SLD Landscape Question

Hi
We are about to implement the SLD landscape for our PI systems.
From the documentation (SDN and HELP.SAP.COM), it is recommended to have all SLD Data Suppliers send to the PI Production SLD Bridge.  The SLD data is then automatically forwarded to the DEV/QA SLD Bridge (Design Time SLD).
This is straight forward and I can see how to get the ABAP stack to look at the correct SLD Server.
However, when it comes to the JAVA stack, I can't see how to configure the SLD CLIENT of an instance in the design-time landscape to use the design-time SLD Server.
Version of Netweaver in 7.0.
Thanks
Doug

SAP Web AS (Java) 6.30/6.40 Start-up: JProbe's Direct Support
This feature is available starting with JProbe 5.2.2. For details of application server integration, refer to the JProbe documentation. Here, the single steps for the SAP application server are briefly described.
Step 1: Create an Integration for the instance to be profiled.
      Click Tools -> Application Server Integration.
      Choose SAP Application Server 6.30.
      Click Create.
      To fill out the columns, follow the help you get via tooltip.
      Specify whether server or dispatcher should be profiled.
Step 2: Create a Configuration.
      Click Tools -> Manage J2EE Configurations.
      Click Add.
      Fill in Configuration Name and Integration.
      Optionally, you could specify an application to be profiled; this is just used to help to set the correct filters for profiling. If you know which packages or classes should be profiled, you can leave these fields empty; otherwise, specify the directory where the application is deployed and the .ear or .war file in this directory.
Step 3: Create the J2EE Settings.
      Click Session -> New J2EE Settings.
      Specify the configuration.
      Specify the other options, especially set filters (optionally, you could use the application specified in the configuration for filtering).
Step 4: Use the Connection Manager.
      Different to "startup via jlaunch" below the Connection Manager has to be used.
      Click Tools -> Options -> Advanced Session; mark "Use Connection Manager."
Step 5: Check the property 'IDxxxxxx.JavaPath' in instance.properties in the directory /usr/sap/<SID>/JCxx/j2ee/cluster
      JProbe relies on the property to find Java home, but there are Web AS 6.30/6.40 SPs that do not have this property.
      If it is not included, add it for dispatcher or server (dependent on which one should be profiled)
      For example, add "ID8156650.JavaPath=C:/java/jdk1.4.2_06."
      Be aware that using the standard startup procedure instance.properties is overwritten, so you might repeat this step.
Step 6: Start the J2EE Engine with JProbe
      Start the database and the central instance (enqueue and message server).
      In JProbe click "Run" for the J2EE settings defined before.
      Dispatcher and server of the J2EE Engine will be started; the one specified in the Integration will be profiled.
SAP Web AS (Java) 6.30/6.40 Start-up: Using JProbe 5.2.x via JLaunch
Starting the Server via JLaunch
Detailed instructions how to start JLaunch can be found in the documentation of SAP Web AS (Java). Here we give only the minimal list of steps:
   1.
      Include the location of JLaunch in the PATH
   2.
      Go to base directory of dispatcher or server (depending on which one you want to start).
      jlaunch pf=c:\usr\sap\<SID>\SYS\profile\<SID>_JCxx_<Host>                   
      -nodename=IDxxxxxxx 
      where "IDxxxxxxx" can be figured out from the "instance.properties" in directory "cluster."
Creating a JProbe Startup File
In order to start up JProbe via JLaunch, you need to create a start-up file (.jpl) with the JProbe launchpad as follows:
   1.
      Click Session -> New J2SE Settings
   2.
      Enter filters, triggers, ...
   3.
      In the Configuration main class and the classpath fields are mandatory; a dummy entry for main class is sufficient, for classpath you could use %CLASSPATH%
   4.
      Save the .jpl file
   5.
      Switch off the Connection Manager; in JProbe 5.2.x a Connection Manager is introduced, which does not work if a Java application is started from a C-framework; therefore use Tools -> Options -> Session -> Advanced to switch off the Connection Manager
   6.
      Change the .jpl file with a text editor
            Comment out the line starting with -jp_java
            Add the connection information and the snapshot directory information; related to the introduction of the Connection Manager this is not written when the .jpl file is saved in the launchpad
                o
                  -jp_socket=<host for analysis>:<port> (e.g. localhost:4444)
                o
                  -jp_snapshot_dir=<snapshot directory> (e.g. c:
Jprobe
snapshots)
Starting JProbe with the Server
Start JLaunch as above, but attach the following parameters to the JLaunch command line:
jlaunch pf=... -nodename=... -Xbootclasspath/a:JProbe-Base-Dir\lib\jpagent.jar
            -Xrunjprobeagent:-jp_input=.jpl-file
For the .jpl-file please, specify the complete path. If there are blanks in the file or directory names, use double quotes or the DOS notation (e.g. PROGRA~1). After starting JLaunch you can now attach the viewer to it (JProbe -> Program -> Attach to Remote/Running Session).
regards
chandra

Similar Messages

  • SLD Landscape Best Practice recomendation

    I am seeking advise on setting up SLD in my ever growing landscape.
    I currently have a Master SLD on the same system as my NWDI system and a local SLD on my Solution manager 7.0 system that is updated from the master.
    The Master SLD is shared by our ECC6 Duel Stack landscape and my BI 70 Duel stack portal landscape.
    I have upcoming projects of implementing a PI 7.1 landscape, implementing CTS+ and a Solution Manager Enterprise upgrade all of which will be heavily dependent on SLD.  
    I have seen documentation that PI would like it's own local SLD.
    My question is what would be the prefered SLD landscape and how to I get there.  Any recomendations or best practices would be most appreciated.
    Bill Stouffer
    Basis Administrator.

    Hi,
    SLD that we have implemented in our landscape is like bleow:
    1) All PI  and Portal system has local SLD.
    2) For all non- production system, we have one SLD and production system we have seperate SLD.
    3) It means we are following 3 tier SLD landscape as resommended by SAP.
    4) Main SLd lies on solman, for production  we have seperate and non-production we have seperate. non production and production sld sent data to main sld that is on solman.
    4) All systems except PI and portal send data to production and non-production sld. PI and portal systems first send data to local which in turns send to production and non-production sld.
    5) So by this way you whole environment is secure as production sld is different.
    So, i will recommend to have 3 tier SLD approach. One of the important thing is don't use cenrtal user to send data across SLD as one user lock will in turns be the fallback of whole environment. So, always make each system specific user for data transfer so that user lock of one system will not impact other.
    If you need any other information please let me know.
    Thanks
    Sunny

  • CIM Modle in SLD landscape

    Hi all,
    I read few blogs before CIM/CR content update, when I see in my SLD landscape I do not see CIM model, I can only see CR content,
    my requirement is to update both CIM and CR, since I do not find CIM model I got confused..
    can anyone clarify...

    Hi Gaurav and Arun,
    thanks for the reply, now I got CIM and CR content version,
    I read note 669669, this is really helpful.
    CIM update is straight forward, latest version can be deployed, CR content I have to check how many sequences to import.
    thanks,

  • E-Rec 300 as EFP, landscape question

    Sorry, wrong forum. Post moved to E-Rec 300 as EFP, landscape question
    Message was edited by:
            Shehryar Khan

    Hi All,
    also have requirement of modifying Standard Workflow WS WS51800008.
    I have done following setting in SPRO.
    SAP E-rec->Technical Settings>Workflow--> Click On documentation of Set Up Approval Process for Requisition (Workflow) and there it has given you the clear Explanation about defining parameters in the Txn WF_EXTSRV
    after this i did GENERATE TASK and it generated a new TASK. but in this config it asks for Logical system and i am not sure which logical system i have to give so i have kept is blank..
    so is this Logival System Necessary?? and  how to maintain it..casue  it is not maintained in SM59..
    I have also done URL settings in WF_Handcust.
    Also in SICF when i tested my service /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hrrcf_approval/application.bsp it gives me following error...
    SAP Note
    The following error text was processed in the system:
    BSP Exception: Das Objekt default.htm in der URL /sap/bc/bsp/sap/hrrcf_approval/default.htm?sap-client=668&sap-sessioncmd=open ist nicht gültig.
    so gurus kindly suggest me what should be done to make this workflow running...also i m modifying this workflow to add 1 dialog task so do i need to make this entry foe this task in SWFVISU??
    thanks in advance....

  • SLD Landscape Design Question

    After reading the Planning Guide - System Landscape Directory, I am left with a question.
    The Setup:
    Standard three system landscape
    ECC 6.0 Ehp5 on NW 7.02ECC Instances: DE1, QE1, PE1
    PI 7.31
    PI Instances: DP1, QP1, PP1
    PI Business Systems: DE1CLNT100, QE1CLNT100, PE1CLNT100
    Each PI Instance has a local SLD
    Management LandscapeSolution Manager 7.1 on NW 7.02
    SolMan Instance: SP1
    Local SLD
    LMDB
    Reading through the Planning Guide, the recommendation (pg. 45, picture below) seems to be to have all systems self-report to PP1. That is, without synchronization, only PP1 knows about any systems because they all report to PP1 and do not report in to their local SLDs. The data is then sent back to DP1 & QP1 via bridge forwarding. Business Systems are manually entered into their respective local SLDs, but then have to be manually exported/imported from DP1 --> QP1 --> PP1. Once it's all gathered into PP1 again, all data is pushed to SolMan's SLD on SP1 via a unidirectional content synchronization.
    If I read this correctly, then all SLD's will end up "knowing" all systems and business systems: e.g. the sld of DP1 will have entries for QP1 and PP1 and for business systems QE1CLNT100 and PECLNT100.
    Earlier in the guide, I gathered that there was value in not having all of the data in Development in that there is then clear separation between non-production SLDs and production SLDs. The above recommended setup seems to go against this idea of separation. Plus, it requires a significant amount of manual upkeep.
    As an alternative (pictured below), what if each environment only reported to it's local SLD (DE1 --> DP1, QE1--> QP1, PE1--PP1). (Note that in the picture the SLD is drawn separate, but I've heard that most customers run their local SLD on PI, so the SLD depicted in each environment actually runs on the PI system in this scenario.) Further, what if the SLD's then synchronized sequentially in a full unidirectional content sync fashion. (DP1 does a full uni-directional Content Sync to QP1, QP1 does a full uni-directional Content Sync to PP1, and PP1 does a full uni-directional Content Sync to SP1.)
    DP1 would only know about it's own systems. QP1 would know about it's own plus DP1 (which it needs). PP1 and SP1 would both have full visibility into all systems.  Furthermore, the manually entered business systems would also be automatically synchronized and the whold manual export/import process could be avoided or  a manual export/import could be implemented between Q and Production for safety with an automatic bridge forward of Data Supplier data.
    Are there downsides to the second scenario that I am not seeing? Please comment!
    Best regards,
      --Tom

    Although the guide states that Dev systems only needs to know about other systems in the DEV environment and QAS systems only needs to know about systems in the DEV and QAS environments and only PRD needs to know all systems, I am finding that I can't get the groups set up correctly when the DEV environment has no visibility to the QAS environment.
    It seems that the recommended structure (where all systems are known in all environments) will facilitate the correct setup of the PI transports. So far, that is the biggest arguement I've been able to find against the second approach outlined above. Using full sync all the way through is also not an option if you're doing any development as any changes in the DEV system automatically flow through to PRD almost instantly. Using automatic bridge forwarding and import/export might be a usable alternative, but the recommended approach from page 41 of the planning guide does seem to have the best of all worlds.

  • BW Landscape Question - DEV and QAS in same Environment

    Hi,
    I do have a doubt about the following Landscape of my client:
    ECC - PRD CLNT 100 --> BW Prod
    ECC- DEV CLNT 400 --> BW Dev
    ECC- DEV CLNT 100
    Basically
    ECC- DEV CLNT 400 has MasterData but NO customizing !!
    ECC- DEV CLNT 100 has NO MasterData but Cusomtizing !
    First I pointed the Source System to DEV CLNT 100 but as has no MData that though was no point on having such connection.
    So created the landscape as above described.
    The only draw back I can see is that every time I activate some BI_CONT in BWD it replicates it in DEV CLNT 400 for which the client is not open for customization so get the message "no authorization for..."
    So the procedure is to activate the Datasources (in ECC) on CLNT 100 where is open for Custo and is automatically visible on CLNT 400.
    Think the landscape described above is a proper one or can see any pitfall ?
    thank you,
    AM

    Hi Alex
    Regarding your question, there is no right or wrong approach, but one has to understand the purpose of the multiple clients on a system, plan accordingly and depending on the business requirements this drives the landscape.
    On a development system, you can have multiple clients for various purposes and have the BW system linked to the relevant client:
    - Customizing
    - Testing (prefered BW Development connection to an ERP Development system)
    - Play
    In response to your question, it is a good approach to following and the only pitfall would be someone trying to do transactions in the customizing client and the BW system not been able to extract the data for testing purposes.
    Currently I have my BW Development system pointing a ERP Development system which contains 3 clients:
    - 1 Client (i.e. 200) for Customizing (customizing only, no transaction data).
    - 1 Client (i.e. 220) for Play (copy from the ERP production system which contains master and transaction data).
    - 1 Client (i.e. 230) for Testing (copy from the ERP production system which contains master and transaction data).
    For the testing and play clients, we can also refresh the data if required, generally we try to do this ever 3 months or when there is a large project to be done, i.e. fiscal year change).
    Of these 3 clients, my BW Development system only points to the ERP System's Testing client (client 230) so that the we can test extractions on master and transaction data. All developments done in the ERP Development system for BW is done in the customizing client (client 200), since most of the development work is client independent regarding the extractors, so it would then be automatically in the testing client. We have been using this approach for the last 5 years, with no major issues.
    PS: The only issue you may have is regarding the extractors that use classification (transaction CTBW) as there is a client specific issue refer to OSS Note: 588184.
    Regards
    Derek

  • Help about ESS/MSS - Deploy error and landscape question

    Hi.
    I read a lot of post about this topic, but I continue something confuse about them.
    I want to configure ESS and MSS.
    My landscape is:
    -  J2EE 7.0 with Portal 7.0 (2004s) in a server “A”.
    - ECC 5.0 ( with HR component SP05) in a server “B”.
    Server “B”, has only stack Abap.
    Server “A” is the latest version of Netweaver today. (stack j2ee and stack abap, BI, XI, Portal, etc)
    I download and deploy in server A (J2EE 7.0), this components:
    - BP ESS for erp2004
    - BP MSS for erp2004
    When I deploy the ESS BP, the deployment break raising this kind of error with the most of components, for example:
    <i><b>
    ===========================================================================
    Deployment started Tue Apr 10 12:01:57 ART 2007
    ===========================================================================
    Starting Deployment of ess/au/addr
    Aborted: development component 'ess/au/addr'/'sap.com'/'MAIN_xss04PAT_C'/'1178669'/'0', grouped by software component 'SAP_ESS'/'sap.com'/'MAIN_xss04PAT_C'/'1000.100.0.15.1.20070309085432''/'0':
    Caught exception during application deployment from SAP J2EE Engine's deploy service:
    java.rmi.RemoteException: Cannot deploy application sap.com/essauaddr.. Reason: Clusterwide exception: Failed to deploy application sap.com/essauaddr. Check causing exception for details (trace file). Hint: Are all referenced components deployed and available on the engine?; nested exception is:      com.sap.engine.services.deploy.container.DeploymentException: Clusterwide exception: Failed to deploy application sap.com/essauaddr. Check causing exception for details (trace file). Hint: Are all referenced components deployed and available on the engine?
    (message ID: com.sap.sdm.serverext.servertype.inqmy.extern.EngineApplOnlineDeployerImpl.performAction(DeploymentActionTypes).REMEXC)
    Deployment of ess/au/addr finished with Error (Duration 5187 ms)
    Starting Deployment of SAP_ESS
    Aborted: software component 'SAP_ESS'/'sap.com'/'MAIN_xss04PAT_C'/'1000.100.0.15.1.20070309085432''/'0':
    Failed deployment of SDAs:
    development component 'ess/au/addr'/'sap.com'/'MAIN_xss04PAT_C'/'1178669'/'0' : aborted
    Please, look at error logs above for more information!
    Deployment of SAP_ESS finished with Error (Duration 4781 ms)
    </i></b>
    Obviously, for this reason the most of iviews raise errors. A few of these works ok.
    I assign role, and others configuration steps, this part I thinks that is OK
    I configured the Jco, the role in Portal, the profile in ERP for ESS, etc.
    My principal question is:
    Can I use Portal 7.0 against ECC 5.0 in order tu use ESS/MSS based on webdynpro, without stack j2ee in ECC server (“B”) ?
    Is necesary install J2ee stack in my server B ? or not?
    Where I need to deploy the XSS 500 components ? in the J2EE 7.0 ?
    Why when I deploy have this problem and the most of components can’t deploy it?
    For my landscape, which is the recommended setup ?
    thanks in advance.!
    Leandro.

    My principal question is:
    Can I use Portal 7.0 against ECC 5.0 in order tu use ESS/MSS based on webdynpro, without stack j2ee in ECC server (“B”) ?
    <b>You can use Portal 7.0 against ECC 5.0</b>
    Is necesary install J2ee stack in my server B ? or not?
    <b>You don't need to install J2EE stack on ECC system</b>
    Where I need to deploy the XSS 500 components ? in the J2EE 7.0 ?
    <b>Deploy XSS on Portal server not on ECC.</b>
    Why when I deploy have this problem and the most of components can’t deploy it?
    <b>There won't be any issue. Go for ERP 2005</b>
    For my landscape, which is the recommended setup ?
    <b>As per the landscape mentioned by you, I will suggest go for ERP 2005 & XSS 600.</b>
    If you have further queries, mail me at [email protected]

  • BOE/BW landscape question

    HAd a question about managing/configuring BOE in a BW environment.
    We are planning to have many non-production systems in our BW landscape. (Dev, Dev+1, Product test, Performance Test, Training..etc).
    If we are also including BOE in our environment (Webi, Infoview, etc), do we need a corresponding BOE environment for each BW environment?
    We currenrly make all BW changes in our develpment environment and transport thru the landscape to all other environments. Wondering how that works for BO objects , what systems need to be set up, and what is best practice for this and managing changes through the landscape.
    Seems that a separate BOE environment for every non-prod BW implies additional cost (hardware and licensing) and we are trying to determine the best scenario.
    But also want to maitain the control of versions and changes through the landscape and ability to test them as they progress through.
    Thanks.

    My recommendation is to have a 1-1 setup.
    There are two kinds of connections between BO and SAP.
    1) Authentication connections
    2) Data connections.
    Authentication connections allow your SAP users to use the credentials to log into the BO system. You can indeed create more than one authentication connections within a BOBJ system.
    Data connections retrieve data from SAP sources into your BOBJ reports. A single report/dashboard (WebI,CR,XCelsius) can connect to several SAP data sources at once. But you cannot dynamically change the name of the system you are connecting to. At least not by applying generic BOBJ functionality.
    SAP Business Objects offers the LifeCycle Manager to help you manage the life cycle of your projects in a multi-leveled environment.
    Assuming you are using a single BOBJ installation for multiple SAP systems you have to make sure that the security is well defined in order to separate your development from your production environment. You will probably have to work with separate
    folders to host your different environments. In this case you will not be able to use all capabilities of the LCM (like mapping of data connections).
    Regards,
    Stratos

  • SLD import question.

    Hi,
    I have question regarding SLD CIM. I have two SLD which I am tranporting the SLD content.
    For target SLD the CIM model version is lower than the Source SLD CIm Model.
    While doing import it has given two warning, but allowed me to import.
    That wanring is about Data inconsistency. I would like to know what kind of implications may happen in this case and how to resolve them.
    Thanks,
    Srinivas

    from http://service.sap.com/swdc  via the path
         Support Packages and Patches->SAP Technology Components ->SAP CR CONTENT
    download CR contents
    then upload via: SLD -> Administration -> Import
    I believe that there are two update here, they should be in sequence. Not sure if you have wrong sequence or not.
    Regards.
    Liang
    Edited by: Liang Ji on May 5, 2009 6:15 AM

  • SLD Migration question

    Hi Team,
    We recently did SLD migratin as per note :- 720717  ( Reduce the number of System Landscape Directories (SLD)  ).
    Now when we execute tx.code SXMB_IFR -
    > It opens a page with XI tools  like integration builder, SLD etc---->after clicking to the SLD  it points to the old SLD.
    Please let me know if nybody has idea how to change it?
    Best  Regards,
    Tushar.

    Hi Tushar
    Firstly I highly recommend backing up the source SLD with a full backup, export ALL and individual exports of each export line LD, CR etc and keeping it alive it until migration is complete
    Its possible that the old SLD location is still cached - was the cached cleared ?- were all locations where the SLD URL was defined in XI, API, data supplier connections and business systems (and business system definitions)
    changed to reflect the new SLD URL ?
    Was the target SLD already live and being used with other ABAP clients or has it been freshly installed and empty - at the same time was any import made into the target SLD (from source SLD) - other than CIM from /swdc?
    Best wishes
    Stuart

  • Landscape question using XI

    We are a SAP partner and host a SAP All-in-one solution for let's assume 10 customers. They all have their own ECC, BW and Portal instance for production.
    My question is:
    do they all need to have their own XI production system or should we go for one XI production system?
    Thanks in advance for your answers.

    Hi,
    A single XI production server will do but it will in turn arise 2 types of situations.
    1) If there is a single system, then u should prevent SPOF (Single Point of Failure)
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/0f00c890-0201-0010-beb2-c96050edc426
    2) Using the single system may hit the performance. Load balancing could solve the problem in this case
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c3d9d710-0d01-0010-7486-9a51ab92b927
    Regards,
    Prateek

  • Basic landscape question in 2004s environment

    Hi All,
    This may be a bit repetitive..but I couldn't find the exact answer. Hence raising this.
    We have a  BI7.0 box and EP6.0 box. But EP is not connected to BI as of now.
    1. Do we need to install EP7 and BI java additionally on this BI box or do they get
        installed by default?
        If yes, how to activate them? since 3.x web reports are running fine but 7.0 are    not.
    2. what is a federated portal? i saw a detailed blog..a simple explanation will help a lot.
    any help is highly appreciated.
    thanks
    vishno

    Do we need to install EP7 and BI java additionally
    <i>> on this BI box or do they get
    >     installed by default?</i> --> Yes, this has to be installed seperately, can be on the same server (hardware). See attached document for the different options on landscape.
    https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/~sapdownload/011000358700005089192006E/NW04s_BExWebSysLandscapes.pdf
    <i> what is a federated portal? i saw a detailed
    > blog..a simple explanation will help a lot.</i> --> In a complex landscape if you have different Portals you can have one central portal as the consumer portal and diffrerent producer portals (BI, CRM etc.)
    Check the diagram in the link below.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/67/7e70424edcc553e10000000a1550b0/content.htm

  • ERP2004 and BI Content landscape question

    Hello,
    Quoting the installation guide :-
    "SAP Business Information Warehouse (SAP BW 3.5)
    A restriction exists if you wish to operate Business Information Warehouse and ERP Central Component in the same system. In a production environment, this setup can only be supported on a project basis. If you are interested in implementing this setup, contact SAP. Nevertheless, a common client for SAP BW 3.5 and SAP ECC 5.0 is not supported."
    Does this mean that on a three suystem landscape you would activate the 3.5 content on DEV and QAS and have a seperate PRO system for ERP2004 and one for PRO BI ??
    If yes then how do you deliver conistent configuration transports to the 2 PRO systems ??
    Many thanks in advance.
    Alex

    Hi
    you just need to do the integration steps in Box1 use this link for configuring and have the  <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/45/2f76471ca96d7be10000000a114a6b/content.htm">link</a>
    Its quite very similar with EP6  integration. you might need some additional  portal content specific to BI in Box2 to operate fully.
    regards
    mohan

  • Portrait/Landscape Question

    Using Reports 6i
    I have a report that has it's orientation set to default in the Header, Main and Trailer section in the Layout Editor. However, the width is set to 11 and the height to 8.5 in the same properties.
    When the report is run through the previewer and printed, it prints in portrait. When it is run on the web, it prints in landscape. Changing the orientation had no effect but if I change the width and height round, it prints in portrait.
    What are the controlling properties for determining whether a report prints in landscape or portrait? From this example, it seems that it is the size properties but from reading countless other posts, it seems they all should work inconjunction!
    Any help will be appreciated!

    I'm not really sure what's wrong with the switch settings, but I think I can help you get it out of portrait orientation.   Double press the home button to bring up the list of multi-tasking apps at the bottom of the screen.  Slide your finger to the right at the bottom of the screen and you'll see some options.  On the far left of these options is an icon with an arrow.  If it is locked, the icon should look like this–
    If the switch were set to control rotation, the icon would turn mute on and off instead.
    Simply tap the icon on the left and it should unlock the orientation.
    Hope this'll help!

  • IPhone 4S landscape question

    Is the iPhone 4S supposed to work in landscape mode when doing searches in the App Store and other non-internet searches?

    Nope, sorry. Safari supports landscape mode, but the App Store does not.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Using N95 as a Modem Via USB on O2UK Network

    Hi I am trying to connect to the internet with my laptop using the N95 as a modem via USB. I have tried a couple of different ways to do this. I've tried using the one touch access in Nokia PC suite and it gets up to the part where it says "verifying

  • How to calculate average of step-shaped waveform?

    hello, i have analog waveform which looks like an incremental step function... the step increments in fixed time duration of 'x' sec, and stays at a near constant value, but has some noise (ex. attached image) i would like to find out the average of

  • Running another thread not to block UI

    I do some heavy operation inside the actionPerformed (load images from File Chooser, resize it for display and populate it in the ScrollPane etc) and I realize that the windows freezes until the whole operation is finished. And it doesn't really help

  • Configuring problem in tomcat

    i am trying to implement hibernate through tomcat. but cant able to do it...I am using hibernate3.0.3 and tomcat 4.1...can anyone suggest a solution. thanks Tapan

  • Windows Color Management in Control Panel Settings?

    I know enough to disable color management in the printer driver when I enable my photo editing software (PS Elements) to handle color management. However, what should thecorrect setting for Color Management be in the Windows 7 Control Panel. Assuming