"Source File does not match XML Schema"

Using MDM 5.5 SP4 Patch 2 (Build 5.5.34.26) on a 32-bit system (WinServer 2003, Enterprise Edition SP1.
This source file and schema have been verified by SAP Tech Support and again using Altova XML Spy. The schema was loaded into MDM through the console and the source file was successfully mapped against it and the data manually imported into MDM. The customer record was then cleansed using the Data Manager and the import map was used to create an inbound port. However, when the Import Server goes to import the file using the map, the following error is dropped into the log: "Source File does not match XML Schema". Has anyone else seen this error?
Thanks, Don
IMPORT LOG ENTRY:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="MDM_Log.xsl"?>
<MDM_Log version="1.0" path="H:PROGRA~1SAPMDM~1.5IMPORT~1TempMDIS_TASK@@U@[email protected]"
>
     <Open ts-long="18:24:35 GMT, Saturday, February 03, 2007" ts="2007/02/03 18:24:35.108 GMT" pid="8640" host="bp1tulap452" compile-type="RELEASE_32">
          <Trace ts="2007/02/03 18:24:35.249 GMT" tid="7216" entry-no="3">[BP US FUELS CUSTOMER MASTER] Import Task Started. Chunk size[50000], No. parallel chunks[1]</Trace>
          <Trace ts="2007/02/03 18:24:43.890 GMT" tid="5980" entry-no="11">xSaxParser: Starting.</Trace>
          <Trace ts="2007/02/03 18:24:43.937 GMT" tid="5980" entry-no="19">xSaxParser: Ending.</Trace>
          <Trace ts="2007/02/03 18:24:43.937 GMT" tid="5980" entry-no="20">Source file does not conform to XML Schema!<LINE-FEED/></Trace>
          <Trace ts="2007/02/03 18:24:45.312 GMT" tid="7216" entry-no="29">[RESPOSITORY]Import Task Finished. Chunk size[50000], No. parallel chunks[1]</Trace>
     </Open>
</MDM_Log>
SOURCE FILE:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <ns1:CustomerCreateResp xmlns:ns1="urn:bp:xi:up:re:cust_mdm:cmdm:pr5:100">
- <CUSTOMER>
- <item>
<CUSTOMERNO>0090154474</CUSTOMERNO>
<MDMCUSTOMER>2463</MDMCUSTOMER>
<CREATE_DATE>22/01/2007,11:43:49</CREATE_DATE>
- <RETURN>
<TYPE />
<MESSAGE />
</RETURN>
- <PT_CONTPART_RETURN>
- <item>
<MDM_CONTACT>0000000001</MDM_CONTACT>
<CONTACT>0001111119</CONTACT>
</item>
- <item>
<MDM_CONTACT>0000000004</MDM_CONTACT>
<CONTACT>0002222229</CONTACT>
</item>
</PT_CONTPART_RETURN>
- <PARTNERS>
- <item>
<CUSTOMERNO>0090154474</CUSTOMERNO>
<PARTNER_FUNCTION>RE</PARTNER_FUNCTION>
<PARTNER_NUMBER>0001333329</PARTNER_NUMBER>
<DEFAULT_PARTNER>X</DEFAULT_PARTNER>
</item>
- <item>
<CUSTOMERNO>0090154474</CUSTOMERNO>
<PARTNER_FUNCTION>WE</PARTNER_FUNCTION>
<PARTNER_NUMBER>0001555559</PARTNER_NUMBER>
<DEFAULT_PARTNER />
</item>
</PARTNERS>
</item>
</CUSTOMER>
</ns1:CustomerCreateResp>
SCHEMA:
   <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
- <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns="urn:bp:xi:up:re:cust_mdm:cmdm:pr5:100" targetNamespace="urn:bp:xi:up:re:cust_mdm:cmdm:pr5:100" elementFormDefault="unqualified">
<xsd:element name="CustomerCreateResp" type="CustomerCreateResp" />
- <xsd:complexType name="CustomerCreateResp">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">682cc2d0aa6e11db9b800015c5888624</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="CUSTOMER">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">f68988f0a02e11db94bb00166f98336c</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="item" maxOccurs="unbounded">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b20a75811dba9d400166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="CUSTOMERNO" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b21a75811db9c4800166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="MDMCUSTOMER" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b22a75811dbcbac00166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="CREATE_DATE" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b23a75811dbcc0300166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="RETURN" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b24a75811db8d5500166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="TYPE" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b25a75811db876d00166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="MESSAGE" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b26a75811db85c400166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="PT_CONTPART_RETURN" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b27a75811db8ca900166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="item" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b28a75811dbaae100166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="MDM_CONTACT" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b29a75811dbaade00166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="CONTACT" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2aa75811dbc24c00166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="PARTNERS" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2ba75811dbb74500166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="item" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2ca75811db9f6500166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
- <xsd:complexType>
- <xsd:sequence>
- <xsd:element name="CUSTOMERNO" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2da75811db9bd800166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="PARTNER_FUNCTION" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2ea75811dbb84100166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="PARTNER_NUMBER" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b2fa75811db852800166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
- <xsd:element name="DEFAULT_PARTNER" type="xsd:string" minOccurs="0">
- <xsd:annotation>
<xsd:appinfo source="http://sap.com/xi/TextID">72ea9b30a75811db968400166f983d94</xsd:appinfo>
</xsd:annotation>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:schema>

You have to define the namespace in the URI field of XML Schmea in Console.
In MDM Console,
Admin -> XML Schemas -> Create XML Schema
You have to specify the namespace urn:bp:xi:up:re:cust_mdm:cmdm:pr5:100 in the URI property.
Please update this post if fixed your problem.

Similar Messages

"Source file does not conform to XML Schema!" error at Import Server

Dear SDN,
When I run Import Server the import job stopped with the error "Source file does not conform to XML Schema!" in Log file. I used MDM SP05 Patch01 and HF1.
Both of 2 Import Server have same problems. Of course it works in Import Manager.
What do I have to check?
Regards,
Eric

Hi Eric
Just confirm this...
One needs to load XML schema file in MDM and can be done by specifying this file in Port .
Refer this link.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_mdm550/helpdata/en/fa/69b20ae0ae4b158a3f6d025b3d3847/content.htm
Just make sure that corresponding XSD file is specified in the port
Regards

Planning Quick Win Error: Registration file does not match the app version.

Gents,
I have a Fusion 11.1.2 install on a Windows 2003 server environment.
After creating the Planning App in Classic mode, I logged back in to Initialize the App... and I got this.
This occurred when I tried to log on to the Planning App in Workspace. (I was about to go Create/Refresh the app) :
"An error occurred while processing this page. Check the log for details.Please close the current tab and open application again. Single Sign on Validation failed"
The SharedServices_Security.log goes as follows:
2009-05-12 16:08:11,437 ERROR [http-28080-Processor3] com.hyperion.css.common.CSSUtils.checkValidArgument(Unknown Source) -- 26:1002:Invalid value for identity. Enter a valid value.
2009-05-12 16:08:11,468 WARN [http-28080-Processor3] com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.nv.NativeProvider.getHierarchicalRoleTree(Unknown Source) -- Exception getting Child Roles in hierarchy [Root Cause: 26:1002:Invalid value for identity. Enter a valid value. ]
2008-05-12 16:42:47,781 WARN [http-28080-Processor9] com.hyperion.css.spi.impl.nv.XMLRoleRegDocumentModel.recurseDocumentTree(Unknown Source) -- The Product 'Hyperion Planning' Version 'HP-9.5.0' in the Registration file does not match the application version '9.5.0'
Any suggestions?
Thanks.
Eric.

Hi,
If you are running on a Microsoft OS, have a look the log :- :\Hyperion\logs\services\HyS9Planning-sysout.log
Not sure how much information it will give though.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Public-yum ol6_latest Metadata file does not match checksum

Update: public-yum is working today and manual checksum is matching as well.
I am trying to apply the latest Oracle Linux 6 patches to a fresh 6.4 install from the public-yum. I am able to successfully apply the latest Oracle Linux 6 UEK from the ol6_UEK_latest repository on public-yum. I am unable to access the ol6_latest repository on public-yum because I receive a "Metadata file does not match checksum" error. I have attempted to manually verify the checksum and receive a mismatch as well. See below for more details.
Thanks,
Erick
$ ### clean up yum cache directory
$ yum clean all
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit, security
Cleaning repos: ol6_UEK_latest ol6_latest
Cleaning up Everything
$ ### attempt to check for updates
$ yum check-update
Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit, security
ol6_UEK_latest                                                                           | 1.2 kB     00:00
ol6_UEK_latest/primary                                                                   | 8.0 MB     00:00
ol6_UEK_latest                                                                                          183/183
ol6_latest                                                                               | 1.4 kB     00:00
ol6_latest/primary                                                                       | 29 MB     00:02
http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
ol6_latest/primary                                                                       | 29 MB     00:02
http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz: [Errno -1] Metadata file does not match checksum
Trying other mirror.
Error: failure: repodata/primary.xml.gz from ol6_latest: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try.
$ ### manually verify checksum by downloading gz for UEK repository
$ wget http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/UEK/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz
--2013-06-13 09:49:17-- http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/UEK/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz
Connecting to 10.87.79.250:8080... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 8409269 (8.0M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: “primary.xml.gz”
100%[======================================================================>] 8,409,269   11.1M/s   in 0.7s
2013-06-13 09:49:18 (11.1 MB/s) - “primary.xml.gz” saved [8409269/8409269]
$ ### now download xml for UEK repository
$ wget http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/UEK/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
--2013-06-13 09:52:14-- http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/UEK/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
Connecting to 10.87.79.250:8080... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1240 (1.2K) [text/xml]
Saving to: “repomd.xml”
100%[======================================================================>] 1,240       --.-K/s   in 0s
2013-06-13 09:52:14 (106 MB/s) - “repomd.xml” saved [1240/1240]
$ ### get published checksum from xml
$ grep -nA1 primary.xml repomd.xml
16:    <location href="repodata/primary.xml.gz"/>
17-    <checksum type="sha">c8fc85aa170c9da4a04e8a58ab594f67c319e874</checksum>
$ ### generate checksum for gz
$ sha1sum primary.xml.gz
c8fc85aa170c9da4a04e8a58ab594f67c319e874 primary.xml.gz
$ ### UEK checksums match, clean up UEK files from directory
$ rm primary.xml.gz repomd.xml
$ ### manually verify checksum by downloading gz for ol6 repository
$ wget http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz
--2013-06-13 10:04:59-- http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/primary.xml.gz
Connecting to 10.87.79.250:8080... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 30474994 (29M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: “primary.xml.gz”
100%[======================================================================>] 30,474,994 6.64M/s   in 4.5s
2013-06-13 10:05:04 (6.40 MB/s) - “primary.xml.gz” saved [30474994/30474994]
$ ### now download xml for ol6 repository
$ wget http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
--2013-06-13 10:05:10-- http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/OracleLinux/OL6/latest/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
Connecting to 10.87.79.250:8080... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 1429 (1.4K) [text/xml]
Saving to: “repomd.xml”
100%[======================================================================>] 1,429       --.-K/s   in 0s
2013-06-13 10:05:10 (55.7 MB/s) - “repomd.xml” saved [1429/1429]
$ ### get published checksum from xml
$ grep -nA1 primary.xml repomd.xml
16:    <location href="repodata/primary.xml.gz"/>
17-    <checksum type="sha">c8b3d8c353045b6e96f1eb6ed519c5d6e75faad3</checksum>
$ ### generate checksum for gz
$ sha1sum primary.xml.gz
47c33491455170c1460646ab3652e40087a4aa19 primary.xml.gz
$ ### ol6 checksums do not match, clean up ol6 files from directory
$ rm primary.xml.gz repomd.xml
$
Message was edited by: esigfrid

Thank you for your advice. Currently public-yum is working again for my two systems (without any changes on my side). If I run into this problem again I will give it a try.
Erick

AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file does not match data in the common datab...

We are receiving the following error everytime we logon our pc for the first time: Add-On Outlook_Integration: This Add-on cannot be upgraded. AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file does not match data in the common database for this add-on. See SAP Note 1323680 for more information.
A few months ago, SBO Server was moved from one server to a new virtual server, but we had no problems with the addons. The other day, we upgraded from SBO 2007 to 8.8 and now we are having problems with the Outlook Integration.
I have followed the directions in the message noted above, and did find the AddOnsLocalRegistration.sbo file in some odd places, with a reference to the old server. I cleaned this up, on the server and the client and I can get it running...however, after the user shuts down the pc and logs back in the next day, the problem is back.
In the process of cleaning this up (un-registering the addon and removing the addon references in the local .sbo file) I noticed at times that we would still receive this error, when there really shouldn't be an reference to it.
Thanks for any help.

Hi Vaughn.........
I guess you need a re installation of Outlook Integration Addon.
Whatever version addon of OI you installed just uninstall it and Install it freshly from 8.8 setup package......
Regards,
Rahul

JNI generated header file does not match the class file

We have had a JNI project for many years and all has been fine. Within our libraries we have several classes that have inner enum classes.
Recently we have moved to JDK1.7. Up to now when JNI generated the methods where the signature used the inner enum class, and it was an oveloaded method, we would get something like the following as the signature:
Java_PackageName_ClassName_methodName_OuterClass_00024InnerEnum_2
And the class file result of the build would look like the following:
methodName(OuterClass$InnerEnum)
Since we have moved to JDK 1.7 the header file looks like the following:
Java_PackageName_ClassName_methodName_OuterClasss_InnerEnum_2
The class file is still the same, and because of that when we run the program we get an UnsatisfiedLinkError. I understand that this error is because the VM cannot find the implementation. So why JDK 1.7 generates a header file that does not match the class file?
Thank you in advance.

I don't have 1.6 to verify but your statements about what is generated for 1.7 for the header appear correct.
The 000024 represents the '$' and for 1.7 the inner class is still named using '$'. So for example after compiling in 1.7 the inner class file is named the following...
MyClass$InnerEnum.class
So a one to one conversion should have kept the 000024 (presuming it does in fact do it that way in 1.6.)
You might want to look at the release notes for 1.7.
If you need a solution you could add a post javah step that renames the file.

Unique Identifier of the source style does not match the target st

I'm running into a bunch of problems with an export/import, but I'll limit myself to the more opaque ones for the moment. We've got a page group in place and are trying to overwrite it, or at least parts of it, with a revised version. The export appears to succeed, but the pre-check (and consequently, it appears, the entire import) fails. One of the few specific errors has to do with a style:
[ERROR] id = NULL context = style_pre_check user = PORTAL The Unique Identifier of the source style MY_STYLE does not match the target style MY_STYLE.
The style in question exists in both our development environment (from which we're exporting) and our target environment (into which we're importing, of course). It hasn't even been changed in the development environment, so it's identical to what it's replacing. Does anybody know what's going on here and how it might be fixed?

This indicates the style in the production did not come from the same development system as the one you're attempting the new import from. Also, this could happen, if for some reason you had deleted the style in the development after it was deployed to production and (re-) created a new style with the same name.
In order for pre-check to succeed, you would need to either rename the style on the production or rename it on development and re-export and import the transport set again.

SSIS OLE DB Data Source: literal does not match format string

Dear All,
this is my first post on this forum, so sorry if I choose wrong category for this question, but I stuck...
I'm using SSIS from SQL Server 2k8 R2 in Windows Server 2k8 R2. I have installed Oracle Client 10.2.0.2 32 bits and Oracle Client 10.2.0.4 64bits. I want to connect to Oracle 8i and Oracle 9i by these clients.
Unfortunately when I want to see a preview, only error occurs to me:
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string (OraOLEDB)
I have read a lot about this issue but nothing helps me (to_date, cast, convert etc.).
This is query which I use:
SELECT COMPANYID, TRANSACTIONTYPE, TRANSACTIONDATE,
PRODUCT, PRODUCTIONSITE, BATCHNUMBER,
BINNUMBER, QUANTITYSTOCKUNIT, QUANTITY,
UNITOFMEASURE, TRANSACTIONCURRENCYID, COST
FROM APPS.DW_PRODUCTION
WHERE TRANSACTIONDATE >= '20050101'
AND TRANSACTIONDATE < '99991231'I have investigated that the problem is with TRANSACTIONDATE column (which is VARCHAR2 data type in database).
I want also inform You that the same query in SSIS 2005 on Windows 2005 64 bits worked fine.
Could You help me to find a solution?
Thanks in advance,
Łukasz - chalunster
PS. Sorry for my english
Edited by: BluShadow on 16-May-2011 15:15
put {noformat}{noformat} tags into the message and encoded the < symbol so that it formats correctly.

user10450810 wrote:
Dear All,
this is my first post on this forum, so sorry if I choose wrong category for this question, but I stuck...
I'm using SSIS from SQL Server 2k8 R2 in Windows Server 2k8 R2. I have installed Oracle Client 10.2.0.2 32 bits and Oracle Client 10.2.0.4 64bits. I want to connect to Oracle 8i and Oracle 9i by these clients.
Unfortunately when I want to see a preview, only error occurs to me:
ORA-01861: literal does not match format string (OraOLEDB)
I have read a lot about this issue but nothing helps me (to_date, cast, convert etc.).
This is query which I use:
SELECT COMPANYID, TRANSACTIONTYPE, TRANSACTIONDATE,
PRODUCT, PRODUCTIONSITE, BATCHNUMBER,
BINNUMBER, QUANTITYSTOCKUNIT, QUANTITY,
UNITOFMEASURE, TRANSACTIONCURRENCYID, COST
FROM APPS.DW_PRODUCTION
WHERE TRANSACTIONDATE >= '20050101'
AND TRANSACTIONDATE < '99991231'
I have investigated that the problem is with TRANSACTIONDATE column (which is VARCHAR2 data type in database).
I want also inform You that the same query in SSIS 2005 on Windows 2005 64 bits worked fine.
Could You help me to find a solution?
Thanks in advance,
Łukasz - chalunster
PS. Sorry for my englishHi
Welcome to OTN Forums!
Are you sure you are using following code
SELECT COMPANYID, TRANSACTIONTYPE, TRANSACTIONDATE,
PRODUCT, PRODUCTIONSITE, BATCHNUMBER,
BINNUMBER, QUANTITYSTOCKUNIT, QUANTITY,
UNITOFMEASURE, TRANSACTIONCURRENCYID, COST
FROM APPS.DW_PRODUCTION
WHERE TRANSACTIONDATE >= '20050101'
AND TRANSACTIONDATE < 'If yes, then youistake is there,
WHERE TRANSACTIONDATE >= '20050101'
AND TRANSACTIONDATE < 'your script is not ended you can use this
WHERE TRANSACTIONDATE >= '20050101'
AND TRANSACTIONDATE < '20110101'or
WHERE to_date(TRANSACTIONDATE,'YYYYMMDD') >= to_date('20050101','YYYYMMDD')
AND to_date(TRANSACTIONDATE,'YYYYMMDD') < to_date('20110101','YYYYMMDD')Edited by: Mahir M. Quluzade on May 16, 2011 6:59 PM

Windows update fails to distribute to DP, source file does not exist

Hi,
Users reported they could not install Windows updates. Some hundred should get their updates mandatory end of this week. We found out the Windows update package did not get on the distribution points.
We tried to:
*update the distribution points, but that did not work
*deleted the package from the distribution point and tried to redistribute it but that did not work either
The logfile mentions that it cannot access the package or it doesn't exist: "\\ourdomain\SCCM\WindowsUpdates\d8b72e39-6103-49fb-b1f6-14e096dd3cd6" (doesn't exist and it does not indeed) or the SMS service
cannot access it.
STC00187 is our package with Windows updates.
Note: the package is > 24 GB in size. We did use
https://gallery.technet.microsoft.com/scriptcenter/Remove-Expired-Superseded-f35495e1
to cleanup expired updates.
Please advise howto troubleshoot. J.
Distmgr.log:
Skipping content d06c958a-2d7a-4b19-a140-e84cc9ac4c9c, 9865 KB, since snapshot for this content already exists...
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
STATMSG: ID=2376 SEV=I LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=oursccmserver.ourdomain SITE=STC PID=3596 TID=2680 GMTDATE=Tue Apr 21 12:38:12.094 2015 ISTR0="d06c958a-2d7a-4b19-a140-e84cc9ac4c9c"
ISTR1="" ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="STC00187"
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
Snapshot processing content with ID 16810274 ...
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12
2680 (0x0A78)
The source directory \\ourdomain\SCCM\WindowsUpdates\d8b72e39-6103-49fb-b1f6-14e096dd3cd6 doesn't exist or the SMS service cannot access it, Win32 last error = 2
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12
2680 (0x0A78)
STATMSG: ID=2306 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=oursccmserver.ourdomain SITE=STC PID=3596 TID=2680 GMTDATE=Tue Apr 21 12:38:12.100 2015 ISTR0="\\ourdomain\SCCM\WindowsUpdates\d8b72e39-6103-49fb-b1f6-14e096dd3cd6"
ISTR1="STC00187" ISTR2="30" ISTR3="94" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="STC00187"
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
Failed to take snapshot of one or more contents in package STC00187
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
CDistributionSrcSQL::UpdateAvailableVersion PackageID=STC00187, Version=66, Status=2302
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
STATMSG: ID=2302 SEV=E LEV=M SOURCE="SMS Server" COMP="SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER" SYS=oursccmserver.ourdomain SITE=STC PID=3596 TID=2680 GMTDATE=Tue Apr 21 12:38:12.131 2015 ISTR0="DPA - Windows Updates" ISTR1="STC00187"
ISTR2="" ISTR3="" ISTR4="" ISTR5="" ISTR6="" ISTR7="" ISTR8="" ISTR9="" NUMATTRS=1 AID0=400 AVAL0="STC00187"
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
Failed to process package STC00187 after 6 retries, will retry 94 more times
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12       2680 (0x0A78)
Exiting package processing thread for package STC00187.
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:12
2680 (0x0A78)
Currently using 0 out of 3 allowed package processing threads.
SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER
21/04/2015 14:38:15       2304 (0x0900)
Jan Hoedt

Reason of latest status (my latest update) was linked to same fact "The source directory \\ourdomain\SCCM\WindowsUpdates\d8b72e39-6103-49fb-b1f6-14e096dd3cd6 doesn't exist or the SMS service cannot access it,"
Thanks to :
http://www.mssccmfaq.de/2012/06/21/finde-das-software-update/ I found out it was a superseded update for Internet Explorer 8 which we don't use anyway. So I deleted it and distmgr.log continues now. However, the image above (latest update didn't change
to "in progress".
Just curious, can't I delete any superseded/expired update within the package?
Jan Hoedt
I see a lot of deletion events in distmgr.log, not sure what's hapening:
permanently deleting E66C3CB0DF5CE5F271B2EA933651D27976198028A3842839BF2E01EBC491D9E7 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:08 6920 (0x1B08)
permanently deleting 84C0FF7DDD94C4A5EC9CCEDF085C6D413D9E13C3DDEFCB719F21FBA70FF62ED9 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:10 6920 (0x1B08)
permanently deleting 631309DA8286AB99FF462572D8C05A51E585A7136AFB32B1A38FA1D53B351AD9 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:11 6920 (0x1B08)
permanently deleting F9B6D7EC5076D6F99C192789317EC68412EBAE6B5EB8B84F42C3E1FCAB0C5516 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:12 6920 (0x1B08)
permanently deleting 30EF6346D3F9ACCFF51A9742A60DAB3758EE3121A595C5D40EF1870D29AF15C2 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:13 6920 (0x1B08)
permanently deleting 724B8922B112EB79AF7ACBB39949AD7ACC0399B96D278E70061D4191D166CA00 SMS_DISTRIBUTION_MANAGER 22/04/2015 10:49:14 6920 (0x1B08)

Ipod Source Menu Does not Match Itunes7 library source list

Hi
Just upgraded to ITunes 7 last night and noticed that a view things has change.,
What I have noticed is, that my source menu in ITunes 7 is not the same as on the ipod.
as for example:
**Tv Shows appears as an item in the ITunes 7 source library, but does not show in the Ipod 5th generation source menu. **
In my ITunes 7 i can clearly see under tv shows an episode that i have of the the 4400. Itunes says it's also on my IPod.
So having to hunt around on the IPod first, i manage to find it under recent added content. I would've expected it to be at least under movies or something easier to access from the main menu.
Is there anyway to get the menu's to appear correctly on my IPod?
Many thanks

Hi
Just upgraded to ITunes 7 last night and noticed that a view things has change.,
What I have noticed is, that my source menu in ITunes 7 is not the same as on the ipod.
as for example:
**Tv Shows appears as an item in the ITunes 7 source library, but does not show in the Ipod 5th generation source menu. **
In my ITunes 7 i can clearly see under tv shows an episode that i have of the the 4400. Itunes says it's also on my IPod.
So having to hunt around on the IPod first, i manage to find it under recent added content. I would've expected it to be at least under movies or something easier to access from the main menu.
Is there anyway to get the menu's to appear correctly on my IPod?
Many thanks

Data in spool file does not match output.

This is a strange issue, and I'm not even sure it's a problem in SAP, but I don't know where else to ask and haven't found anything like it online:
We create pick lists on dot matrix printers. Occasionally, the output is missing a digit or character - for example in the middle of the delivery number. If delivery number is 81234567, the dot matrix output might be 8123467. The SAP spool file is not missing any data. And the paper dot matrix output is never skewed nor looks like it has jammed or "hiccuped". There is no space where the missing piece of data should be - it's all run together nice and neat. It occurs on different bits of data (sometimes, delivery#, name, batch, etc.), and it occurs on different printers at different sites. So far, it has always been only one digit or character missing every time it occurs. Reprint from the spool and it comes out fine.
So, SAP data is correct, and it occurs on different printers. Maybe it's a network issue? A printer buffer issue - but it happens on two different units, and that would be a weird coincidence. I really have no ides. Has anyone ever experienced anything like this?
Thanks,
Anke

Hello -
Difficult to answer accurately here as no access to spool data on the affected system and exact methods used. But, perhaps if you can print the RAW (OTF) data to a fileprinter and send that as a .txt file to the printer hardware vendor they could investigate why certain characters do not print.
Regards.

Exported video file does not match audio file in length?

I'm back with the same problem.
Here are the specs for this project:
Premiere Pro 5
Footage shot in HDV 1080i (Sony FX1)
Edited Timeline length...52:25
Destination: Blu-ray disc
I have tried both formats in the AME...MPEG2 Blu-ray and H.264 Blu-ray
I have tried every combination of Presets within these two formats...Match Attributes, 1440x1080i, HDTV....etc, etc, etc
The machine is spending anywhere from 7 hours to 27 hours to encode these files.
When I open the two files after the operation has finished, I find I have an audio file 52:25 in length and a video file 43:34, no matter what format or preset I have chosen!
Upon playback, you can imagine the frustration...within the first two minutes the two are out of sync.
What am I doing wrong here.
This is my first sortie into the HD world of Adobe. I've been doing Adobe Premiere SD for 10 years...and my deadline for the closed captioning is coming way too soon.
I appreciate any help you might offer.

Jim...Yes! I just did that this morning in frustration and by golly, they are both the same length. There is a note in the Project window after I copy to "Timeline" that says the video file is unencoded! Wierd! Another problem popped up in that the video and audio files are in different sequences in Encore. I cannot get them to play together. One will play and not the other...? I can't seem to drag them to the same sequence.
But, at least they are the same length! Mysteries in this HD business.

My source file does not stay in the same order when imported to Target

Hi Gurus,
I am importing a file using the LKM to SQL to a target datastore on Oracle. I am using the IKM SQL Control Append but my problem is in my target datastore the order that the flat file is in is not longer together. I added a ROWNUM column and triggered a sequence but the order from the flat file is still not the same as the table. I need the order to remain the same b/c during the load to Planning it holds the metadata order correctly.
Could someone give me a suggestion.
Thanks
Mike

Are you using the Planning Metadata load KM. If so there is an option on that KM Called Load by Input Order which repsects the order of your data in the source when loading to Planning

E301 Symbol type in value file does not match symbol type in layout

Hello Experts,
Please help me. I am getting this kind of error when I am trying to open a report in cg02 using Report From Template option.
Regards
Dheeraj

Dear Dheeraj
Regarding:I am facing this problem only with one specification. For the other specifications I am able to open the report properly from Report from Template option.
Please compare data from one spec to the other. One spec does have more data. This "more" data yield to the result that a different WWI code is used and this WWI code is not "ok" and therefore you get problems.
Regarding; "Maitain Parameter Values" => try to skip or write "hello world" or whatebver; parameter values are needed later; only on "rare" cases they have impact on the e.g. report from template creation so taht you get a problem
Regarding:
I tried creating the report but the report is not created.The status of the report is Error. i went to information tab and clicked on F6 Parameter Values. System has thrown a message saying "No Parameter Symbols found in the template". But system is trying to pass the parameter values. I think because of this I am getting error..
Either you have used the wrong symbol type or used wrong function module to assign it to a own developped report symbol. etc. Please check; what was the last change either in WWI code or in report symbol definition.
Some thread have shown that sometimes the report symbol is prepared as report type "01" but should be "02" (or the other way around). This is one reason for such issues
Only by doing it step by step and checking:
a.) what has been changed in template?
b.) what is the difference in data on sepc 1 in comparison to spec 2
You will succeed. Sorry to say: to debug WWI is not as simple as ABAP code. This is one reason why some developpers might get "frustrated" in WWI;
May be check: WWI for Beginners
as well
C.B.

(Minor?) Bug: ACR Preferences file does not match ACR version number

This may be of no major consequence (I don't know one way or the other) but the preferences file for ACR 4.2 on my Mac shows up as "Adobe Camera Raw 4.1 Prefs", even after trashing it and letting ACR rebuild it.

The question mark should have been after "Bug", I reckon. (As in "Bug?")
The reason I brought it up was that it has caused confusion to at least one user over at the Bridge Macintosh forum.
The Adobe Bridge team has been suggesting to purge the ACR cache as a means to alleviate a very significant bug in Bridge (it's showing the wrong thumbnail and preview in some instances, speciously calling up thumbnails and previews of totally unrelated images in very different folders).
Therefore, that user (and I suspect others) tried nuking the ACR preferences file as well.

"Source File does not match XML Schema"

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for