Sony 46 inch t Bravia 1920 X 1080 1080P

I am trying to find the settings for 1920 X 1080. I was told that it exists. I have gone to system settings for displays and the desired resolution is not there.

By what interface are the mini and TV connected? How is the TV identified within Dipslays preferences? What resolutions are offered as choices?
Need more information than you have provided in order to help.

Similar Messages

  • Is the LG 22EN33S-B 22-inch LED 1920 x 1080 VGA Monitor compatible with mac via a vga to thunderbolt connection

    Is the LG 22EN33S-B 22-inch LED 1920 x 1080 VGA Monitor compatible with mac via a vga to thunderbolt adapter?

    The 1080p and 1080i options only appear on the HDMI display settings, the display settings for the thunderbolt to vga adaptor has 1920 x 1080.
    Via the HDMI output of the Mini via an HDMI cable to a HDMI input on the Samsung the display fills the screen but the text looks vile.
    The options for picture adjustement on the samsung include fill screen as you suggest
    Using the thunderbolt to VGA adaptor the text looks as it should, crisp and clear but the display is shitfted to the right.
    The options for picture adjustment on the Samsung does not have the 'fill screen' option available when the VGA input is selected. However a new option called 'pc screen adjustment' appears and you can nudge the display over to the left a bit but not enough to cover the whole screen.
    I remind you the pc worked perfectly 1920 x 1080 on the same VGA cable and input to the samsung.

  • What sequence setting would you use to edit 1280 x1080 DVCProHD (P2) and 1920 x 1080 AVCHD (Sony) in FCP. Experiencing Quality and rendering issues.

    What sequence setting would you use to edit both 1280 x1080 DVCProHD (P2) and 1920 x 1080 AVCHD (Sony) in a single timeline in FCP. I'm experiencing quality and rendering issues.  I've tried numerous settings but can't seem to figure this one out.  Thanks for your assistance.

    Although you can combine the avchd 1920x1080 material with prores 1920x1080 in the same timeline, you might land up saving time just converting everything to 1920x1080 prores 422.   You'd probably reduce the amount of rendering while you're working and exporting when you're done by a great deal.  This workflow will require much more drive space.

  • Satellite P75/P70 - is RGB output 1920 x 1080 ?

    Hi
    I know the  HDMI  Port on my Toshiba Satellite will output video at  Full HD.
    My questions is:-
    =>  does the  RGB  Port on my Toshiba Satellite  P75/P70  output video at  Full  HD  Resolution  1920 x 1080  ?
    and if yes
    =>  does the RGB Port  also support the higher  1900 x 1200 Resolution  ?
    Thanks,
    Ben

    Hi dbertoli
    Thanks for taking the time to help.
    What I need to do is to run the Laptop Screen  plus   2 x 24"  External Displays   and  run all  3  screens in Windows Extended Desktop mode.
    This way I can move open Windows around to differnet areas of all  3  screens  ie:  all  3  screens will be showing different things.
    As such, a HDMI splitter wont help because all it will do is  " duplicate "  the same thing across however many screens it is connected to.
    Matrox offer their  Dual2Go  boxes  which  *can*  do what I want, but I have used them before and there is noticable video lag along with a significant drain on o/s resources.
    The  best / perfect way to do it is   *nativley*  ie:  Laptop Screen + HDMI Output + VGA  [ RGB ? ]  Output.
    From your  VGA Wiki link, it confirms that:-
    " ... Today, the VGA analog interface is used for high definition video including 1080p and higher ..... "
    So .... the missing pieces of information from Toshiba are:-
    => is their  RGB  port  the same as a standard VGA port ?
    [  the fact that for some weird reason Toshiba call their port an RGB port  ( ie: Red Green Blue Port  )  and  *not*  a  VGA port *may* actually suggest it is not actually the same as a full-resolution VGA port  ]
    => what resolutions does their RGB port support  ?
    This is normally very basic fundumental information published in the specs for any machine.
    For some reason, Toshiba have chosen  *not*  to publish this information anywhere - or at least anywhere I can find.
    Hence I am hoping a Toshiba User or Representaitve here can confirm one way or the other.
    Ben

  • 1920 x 1080

    I've been looking through old posts on here and one of them seems to be saying that FCE 4 cannot accept 1920 x 1080, only 1440 x 1080. Is that right?
    Thanks
    Richard

    The limitation isn't actually in the AIC codec btw.
    When I capture my 1920 x 1080i footage from my Sony HDR-SR12E it produces an AIC file with true 1920 x 1080 in the capture folder (shown with Quicktime Movie Inspector).
    In FCE you cannot inscrease the sequence frame size from 1440 x 1080 though so it always renders to 1440 x 1080 (and you can see this on the render files produced through Quicktime Movie inspector).
    Also note, there are known issues with capturing this kind of footage from some cameras (there is an artical on Canon cameras on the Apple support site).
    Final note, if your footage is captured at 1920 x 1080i FCE will insist on rendering everything that you use.
    Regards,
    -Andy

  • Why are there no 1920 X 1080 Choices in the Sequence settings

    I watched some videos trying to understand what is the best speed and frame size to use when creating a video.  Basically Lynda.com they are saying 1920 X 1080 is full resolution and this is the desirable setting for outputting best resolution.  The aspect ratio for this is 56%.
    Also they explained the best speeds for the type of output you plan to make.  So from this I naturally expected to find a High definition 1920 X 1080 setting as a choice in setting up a new Sequence in Premier Pro.  Wrong!  To my surprise there is only one choice that will give you these setting right out of the box, What's up with the settings choices.  The recommended setting should be right there and easy to find.  Below I show the choice of AVCHD is the only obvious choice for creating a 1920 X 1080 video.  Can you guys help?

    Just to toss in my two cents worth - I don't believe any DSLR shoots 1080i, should all be progressive as 1080p or 720p. And back to the "HDV" or "Anamorphic HD" thing - with square pixels (1.0 Pixel Aspect Ratio) 1080i/p is 1920x1080 and if you divide each side of that by 120, you get 16 and 9. A 16:9 ratio between width and height (not 56% or 1.7777777 !!!!). "Anamorphic" widescreen is a way of "faking it", and saving a smaller file since less data is involved. That is how HDV works. It uses 1440x1080 pixels, and they are not square, rather they are rectangular with a 1.333 pixel aspect ratio. The pixels are wider than they are tall, and that makes up the difference so that it still plays back looking like 16:9 (IF the player respects the PAR). Simple math shows that 1440 x 1.333 = 1920! So 1440x1080 with 1.333 PAR "looks" the same as 1920x1080 with 1.0 PAR, even though 1440x1080 comes out to 4:3. Which brings up the last point, if anyone IS editing HDV footage, and wants to export to say YouTube or other other computer/tablet playback formats, do NOT export as 1440x1080 because most players will not pay attention to the PAR and the video will look like 4:3 (players wrongly assume 1.0 PAR). You will want to export as 1920x1080 with 1.0 PAR and then all is right with the world. Or take it down to 720p at 1280x720, also 16:9 with 1.0 PAR for correct playback.
    Thanks for reading and good night ;-)
    Jeff

  • How to make the templates in PAL to 1920 x 1080 ?

    Hi there,
    I did FILE > OPEN TEMPLATE.
    When I was doing projects in Std Def, I select PAL, and there were a lot of templates available in PAL.
    But now doing projects in HD, these templates in PAL are too small to superimpose onto the HD videos (in 1920 x 1080).
    How to make these templates in 1920 x 1080 ?
    Thank you

    Ian R. Brown wrote:
    I think you are making a big issue of something very simple as it took me less than a minute to test it out.
    Make your template or whatever in LT and then select File>Render Movie and make sure that the "Render Background" box is ticked.
    Put resulting file in FCE and stretch it as I described earlier.
    That's it!
    If you don't want your text stretching, you can leave it off the LT movie and add it from FCE's Text functions . . . . . or you could make just the text in LT and add it on a track above the template in FCE.
    You need to do some quick experiments (tests) to see how it works for you.
    Incidentally, are these third party templates?
    If so, you should contact the supplier to see if they have included some HD versions somewhere.
    Thanks Ian,
    The reason I am asking is bcos I cannot experiment with it as I am not at home. I don't have a Mac with me.
    I was hoping that FCE can import as ipr so that I do not have to render each time I make changes.
    These templates are extension packs from 12 inch. Dont think they have HD version
    Cheers

  • Does iMovie'08 import 1920 x 1080 at 1440 x 1080

    After some thought the subject (Sony HDR SR11 resolution) of my last post yesterday may include all HD camcorders with 1920 x 1080 resolution. when iMovie'08 imports the files they are saved as quicktime movies. When played in quicktime and the details looked at in Movie Inspector (quicktime/window/show movie inspector) the format is shown as Apple Intermediate Codec 1440 x 1080,
    Does iMovie'08 import 1920 x 1080 at 1440 x 1080 and then output it at 1920 x 1080 ?

    Hi(Bonjour)!
    Look at this very interesting link about H.264 CODEC and web compression:
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/qt_h-264_moviesfcp.html
    As WEB involves many compression and smaller frame sizes, the quality will be on par for both formats.
    iDVD will accept HD sequences movies from FCE but it will convert them to standard definition as it cannot output (authoring and burning) high def blu-ray DVD.
    Look at this link (altough you don't have ProRes codec with FCE package...) about HDV limitation for DVD usage:
    http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/hdv_timeline_to_sddvd.html
    Michel Boissonneault

  • Burning AVCHD footage in full HD (1920 X 1080)?

    I am trying to burn AVCHD footage (taken with a SONY CX7) imported in Full HD in iMovie 08. I would like to burn in Full HD (1920 X 1080) so that I can play the results on a Bluray player. My choices with Mac and iMovie 08 seem limited to 960 X 540. On a PC and using SONY Motion Picure Browser I can burn in Full HD easily. Should I not be able to do the same with iMovie 08? I am new to iMovie, I love the interface and the very smooth scene transitions (compared to XP and SONY MPB) but so far the better resolution of XP/MPB generated footage really makes a difference when viewed on a 46" LCD monitor. Is there a solution?
    Louis

    latan -
    This is the 'gotcha' that got me and for over a week no one responded to my exact question you are asking...I'll save you the grief of asking this same question repeated times on several different Mac forums. After over a week of investigating, reading and learning more about HD video, I realized that iMovie only allows you edit, not burn.
    Burning is done through iDVD and iDVD DOES NOT BURN HIGH DEF VIDEO.....PERIOD....or specifically, does not "author" HD video.
    When you export to iDVD, it will only encode/transcode/convert (what ever you want to call it) into standard DVD format...aka for 480p/i playback. Kind of a bummer and almost useless to 'support' HD video if you can't produce a high def video for distribution...after all, that's the whole hook with the iLife suite....right?
    After some more investigation I found a few interesting solutions.
    1.) Roxio Toast.
    --> According to the product information. It allows you to burn videos to BluRay. However, I'm still trying to figure out if that means "produces" bluray content or just allows you to burn an already-made composition to BluRay disk.
    2.) DVD Studio Pro 4
    --> DSP 4 can take several different video formats/resolution and author them into an HD DVD format.
    However, this is a pro-level application and far too complicated and expensive for just HD burning.
    3.) MovieFactory 6 Plus for Windows
    --> MF 6+ can actually take your HD video and burn an HD DVD or BluRay format disk onto a standard DVD or DVD DL that will play in either type of player (depending on format). About 40 - 45 minutes of HD video will fit on a DL disk.
    However, since this is a Windows program, you'd also have to run Parallels or some other Windows virtualization to run it. I don't know if MF6+ is compatable with AVCHD format.
    Of course, any of these options would require you to have a high-def capable player (hd-dvd or bluray player). Possibly a cheaper option is a used mac-mini connected to your TV and use it as a media server. Just copy the files over to the mini and use it as a player.

  • See if I'm doing this correctly - Starting create an HD 1920 X 1080 Slidesh

    Hello All;
    I'm new to FCP and am using FCP 6 from Final Cut Studio. I need to create a High definition Slideshow that will be shown on both a computer screen and a TV.
    After opening FCP, I select NEW PROJECT and then New Sequence. Then I Then from the sequence menu, I select settings and in there select a frame size of 1920 X 1080 HDV 1080i.
    My photos are at a resultion of 3008 X 2000. Then I import these into the timeline.
    Two questions - First, is this the basic way to set up a HDV video project, and second, will the photos (Which are a higher resolution than HD), scale to fit the screen without changing the aspect ratio ? It looks like it's working correctly but before I get too far, I thought I'd ask the forum. Thanks.
    Tim

    Should I do a custom frame size and set it to 1920 X 1080. Then, select ProRes 422 for the codec ?
    You choose the ProRes 422 EASY SETUP. This adjusts everything. Make a new sequence and that sequence will have those settings.
    Would I set the Pixel Aspect Ratio to square and the field dominance to none ?
    Well, ProRes 422, if you choose a 1080p setting, will have no field dominance and is square pixel.
    I also want to create a smaller DV version for playback on a TV.
    You will compress the master to a smaller format when you are done...with Compressor.
    Shane

  • Cant import 1920 x 1080

    I have just shot some footage with 2 x HDCAM EX3's and for the first time shot in 1080i 50 and am now trouble bringing that format into FCP via the transfer software. It comes across as 1440 x 1080i using the Apple HDV 1080i50 codec and I can not seem to change this. In the project bins of FCP it appears as 1440 x 1080i at 3.2Mbps. I believe it stills shoots at 1920 x 1080 and 25Mbps.
    Any suggestions?

    Yes, use the sony xdcam transfer application that Sony delivers with the camera.. This software performs no conversion but simply rewraps the files as quicktime files. I've never actually used the plug in.
    The application functions completely independently of FCP. I put the sticks into my macbook pro and use the application to do the transfer. Then I simply import them into FCP. I've also called it from within FCP, under the import submenu, and then placed them directly into the bins I want them to show up in.

  • AVCHD / 60p / 1920 x 1080

    Greetings,
    I am using a Canon R42 Camcorder.
    (1) What is the advantage to recording in AVCHD, 60p, 1920 x 1080 for Vimeo, YouTube, etc? Any advantage at all? Under what circumstances would you record at those settings? I am going to assume if the final intent is to burn to Blue Ray but am not sure.
    (2) When starting Premier Pro one can select either 'DV' or 'HDV'. I assume that latter is for 1920 x 1080 output?
    (3) I am using the Trial Version of Premier Pro and am confused as to what benifits are gained by this being tied into CC?
    As always, thank you very much.
    Ron

    To add just a little bit to Jeff's well worded response...
    There are a few "cloud" features in the Creative Cloud. If you consider the 20GB storage, and the web based Behance and Prosite features. But no, they really should not have used "Cloud" because it has caused them more trouble than it is worth, I think.
    But as you have heard, the processing is on your computer. In fact, I really wish I could set up two or more computers locally to process video, but Premiere Pro does not support render farms. Not yet.
    On the subject of video...
    I like shooting 60p but there are disadvantages. Let's take my camera for example. I shoot with the Panasonic DMC-GH3.
    When I shoot at 60p I can't use the Extended Teleconverter. That is a feature that causes the camera to just use the 1920X1080 pixels in the center of the sensor when shooting video. What that means is that instead of using the entire sensor and then scaling it down to fit the 1080p standard, the camera just shoots with the pixels it needs. So everything looks 2.6 times closer. I was shooting boats on the water today and I used it for the first time. I was shooting things almost full frame that I could barely see with my naked eye. Pretty cool. But I had to shoot 30p or 24p to do that.
    Let's talk about quality of the video, based in part on compression. If I shoot 60 frames per second and store it at 50Mb/s then the compression is twice what it is when I shoot 30p and store it at 50Mb/s. I get even higher quality by compressing it less when I shoot 24p at 50Mb/s. Make sense, right?  When I bought the camera I thought I would be shooting 24p all-intra, which while it is easy on the PC, has to store a lot more information because every frame has all of the information instead of some of them just storing the changes from the key frame. So storing it at 72Mb/s is still compressing it more than standard 24p at 50Mb/s.
    Now, I have to say I don't really see the difference, but I haven't stressed the quality of the image in my editing workflow either. Not yet anyway. If I was going to use a Digital Intermediate, I would stick to the method that compresses my video the least.
    Keep in mind that there are a lot of people who swear that 24p is more "film like" due to the motion blur and movement. I find it hard to disagree with them. I want to, but it appears that 24p is less "real" and makes it easier to suspend disbelief. People can get lost in the story. When people see 30fps or 60fps they complain that it is too real. They are used to seeing their TV news that way, not their movies. They can't see fantasy at the same quality and motion attributes as they see their news. Not yet anyway. Gamers who play at even higher frame rates may eventually take over the world, but apparently "The Hobbit" at 48fps annoyed a LOT of purists.

  • 1920 x 1080 to a DVD

    I have been using standard definition cameras at the school I teach at. We recently updated to Sony HD cameras and am having problems exporting longer videos to IDVD. I have a video shot in 1920 x 1080. The video is approximately 2 hours long. I want to dump it onto a Dual Layer DVD using IDVD. I am using Final Cut Pro 7. When I export out of Final Cut the file size is almost 90 GB and it won’t fit on a DVD. Since 2 hour movies can be stored on a professional  DVD I was hoping someone can explain what  I need to do to compress this enough without losing too much quality? Do I change the capture setting to a lower quality? If so any recommendations would be appreciated.

    Unless you are exporting using QT conversion the 90GB file represents your sequence settings in FC which is most likely what you shot on the Sony Camera in this case HD.
    Be aware that unless you are creating a Blu-Ray disc at some point you (or the program you use) will be converting your 1920 (HD) footage to SD. There is no other HD options.  You can create simple Blu-Ray discs in Compressor but outside of that all Mac options (excluding Adobe Encore) are essentialy SD.
    IDVD & DVD Studio Pro (all SD DVDs) convert and/or work with MPG-2 & AC3  or uncompressed audio files. These files are either made during the build/burn process or could be made with Compressor.
    These files are considerably smaler than the export from FC. Size will be dependent on the compression settings you choose or IDVD may have a make it fit setting when you choose single or dual layer export.
    Converting your HD movie to SD before exporting from FC could also be another option.
    Another thing to be aware of:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TS2179?viewlocale=en_US

  • Screen change from 1366 x 768 to 1920 x 1080, Sllekbook-​15 b050sw

    Hi!,
    My screen is damaged and it needs a replacement. I was wandering is it possible to install full HD screen instead of original 1366 x 768 screen. I found appropriate screen (same size, 40 pin, will fit perfectly) on eBay but I'm not sure it's compatible or not due to resolution change. My laptop is Sleekbook-15 b050sw with 3rd gen Intel and HD4000 on board along with GeForce GT630M, 6GB RAM (2GB for graphics). I know that I can connect 1080p external monitor over HDMI and everything works properly.
    Thanks and regards.

    The issue is not so much the motherboard as the flex cable. 
    Your Manual
    Since no 1920 x 1080 screen was offered on your laptop we do not know if the cable will carry a full HD signal. There is no other part you can use if it does not work. So it is entirely a gamble to try it. 

  • How do you segment a long project and preserve HD 1920 x 1080 pixels at each step?

    I'm shooting video with a Canon HF S10 in the maximum quality (1920 x 1080 i) mode.  The resulting files in AVCHD format are coming into the computer and into Elements 7 okay.  The desired  Project output is BluRay.  I want to maintain the full image quality (1920 x 1080) end-to-end (lesser quality is okay on the timeline if that all that is available).  My current project is about 65 minutes long--future ones could be two hours or more.  All the 100+ trimmed clips and transitions are on the timeline.  Saving the Project file seems to work, but re-opening the Project takes a long time and doesn't always work.  Rendering this long timeline ulitimately freezes/crashes.  When the Project was much shorter, the save and reload cyle worked okay.
    Per Steve's book a work around is to break the project into pieces around 10 minutes long, render and save them to AVI files, reload and merge the AVI files into a new "Master" Project and then render the whole thing to BluRay(?).  Better yet he suggests outputing to a folder and burning the disc with other software.  But Elements does not output BluRay to a folder.  And when I experimented outputing with AVI segment files, quality dropped a lot suggesting that the 1920 x 1080 is not preserved in AVI format.
    It appears that:
         AVI files are just the DV 720 x 480 image quality of mini DV tape
         Output to a folder in BluRay image format is not available
         Elements 7 does not support breaking an HD 1920 x 1080 timeline into segments for long projects
    Any ideas will be appreciated.  Canon does supply a crude editing software package that is claimed to do simple cuts and transitions and produce a file that can be loaded back into the HF S10 memory for playback (distributing product on SD cards instead of BluRay is a novel possibility).  I'd prefer to use Elements or a similar software product that takes me start to finish without losing any pixels.
    Finally, I have a backlog of several long projects using HDV tape as a source.  I want those to go to BluRay too, but not giving up any of the 1440 x 1080 pixels.  I think the same limitations above apply to HDV.
    After waiting several years to get this end-to-end capability, it is disappointing to find it still seems to be out of reach (maybe is just hidden).
    Sometime soon, I hope Steve will write an edition that deals exclusively with the end-to-end HD (1920 x 1080) work flow including best scaling of still images, storage of image files and output to BluRay and creating slide shows using all the HD pixels (no SD compromises) again on BluRay.  That of course means Adobe may need to add some tweaks in Elements 8.
    Terry 9391
    PS, my PC is using an Intel Core 2 Quad processor, Vista OS, 4 GB of memory, has access to several TB of HD, and a couple of GB of Ready Boost memory (does this really help?) and a 1920 x 1200 monitor.

    You could export each section as 1920x1080 MPEG2 using the Share>Personal Computer>MPEG option then selecting the MPEG2 1920x1080i export Preset.
    You can also export as AVI... however this will be uncompressed AVI with a file size of over 1GB per minute... File>Export>Movie then in Settings under General>File Type select Microsoft AVI (not Microsoft DV AVI). Then in Video>Compressor select None, in Frame Size set 1920x1080 and in PixelAspect Ratio select Square Pixels.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Poor performance - QT Player and Safari

    Ok, so I've been ignoring this issue on my computer for the longest time and I think it's time I got to the bottom of it. I'm using a Quicksilver G4, 733MHz, with 896MB RAM. Now, previously, prior to upgrading to Tiger, using Panther and QT 6.5 somet

  • Reinstallation of Adobe Acrobat Standard 9.0

    I need to reinstall my Adobe Acrobat Standard 9.0, but I cant find my CD and Apparently I cant get it from the adobe.com site.  I have my serial number all i need is the software to redownload.  Any suggestions?

  • XI 7.0 passing attributes between java mapping and message mapping

    Hi all, Here's a newbie question. There is a scenario where an interface mapping has several stages of java mapping and message mapping I would like to know how to set attributes in the java mapping so that it can be accessed in a message map (or vic

  • Date parameter in a process flow

    Hi, I´m working with OWB 10.1.0.2.0. I have a process flow with a transform. The transform has a date parameter and I´ve defined a date parameter in the start activity, which is bound to the start parameter. If I try to pass a date parameter in this

  • Why is my Safari so slow

    I have recently upgraded to Tiger. Since doing so, web pages loading on Safari have slowed down drastically. Navigating from one web page to another has become painfully slow whereas it was almost instant previously (we have an excellent broadband se