Smart Collection-Collection Filtering

Is there a way to use a smart collection to filter on another specific collection name? Trying to use a smart filter to show ranked photos from 2010 which are NOT in the Best of 2010 manual collection. As I move photos into the Best of 2010 collection they drop from the smart filter as they should. However, the fact that a photo is in another collection, completely different name, ends up causing the photos to be excluded from the smart filter. It's like the collection filter is a yes no for being in any collection; regarless of the name.

Nevermind. I need to be more carefull in my naming and when to use quotes. Typing in the name Best of 2010 in the collection does not contain filter, without double quotes, means that any collection name with any of the words (Best, of, 2010) are excluded. Putting double quotes around the name got the results I was expecting; excluding the photos in the "Best of 2010" collection specifically.

Similar Messages

FontBook and "Show Fonts" stuck because of bad smart font collection-how to delete/reset?

Hi, I tried to make a change to the "Fixed width" smart font collection in FontBook, to make it find the "Adobe Source Code Pro" font.
Now FontBook and any "Show Fonts" dialog are stuck within 1-2 seconds of launching, especially when clicking on the "Fixed Width" collection.
How can I either reset the "Fixed Width" collection to its original, or delete it altogether?
Console output when crashes happen:
11/22/13 7:37:27.747 AM spindump[11747]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.crashreporter.writereport.hang
com.apple.message.signature: Font Book
com.apple.message.signature2: UNBUNDLED ||| 5.0 (250)
com.apple.message.signature3: hang
com.apple.message.result: noop
com.apple.message.summarize: YES
Sender_Mach_UUID: 0276F31C-4740-353E-A49F-F78FCB0F2A80
I have tried to clear my font caches and to remove the ~/Library/Preferences/com.apple.Font* entries but nothing helps. Any idea where FontBook stores its smart collections, so that I can delete them

I had a similar problem where I created a new smart collection and fontbook became permanently frozen regardless of reboots of the application or the machine itself. Here's what worked for me:
Find a new font to install.
With Fontbook closed, open the new font file from Finder by double clicking. It should default to opening the file in a Fontbook sub-window mini-preview.
Click "Install." This should install the font as usual and give Fontbook a new script to replace the frozen loop it was in.
Delete the evil "smart collection."

In Oracle E Business Suite, Advanced Collections - Collections Form..

Hi All,
Can anyone please let me know how we can get mapping for the columns that are referenced on advanced collections - collection form. We cannot get the same from help as many of the columns are mapping columns.
Mainly I struck in the notes and Work items tables, where I could not get the data. Any suggestions are great help.
Base Tables mapping is helpful.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Chandra Babu

When the JRE was installed/configured on the workstations was the jar cache placed on a LAN drive instead of the local drive? We have experienced poor performance with both the JRE and Jinitiator when the Workstation Sysadmins configured the jar cache to be located on a LAN drive. Also is the size of the jar cache on the workstation sufficient to hold all of your required jar files. It could be downloading the jar files all the time.
Overall our performance with the JRE is comparible to the Jinitiator.
Sorry I have not experienced the problem that you are having with you pdf reports so I can't provide any comments on it.

Smart Collection collecting too many keywords

I created a smart collection with only one rule - Keywords/Contains/'Landscape' - but many other images that do not contain that keyword appear in the collection. It doesn't happen with any other keyword as far as I know. I tried re-creating the collection, re-keywording my images, etc. but with no success. How can I fix this problem?

Darbs,
I suspect that Landscape is a parent keyword for several others. Look in your keyword list to see if that's the case.
Alternatively, you could set the Keyword Tags entry to "Keywords & containing keywords" to see what's going on:
Hal

Error Smart Form Collections using various Form Classes

I want to add a Smart Form into a collection contianing two PDS's .
Before I add the Smart Form the collection works.
The Collection is using customized form-class ZLSO_PWB_COVER and one PDF #1 is using standard form-class LSO_PWB_COVER and PDF #2 is using standard form-class LSO_PWB_CURRI_INFO.
After I add the Smart Form into the collection, the process errors out.
Any ideas why by adding the Smart Form I would get an error?

Solved myself.

Smart Folders and Filtering based on Focal Length

Can we please be given the ability to create Smart Folders and be able to Filter images based on focal length?
Doing so based on Lens alone does not take into account that more and more people rely on zoom lenses. When you have 16-35, 27-70, 35-135 and 70-200 lenses, one could benefit from having the ability to search for images created in wide-angle, normal, zoom and tele-zoom ranges.
Providing this feature would be greatly appreciated.
Regards, JML

Thanks Colin, I will try it.
Sounds like it may work - however bit awkward solution in otherwise ergonomic LR environment :-(
I really do not understand why this value is not among the filtering metadata when LR recognizes it and shows it on every corner. Especially considering the fact LR is supposed to be full WF solution and certain development settings cannot be effectively applied without selecting images only with certain focal length values.
The very last feature I am missing on this SW designed to cover entire WF (since LR1) is the distortion/perspective control and ability to apply corrections based on lens/focal length used.
b Does anyone have an idea if Adobe plans to eventually implement this feature?
I do not want to be forced to use DxO which always means interruption of the WF and inevitably generated new files on disk.

Smart objects and filters in elements 10-how to?

please help...thanks

The main use of Smart Objects is to embed an image file into a PSD so that it can maintain resolution independence. This means you can non-destructively transform (scale, rotate, skew) the layer without losing the quality of the orignal file. You can still change the opacity or blend mode of a Smart Object layer and apply Layer Styles from the Effects panel as well. So Smart Objects allow for true non-destructive editing in Elements, but not with the sophistication of Photoshop CSx.
Whether or not Viveza works with Photoshop Elements 10 is up to the manufacturer of the plug-in.

"Today" smart Mail folder filters for wrong date

Hi
The Today smart folder in Mail is set to show today's messages, but is showing messages dated August 8 instead.
I only got my MacBook Air yesterday and it's my first Mac, but I'm computer-literate so I checked the date setting and it's correct. I've set the main language to Catalan but I can't see how that might affect the way the Mac reads the date - and anyway, today's date in my preferred version - dd/mm/yy - would be read as August 9th under the preferred US format, mm/dd/yy.
PS: Any hints on how to scroll quickly to the top or bottom of the list of emails?

Thank you Tom.
It seems to have made a difference (took me a while to get back to it as I had some urgent work to take care of first).
But now, Today is finding every single draft version of every email I have drafted during the day - and Mail seems to save a draft every minute, for which I am grateful but not if they're all going to turn up in my Today folder!
Any suggestions?

Erreur lors de la collecte Collecte de mac adresse de stations distantes en Visual Basic Access 2007 fonction GetMACAddress

Bonjour et bonne année (il est encore temps),
Nous avons développé en VBA sous Access 2003 (migrée sous Access 2007), une application qui, pour un hostname netbios saisi, récolte sur
le réseau l’@ mac associée. Les hostnames peuvent correspondre à des
stations Windows, unix, imprimantes, ...
Nous utilisons pour cela la fonction getmacaddress utilisant les commandes
NBASTAT et la fonction Copymemory de la librairie
kernel32 (voir la programmation plus loin)
Il semble que depuis que nous avons migré en Windows 7, cette application ne fonctionne plus, l’application se refermant sur erreur.
Après test, j’ai constaté qu’elle fonctionne toujours correctement sur station XP.
J’ai essayé d’utiliser les commandes wmi en lieu et place de
NBASTAT : Wmi ne retourne que les macadresses correspondant à des stations Windows et ne répond donc pas à notre besoin.
Auriez vous une solution pour continuer à btenir les macaddress et adresses IP ip des matériels réseau distants (stations Windows, unix, impimantes, ...) par
programmation sous Access VBA en Windows 7 ?
Un grand Merci d’avance
GetMacaddress :
Public Function GetMACAddress(ByVal NameHost As String) As String
    On Error Resume Next
    Dim tmp As String, pASTAT As Long
    Dim NCB As NET_CONTROL_BLOCK, AST As ASTAT
    Dim NameOK As Boolean
    Dim t
    Dim octet0 As String
    Dim octet1 As String
    Dim octet2 As String
    Dim octet3 As String
    Dim octet4 As String
    Dim octet5 As String
    NCB.ncb_command = NCBRESET
    Call Netbios(NCB)
  NCB.ncb_callname = NameHost
    NCB.ncb_command = NCBASTAT
    NCB.ncb_lana_num = 0
    NCB.ncb_length = Len(AST)
    pASTAT = HeapAlloc(GetProcessHeap(), HEAP_GENERATE_EXCEPTIONS Or HEAP_ZERO_MEMORY, NCB.ncb_length)
    If pASTAT = 0 Then
        Debug.Print "Erreur d'allocation memoire"
        Exit Function
    End If
    NCB.ncb_buffer = pASTAT
    Call Netbios(NCB)
    CopyMemory AST, NCB.ncb_buffer, Len(AST)
    NameOK = False
    For t = 0 To 5
        If AST.adapt.adapter_address(t) <> 0 Then
            NameOK = True
            Exit For
        End If
    Next
    If NameOK = True Then
        octet0 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(0)), 2)
        octet1 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(1)), 2)
        octet2 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(2)), 2)
        octet3 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(3)), 2)
        octet4 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(4)), 2)
        octet5 = VBA.Right("0" & VBA.Hex(AST.adapt.adapter_address(5)), 2)
        tmp = octet0 & "-" & octet1 & "-" & octet2 & "-" & octet3 & "-" & octet4 & "-" & octet5
        HeapFree GetProcessHeap(), 0, pASTAT
        GetMACAddress = tmp
    Else
        GetMACAddress = "-1"
    End If
End Function
WMI :
Public Function Macadresse() As String
Dim computer As String
Dim wmi As Object
Dim vadapter As Object
Dim query As Variant
Dim mac As Object
Dim mac_ids As String
computer = "hostnamestationdistante"
Set wmi = GetObject("winmgmts:\\" & computer & "\root\cimv2")
'Set wmi = GetObject("winmgmts:{impersonationLevel=impersonate}!\\" & computer & "\root\cimv2")
Set vadapter = wmi.execquery("select * from win32_networkadapterconfiguration where Ipenabled = true")
For Each mac In vadapter
    mac_ids = mac_ids & ", " & mac.macaddress
Next mac
If Len(mac_ids) > 0 Then mac_ids = Mid$(mac_ids, 3)
Macadresse = mac_ids
End Function

Smart Collection Filtering Problem

I have set-up identical smart collections in both Bridge and Lightroom 2.4.
In Bridge I have a Keyword called "Collages" and a sub-keyword (under Collages) called "Story Bridge".
In Bridge there are some images where I have only clicked on the sub-keyword "Story Bridge" (and not Callages). There are other images where I select the keyword "Collages" as well as sub-keyword "Story Bridge".
In Bridge I then set-up a smart collection that filters for both "Collages" and "Story Bridge". Both must be in the keywords for the image. This filters correctly ie the images that were only keyworded as "Story Bridge" are not included in the collection.
I then go to Lightroom and synchronise the relevant folders so all keywords in Bridge are brought into Lightroom.
I then set-up exactly the same Smart Collection that must have both "Collages" and "Story Bridge" as their keywords. This time Lightroom also includes all images that were only keyworded with "Story Bridge". Why is this so? I only want the images that have both "Collages" and "Story Bridge" in their keywords but I now also get the images with just "Story Bridge" as their keyword.
I have selected "Match all of the following rules" and added 2 rules for "Collages" and "Story Bridge".
In Bridge I get the correct filtered images but in Lightroom, with the same rules, I get all images with "Collages" or "Story Bridge" as keywords.
I have attached the smart collection filter dialogue boxes for both Bridge and Lightroom.
Any help would be appreciated.

I suspect that we will see these differences go away in time. Bridge is part of the Creative Suite and Photoshop family and codebase. Lightroom, while part of the Photoshop family, was a whole new approach with an entirely different codebase. Over time we'll see more convergence and various aspects of the applications will operate similarly.
I'm sure it's a monumental task for the teams at Adobe to coordinate all these moving pieces and features. Who knows what LR 3.0 and CS5 will bring to the table!

Smart Collection bug with Title doesn't contain rule

Hi,
There are various articles on smart collections that check if the "Title" field is filled or not. Because the "Title" field doesn't have an "is empty" like function, the sugested solution is to use the rule:
Title   doesn't contain   a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z
But there is a bug in this rule. I found that the letter 't' is causing a problem. The letter 't' seems to include all characters.
Situation:
Four images that have a their Title field as follows:
Image 1:
Image 2: 2014-01 - Street Photography.dng
Image 3: 2014-01
Image 4: Some Image
(Image 1 has an empty title)
Four smart collections with the following rules:
Collection 1: Title   doesn't contain   a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,t,u,v,w,x,y,z
Collection 2: Title   doesn't contain   0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9
Collection 3: Title   doesn't contain   a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k,l,m,n,o,p,q,r,s,u,v,w,x,y,z
Collection 4: Title   doesn't contain   t
My expected result of the smart collections is:
Collection 1: Image 1 and Image 3
Collection 2: Image 1 and Image 4
Collection 3: Image 1 and Image 3
Collection 4: Image 1, Image 3 and Image 4
The actual result of the smart collections is:
Collection 1: Image 1
Collection 2: Image 1 and Image 4
Collection 3: Image 1 and Image 3
Collection 4: Image 1
I'm using Lightroom 5.7 on a MacBook Pro 17" (mid 2010), i7 @ 2.66GHz, 8GB RAM and 2 x 240GB SSD's running on OS X 10.10.1
My questions are:
Can anyone, specially from the Adobe Lightroom team, confirm this?
How to solve this issue?
With kind regards,
Dennis
www.idemi.nl

That is a bizarre bug. There is an even simpler way to reproduce the problem: Have two pics, one with title "a" and the other with title "t". The criterion "Title Contains a" correctly shows just the first picture, but the criterion "Title Contains t" shows both.
Searching with smart collections and filters has numerous bugs, but this one is by far the most surprising. As a geek programmer, I'd love to know what causes this!
Adobe rarely reads this forum -- I suggest you post this in the official Adobe feedback forum, which Adobe does faithfully read (but only infrequently responds).

Bug: Smart Collection/Label text/doesn't contain

LR 2.1 & 2.2, 64-bit, Vista:
Create a smart collection using "Label text"--"doesn't contain"--"xxx".
The collection *shows* images with the "xxx" label text just as if the collection was created using "Label text"--"contains".
Produceable 100% of the time.
Any one else have the same problem?

That is a bizarre bug. There is an even simpler way to reproduce the problem: Have two pics, one with title "a" and the other with title "t". The criterion "Title Contains a" correctly shows just the first picture, but the criterion "Title Contains t" shows both.
Searching with smart collections and filters has numerous bugs, but this one is by far the most surprising. As a geek programmer, I'd love to know what causes this!
Adobe rarely reads this forum -- I suggest you post this in the official Adobe feedback forum, which Adobe does faithfully read (but only infrequently responds).

Lens setting as Filter and/or Smart Collection?

Hello,
In the "view Option" menu I can choose to show "lens setting" parameter (focal lenght).
But I can't filter the images by "lens setting", there isn't this option in the Library filter - metadata.
Also a I can't create a Smart collection by "Lens setting".
There is the "lens" option showing lens model only...
Can you help me?

The screen shot shown below shows one way of creating a Smart Collection that filters shots that may have been taken the range 21-28mm. Note that for this type filtering you need to use any for the Match rather than all. I find that contains words in this type of filter reduces the number of false positives (e.g. 240 mm can get through contains all whereas it's filter out by contains words)
any is OR and all is AND

Filtering immutable/unmodifiable collections

Hi,
I need a general purpose collection filter:
Given a collection, return another collection that excludes certain members of the first collection. Additionally I'd prefer that the new collection retains other attributes of the original (e.g. Comparator if SortedSet etc).
I considered cloning the given collection and then removing undesired elements. Is there a clean way to do this?
In jakarta commons I notice something that comes close (http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/jakarta-commons/collections/src/java/org/apache/commons/collections/CollectionUtils.java), however it modifies the original collection.
     * Filter the collection by applying a Predicate to each element. If the
     * predicate returns false, remove the element.
     * <p>
     * If the input collection or predicate is null, there is no change made.
     * @param collection the collection to get the input from, may be null
     * @param predicate the predicate to use as a filter, may be null
    public static void filter(Collection collection, Predicate predicate) {
        if (collection != null && predicate != null) {
            for (Iterator it = collection.iterator(); it.hasNext();) {
                if (predicate.evaluate(it.next()) == false) {
                    it.remove();

copy constructors. I can't remember the last time I
made a class I wrote cloneable.Me neither :) However, I frequently use existing clone() methods in the collections framework (e.g. Vector.clone() etc.)
Is there a reason you need a completely generic
method
to do this? (other than the appeal of writing
beautiful code).I'm writing a utility. I don't want to build in restrictions if I can help it.
Do you actually have an application that requires
this
functionality where you actually use every collection
type?Not sure I get your drift ... The client application currently uses Vector(legacy), ArrayList, HashSet, TreeSet and LinkedHashSet (no LinkedList yet). So there aren't too many implmentations at all. However, I'd like the filter method to be general (see above).
And .clone() won't work for some reason?Can I clone/copy without code like:
if(collection instanceof <particular-collection-implementation>) {
}which I'm trying to avoid (for reasons above) ?

Keywording/Collection Bug?

I had a set of 12 images in a collection. I selected all twelve and applied a keyword to them (eg. "AAAAA"). Then I hit command-L to switch off the catalog filters. I then went to the Keyword list panel and confirmed that the number of images with the keyword was indeed 12. I then clicked on the right arrow for the keyword "AAAAA"
This should result in the filter bar popping up and I would expect to see my twelve images. Instead I only saw six and the Library Filter keyword for "AAAAA" has the number six by it. If I go to each individual file in its folder and check the keyword tags I correctly see the keyword "AAAAA" for each of them. The Catalog has "All Photographs" selected, so it is not as if I am only searching a subset of my catalog. If I go to the folder(s) where the files are located and individually remove and then re-add the keyword, I see the image I just "keyword-fixed" pop up in the filter search. So, it seems to me there is a bug when applying keywords to images in a collection.
Anybody else seen this? Some screen shots are on my blog.
Dave
www.davehartleyphoto.com

That is a bizarre bug. There is an even simpler way to reproduce the problem: Have two pics, one with title "a" and the other with title "t". The criterion "Title Contains a" correctly shows just the first picture, but the criterion "Title Contains t" shows both.
Searching with smart collections and filters has numerous bugs, but this one is by far the most surprising. As a geek programmer, I'd love to know what causes this!
Adobe rarely reads this forum -- I suggest you post this in the official Adobe feedback forum, which Adobe does faithfully read (but only infrequently responds).

Smart Collection-Collection Filtering

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for