[SOLVED] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found

I got fed up typing the password every time I push some files to a server with scp, as I do it a lot with this project. Public/private key pair is not really an option (read: I do not want to send anything else but the web app files to the server) as the host is not my own, nor it is my client's. Instead it is my client's client's host.
So I installed filezilla. And got this:
> filezilla
filezilla: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found (required by filezilla)
I did a quick pacman -Syu as always, and the error still comes up.
> strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBCXX
GLIBCXX_3.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.1
GLIBCXX_3.4.2
GLIBCXX_3.4.3
GLIBCXX_3.4.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.5
GLIBCXX_3.4.6
GLIBCXX_3.4.7
GLIBCXX_3.4.8
GLIBCXX_3.4.9
GLIBCXX_3.4.10
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
GLIBCXX_3.4.12
GLIBCXX_3.4.13
GLIBCXX_3.4.14
GLIBCXX_3.4.15
GLIBCXX_3.4.16
GLIBCXX_3.4.17
GLIBCXX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH
Now what?
Perhaps some alternatives? What's your favorite GUI FTP client? Mine's WinSCP, but it's only for windows AFAIK.
I have used gFTP in the past, but the gui design is just horrible. For example ctrl+v is some key binding to do something else than paste from clipboard. And then there is no drag&drop. It also crashes if I open more than one file to edit at the same time. All these little details drive me nuts with gFTP.
Last edited by Lazzu (2013-10-14 16:23:23)

~ > pacman -Qo /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 is owned by gcc-libs 4.8.1-3
~ > strings /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 | grep GLIBCXX
GLIBCXX_3.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.1
GLIBCXX_3.4.2
GLIBCXX_3.4.3
GLIBCXX_3.4.4
GLIBCXX_3.4.5
GLIBCXX_3.4.6
GLIBCXX_3.4.7
GLIBCXX_3.4.8
GLIBCXX_3.4.9
GLIBCXX_3.4.10
GLIBCXX_3.4.11
GLIBCXX_3.4.12
GLIBCXX_3.4.13
GLIBCXX_3.4.14
GLIBCXX_3.4.15
GLIBCXX_3.4.16
GLIBCXX_3.4.17
GLIBCXX_3.4.18
GLIBCXX_3.4.19
GLIBCXX_DEBUG_MESSAGE_LENGTH
Is your system fully up to date?

Similar Messages

/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found

I am trying to run the firefox from firefox-4.0.tar.bz2 on CentOS 5.6 and get the error message,
./firefox-bin: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by firefox/libxul.so)
Firefox does not start.
I thought having a copy of the library in the local directory would help, so I made a link:
ln -s /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.8 libstdc++.so.6
then I got the error message,
./firefox-bin: /firefox/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by firefox/libxul.so)
My version of glibc is:
$ rpm -q glibc
glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2
glibc-2.5-58.el5_6.2

Yes, that led to my solution. There was a lot of noise in the two links, but some solid signal. Ths solution came from dietux's reference in /questions/777306 Bug 621704 to http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=2075033 :
1. Download the Fedora 9 package of libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm from http://archives.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/releases/9/Fedora/i386/os/Packages/libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm .
2. Unpack the package in your Firefox 4 directory with relative paths (does not require super user permissions):
[firefox]$ rpm2cpio libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386.rpm | cpio -i --make-directories
3. Move the library and its link to the Firefox 4 directory:
[firefox]$ mv usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6* .
[NOTE: this is a RELATIVE path -- it has no leading slash.]
4. Run Firefox 4:
./firefox
Thank you for your help!
Craig
P.S. I do agree with the posters in [[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621704| Bug 621704]] that CentOS 5.x is NOT obsolete. The whole point of CentOS (and RHEL) is that it will be around for awhile. I left Fedora for CentOS because it changed too much.

I installed firefox4.0.1 it crashes on startup safe-mode error /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by /home/firefox/firefox/libxul.so)

I am using 2.6.23.1-42.fc8

That is this bug:
*[https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621704 Bug 621704] - Lib dep problem: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.9' not found (required by .../libxul.so)
*[/questions/811309]
*[/questions/777306]

Error /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 : version 'GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr

Hi,
I have written a cpp plugin to call when the deactivate workflow is processing I have the OAM 10.1.4.3 version installed.
I am able to compile the file. But when try executing it from the workflow i am facing the below issue.
Error /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 : version 'GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libstdcc+.so.6)
Help me resolve this issue
Thanks.

Hi,
I think you are in the wrong forum here :-)
Regards
Patrick

[Solved] avidemux2_qt4: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: `GLIBCXX_3.4.15'

I suddenly cannot run my avidemux2_qt4
$ avidemux2_qt4
avidemux2_qt4: /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.15' not found (required by avidemux2_qt4)
$ pacman -Q avidemux-qt
avidemux-qt 2.5.4-3
$ pacman -Q gcc
gcc 4.5.2-6
$ pacman -Q glibc
glibc 2.13-4
$ sudo find / -name libstdc++.so.6
/usr/lib32/libstdc++.so.6
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
Last edited by Doctor Drive (2011-03-30 18:59:37)

fixing...

UnsatisfiedLinkError: `GCC_4.2.0' not found(req. /usr/lib/libstdc++.so

bash-3.2$ ldd /koba/c/libs/libbluejni-1.1.so
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0xf7dfe000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/librt.so.1 (0xf7df5000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7cb1000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0xf7c8a000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0xf7c7d000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00670000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0xf7c66000)
bash-3.2$ ldd /koba/c/libs/libgcc_s.so.1
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xf7dc5000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00670000)
bash-3.2$ ldd /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
linux-gate.so.1 => (0xffffe000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/libm.so.6 (0x009db000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x00a0a000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x0068e000)
/lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x00670000)
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /koba/c/libs/libbluejni-1.1.so: /koba/c/libs/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1751)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1676)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:822)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:993)
at com.comp.blue.jni.BlueJNI.initialize(BlueJNI.java:31)
at com.comp....AbstractLaunchpad.<init>(AbstractLaunchpad.java:188)
at com.comp....LaunchPadMultiProcess.<init>(LaunchPadMultiProcess.java:78)
at com.comp....LaunchPadMultiProcess.main(LaunchPadMultiProcess.java:56)
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /koba/c/libs/libbluejni-1.1.so: /koba/c/libs/libgcc_s.so.1: version `GCC_4.2.0' not found (required
by /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6)
at java.lang.ClassLoader$NativeLibrary.load(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0(ClassLoader.java:1751)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary(ClassLoader.java:1676)
at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0(Runtime.java:822)
at java.lang.System.loadLibrary(System.java:993)
at com.comp....BlueJNI.initialize(BlueJNI.java:31)
at com.comp...AbstractLaunchpad.<init>(AbstractLaunchpad.java:188)
at com.comp....LaunchPadMultiProcess.<init>(LaunchPadMultiProcess.java:78)
at com.comp....LaunchPadMultiProcess.main(LaunchPadMultiProcess.java:56)
Please suggest why am I getting that error. It seems to be missing GCC_4.2.0 but not sure what I should do.
Last edited by srikanthradix (2011-12-02 20:56:54)

Hi,
I think you are in the wrong forum here :-)
Regards
Patrick

[SOLVED]/usr/lib/arch-tempfiles line 106: install:command not found

Hi everyone!
This is my boot.log
http://pastebin.com/1gfynhSN
It says"/usr/lib/initscripts/arch-tmpfiles:line 106: install:command not found".This is leading to problems such as dbus and network manager not being started(even manually),no shutdown option,not able to 'open' log files without sudo etc.
I think a possible reason for this is that I had messed up with symlinks.I had issued the command
sudo ln -s /bin/install /usr/bin/install
.Then I had used
cd /bin/
unlink install
Now,I find that /bin/install and /usr/bin/install does not exist.(I have deleted them!) .How can I fix this up?Any help would be appreciated.
Last edited by adwaita45 (2012-04-05 20:41:40)

Reinstall coreutils (or manually extract install from the package and put it in /usr/bin).
Last edited by Raynman (2012-04-05 18:14:10)

/usr/lib/libcurl.so.4: version `CURL_OPENSSL_3' not found

Hello guys,
I need to instal an application to generate a scenery for X-Plane but when I click on the executable I get:
./WED: /usr/lib/libcurl.so.4: version `CURL_OPENSSL_3' not found (required by ./WED)
How could I solve it?
Thanks

The PKGBUILD doesn't list any conflicts and just seems to install some older libs with different so-name versions.
It should work fine with the normal curl package.
vulnerabilities / security problems : there's a reason curl abandoned those older versions.
I'd recommend installing it, runing the app that needs it, then removing it.
You could also try to contact the creator of the application and ask them for an uptodate version.
debian wheezy (stable) has curl 7.26 , so the app won't work with debian stable also.

Itunes won't start up - can't find usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib

Hi,
I had to reinstall the OS 10.3.9 on my ti-book. I did an archive and install, but now iTunes won't start up. Console says it can't find this dynamic library:
usr/lib/libstdc++.6.dylib
Since I have a lot of my songs in my personal lib on this machine, and podcast susbscriptions, etc - I don't want to lose them if possible.
Is there a way to just install this lib, or will I have to reinstall iTunes altogheter?
I searched for the above file, but can't find it on the disk.
thx.
'mark

Do you have any iTunes plugins? You may want to get rid of them and try again.
Also, have you tried removing the corresponding com.apple.itunes.plist files from <youraccount>/Library/Preferences, logging out, logging back in again (or rebooting) and then relaunching iTunes? I don't think an archive and install will refresh this file for you. Nor will reinstalling iTunes.

Gcc issues /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6:could not read symbols

Error i get when compiling an openGL, bullet program. I just started getting this on both my arch computers after updating.
gcc Timer.o Ball.o main.o -I/usr/include -lGL -lGLU -lBulletCollision -lBulletDynamics -lLinearMath -I/usr/include/bullet -L/usr/lib -lglut -lX11 -o pool
/usr/bin/ld: Ball.o: undefined reference to symbol '__cxa_pure_virtual@@CXXABI_1.3'
/usr/bin/ld: note: '__cxa_pure_virtual@@CXXABI_1.3' is defined in DSO /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 so try adding it to the linker command line
/usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

I realised that and changed it, it's still giving a simmilar error
g++ Timer.o Ball.o main.o -I/usr/include -lGL -lGLU -lBulletCollision -lBulletDynamics -lLinearMath -I/usr/include/bullet -L/usr/lib -lglut -lX11 -o pool
/usr/bin/ld: Timer.o: undefined reference to symbol 'clock_gettime@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
/usr/bin/ld: note: 'clock_gettime@@GLIBC_2.2.5' is defined in DSO /lib/librt.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line
/lib/librt.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Last edited by seniorsassycat (2011-12-10 01:16:00)

"lib/libfreebl3.so: version `NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3' not found"!!

I'm trying to setup Sun Java System Web Server7.0 on the fedora11. And then I have a problem with "configuration failed".
I get the error massage:
**Apr 25, 2011 7:33:38 PM com.sun.web.admin.configurator.ConfigureServer main**
**WARNING: /sun/webserver7/lib/libadminjni.so: /sun/webserver7/lib/libfreebl3.so: version `NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3' not found (required by /lib/libcrypt.so.1)**
**java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /sun/webserver7/lib/libadminjni.so: /sun/webserver7/lib/libfreebl3.so: version `NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3' not found (required by /lib/libcrypt.so.1)**
I've already searched a lot on the internet, but still cannot found an appropriate method. Most people said it's because the version of libfreebl3.so in my installer package is too old.
I want to know the details about how to handle this.
Thank you very much!!

I think this is a Fedora specific problem. I don't see this problem in Ubuntu.
Fedora has linked libcrypt.so with NSS libraries.
$ ldd /lib64/libcrypt.so.1
linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fff555ff000)
libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00000030dfe00000)
libfreebl3.so => /lib64/libfreebl3.so (0x00000030f0a00000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00000030dfa00000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x00000030e0200000)
Hence any application which links to libcrypt.so has to use Fedora's
libfreebl3.so. (libcrypt.so wants a libfreebl3.so which is from
NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3 library, not a generic libfreebl3.so)
Web Server links with libcrypt.so and indirectly links libfreebl3.so from OS.
This conflicts which libraries what Web Server 7.0.x ships. (libcrypt.so
doesn't like libfreebl3.so shipped with Web Server 7.0.x)
I could not think of any good solution for that so far.
One workaround would be to get a libcrypt.so compiled and copy in
<webserver_install_location>/lib but that is something not trivial.
IMHO, any application which links with libcrypt.so and has it's own version of
libfreebl3.so won't work on Fedora.

Java -version bash: java: command not found

Hi all.
I wanna install java on linux (OpenSUSE). When I checked java -version, it shown that :
java -version
bash: java: command not found
Can any solution about it, please!

Sukirmanster wrote:
I wanna install java on linux (OpenSUSE). When I checked java -version, it shown that :
java -version
bash: java: command not foundNot surprising if you have not installed java yet.
Can any solution about it, please!If you have installed java, read a unix/linux manual,
pay particular attention to bash (or any shell) and the role of $PATH.

[Solved]/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 is truncated

Since before I can remember I've had the following output after installing anything from pacman:
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so.0.1.1 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so.0 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0.1.1 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so.0.1.1 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_stc-2.8.so.0 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0.1.1 is truncated
/sbin/ldconfig: file /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 is truncated
I hoped it would be ok to forget about it, but no such luck. Now I'm trying to compile amule-cvs from yaourt:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.2.2/../../../libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so: file not recognized
Compilation then stops. So, are the two problems related? I've tried the main amule package in extra for the time being, but when I run it I get 'bus error' from the console, so I really would like the cvs version.
Last edited by shadeheim (2007-10-16 20:57:10)

The files are owned by wxgtk-2, so I just made sure all the corrupt versions of the package were removed from my cache.
sudo rm /var/cache/pacman/pkg/wxgtk-2.*
Then do a 'pacman -Sy wxgtk' and choose to upgrade if need be. If all goes well you will no longer get the warnings from pacman, and both the binary and cvs packages will install and run fine.
Last edited by shadeheim (2007-10-16 20:56:54)

[Solved]/usr/lib/libGL.so.1 symlink keeps changing on package installs

Hello,
I recently switched my desktop from using the proprietary nvidia drivers to nouveau. After doing so, I experienced seg faults in many applications (emacs, xfce4-session). I tracked down the problem to be caused by the /usr/lib/libGL.so.1 symlink pointing to the wrong file. I noticed that if I looked in /usr/lib, I would see libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.190.42 when in fact it should have been pointing to mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0. ( https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=174663 )
Changing the symlink by hand ( sudo ln -sf mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0 libGL.so.1 ) makes everything work again, but every time I install something new the symlink goes back to libGL.so.190.42.
What is causing this symlink to change on every package install and how can I stop this from happening?
Thanks!
Last edited by mikej_96 (2013-12-23 21:25:19)

Oh wow - how can this even happen?
I verified that the libGL.so.1 symlink was correct:
ls -lah libGL.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 13 12:12 libGL.so -> mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 23 14:20 libGL.so.1 -> mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 13 12:12 libGL.so.1.2.0 -> mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 775K Aug 29 2009 libGL.so.185.18.36
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 906K Oct 25 2009 libGL.so.190.42
Then rename the 'bad' libGL file.
$ mv libGL.so.190.42 libGL.so.190.42.why_is_this_here
Then, re-install archlinux wallpaper
$ pacman -S archlinux-wallpaper
warning: archlinux-wallpaper-1.4-1 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Packages (1):
Name Old Version New Version Net Change
extra/archlinux-wallpaper 1.4-1 1.4-1 0.00 MiB
Total Installed Size: 11.78 MiB
Net Upgrade Size: 0.00 MiB
:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n]
(1/1) checking keys in keyring [################################] 100%
(1/1) checking package integrity [################################] 100%
(1/1) loading package files [################################] 100%
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [################################] 100%
(1/1) reinstalling archlinux-wallpaper [################################] 100%
Then check the symlink again
$ ls -lah libGL.so*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 13 12:12 libGL.so -> mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Dec 23 14:16 libGL.so.1 -> libGL.so.190.42.why_is_this_here
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Dec 13 12:12 libGL.so.1.2.0 -> mesa-libGL.so.1.2.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 775K Aug 29 2009 libGL.so.185.18.36
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 906K Oct 25 2009 libGL.so.190.42.why_is_this_here
It moved back to the unwanted libGL file.

[SOLVED] /usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset does not exist...

Update:
I'd still like to understand what this /usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset file is all about. But apearantly I don't really need it. I fired up my xubuntu installation to spellcheck the LyX document. And because the ~/.aspell.en.pws on Arch had more added words in it I was about to copy it over the Xubuntu copy... Fortunately I compared them first and noticed that the working Xubuntu ~/.aspell.en.pws was a 212 line file beginning with "personal_ws-1.1 en 211" (evidently reflecting the number of words @ 1 per line) while the broken ~/.aspell.en.pws on Arch was a 299 line file beginning with "personal_ws-1.1 en 299 xray" Considering I had recently deleted one word/line from it the only part that didn't make sense was the word xray... changed that line to "personal_ws-1.1 en 298" and aspell is working again.
But I still don't know where the word "xray" came from, nor why aspell thought it meant there should be an "/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset" file... ???????
End Update (Original post below)
I think I did something stupid... And it broke aspell.
What I did was: I was spellchecking a LyX document (which uses aspell) and
I accidentally added a misspelled word. Whenever I've done that in the past
I simply opened my ~/.aspell.en.pws with vim, and deleted the misspelled
word from the list. But this time I'd been using aspell indirectly and
while I closed LyX's pop-up spellchecking utility before I switched to a
terminal window, I didn't close LyX itself. (I didn't think it would matter
as long as it wasn't actively spellchecking at the time...) Well I got rid
of the misspelled word OK. When I switched back to LyX every thing seemed
to work normally until I pressed <F7> to start up the spellchecker again.
At that point LyX crashed...
When I try to use aspell from the command line in a terminal window I get
this:
JtWdyP -> /home/jtwdyp/tmp
>
JtWdyP -> /home/jtwdyp/tmp
> echo "test txt a tst file" > test.txt
JtWdyP -> /home/jtwdyp/tmp
> aspell -c test.txt
Unhandled Error: The encoding "xray" is not known. This could also mean that the file "/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset" could not be opened for reading or does not exist.
Aborted
JtWdyP -> /home/jtwdyp/tmp
> ls /usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset
ls: cannot access /usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset: No such file or directory
JtWdyP -> /home/jtwdyp/tmp
>
I've tried logging into my root account and:
UnderTree =->
UnderTree =-> pacman -S aspell
warning: aspell-0.60.6-4 is up to date -- reinstalling
resolving dependencies...
looking for inter-conflicts...
Targets (1): aspell-0.60.6-4
Total Download Size: 0.00 MB
Total Installed Size: 3.79 MB
Proceed with installation? [Y/n] y
checking package integrity...
(1/1) checking for file conflicts [##########################] 100%
(1/1) upgrading aspell [##########################] 100%
UnderTree =->
But aspell still fails with the same error, and the file:
/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset
still doesn't exist...
Next it occurred to me that for all I know, reinstalling with "pacman -S"
might not be as complete as installing a new package so I thought that if I
removed aspell first, I might be able to get a cleaner install...
UnderTree =->
UnderTree =-> pacman -R aspell
checking dependencies...
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: aspell-en: requires aspell
:: enchant: requires aspell
:: lyx: requires aspell
UnderTree =->
I'm not so sure I want to remove enchant & lyx to test that theory...
So I guess I gotta ask, how do I go about getting a replacement
"/usr/lib/aspell-0.60/xray.cset" file????
jtwdyp
J(tWdy)P
Joe(theWordy)Philbrook
Last edited by jtwdyp (2010-11-10 17:20:19)

ukhippo wrote:Have you tried using “-t nat” instead of “-t NAT” in your iptables command?
I hate you, and I love you (with emphasis on the love)...
That did it, stupid spelling mistake trying to use NAT, bah Thank you!
Last edited by Torxed (2014-06-04 17:52:07)

[SOLVED] /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.18' not found

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for