Recover Database is taking more time for first archived redo log file

Hai,
Environment Used :
Hardware : IBM p570 machine with P6 processor Lpar of .5 CPU and 2.5 GB Ram
OS : AIX 5.3 ML 07
Cluster: HACMP 5.4.1.2
Oracle Version: 9.2.0.4 RAC
SAN : DS8100 from IBM
I have used flash copy option to copy the database from production to test machine. Then tried to recover the database to an consistent state using the command "recover automatic database until cancel". System is taking long time and after viewing the alert log it was found that, for the first time, if it is reading all the datafiles and it is taking 3 seconds for each datafile. Since i have more than 500 datafiles, it is nearly taking 25 mins for applying the first archived redo log file. All other log files are applied immeidately without any delay. Any suggession to improve the speed will be highly appreciated.
Regards
Sridhar

After chaning the LPAR settings with 2 CPU and 5GB RAM, the problem solved.

Similar Messages

ADF application taking more time for first time and less from second time

Hi Experts,
We are using ADF 11.1.1.2.
Our application contains 5 jsp pages, 10 - 12 taskflows, and 50 jsff pages.
For the first time in the day if we use the application it is taking more than 60 sec on some actions.
And from the next time onwords it is taking 5 to 6 sec.
Same thing is happening daily.
Can any one tell me why this application is taking more time for first time and less time from second time.
Regards
Gayaz

Hi,
If you don't restart you WLS every day, then you should read about Tuning Application Module Pools and Connection Pools
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcampool.htm#sm0301
And pay attention to the parameter: Maximum Available Size, Minimum Available Size
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcampool.htm#sm0314
And adjust them to suit your needs.

Currency translation taking more time at first time in the report

Hi All,
Here is an issue regarding the currency translation in the report. when we click on the currency translation from the contaxt menu on the report, its taking more time for the first time to get the selection options. But it is fast from the second time onwards. It will be not user friendly if its takes more time for the first time. Is there any way to fast up the processing time for the first time when i go for the "currency translation" option at report level for the first time.
let me know why it takes more time for the first time when we go for this option at report level.
Thanks,
Jack

Once again from the top.
This is undoubtedly not a database issue.
I doubt you can fix it in the database.
You can, however, spend a lot of hours asking questions and poking around if you are a consultant paid by the hour.
But as long as you are looking for something to do here are some that won't fix the problem but may be worth a few minutes of your time.
WHERE 1 = 1Are you kidding? Drop this nonsense. The Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. If it were my database I would also drop the parallel hint like a bad habit.
/*+ parallel(rp1, 8) */Again the Oracle optimizer is not brain dead. Ask for parallel threads that don't exist and the database will just queue your SQL and let it sit there until sufficient resources become available.

Procedure is taking more time for execution

hi,
when i am trying to execute the below procedure it is taking more time for
execution.
can you pls suggest the possaible ways to tune the query.
PROCEDURE sp_sel_cntr_ri_fact (
po_cntr_ri_fact_cursor OUT t_cursor
IS
BEGIN
OPEN po_cntr_ri_fact_cursor FOR
SELET c_RI_fAt_id, c_RI_fAt_code,c_RI_fAt_nme,
     case when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_CRF_PARAM_CALIB t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
     then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_EMPI_ERV_CALIB_DETAIL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CNTRY_IC_CRF_MPG_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_CNTRYIDX_MPG_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_RESI_COR t WHERE t.x_axis_c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_IC_CRF_RESI_COR t WHERE t.y_axis_c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM A_PAR_MARO_GAMMA_PRIME_CALIB t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM D_ANALYSIS_FAT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM D_CALIB_CNTRY_RI_FATOR t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_BUSI_PORT_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CNTRY_LOSS_DIST_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CNTRY_LOSS_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CRF_BUS_PORTFOL_CRITERIA t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_CRF_CORR_RSLT t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
               when exists (SELET 'x' FROM E_HYPO_PORTF_DTL t WHERE t.c_RI_fAt_id = A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT.c_RI_fAt_id)
               then 'Yes'
          else
               'No'
     end used_analysis_ind,
     creation_date, datetime_stamp, user_id
     FROM A_IC_CNTR_RI_FAT
ORDER BY c_RI_fAt_id_nme DESC;
END sp_sel_cntr_ri_fact;

[When your query takes too long...|http://forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?messageID=1812597]

Self Service Password Registration Page taking more time for loading in FIM 2010 R2

Hi,
I have beeen successfullly installed FIM 2010 R2 SSPR and it is working fine
but my problem is that Self Service Password Registration Page taking more time for loading when i provide Window Credential,it is taking approximate 50 to 60 Seconds for loading a page in FIM 2010 R2
very urgent requirement.
Regards
Anil Kumar

Double check that the objectSid, accountname and domain is populated for the users in the FIM portal, and each user is connected to their AD counterparts
Check here for more info:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/20213.troubleshooting-fim-sspr-error-3003-the-current-user-account-is-not-recognized-by-forefront-identity-manager-please-contact-your-help-desk-or-system-administrator.aspx

Hoping for a quick response : EXP and Archived REDO log files

I apologize in advance if this question has been asked and answered 100 times. I admit I didn't search, I don't have time. I'm leaving on vacation tomorrow, and I need to know if I'm correct about something to do with backup / restore.
we have 10g R2 running a single instance on a single server. The application vendor has "embedded" oracle with their application. The vendor's backup is a batch file using EXP - thus:
exp system/xpwdxx@db full=y file=D:\Orant\admin\db\EXP\db_full.dmp log=D:\Orant\admin\db\EXP\db_full.txt direct=y compress=y
This command is executed nightly at midnight. The files are then backed up by our nightly backup to offsite storage media.
Te database is running in autoarchive mode. The problem is, the archived redo files filled the drive they were being stored on, and it is the drive the database is on. I used OS commands to move 136G of archived redo logs onto other storage media to free the drive.
My question: Since the EXP runs at midnight, when there is likely NO activity, do I need to run in AutoArchive Mode? From what I have read, you cannot even apply archived redo log files to this type of backup strategy (IMP) Is that true? We are ok losing changes since our last EXP. I have read a lot of stuff about restoring consistent vs. inconsistent, and just need to know: If my disk fails, and I have to start with a clean install of Oracle and nothing else, can I IMP this EXP and get back up and running as of the last EXP? Or do I need the autoarchived redo log files back to July 2009 (136G of them).
Hoping for a quick response
Best Regards, and thanks in advance
Bruce Davis

Bruce Davis wrote:
Amardeep Sidhu
Thank you for your quick reply. I am reading in the other responses that since I am using EXP without consistent=y, I might not even have a backup. The application vendor said that with this dmp file they can restore us to the most recent backup. I don't really care for this strategy as it is untested. I asked them to verify that they could restore us and they said they tested the dmp file and it was OK.
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
Best Regards
BruceThe dump file is probably ok in the sense it is not corrupted and can be used in an imp operation. That doesn't mean the data in it is transactionally consistent. And to use it at all, you have to have a database up and running. If the database is physically corrupted, you'll have to rebuild a new database from scratch before you can even think about using your dmp file.
Vendors never understand databases. I once had a vendor tell me that Oracle's performance would be intolerable if there were more than 5 concurrent connections. Well, maybe in HIS product ..... Discussions terminated quickly after he made that statement.

Taking more time for retreving data from nested table

Hi
we have two databases db1 and db2,in database db2 we have number of nested tables were there.
Now the problem is we had link between two databases,whenever u firing the any query in db1 internally it's going to acces nested tables in db2.
For feching records it's going to take much more time even records are less in table . what would be the reason.
plz help me daliy we are facing the problem regarding the same

Please avoid duplicate thread :
quaries taking more time
Nicolas.
+< mod. action : thread locked>+

Taking more time for loading Real Cost estimates

Dear Experts,
It is taking more time to load data into cude CO-PC: Product Cost Planning - Released Cost Estimates(0COPC_C09).The update mode is "Full Update"There are only 105607 records.For other areas there are more than this records,but it gets loaded easily.
I have problem only to this 0COPC_C09.Could anybody can guide me?.
Rgds
ACE

suresh.ratnaji wrote:
NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
_optimizer_cost_based_transformation string      OFF
filesystemio_options                 string      asynch
object_cache_optimal_size            integer     102400
optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
optimizer_features_enable            string      10.2.0.4
optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
optimizer_mode                       string      choose
optimizer_secure_view_merging        boolean     TRUE
plsql_optimize_level                 integer     2
please let me know why it taking more time in INDEX RANGE SCAN compare to the full table scan?Suresh,
Any particular reason why you have a non-default value for a hidden parameter, optimizercost_based_transformation ?
On my 10.2.0.1 database, its default value is "linear". What happens when you reset the value of the hidden parameter to default?

Query on DSO is taking more time for current month

Hi All,
I have query bulit on DSO is running fine for all the month, but only the problem with ccurrent month. For April is taking more than 15 min to run query though it got less records. For other month is taking less than one sec. Could you help me to resolve the issue.
Regards,
J B

Hi JB,
Same problem we are facing. Last month users ran till from 01.03.2011 to 15.03.2011 around 17.03.2011 even the data volume is less it is running slow or some times not coming. This month it is slow for 01.04.2011 to 11.04.2011 ...
I am also weird, and this is happening after latest patch implementation.I am not exactly sure why it happens.
The fix we have done is restricted in the backend on that date from 01.01.1900 - 31.12.9999 and now allowed filter again on the same date. Now if we use the same date range it is running fine.
Also try if you inpit 01.01.2011 - 31.12.2011 and check the time whether it is running fast or not....it is running normal ...
Regards
vamsi

Re : BSP App. taking More Time for Processing

Hi,
   We are using WAS 620 , created a bsp application to create trips thru bdc's.
   In our development system its going fine but in our quality system its taking more that 10 mins for posting.
When we check thru SM04 the icm session and icm req session are there for long time.
   Is there any setting to do with icm for executing bdc's/posting programs.
Looking for help from u all to solve this issue....
Thanks and Regards,
K Vijayasekar.

Check out this weblog to get you started:
/people/mark.finnern/blog/2003/09/24/bsp-in-depth-confusion-between-stateless-stateful-and-authentication

ME2O taking more time for execution

This has been found sometime ME2O takes very long time for execution. Please refer the below screen shot for selection.
If you provide the component no, the search time is little less. But still sometimes the execution take more than expected time. This is because SAP standard program search all the deliveries even though these are completed.
There is SAP note:1815460 - ME2O: Selection of delivery very slow. This will help to improve the execution time a lot.
Regards,
Krishnendu.

THanks for sharing this information,

One database user taking more time to connect

Hi All,
I have a question,
I have a database say 500GB and I have around 50 schemas in this database.But there is one User that takes more than normal time to connect to the database.
What can be the reason for this and what should be my apprach to look for the problem where it could possibly be.
Regards,
Sphinx

yes, check for online trigger if none there put your own on logon trigger on a normal user and your issue user. do a 10046, examine the trace files, everything the user is doing will be in it.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER SYS.set_trace
AFTER LOGON ON DATABASE
WHEN (USER in 'GOODUSER','BADUSER')
DECLARE
lcommand varchar(200);
BEGIN
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'alter session set statistics_level=ALL';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'alter session set max_dump_file_size=UNLIMITED';
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'alter session set events ''10046 trace name context forever, level 12''';
END set_trace;
/tkprof the trace files, whats the difference between good and bad.
moneys on a trigger though.

Sub VI to enter database data taking more time when calling from main VI

Hi All,
I created a sub vi to enter data to a new database, after reading from another database. when i executed that sub vi alone, it took only 2 minutes to enter 20000 records. But when i called that sub VI from my main VI, its taking 35 minutes to enter 20000 records.
my maiin vi has another while loop running parallelly which will perform some other operations. How to handle memory in this case? i mean when i call my sub vi from main vi, i need to give complete processor memory for that sub vi. is it possible?
please help. thanks in advance.
Sooraj

Hi Oliver,
in your example the numeric data is passed from sub-vi to main only when sub-vi terminates, this is what it's supposed to be when you fetch the data from the connector output of a sub-vi.
You can use queues function to exchange data between sub-vi and main.vi; take a look at the example Message Logging with Named Queue.vi.
An alternative method is passing to sub-vi a reference of an indicator (or control) and update its value on the fly.
See example.
Alberto
Attachments:
passing_data_from_sub-vi.llb ‏35 KB

Database shutdown taking more time, is listener process a problem??

Dear all,
though its a general process to stop the listener before shutting down the database for cold backup. but is it so that if you don't stop the listener before giving shutdown immediate command, the shutdown process takes long time than normal expected time?
because as per my understanding, the listener process is used just for the connection and when we give shutdown command the database automatically rejects any new connections. your valuable comments are required.

No version, as usual, and the answer is version specific.
Why is it so difficult to include those 4 digits?
Dear all,
though its a general process to stop the listener
before shutting down the database for cold backup.
but is it so that if you don't stop the listener
before giving shutdown immediate command, the
shutdown process takes long time than normal expected
time? No. Must be a fairy tale without proof.
You might need set job_queue_processes to 0 and aq_tm_processes to 0, but that has nothing to do with the listener.
>
because as per my understanding, the listener process
is used just for the connection and when we give
shutdown command the database automatically rejects
any new connections. your valuable comments are
required.--
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA

Taking more time for job execution

Hi experts,
there is one job executing on daily.
generally it takes around 5 min.
but yesterday it took 50 min.
can anybody tell why it is happened on that particular day

hi,
u cannot tell exactly y it happened.
it depends on several reasons like
1. the server may be down
2. the data may be large
also somtimes even the data is same the time taken will be different.it depends on the load on work process also.if workprocess is free it may finish quickly or it may delay.
u can check workprocess overview in sm50.
<REMOVED BY MODERATOR>
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Jun 12, 2008 4:12 PM

Recover Database is taking more time for first archived redo log file

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for