Tracks for different Service Packs

Hi,
We have been developing a Web Dynpro application with JDI Scenario 2+ on WAS 6.40 SP12. We recently released the product into production and decided to upgrade our JDI Server to SP15 but our other servers remain at SP12.
After the upgade to SP15 on the JDI Server, the SP15 archives were mistakenly checked-into the development track. Now when we build an SCA and attempt to deploy it to another machine that has not been upgraded to SP15 the deployment fails. Looking at the manifest in the SCA file it specifically requires SP15 versions of the SAP components.
I have tried to check-in the SP12 archives to the track but when doing so I receive the following error:
com.sap.cms.util.exception.checkin.CMSKAlreadyCheckInException: Component (Vendor/Name/Location/Counter sap.com/SAP-JEE/NIGHTLYBUILD/20050422042400) specified in the file (D:\usr\sap\JTrans\CMS\inbox\SAP-JEE_SP12.sca) is already imported into the system (Domain/Name Tst/MRCMO_D)
Any suggestions on how I can change this track back to building archives that requires SP12 instead of requiring SP15?

Hi Jason,
after changing the track have a look at the buildspace in CBS Web UI to make sure that the three compartments in the buildspace are empty. If they are empty you can try to check-in the SCA files into your track without doing a restore system state via the check-in tab in transport studio.
If the buildspace is not empty clear the compartments that were created for the three SCAs via CBS command line tool first.
If nothing else helps you can use the CBS command line tool to also upload the SCA files. The drawback is that CMS is not informed about this and probably tells you that an older or newer version is checked in. A simple way to check if the correct SCA file is checked in is by comparing the number of DCs the three SCAs contain with a track that definetly contains SP12 SCAs. This comparision can be done in CBS Web UI.
Have a look at NWDI reference guide (help.sap.com) for more details about the command line client.
Regards
Helmut

Similar Messages

Installing different service packs into one server

Hi,
I was just wondering is there any way in which i can incorporate different service packs into one server?Any clue with regards to this is appreciated.
Thanks

Hi
The basic concept of applying SPs in Java is to add the new functionality and remove the gaps which were in previous releases. And always when we are using the Java instance the current SP is recognised. Before the deployment of a software component, the SDM server performs additional version checks. Only new software components that have a higher counter than the counter of the old software components can be deployed.
When we apply the SP in Java, following things are checked:
The vendors and the names of the SCAs are the same as the ones of the software components that are installed on the system.
The releases of the SCAs are the same as the ones of the software components that are installed on the system. JSPM allows updates only within one release.
The support package levels of the SCAs are higher than or equal to the ones of the software components that are installed on the system.
If the support package levels of the SCAs are equal to the ones of the software components that are installed on the system, the patch levels of the SCAs are higher.
Checks for modified software components
If the provider of an SCA is different from the original provider, SAP AG, of the software component that is installed on the system, this SCA has been modified using the NWDI.
Checks on foreign software components
The JSPM checks if, after the deployment of a software component, the dependencies on other software components are fulfilled.
Please check this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/1f/c45b4211aac353e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm

Is it possible to have different service pack between Exchange servers.

Is it possible to have CAS Exchange 2007 running service Pack 1 and Mailbox server 2007 running SP2? In my env I need to have SP1 running on CAS server for some applications but also need to install SP2 for migration. Application cannot be upgraded so
I am thinking to keep one CAS running SP1 and upgrade other Exchange 2007 servers to SP2. Please suggest.

Hi,
It is recommended to have the same service pack level on all Exchange 2007 servers, different service pack level may have potential effects.
Here is a related thread for your reference.
Exchange servers with different Service pack levels
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/88e22daf-7ccb-49c3-97d8-f339336476da/exchange-servers-with-different-service-pack-levels?forum=exchangesvrdeploylegacy
Hope this helps.
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

Different service packs

Hello,
could someone help me with the different service packs available in XI

Krishnan,
Check this thread where you will find all the service pack release notes:
Release notes for nw2004-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/43/d00cb4a7073ab3e10000000a422035/frameset.htm
Release notes for nw2004S-
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/57/a21f407b402402e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Regards,
---Satish

Error Using the SQL Server 2000 Driver for JDBC Service Pack 3

Hi,
I�m using the SQL Server 2000 Driver for JDBC Service Pack 3. The connection is succesfully, but when I use de statement.executequery() method, there is the follow exception:
java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Invalid object name 'PEC_COUNTRY'.
This is my code:
ResultSet resultSet;
Statement statement;
Connection connection;
Class.forName("com.microsoft.jdbc.sqlserver.SQLServerDriver").newInstance();
connection = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://S0MALMUERTA:1433;user=sa;password=");
statement = connection.createStatement();
resultSet = statement.executeQuery("SELECT COY_INX, COY_NAME, COY_ICO FROM PEC_COUNTRY
");When I make the last instruction, occurs the above exception
Thanks in advance
Luija

The way you are connecting, the default database used will be 'master' and i guess that the table PEC_COUNTRY was defined in another database.
If it is the case you need to specify the database name.
connection = DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:microsoft:sqlserver://S0MALMUERTA:1433;DatabaseName=yourdb;user=sa;password=");

SLD on different service pack

Hi,
Our XI system is being upgraded to SP16 in a short while. Now, we have a DEV system, a Quality Assurance system, and a Production system. Our SLD is installed on the DEV system and functions as a central SLD, so QA and PRD use the same SLD.
My question is: Is it possible to have the SLD on a different service pack than Production? We want to implement SP16 on DEV first (which includes the SLD) and then QA and finally Prod, but there is going to be a gap of one to two weeks. Will the production system (which is on SP12) still function correctly, or do we have to upgrade the service pack on all systems at once?
Thanks in advance!
Yordy

Hi Yordy,
Theoretically, the SLD can have a different SP (as long as it is equal or highr, it is okay). What needs to be the same is the CIM model version.
Cheers
Manish

Audigy 4 asking for XP Service Pack 2 CD, no such th

When installing Audigy 4, the software asks to put in the Windows XP Service Pack 2 CD. Of course there is no such CD as this PC came with Service Pack and was on line updated to Service Pack 2. The installation won't complete and continues to reinstall.
The actual message is "Some files on Windows XP Professional Service pack 2 CD are needed". This is very disappointing.

freesky wrote:
Here's the direct download for the Windows XP Service Pack 2 from microsoft. Just to make sure you have it installed, download it and install it.Windows XP Service Pack 2 Network Installation Package for IT Professionals and Developershttp://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...DisplayLang=en
I'm I'm failing to communicate here... I DO have it already installed. So, if it is already installed on my HD, why does the Creative CD prompt me for the service pack CD ???

SAP for Professional Services pack

Hi Guru's,
Please provide me the information on the following
1)      Can we install SAP for Professional Services pack on a running ECC 6 system?
2)      What is the Impact on existing ECC 6 on this installation?
3)      What are the perquisites for Installing SAP for Professional Services?
4)      Integration with Microsoft EPM server possible? To which extent?
5)      Is SAP for Professional Services is available in any SAP Enhancement Package for ECC 6?
Regards,
Ravi Duggirala

Hi Ravi the following are my answers to your points:
1) Can we install SAP for Professional Services pack on a running ECC 6 system?
Yes
2) What is the Impact on existing ECC 6 on this installation?
No impact on the existing set up. We have to add cProjects suite with ECC 6.0.
3) What are the perquisites for Installing SAP for Professional Services?
If you are looking for full IS-Professional Services then you need CRM, ECC, cProjects and BW. If your organization is into NPD and if you have critical mass in resources then you can go for xRPM also.
4) Integration with Microsoft EPM server possible? To which extent?
I don't know exactly what is EPM?
5) Is SAP for Professional Services is available in any SAP Enhancement Package for ECC 6?
ECC 6.0 service pack 11 will have some part of modules specified above. But CRM and BW are seperate modules, which needs to be installed seperately.
You can award points if at all this info helps you.
Apart from can you eloborate on your requirement. I can help you if at all you are interested.
Regards
Suresh. J

Using several UMTS access points (APN) for different services

Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to use several UMTS access points (APN) for different services.
situation:
1) The iPhone is used for business AND private purposes.
2) The company's mobile telephone contract includes a APN, which is only usable by the employees' mobile phones.
problem / question:
Is it possible to define two access points in the iPhone, that for example the exchange account uses the company's APN, while all the other apps use the standard APN of the carrier?
Problem is, that some iPhone's benefits like Push-Messages are blocked by the carrier's APN. Now, I have to switch the access point by installing the appropriate profile every time I want to check my e-mails or vice versa for using "normal" apps.
I hope you can hep me.
Greets from Germany
Mitch

Thanks for your help! This really helps a lot! We actually only want to replace the autonmous access point with the controller solution and make one WLAN available at another site. From what I can see, this is possible with our current solution - we just need to switch from Layer 2 to Layer 3 and purchase the corresponding amount of supported Access Points (I think we should be able to get some refurbished ones).
Am I correct in assuming that the Access Points we want to replace (AIR-AP1230B-E-K9 with 802.11b radio only) cannot be upgraded to lightweight ones? Since if I understood document http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/access_point/conversion/lwapp/upgrade/guide/lwapnote.html correctly, this is not possible with access points that only have 802.11b radios.
Regarding the switch from Layer 2 to Layer 3: Do we really only need to perform the steps I described in my first post?
And one last question regarding REAP. As far as I understood this is only needed when local traffic needs to be maintained in case the connection to the WLC becomes unavailable. So we really don't need it if we want to access resources that are only available over the WLC?
Thanks again for your help!
Michael

Different service packs in admin server and managed server

Hi,
Has anybody successfully used a WebLogic 6.1 SP1 managed server that
connects to a WebLogic 6.1 SP 2 admin server?
BEA's docs claim:
"The Administration Server must be running the same version of
WebLogic Server as the Managed Servers in its domain. The
Administration Server must also have the same or later service pack
installed as the Managed Servers in its domain. For example, the
Administration Server could be running version 6.1, Service Pack 2
while the Managed Servers are running version 6.1, Service Pack 1."
This is precisely what we want to do, but it's not working. In this
case, we need to run the admin server and managed server on the same
machine, but we need the managed server to run SP 1 to work around a
bug in SP 2. So to our initial installation of WebLogic 6.1 SP 2,
where I run the admin server, I added a second installation, this time
WebLogic 6.1 SP 1, with a different BEA_HOME. When I start the
managed server from this second installation, I can see from the logs
that it is starting up correctly as 6.1 SP 1. But then it fails with
a ClassCastException when connecting to the admin server (I have
included the stack trace below). This seems typical of version
compatibility problems I've had when I've tried connecting to a server
with a client of a different version.
But in this case, you are supposed to be able to have the managed
server with a lower service pack. Does this work for anybody? Has
anybody encountered the problem I'm having? Note that the servers are
not clustered, if that makes any difference, and we have a custom
security realm in addition to the default file realm (though "system"
of course is in the default file realm).
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jim Doyle
[email protected]
####<Aug 8, 2002 10:25:38 AM EDT> <Emergency> <Server></server>
<chile.iso-ne.com> <webui
server> <main> <system> <> <000000> <Unable to initialize the server:
'Fatal ini
tialization exception
Throwable: java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
Start server side stack trace:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.authenticate(BootServicesImpl.java:189)
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.invoke(BootServicesImpl.java:145)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:620)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:581)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:164)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:640)
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:454)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.deliverGoodNews(PosixSocketMuxer.java:456)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:385)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:24)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
End server side stack trace

Hi,
Has anybody successfully used a WebLogic 6.1 SP1 managed server that
connects to a WebLogic 6.1 SP 2 admin server?
BEA's docs claim:
"The Administration Server must be running the same version of
WebLogic Server as the Managed Servers in its domain. The
Administration Server must also have the same or later service pack
installed as the Managed Servers in its domain. For example, the
Administration Server could be running version 6.1, Service Pack 2
while the Managed Servers are running version 6.1, Service Pack 1."
This is precisely what we want to do, but it's not working. In this
case, we need to run the admin server and managed server on the same
machine, but we need the managed server to run SP 1 to work around a
bug in SP 2. So to our initial installation of WebLogic 6.1 SP 2,
where I run the admin server, I added a second installation, this time
WebLogic 6.1 SP 1, with a different BEA_HOME. When I start the
managed server from this second installation, I can see from the logs
that it is starting up correctly as 6.1 SP 1. But then it fails with
a ClassCastException when connecting to the admin server (I have
included the stack trace below). This seems typical of version
compatibility problems I've had when I've tried connecting to a server
with a client of a different version.
But in this case, you are supposed to be able to have the managed
server with a lower service pack. Does this work for anybody? Has
anybody encountered the problem I'm having? Note that the servers are
not clustered, if that makes any difference, and we have a custom
security realm in addition to the default file realm (though "system"
of course is in the default file realm).
Thanks in advance for any help,
Jim Doyle
[email protected]
####<Aug 8, 2002 10:25:38 AM EDT> <Emergency> <Server></server>
<chile.iso-ne.com> <webui
server> <main> <system> <> <000000> <Unable to initialize the server:
'Fatal ini
tialization exception
Throwable: java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
Start server side stack trace:
java.lang.ClassCastException:
weblogic.security.acl.DefaultUserInfoImpl
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.authenticate(BootServicesImpl.java:189)
at weblogic.kernel.BootServicesImpl.invoke(BootServicesImpl.java:145)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatchRequest(RJVMImpl.java:620)
at weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl.dispatch(RJVMImpl.java:581)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManagerServer.handleRJVM(ConnectionManagerServer.java:164)
at weblogic.rjvm.ConnectionManager.dispatch(ConnectionManager.java:640)
at weblogic.rjvm.t3.T3JVMConnection.dispatch(T3JVMConnection.java:454)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.deliverGoodNews(PosixSocketMuxer.java:456)
at weblogic.socket.PosixSocketMuxer.processSockets(PosixSocketMuxer.java:385)
at weblogic.socket.SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:24)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:139)
at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
End server side stack trace

Prerequisites for OS service pack upgrade from SAP end.

Hi All,
I Have AIX 5.3 OS at TL 08 and Service pack 1 level JS 23 and JS12 blades.
IBM wants to upgrade it to TL 8 SP7 as the IBM centre supports TL8 SP7 for AIX 5.3 JS23 Blade.
So we are planning to go ahead with SP enhancement to SP7 from SP1. Are there any pre-requisites from SAP end for upgrading the same.
Regards,
Priya

Check
Note 1119631 - Using SAP systems with AIX 5.3
for possible problem/issues with different TLs.
Also check with your database vendor if the target level is supported.
Markus

ISE Posture Condition for Windows Service Pack and Remediation

Hi,
We having ISE ver 1.1.1 and currently on PoC. I have the following points to be clarified for Posture and Remediation.
1) How to configure a condition to check Windows Service pack (may be more than 1 Windows favor such as XP, Win 7 and Win 8) and how to remediate in case client is not complying with Windows requirement.
2) I configure AV condition and looks its working fine, however I still couldnt find the place to how to remediate in case client is not having proper verion and AV definition on his PC.
3) We have a Authorization profile configured with dACL"Posture Remediation" where we allowing AV server update url and also matching ACL configured on switch "Posture Redirect", wants to know the exact purpose on these two ACLs.
4) where can we see the logs of none-complaints logs and find out the reason for non-complaints
appreciate if someone can please give us a proper document to achive the above task or send me any working senario configuration steps.
thanks in advance.

1. Windows Server Update Services (WSUS) remediation remediates Windows clients from a locally managed WSUS server, or Microsoft-managed WSUS server with the latest Windows service packs, hotfixes, and patches (WSUS updates) for compliance. You can create a WSUS remediation where a NAC Agent integrates with the local WSUS Agent to check whether the endpoint is up-to-date for WSUS updates. You can also duplicate, edit or delete WSUS remediations from the remediations list.
You can configure Windows clients to receive the latest WSUS updates from a Microsoft-managed WSUS server, or locally administered WSUS server for compliance.
The Windows server update services (WSUS) remediations list page displays all the WSUS remediations along with their names, description, and as well as their modes of remediation
check the following link for configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_pos_pol.html#wp1554782
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_pos_pol.html#wp1554884
2.for AV/AS Remidiaton configuration check this link http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_pos_pol.html#wp1657420

Any workarounds for xp service pack 1?

I own windows XP service pack 1. Does anyone know of a way to use this with Bootcamp/Leopard on my Mac Pro? I also own a Vista upgrade set and that wont work either. Errrr!
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks!

Welcome to Apple Discussions.
No, you cannot use Windows XP SP1 under Boot Camp. However, there is a way to create a Windows XP SP2 CD from the files on your Windows XP SP1 CD and the full Windows XP SP2 update (downloadable from Microsoft). This process is called slipstreaming and should be done on a PC.
http://www.helpwithwindows.com/WindowsXP/winxp-sp2-bootcd.html
You can also use a program called nLite which handles the slipstreaming for you. All you have to do is to copy the files on your Windows XP SP1 CD onto a folder on your PC and download the SP2 update from Microsoft. Then launch nLite and choose to integrate the SP2 file. I repeat, these must be done on a PC.
You can also install the Vista upgrade using Boot Camp. The trick is to not enter your product key when you first install Vista. Then after the Vista (trial) is installed launch the Vista setup program again under Vista and choose to upgrade Vista.

Sequence for Updates (Service Pack / Fix Pack)

Hello everybody.
I'm a bit confused about the update strategy.
Until now I was convinced that the strategy for the updates is or should be like this:
Service Pack 1 --> Fix Pack 1.1 --> Fix Pack 1.2 --> ... --> Fix Pack 1.x
Service Pack 2 --> Fix Pack 2.1 --> Fix Pack 2.2 --> ... --> Fix Pack 2.x
Service Pack 3 --> Fix Pack 3.1 ...
and so on, and so on.
There shouldn't be possible to install, e.g a Fix Pack 2.1 after the Service Pack 3 is installed.
But because of an problem with the connection server under Windows 2003 I'm not that sure anymore.
The story in short:
We've got installed the Service Pack 4 on the Enterprise.
After a few Windows updates the connection server didn't start anymore.
In the forum some say that this issue is fixed with the Fix Pack 3.6.
So first I wondered why the issue occurs on a system with a higher patch.
But the I've seen in the SAP Service Marketplace that the Fix Pack 3.6 is released after the Service Pack 4. Does this mean it is "more up to date"?
Is my image of the update sequence incorrect?
Thanks for any explanation in advance.
Regards
PS: My connection service problem was solved by uninstalling the windows update KB2509553 and a restart of the system.

Hi,
the explanation of this is the following:
At some point they start with the development of SP4. Lets say they start the dev. of SP4 during the release SP3 FP3.5. So all fixes after FP3.5 wont get packed into SP4. Thats why FP3.6 will fix a bug which SP4 wont. With the release of FP4.1 this fix from FP3.6 will be packaged aswell into FP4.1
I hope this made it clear.
Regards
-Seb.

Are admin and office clients always updated for each service pack.

Hi,
I am investigating upgrading our BPC version from 7.0 SP3. The question I have been asked by my business clients is "do the admin and office clients of BPC always get updated with each service pack?" I assume they do because the install guide indicates that you must update them to the same version as the server. Upgrading the client versions is always a concern here because since we don't allow the automatic update our plans have to include packaging an SMS deployment to over 500 workstations of several different configurations and locations.

Hi,
Yes, there are changes in the clients in every service pack. This is why it's important that the version of the client matches the version on the server. We've seen issues where there was a mismatch and no one could log in because of the changes in the client.
I would advise always updating the clients when adding a new service pack.
Regards,
Jason

Tracks for different Service Packs

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for