[Solved]Xfce fonts look strange in Terminal

Never had this before maybe something went wrong on the catalyst installation, can't really describe it either so I will just post a picture.
Hope that you can help it isn't really fatally but it's just ugly
Last edited by heldiho53 (2014-10-01 18:56:05)

brebs wrote:
I would exit xorg (otherwise xorg will probably crash), then run as root:
fc-cache -rf
/usr/share/fonts: error scanning
/usr/share/fonts/encodings: error scanning

Similar Messages

Bitmap fonts look ugly in terminal?

http://i.imgur.com/60oKumZ.png
The lemon font looks absolutely horrible, any idea's on how to fix it?
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --

2ManyDogs wrote:
Try adjusting the letter spacing in your ~/.Xresources.
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Urxvt#Font_spacing
Remember to reload .Xresources after you make the change, or nothing will happen.
That did fix it a lot, but, it still doesn't look the same. It's too "squarey" if that makes sense? Here's a comparison/
Mine:
What it's supposed to look like:
I had it working fine before, but now all of a sudden it just shit the bed
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
Last edited by jasonwryan (2014-11-05 04:50:50)

Itunes is displaying in Japanese , all th fonts look strange. Just upgraded

Athlon Windows XP
Just upgraded to 7.02 and all text looks strange and music looks to be for the Japan market and price of download in in Yen. All my setting in iTunes are for English.
What can I do?

ME TOO!
At first I thought it was cute, "oh look now I can listen to cool J-pop bands like Bump of Chicken and BoA", but it won't go away. Where is my itms that I know and love.
And who wants to pay up to 200 yen for a song? That's like two dollars.
Plus I can't read Japanese.
Is everyone's iTunes like this right now?

[SOLVED] Odd font spacing in gnome-terminal

Hi guys, i'm new to Arch and i'm loving it: everything is working flawlessly apart from monospaced fonts that look more spaced than what i'm used to (Ubuntu), here is what i'm talking about:
I tried -lcd and -ubuntu packages, changed hintstyle to both full/medium/slight but all to no avail, do you have any ideas?
Here is my configuration, that i'm using in Ubuntu and Arch right now:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE fontconfig SYSTEM "fonts.dtd">
<fontconfig>
<match target="font">
<edit name="autohint" mode="assign"><bool>false</bool></edit>
<edit name="antialias" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
<edit name="hinting" mode="assign"><bool>true</bool></edit>
<edit name="hintstyle" mode="assign"><const>hintslight</const></edit>
<edit name="lcdfilter" mode="assign"><const>lcddefault</const></edit>
<edit name="rgba" mode="assign"><const>rgb</const></edit>
</match>
</fontconfig>
Thank you in advance!
<edit>
Some clarifications: the configuration does get applied, so it's not due to misplaced configuration files, the font tracking just doesn't look right.
The depicted font in the screenshots is Menlo, but any other monospaced font, such as the Droid Mono, will look wrongly spaced.
</edit>
Last edited by bmanuel (2011-11-06 11:12:45)

Oh well, it seems i got it: it seems that just selecting a size of 7.5 instead of 8 get exactly the same spacing as if using a size of 8 in Ubuntu, this without installing any -ubuntu/-lcd/-cleartype patches, only vanilla arch packages.
The dumb gnome-3 new font selector will *not* permit selecting intermediate sizes and won't let you enter "7.5", so fire up gconf-editor and just change the value for apps.gnome-terminal.profiles.Default to be, as in my case, "Menlo 7.5".
Finally, sensible spacing in my terminals!

Installed photoshop, now all fonts look strange

Hey everyone,
I installed photoshop and now my safari pages look crazy. The font is different and smaller, everything seems slightly zoomed out, and changing setting in safari preferences hasn't changed anything.
HELP!

Clear the font cache files from the system.
Close all running applications. From an administrator account, open the Terminal app and enter the following command:
sudo atsutil databases -remove
This removes all font cache files. Both for the system and all user font cache files. After running the command, close Terminal and immediately restart your Mac.

[SOLVED] Fonts and themes look strange in xfce

Hi all,
I've recently installed Arch Linux on my laptop and I've installed xfce4 as desktop environment. It's all ok except that the fonts and themes.
Here some screenshots:
http://architetturearoma.altervista.org … arch/2.png
http://architetturearoma.altervista.org … arch/3.png
The first one is with the clearlooks theme, the second one with graybird.
Do you see how fonts looks weird?
Why graybird is rendered in this way?
I may have forgotten some essential packages?
Last edited by giuliom_95 (2014-10-22 07:55:45)

There is no need to bump your thread: use the edit button https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Fo … te#Bumping
Please remember to mark your thread as [Solved] by editing your first post and prepending it to the title.

[Solved] Openproj looks strange in the awesome WM

Hi Community,
I just installed openproj from the AUR. But when I run it in the awesome WM, I found the background of the application looked nearly blank, which made openproj impossible to edit in.
It looks strange. So, openproj cannot be run from the awesome WM?
Any idea will be helpful. Thanks.
=======
Solved:
Just edit the file /usr/bin/openproj and add a line to be as follows:
#!/bin/sh
wmname LG3D
java -Xms128m -Xmx768m -jar /usr/share/openproj/openproj.jar > /dev/null
Last edited by cwjiof (2010-01-12 14:45:20)

Thank you very much!
=====
Edit:
I've found a detailed description from this article: Java GUI application in Awesome Window Manager.
There is a known problem with Java and the non-reparenting Window Managers like for example Awesome.
Java applications which use the XToolkit/XAWT backend may draw gray windows only. The XToolkit/XAWT backend breaks ICCCM-compliance in JDK 5 and 6 because it assumes a reparenting window manager.
There are a number of places where this is described:
* in the FAQ : GUI Java apps appear as a gray screen!
* in the wiki Problems with Java
* in the Man page
To sum up:
* it doesn't affect version Java 1.4.2 and before.
* it doesn't affect version Java 1.7 and hopefully after.
* the best workaround by far, is to set a name to the Window Manager, so it is recognise by Java as a non-reparenting Window Manager. A simple utility allow to set this name. Just add 'wmname LG3D' to your .xinitrc or simply run it.
* Here are other workarounds left here for reference:
o launch another X server, like Xephyr
o set the following environment variable (to use the older Motif back-end instead): AWT_TOOLKIT=MToolkit. But this won't work in the following cases :
+ OpenJDK/IcedTea doesn't include the Motif toolkit.
+ doesn't work for x86_64 Java, for whatever reason
Last edited by cwjiof (2009-10-19 12:07:14)

In v.4 fonts look blurry. Can you solve this shortcoming ?

Fonts look blurry in the overall menu in this new version of browser (v.4). I tried all the options that you specified with the ClearType an so on... It seems that the problem is not from Windows 7 because the old version looks ok. Can you solve this shortcoming ?
Until you resolve it I'll stay with the previous version (3.6.16) which it looks really good.

Yea, when I actually install my applications and launch them from GNOME Shell's menu or launcher the fonts look as blurry as they do when I launch them from Anjuta. Other applications look fine and with the workarounds I described above, my own applications display nicely too when launched from either GNOME Shell or Anjuta.

[solved]Mono font substitution problem in gnome terminal

I have to edit mono font substitution in 65-nonlatin* in /etc/fonts/conf.d
Still don't understand why font rendering in terminal is different from the rest of the system though...
Don't know where else to post this, so it ends up here...
I just upgraded fontconfig today and substituted the ubuntu packages (cairo, freetype2 and libxft) with the cleartype ones (as the later are up-to-date and turn out looking cool too).
The only problem I have now is that mono font substitutiton got messed up in gnome-terminal.
Both gedit and terminal use the system mono font (which is set to Monospace), with Liberation Mono as the preferred font. But somehow the terminal decides to use a different font (looki like my Chinese font: wenquanyi-zenhei).
If I tell the terminal to use Liberation Mono, I get a serifed Chinese font, so this is not a solution for me.
I've read somewhere that gnome-terminal does not follow the system fontconfig? It gave me a lot of trouble the last time I upgrade the relevant files. So unfortunate that it decides to be naughty again this time...
Last edited by allbluedream (2008-07-30 11:25:08)

http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Configuring_locales instructed me to 'export LANG=en_EN.utf8' to set the system language to english, yet that locale doesn't exist in locale.gen. Of course, I had neglected to look in locale.gen for such an entry to uncomment it, or I would have noticed the error sooner. All is working now.

Make openbox fonts look like the ones in XFCE/GNOME

Recently I did (once again) a li'l bit of DE shuffling, and I've discovered that fonts look nicer on XFCE and GNOME compared to ones in openbox. Of course, OB doesn't tweak your font config, but leaves it "as is", but I'd really like to get the "hidden stuff" from XFCE/GNOME. Those fonts look really nice...
Any ideas on how to do that?
Last edited by mandalic (2011-11-04 19:48:38)

Naah... XFCE does something odd with fonts, so I installed freetype2-infinality from AUR. It works like a charm!!!
Last edited by mandalic (2011-11-05 13:21:42)

[SOLVED] Desktop looks strange after upgrade to Gnome3!

Hi there,
I just upgraded my system (about 200 packages) and when I rebooted my Login-Screen looked strange.
When I logged in the strange screen persisted... Arch told me that Gnome3 couldn't be loaded and
that this has probably something to do with my graphics hardware.
This is what it looks like:
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/70 … otown.png/
As you can see my Dekstop looks like shit. Also the WiFi Password isnt saved, which is a minor issue for me.
But what really sucks is that the system flag is missing!!
I have no idea how to even start to solve this...
Please help!!!
-- mod edit: read the Forum Etiquette and only post thumbnails http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/For … s_and_Code [jwr] --
Last edited by gunjah292 (2011-05-05 13:03:56)

gunjah292 wrote:
I found out the problem, I checked the box in the second tab of the gnome-session-properties! I renamed the /.config directory in my home directory, rebooted than deleted the new .config and named the old one back!
Now it works again!!
Sorry to have stolen your time!
bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647359
gunjah292 wrote:How can I mark this solved??
edit the first post.

[SOLVED] XFCE menu entry problem

For some reason that I don't recall, I had qt installed. After removal though, there is still the "Qt Designer" item in the Xfce menu. I've followed the wiki's instructions but couldn't remove it.
/usr/share/applications looks like this:
Terminal.desktop gkbd-indicator-plugins-capplet.desktop nvidia-settings.desktop xfce-display-settings.desktop xfce4-logout.desktop
Thunar-bulk-rename.desktop gksu-properties.desktop pidgin.desktop xfce-keyboard-settings.desktop xfce4-mixer.desktop
Thunar-folder-handler.desktop gksu.desktop polkit-gnome-authorization.desktop xfce-mouse-settings.desktop xfce4-panel-manager.desktop
Thunar.desktop gmenu-simple-editor.desktop rhythmbox.desktop xfce-session-settings.desktop xfce4-power-manager-settings.desktop
alacarte.desktop gnome-do.desktop ristretto.desktop xfce-settings-manager.desktop xfce4-run-program.desktop
avahi-discover.desktop gnome-terminal.desktop services.desktop xfce-ui-settings.desktop xfce4-screenshooter.desktop
bssh.desktop gnome-volume-properties.desktop shares.desktop xfce-wm-settings.desktop xfce4-sensors.desktop
bvnc.desktop google-chrome.desktop thunar-settings.desktop xfce-wmtweaks-settings.desktop xfce4-settings-editor.desktop
evince.desktop gsynaptics.desktop thunar-volman-settings.desktop xfce-workspaces-settings.desktop xfce4-taskmanager.desktop
exo-preferred-applications.desktop gucharmap.desktop tilda.desktop xfce-xfcalendar-settings.desktop xfce4-terminal.desktop
file-roller.desktop mimeinfo.cache time.desktop xfce4-about-xfce.desktop xfce4-web-browser.desktop
firefox-safe.desktop mousepad.desktop totem.desktop xfce4-accessibility-settings.desktop xfprint-manager.desktop
firefox.desktop nact.desktop users.desktop xfce4-appfinder.desktop xfprint-settings.desktop
gconf-editor.desktop nautilus-cd-burner-open-iso.desktop vlc.desktop xfce4-clipman-plugin.desktop xfprint.desktop
geany.desktop nautilus-cd-burner.desktop xfburn.desktop xfce4-dict.desktop
gedit.desktop network.desktop xfcalendar.desktop xfce4-file-manager.desktop
gimp.desktop nm-connection-editor.desktop xfce-backdrop-settings.desktop xfce4-help.desktop
I can't seem to find anything qt related here. What should I do?
Last edited by dcc24 (2009-11-04 21:03:46)

I've solved it. Turns out, some menu entries are stored in ~./local/share/applications. Removing it there solved the problem.

Saving as PDF: fonts look crappy?

I have a small test .psd image with just one piece of text. When I save this as .pdf from Photoshop CS4 (using Save As and choose Photoshop PDF format) and open the .pdf with Acrobat 9, the font looks pretty messed up. Here's an example of what I mean:
http://i26.tinypic.com/5flp2p.jpg
I have attached the example .psd (and saved .pdf) here.
Now the strange thing is: it doesn't happen *always*, sometimes the PDF looks all right. I can't seem to detect what it depends on. I have plenty of available RAM and harddisk space, that's for sure. It seems to occur especially when I already have another PDF open in Acrobat as well. For example, if I copy the test.pdf from above zip to test2.pdf, then open one in Acrobat, then the other, the first may look all right (not always) and the 2nd usually looks messed up.
What's going on? I'm not sure if this is a problem with Acrobat rather than PS, but it happens ONLY with PDFs I save from PS. Never with PDFs from any other source.
Thanks in advance if someone can clear this up!

Font embedding rules, for sure. If a font is considered "locked" and thus un-embeddable, any program is required to convert it to contours as per the PDF language ruels. By keeping a document open under the same name you may just trigger that weird behavior and PS is just not good at it. On the other hand, you could just use a wrong PDF preset and it flattens things to a low quality. As a third possibility, PS could jsut embed the font name reference and then for some inconceivable reason it doesn't get associated in Acrobat. Hard to tell. I'm just not in the mood to do any deeper investigation after a hot, long day full of work, so maybe someone else has a better answer for you...
Mylenium

Issues with 1920 resolution, fonts look tweak and broken

i just bought a new led display, wich allows 1920x1080 resolution.
With this resolution fonts looks like tweak and broken, very annoying.
Firefox is the only application that suffers this problems. Opera and Internet Explorer looks perfect, and also all the others applications installed.
Clear Type option is activated, and works perfectly.
The only way to solve the probleme is to reboot firefox and execute in safe mode.
I have no extensions nor personal preferences (bookmarks either). I've just uninstalled Firefox with all personal data and reinstalled. And the issue stays.
In safe mode all looks perfectly.
I'm running windows 7 64bits
Graphics: RADEON HD 6950

I did a test using Chunk and a few other fonts that are similar plus one I know works well and the fonts that are similar to Chunk tend to look very pixelated when viewed in Firefox. Look fine in Chrome and Explorer...
This might be something that the techs at Adobe (Type Kit) would have to look at.
I posted an image, but not sure if it shows the problem that well.

Fonts went strange after system upgrade

After 'pacman -Syu' i rebooted and my fonts started looking strange, kinda bigger.
In some places its not even noticeable but again in other places it is x(.
I'm using Flubox as a WM and i really don't think this has anything to do with the WM.
I was wondering if anyone else experienced some similar problems after this upgrade?
Upgrade log:
[2009-11-01 14:09] synchronizing package lists
[2009-11-01 14:09] starting full system upgrade
[2009-11-01 14:18] removed gnome-mount (0.8-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded kernel-headers (2.6.30.5-1 -> 2.6.31.4-2)
[2009-11-01 14:18] Generating locales...
[2009-11-01 14:18] en_US.UTF-8... done
[2009-11-01 14:18] en_US.ISO-8859-1... done
[2009-11-01 14:18] Generation complete.
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded glibc (2.10.1-4 -> 2.10.1-5)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded attr (2.4.43-1 -> 2.4.44-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded acl (2.2.47-2 -> 2.2.48-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libdrm (2.4.13-1 -> 2.4.15-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libx11 (1.2.2-1 -> 1.3.2-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded xextproto (7.0.5-1 -> 7.1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libxext (1.0.5-2 -> 1.1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libxxf86vm (1.0.99.1-1 -> 1.1.0-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded fixesproto (4.0-3 -> 4.1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libxfixes (4.0.3-2 -> 4.0.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libxdamage (1.1.1-2 -> 1.1.2-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libgl (7.5.1-2 -> 7.6-2)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded ati-dri (7.5.1-2 -> 7.6-2)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded binutils (2.19.1-5 -> 2.20-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded dbus-glib (0.82-1 -> 0.82-2)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded enca (1.11-1 -> 1.12-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded gcc-libs (4.4.1-1 -> 4.4.2-2)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded libxt (1.0.6-1 -> 1.0.7-1)
[2009-11-01 14:18] upgraded xulrunner (1.9.1.3-2 -> 1.9.1.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded firefox (3.5.3-1 -> 3.5.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gcc (4.4.1-1 -> 4.4.2-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gnome-disk-utility (2.28.0-1 -> 2.28.0-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gnutls (2.8.3-1 -> 2.8.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gstreamer0.10 (0.10.24-1 -> 0.10.25-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxv (1.0.4-1 -> 1.0.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gstreamer0.10-base (0.10.24-1 -> 0.10.25-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libtheora (1.0-1 -> 1.1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gstreamer0.10-base-plugins (0.10.24-1 -> 0.10.25-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gstreamer0.10-ffmpeg (0.10.8-1 -> 0.10.9-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded gstreamer0.10-python (0.10.16-1 -> 0.10.17-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded inputproto (1.5.1-2 -> 2.0-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libmpcdec (1.2.6-1 -> 1.2.6-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded k3b (1.66.0alpha2-3 -> 1.68.0alpha3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libatasmart (0.16-1 -> 0.17-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libdmx (1.0.99.1-1 -> 1.1.0-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libgksu (2.0.8-1 -> 2.0.12-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libgphoto2 (2.4.6-3 -> 2.4.7-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libgsf (1.14.15-1 -> 1.14.16-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libsexy (0.1.11-1 -> 0.1.11-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libusb1 (1.0.1-1 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxmu (1.0.4-2 -> 1.0.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxpm (3.5.7-2 -> 3.5.8-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxaw (1.0.6-1 -> 1.0.7-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxcomposite (0.4.0-2 -> 0.4.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxdmcp (1.0.2-2 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxfont (1.4.0-1 -> 1.4.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxfontcache (1.0.4-2 -> 1.0.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded renderproto (0.9.3-2 -> 0.11-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxrender (0.9.4-2 -> 0.9.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxft (2.1.13-1 -> 2.1.14-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxi (1.2.1-1 -> 1.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxinerama (1.0.99.1-1 -> 1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxkbfile (1.0.5-1 -> 1.0.6-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxres (1.0.3-2 -> 1.0.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxtst (1.0.3-2 -> 1.1.0-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxvmc (1.0.4-2 -> 1.0.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxxf86dga (1.1.1-0.1 -> 1.1.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded libxxf86misc (1.0.1-2 -> 1.0.2-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded live-media (2009.09.28-1 -> 2009.09.28-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded mesa (7.5.1-2 -> 7.6-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded nautilus (2.28.0-1 -> 2.28.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded nautilus-cd-burner (2.24.0-2 -> 2.25.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded ntfs-3g (2009.4.4-1 -> 2009.4.4-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded openssh (5.3p1-1 -> 5.3p1-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded putty (0.60-1 -> 0.60-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded python-gdata (1.3.1-1 -> 2.0.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded shared-mime-info (0.70-1 -> 0.70-2)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded totem (2.28.1-1 -> 2.28.2-1)
[2009-11-01 14:19] upgraded xorg-font-utils (7.4-3 -> 7.5-2)
[2009-11-01 14:20] Updating font cache... done.
[2009-11-01 14:20] installed ttf-freefont (20090104-2)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded vlc (1.0.2-3 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded vte (0.22.2-1 -> 0.22.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xf86-input-evdev (2.2.5-1 -> 2.3.0-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xf86-video-ati (6.12.4-1 -> 6.12.99.git20091014-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xf86-video-vesa (2.2.0-1 -> 2.2.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-apps (7.5-1.1 -> 7.5-2)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-fonts-alias (1.0.1-2 -> 1.0.2-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] Regenerating font encodings... done.
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-fonts-encodings (1.0.2-3 -> 1.0.3-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] installed printproto (1.0.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] installed libxp (1.0.0-3)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-server-utils (7.4-7 -> 7.5-2)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-server (1.6.3.901-1 -> 1.7.1-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-utils (7.4-4 -> 7.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-xauth (1.0.3-1 -> 1.0.4-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xorg-xkb-utils (7.4-2 -> 7.5-1)
[2009-11-01 14:20] upgraded xterm (246-1 -> 250-1)
I tried clearing the font cache but it didin't help.
Any ideas?

I'm having a similar issue. Only difference is that fonts looks smaller than before the upgrade.
I don't think this has something to do with KMS, because that update was a week ago an no problem was detected. This small fonts issue is probably related to recent updates on xorg- stuff.
Moreover, the strange thing here is that only GUIs fonts got smaller. Fonts on firefox (the webpage, not the user interface) looks exactly the same as before.
What should we do?

[Solved]Xfce fonts look strange in Terminal

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for