Slow response when query v$lock or some data dictionary

Hello,
We have a severe problem with our database performance problem. Here is the situation:
1. When query data dictionary such as v$lock from any Windows machine on the network, the performance is slow (about 3 minutes.)
2. When query v$lock directly on the server where database reside, the query come back fast (normal).
3. When query user table such as employees from any windows machine on the network, the performance is normal.
4. When query user table directly from server where the database reside, the query come back normal.
Looking at v$session_wait on the slow query, it is waiting on "SQL*Net message to client".
We have people from our network group, security group and did not find anything problem.
Thank for you help!!!

user8175606 wrote:
Hello,
We have a severe problem with our database performance problem. Here is the situation:
1. When query data dictionary such as v$lock from any Windows machine on the network, the performance is slow (about 3 minutes.)
2. When query v$lock directly on the server where database reside, the query come back fast (normal).
3. When query user table such as employees from any windows machine on the network, the performance is normal.
4. When query user table directly from server where the database reside, the query come back normal.
Looking at v$session_wait on the slow query, it is waiting on "SQL*Net message to client".
We have people from our network group, security group and did not find anything problem.
Thank for you help!!!I saw the same problem several times. All of them were related with wrong execution plan in the v$lock (and dba_locks, and others based on v$lock). For instance due to "crazy" optimizer mode FIRST_ROWS.
Also look at note 431770.1.
I suggest that when you looked at v$session_wait and saw the event "SQL*Net message to client" state of the event was not = WAITING. Please check. It means that Oracle is not waiting but is burning CPU.
Thus, please let us know - does another optimizer mode improve performance?
select /*+ all_rows */ * from v$lock;
select /*+ rule */ * from v$lock;

Similar Messages

  • Random users getting very slow response when opening messages/attachments or sending email

    I have a small number of users, mostly very senior management of course, who are experiencing slow response when trying to open email messages and attachments or send messages.
    They see the spinning wheel and sit there until it decides to open or send. If the message is opened  and closed again you would expect it to be quick reopening the same message, no, it does the same thing again.
    These users are all using Outlook 2010 and their mail accounts are on Exchange 2013. It does not seem to make a difference if they use a physical machine or log into a VDI.
    I do not have the same issue generally, though I have experienced this when using VDI and this has been seen using a number of different machine pools so it is not a specific pool.
    This is not specifically a VDI issue, as the 3rd paragraph says, the issues are seen on both physical and virtual machines.
    none of the mailboxes are particularly large, most are at around 60% of quota limit, and the same limit applies to almost all mailboxes across the organization. They also do not appear to have a huge number of messages stored, other users without issues
    have larger mailboxes and higher item counts. Any ideas what I need to look at to address this?

    Hi,
    How about OWA?
    If OWA works well, it seems an issue on the Outlook client side.
    Please try to run Outlook under safe mode and re-create profile for testing.
    Any related error/warning/information message left in App Log?
    Also consider the network Bandwidth.
    Thanks
    If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Very slow response when I click on a link, but almost instant response if I go back and click a second time.

    I often get very slow response when I click on a link, any link. But if I go back and click on the link again, then the page will open almost immediately. I discovered this by accident and noticed that this happens every time. It would be nice if I got fast response on the first click without having to do this silly procedure and it seems to me that there's a simple fix. I would appreciate it if you could help. I'm open to any and all ideas. Thanks again.
    Sincerely,
    Al
    Version 26.0 Firefox, Windows XP, sp/3

    Hello,
    '''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. Safe Mode is a troubleshooting mode, which disables most add-ons.
    ''(If you're not using it, switch to the Default theme.)''
    * On Windows you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
    * On Mac you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by holding the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
    * On Linux you can open Firefox 4.0+ in Safe Mode by quitting Firefox and then going to your Terminal and running: firefox -safe-mode (you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
    * Or open the Help menu and click on the '''Restart with Add-ons Disabled...''' menu item while Firefox is running.
    [[Image:FirefoxSafeMode|width=520]]
    ''Once you get the pop-up, just select "'Start in Safe Mode"''
    [[Image:Safe Mode Fx 15 - Win]]
    '''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, and you need to figure out which one. Please follow the [[Troubleshooting extensions and themes]] article for that.
    ''To exit the Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
    ''When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help other users who have the same problem.''
    Thank you.

  • Slow response when entering data to an empty cell?

    Hey there...
    I have this issue that when I start entering data into an empty cell or owerwriting one, the response is slow; when I press a button on the keyboard it takes roughly 1 second before anything visual happens in the cell, but when the data "makes it way through" the response is normal when hitting the keyboard.
    Is anyone else experince a slow response when entering data to an empty cell in Number 09 or when overwriting one?/ Anyone familar with a similar issue, and is there anybody who knows how to fix this, or is it just normal for Numbers 09 to be a bit sluggish in the beginning when entering data?
    I've recently swithced from Excel 2007 to Numbers 09, so sorry if the terminology is incorrect.

    Question asked and answered several times.
    Numbers was not coded by brains but by feet so, it behave sadly when the AutoSave Lion feature apply.
    I posted a script getting rid of that.
    Start from a template or duplicate the existing document just after opening it then close the original and work on the duplicate.
    As it was never saved, AutoSave doesn't apply to it;
    From time to time (say at least every ten minutes) call my script.
    It wil duplicate the doc in progress and save it with a date_time stamped name.
    this way, you will continue to enter datas in a never saved document.
    Search for the string Auto_Save in the existing threads.
    It's late and I'm too tired to search for you.
    Yvan KOENIG (VALLAURIS, France) lundi 26 décembre 2011 12:03:51
    iMac 21”5, i7, 2.8 GHz, 12 Gbytes, 1 Tbytes, mac OS X 10.6.8 and 10.7.2
    My iDisk is : http://public.me.com/koenigyvan
    Please : Search for questions similar to your own before submitting them to the community
    For iWork's applications dedicated to iOS, go to :
    https://discussions.apple.com/community/app_store/iwork_for_ios

  • LOG_FILE_NOT_FOUND when running cleaner manually after some data purge

    I hit LOG_FILE_NOT_FOUND error when running cleaner manually after some data purge, I searched the forum, found someone also faced the same issue before, but cannot find any clue on how to fix it. Below is the error trace and followed by our configurations
    Caused by: com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException: (JE 4.1.6)
    Environment must be closed, caused by:
    com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException: Environment invalid because of
    previous exception: (JE 4.1.6) /scratch/tie/thirdeye/index/data-store
    fetchTarget of 0x50f/0x3fb9dd6 parent IN=368491717 IN
    class=com.sleepycat.je.tree.IN lastFullVersion=0x510/0x2ca7d18
    parent.getDirty()=false state=0 LOG_FILE_NOT_FOUND: Log file missing, log is
    likely invalid. Environment is invalid and must be closed.
    at
    com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException.wrapSelf(EnvironmentFailureExcept
    ion.java:196)
    at
    com.sleepycat.je.dbi.EnvironmentImpl.checkIfInvalid(EnvironmentImpl.java:1439)
    at com.sleepycat.je.Environment.checkEnv(Environment.java:2117)
    at com.sleepycat.je.Environment.checkpoint(Environment.java:1440)
    at
    com.oracle.thirdeye.datastore.DataStoreManager.clean(DataStoreManager.java:402
    at
    com.oracle.thirdeye.infostore.InfoStoreManager.clean(InfoStoreManager.java:301
    ... 11 more
    Caused by: com.sleepycat.je.EnvironmentFailureException: Environment invalid
    because of previous exception: (JE 4.1.10)
    /scratch/tie/thirdeye/index/data-store fetchTarget of 0x50f/0x3fb9dd6 parent
    IN=368491717 IN class=com.sleepycat.je.tree.IN
    lastFullVersion=0x510/0x2ca7d18 parent.getDirty()=false state=0
    LOG_FILE_NOT_FOUND: Log file missing, log is likely invalid. Environment is
    invalid and must be closed.
    at com.sleepycat.je.tree.IN.fetchTarget(IN.java:1332)
    at com.sleepycat.je.tree.IN.findParent(IN.java:2886)
    at com.sleepycat.je.tree.Tree.getParentINForChildIN(Tree.java:881)
    at com.sleepycat.je.tree.Tree.getParentINForChildIN(Tree.java:809)
    at
    com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.findINInTree(FileProcessor.java:1152)
    at com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.processIN(FileProcessor.java:1090)
    at
    com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.processFile(FileProcessor.java:538)
    at com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.FileProcessor.doClean(FileProcessor.java:241)
    at com.sleepycat.je.cleaner.Cleaner.doClean(Cleaner.java:463)
    ------------Configurations-------------------------
    EnvironmentConfig.ENV_RUN_CLEANER -> false
    EnvironmentConfig.CHECKPOINTER_HIGH_PRIORITY -> true
    EnvironmentConfig.CLEANER_EXPUNGE -> false
    Any hints are appreciated. I'm also working for Oracle CDC, feel free to call me at 861065151679 or drop me an email at [email protected] so that we can talk more in detail
    Anfernee

    Anfernee, I will contact you via email.
    --mark                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

  • Oracle 8i giving slow response when running sql query

    hi ,
    i am using oracle 8i server ;
    and sql query giving slow response before some days;
    so which parameter need to increase
    DB_BLOCK_BFFERS OR SHARE_POOL_SIZE
    CURRENT SETING IS
    DB_BLOCK_BUFFER=256000;
    SHARE POOLSIZE=300M;
    pls advice to me
    thanks

    No parameters need to be increased. Tuning is not done but making arbitrary changes to values and hoping that good things will happen by accident.
    The thing you really should be worrying about is your antique database and likely its impact on your skill set unless you are one year away from retirement.
    Where's the actual version number?
    Where's the DDL?
    Where's the DML?
    Where's the Explain Plan?

  • Slow response when deleting from PSA or overlapping requests

    Hi
    We have experienced slow response times when the 'delete' jobs are kicked off from the process chain to delete PSA data as well as overlapping requests from cubes in the past two weeks. When displaying the processes via SM50 it appears that the job is not running, however in SM37 the status of the job is 'Active'. Eventually it does finish, but sometimes it times out. Any suggestions?

    Hi
    When it completes it does the correct deletion of the overlapping requests. It only cancels without a shortdump. Here is a job log of one of these jpbs:
    14.02.2006 05:47:45 Job started                                                                      
    14.02.2006 05:47:45 Step 001 started (program RSPROCESS, variant &0000000670942, user ID ALEREMOTE)  
    14.02.2006 05:47:54 FB RSM1_CHECK_DM_GOT_REQUEST called from PRG RSSM_PROCESS_REQUDEL_CUBE; row 000214
    14.02.2006 05:47:54 Request '437,729'; DTA '0PM_C01'; action 'D'; with dialog 'X'                    
    14.02.2006 05:47:54 Leave RSM1_CHECK_DM_GOT_REQUEST in row 70; Req_State ''                          
    After the last step, that is where the entire job comes to a halt. It stays like that until we manually cancels it or it finish some hours later. We have recently uploaded patch level 28 on BW 3.0B, and am not sure if that could be the cause.
    Thanks :->

  • Extremely Slow Response when attempting to display files on Windows Server

    I have set up File Sharing on my MacBook Pro using SMB and defined the folders that are available to be shared. When I look at the Network Neighbourhood in Windows Explorer the Macbook appears listed with all the other PCs on the network. When I try to open the Macbook in Explorer it takes a very long time to open (about 2 minutes or so) and shows me the list of folders. When I try to open a folder the exact same thing happens - it opens after a couple of minutes, this continues for every folder that I try to open. I thought it might be that Explorer needed to "catalog" the files in the folders but the same thing happens each time - if I close the connection and try again it takes the same amount of time. What is very strange is that if I connect to the Windows Server from the Mac opening and looking at shared folders/files is instantaneous so clearly this is not a network problem. If I use the Win2K3 server to look at other computers/files the result is the same - instantaneous access, so it has nothing to do with the Win2K3 server - clearly the problem is with the MacBook serving up the file information to the Win2K3 server. I have tried with AFP on and off and the result is the same. The user name/pwd is the same on both the Win2K3 and the Macbook - and I have tried with a different username on the Win2K3 - no difference. Anyone have any ideas as to why this is happening?

    Yes they are on the same workgroup, on ethernet, plugged into the same switch. The Mac can read and copy files of the Win2K3 server with no problem. The problem is clearly at the Mac end as the Win2K3 server can view files on any machine on the network without the slow response, the Mac can view files on the Win2K3 server without the slow response, it is only when the Win2K3 server tries to view files on the Mac.

  • Slow response when using Xcelsius web service connection witn input values

    We've been very successful in using the Xcelsius Web Service Connection. We've recently moved forward toward using input values when calling a web service and having issues with response time. Without input values, it takes 3 - 6 seconds to retrieve and display the results in Xcelsius, but, when using the input values to the web service, it takes about 27 seconds for Xcelsius to retrieve and display the results.  Does anyone have experience with fixing slow response associated with using input values for a web service connection?

    Hi Sharone,
    What's the version of your Xcelsius and BOBJ server?
    I'm asking because using the last version of BOBJ server (BOXI 3.1 SP 3) you have new services on CMC just to help Xcelsius to work better with WebServices.
    Regards,
    Rodrigo.

  • I'm experiencing extremely slow response when attempting to open the control center from the lock screen, any suggestions?

    When trying to access the control center from the lock screen, it takes anywhere from 2 to MANY swipes to get a response.  Never opens on the first try.

    I'm not having the same problem, but there is a feature in the OS that attempts to discern from swipes to unlock and swipes to open control center. This is what you may be experiencing.

  • Slow response when calling a web service from an ADF client in JDev 11g

    I have generated a web service (WS) for a stored procedure package with 3 functions. The WS has less than 1 second response times when I use the standard WS testing facility. I then created a data control for the WS selecting the default values in the JDev wizard. When I test the functions from a very basic ADF client the response times for the same functions are between 3-4 seconds i.e. very SLOW compared to the actual response time of WS. I need some advice on how to investigate this performance degredation as seen from the ADF client.
    Could the problem be that the data control was created from a web service in the same project? Maybe it is necessary to have them in separate projects or create a proxy?
    I created and tested the web service with the standard WS test tool and then simply went on to create a data control from this web service for use from a ADF client.
    Some background info:
    I saw the following warning in step 8 of the WS creation wizard:
    "The configured policy store location at "C:\Oracle\Middleware\jdeveloper\j2ee\home\gmds" is invalid. Application cannot read policies from this location. Check that the directory name is correct and the location exists."
    Also I can confirm that there is no j2ee directory in my environment.
    The application server logs the following for each call from the ADF client:
    009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.adf.model.connection.webservice.impl.WebServiceConnectionMessages debugGetSaajInteraction
    INFO: Creating a SaajInteraction for oracle.j2ee.ws.model.OperationImpl@1c81d2c
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.adf.model.connection.webservice.impl.WebServiceConnectionMessages debugGetSaajInteractionResult
    INFO: Created [email protected]79edc for oracle.j2ee.ws.model.OperationImpl@1c81d2c
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.j2ee.ws.rm.LogMessages logExceptionAsWarning
    VARNING: Internal error: oracle.wsm.policy.model.PolicyModelException: WSM-01647 : There are no policies that match the specified category wsrm and resource pattern {1}.
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.fabric.common.AbstractSecurityInterceptor init
    INFO: AbstractSecurityInterceptor:init(), client.mode.jse==ture and isJEE==true, probably is a case of JEE client calling JSE client
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.wsm.agent.WSMAgent init
    INFO: WSMAgent is initialized for category=management, function=agent.function.client, topologyNodePath=null, isJ2EE=true
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.fabric.common.AbstractSecurityInterceptor init
    INFO: AbstractSecurityInterceptor:init(), client.mode.jse==ture and isJEE==true, probably is a case of JEE client calling JSE client
    2009-apr-01 15:55:22 oracle.wsm.agent.WSMAgent init
    INFO: WSMAgent is initialized for category=security, function=agent.function.client, topologyNodePath=null, isJ2EE=true
    2009-apr-01 15:55:24 oracle.wsm.common.logging.WsmMessageLogger logSevere
    ALLVARLIG: error in the Oracle WSM Policy Resolver Initialization, because incorrect configuration is passed: {0} {1}
    Edited by: user10601664 on Apr 8, 2009 7:11 AM

    Find solution. Check this thread:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/wdjava/faq%2b-%2bmodels%2b-%2badaptive%2bweb%2bservice
    The com.sap.tc.webdynpro.model.webservice.api.IWDWSInvocationModifier interface can be implemented by an application using the Adaptive Web Service model in order to modify the web service invocation object just before it's execution. Invocation modifiers need to be registered with the executable model class for which invocation is to be modified:
    Request_NumberToWords requestMO = new Request_NumberToWords(model);
    requestMO.wdSetInvocationModifier(
      new IWDWSInvocationModifier() {
        public void doModifyInvocation(Object port) {
          HTTPControlInterface httpItf = HTTPControlFactory.getInterface(port);
          //timeout for this WS invocation is 120 sec; don't use global config. setting of WS-Runtime
          httpItf.setSocketTimeout(120000);
        public void doModifyAfterInvocation() {}
    Best regards.

  • Table contained in a topic causes slow response when working with source

    I am using RoboHelp V8.0.2 (I have applied the two fixes available from the Adobe product site).
    Here is my issue:
    I am documenting a product that has over 1,500 metrics.
    I am trying to make a list of 1,077 metrics in one topic (all the metrics are of the same "type" so they are grouped together).
    The table presenting these metrics has two columns, a Field Name column and a Description column.
    There is not a lot of text within the table - most of the explanations and calculations are defined outside the table.
    When I have more than about 400 table rows, the response time working with the topic in source is just horrible.
    It took 3 minutes to open the topic in source, another 3 minutes to move the table over .425in from margin.
    When I try to close the project, it gets hung up.
    Has anyone else run into a problem working with tables within a topic?
    I had a similar response time issue with V8.0.0 in general when I first installed it.
    Once I installed the two fixes, that problem was (for the most part) eliminated.
    I think the second fix specifically addressed response time issues when working in source.
    I am going to try this on one of my other writer's machine to see if it is the age of my computer.
    My computer setup is:
    Dell Precision work station with an Intel Xeon 2.40GHZ processor and 2MB of RAM.
    I am using Windows XP Professional 5.1.26 Service Pack 3.0.
    I have a 110 GB hard drive with 18 GB available.
    As always - thanks for any insight or information.
    Michael F Weart

    Hi Michael.
    Interestingly the maximum number of rows you can use when you create a table via the Table > Insert > Table menu item is 100. That said, I've just created a 500 row table and whilst it is slower than a smaller table it is OK. I am also using RH 8.0.2 but on a higher spec PC.
    Read the RoboColum(n) for a tips, tricks and musings on the Technical Communication Suite products.
    Follow the RoboColum(n) on Twitter

  • Why firefox has slow response when i 'm saving pictures to hard disk?

    I have windows 7 64 bit and Mozila firefox ver. 17.0.1. I have the following problem. When i try to save a picture from a site (right mouse click and save as) to the hard disk of my pc, the response of firefox is slow. It takes about 6 to 10 seconds. I thought it was a matter of file size but it proved that it was irrelevant, because it was happening to pictures from 10kb to 500kb. I did the following:
    - clear history
    - clear cache from firefox and the folder ''cache'' in my profile
    - delete the files downloads.sqlite and localstore.rdf
    - i changed the ''browser.download.manager.scanWhenDone'' and ''services.sync.prefs.sync.browser.download.manager.scanWhenDone'' to false
    - clear the downloads window
    - disable all add-ons
    After all these, the problem still remained
    Then i started firefox in safe mode (help --> Restart with Add-ons Disabled...). The problem still remained.
    Then i disabled Microsoft security essentials (real time protection) and windows firewall. I do not have any other anti-virus or firewall on my pc. Nothing happened.
    Then i created a new profile (reset firefox). Nothing happened. So, one last attempt was left to do. Reboot with safe mode. So i followed the following steps.
    i ran msconfig and disabled ''Microsoft Security Client'' from start up tab and ''Microsoft Antimalware Service'' from services tab. So i did a safe mode boot with network support and windows firewall, disabled. Guess what. Nothing happened.
    I noticed that when i was trying to save pictures, during the process, there was a significant hard disk activity (the led indicator of hard disk activity was lighting constantly) and firefox on the left upper corner, shown the message ''not responding'' for about 6 to 10 seconds. You understand that saving a picture of 19kb in 10 seconds is not normal.
    Is this problem has to do with the cache? The hard disk is an SSD (solid state drive). Do you think it would be better to redirect cache to memory? (i have 6GB total RAM). This problem was also happening to previous versions of firefox, but i think that with this version, the problem is more frequent. It is not happening with every picture, but it happens with more than 65% of the pictures.
    It also happens when loading a web page, but it might be a matter of a heavy web page that uses many resources of my system, during loading. The problem is the same. Constant hard disk activity and it takes time to load the web page. The problem with web page loading, is not as frequent as with saving pictures.
    I think it is a matter of cache management. What is your opinion?
    Thank you.

    The cause to my problem was the jump lists, that Windows 7 introduced. There are two kinds of jump lists, automatic and custom. Automatic jump lists were causing the slow down of firefox through window explorer. Finally it was a problem of windows explorer and not firefox. Windows 7 introduced many new features that cause slow system performance. Anyway the solution to the problem is to follow the steps:
    1. Open mycomputer and on the address bar paste the path: %AppData%\Microsoft\Windows\Recent\AutomaticDestinations
    2. Press ctrl + a
    3. press shift + delete and delete everything inside the folder
    I think that the respective jump list of windows explorer is the one that starts with 1b4dd67f29cb1962, in case you don't want to delete every jump list in the folder. If you use firefox, download a file and then go to the above mentioned path and view files by date. The most recent file should be the correspondent with firefox.

  • Slow response when trying to play music on iPad 2

    When I try and play music on my iPad 2 the response is now really, really slow..I have recently downloaded ios7 so not sure if that is the problem...has anyone else had this happen and if so what did you do to resolve the issue?

    Hi angela dfromtx,
    When tracks in iTunes display a it means the file cannot be located; it may have been moved or deleted. You'll have to locate the file manually if it is still available. For more information refer to the following article:
    iTunes: Finding lost media and downloads
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1408
    Alternatively, if your media was downloaded from the iTunes Store, you may be able to download it again free of charge:
    Downloading past purchases from the App Store, iBookstore, and iTunes Store
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2519
    Thanks,
    Matt M.

  • Slow response when reading barcode in RFID

    Hi All.
    We're facing trouble when scanning barcode in some RFID transactions. When reading barcode for example, Material number is written very slow, it takes aproximately 2 seconds to write each character, so, for a string for 15 characters it takes more less 30 seconds to write the full code scanned.
    We're using terminal cm9090-g, Windows Mobile 5 release 1.35 and running SAP ECC 6.0.
    If you need any further information, please let me know.
    Please advice.

    No, phones do not have upgradeable RAM. Actually, IMO that was the mis-engineered fault of the N97, for all its capabilities, its hampered by too little RAM for too many applications. It would take quite a little knowledge of the quirks of Symbian to get it to run smoothly.
    For example, choosing the right combination of widgets. Obviously if your widgets comprise of two shorcut bars, music player, calendar and contacts, this would use very little RAM, compared to a combination of contacts (withh RSS), Accuweather, Facebook, Email and Shortcuts.would eat up more RAM since Facebook and Accuweather and the Email would always be running.
    When you get the app called KillMe, kill certain tasks which you do not use. For example, do you use handwriting recognition? No? Then Kill peninputmanager. What about Voice Commands? Kill Voice Command Manager. Things like that could ease up on your RAM. Also, dont worry about accidentally Killing something, since under the "A" tab, which is the one where the safe to Kill operations are, that's where you do your killing. Also the apps you killed will work again once you restart the phone.
    If you find my post helpful please click the green star on the left under the avatar. Thanks.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do I get address bar to go directly to the site addressed and not search

    I use the address bar to go directly to sites. Yahoo interprets my input as a search request and delivers the same mess of options that a search bar would provide. I want the address bar to only connect to the site for which I type in the address. If

  • Photoshop CS5 crashes when using certain function

    Hi, I have just downloaded the trial version of Adobe CS5 and it appears to crash when you use specific tools.  Particularly the program crashes when I try to perform a photomerge or view System Info.  There is no exact error message except a generic

  • URL: newbie needs help with simple programming question!

    Hi everyone, Please direct me to a FAQ or other resource, or help me with this problem: I want to create a text field (or similar container) that contains both ordinary text AND a URL/hyperlink in it. For example, the following text might appear in t

  • Unknown error - (PARM), .pdf settings and Illustrator problems

    I am using Illustrator CS3, and recently I no longer had choices for .pdf settings when saving from Illustrator as a .pdf. The only setting is "Custom" and I can't scroll to another choice. As I understand it, if I load .pdf settings in Illustrator t

  • Apps on ipad 2 two times or more bigger as usual...

    Hi, all the apps on my ipad 2 are twice (or more) as big as usual...like when you zoom out everything on the screen...I restarted it two times but it did not help...what should I do? Thanks a lot