname => 'repuser',ddl_text => 'CREATE TRIGGER repuser.insert_site
BEFORE UPDATE ON repuser.name FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF DBMS_REPUTIL.FROM_REMOTE = FALSE THEN
SELECT global_name INTO :NEW.SITE FROM GLOBAL_NAME;
END IF;END;');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.MAKE_COLUMN_GROUP (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',column_group => 'name_sitepriority_cg',
list_of_column_names => 'S_NO,FIRSTNAME,LASTNAME,site');
END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.DEFINE_SITE_PRIORITY (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_SITE_PRIORITY_SITE (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg',site => 'orcl.world',
priority => 100);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_SITE_PRIORITY_SITE (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg',site => 'mvsite1.world',
priority => 50);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_UPDATE_RESOLUTION (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',column_group => 'name_sitepriority_cg',
sequence_no => 1,method => 'SITE PRIORITY',
parameter_column_name => 'site',
priority_group => 'name_sitepriority_pg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.GENERATE_REPLICATION_SUPPORT (sname => 'repuser',oname => 'Name',type => 'TABLE', min_communication => TRUE);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.RESUME_MASTER_ACTIVITY (
gname => 'rep_repg');END;/

Hi,
I am testing Materialized View Replication (one master site and one MV site) .To resolve
conflict I employ Site Priority Conflict Resolution Method but I am not able to insert or update the records. I am getting transaction error while I insert or update the records.
This is my conflict resolution script i used Please help me out.
CONNECT repuser/[email protected]
BEGIN DBMS_REPCAT.SUSPEND_MASTER_ACTIVITY (gname => 'rep_repg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ALTER_MASTER_REPOBJECT (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',type => 'TABLE',ddl_text => 'ALTER TABLE repuser.Name ADD (site VARCHAR2(20))');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.GENERATE_REPLICATION_SUPPORT (sname => 'repuser',oname => 'name',type => 'TABLE',
min_communication => TRUE);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.CREATE_MASTER_REPOBJECT (gname => 'rep_repg',
type => 'TRIGGER',oname => 'insert_site',sname => 'repuser',ddl_text => 'CREATE TRIGGER repuser.insert_site
BEFORE UPDATE ON repuser.name FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF DBMS_REPUTIL.FROM_REMOTE = FALSE THEN
SELECT global_name INTO :NEW.SITE FROM GLOBAL_NAME;
END IF;END;');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.MAKE_COLUMN_GROUP (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',column_group => 'name_sitepriority_cg',
list_of_column_names => 'S_NO,FIRSTNAME,LASTNAME,site');
END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.DEFINE_SITE_PRIORITY (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_SITE_PRIORITY_SITE (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg',site => 'orcl.world',
priority => 100);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_SITE_PRIORITY_SITE (gname => 'rep_repg',
name => 'name_sitepriority_pg',site => 'mvsite1.world',
priority => 50);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.ADD_UPDATE_RESOLUTION (sname => 'repuser',
oname => 'Name',column_group => 'name_sitepriority_cg',
sequence_no => 1,method => 'SITE PRIORITY',
parameter_column_name => 'site',
priority_group => 'name_sitepriority_pg');END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.GENERATE_REPLICATION_SUPPORT (sname => 'repuser',oname => 'Name',type => 'TABLE', min_communication => TRUE);END;/
BEGIN
DBMS_REPCAT.RESUME_MASTER_ACTIVITY (
gname => 'rep_repg');END;/

Site Priority Conflict Resolution

I'm using Oracle9i version 9.2.0.1.0 running in Windows Server 2003
I am testing Materialized View Replication ( 1 Master site and multiple
materialized view site) for my Advanced Replication setup. To resolve
conflict I employ Site Priority Conflict Resolution Method.
I successfully pushed data from mview site-1 to the master site.
When I pushed data from mview site-2 to the master site with the same
data previously pushed from mview site-1, unique constraint is violated
hence a failure in replication. It seems my conflict resolution is not
working. Can anybody help me resolve my problem?
Arnel

master group - MG_SRD_ALL
exec dbms_repcat.define_site_priority('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE');
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISSPCB1.WORLD', 100);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSPE1.WORLD', 90);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSJH1.WORLD', 80);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSCK1.WORLD', 70);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSST1.WORLD', 60);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSPI1.WORLD', 50);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSPT1.WORLD', 40);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSCB1.WORLD', 30);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISPSTA1.WORLD', 20);
exec dbms_repcat.add_site_priority_site('MG_SRD_ALL', 'SPS BERE', 'GISHSCB1.WORLD', 10);
create snapshot log on &datausr..LESPRUSEK with primary key;
prompt Creating rep. object &datausr..LESPRUSEK in group MG_SRD_ALL
begin
dbms_repcat.create_master_repobject(
gname => '"MG_SRD_ALL"',
type => 'TABLE',
oname => '"LESPRUSEK"',
sname => '"&datausr"',
use_existing_object => TRUE,
copy_rows => TRUE);
end;
EXECUTE sys.DBMS_REPCAT.make_column_group( -
sname => '&datausr', -
oname => 'LESPRUSEK', -
column_group => 'CG_LESPRUSEK', -
LIST_OF_COLUMN_NAMES => ' -
SEMOBJ_ID -
,MSLINK -
,MAPID -
,DATUM -
,DURCHID -
,K_EC -
,EC_OLD -
,TEU_ID -
,K_TYPPTE -
,NNUSEK_ID -
,NNKABEL_ID -
,USEKVVN_ID -
,USEKVN_ID -
,KABELVN_ID -
,DELKA -
,UD_PLOCHA -
,POZNAMKA -
,K_OJ_INFO -
,C_EVSTR -
,C_VP -
,K_ZAR -
,NAZEV_I -
,NAZEV_II -
,SITE_NAME -
,K_PRES_ZAK -
,AU_ID -
begin
dbms_repcat.add_update_resolution(
sname => '&datausr',
oname =>'LESPRUSEK',
column_group => '"CG_LESPRUSEK"',
sequence_no => 0 + 2,
method => 'Site Priority',
parameter_column_name => '"SITE_NAME"',
priority_group => '"SPS BERE"');
end;
EXECUTE sys.DBMS_REPCAT.generate_replication_support( -
sname => '&datausr', -
oname => 'LESPRUSEK', -
type => 'TABLE');
column SITE_NAME - is filled by global_name by trigger
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER &&datausr..TQ_LESPRUSEK
BEFORE INSERT OR UPDATE ON &&datausr..LESPRUSEK FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
IF NOT (DBMS_SNAPSHOT.I_AM_A_REFRESH OR DBMS_REPUTIL.FROM_REMOTE) THEN
:NEW.SITE_NAME := glname_pkg.global_name;
END IF;
END;
show err

Demand priority during Resource allocation

Hi,
We're facing difficulties in getting the expected planned orders -
We've following scenario -
PArt Qty Needed Due date
P1 2700 01/05/2009
P2 2700 01/05/2009
Resource is available 18 hrs/day while usage for both assy is 60 units/hr. ASCP constraints with decision rule plan is creating splitted planned order to complete the demand for both assy rather than completing one of them first and then move to other. Is anyone of you aware of any setups in ASCP, which can decide the priority of Assly on resource based on either assy itself or part category.
The reason of this is that factory planner doesn't want to publish a plan, where they've to change models frequently on one line.
Thanks
Nikhil

Nikhil,
The software does not do exactly what the user is asking for, but you can build a reasonable solution.
They want to release orders based on item category. You can show them how to query planned order based on item category using the Oracle forms "Find" feature. you can also build a process where they can see several planned orders and expose the item category column in the PWB using the "show field" feature. They can now see planned orders by date, by item, by item category. They next adjust the dates as desired and hit release.
You can use the pegging to see the customer for each planned order, but that is time consuming so it should be an exception process. You need to push them on this requirement. If it is an exception process, the pegging provides full visibility and works extremely well. To expand beyonfd this process, get them to use the demand priority column in the PWB to set priorities.
Kevin

Retaining site info during upgrade

Hello All
I recently accepted a new job! Yes! I am going to be the
Design Director for a branding/marketing company. Anyway, my new
boss is going to buy me Adobe CS3 Suite. I will be installing DW
CS3 to replace DW MX - I am afraid of loosing all FTP info - I have
about 10 sites listed.. can I somehow save that info for DW CS3?
Rob
Thanks

> I will be installing DW CS3 to replace DW MX - I am
afraid of loosing
> all FTP info - I have about 10 sites listed
on the same computer, the site definitions should copy up to
the new version
with no problem.
But if you want to take a belt and suspenders approach, make
backups of the
site definition files. MX had this built into it.
dw menu-->Site-->Manage sites
select a site name in the menu, and click the Export button.
Save the .ste
file to a safe place. Rinse/lather/repeat for the other sites
in the list.
An options if you are on windows is a third-party utility.
http://mm-exporter.joexx.de/
Alan
Adobe Community Expert, dreamweaver
http://www.adobe.com/communities/experts/

Resolution priority during SBS2008 to 2011 migration

Hi Everybody
We are halfway through migrating from SBS2008 to 2011
There are a number of issues in BPA on the destination server
View installation issues on the destination server is reporting THE REQUIRED ACTIVE DIRECTORY STRUCTURE WAS NOT CREATED. ACTIVE. The fix this issue for me doesn't work but is this error due to the old server still being promoted/connected
The Netlogon service on the source server keeps going PAUSED
Which do I look at first?
Thanks
Daren

Hello
Open a command prompt, and run "net share"
Check if Sysvol, and Netlogon is shared or not.
Make sure that your server is advertising itself as a DC.
Regards
AkashG

I have lost control. This version does not remember id's and passwords for any sight, makes me re login for every site every time I return to a site even during the same session. With the previous version I did NOT have this problem.

I loved the previous version and this version for me is a downgrade. I am not able to correctly set the option, and I cannot even get the feedback function to operate correctly.

There is a difference between remembering the name and password in the Password Manager and a "remember me" check box on a web page.
The latter usually involves the creation of a special "remember me" cookie that is stored on your computer and that is send to the server.
If that "remember me" cookie is removed or gets corrupted or is not send to the server then the server won't remember you and you need to sign in once again.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Cookies
Websites remembering you and automatically log you in is stored in a cookie.
* Create an allow cookie exception (Tools > Options > Privacy > Cookies: Exceptions) to keep such a cookie, especially for secure websites and if cookies expire when Firefox is closed.
Make sure that you do not run Firefox in Private Browsing mode.
* https://support.mozilla.com/kb/Private+Browsing

How to Create a Custom Project Site Template Using Visual Studio

I know how to make changes and save a site as a template but I need to be able to create a new project site template during deployment to different environments. Trying to have this not be a manual process.

Hello,
This article might help:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sambetts/archive/2013/10/17/creating-a-clean-visual-studio-solution-from-a-sharepoint-2013-site-template.aspx
Start with a default Project Site (create a new site from the Project site template) and save out the WSP then import into VS.
Paul
Paul Mather | Twitter |
http://pwmather.wordpress.com | CPS

Registering iLife '80 on Apple web site

I'm trying to register iLife '08 Family Pack on the Apple web site. During the last step is required the code of the product... while in iWork '08 there is a card in the package with the serial number, for iLife I didn't find any serial.
I tryied to insert a number under the bar code outside the package but apple web site do not accept it.
Any idea where I can find the code?
Thanks!

There should be a number on the sticker the bar code is on similar to Mxxxxx/x. It worked for mine.
Good luck!

Replenishment TR will not generate TO due to max Qty Exceeded

We allow negative stocks in our fixed bins. A TR was created for a replenishment for the bin maximum plus the amount of the negative stock. As a result, the TO will not create due to error message "Maximum quantity for storage bin will be execeeded by NN each.
Stock situation:
Fixed bin avail stock -14
Fixed bin total stock 0
Fixed bin open TO 14 - (which will not be able to be fulfilled w/out a replenishment)
Max allowed in bin 90
Min 40
TR is created and remains open for 109 (this TR was created the previous day when we had negative stock of -19).
I don't know why the TO would not create partially the quantity from the TR as we allow this during the TO create job.
Again, thank you,
Sandy

Hi Sandy,
I think you were removing 14 pcs from your fixed bin, and confirmation still hadn't taken place.
I did the same in my system and executing report RLAUTA10 I got error message L3369. When I was trying to do it manually, processing the TR from LB10 I received the same error message you got.
1. The problem is that until the stock removal isn't confirmed SAP doesn't consider the stock removal, total stock level is same as before the creation of the TO
2. The indicator in RLAUTA10 report you are speaking about is not to allow partial processing of TR, it is to allow the processing of partial TR.
...whether transfer orders can be created for partially processed transfer requirements.
(F1 help for the field)
3. Under certain circumtainces it is possible to get partial TO in such situation: if in the first bin, from which SAP wants to remove the stock and put into fix bin, is less stock than the difference between maximum stock level and total stock - of course this is just a remark and is worth of nothing concerning business process.
Despite these things I think your claim is justful and natural since this behaviour of SAP can cause problems (in business processes). If you cannot find out anything / won't receive any better reply, maybe you should contact SAP to discuss this thing.
Please read what SAP help says:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/fd/90fbf4b3cd11d3b2ad0050045571f7/frameset.htm
(I think of two-step confirmation here)
Please also check this thread about immediate TO creation during replenishment:
http://www.sapfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=319344
Regards.
Csaba
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Oct 11, 2008 8:05 PM

Site not found in Google search

Perhaps a basic issue but one that's giving me a headache.
What is the best and cheapest method of getting a site found during
a google search. ?
Any words of wisdom would be hugely appreciated.
????

Yeah, but it's still not going to work if you've got your
whole Flash site
embedded into a single html page. Google asks you to create a
robot.txt
file in order for your Flash site to be listed by them, but
I've never found
any comprehensible specs on how to make that file. Anyone got
these?
The only thing I know of that works is to recreate your whole
site in html
as well as the Flash site. This, of course is an unsatisfying
pain in the
rumpus!
KB
"dagurluknow" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:fpeniu$eqf$[email protected]..
> The meta data needs to go between the <head> and
</head> tags in your html
>
> <meta name="keywords" content="
keywords go here " />
> <meta name="description" content="
Description goes here " />
>

Replenishment method

Dear experts,
i have maintained all config for replenishment control. I have maintained replenishment method 2 ( Immediate TO for Random Storage) in the configuration. I hope that this means when an outbound pick causes the stock to fall below the minimum, an immediate replenishment TO is created. I have maintained mail control indicator to check if an error log gets created.
I seem to get an error in the process. As soon as i confirm the Outbound TO, i get the following inbox message error log.
"Error during creation of replenishment transfer order from TO confirmation
Error during replenishment for mat.xxxxxxx whse no.stor.type
Material xxxxxxx has no capacity checking data for warehouse"
I do not have any capacity checking active. Is capacity check necessary for this type of replenishment to work?

Hi Guest.
No, you do not need to run capacity check on your ST for random replenishment. We use this method without any complications and the storage type is not set for capacity checks. Check your config on the storage type master to see if the capacity check is activated and determine if you realy need this.
Cheers,
Hein

Consumption during the processing time of the production order

Which adjustments must be made in the material master for the calculation of the lot size in the MRP run, that the consumption of the material during the processing time of the production order is considered for the calculation of the lot size.

Hi ,
You have to judiciously indicate the re order point in the material master( the re-order point is the sum of saftey stock and consumption during replenishment lead time).
How ever , this does not in any way influence the lot size , but only influence the no of lots i.e the procurement proposals. The lot size is determined by the lot sizing procedure selected by you , depending on various factors like agrrements with your vendor , optimum lot sizes to reduce the cost of procurment and storages etc.
You can refer to the following url for details on lot size :http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fe/819b9f643b11d3b4e40004ac160649/frameset.htm
and for details about re order point :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/db/6f143ea7ec11d3a8330000e82a3c24/frameset.htm
Hope this information will be useful.
Regards
Raghuramam.

Multiple primary site - Discovery issue

Hi,
I am working on a scenario where there is 1 CAS and 3 Primary sites(PS1,PS2,PS3). At PS1 site, Active directory system Discovery is only configured and all the OU for all the sites are added. On the other two Primary sites this discovery was not configured.
Now I wanted to ask is there any issue due to this , or should I have to configure this discovery on both sites??
Thanks
Pallavi

no, you can still control that. Site Assignment is either based on an AD Query or you hard coding the site code during the install process. Client deployment depends on the method, in this process content boundary Groups and DP's are being used.
Kent Agerlund | My blogs: blog.coretech.dk/kea and
SCUG.dk/ | Twitter:
@Agerlund | Linkedin: Kent Agerlund |
Mastering ConfigMgr 2012 The Fundamentals

How do SAP select the correct DC to issue stock out to store

Hi,
An additional warehouse had been configured to store Chinese books.
The current warehouse and the new warehouse are holding the same title.
How can I configure the system such that
a.     when the STOCK TRANSPORT order is being raise, it would default to the new warehouse and not the existing warehouse.
        This is to prevent human error on keying in the wrong warehouse to supply out.
b.     during store replenishment, how to let system to replenish from the new warehouse?
Please guide me.
Thanks
bye

Hi,
Setting in both lines? Are you talking about supply-site in MC of site master?
In that case if 2 lines exist with different DC's as supply source then - priority will be considered . There a field which defines the priority .
Supplying site priority
If a number of supplying plants are to be valid for a plant or plant group at the same time/during the same period, you must enter a priority for supply source determination.
If supply source determination finds several supplying plants that are valid for a plant or plant group at the same time/during the same period, the system checks the sequence of priority; the supplying plant with value 00 has the highest priority. This means that the system first checks the supplying plant with priority 00 to determine whether it can be used as the supply source.
In the standard system, there is a check on whether listing conditions exist for a material. A user exit can be used for further checks (e.g. availability)." SAP EXPLANATION"

Site priority during replenishment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for