SLD on different service pack

Hi,
Our XI system is being upgraded to SP16 in a short while. Now, we have a DEV system, a Quality Assurance system, and a Production system. Our SLD is installed on the DEV system and functions as a central SLD, so QA and PRD use the same SLD.
My question is: Is it possible to have the SLD on a different service pack than Production? We want to implement SP16 on DEV first (which includes the SLD) and then QA and finally Prod, but there is going to be a gap of one to two weeks. Will the production system (which is on SP12) still function correctly, or do we have to upgrade the service pack on all systems at once?
Thanks in advance!
Yordy

Hi Yordy,
Theoretically, the SLD can have a different SP (as long as it is equal or highr, it is okay). What needs to be the same is the CIM model version.
Cheers
Manish

Similar Messages

Installing different service packs into one server

Hi,
I was just wondering is there any way in which i can incorporate different service packs into one server?Any clue with regards to this is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi
The basic concept of applying SPs in Java is to add the new functionality and remove the gaps which were in previous releases. And always when we are using the Java instance the current SP is recognised. Before the deployment of a software component, the SDM server performs additional version checks. Only new software components that have a higher counter than the counter of the old software components can be deployed.
When we apply the SP in Java, following things are checked:
The vendors and the names of the SCAs are the same as the ones of the software components that are installed on the system.
The releases of the SCAs are the same as the ones of the software components that are installed on the system. JSPM allows updates only within one release.
The support package levels of the SCAs are higher than or equal to the ones of the software components that are installed on the system.
If the support package levels of the SCAs are equal to the ones of the software components that are installed on the system, the patch levels of the SCAs are higher.
Checks for modified software components
If the provider of an SCA is different from the original provider, SAP AG, of the software component that is installed on the system, this SCA has been modified using the NWDI.
Checks on foreign software components
The JSPM checks if, after the deployment of a software component, the dependencies on other software components are fulfilled.
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/1f/c45b4211aac353e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Is it possible to have different service pack between Exchange servers.

Is it possible to have CAS Exchange 2007 running service Pack 1 and Mailbox server 2007 running SP2? In my env I need to have SP1 running on CAS server for some applications but also need to install SP2 for migration. Application cannot be upgraded so
I am thinking to keep one CAS running SP1 and upgrade other Exchange 2007 servers to SP2. Please suggest.

Hi,
It is recommended to have the same service pack level on all Exchange 2007 servers, different service pack level may have potential effects.
Here is a related thread for your reference.
Exchange servers with different Service pack levels
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/88e22daf-7ccb-49c3-97d8-f339336476da/exchange-servers-with-different-service-pack-levels?forum=exchangesvrdeploylegacy
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Different service packs

Hello,
could someone help me with the different service packs available in XI

Krishnan,
Check this thread where you will find all the service pack release notes:
Release notes for nw2004-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/d00cb4a7073ab3e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Release notes for nw2004S-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/57/a21f407b402402e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Regards,
---Satish

Different service packs in admin server and managed server

Hi,
Has anybody successfully used a WebLogic 6.1 SP1 managed server that
connects to a WebLogic 6.1 SP 2 admin server?
BEA's docs claim:
"The Administration Server must be running the same version of
WebLogic Server as the Managed Servers in its domain. The
Administration Server must also have the same or later service pack
installed as the Managed Servers in its domain. For example, the
Administration Server could be running version 6.1, Service Pack 2
while the Managed Servers are running version 6.1, Service Pack 1."
This is precisely what we want to do, but it's not working. In this
case, we need to run the admin server and managed server on the same
machine, but we need the managed server to run SP 1 to work around a
bug in SP 2. So to our initial installation of WebLogic 6.1 SP 2,
where I run the admin server, I added a second installation, this time
WebLogic 6.1 SP 1, with a different BEA_HOME. When I start the
managed server from this second installation, I can see from the logs
that it is starting up correctly as 6.1 SP 1. But then it fails with
a ClassCastException when connecting to the admin server (I have
included the stack trace below). This seems typical of version
compatibility problems I've had when I've tried connecting to a server
with a client of a different version.
But in this case, you are supposed to be able to have the managed
server with a lower service pack. Does this work for anybody? Has
anybody encountered the problem I'm having? Note that the servers are
not clustered, if that makes any difference, and we have a custom
security realm in addition to the default file realm (though "system"
of course is in the default file realm).
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jim Doyle
[email protected]
####<Aug 8, 2002 10:25:38 AM EDT> <Emergency> <Server></server>
<chile.iso-ne.com> <webui
server> <main> <system> <> <000000> <Unable to initialize the server:
'Fatal ini
tialization exception
Throwable: java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
Start server side stack trace:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.authenticate(BootServicesImpl.java:189)
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.invoke(BootServicesImpl.java:145)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:620)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:581)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:164)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:640)
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:454)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.deliverGoodNews(PosixSocketMuxer.java:456)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:385)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:24)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
End server side stack trace

Hi,
Has anybody successfully used a WebLogic 6.1 SP1 managed server that
connects to a WebLogic 6.1 SP 2 admin server?
BEA's docs claim:
"The Administration Server must be running the same version of
WebLogic Server as the Managed Servers in its domain. The
Administration Server must also have the same or later service pack
installed as the Managed Servers in its domain. For example, the
Administration Server could be running version 6.1, Service Pack 2
while the Managed Servers are running version 6.1, Service Pack 1."
This is precisely what we want to do, but it's not working. In this
case, we need to run the admin server and managed server on the same
machine, but we need the managed server to run SP 1 to work around a
bug in SP 2. So to our initial installation of WebLogic 6.1 SP 2,
where I run the admin server, I added a second installation, this time
WebLogic 6.1 SP 1, with a different BEA_HOME. When I start the
managed server from this second installation, I can see from the logs
that it is starting up correctly as 6.1 SP 1. But then it fails with
a ClassCastException when connecting to the admin server (I have
included the stack trace below). This seems typical of version
compatibility problems I've had when I've tried connecting to a server
with a client of a different version.
But in this case, you are supposed to be able to have the managed
server with a lower service pack. Does this work for anybody? Has
anybody encountered the problem I'm having? Note that the servers are
not clustered, if that makes any difference, and we have a custom
security realm in addition to the default file realm (though "system"
of course is in the default file realm).
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jim Doyle
[email protected]
####<Aug 8, 2002 10:25:38 AM EDT> <Emergency> <Server></server>
<chile.iso-ne.com> <webui
server> <main> <system> <> <000000> <Unable to initialize the server:
'Fatal ini
tialization exception
Throwable: java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
Start server side stack trace:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.authenticate(BootServicesImpl.java:189)
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.invoke(BootServicesImpl.java:145)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:620)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:581)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:164)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:640)
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:454)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.deliverGoodNews(PosixSocketMuxer.java:456)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:385)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:24)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
End server side stack trace

String or binary data would be truncated - different service packs on publisher vs distributor

We have transactional replication where the publisher is 10.0.4067 and the distributor is 10.0.4000. The distribution agent will periodically will fail with the following error: String
or binary data would be truncated
SQLSTATE 22001] (Error 8152). The tables on the publisher and subscriber are all the same data type. Could the version difference be causing this issue? Do we need
to upgrade the distributor sql server (different server than the publication server)?

Hello,
Just as others post above, the difference service pack version between publisher and distributor should not cause this issue.The replication workfolw between publisher and distributor is through the Log Reader Agent which
runs at the Distributor, it reads the publication transaction log in publisher and copies those transactions in batches to the distribution database at the Distributor.
You can refer to the following thread which about the similar issue casused by a long stored procedure:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/5bbf2c8c-a5c0-4a22-b30b-82b6ce4f1fea/an-error-prevents-replication-from-synchronizing-string-or-binary-data-would-be-truncated?forum=sqlreplication.
Regards,
Fanny Liu
If you have any feedback on our support, please click here.
Fanny Liu
TechNet Community Support

Tracks for different Service Packs

Hi,
We have been developing a Web Dynpro application with JDI Scenario 2+ on WAS 6.40 SP12. We recently released the product into production and decided to upgrade our JDI Server to SP15 but our other servers remain at SP12.
After the upgade to SP15 on the JDI Server, the SP15 archives were mistakenly checked-into the development track. Now when we build an SCA and attempt to deploy it to another machine that has not been upgraded to SP15 the deployment fails. Looking at the manifest in the SCA file it specifically requires SP15 versions of the SAP components.
I have tried to check-in the SP12 archives to the track but when doing so I receive the following error:
com.sap.cms.util.exception.checkin.CMSKAlreadyCheckInException: Component (Vendor/Name/Location/Counter sap.com/SAP-JEE/NIGHTLYBUILD/20050422042400) specified in the file (D:\usr\sap\JTrans\CMS\inbox\SAP-JEE_SP12.sca) is already imported into the system (Domain/Name Tst/MRCMO_D)
Any suggestions on how I can change this track back to building archives that requires SP12 instead of requiring SP15?

Hi Jason,
after changing the track have a look at the buildspace in CBS Web UI to make sure that the three compartments in the buildspace are empty. If they are empty you can try to check-in the SCA files into your track without doing a restore system state via the check-in tab in transport studio.
If the buildspace is not empty clear the compartments that were created for the three SCAs via CBS command line tool first.
If nothing else helps you can use the CBS command line tool to also upload the SCA files. The drawback is that CMS is not informed about this and probably tells you that an older or newer version is checked in. A simple way to check if the correct SCA file is checked in is by comparing the number of DCs the three SCAs contain with a track that definetly contains SP12 SCAs. This comparision can be done in CBS Web UI.
Have a look at NWDI reference guide (help.sap.com) for more details about the command line client.
Regards
Helmut

Which BEA WLS version (+ service packs) used which JDK/JRockit-JDK version

Hello,
I'm looking for an overview about the JDK and JRockit JDK versions which are used in the different BEA WLS versions.
Specialy im interested on all BEA WLS server versions (incl. the different Service Packs) starting with version 7.0.
The overview should contain the following information if possible:
- BEA WLS Version Number including SP
- Plattform (Windows, HPUX, Solaris, ...)
- JDK version
- JRockit JDK version
Here is an example (??? = I do not know currently):
WLS vers. (incl. SP)|Plattf.|JDK vers.|JRockit vers.
7.0.1 |Solaris|??? |???
8.1.5 |Windows|1.4.2_08 |rockit81sp5_142_08
9.2 MP1 |HPUX |??? |???
Thanks a million if somebody could provide me those information. :-x
Cheers,
Markus Jessl

Please check :
http://edocs.bea.com/platform/suppconfigs/index.html
Jin

Difference between Service Pack 5 for CR-XI (R2) and BOE-XI (R2)

Difference between "Service Pack 5" for CR-XI (R2) and BOE-XI (R2)
========
There are two different "Service Pack 5" files available for download...
CRYSTAL REPORTS XI (R2) = crxir2win_sp5.exe
BUSINESS OBJECTS ENTERPRISE XI (R2) = boxir2win_sp5.exe
If we have workstations that have both CRYSTAL REPORTS XI and the BUSINESS OBJECTS ENTERPRISE "Client Tools" installed locally on them do I need to run both versions of the "Service Pack 5" - or will running just one (1) of them update all the installed desktop tools...?
Thanks in advance!

I think the CR patch has client issues only.
The enterrpsie one is sufficient in most cases. Is that CR XIR1 or CR XIR2 client you have installed? Make sure it's CR XIR2 or you could run into issues
Regards,
Tim

Is there a difference between the different windows xp service packs??

At the moment I am trying to buy windows xp to put on my mac. I was told i need windows xp service pack 2. I was wondering do you just buy windows xp service pack 2 or do you buy windows xp and update the service pack over the internet??

System Builder is fine, XP SP3 is current
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Professional-32-bit-Builders/dp/B0018RCA D4/
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Professional-32-bit-Builders/dp/B0018RCA D4/
Retail with SP2
http://www.amazon.com/Microsoft-Windows-Home-FULL-VERSION/dp/B00022PTRU/

Microsoft Service Pack 2 - not all versions are equal; how to update to the latest one "safe

I posted this under another topic where it was relevant, but thought the instructions I got from Microsoft were useful (as was my experience in using them as I sent back a reply to them with the problems I encountered [none of which were particularly bad]):
One important point to note is that not all Windows XP SP2 upgrades are equal.
I had a different issue and spoke to Microsoft, who advised me to uninstall the version of SP2 I had and reinstall the newest version (the old version was about 70mb, the new one nearly 250mb).
Apparently the old SP2 had quite a few problems with it; I've found the new one to be "simply stress free" since installing...
The SP2 file name I installed (ie the newest at the time I did it) was "windowsxp-kb835935-sp2-enu".
Here's their instructions - I disagree with the way round that they suggested downloading the update (ie I would strongly advise downloading the update and having it sitting on your desktop before doing anything!!! - please see my feedback email to them that follows (you will note that I had problems connecting to the internet after uninstalling the earlier version; this, combined with the fact that I could barely read what was on the screen would have given me a major inconvenience had I not done this)!!! (and don't blame me if it goes horribly wrong - it's also worth double-checking that the version of SP2 the email links to is the most up to date. I've had a quick check myself, and it does indeed appear to still be the most up to date):
MICROSOFT'S EMAIL (make sure you also read my reply below):
MESSAGE:****************************************** ****************************This is an email from Microsoft about your support incident.When replying to this address: + It helps us if you do not include the original message + Please keep the case number (SRxxxx) in the subject lineThank youMicrosoft Product Support Services ******************* The message from Microsoft follows ****************Hi Gregory,Firstly uninstall SP2 by going to Start>Control Panel>Add/Remove Programs and then reinstall it in a clean boot.. Click Start >> Run >> In the run dialog box type msconfig and then click ok 2. Put a dot in selecti've startup 3. Uncheck all of the check boxes that become available except Process System.ini file and Load system services 4. Go to the Services tab along the top, click Hide all Microsoft Services 5. Then disable any remaining services 6. Click apply and then close 7. Finally select yes, this will start in a clean boot. 8. Then go to (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en) and download and install Service Pack 29. To return your PC to normal, open the System Configuration Utility, click "Normal Startup", click OK and restart. Then restart your computer and try accessing updates againPlease let me know the results of these methods, particularly if there were any steps that you were unable to complete successfully.
MY REPLY:
HiI successfully carried out the installation on Saturday.A few minor problems ensued (the second one may have cause a novice user real problems! Certainly caused me some concern whilst working through it!). I had to reinstall ATI drivers from scratch (for Radeon 9800 Pro); this was however the only set of drivers that appeared to "detach" itself. The main problem here was that instead of using the usual standard VGA driver (which it does when I uninstall it once a month to install updated drivers), it used some other driver that made the screen very difficult to see (especially on blue backgrounds!). Running ATI's total uninstall program sorted this out however, and fortunately I had the last update package from ATI still on my system. After uninstalling and reinstalling there appeared to be no further video problems.2. After installing SP2 (and before installing above), whilst I was in the process of getting everything up and running (eg installing the security updates) the system randomly froze about 4 or 5 times; the only way to sort this out was to use the power button. I traced this problem to Windows changing my wireless networking settings so that it handled everything; I have a Netgear adaptor the software for which usually controls this (Netgear Smart Wizard). Basically the two were trying to do the same task and causing crashes; on switching Windows management off, things settled down (the Netgear driver did not need to be reinstalled).3. As a minor point, after the upgrade and installing all other updates, I noted that Microsoft Update was no longer running; I had to reinstall it from Windows Update and the messages I got whilst installing suggested that it was still partially installed but that there were problems with it. It now works.4. As a final minor point, I attach the Scan log from Registry Mechanic which I ran after everything was up and running; it fixed various problems within the registry. I note that the majority of errors are inconsequential, but note that a few do relate to the various Microsoft installs; maybe the installer program for SP2/ Media Player 0 need to sort these out in future releases? Don't think they're a real problem though!The instructions supplied worked fine; one thing I would suggest is that users are instructed to download the SP2 upgrade pack to their desktop prior to uninstalling the original SP2; I believe that my internet connection problems started after I had uninstalled the original SP2 which may have caused problems downloading the new SP2. It also ensures that the download is successful (eg if the site was down for maintenance); I was advised whilst uninstalling SP2 that about 20 programs/drivers would not work properly after the uninstall and so the immediate reinstall was vital!One thing that seemed to fix after reinstalling was a problem I was having installing Media Player 0; after installing it previously, every time I checked for updates on it the whole program would reinstall. Now however this has fixed. I will let you know if I encounter any further problems, but things all seem to be fine now, touch wood.....!
Hope this helps!Message Edited by gjc26 on 0-27-2006 02:50 AM

One small thing - I believe the reason why some of my drivers were messing up was because they were SP2 specific; the older drivers and the ones that were compatible with both SP and 2 were fine.
As soon as I did the reinstall, all of the drivers/programs that were not working, worked (aside from the ones that I mentioned in my attached email above).
So, if after uninstalling the old SP2 you are told that loads of drivers/programs will not work, fear not - most should fix themselves upon installing the new SP2.
G

Tried to download itunes and now my iphone does not even work.I have been on the phone with apple for 3 hours and it still won't work.I have a service pack 2 in this land computer and it won't upgrade .I do have the latest verision of itunes.Then we put

I tried to download itunes to my phone.First it wanted it to download the new itunes.We also updated our Windows xp.I kept coming up can't complete because there was an error when setting up.One time is was error 9 and they tried to help me.I have a laptop with the internet and we tried it there.We were able to get service pack 3 downloaded.So we did upgrade the itunes on the laptop even though I have never put music on there but there is some from someone .I never heard of many of the songs.Any how I did try to download and restore on the laptop and then come to the land computer and see if the box comes up to restore the contacts.Well it didn 't work and now my phone won't even turn on .I have no one to call if something happened to me.I am going to the Apple store right off the bat tomorrow morning.I have everything in the box and the phone and reciept and see if they make it work or give me another one.I have to take my sim card again since They gave it back to me.I bet it means I can't sync the photos in the phone.Even with 2 computers and talking with 3 people it still did not work.All because I wanted to download the itunes to my phone.I don't care now if I can just get my phone to work and my contacts are in there.I hope I don't have to buy the ringtones again I bought 4 of them.Any one have this problem and what did you do to fix it?

The Apple rep tried both those ideas and both failed. The rep was connected to my computer so she
could see my screen and show me exactly what to do. My iPhone (not ipad) never has synced photos to my computer,
I have to use explorer to copy and paste or cut and paste them to my PC . It is the syncing back to my iPhone of only the much smaller selected photos that used to sync in itunes but now the itunes sync button cannot be clicked to make that happen. And the reason I only sync back selected photos is that my total PC pictures file is about 40 Gb. Also I find it a lot more useful to have a small number of folders ( no sub-folders of course) so I can quickly locate on my iPhone pictures from different categories such as family, autos, etc. None of this posed any problems for over a year until just recently. I am reading on other threads of many people with other iTunes syncing problems, and wonder now if it is the latest iTunes updates that are causing the problems? While I have tried removing and reinstalling iTunes on my PC, I don't know how or if you can, install a previous version?

Service Pack 3 appears to have broken the Report Builder click once installation

We are running SQL Server reporting services on SQL Server 2008 R2. Recently we installed the service pack 3 and we now get the following error when a user clicks the Report Builder link:
Application validation did not succeed. Unable to continue.
And from the Log:
ERROR DETAILS
Following errors were detected during this operation.
* [10/14/2014 9:04:32 AM] System.Deployment.Application.InvalidDeploymentException (HashValidation)
  - File, Microsoft.ReportingServices.ComponentLibrary.Controls.dll, has a different computed hash than specified in manifest.
  - Source: System.Deployment
  - Stack trace:
   at System.Deployment.Application.ComponentVerifier.VerifyFileHash(String filePath, Hash hash)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ComponentVerifier.VerifyFileHash(String filePath, HashCollection hashCollection)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ComponentVerifier.VerifyComponents()
   at System.Deployment.Application.DownloadManager.DownloadDependencies(SubscriptionState subState, AssemblyManifest deployManifest, AssemblyManifest appManifest, Uri sourceUriBase, String targetDirectory, String group, IDownloadNotification
notification, DownloadOptions options)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.DownloadApplication(SubscriptionState subState, ActivationDescription actDesc, Int64 transactionId, TempDirectory& downloadTemp)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.InstallApplication(SubscriptionState& subState, ActivationDescription actDesc)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.PerformDeploymentActivation(Uri activationUri, Boolean isShortcut, String textualSubId, String deploymentProviderUrlFromExtension, BrowserSettings browserSettings, String& errorPageUrl)
   at System.Deployment.Application.ApplicationActivator.ActivateDeploymentWorker(Object state)
I'm at a bit of a loss of what to do since all recommended solutions I've found are for installing the latest service pack or cumulative update (from threads several years old). By installing service pack 3 we are at the latest upgrade path for 2008
R2 and ironically enough, this is what appears to have broken the click once installer.

Hi Matt,
This is an known issue in SSRS 2008 R2 SP3. For this issue, Microsoft has published an article addressing this issue. It is not planning to release a fix for this defect. But there's workarounds for this issue. Please refer to the link below:
Report Builder of SQL Server 2008 R2 Service Pack 3 does not launch.
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

I have an HP-Pavilion Vista PC with MS Office 2007 and Service Pack 2. Each time I try to save a Wo

I have an HP-Pavilion Vista PC with MS Office 2007 and Service Pack 2. Each time I try to save a Word or Excel document I get the “Not Responding” message. The “Word is saving……” bar at the bottom does not show any progress. On clicking the document I get a faded version even when in Safe Mode. Somehow the document appears on the Desktop where I tried to save it. On trying to open the saved document, even as administrator, I get the following ”File in Use” message:
“The ….docx is locked for editing by….” and I am asked three questions including:
“Do you want to open a Read Only copy” yet on clicking “Yes” I am able to edit the same document.
On trying to save to a different location I get the message:
“Your autocorrect file MSO 1033.ad could not be saved. The file may be read only or you may not have permission to modify this file.”
The same message stating FILE12\1033\MSO.ACL MSO 1033ad recurs with new Excel documents.
How can I correct this problem?
PS
Worse still, the HP Advisor icon that appears on startup does not load successfully while showing the message: “Access to the path Hewlett-Packard\HD Advisor is denied”.
What can I do about it?
ZDK

I'm having the same issue, allowing guest access on the share did change the logs I'm getting in Samba. Earlier on it was giving errors on the inability of guest access to the share.
============================================================
[2008/01/29 13:05:47, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.5/samba/source/lib/fault.c:fault_report(37)
INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 4204 (3.0.10)
Please read the appendix Bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection
[2008/01/29 13:05:47, 0] /SourceCache/samba/samba-100.5/samba/source/lib/fault.c:fault_report(39)
============================================================
I also noticed that the temporary file that is created by office is not removed after the attempt to safe the file. (something like: ~$filename).

G580 wireless device not recognized in windows Xp service pack 3

Hi i bought a new laptop last week, g580 and the serial no is **********. I have installed windows xp service pack 3 and the laptop cannot detect the wlan device when i check in the hardware/device manager/network adapter , i also get a message when i turnon my laptop from the wlan adapter that the drivers are missing. I have downloaded the wireless drivers from the lenovo support website i.e. WLAN (Liteon, Cybertan) and when i am trying to install the drivers a error pops up saying "BCM4313 : cannot find setup file". So please guide me to resolve this issue, i also installed wimax but it says the wimax device is not found.
Moderator note: serial number removed for member's protection.

Hi vijeth,
thanks for posting and welcome to the community,
Based from your post here this does seem to be a driver issues impacting your Broadcom wireless card that has been fitted into your machine. This Error code is actually wide spread across different Manufacturers that has the Broadcom wireless installed. At this point it is uncertain what the exact solution is. Some have rectified the issue by doing a windows update and it had installed the broadcom drivers and that had solved the issue.
Currently there are some solutions that has help some of the users. Especially from the thread below.
http://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-3000-and-Essential/G580-Limited-access-Wireless-problem/td-p/9155...
You may want to check this out. Some of the user are experiencing this Win 7 or Win8. But it worth checking what they did as it might help you out as well.
regards

SLD on different service pack

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for