Sorting Issue in T-Code CS15

please help me out, i am facing an issue with the CS15, that in EN login it sorts the field 'Required Quantity(DIMNG)' well on the output, & when i try to Sort the same field in FR login, it does not Sort good.
i am Sorting this field with the Sort Toll provided with the header of field.
& if there is any OSS note also then please suggest me well
<< Moderator message - Everyone's problem is important. Please do not ask for help quickly. >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Dec 10, 2010 3:57 PM

>
wisetak wrote:
> please help me out, i am facing an issue with the CS15, that in EN login it sorts the field 'Required Quantity(DIMNG)' well on the output, & when i try to Sort the same field in FR login, it does not Sort good.
> i am Sorting this field with the Sort Toll provided with the header of field.
>
> & if there is any OSS note also then please suggest me well ASAP.
Dear,
Is the field on which you are trying to sort is a text based field?
Regards,
Prasobh

Similar Messages

Report Output is not same as R/3 4.7 and ECC6 ( sort issue)

Dear Experts,
I have a problem with external sort used in the program. due to that report output records are not in the same order.
For example, i am extracting data from BSEG with fields company code, fiscal year, document no, item no, amount and GL Respectively.
in both the systems (R/3 4.7 and ECC6), data in internal tables are in same order by default.
but after the external sort using filelds company code, fiscal year and document no.
output records are sorted exactly with respect to the external sort order in both systems, but for certain line items are not in same order.
Please check below example.
For example in R/3:
684
2012
5000000532
5
H
2662.51
411100
684
2012
5000000532
4
H
13
555200
684
2012
5000000532
3
S
0.5
635400
684
2012
5000000532
2
S
12.5
627800
684
2012
5000000532
1
S
2662.51
555209
In ECC6,
684
2012
5000000532
1
S
2662.51
555209
684
2012
5000000532
2
S
12.5
627800
684
2012
5000000532
3
S
0.5
635400
684
2012
5000000532
4
H
13
555200
684
2012
5000000532
5
H
2662.51
411100

The order of extracted records can no be assumed to be constant, any SQL optimizer can change behavior, even without any wide upgrade, but a single database or kernel patch as well as many operation of database administrator can change the order, as well as a change of user behavior, if they fill now another field in selection. So it is good practices to always sort (or use sorted type) internal table extracted or use a ORDER BY clause (provided there is an index in database, else do not)
Read online documentation of SELECT statement clause ORDER BY
The order of the rows in the result set refers to all columns that are not listed after ORDER BY, is undefined, and can be different in repeated executions of the same SELECT statement.
There are also some [MANY > 1000] OSS notes on the subject (look for your database, e.g. 1858427 - Incorrect Sorting of SQL-Select Statement, 1859655 - The result set of an SQL-Select Statement may not be sorted, 1858479 - Result set of select statement is not sorted, 1858569 - Incorrect access to result set of SELECT statement, etc.)
Also if you sort an internal table and require records with same key values to keep their respective order, use the STABLE clause.
Regards,
Raymond

Sorting issue after upgrade from 9i to 10g

Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T.

903714 wrote:
Dear all,
It is found that the sorting behavior is different after upgrade from 9i to 10g.
In 9i, even if the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause, the sorting order is consistent for a particular SQL statement and most likely the sequence follows the searched key fields' order.
After upgrade to 10g, the query output could vary as long as the SQL statement does not specify the ORDER BY clause.
Is it due to the Reverse Docid Sorting issue? How can I troubleshoot this issue?
Thanks for your help,
M.T. This is expected behavior in 10g. Oracle will not order the dataset for you unless and until you explicitly specify it.
So without using order by clause in 10g, oracle doesn't guarantee that rows will be ordered.
To go back to old behavior like 9i, you can set a workaround by
alter session set "_newsort_enabled"=false;
Also see MOS - Order Of Data Retrieval Differs after upgrading 9i To 10g [ID 456707.1]

Query as a web service Sorting issue

Hi All,
We have designed an existing BI query as a web service but it seems to be ignoring the Sort order of different characteristics used (as defined in Bex Query Designer).
Using the Context menu in QAAS and defining/managing the Sort is not working.
Has anyone experienced such an issue and how to handle this?
Thanks and Regards,
Bansi

Hi All,
You can try this solution. It has something to do with the universe parameter, END_SQL.
I implemented this as a work around and it solved our problem about the sorting issue with QAAWS.
Here are the steps:
1: Open the universe
2. Ope File, then Universe Parameter
3. Click the parameter tab
4. Scroll down until you see the 'END_SQL' entry. This entry is blank by default.
5. Select END_SQL
6. On the VALUE box, type: ORDER BY 1
7. This will enable the REPLACE button. Click REPLACE
8. Save the universe
9 Test a query using 2 columns and view the SQL.
You should see now the ORDER BY 1 inferred in the SQL statement.
Voila!!!!
Of course you can always add ORDER By 1,2,3 later if there's a need.
Enjoy.....
Ferdinand

Performance issue in this code

public int[][] init(int[][] a, int m, int n){
for(int j=0; j<n; j++){
for(int i=0; i<m; i++){
a[i][j] = i+j;
return a;
}Just a technical quest faced in one of the interview...
There is a performance issue in this code. Can you identify, correct and justify your answer?
Edited by: EJP on 17/10/2011 20:29

mithu wrote:
public int[][] init(int[][] a, int m, int n){
for(int j=0; j<n; j++){
for(int i=0; i<m; i++){
a[i][j] = i+j;
return a;
}Just a technical quest faced in one of the interview...
There is a performance issue in this code. Can you identify, correct and justify your answer?Not a good question at all. There's no performance issue here that can be positively identified by inspection. The only potentially significant one is, as EJP pointed out, loss of locality of reference because of the order of the loops. But even that's not a guarantee, since I don't think array layouts are defined by the spec. We could only determine for sure that that's a performance problem by profiling.

Finder sort issue

I seem to be having a sorting issue.
This order seems odd to me, but like to get your opinions about it.
(This folder is sorted alphabetically by file name.)
2008 01.doc
2008 02.doc
Activiteit_oktober.doc
af 200802 - groen reserve.rtf
af 200802 - groen.rtf
af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc
af 20080126 - groen.rtf
af 20080216 avond - leiding WE.pages
af 20080704 avond - groen & oranje.pages
af 20080709 avond - bezinning.rtf
idee spel.rtf
In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?

In my logic the file 'af 20071130 - groen-geel.doc' should be before the two files beginning with 'af 200802' and not after. Or is this just me?
OS X Finder sorts strings of digits according to their value, not digit by digit. 200802 is less than 20071130. Here is a note on the issue:
http://homepage.mac.com/thgewecke/sorting.html

Sort TO in T-code: LM00 & LM05 for RF

How to sort TO in T-code: LM00 & LM05 for RF
Thanks

hi Santosh,
unfortunately there is no way. It is prohibited in the program (i.e. : only 5 lines are whown for maintenance, if you want to page down to the 6th line, than the first line is shown again)
ec

Front Row sorting issues

Hello,
I know this issue has been posted several times and without any real solutions. But I'm going to ask again anyway in case the magical hacking gnomes have found a work-around.
I have many sorting issues. There seems to be a lot of kvetching on here already about how Front Row sorts TV shows. But not only do my shows come up backwards within seasons, in some cases seasons themselves are out of order. For example, I have all 3 seasons of 30 Rock (purchased through iTMS) and they go season 1, season 3, season 2. Several other shows with multiple seasons are the same.
But I also have a music sorting issue. The first part of this issue has to do with compilations. I've got several compilations in my library, and in iTunes I've sorted them by Various Artists rather than individual artists. In Front Row, if I scroll down to "V," there is no "Various Artists" like you might expect but instead a list of all the artists in all the compilations completely out of order. (Actually, they're ordered by their track number on the different albums. Yeah. That makes sense.) I could deal with these artists showing up in their normal places alphabetically, but not all lumped together under V.
The other issue has to do with albums with one artist who has some tracks that feature other artists. Kanye West's "Graduation" is a good example. About half the tracks on the album are him "featuring Jamie Foxx," for example. So I put "Kanye West" in the sort field of this album so it displays properly in iTunes. Not only does this seem to have no effect on how things are sorted in Front Row, but there's actually multiple "Kanye West"s now, each one identical, as well as multiple "Kanye West feat. Jamie Foxx," lines and all the other multiple artist track. Uh...what?
So I know that Front Row for some ridiculous reason is (a) not customizable and (b) operates under completely different sorting rules than iTunes (which makes no sense), but if anyone has any advice or tips or comments or whatever, that would be greatly appreciated.
I've considered switching to a different media management program, but what I like about Front Row is its simplicity. I don't really feel like learning a whole new system (let alone getting my wife to buy into that idea). I've got better ways to spend my time. So, it's a trade off, I guess.
Anyway, Apple Gods? Are you out there? Are you listening?

I can't believe we're still banging on about the sorting problems. Apple have seen fit to provide a number of features to allow the user to get iTunes working the way they like, e.g. grouping compilation artists and the use of sort fields. I think you can now even keep compilation artists grouped on the iPod. But why oh why do they then totally ignore this for the AppleTV and Front Row (which look like the same codebase to me)?
I have hundreds of genuine Artists that I want to see listed in the Artists' list, but not the thousands of others that appear on compilations. They don't even sort the artists by the Artist Sort field that they themselves provide in iTunes. This makes a nonsense of trying to use either the ATV or Front Row.
Playlists are no help as they simply lump all contained tracks in one great list. Useless.
The annoying thing is, they can get it right. iTunes just gets better and better in this regard, each release sorting out more of the omissions of earlier versions. But ATV and Front Row - nope, nothing. Still just as stupid as always. Just what will it take to convince Apple to 'sort' (ha) this out? How can they justify such entirely different ways of working on their different products?

Sorting addresses by zip code

In order to do bulk mailing I need to sort addresses by zip code. I love the smart group feature, is there a way to organize groups by zip code. Thanks, Mary

Select the items in a given group. Select Print from AB's File menu. In the dialog select Labels or Envelopes from the Style drop down menu. Click on the Label tab. You can now select Postal Code for sort order. The result may be printed to a PDF file if desired rather than to the printer, but if you plan to use labels you will need to select the appropriate type of label paper layout you will be feeding into your printer.
Alternatively, you can export the data to a .CSV file using an exporter utility (look for them at VersionTracker or MacUpdate) then import the data into another application such as Excel or Word where they can be sorted and mail-merged.

Index (HHK) sorting issue in Japanese (RoboHelp X3)

I'm a Japanese localizing engineer who now tries to generate
a WebHelp with a nicely sorted index in Japanese.
As I assume that this has been a known issue for double-byte
languages for a long time, a Japanese index cannot be sorted
perfectly in a compiled chm or WebHelp. In Japanese, there are
several types of Japanese characters (Kanji, Katakana, Hiragana).
Regardless of what type of character a string is typed in, Japanese
strings should be sorted according to <i>yomi-gana</i>,
the way each Japanese string pronounces but currently an index gets
sorted according to the following order (in ASCII code):
*number
*alphabet
*hiragana
*katanaka
*kanji... and so on.
So here I'm trying to do the followings:
1. In a HHK file, I put <so>...</so> in front of
every entry where I spell out the pronounciation in each <so>
segment.
2. Open the HHK with HTML Workshop, sort the file, and save
it (I'll get the file sorted according to what I have put in
<so>..</so>.
3. Open it with a Text Editor and remove all the
<so>..</so> entrires.
4. Put the HHK file in a build folder and generate a
chm/WebHelp in RoboHelp X3.
In the 4th step, I don't want RoboHelp to re-sort the HHK but
it does it automatically. If I can disable the index sorting
functionality in RoboHelp X3 (the latest version in Japanese) but
looks like there is no way to do it. If anyone is sure that it's
not possible to disable the auto-sorting functionality in RoboHelp,
please let me know so that I can give up witout a sweat.
By the way, I have tried the alternative for WebHelp that
skips the 3rd step and removes all the <so>...</so> in
the files that RoboHelp creates. The result is that everything got
messed up and some of the contents in the Index couldn't be viewed
in a browser.
Thanks.
Rota.

Hi Paul
Have you tried just right-clicking in the index and choosing sort?
Click the image below to view larger.
Note that this may require you to temporarily configure Microsoft HTML Help as the primary layout and editing the Project Settings in order to allow the sort function to appear.
Remember, you press Ctrl+Shift+? to open Project Settings. You then would turn off (or ensure it's turned off) the Binary Index feature.
Once you have done this, you would then revert any settings that you changed to allow things to work.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
RoboHelp Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Begin learning RoboHelp HTML 7 or 8 within the day - $24.95!
Adobe Certified RoboHelp HTML Training
SorcerStone Blog
RoboHelp eBooks

Sorting Issue in ALV table

Hi,
I have included a ALV table in my application. A column in the table is containing a list of amounts. When i am trying to sort it in ascending or descending order, the values are not listed properly. I am using "PAD_AMT7S" as the data type for the attribute which will accept up to 2 decimals. The issue is,
if the column is containing values like
0.00,
8.75,
17.00,
8.50 and
17.50.
if i perform ascending type of sorting the values are re-arranged as,
0.00
17.00
17.50
8.50
8.75
and on descending
8.75
8.50
17.50
17.00
0.00
Which are all incorrect. Please provide me your suggestions..
Thanks,
Mugundhan

Hi,
Are you using the IF_WD_TABLE_METHOD_HNDL for the sort, or you wrote your own code?
IF_WD_TABLE_METHOD_HNDL worked incorrectly for some special fields, in these cases I had to write the sorting code manually.
e.g.
CALL METHOD WDEVENT->GET_STRING
   EXPORTING
     NAME   = 'COL'
   RECEIVING
     VALUE = lv_col_name.
CALL METHOD WDEVENT->GET_STRING
   EXPORTING
     NAME   = 'DIRECTION'
   RECEIVING
     VALUE = lv_direction.
CASE lv_col_name.
    WHEN 'TABLE_FIELD1'.
      IF lv_direction EQ '00'.
        SORT lt_table BY CURR ASCENDING.
        ELSE.
          SORT lt_table BY CURR DESCENDING .
      ENDIF.
Is the table sorted incorrectly here?
Bye
N.

Sorting issue in inner loop not working

Here is a small example to get a better understanding of the issue we are facing.
Following is the XML Structure.
<G_MAIN>
<CP_ACCT>40010.0</CP_ACCT>
<G_BATCH>
<JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>09/01/12</JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>
<JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>09/03/12</JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>
</G_BATCH>
</G_MAIN>
<G_MAIN>
<CP_ACCT>40010.0</CP_ACCT>
<G_BATCH>
<JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>09/01/12</JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>
<JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>09/04/12</JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>
<JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>09/02/12</JRNL_EFFECTIVE_DATE>
</G_BATCH>
</G_MAIN>
We have two G_MAIN groups in the above example.
Since we need to group based on CP_ACCT value, we have written code on the RTF to achieve this.
So ideally, data under both the G_BATCH groups (total of 5records) has to be sorted.
But when sorting, it is sorting each of the G_BATCH groups and printing them.
As a result of this, this is how the output is shown.
09/01/12
09/03/12
09/01/12
09/02/12
09/04/12
Edited by: user12258588 on Sep 24, 2012 11:34 AM

Hi,
In the code lines clear the work areas before evry read statement and and check for sy-subrc after evry read statement.
and populate ur work areas in to the text that need to be displayed.
Regards,
Vijaya Lakshmi.T

Sorting issue in Pojo Datacontrol Filter-Paging ADF Table

hi,
Created and af:table using sample given at ADF Code Corner 037. How-to build pagination into ADF POJO Data Control(http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/adf/learnmore/37-adf-pojo-pagination-169179.pdf).
with this sample, able to get pagination and implemented filtering by overriding queryListener.
but there is an issue with sorting, even though sortListener() is implemented, when a column is sorted from UI ..
First ADF inbuilt sort is getting called, getAllDepartments(int index, int range) is invoked TotalRecords/Range times.
Second sortListener() method is getting invoked.
is there any way to skip the first step? so that i can write my own Sort logic in SortListener() and trigger the Iterator progrmatically?
-thanks

Hi Arunkumar,
Thanks for your reply. But for custom table, how to create that filter model ?
When i create the table by dragging it from view, filter model is assigned by default to query descriptor.
But for this case, how to set the filterModel attribute ? Do i need to create any custom filter model class here ?
If yes, how to write that. let me know any pointers.
Please let me know in this regard.
Thanks,
Mahipal

Strange sorting issues with podcasts?

I subscribe to the Onion News Network podcasts, the audio only versions, and no matter what information I change I cannot get my podcasts to sort together. iTunes keeps them together in the finder, but the app separates them. I've had two separate icons for the past few years, and now there is a third! Please see the image below and help if you can. The second view only shows 3 podcasts, as seen below.
P.S. The new icons randomly show up when the podcasts are refreshed. Is it something on Onion's end? If so, why is nobody else asking about this!

Hi Vetsrini,
I have implemented the above mentioned code in my logic. But it works fine only when the nodes in the XML has the data. In case if the XML has null value in one fund, It is not sorted according to the latest records. Can u please provide an alternative how to sort the data using date? I have read in ur previous posts that the date needs to be converted into Canonical Format inorder to sort according to date. Can u please send me the syntax how to convert a date into Canonical Format? Right now the format of the date in my XML is in MM/DD/YYYY format. Please help me. I am struck up with this only issue which is causing me a trouble since 1 week.
Thanks & Regards,
Pradeep Reddy Kypa
8801908980

Name searches sorted by name search code

Dear Experts,
We use SRM-MDM3.0
In the 'Catalog Items' table in the Data Manager, when I pick search by 'Named Search' parameter, the values of the Named Searches are not sorted.
Since we have a lot of named searches, we want the 'Named Search' parameter to be sorted by the named search code.
I tried to define 'sort index' for the named searches code on the Console but this field can not be edited.
Does anyone know how can we solve this issue?
Thanks & regards,
Keren

Hi,
whether you have included the parameter --namedsearch = Catalog --fixed value in the SRM SPRO config
Please check
Regards
G.Ganesh Kumar

Sorting Issue in T-Code CS15

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for