Source System Extraction taking more time

Hi All,
I Have an Issue, please help me out in this.
We have two source systems in our process. One is working fine. We dont have any issue with that. But another source system taking more time to extract the data in the source system than usual. From few days only we are facing this problem. Record count is also normal. I am unable find root cause for this, please help me out regarding this issue.
It is Full update. We are using Custom program to extract the data. It is running daily.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Suresh
Edited by: sureshd on Jul 14, 2011 6:04 PM
Edited by: sureshd on Jul 14, 2011 6:05 PM

When a long running job is running in the source system side you can trace it through ST05. Simultaneously you can monitor the screen of SM50/SM66 to see what are the tables being accessed during the job.
After the loading is completed, you can deactivate the trace and then go to the Display trace option where you would see various number of SQL statements along with their tables. Check which particular statement is an expensive one by looking at the time stamp.
Then next job is to decide why that table is being accessed for so much of time and how to improve the run time of the table. check the fields inside the table and their selectivity and see wether any index already exist on that. You can do this by going into SE11. If index is not available on those specific fields ask your Basis Guy to create a secondary one on top of it which may help in better performance. hope it helps.

Similar Messages

Post Goods Issue (VL06O) - taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hi
See Note 113048 - Collective note on delivery monitor and search notes related with performance.
Do a trace with tcode ST05 (look for help from a basis consultant) and search the bottleneck. Search possible sources of performance problems in userexits, enhancements and so on.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo

PGI Taking more time approximate 30 to 45 minutes

Dear Sir,
While doing post goods issue against delivery document system is taking lots of time, this issue is very very urgent can any one resolved or provide suitable solution for solving this issue.
We creates every day approximate 160 sales order / delivery and goods issue against the same by using transaction code VL06O system is taking more time for PGI.
Kindly provide suitable solution for the same.
Regards,
Vijay Sanguri

Hello Vijay,
I've just found the SAP Note 1459217 which definitively refers to your issue. Please have a look on it (see below the respective SAP note text).
In case you have question let me know!
Best Regards,
Marcel Mizt
Symptom
Long runtimes occur when using transaction VL06G or VL06O in order to post goods issue (PGI) deliveries.
Poor response times occur when using transaction VL06G or VL06O in order to PGI deliveries.
Poor performance occurs with transaction VL06G / VL06O.
Performance issues occur with transaction VL06G / VL06O.
Environment
SAP R/3 All Release Levels
Reproducing the Issue
Execute transaction VL06O.
Choose "For Goods Issue". (Transaction VL06G).
Long runtimes occur.
Cause
There are too many documents in the database that need to be accessed.
The customising settings in the activity "set updating of partner index" are not activated.
(IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Shipping -> Delivery List -> Set Updating Of Partner Index).
Resolution
If there are too many documents in the database to access, archiving them improves the performance of VL06G.
The customising settings in the activity "set updating of partner index" can be updated to improve the performance of VL06G. (IMG -> Logistics Execution -> Shipping -> Delivery List -> Set Updating Of Partner Index). In this transaction, check the entries for the transaction group 6 (= delivery). The effect of these settings is that the table VLKPA (SD index: deliveries by partner functions) is only filled with entries based on the partner functions listed (for example WE = ship-to party). In transaction VL060 the system is checking this customising in order to access the table VBPA or VLKPA.
If you change the settings of the activity "updating of partner index", run the report RVV05IVB to reorganize the index seleting only partner index in the delivery section of the screen. (see note 128947).
Flag the checkbox "display forwarding agent" (available in the display options section of the selection screen). When the list is generated, use the "set filter" functionality (menu path: edit -> set filter) in order to select the deliveries correspondng to one forwarding agent.

Custom Report taking more time to complete Normat

Hi All,
Custom report(Aging Report) in oracle is taking more time to complete Normal.
In one instance, the same report is taking 5 min and the other instance this is taking 40-50 min to complete.
We have enabled the trace and checked the trace file, but all the queries are working fine.
Could you please suggest me regarding this issue.
Thanks in advance!!

TKPROF: Release 10.1.0.5.0 - Production on Tue Jun 5 10:49:32 2012
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
count = number of times OCI procedure was executed
cpu = cpu time in seconds executing
elapsed = elapsed time in seconds executing
disk = number of physical reads of buffers from disk
query = number of buffers gotten for consistent read
current = number of buffers gotten in current mode (usually for update)
rows = number of rows processed by the fetch or execute call
Error in CREATE TABLE of EXPLAIN PLAN table: APPS.prof$plan_table
ORA-00922: missing or invalid option
parse error offset: 1049
EXPLAIN PLAN option disabled.
SELECT DISTINCT OU.ORGANIZATION_ID , OU.BUSINESS_GROUP_ID
FROM
HR_OPERATING_UNITS OU WHERE OU.SET_OF_BOOKS_ID =:B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
total 3 0.00 0.05 11 22 0 3
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
3 HASH UNIQUE (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=52023 us cost=10 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=22 pr=11 pw=0 time=61722 us)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=20 pr=11 pw=0 time=61672 us cost=9 size=66 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=18 pr=11 pw=0 time=61591 us cost=7 size=37 card=1)
3 NESTED LOOPS (cr=16 pr=11 pw=0 time=61531 us cost=7 size=30 card=1)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=11 pr=9 pw=0 time=37751 us cost=6 size=22 card=1)
18 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK1 (cr=1 pr=1 pw=0 time=17135 us cost=1 size=0 card=18)(object id 43610)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNITS (cr=5 pr=2 pw=0 time=18820 us cost=1 size=8 card=1)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_UNITS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 43657)
3 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN HR_ALL_ORGANIZATION_UNTS_TL_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=32 us cost=0 size=7 card=1)(object id 44020)
3 INDEX RANGE SCAN HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATIO_FK2 (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=52 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 330960)
3 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID HR_ORGANIZATION_INFORMATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=26 us cost=2 size=29 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 11 0.01 0.05
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
INSERT INTO FND_LOG_MESSAGES ( ECID_ID, ECID_SEQ, CALLSTACK, ERRORSTACK,
MODULE, LOG_LEVEL, MESSAGE_TEXT, SESSION_ID, USER_ID, TIMESTAMP,
LOG_SEQUENCE, ENCODED, NODE, NODE_IP_ADDRESS, PROCESS_ID, JVM_ID, THREAD_ID,
AUDSID, DB_INSTANCE, TRANSACTION_CONTEXT_ID )
VALUES
( SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_ID'), SYS_CONTEXT('USERENV', 'ECID_SEQ'),
:B16 , :B15 , SUBSTRB(:B14 ,1,255), :B13 , SUBSTRB(:B12 , 1, 4000), :B11 ,
NVL(:B10 , -1), SYSDATE, FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S.NEXTVAL, :B9 , SUBSTRB(:B8 ,1,
60), SUBSTRB(:B7 ,1,30), SUBSTRB(:B6 ,1,120), SUBSTRB(:B5 ,1,120),
SUBSTRB(:B4 ,1,120), :B3 , :B2 , :B1 ) RETURNING LOG_SEQUENCE INTO :O0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 20 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 21 0.00 0.03 4 1 304 20
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 LOAD TABLE CONVENTIONAL (cr=1 pr=4 pw=0 time=36498 us)
1 SEQUENCE FND_LOG_MESSAGES_S (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=24 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.01 0.03
SELECT MESSAGE_TEXT, MESSAGE_NUMBER, TYPE, FND_LOG_SEVERITY, CATEGORY,
SEVERITY
FROM
FND_NEW_MESSAGES M, FND_APPLICATION A WHERE :B3 = M.MESSAGE_NAME AND :B2 =
M.LANGUAGE_CODE AND :B1 = A.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME AND M.APPLICATION_ID =
A.APPLICATION_ID
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
total 5 0.00 0.03 4 12 0 2
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=2 pw=0 time=15724 us cost=3 size=134 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=20 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_NEW_MESSAGES (cr=4 pr=2 pw=0 time=15693 us cost=2 size=125 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_NEW_MESSAGES_PK (cr=3 pr=1 pw=0 time=6386 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 34367)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 4 0.00 0.03
DELETE FROM MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.02 3 4 4 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
0 DELETE MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=4 pr=3 pw=0 time=29161 us)
1 TABLE ACCESS FULL MO_GLOB_ORG_ACCESS_TMP (cr=3 pr=2 pw=0 time=18165 us cost=2 size=13 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
db file sequential read 3 0.01 0.02
SET TRANSACTION READ ONLY
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
begin Fnd_Concurrent.Init_Request; end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 148 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
declare X0rv BOOLEAN; begin X0rv := FND_INSTALLATION.GET(:APPL_ID,
:DEP_APPL_ID, :STATUS, :INDUSTRY); :X0 := sys.diutil.bool_to_int(X0rv);
end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 9 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 8 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 8 0.00 0.00
begin fnd_global.bless_next_init('FND_PERMIT_0000');
fnd_global.initialize(:session_id, :user_id, :resp_id, :resp_appl_id,
:security_group_id, :site_id, :login_id, :conc_login_id, :prog_appl_id,
:conc_program_id, :conc_request_id, :conc_priority_request, :form_id,
:form_application_id, :conc_process_id, :conc_queue_id, :queue_appl_id,
:server_id); fnd_profile.put('ORG_ID', :org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_ORGANIZATION_ID', :mfg_org_id);
fnd_profile.put('MFG_CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID', :coa);
fnd_profile.put('APPS_MAINTENANCE_MODE', :amm); end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
total 2 0.00 0.00 0 8 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 1 0.00 0.00
SELECT FPI.STATUS, FPI.INDUSTRY, FPI.PRODUCT_VERSION, FOU.ORACLE_USERNAME,
FPI.TABLESPACE, FPI.INDEX_TABLESPACE, FPI.TEMPORARY_TABLESPACE,
FPI.SIZING_FACTOR
FROM
FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS FPI, FND_ORACLE_USERID FOU, FND_APPLICATION FA
WHERE FPI.APPLICATION_ID = FA.APPLICATION_ID AND FPI.ORACLE_ID =
FOU.ORACLE_ID AND FA.APPLICATION_SHORT_NAME = :B1
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
total 4 0.00 0.00 0 7 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=7 pr=0 pw=0 time=89 us)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=93 us cost=4 size=76 card=1)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=5 pr=0 pw=0 time=77 us cost=3 size=67 card=1)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_APPLICATION (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=19 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_APPLICATION_U3 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=9 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 33993)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS (cr=3 pr=0 pw=0 time=51 us cost=2 size=58 card=1)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN FND_PRODUCT_INSTALLATIONS_PK (cr=2 pr=0 pw=0 time=27 us cost=1 size=0 card=1)(object id 22583)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN FND_ORACLE_USERID_U1 (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=0 size=0 card=1)(object id 22597)
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID FND_ORACLE_USERID (cr=1 pr=0 pw=0 time=7 us cost=1 size=9 card=1)
SELECT P.PID, P.SPID, AUDSID, PROCESS, SUBSTR(USERENV('LANGUAGE'), INSTR(
USERENV('LANGUAGE'), '.') + 1)
FROM
V$SESSION S, V$PROCESS P WHERE P.ADDR = S.PADDR AND S.AUDSID =
USERENV('SESSIONID')
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 3 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 173 (recursive depth: 1)
Rows Row Source Operation
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1883 us cost=1 size=108 card=2)
1 HASH JOIN (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1869 us cost=1 size=100 card=2)
1 NESTED LOOPS (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=1059 us cost=0 size=58 card=2)
182 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSLWT (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=285 us cost=0 size=1288 card=161)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSUSE (ind:1) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=617 us cost=0 size=21 card=1)
181 FIXED TABLE FULL X$KSUPR (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=187 us cost=0 size=10500 card=500)
1 FIXED TABLE FIXED INDEX X$KSLED (ind:2) (cr=0 pr=0 pw=0 time=4 us cost=0 size=4 card=1)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 2 0.00 0.00
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL NON-RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 6 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 6 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 4
Fetch 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 1
total 13 0.01 0.02 0 165 0 5
Misses in library cache during parse: 0
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 37 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 37 1.21 2.19
log file sync 1 0.01 0.01
OVERALL TOTALS FOR ALL RECURSIVE STATEMENTS
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
Parse 49 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 89 0.01 0.07 7 38 336 24
Fetch 29 0.00 0.09 15 168 0 27
total 167 0.02 0.16 22 206 336 51
Misses in library cache during parse: 3
Misses in library cache during execute: 1
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
asynch descriptor resize 6 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 22 0.01 0.14
48 user SQL statements in session.
1 internal SQL statements in session.
49 SQL statements in session.
0 statements EXPLAINed in this session.
Trace file compatibility: 10.01.00
Sort options: prsela exeela fchela
1 session in tracefile.
48 user SQL statements in trace file.
1 internal SQL statements in trace file.
49 SQL statements in trace file.
48 unique SQL statements in trace file.
928 lines in trace file.
1338833753 elapsed seconds in trace file.

CDP Performance Issue-- Taking more time fetch data

Hi,
I'm working on Stellent 7.5.1.
For one of the portlet in portal its taking more time to fetch data. Please can some one help me to solve this issue.. So that performance can be improved.. Please kindly provide me solution.. This is my code for fetching data from the server....
public void getManager(final HashMap binderMap)
throws VistaInvalidInputException, VistaDataNotFoundException,
DataException, ServiceException, VistaTemplateException
     String collectionID =
getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants.FOLDER_ID_KEY);
     long firstStartTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
HashMap resultSetMap = null;
String isNonRecursive = getStringLocal(VistaFolderConstants
.ISNONRECURSIVE_KEY);
if (isNonRecursive != null
&& isNonRecursive.equalsIgnoreCase(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.STRING_TRUE))
VistaLibraryContentFetchManager libraryContentFetchManager =
new VistaLibraryContentFetchManager(
binderMap);
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
          resultSetMap = libraryContentFetchManager
.getFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
* used to add the resultset to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , true);
else
     long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
* isStandard is used to decide the call is for Standard or
* Extended.
SystemUtils.trace(
VistaContentFetchHelperConstants.CONTENT_FETCH_TRACE,
"The input Parameters for Content Fetch = "
+ binderMap);
String isStandard = getTemplateInformation(binderMap);
long endTimeTemplate = System.currentTimeMillis();
binderMap.put(VistaFolderConstants.IS_STANDARD,
isStandard);
long endTimebinderMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
VistaContentFetchManager contentFetchManager
= new VistaContentFetchManager(binderMap);
long endTimeFetchManager = System.currentTimeMillis();
resultSetMap = contentFetchManager
.getAllFolderContentItems(m_workspace);
long endTimeresultSetMap = System.currentTimeMillis();
* used to add the resultset and the total no of content items
* to the binder.
addResultSetToBinder(resultSetMap , false);
long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
if (perfLogEnable.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
     Log.info("Time taken to execute " +
               "getTemplateInformation=" +
               (endTimeTemplate - startTime)+
               "ms binderMap=" +
               (endTimebinderMap - startTime)+
               "ms contentFetchManager=" +
               (endTimeFetchManager - startTime)+
               "ms resultSetMap=" +
               (endTimeresultSetMap - startTime) +
               "ms getManager:getAllFolderContentItems = " +
               (endTime - startTime) +
               "ms overallTime=" +
               (endTime - firstStartTime) +
               "ms folderID =" +
               collectionID);
Edited by: 838623 on Feb 22, 2011 1:43 AM

Hi.
The Select statment accessing MSEG Table is Slow Many a times.
To Improve the performance of MSEG.
1.Check for the proper notes in the Service Market Place if you are working for CIN version.
2.Index the MSEG table
2.Check and limit the Columns in the Select statment .
Possible Way.
SELECT MBLNR MJAHR ZEILE BWART MATNR WERKS LIFNR MENGE MEINS
EBELN EBELP LGORT SMBLN BUKRS GSBER INSMK XAUTO
FROM MSEG
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB
WHERE WERKS EQ P_WERKS AND
MBLNR IN S_MBLNR AND
BWART EQ '105' .
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002361303'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003501080'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996300'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002996407'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003587026'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5003493186'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002720583'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002928122'
Delete itab where itab EQ '5002628263'.
Select
Regards
Bala.M
Edited by: Bala Malvatu on Feb 7, 2008 9:18 PM

Report rdf with size 8mb taking more time to open

Hello All,
I have a rdf ( reports 6i) report with size 8.5mb taking more time to open and more time to access each field.
Please let me know how do i solve this issue.
Please do the needful.
Thanks.

Thanks for immediate response.
pls let me know how do i know this.
Right now i have the below details from report->help
Report Builder 6.0.8.11.3
ORACLE Server Release 8.0.6.0.0
Oracle Procedure Builder 6.0.8.11.0
Oracle ORACLE PL/SQL V8.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle CORE Version 4.0.6.0.0 - Production
Oracle Tools Integration Services 6.0.8.10.2
Oracle Tools Common Area 6.0.5.32.1
Oracle Toolkit 2 for Windows 32-bit platforms 6.0.5.35.0
Resource Object Store 6.0.5.0.1
Oracle Help 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Sqlmgr 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Query Builder 6.0.7.0.0 - Production
PL/SQL Editor (c) WinMain Software (www.winmain.com), v1.0 (Production)
Oracle ZRC 6.0.8.11.3
Oracle Express 6.0.8.3.5
Oracle XML Parser 1.0.2.1.0 Production
Oracle Virtual Graphics System 6.0.5.35.0
Oracle Image 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Multimedia Widget 6.0.5.34.0
Oracle Tools GUI Utilities 6.0.5.35.0
Thanks
Edited by: Abdul Khan on Jan 26, 2010 11:54 PM

Expdp taking more time to start export

Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
If share me tips and let me know the reason
Regards
Rabi

user623166 wrote:
Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
I am not sure that this is enough information for us to suggest something. For starters, can you try selecting less tables than 120 and see what's going on?
Aman....

Oracle Drop command taking more time in AIX When compared to Windows

Hi
We are firing a normal Drop command on our database and the databse version is 10.2.0.4.The catabase is running on AIX v5.The command is taking more time than usual .
There are no waits on session.Let me try to put the scenario in more simple terms.I have a nested table NT_TEST with record count 0 and i am dropping the statement using "Drop table NT_TEST" in windows it is getting dropped say some 218 Milli seconds.
The same table when i am dropping it in AIX it is taking around 6 seconds.
There are no locks ,Flashback is off,Triggers are not involved.Drop is not waiting on any transaction to complete.
Could anybody help me out on this.

Quite possible. On most Unixes asynchronous I/O requires purchasing extra options, and most sites just purchase the default O/S. Or asynchronous I/O is not enabled by default or the database is located on an ufs file system.
You provided no info at all on your AIX configuration. AIX does have asynchronous I/O, it is not always enabled, and the number of slaves is usually way too low.
As root, run smit aio and report the results.
At his point your unfavorable comparison of Windows and AIX is quite unfair. Unix doesn't run out of the box.
You know that famous joke 'If operating systems were airplanes'?
In that joke, the Unix airplane is assembled on the spot, but the Windows airplane is three months late.
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Suddenly ODI scheduled executions taking more time than usual.

Hi,
I have set ODI packages scheduled for execution.
From some days those are taking more time to execute themselves.
Before they used to take 1 hr 30 mins approx.
Now they are taking 3 - 3 hr 15 mins approx.
And there no any major change in data in terms of Quantity.
My ODI version s
Standalone Edition Version 11.1.1
Build ODI_11.1.1.3.0_GENERIC_100623.1635
ODI packages are mainly using Oracle as SOURCE and TARGET DB.
What things should i check to get to know reasons of sudden increase in time of execution.
Any pointers regarding this would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Mahesh

Mahesh,
Use some repository queries to retrieve the session task timings and compare your slow execution to a previous acceptable execution, then look for the biggest changes - this will highlight where you are slowing down, then its off to tune the item accordingly.
See here for some example reports , you might need to tweak for your current repos version but I dont think the table structures have changed that much :
http://rnm1978.wordpress.com/2010/11/03/analysing-odi-batch-performance/

Taking more time to save report or prompt

Hi All,
When am saving report or prompt taking more time. When i tried to keep filter on Business Month column in report and when i click on All Choices in Filter to select particular value it is taking nearly 50 sec to get the values, hardly it contains 100 values in Business Month column. Please can any body let me know why this is taking more time to retrive the data in filter,saving report and prompt.
Any suggestions/help will be appreciated.
Regards,
Rajkumar.

Hi Rajkumar.
Is the source for your prompt a fact table or a dimensional table? Do you have indexes on the column in the database?
regards
John
http://obiee101.blogspot.com/

Issue with background job--taking more time

Hi,
We have a custom program which runs as the background job. It runs every 2 hours.
Itu2019s taking more time than expected on ECC6 SR2 & SR3 on Oracle 10.2.0.4. We found that it taking more time while executing native SQL on DBA_EXTENTS. When we tried to fetch less number of records from DBA_EXTENTS, it works fine.
But we need the program to fetch all the records.
But it works fine on ECC5 on 10.2.0.2 & 10.2.0.4.
Here is the SQL statement:
EXEC SQL PERFORMING SAP_GET_EXT_PERF.
SELECT OWNER, SEGMENT_NAME, PARTITION_NAME,
         SEGMENT_TYPE, TABLESPACE_NAME,
         EXTENT_ID, FILE_ID, BLOCK_ID, BYTES
   FROM SYS.DBA_EXTENTS
   WHERE OWNER LIKE 'SAP%'
   INTO
   : EXTENTS_TBL-OWNER, :EXTENTS_TBL-SEGMENT_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-PARTITION_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-SEGMENT_TYPE , :EXTENTS_TBL-TABLESPACE_NAME,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-EXTENT_ID, :EXTENTS_TBL-FILE_ID,
   :EXTENTS_TBL-BLOCK_ID, :EXTENTS_TBL-BYTES
ENDEXEC.
Can somebody suggest what has to be done?
Has something changed in SAP7 (wrt background job etc) or do we need to fine tune the SQL statement?
Regards,
Vivdha

Hi,
there was an issue with LMT's but that was fixed in 10.2.0.4
besides missing system statistics:
But WHY do you collect every 2 hours this information? The dba_extents view is based on really heavy used system tables.
Normally , you would start queries of this type against dba_extents ie. to identify corrupt blocks and such:
SELECT owner , segment_name , segment_type
        FROM dba_extents
       WHERE file_id = &AFN
         AND &BLOCKNO BETWEEN block_id AND block_id + blocks -1
Not sure what you want to achieve with it.
There are monitoring tools (OEM ?) around that may cover your needs.
Bye
yk

Recover Database is taking more time for first archived redo log file

Hai,
Environment Used :
Hardware : IBM p570 machine with P6 processor Lpar of .5 CPU and 2.5 GB Ram
OS : AIX 5.3 ML 07
Cluster: HACMP 5.4.1.2
Oracle Version: 9.2.0.4 RAC
SAN : DS8100 from IBM
I have used flash copy option to copy the database from production to test machine. Then tried to recover the database to an consistent state using the command "recover automatic database until cancel". System is taking long time and after viewing the alert log it was found that, for the first time, if it is reading all the datafiles and it is taking 3 seconds for each datafile. Since i have more than 500 datafiles, it is nearly taking 25 mins for applying the first archived redo log file. All other log files are applied immeidately without any delay. Any suggession to improve the speed will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sridhar

After chaning the LPAR settings with 2 CPU and 5GB RAM, the problem solved.

Level1 backup is taking more time than Level0

The Level1 backup is taking more time than Level0, I really am frustated how could it happen. I have 6.5GB of database. Level0 took 8 hrs but level1 is taking more than 8hrs . please help me in this regard.

Ogan Ozdogan wrote:
Charles,
By enabling the block change tracking will be indeed faster than before he have got. I think this does not address the question of the OP unless you are saying the incremental backup without the block change tracking is slower than a level 0 (full) backup?
Thank you in anticipating.
OganOgan,
I can't explain why a 6.5GB level 0 RMAN backup would require 8 hours to complete (maybe a very slow destination device connected by 10Mb/s Ethernet) - I would expect that it should complete in a couple of minutes.
An incremental level 1 backup without a block change tracking file could take longer than a level 0 backup. I encountered a good written description of why that could happen, but I can't seem to locate the source at the moment. The longer run time might have been related to the additional code paths required to constantly compare the SCN of each block, and the variable write rate which may affect some devices, such as a tape device.
A paraphrase from the book "Oracle Database 10g RMAN Backup & Recovery"
"Incremental backups must check the header of each block to discover if it has changed since the last incremental backup - that means an incremental backup may not complete much faster than a full backup."
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Re : BSP App. taking More Time for Processing

Hi,
   We are using WAS 620 , created a bsp application to create trips thru bdc's.
   In our development system its going fine but in our quality system its taking more that 10 mins for posting.
When we check thru SM04 the icm session and icm req session are there for long time.
   Is there any setting to do with icm for executing bdc's/posting programs.
Looking for help from u all to solve this issue....
Thanks and Regards,
K Vijayasekar.

Check out this weblog to get you started:
/people/mark.finnern/blog/2003/09/24/bsp-in-depth-confusion-between-stateless-stateful-and-authentication

LCM utility taking more time to start

Hi All,
In Hyperion System 9.3.1 when running the LCMUtility.bat file in Hyperion Home\BIPLUS\bin folder it is taking nearly 8-10 minutes to start up the process. The shared services, IR, Core services are in the single box. Even though it is taking time to initialize, it ends with success.
Could anyone please let me know what could be the possible reason why it is taking 8-10 minutes of time to start the process?
Thanks,
Sree

user623166 wrote:
Hi Gurus
my database oracle 10.2.0.3 in AIX
I have started expdp to export selective around 130 tables but it is taking more time to start , almost 20 min passed since it start.
$ expdp system/*** parfile=parfile.par
Export: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production on Friday, 22 June, 2012 17:21:26
Copyright (c) 2003, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connected to: Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
Starting "SYSTEM"."SYS_EXPORT_TABLE_02": system/******** parfile=parfile.par
Estimate in progress using BLOCKS method...
Processing object type TABLE_EXPORT/TABLE/TABLE_DATA
I am not sure that this is enough information for us to suggest something. For starters, can you try selecting less tables than 120 and see what's going on?
Aman....

Source System Extraction taking more time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for