Some POs are not generated in the backend system

Hi,
we've implemented SAP SRM 5.5. in a Classic Extended Scenario with SAP R/3 as the backend system.
Recently we are facing a problem related to some Purchase Orders. If they have some wrong information for the backend system, they do not get the "Error in process" status but the are put in the "Ordered" status even though they are not replicated in SAP R/3.
This problems occurs only with some POs and only (for as much as we could see) if the PO has been generated from an Offer (S.C.->Bid Invitation->Offer->PO).
Could you please help me out with this issue? I can't understand why this is happening...
Thanks a lot for your precious advices!
Giovanni

Hi Sanjeev,
thanks for your quick reply. I've checked the RZ20 and there's an error message related to the Header Data. I've checked also the PO from BBP_PD and I could see that in table BBP_PDIGP the EP subtype is missing. If I force it and then I transfer the PO again, everything is fine.
I can't understand why this is happening. I've never had any problems like that with other POs created straight out of a S.C.. The issue is related only with POs created out of a Bid.
Please, let me know if you have an idea.
Have a nice day!
Giovanni

Similar Messages

Some POs are not sent to supplier via email

Hello all,
During the PO ordering to supplier via email, some POs are not sent to the supplier.
the document output status is in incorrectly processed in the table PPFTTRIGG.
Pls help me with any standard job is available to execute this incorrectly processed PO outputs.
Regards
Madhan

Hello Maddan,
If some of your action status have errors occured during processing, you cannot re-process PO edition: you have first to identify what was the error.
So, get the application keys (PO number) from table PPFTTRIGG for which status is "2". Then, check in transactional what is exactly the error for each PO concerned.
Regards.
Laurent.

Changes on equipment are not saved at the backend (MAM30_031)

Hi,
if I change some equipment data e.g. street and city on the client, this changes are not done at the equipment in the backend. Status of MAM30_031 is I-Finished which holds the correct changed data inside. But if I now look into the equipment at the backend, there's still the old data. Changes done at the backend are synchronized fine to the client, but not the other way.
Any idea why this doesn't work?
Thank you and regards,
Florian

Hi Florian,
here is what I would do:
1. Check in "O-Sent" in a sequence which is a response for the change in equipment what is the status of your change. There should be something like, "All top updated successfully...", or "Conflict...", or "BAPI return...". That will give you and idea what happens with your change.
2. If you "Successful"... message or no message - that is garanteed BAPI problem. You should open OSS message to SAP (component XAP-MBA-MAM).
Which version of MAM3.0 SR3 you are running? There is Patch02 which I know for sure has some fixes for technical object change fucntionality. (If you are on the lower version: reintsallation will be required, there are SynBo changes either in Patch01, or Patch02, don't remember exactly which).
Cheers,
Larissa Limarova

Some images are not appeared on the JButton

Hi all
I want to appear an ImageIcon on my JButton
Some images are appeared on the button when run the code,
but some images are not and the button appeared as a default
button why ?
the problem in my code in this statement
JButton   merc = new JButton (new ImageIcon(" door.jpg " ));Thanks in advance.

I suggest that you break down your statements even further to see where the problem is.
So if this the problem is on this line:
JButton   merc = new JButton (new ImageIcon("door.jpg" )); //string corrected?try to break it up a bit like so:
JButton merc = new JButton();
File imageFile = new File("door.jpg");
if (imageFile.exists())
   ImageIcon icon = new ImageIcon(imageFile);
   if (icon != null)
      merc.setIcon(icon);
   else
      System.out.println("icon == null");
else
   System.out.println("image file doesn't exist");
}

Goods Receipt not transferred to the Backend System R/3

We are currently using BBPCRM4.0 & SAP R/3 4.7 (extended scenario)
For a particular Purchase Order which has a material number, We cannot transfer GR to the Backend System R/3 successfully.(The shopping cart of unsuccessfully transferred GR is created by using material)
When I check R/3 using WE05, I can find the message "The plant data of the material G09002202 is locked by the user MRP_RFC". This must be the reason why GR is not transferred successfully to the Backend System, but I do not know what this message mean.(As you see, MRP_RFC is the user name that connects SRM and R/3. + That moment the material is not locked by any user in R/3)
If we try to create the GR document again in SRM, the message "Item is already being processed" is shown, so cannot make BUS2203 Docs.
To sort out this, we remove the GR Transfer Error Information in
BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB.
After removing the information of this error in BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, surprisingly we can make GR successfully.
Weird!.
Only for a particular PO which has a material, but not everytime.
Sometimes this problem happens.
At the first time, it doesn't work, but after removing the data from BBP_DOCUMENT_TAB, when we try GR again it works.
Could you help me why this symptom happends..?
Edited by: Hyangsook Moon on Feb 28, 2008 6:44 AM

Hi Hyangsook Moon,
The system is allowing you to create Confirmation again in SRM because the status is not yet updated in SRM since the G.R is not created in the backend successfully.
Since the confirmation is created in SRM and could not able to create G.R in R/3 through IDOC the system is giving you message as " Document is being processed".
So the system is allowing you to create confirmation again once you delete the table entry.
Hope this makes you more clear.Clarifications are welcome.
Award points for helpful answers.
Rgds,
Teja

Users are created but Roles are not Provisioned in the Target System

Hi,
It would be great if somebody would provided solution to my problem. The problem is when I try to create the Users in Identity Managment UI then the Users are created in the Target systems but the Roles are not provisioned to the Users.
In the provisioning job SetABAPRole&ProfileForUser,
It is says In the Error putNextEntry failed storing
Exception from Modify operation:com.sap.idm.ic.ToPassException: User does not exist
MSKEY 58437
Please note the When we create the User, the user is created however the Roles is not provisioned to the user.
Regards,
Hakim

Hello Nits,
since this thread is from 2010 and the OP was logged on last in 2012 (as you can see in the profile), I don't think you'll get an answer here.
Please create a new thread to explain your problem (with version and SP numbers, logs etc). You can add a link to this thread to show, that the problem is similar.
Regards,
Steffi.

Some interfaces are not shown in the sxmb_moni

Hi all,
We are facing the following scenario: we have one interface in XG1 (development environment) which is very simple: it consists of a sender File and a receiver IDOC. The file format has been double checked and apparently is what XI defines but when we execute, we can not see anything in the sxmb_moni and if we look into the adapter monitor -> file adapter, we can see that the sender seems to execute successfully but the receiver still shows the following: no message processing until now. So no IDOC is generated and no xml message can be seen in the TCODE sxmb_moni.
Also we have some interfaces that has file receivers and we have the same problems. So, for any reason, the receivers are not working properly. I have refreshed CPACache but the error persists.
It is preventing a whole team of doing some tests and as the golive date (March-April) is approaching it is impacting us in a strong way.
Could you please give us some support?
XIAFUSER is getting locked periodically (i see it in the SLD user management), do you think it will be the main reason of this?
Thanks in advance and kind regards

Hi,
Go to Tcode SXI_CACHE for refreshing the Directory Caches. Go to Adapter Engine link and refresh the same
Go thru following threads may be useful.
Message not seen in SXMB_MOni
Missing Messages - in RWB but not sxmb_moni
For Adapter Engine you can do as below.
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=full|delta
In addition to above..
Go thru following link about Processed XML messages.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c4/9a5c3bab977239e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Just add on info.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/6baeae38391a6ee10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Moorthy

Some Programmes are NOT responding all the time.

Hi I have had a clean sweep of my computer and just recently some programmes such as Skype and WebplusX5 are not responding. This isnt just a one off thing it happens all the time. I was wondering if anybody could help me into finding a solution.
Thanks

Hi I have had a clean sweep of my computer and just recently some programmes such as Skype and WebplusX5 are not responding. This isnt just a one off thing it happens all the time. I was wondering if anybody could help me into finding a solution.
Thanks
My Specs for my PC are: 16GB Ram, 4.2Ghz AMD FX-4170 and my system type is: 32Bit Windows 7 OEM

Some Apps are not shown in the Appstore

I just updatet my Iphone to firmware 5.0.1.
Now some Apps aren't shown in the Appstore
For Example Whatsapp
What can i do now?

Hi,
Go to Tcode SXI_CACHE for refreshing the Directory Caches. Go to Adapter Engine link and refresh the same
Go thru following threads may be useful.
Message not seen in SXMB_MOni
Missing Messages - in RWB but not sxmb_moni
For Adapter Engine you can do as below.
http://<host>:<port>/CPACache/refresh?mode=full|delta
In addition to above..
Go thru following link about Processed XML messages.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/c4/9a5c3bab977239e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Just add on info.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/6baeae38391a6ee10000000a11466f/frameset.htm
Hope this helps..
Regards,
Moorthy

Cascading Style Sheets are NOT written to the file system

Hallo,
On the "Cascading Style Sheets" page is written that: "The Cascading Style Sheets are written to the file system, so you can reference them in your HTML source code."
I am true that if this works I can reference the css with something like this?
<link rel="stylesheet" href="/i/sample.css" type="text/css">
and do not need this style:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="#APP_IMAGES#sample.css" type="text/css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="#WORKSPACE_IMAGES#sample.css" type="text/css">
I have looked on the "Cascading Style Sheets" page: http://127.0.0.1:7780/apex/f?p=4000:37
Are there some other preferences, options, etc. to set that this will be working?
Thx for your help. Willi

Hi,
CSS files uploaded through Shared Components, Cascading Style Sheets are written into the database, so you would have to use:
<link rel="stylesheet" href="#WORKSPACE_IMAGES#sample.css" type="text/css"/>You should be able to see these if you run the following in SQL Commands:
SELECT * FROM APEX_APPLICATION_FILES
WHERE UPPER(FILENAME) LIKE '%CSS%'Andy

Since upgrading to 3.6.15 some settings are not saved, and the alerts when changing between encrypted content are totally out of synch to the actually occurence

The settings dialog box cuts off the bottom ofthe box content as it seems to be having problems with font rendering.
Settings such as "Show download window" and "Ask me where to save" apparently revert to defaults rather than saving the settings.
The encrypted content alerts are out of synch. They claim to be going from encrypted to non-encrypted when neither page is encrypted. Or warn of non-encrypted content on an encrypted page when the whole page is unencrypted.
3.6.14 had none of these problems.

Update to 3.6.16 has fixed this problem.

Few POs are not sent to supplier via email

Hello all,
During the PO ordering to supplier via email, some POs are not sent to the supplier may be due to object lock (temporary isue).
The document output status (2) is in incorrectly processed in the table PPFTTRIGG.
Pls help me with the parameter to be filled in the report "RSPPFPROCESS" so that i can create a variant and schedule daily.
Regards
Madhan

Hello Maddan,
If some of your action status have errors occured during processing, you cannot re-process PO edition: you have first to identify what was the error.
So, get the application keys (PO number) from table PPFTTRIGG for which status is "2". Then, check in transactional what is exactly the error for each PO concerned.
Regards.
Laurent.

Limit PO price changes are not replicated to ECC backend

Hi all,
SRM 5.0 ECS SP13.
When I change the value(increase/decrease) in limt PO which is already created(PO is changed for first time) and order the PO,under Overview screen.,the PO total value(at header level) shows the correct changed /new value while at the Item level,the Net price is shown as the old value!However when I go and check the item details,the field "VALUE" and "EXPECTED VALUE" have the changed/new value.
Because of the above issue,the PO changes are not replicated to ECC backend system.When I tested the BAPI BAPI_PO_CHANGE1 with the test data,there is no error mesasge in ECC backend system.
After this,when I change the PO for second time(again value increase/descrease),the total value and net price is shown correctly in SRM and changes are also replicated to ECC backend system!
I have also checked the cong for SPOOLPARAMETERS under Set Control Parameters and eveything is set correctly as shown below
SPOOL_JOB_USER     User that execueds spool job.     CUA_ADMIN
SPOOL_LEAD_INTERVAL     intervall by which the retrytime incr.     60
SPOOL_MAX_RETRY     Max. number of retrys for writing BAPIS     10
Can someone throw some pointers how to resolve the above issue.
Thanks in advance.

Hi
can you recreate the same issue
are you saying that
1. create a limit po for 100 USD and replicated to ECC AS 100 USD total value.
2 . now update the PO in SRM 150 USD and it was not replicated to ECC ?
or
1. limit sc
2. Limit PO
3. update not reached ECC.
Note 1284361 - Limits not transferred to backend purchase order
Symptom
Extended classic scenario.
You have ordered a purchase order with more than one hierarchy item containing a limit.The purchase order is created or updated in the backend system without errors but the limits are missing in the backend purchase order.

Processed Dimension IDs not saving in the backend server

Hi Experts,
After successfully processing dimensions, the newly added dimension IDs or the changed dimensions are not reflecting in the backend BI server. And naturally not in the Office client.
I have checked logs in SLG1, couldnt find issue. Checked dumps, nothing particular found.
Checked the .NET server as well, no problems.
We are on SAP BPC 7.5 NW SP09.
Any idea why this could be happening?
Best Regards,
Sayan

Hi Sabine,
I checked the log files earlier itself on the server but they didnot help. Last updates in the files were from November.
What i have found today is, after i tried to process the dimensions for mutiple times, they finally got processed in the backend as well. I was checking in SM66, every time processes were triggered for BPC_ADMIN in the backend, when i started processing.
But when i went to SLG1, there were entries with grey status (not processed) for same master data object and subobject 'master data update'. Since they are dialog process i could not any further entry from where i could find why they were not processing.
Any idea? Thanks again for your patience with the responses
Best Regards,
Sayan

When keynote presentation is emailed as a keynote file, the original sizing of texts and slide layout is incongruent with the original. Text is written over text. Some text is not included on the slide. The sizing done in the original creation isn't maint

When keynote presentation is sent via email as a keynote file, original sizing and spacing on slide is not retained in the email. Some words are not fitted onto the slide, others words are written over each other. The effort to create the optimal layout on the original is not retained. Please offer your insights into my errors. Thanks in advance.

Wauw... I'm always impressed by how bad Microsoft can answer these questions!
Dear Martin - Now let me do it short:
Adding text-shadow to p-tags (especially) in IE10, and you want to positioning your shadow by ex. 1px 1px 1px rgba(255, 255, 255, .5); it cuts the text (or make some part of your text invisible!). The issue is the blur-value! Set the blur-value to 0 or 5
- not in between, because it then starts cutting your text (has something to do with the combination of the lengths and the size of the blur-size, and probably also the size of your text)!
Instead of the example I just gave you, try this: text-shadow: 0px 1px 0px rgba(255, 255, 255, .5);
And Microsoft - please try and make an effort when people are writing you with bugs or issues in IE... You must know that your browser (all versions) has been and still are the ones with most bugs! If you wanna learn about the CSS-terms, you can go look
at http://www.w3schools.com/css/ or try Google it ;O)

Some POs are not generated in the backend system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for