Sorted Table - tabix issue

All,
I have the following code While executing system is pointing to sy-tabix, but the data I am getting in the READ statement is from last record in the internal table
report z_9699_30.
tables : eket.
types : begin of ty_eket.
        include structure eket.
types: end of ty_eket.
data: wa_eket                 type ty_eket.
data: it_eket                 like sorted table of wa_eket
                              with unique key primary_key
                              components ebeln ebelp etenr
                              with non-unique sorted key secondary_key
                              components ebeln ebelp.
parameters: p_ebeln like eket-ebeln.
parameters: p_ebelp like eket-ebelp.
select * from eket into table it_eket
      where ebeln eq p_ebeln.
      read table it_eket into wa_eket with table key secondary_key
               components ebeln = p_ebeln
                          ebelp = p_ebelp.
Please copy and execute this by giving EBELN and EBELP from EKET
Please make sure while selecting from EKET please select data of multiple records available for same EBELP ie llike
Here below PO # 4500000003 and for Item # 00030 is have multiple records
Here in selection screen by giving PO # as 4500000003 (EBELN) Item # as 00030 (EBELP) , then in the above READ statement system giving SY-TABIX as 3 but if you see the WA_EKET-ETENR is showing 2 instead of 1. This is where is the issue is
EBELN
EBELP
ETENR
Header 4
4500000003
00010
1
4500000003
00020
1
4500000003
00030
1
4500000003
00030
2

Now execute some
MOVE sy_tabix TO lv_index.
READ TABLE it_eket INTO wa_eket
INDEX lv_index USING KEY secondary_key.
BREAK-POINT.
READ TABLE it_eket INTO wa_eket
INDEX lv_index USING KEY primary_key.
BREAK-POINT.
and conclude yourself on the meaning of life index with two different keys defined...
Regards,
Raymond
PS: Reference in online help for sy-tabix now
Note that the sy-tabix system field is populated by the assigned secondary index, if sorted secondary keys are used. If this value is used for the subsequent index access to the internal table, the same table index must be explicitly used here. If used implicitly, the value would be interpreted as a primary index.

Similar Messages

How to read the data from a sorted table

Hi all,
How to read data from the sorted tables. Please provide some examples.
Thanks and regards,
Lisa

You can read like this :
DATA: BEGIN OF LINE,
COL1 TYPE I,
COL2 TYPE I,
END OF LINE.
DATA ITAB LIKE SORTED TABLE OF LINE WITH UNIQUE KEY COL1.
DO 4 TIMES.
LINE-COL1 = SY-INDEX.
LINE-COL2 = SY-INDEX ** 2.
INSERT LINE INTO TABLE ITAB.
ENDDO.
CLEAR LINE.
READ TABLE ITAB WITH TABLE KEY COL1 = 3
                INTO LINE TRANSPORTING COL2.
WRITE:   'SY-SUBRC =', SY-SUBRC,
       / 'SY-TABIX =', SY-TABIX.
SKIP.
WRITE: / LINE-COL1, LINE-COL2.

Internal table logic issue

Hi All,
I have one logical issue related to internal table manipulation.
I have one internal table :
I_DAT - This is related to Loading/Unloading of Goods.
for example with 3 fields
VSTEL, KUNNA, KMMANG.
Now suppose my data looks like this after sorting:
VSTEL KUNNA KMMANG
100 - -
200 - -
300 - -
400 - -
- 500 X
- 600 X
- 700 X
- 800 X
Here 100,200,300,400 are Loading points.
ANd 500,600,700,800 are unloading points.
Now what i want is For loading & Unloading points i need to pick up Address and print one after other.
But how they need to print is:
FOR INITIAL LOADING OF
ADDRESS- For 100
FIRST STOP: FOR LOADING OF
ADDRESS- For 200
SECOND STOP: FOR LOADING OF
ADDRESS- For 300
Etc .....
Then
FOR UNLOADING OF:
ADDRESS- For 400
FIRST STOP: FOR UNLOADING OF
etc.
FINAL STOP: FOR FINAL UNLOADING OF
We might get as many records :
Can any body give me the logic:
Printing Address is not a problem:
But Above every address we need to print FIRST STOP, SECOND etc like that.
For this i need logic.
Can anybody give the solution!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Prasad.

Try this.I think you want output like this......
DATA: BEGIN OF LINE,
 CARRID TYPE SBOOK-CARRID,
 CONNID TYPE SBOOK-CONNID,
 FLDATE TYPE SBOOK-FLDATE,
 CUSTTYPE TYPE SBOOK-CUSTTYPE,
 CLASS TYPE SBOOK-CLASS,
 BOOKID TYPE SBOOK-BOOKID,
 END OF LINE.
DATA ITAB LIKE SORTED TABLE OF LINE WITH UNIQUE KEY TABLE LINE.
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE CUSTTYPE CLASS BOOKID
 FROM SBOOK INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO LINE.
AT FIRST.
 WRITE / 'List of Bookings'.
 ULINE.
ENDAT.
 AT NEW CARRID.
 WRITE: / 'Carrid:', LINE-CARRID.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW CONNID.
 WRITE: / 'Connid:', LINE-CONNID.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW FLDATE.
 WRITE: / 'Fldate:', LINE-FLDATE.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW CUSTTYPE.
 WRITE: / 'Custtype:', LINE-CUSTTYPE.
 ENDAT.
 WRITE: / LINE-BOOKID, LINE-CLASS.
 AT END OF CLASS.
 ULINE.
 ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
This is also helpful......
LOOP AT <itab>.
AT FIRST. ... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f1>. ...... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f2 >. ...... ENDAT.
 <single line processing>
 AT END OF <f2>. ... ENDAT.
 AT END OF <f1>. ... ENDAT.
AT LAST. .... ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
Regards
Abhishek

Possible Sequential Read Access for a Sorted Table

Hi All,
I have the following warnings in Code inspector check.
'Possible Sequential Read Access for a Sorted Table'
Kindly provide me the solution to overcome this warning message.
This is my code in BAdi : CRM_ORDER_FIELDCHECK , Method : FIELDCHECK
I am getting the above warning at
READ TABLE lt_status INTO ls_status WITH KEY status = 'E0001'
 user_stat_proc = 'ZITRHDQT'
 object_type = 'BUS2000114'.
and at
 MODIFY ct_input_field_names FROM ls_input_field_names
 TRANSPORTING changeable
 WHERE fieldname NE lv_field.
Please see the below code .
DATA : lt_header_guid TYPE crmt_object_guid_tab,
 lt_item_guid TYPE crmt_object_guid_tab,
 lt_order_i TYPE crmt_orderadm_i_wrkt,
 ls_order_i LIKE LINE OF lt_order_i,
 lt_status TYPE crmt_status_wrkt,
 ls_status LIKE LINE OF lt_status,
 ls_input_field_names TYPE crmt_input_field_names.
DATA : lv_header_guid TYPE crmt_fieldcheck_com-guid,
 lv_chng_no TYPE c VALUE 'A',
 lv_field(10) TYPE c VALUE 'ACT_STATUS'.
DATA: lv_status_completed TYPE crmt_boolean.
To Get GUID
IF is_fieldcheck_com-guid IS NOT INITIAL.
 lv_header_guid = is_fieldcheck_com-guid.
ELSE.
 lv_header_guid = is_fieldcheck_com-ref_guid.
ENDIF.
IF is_fieldcheck_com-ref_kind EQ 'A'.
 INSERT lv_header_guid INTO TABLE lt_header_guid.
 ELSE.
 SELECT SINGLE header FROM crmd_orderadm_i INTO lv_header_guid
 WHERE guid = is_fieldcheck_com-ref_guid.
 INSERT lv_header_guid INTO TABLE lt_header_guid.
ENDIF.
*To Get the required details
CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_ORDER_READ'
 EXPORTING
 it_header_guid = lt_header_guid
 IMPORTING
 et_status = lt_status
 EXCEPTIONS
 document_not_found = 1
 error_occurred = 2
 document_locked = 3
 no_change_authority = 4
 no_display_authority = 5
 no_change_allowed = 6
 OTHERS = 7.
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
 WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE lt_status INTO ls_status WITH KEY status = 'E0001'
 user_stat_proc = 'ZITRHDQT'
 object_type = 'BUS2000114'.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
 ls_input_field_names-changeable = lv_chng_no.
 MODIFY ct_input_field_names FROM ls_input_field_names
 TRANSPORTING changeable
 WHERE fieldname NE lv_field.
ENDIF.
ENDMETHOD.
Regards
Venkat

Hello Blake,
Try this:
READ TABLE lt_action_fld WITH KEY STATUS = '0' BINARY SEARCH.
wf_index = sy-tabix.
loop at lt_action_fld from wf_index.
if lt_action_fld-status ne '0'.
exit.
endif.
delete lt_action_fld index wf_index.
endloop.
Let us know, if this helps.
Rgds,
Raghu.

Internal error - insert in sorted tabl ZADRU with

Hello Experts,
While i open BP transaction for one of the business partner. We are getting the following error:
*Internal error - insert in sorted tabl ZADRU with*.
Request your help to resolve this issue. Do we have some SAP note to handle such scenarios. It seems the data has become inconsistent.
Thanks,
Rohit

Hi, Rohit
Table ZADRU - it's your own development, please ask abap-team about this table.
Denis

Memory and performance when copying a sorted table to a standard table

Hello,
As you all probably know, it's not possible to use a sorted table as a tables parameter of a function module, but sometimes you want to use a sorted table in your function module for performance reasons, and at the end of the function module, you just copy it to a standard table to return to the calling program.
The problem with this is that at that moment, the contents of the table is in memory twice, which could result in the well known STORAGE_PARAMETERS_WRONG_SET runtime exception.
I've been looking for ways to do this without using an excessive amount of memory and still being performant. I tried four methods, all have their advantages and disadvantages, so I was hoping someone here could help me come up with the best way to do this. Both memory and performance are an issue.
Requirements :
- Memory usage must be as low as possible
- Performance must be as high as possible
- Method must work on all SAP versions from 4.6c and up
So far I have tried 3 methods.
I included a test report to this message, the output of this on my dev system is :
Test report for memory usage of copying tables
table1[] = table2[]
Memory :    192,751 Kb
Runtime:    436,842
Loop using workarea (with delete from original table)
Memory :    196,797 Kb
Runtime: 1,312,839
Loop using field symbol (with delete from original table)
Memory :    196,766 Kb
Runtime: 1,295,009
The code of the program :
I had some problems pasting the code here, so it can be found at [http://pastebin.com/f5e2848b5|http://pastebin.com/f5e2848b5]
Thanks in advance for the help.
Edited by: Dries Horions on Jun 19, 2009 1:23 PM
Edited by: Dries Horions on Jun 19, 2009 1:39 PM
Edited by: Dries Horions on Jun 19, 2009 1:40 PM
Edited by: Dries Horions on Jun 19, 2009 1:40 PM

I've had another idea:
Create a RFC function like this (replace SOLI_TAB with your table types):
FUNCTION Z_COPY_TABLE .
*"*"Lokale Schnittstelle:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(IT_IN) TYPE SOLI_TAB
*" EXPORTING
*"     VALUE(ET_OUT) TYPE SOLI_TAB
et_out[] = it_in[].
ENDFUNCTION.
and then try something like this in your program:
DATA: gd_copy_done TYPE c LENGTH 1.
DATA: gt_one TYPE soli_tab.
DATA: gt_two TYPE soli_tab.
PERFORM move_tables.
FORM move_tables.
CLEAR gd_copy_done.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_COPY_TABLE'
    STARTING NEW TASK 'ztest'
    PERFORMING copy_done ON END OF TASK
    EXPORTING
      it_in = gt_one[].
CLEAR gt_one[].
WAIT UNTIL gd_copy_done IS NOT INITIAL.
ENDFORM.
FORM copy_done USING ld_task TYPE clike.
RECEIVE RESULTS FROM FUNCTION 'Z_COPY_TABLE'
   IMPORTING
     et_out        = gt_two[].
gd_copy_done = 'X'.
ENDFORM.
Maybe this is a little bit faster than the Memory-Export?
Edited by: Carsten Grafflage on Jul 20, 2009 11:06 AM

Please help me to sort out this issue

Hi,
I have two user MAIN_USER and TMP_USER both have DBA,CONNECT,RESOURCE privileges.
While I am creating the below procedure in MAIN_USER, I am getting the error ‘ORA-00942: table or view does not exist’ in the insert statement line FROM TMP_USER.PROD_MASTER.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE MAST_UPLOAD IS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO PROD_MAST
(SELECT *
FROM TMP_USER.PROD_MASTER);
END;
Please help me to sort out this issue.
Thanks,
Jen.

If the code works for TMP_USER but not for MAIN_USER, then the privileges are not the same. I'm assuming DBA,CONNECT,RESOURCE are roles. Roles are not the only thing that can be assigned to users. Users can have the same roles, but access to different objects. In this case, it looks like one user has access to the table, and the other doesn't.

Error when inserting or changing in a sorted table

Hi Experts,
When i am executing a webdynpro application it says Error when inserting or changing in a sorted table. Can any one help for this.
The termination type was: RABAX_STATE
The ABAP call stack was:
Method: GET_CATEGORY_LIST of program /1BCWDY/F9XHYWN4WKNMG4CDUGA8==CP
Method: IF_COMPONENTCONTROLLER~GET_CATEGORY_LIST of program /1BCWDY/F9XHYWN4WKNMG4CDUGA8==CP
Method: WDDOMODIFYVIEW of program /1BCWDY/F9XHYWN4WKNMG4CDUGA8==CP
Method: IF_WDR_VIEW_DELEGATE~WD_DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program /1BCWDY/F9XHYWN4WKNMG4CDUGA8==CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_DELEGATING_VIEW========CP
Method: MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_VIEW===================CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_CLIENT_COMPONENT=======CP
Method: DO_MODIFY_VIEW of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW_PHASE_MODEL=====CP
Method: PROCESS_REQUEST of program CL_WDR_WINDOW=================CP
in ST22
Object Definition
DATA: lo_node                   TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node,
        lo_node_info              TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_node_info,
        lo_element                TYPE REF TO if_wd_context_element.
Additional Data declarations
DATA: lv_key TYPE string.
Get context node.
lo_node = wd_context->get_child_node( name = 'DROPDOWNLISTS' ).
lo_node_info = lo_node->get_node_info( ).
Call method to fetch the categories.
CALL METHOD cl_hap_wd_start_page_ui=>category_get_list
    EXPORTING
      add_on_application = add_on_application
    IMPORTING
      t_categories       = lt_categories.
Append Default selection entry 'All'.
lw_category-category_id = '00000000'.
lw_category-category_name = 'All'.
APPEND lw_category TO lt_categories.
Sort table after appending the new entry.
SORT lt_categories ASCENDING.
Loop through the category list and populate key(category_id) value(category_name) pair for
LOOP AT lt_categories INTO lw_category.
    lw_key_value-key = lw_category-category_id.
625     lw_key_value-value = lw_category-category_name.
>>>>>     APPEND lw_key_value TO lt_key_values.------>Here it throws an error
627     CLEAR: lw_key_value, lw_category.
628   ENDLOOP.
629
630 * Bind the category key-value pair to the context attribute.
631   CALL METHOD lo_node_info->set_attribute_value_set
632     EXPORTING
633       name      = 'CATEGORY_LIST'
634       value_set = lt_key_values.
635
636 * Make the entry 'All' as default selected.
637   CALL METHOD lo_node->set_attribute
638     EXPORTING
639       value = '00000000'
640       name = 'CATEGORY_LIST'.
641
642 ENDMETHOD.
643
644 method GET_EMPLOYEES.
645

Hello Durga,
from the error what I understood is lt_key_values is a sorted table and you are trying append a new line to it. Incase of sorted table you need to use the INSERT statement and not the APPEND statement.
INSERT lw_key_value INTO table lt_key_values.
BR, Saravanan

Short Dump While Changing Non-KeyField of Sorted Table

Hello,
A short dump occurs while trying to change a field of a sorted table item passed as CHANGING parameter. Are non-key fields in a sorted structure protected? The error message does not explicitely say so. Can anyone link to documentation explaining this behavior?
best regards,
JNN

You are passing by reference with CHANGING.
It looks like read-only stuff can't be passed to method CHANGING.
When I pass a literal or constant, there is a syntax error.
System could have given you a syntax error instead of dump.
Have a look at this snippet. Both method calls throw syntax error.
CLASS mainclass DEFINITION.
PUBLIC SECTION.
    CLASS-METHODS main.
PRIVATE SECTION.
    CLASS-METHODS passref CHANGING cv_test TYPE i.
ENDCLASS.                    "mainclass DEFINITION
CLASS mainclass IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD main.
    "pass literal by ref
    passref(
      CHANGING
        cv_test = '2'
    "pass constant by ref
    CONSTANTS lc_test TYPE i VALUE 1.
    passref(
      CHANGING
        cv_test = lc_test
ENDMETHOD.                    "main
METHOD passref.
    "nothing
ENDMETHOD.                    "passref
ENDCLASS.                    "mainclass IMPLEMENTATION
START-OF-SELECTION.
mainclass=>main( ).

Unable to sort table

Hi all
I have created an advance table and using multiple selection.I set Sort Allowed property 'Yes' for every column in property inspector.
But when I clicked on cloumn it throws a warning "The table cannot be sorted because it has pending changes which would be lost." and I am not able to sort table.
Can somebody give me some suggestions.
Thanks
Bhupendra

I have createed sortable header.I have done this thing many times and it works.But this time only I m facing problem.I am using PPR in this table where I am enabling and disabling the checkbox.
Please give suggestions if anybody has faced this problem.
Thanks
Bhupendra

Internal table reltd issue

Hi,
I have got 3 tables:
it_extnout (old)
Fld1 Fld2 Fld3 Fld4 Fld5 Fld6 Fld7
ABC 123 70 JKL 5.00 A Q
it_extnin (new)
Fld1 Fld2 Fld3 Fld4 Fld5 Fld6 Fld7
ABC 123 99 LMN
it_extnin_x(update flag for new)
Fld1 Fld2 Fld3 Fld4 Fld5 Fld6 Fld7
ABC 123 X X X
So now...my requirement is as follows:
if an update flag is set for any field in it_extnin_x, then new value should get updated in it_extnout table.
Here, fld3, 4, and 6 is set for update, so finally my it_extnout should look like
Fld1 Fld2 Fld3 Fld4 Fld5 Fld6 Fld7
ABC 123 99 LMN 5.00 Q
Also, any field from fld3 to fld7 could be marked for an update, so it is dynamic.
I do not want to write read statements for each column like
read table itab with key fld3 = X (if sy-subrc is 0, then do some processing)
or read table itab with key where fld4 = X and so on....
What is the optimum way to achieve the same?
Any useful is deeply appreciated!
Thanks
Follow the rules of engagement, Don't use multiple user accounts for posting the question
If you repeat this your user will be locked and deleted
Edited by: Vijay Babu Dudla on Apr 20, 2011 10:19 AM

Try this.I think you want output like this......
DATA: BEGIN OF LINE,
 CARRID TYPE SBOOK-CARRID,
 CONNID TYPE SBOOK-CONNID,
 FLDATE TYPE SBOOK-FLDATE,
 CUSTTYPE TYPE SBOOK-CUSTTYPE,
 CLASS TYPE SBOOK-CLASS,
 BOOKID TYPE SBOOK-BOOKID,
 END OF LINE.
DATA ITAB LIKE SORTED TABLE OF LINE WITH UNIQUE KEY TABLE LINE.
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE CUSTTYPE CLASS BOOKID
 FROM SBOOK INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO LINE.
AT FIRST.
 WRITE / 'List of Bookings'.
 ULINE.
ENDAT.
 AT NEW CARRID.
 WRITE: / 'Carrid:', LINE-CARRID.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW CONNID.
 WRITE: / 'Connid:', LINE-CONNID.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW FLDATE.
 WRITE: / 'Fldate:', LINE-FLDATE.
 ENDAT.
 AT NEW CUSTTYPE.
 WRITE: / 'Custtype:', LINE-CUSTTYPE.
 ENDAT.
 WRITE: / LINE-BOOKID, LINE-CLASS.
 AT END OF CLASS.
 ULINE.
 ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
This is also helpful......
LOOP AT <itab>.
AT FIRST. ... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f1>. ...... ENDAT.
 AT NEW <f2 >. ...... ENDAT.
 <single line processing>
 AT END OF <f2>. ... ENDAT.
 AT END OF <f1>. ... ENDAT.
AT LAST. .... ENDAT.
ENDLOOP.
Regards
Abhishek

Sort table of objects by object attribute

Hi all,
I would like to write method for sorting table of objects. Sorting will be according selected attribute of object.
My problem is that when I have dynamic data, I'm not able to access attributes of object. Here is example in code. Problematic lines are commented.
If you have any idea how to solve it, I will be very happy.
CLASS lcl_reflection DEFINITION CREATE PUBLIC.
PUBLIC SECTION.
 CLASS-METHODS: sort_object_table_by_field IMPORTING field_name TYPE char72
 direction TYPE c DEFAULT 'A'
 CHANGING object_table TYPE table.
ENDCLASS. "lcl_reflection DEFINITION
CLASS lcl_reflection IMPLEMENTATION.
METHOD sort_object_table_by_field.
 DATA: obj_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_refdescr,
 cls_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_classdescr,
 tab_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
 elm_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
 struc_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
 line TYPE REF TO data,
 tab TYPE REF TO data,
 object TYPE REF TO data,
 lt_component TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
 ls_component LIKE LINE OF lt_component.
 FIELD-SYMBOLS: <object> TYPE any,
 <tab> TYPE table,
 <line> TYPE any,
 <value> TYPE any.
 READ TABLE object_table INDEX 1 ASSIGNING <object>.
 cls_type_desc ?= cl_abap_classdescr=>describe_by_object_ref( <object> ).
 elm_type_desc ?= cls_type_desc->get_attribute_type( field_name ).
 obj_type_desc ?= cl_abap_refdescr=>create( cls_type_desc ).
 UNASSIGN <object>.
 ls_component-name = 'key'.
 ls_component-type = elm_type_desc.
 APPEND ls_component TO lt_component.
 ls_component-name = 'object'.
 ls_component-type ?= obj_type_desc.
 APPEND ls_component TO lt_component.
 struc_type_desc ?= cl_abap_structdescr=>create( lt_component ).
 tab_type_desc ?= cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( p_line_type = struc_type_desc
 p_table_kind = cl_abap_tabledescr=>tablekind_std
 p_unique = abap_false ).
 REFRESH lt_component.
 CLEAR ls_component.
 CREATE DATA line TYPE HANDLE struc_type_desc.
 CREATE DATA tab TYPE HANDLE tab_type_desc.
 CREATE DATA object TYPE HANDLE obj_type_desc.
 ASSIGN tab->* TO <tab>.
 ASSIGN line->* TO <line>.
 ASSIGN object->* TO <object>.
 LOOP AT object_table REFERENCE INTO object.
 APPEND INITIAL LINE TO <tab> REFERENCE INTO line.
 ASSIGN object->* TO <value>.
 ASSIGN line->* TO <line>.
* <line>-key = <value>->(field_name).
* <line>-object = object.
 ENDLOOP.
* SORT <tab> BY key.
* LOOP AT <tab> REFERENCE INTO line.
* APPEND INITIAL LINE TO object_table REFERENCE INTO object.
* object = line-object.
* ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD. "sort_object_table_by_field
ENDCLASS. "lcl_reflection IMPLEMENTATION

Ok guys, it's solved. It was little bit more complicated then I expected. Thanks for you help.
METHOD sort_object_table_by_field.
 TYPES: t_object TYPE REF TO object.
 DATA: obj_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_refdescr,
 cls_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_classdescr,
 tab_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
 elm_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
 struc_type_desc TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
 r_line TYPE REF TO data,
 r_tab TYPE REF TO data,
 r_object TYPE REF TO data,
 r_obj TYPE REF TO data,
 lt_component TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
 ls_component LIKE LINE OF lt_component.
 FIELD-SYMBOLS: <object> TYPE any,
 <obj> TYPE REF TO object,
 <tab> TYPE table,
 <line> TYPE any,
 <key> TYPE any,
 <fs_key> TYPE any,
 <fs_object> TYPE any.
 READ TABLE object_table INDEX 1 ASSIGNING <object>.
 cls_type_desc ?= cl_abap_classdescr=>describe_by_object_ref( <object> ).
 elm_type_desc ?= cls_type_desc->get_attribute_type( field_name ).
 obj_type_desc ?= cl_abap_refdescr=>create( cls_type_desc ).
 UNASSIGN <object>.
 ls_component-name = 'key'.
 ls_component-type = elm_type_desc.
 APPEND ls_component TO lt_component.
 ls_component-name = 'object'.
 ls_component-type ?= obj_type_desc.
 APPEND ls_component TO lt_component.
 struc_type_desc ?= cl_abap_structdescr=>create( lt_component ).
 tab_type_desc ?= cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( p_line_type = struc_type_desc
 p_table_kind = cl_abap_tabledescr=>tablekind_std
 p_unique = abap_false ).
 REFRESH lt_component.
 CLEAR ls_component.
 CREATE DATA r_line TYPE HANDLE struc_type_desc.
 CREATE DATA r_tab TYPE HANDLE tab_type_desc.
 CREATE DATA r_object TYPE HANDLE obj_type_desc.
 CREATE DATA r_obj TYPE REF TO object.
 ASSIGN r_tab->* TO <tab>.
 LOOP AT object_table REFERENCE INTO r_object.
 APPEND INITIAL LINE TO <tab> REFERENCE INTO r_line.
 ASSIGN r_object->* TO <object>.
 ASSIGN r_obj->* TO <obj>.
 MOVE <object> TO <obj>.
 ASSIGN <obj>->(field_name) TO <key>.
 ASSIGN r_line->* TO <line>.
 ASSIGN COMPONENT 'KEY' OF STRUCTURE <line> TO <fs_key>.
 ASSIGN COMPONENT 'OBJECT' OF STRUCTURE <line> TO <fs_object>.
 <fs_object> = <object>.
 <fs_key> = <key>.
 ENDLOOP.
 DATA: sort_field TYPE fieldname.
 sort_field = 'KEY'.
 SORT <tab> BY (sort_field).
 REFRESH object_table.
 LOOP AT <tab> REFERENCE INTO r_line.
 APPEND INITIAL LINE TO object_table REFERENCE INTO r_object.
 ASSIGN r_line->* TO <line>.
 ASSIGN r_object->* TO <object>.
 ASSIGN COMPONENT 'OBJECT' OF STRUCTURE <line> TO <fs_object>.
 <object> = <fs_object>.
 ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.

Hi i need help in sort in out issue in worflow in sap EDI

i sap gurus
i have two issues in sap workflow .can u guys help me out in sorting out these issues.
1) When checking out/reserving a work flow item(TC: SBWP), there is no option to display who has it checked out. When the workflow item is reserved, it is removed from everyone elses workflow list. It can happen that people put these back at the end of the day, when there is no time to work on them any longer. It would be a great help to have visability to all items even if they are reserved, and to have a name associated with it to see who has it reserved.
2) In the "Change Layout" option of work flow (TC:SBWP), there are dynamic fields that look like they could be assigned. Perhaps one of these could be used for the person doing the reserving, but in addition to this, it would be very helpful if customer number could also be populated in one of these fields. This would allow sales specialist to pick up work flow items by customer.
thanks in advance
sam sd

Hi Sam,
As far your first requirement concerned,I don't think it is possible.
because reserveing of workitem is to prevent other users from executing it.
So you can't just have the workitems only for display in other users inbox even after someone else reserved it.It defeats the own purpose.
I would suggest you to go for a report kinda tool where you can actually help the users have the visibility.
About second one,you use tcode SWL1 to define the dynamic columns and enter the container elemet ther to have the customer number displayed.

Standard versus sorted tables

Hi,
in SE30 (abap runtime analysis) i have tried to possible solutions for a DB access, and according to the performance tuning rules you should use sorted(or hashed) tables in stead of standard table, but in my case the runtime is almost equal. How is that possible ? Any explanations ?
Situation : table RSSELDONE, more than 80000 records
Code 1 with standard table - runtime 6.710.000 ms
data: i_tab type table of rsseldone,
 lwa like line of i_tab.
select * from rsseldone into table i_tab.
read table i_tab into lwa
with key rnr = 'REQU_3N57ZUZODOJ53FHTMO97BKDTH'.
Code 2 with sorted table - runtime 7.051.939 ms
data: i_stab type sorted table of rsseldone
 with non-unique key
 rnr
 initial size 0,
 lwa like line of i_stab.
select * from rsseldone into table i_stab.
read table i_stab into lwa
with table key rnr = 'REQU_3N57ZUZODOJ53FHTMO97BKDTH'.
Strange !

hi,
Standard Table - the most commonly used type of table. You can sort and resort this table anytime. You can have duplicate records in them. Recommend that when accessing these tables, you sort them by a key and then READ via a BINARY SEARCH - better performance. When you write to this table the record is "appended" to the end of the table. In order to maintain the sort sequence (if any) you must use the SORT command again.
Sorted table - this table has a defined sort sequence. You cannot resort. You can have duplicates. When you READ these tables, SAP automatically tries to use a BINARY SEARCH. Because you use a Binary Search, the retrieval time isexpodential to the number of records. When you write a record to this table the table is resorted.
Hashed Table - this table has a defined key. When you write to the table it uses a hashing algorithm to identify where the record is stored (think if this as writing the location of a page in an index of a book). When you READ this table the system looks up this "index" and retrieves the record. Because of this the retrieval time is constant. Writing to this type of table takes the most time as it needs to calculate the hashing algorithm.
Just go thorugh this link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/EN/fc/eb35de358411d1829f0000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Regard
anver

Currency Format in Spry Sort Table

Any ideas on how to format all numbers in a spry sort table
into US currency? Currently on my site, Spry is not displaying the
".00" that is included in my XML file.
My
Spry Sort Table Example

Hi,
yes, I`ve had the same behavior. As a workaround, you have to change the format of the cells.
Go into the properties of the cells:
-> Right mouse click
-> format cells
-> category
-> number
-> change something, e.g. the number of decimal places to show
Then you will have to map the component again to the same cells under "Display Data".
And now, the currency information will be shown correctly.
Regards
Victor

Sorted Table - tabix issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for