Slow performance Designer 10g (on 10gR2 database)
We are busy testing Designer 10g version 10.1.2.5 (windows XP) on 10gR2 64 bit database (Sun solaris) . The repository was migrated from Designer 6.0.
But the performance/response is rather slow. Example: At first, opening a server model diagram took 2 minutes or more. By searching the forum we found the tip for the "alter system set OPTIMIZER_SECURE_VIEW_MERGING = false;". That made a big difference.
But now we still have response problems: Expanding the treeview for the list of tables, views or snapshots takes much longer then in Designer 6.0.
Also opening for example Design Editor takes longer then one normally expects, allthough some delay can be expected because we have a lot of applications (100) in the repository.
Is it because it is now written in Java, or are more database optimizations possible?
Paul.
Have you computed statistics using the Repository Administration Utility (RAU)? The default percentage of 20% is usually good enough, but you could go higher.
Do a View Objects in RAU and check for missing, disabled or invalid objects. If you find any, there are ways to correct the situation, mostly under the Recreate button.
Make sure that no-one else is using the repository, then press the Recreate button in RAU and use the selection labeled: Truncate Temporary Tables. Sometimes these tables get too full and can impact performance.
Under the Options menu in RAU, there is an item labeled: Enable Performance Enhancements. To be honest with you, I've never noticed this item before, and I don't know for sure what it does. Then again, I've never had any serious performance problems in Designer. It might be worth your while to back up your repository, then turn this on.
Similar Messages
-
Slow Performance Forms 10g !!!!
Hi,
I have migrated several forms from 6i to 10g and i use a 11g Database.
Most of the users accessing from different countries complain of slow performance but the basic idea of migration is to get a better performance. My users mostly work on laptops.
I am unable to find where the problem is. Is this might be due to network traffic since they are accessing via internet or any server related issues. Please help me to find and fix the problem and is there any tips for gaining better performance in using forms 10g.
Regards,
SureshSo, were they running on 6i via laptop and accessing via the internet before you migrated ? (ie: was it 6i client server or 6i web forms)
Did you migrate the database too ?
Slow performance as in : it used to be seconds and now it's taking minutes ?
Steve -
Latest releases of Designer 10g and 10gR2 now available on OTN
The latest maintenance releases of Designer 10g (9.0.4.7) and Designer 10gR2 (10.1.2.2) have been available for download on Metalink for some time now. These releases were recently made available for download from OTN. In addition, the latest release notes, installation guide, bug fixes for Designer and SCM, and error messages are now also available online. Links to the downloads and these documents are available from the Designer home page on OTN: http://otn.oracle.com/products/designer/index.html
Suresh Ramaswamy
Designer DevelopmentYes, that is correct. However, SCM is no longer being released as a standalone product. You should use Oracle Designer (which includes the Repository and all SCM functionality) instead.
- Suresh -
Slow performance after 10g upgrade
After upgrade from 9.2.0.3.0 to 10.2.0.1.0, the following query runs extremely slow, any suggestion how to adjust the DB settings without re-writing this query
SELECT SUM (ABS (ship_net_clc_amt))
FROM ship_dtl
WHERE order_section_number = '940007320686'
AND SUBSTR (misc_charge_code, 1, 2) IN ('72', '77', 'A9')
AND ics_status_flag2 IN ('W', 'S')
AND dsr_trans_date >= to_date('1/1/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
AND dsr_trans_date < to_date('1/31/2008', 'MM/DD/YYYY')
AND product_base_number NOT IN (SELECT DISTINCT sku
FROM ap_smb_sku_based
WHERE fiscal_period = '200801'
AND country = 'TAIWAN')
AND quota_product_line_code IN (SELECT pl
FROM ap_pl_bu
WHERE bu = '3C')
The exec plan for 10g (optimizer mode = ALL ROWS) is
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 49 | 7 (15)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 49 | | | | ||
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | ||
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 42 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 49 | 5 (20)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 5 | SORT UNIQUE | | 1 | 7 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ||
|* 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 1 | 7 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 | | ||
| 7 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 3 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NM | 3 | | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 | 39 | 39 ||
| 9 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 25 | 25 ||
|* 10 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 25 | 25 ||
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
The exec plan for 9i (optimizer mode=choose) for
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop ||
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 47 | 10 | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 47 | | | ||
| 2 | FILTER | | | | | | ||
| 3 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 47 | 8 | | ||
| 4 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 36 | 5 | 13 | 13 ||
| 5 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR | 9 | | 3 | 13 | 13 ||
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 2 | 22 | 2 | | ||
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 21 | 2 | 13 | 13 ||
Thanks.
Lizship_dtl has 94690531 records
ap_smb_sku_based has 19 records
ap_plbu has 19 records
The query returns a single row, because it calculates the sum. The query could be better written to get rid of IN or NOT IN which are costly. But I just wonder why the plans/performance are so different?
I used analyze to analyze other tables and it is still working fine in 10g. Now based on the plans, do you think anything wrong ?
10g -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 50 | 10 (-550| 00:00:01 | | | | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 50 | | | | | | | ||
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | | | | ||
|* 3 | PX COORDINATOR | | | | | | | | | | ||
| 4 | PX SEND QC (RANDOM) | :TQ10002 | 1 | 50 | 66 (5)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | P->S | QC (RAND) ||
|* 5 | FILTER | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | ||
| 6 | MERGE JOIN | | 1 | 50 | 66 (5)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | ||
| 7 | SORT JOIN | | 2 | 14 | 4 (50)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | ||
| 8 | BUFFER SORT | | | | | | | | Q1,02 | PCWC | ||
| 9 | PX RECEIVE | | 4 | 28 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | ||
| 10 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10000 | 4 | 28 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | S->P | HASH ||
| 11 | SORT UNIQUE | | 4 | 28 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | ||
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 4 | 28 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | | | ||
|* 13 | SORT JOIN | | 1 | 43 | 62 (2)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | ||
| 14 | PX RECEIVE | | 1 | 43 | 61 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,02 | PCWP | ||
| 15 | PX SEND HASH | :TQ10001 | 1 | 43 | 61 (0)| 00:00:01 | | | Q1,01 | P->P | HASH ||
| 16 | PX PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR | | 1 | 43 | 61 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY | Q1,01 | PCWC | ||
|* 17 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 43 | 61 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY | Q1,01 | PCWP | ||
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR | 14 | | 49 (0)| 00:00:01 | KEY | KEY | Q1,01 | PCWP | ||
| 19 | PARTITION RANGE SINGLE | | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 14 | 14 | | | ||
|* 20 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 39 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 | 14 | 14 | | | ||
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|Plan for 9i
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost | Pstart| Pstop | TQ |IN-OUT| PQ Distrib ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 53 | 74 | | | | | ||
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 53 | | | | | | ||
| 2 | FILTER | | | | | | | | | ||
| 3 | FILTER | | | | | | | | | ||
| 4 | HASH JOIN SEMI | | 1 | 53 | 72 | | | 30,01 | P->S | QC (RAND) ||
| 5 | PARTITION RANGE ITERATOR | | | | | KEY | KEY | 30,01 | PCWP | ||
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| SHIP_DTL | 1 | 42 | 54 | KEY | KEY | 30,01 | PCWP | ||
| 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IX_SHIP_DTL_ORD_SEC_NR | 21 | | 37 | KEY | KEY | 30,01 | PCWP | ||
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_PL_BU | 2 | 22 | 2 | | | 30,00 | S->P | BROADCAST ||
| 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AP_SMB_SKU_BASED | 1 | 39 | 2 | 14 | 14 | | | ||
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------| -
Slow performance for large queries
Hi -
I'm experiencing slow performance when I use a filter with a very large OR clause.
I have a list of users, whose uid's are known, and I want to retrieve attributes for all users. If I do this one at a time, I pay the network overhead, and this becomes a bottleneck. However, if I try to get information about all users at once, the query runs ridiculously slow - ~ 10minutes for 5000 users.
The syntax of my filter is: (|(uid=user1)(uid=user2)(uid=user3)(uid=user4).....(uid=user5000))
I'm trying this technique because it's similar to good design for oracle - minimizing round trips to the database.
I'm running LDAP 4.1.1 on a Tru64 OS - v5.1.This is a performance/tuning forum for iPlanet Application Server. You'd have better luck with this question on the Directory forum.
The directory folks don't have a separate forum dedicated to tuning, but they answer performance questions in the main forum all of the time.
David -
Slow performance of PreparedStatement
I am having difficulty with extremely slow performance or a relatively simply Microsoft SQL Server 2000 call from my Java applet. Most of the application runs fine, but there are certain parts that are repeatedly giving me a long delay before completing their execution. The code is as follows:
// Create the try block for the execution of the SQL code
try{
// Create the command to be executed
String command = new String( "select Description, Enabled " );
command += "from tLineInfo where( Line = ? )";
// Create the SQL text to be executed
PreparedStatement get = _connection.prepareStatement( command );
get.setInt( 1, lineNo );
// Execute the SQL command
ResultSet lineInfo = get.executeQuery();
// Display the information accordingly
if( lineInfo.next() ){
// Populate the user data fields
description.setText( lineInfo.getString( "Description" ) );
<! more display code here >
} // End of if statment
else{
// Clear the user data fields
description.setText( " " );
<! more display code here >
} // End of else statements
// Close the result set in preparation for the next query
lineInfo.close();
} // End of try block
catch( Exception e ){
// Display a dialog box informing the user of the problem
Object[] options = { " OK " };
JOptionPane.showOptionDialog( null, e.getMessage(),
"Error",
JOptionPane.OK_OPTION, JOptionPane.ERROR_MESSAGE,
null, options, options[ 0 ] );
} // End of Exception catch
// Get the related area information
populateAreaCombo( lineNo );
private void populateAreaCombo( int lineNo ){
// Format the areaComboBox
try{
// Create a command to get the devices from the database
String command = new String( "select Area, [Name], [Description] " );
command += "from tAreas where( Line = ? )";
// Create the SQL statement to grab the information, and
// populate the search parameter
PreparedStatement getAreas =
_connection.prepareStatement( command );
getAreas.setInt( 1, lineNo );
// Execute the command
ResultSet areas = getAreas.executeQuery();
// Loop through the result set, and add collect the areas
Vector< String > controlAreas = new Vector();
while( areas.next() ){
// Add the area to the comboBox
controlAreas.add( Integer.toString( areas.getInt( "Area" ) ) +
" - " + areas.getString( "Name" ) + ": " +
areas.getString( "Description" ) );
} // End of while loop
<! more display code here >
The application always seem to pause at the second PrepraredStatement call:
PreparedStatement getAreas =
_connection.prepareStatement( command );This seems to be a very simple operation, and it is not even the execution of the query where the long delay is realized. Rather, it is in the actual creation of the object prior to the execution.
The delay is very repeatable at this exact statement each time.
Additionally, of interest, is that the delay is only realized on computers remotely connected to the database. If I run this code on the localhost, then there is no delay. As soon as I distribute it, then the delay is incurred. That being said, there is not a network related issue that I can identify here. I have even isolated the server to be on the network with just one other PC, and the delay still persisted.
Does anyone have any ideas?
ThanksI can determine where the delay occurs by adding
dialog boxes at a bunch of different steps, then
monitoring them for when they appear; a little
archaic, of course, but an easy way to find this
out.You should
1. Get the start time
2. Get the current time at each step.
3. Print the results at the end.
4. Repeat a number of times to average.
>
When you say that I should not mix database code with
display code... What exactly do you mean? To be
more precise in my description, I was simply setting
a bunch of different text fields and/or check boxes,
etc., based on the result set returned. It was not
as if I was creating a portion of the GUI there or
something. I am assuming that is an allowable
practice...
You should have a class that does nothing but the database work. That class should be used by other classes (like classes that do GUI.)
I have made little effort to close my resources, and
sometimes they are not closed at all. When you say
"resources", what exactly do you mean by that? Are
you referring to the result sets, for example? I do
not know of other resources that need to be closed,
except for the connection to the DB itself. This, I
have as persistent throughout the duration of the
user's session.
You must close result sets, statements and connections. They must be closed in that order.
I am not running this code on the Internet, but it
has been designed to be run on a small corporate
network ( < 10 users). This is why I opted for the
applet to run the entire application through instead
of doing more HTML work.That is ok. -
Loosing performance in 10g against 8i
I've created database under 10g from dump
file from 8i database. I've tried some select statements
on new created database, but it was about 2x slower
much more accessing the disk than on 8i.
I increased PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET parameter
and get the performance to the level of 8i that way.
But because of PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET is value of
memory available to all server processes attached
to the instance whereas e.g. SORT_AREA_SIZE set in 8i
exists for each user process,
I tried with more sessions and the performance in
10g was lower again than in 8i. The size of
PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET parameter is now much greater
than the default value 20% of SGA. What should I do,
continue in growing that parameter, or the reason
of massive disk usage in new created 10g database
can be in something else? Thanks for advise a lot,
P.Make sure that you have updated statistics. This is very important. Also, I suggest you don't simply change parameters on the fly. First, understand where the bottleneck is. Have you enabled SQL tracing? Did you examine the trace file using TKProf? Have you looked at the V$session_wait, v$session_event views? Can you provide smoe more details on the queries that are slower and provide their TKProf output. Find the source of the problem first before making any changes.
The massive disk activity could be related to paging to disk, or performing sort operations on disk.
-Raj Suchak
[email protected] -
Hi ,
Recently we have migrated our database from 10g to 11.2.0.2 enterprise edition .
Comparing with 10g , we are getting very slow performance on 11g .
can anyone suggest me how to to tune this migrated database.
Also Please suggest me the version of TOMCAT server compatible with 11g
Thanx in advance....Start looking at your top N SQL.
Even if there are a number of statements whose performance has degraded thanks to the upgrade, you might as well start with the worst performing SQL.
If you have some performance reports from the period before upgrade then these could be used as comparison.
If you preserved any execution plans from before the upgrade, these might come in useful as quick fixes to any specific statement issues.
If you still have plans in AWR from before the upgrade, then
"Read by other session" is a typical symptom of inefficient execution plan issues where multiple query executions are requesting the same data and it is not in the cache.
"db file parallel read" is often a symptom of index prefetching - from your top SQL check statements doing an index full scan, particularly if they didn't use to.
See threads following threads for SQL tuning:
[url https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=863295]How to post a sql tuning request
[url https://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]When your query takes too long
So, in summary, check out your top N SQL, check which queries are doing most "read by other sessions", double check plans with "db file parallel read".
You might find a common cause affecting a number of statments or you might just find a couple of queries who are stressing you out and whose execution plan needs some post-upgrade TLC (which is normal). -
Question: 10gR2 database can not see the 11gR2 ASM diskgroup?
Hi there,
env:
uname -rm
2.6.18-92.1.22.el5xen x86_64
Single server(non-RAC)
note: we don't want to upgrade 10gr2 database into 11gR2 yet. But we created the 11gR2 ASM, then a 11gr2 database on ASM, and plan to migrate datafile in 10gR2 database to 11gR2 ASM
1. oracle 10gR2 installed first version: 10.2.0.3.0
2. then install 11gR2 Grid Infrastructure, and created ASM (version 11gr2)
$ sqlplus / as sysasm
SQL*Plus: Release 11.2.0.1.0 Production on Tue Oct 19 10:30:56 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2009, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
With the Automatic Storage Management option
SQL> col name form a15
SQL> col COMPATIBILITY form a15
SQL> col DATABASE_COMPATIBILITY form a15
SQL> l
1* select name , STATE, COMPATIBILITY, DATABASE_COMPATIBILITY from v$asm_diskgroup
SQL> /
NAME STATE COMPATIBILITY DATABASE_COMPAT
ORCL_DATA1 MOUNTED 11.2.0.0.0 10.1.0.0.0
ORA_DATA MOUNTED 10.1.0.0.0 10.1.0.0.0
3. in 10gR2 database
sqlplus /
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Tue Oct 19 12:12:31 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2006, Oracle. All Rights Reserved.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning and Data Mining options
SQL> select * from v$asm_diskgroup;
no rows selected
4. pin the node into css
# /u01/app/product/11.2.0/grid/bin/crsctl pin css -n mynodename
CRS-4000: Command Pin failed, or completed with errors.
Question: 10gR2 database can not see the 11gR2 ASM diskgroup?
please help
Thanks
ScottWhat is the output of
olsnodes -t -n
Also, see unix error log and ohasd error log if you find anything in that -
Slow performance of discoverer portlets
Hi,
I am running into slow performance of a particular page in portal, there are multiple sites hosted on the portal but these all have static text and are very quick to load but the one page with discoverer portlets and a web-clippping portlet is taking ages. If I run these reports on their own they are instant. Has anyone had similar problems with 9.0.2 portal and the discoverer reports ? I tried to identify a particular report that may be the culprit by deleting them one by one and to no avail. After a few hours effort I found the design mode was hanging as well. Again, just for this 1 page.
There are 3 tabs on this page with about 4 report portlets and 1 web-clipping portlet.
Thanks for any help,
BrandonThanks for the help.
Seems to have been resolved although I'm not sure if thats the end of the story. Will wait and see.....
So far apparently a port conflict of some sort in the discoverer config was causing it to hang and then also other system demands on the network and server housing the discoverer end-user layer were also causing problems.
No error messages unfortunately...... -
Portability between Designer 9i r2 and Designer 10g r2, and deployment?
I have some questions to ask...
I have been given the job of adding Oracle to the reportoire of databases available to be used for a commercial Delphi application. The idea is to create a database in 10g that this application can talk to.
I wish to develop the database, constraints and triggers etc using Oracle Designer (not because I think it's best, but simply I know how to use it, and don't know JDeveloper yet, and time is of the essence).
Here's where the problem lies: The last application I developed was on 9i r2 and was going to a 9i r2 platform, and I generated DDL for the database tables stuff, and also for the table API, ending up with two sets of script files to run on the target system. Two of the lines of code in the table API script were:
@ C:\oracle\9iDSHome\cgens72\sql\cdsaper.PKS
@ C:\oracle\9iDSHome\cgens72\sql\cdsaper.PKB
Of course the pathnames weren't right, but when I fixed them I managed to get the system installed correctly. However the clients for the application I am working on now should not have to have developer installed... I want them to be able to just run the script files into a 10g database and not worry about designer/developer at all.
The other issue is just as serious. Although clients shouldn't have to have designer installed, I want the application developer/company owner to be able to fiddle with the designer if he wants to. I have 9i where I work, and he will have 10g. Will I be able to do a repository export/dump from my 9i r2 and import it to his 10g r2? With the previous project I did, I couldn't even import the designer export from my 9i r2 to the 9i r2 at the workplace... it said "Incorrect header file" - it was lucky I had the DDL script files or I would never have got it in the database at all! If they had had a different version of oracle then I don't know what would have happened when trying to run those package files from developer (the comments say something about an error package or some such)!
Eventually I'm going to upgrade to 10g for database development but I don't want to just yet.
So my questions are:
1. Can I develop the system using 9i r2 DB and 9i r2 DS and then create DDL scripts to be run on 10g client databases without having to have developer installed on the client machines? could my "boss" distribute those two developer package files with the DDL scripts to the clients without breaking some kind of copyright?
2. Will I be able to import a Designer 9i r2 export into a Designer 10g r2 repository for my "boss" to make adjustments and produce refined DDL scripts himself later on?
If the only thing holding me back is having 10g installed where I work then tell me now and I'll take the plunge. If there's other issues I need to find a way around them.
I thank you in advance for any advice you can give
Thanks
Adam SawyerHi,
This issue has been reported with Designer Releases prior to 9.0.4.4 against 10g database.
Please upgrade to the latest Designer Release 9.0.4.5 the import will work fine.
HTH,
Wilson. -
Slow Performance - Java Related?
This is an old box that I bought used recently, but the system install is recent. The system performs very slowly - about 50% of the speed of comparable Mac's in the XBench database. If I use Xupport to manully run "All" of the system maintenance crons I get some improvement, but it quickly goes back to being slow.
Looking at my logs I have a "boat load" of Java errors under CrashReporter; there will be a string of "JavaNativeCrash_pidXXX.log" entries - many of them, as follows:
An unexpected exception has been detected in native code outside the VM.
Unexpected Signal : Bus Error occurred at PC=0x908611EC
Function=[Unknown.]
Library=/usr/lib/libobjc.A.dylib
NOTE: We are unable to locate the function name symbol for the error
just occurred. Please refer to release documentation for possible
reason and solutions.
Many of the line entries that follow, but not all of them, refer to SargentD2OL, which is a Java app, which I installed, but it did not work properly so I removed it. Yet I continue to get Java errors that refer to this now non-existant app.
I have read that Java apps use a lot of resources, and that D2OL in particular uses a lot of resources. Can my slow performance problem be Java related? If so, any idea of how I can fix this problem?
G4 AGP Graphics Mac OS X (10.3.9) 500 MHz, 512M RAMSorry to take so long to respond, but other issues in life have demanded my attention.
None of the solutions given have had any affect. My Java folder has both a 1.3.1 and a 1.4.2 app - the Java Update 2 will not reinstall because it sees an up-to-date app in the folder. But reading the update file it says the older Java will be removed - but it is still there. Problem?
On XBench the system scores a 9 to 10, while similar boxes on the XBench database score around 18 to 20. My cpu, memory, and video scores are very low. The HD through-put scores are the only ones that are normal. TechTool Pro 4 finds no problems. I have removed the memory sticks one at a time and retested after each cycle - no difference.
I have two drives, each with a 10.3.9 install. One works fine, scores around a 17 on XBench, the other scores a 9 to 10. So it appears to be a software problem. The slower install is a drive from a iMac G3 that has been moved to the G4 - are there issues with this?
My favored drive is the prior G3 one (newer and faster than the other drive that system tests faster in XBench) - it has my profile and all my info on it. It worked fine in the G3 - no problems.
Thanks for the help,
G4 AGP Graphics Mac OS X (10.3.9) 500 MHz, 512M RAM, ATI 8500 -
Slow Performance Weeks after Encryption
I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also try? Thanks!Yes, but nothing from Novell yet - I will keep pushing them forward and let you know if I get some results.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 8.3.2013 15:29 >>>
Sounds like you have a SR going on this also. Have you heard anything on a
fix? Mine has been stagnant for a while and I just bumped it to see if
anything has been figured out or if more info is needed from my side. Hope
to here something soon. This is a pretty severe problem especially when it
happens multiple times to a machine.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"Jouko Oksanen" <Jouko.Oksanen_re@move_efore.fi> wrote in message
news:513713E9.13C8.00F6.0@move_efore.fi...
Hi,
We have had (maybe) similar issues with our FDE setup that FDE policy
assigned devices tend to loose the policy and start to do disk decryption
and suddenly get once again the policy back and start to encrypt again. This
could be found from "ZCM agent, Full disk encryption, about, Agents status,
Settings, on section "Emergency Recovery Information" you could see events
'Zone Changed' what according to Novell support meant that the policy was
"re-initialized / changed" even our policy counter have not changed = policy
got lost in some phase.
We are now suspecting that there is some issues with the policy service that
plays tricks on us.
-j-
>>> Jim Koerner<[email protected]> 20.2.2013 19:57
>>> >>>
In ZCC on the devices that you are having issues with look at the Emergency
Recovery tab and see if you have multiple listings in here that corresponds
to the slowness. If so your devices are decrypting and then re-encrypting.
Your mention of being asked to reboot leads me to believe that is what is
happening to you.
I have had a few SRs going on this one for a while and it got bumped to
backend but no info in a month or so.
Jim Koerner
Server - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 and Internal Database on Win2008R2x64
Client - ZCM 11.2.2 MU1 on Win7SP1x64 and WinXPx32
"marklar23" wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
I encrypted my organization's laptops several weeks ago and did not
return them to users until after I could tell by device performance that
the bulk encrypting task had completed. I have two users that are
experiencing extremely slow performance on their systems. When the
users are typing anything like a Word document, upon each keystroke they
see the Windows 7 "circle" icon at the mouse cursor. This seems to come
and go several times over the week, and every few days we are getting a
request to resolve the issue but after restarting the behavior may not
act up anymore.
I found a TID suggesting to change
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Novell-FDE\Parameters\ThrottleEncryption to a lower level
like Idle or BelowNormal. Is there anything else that I should also
try? Thanks!
marklar23
marklar23's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=5123
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=464262 -
Slow performance with 2 new full T1 installed .
We've just added second Full T1 line to
this router to dedicate full T1 bandwidth our two database servers.We are still experiencing the slow performance to our remote location such as file copying and acceessing applications.below are configs and sh run.Any help and inputs are greatly appreciated.Is the router configuration correct? or need to be modified.Thanks
Danny.
router2621xm#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 1924 bytes
version 12.3
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
service password-encryption
service udp-small-servers
service tcp-small-servers
hostname OPS
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable secret xxxx
enable password xxxx
no network-clock-participate slot 1
no network-clock-participate wic 0
no aaa new-model
ip subnet-zero
ip cef
no ftp-server write-enable
class-map match-any VOIP
match ip dscp ef
policy-map VOIP-QOS
class VOIP
priority 1158
class class-default
fair-queue
random-detect dscp-based
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.157.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
ip address 192.168.7.1 255.255.255.0
ip policy route-map policyroute speed auto
full-duplex
no mop enabled
interface Serial0/0
ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0
service-policy output VOIP-QOS
no ip mroute-cache
interface Serial0/1
ip unnumbered FastEthernet0/0
service-policy output VOIP-QOS
no ip mroute-cache
router eigrp 15
network 192.168.1.0
network 192.168.2.0
network 192.168.3.0
network 192.168.4.0
network 192.168.5.0
network 192.168.6.0
network 192.168.7.0
network 192.168.8.0
network 192.168.151.0
network 192.168.152.0
network 192.168.153.0
network 192.168.154.0
network 192.168.155.0
network 192.168.156.0
network 192.168.157.0
network 192.168.158.0
network 192.168.201.0
no auto-summary
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.5
no ip http server
access-list 150 permit ip host 192.168.7.5 any
access-list 150 permit ip host 192.168.7.6 any
access-list 151 permit ip any any
dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit
route-map policyroute permit 10
match ip address 150
set interface Serial0/1
route-map policyroute permit 20
match ip address 151
set interface Serial0/0
line con 0
line aux 0
line vty 0 4
password xxxx
login
endA couple of items worth noting are the QOS policies themselves.
This is OK
class-map match-any VOIP
match ip dscp ef
Add this
class-map match-any VOIP-signalling
match dscp af31
match dscp cs3
Change the policy-map to reflect the changes
policy-map VOIP-QOS
class VOIP-signalling
bandwidth 16
class VOIP
priority 24
class class-default
fair-queue 256
random-detect dscp-based
The bandwidth is meant for 4 concurrent phone conversations so adjust up as needed. The priority is based on my own testing so take it as you may.
The most important statement is "fair-queue 256", by default you only get 16 queues. Allowing for 256 queues only uses a modest amount of memory so its a simple low impact choice for the router and allows more conversations between devices without interruption.
Upping the number of queues in your policy would be the best and most important item for your performance problem, next of couse to coercing EIGRP to load balance the T1s properly.
Brian
P.S. Create a loopback interface for the ip unnumbered use, cause if the Fa0/0 goes down everything goes down and you can't telnet in from anywhere to look at it. Eliminate the following items from the config by using "no" in fromt of them, a bit of research will tell you why, and start you toward eliminating a few other items.
service udp-small-servers
service tcp-small-servers -
Slow Performance when program was once 100% proficient
I am working on a 2011 Macbook Pro - OS X version 10.9.5
For over a year I have been working in Adobe Premiere Elements 11 on this computer with no issues. Recently the program began running EXTREMELY slow - for example., taking well over an hour to render video that previously would render in only a minute or two. Went to Apple - thinking it was my MAC - diagnostics on the MAC show the computer itself is fine.
Purchased Premiere Elements 13 (liked the new features and offerings) and was naively hoping it would fix my slow performance issue.
But program is still running horribly slow.
Any suggestions or similar issues?laurabodey
Premiere Elements 11 or 13 on Mac Computer.
Which program do you want to troubleshoot first?
Let us assume Premiere Elements 11....
1. Edit Menu/Preferences/Scratch Disk
Where are the Scratch Disk pointing and how much free space is at that location
Please assure a clean up of any pile ups of any preview files (Adobe Premiere Elements Previews File Folder), conformed audio files (Media Cache Files Folder), and conformed audio (best cleaned out through Edit Menu/Preferences/Media and the Media Cache Database area Clean button.
2. Download, install, and run the free ccleaner.
https://www.piriform.com/ccleaner/download?mac
3. How much installed RAM does you computer have? Are your source media stored on external hard drive (with the appropriate formatting for Mac)?
4. Does the information in online articles such as the following make any impact on your situation?
Seven ways to free up drive space | Macworld
Let us start here and then decide what next.
I am strictly and Elements Windows user who tries to find common ground between Premiere Elements Windows and Mac to address some of these issue. So, I am
not all that great on Mac locations. Please help me translate from Windows to Mac if necessary.
We will be watching for your results.
ATR
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have shared a calendar with my wife aptely called "Home" to which every time I update or rearrange something she gets an email, I understand that this is quite useful for informing her of any changes but when she makes changes I receive no notifica
-
Problem in passing parameters in command line in desktop
Hi, I am trying to generate reports from command line (Oracle Discoverer 4i Version 4.1.42.04.00) but I am facing problems when I try to pass date or numeric parameters. It seems to work with strings The following command is successful when i pass st
-
Javafx 2.1: Drag and Drop issue (Mac)
Hi all, As I related in other question I've posted here today, I'm having some problems when running my code which worked on windows now that I'm on a mac. This one is related to drag and drop, it used to work on windows (Write once, debug everywhere
-
Can any one tell me ...how to check my old posts ie before dec 2007..
Hi , After long time I am back to check my posts ..I didn't find.. Is there any way that I can check my past posts ...which is before dec 2007. Thanks M.V
-
Lock buttons to a background image
Hello everyone a few questions, i created a background image like the one i added into the post since the program im making have 3 steps i would like to put each step into one of the boxes of the background image and i want them to stay in that area