Specific scenario in AP

Can someone tell me his/her experience about a specific scenario in AP where he/she faced a problem and did something special in configuration/development in order to move from legacy to SAP system.
I would appreciate the help and award suitable points.
Thanks
Chandan

hi Chandan,
AP/AR are the combination of masters. For example in AP the vendor are the list of accounts to be maintained. The consistency of this master cannot be determined as the business grows the vendor may even grow on daily or monthly basis. Hence the master ledger of GL will be maintained in chart of accounts and the masters of AP/AR will be maintained as sub ledgers under the GL accounts
Accounts Payable is the management of vendors and the accounts receivable is the management of Customers.Both are sub sidiary ledger.And both vendor and customer are integrated with general ledger with reconcilition account.
So when any transaction happens in sub sidiary ledger GL is automatically updated since GL is integrated with Sub sidiary ledger through Reconcilition account.
The GL balance which is updated throuh Reconcilition account like Sundry crdeditors and the Sundry debtors are used while preparing the Financial statment like Balance sheet under the head Current Asset,loans and advances less Current liability.
Please see the below links and these are very usefull to u...
http://sapbrainsonline.com/TUTORIALS/FUNCTIONAL/FI_tutorial.html
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/41/37b8e7455b11d182b40000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
Assign the points if usefull to u ....
Ranjit

Similar Messages

Report Subscription fails, shows 'success', specific scenario

I have a report that will run successfully except for one very specific scenario. Any help or suggestions tracking down this issue would be helpful.
The report is named ProjectsWeeklyReport.rdl and takes a single parameter of a specific user's login account "DOMAIN\username"
The report runs successfully in the web regardless of the parameter (works for all users, including john.doe)
The report runs successfully in Report Builder regardless of the parameter (works for all users, including john.doe)
The report runs successfully as a subscription with the report included as a
MHTML file and a statically-selected parameter EXCEPT for john.doe. The same report works for all other users selected as the parameter
The report runs successfully as a subscription with the report included as a
Excel file (instead of an MHTML file) regardless of the statically-selected parameter (works for all users, including john.doe)
To summarize, in order for the report subscription email to fail, these conditions have to be met (otherwise the result is success):
- Report must have the parameter "DOMAIN\john.doe"
- Report must NOT be MHTML format in the email
I can see the subscribed report worked according to the ReportExecutionLog in MS SQL. Is there any reason why the MHTML version of the report subscription would fail to email? Any reason why it would fail as MHTML but be fine in other formats
(PDF & Excel both tested success)
For example, this one was never emailed:
InstanceName: APPSERVER\@Sharepoint
ItemPath: /{73419db6-f0e2-4096-a710-c630e8a26295}/Reports/ProjectsWeeklyReport.rdl
Username: DOMAIN\p_sps_app_pool_porta   (App pool account)
Execution ID: rkciwraxt5cmoi55niw3wx45
RequestType: Subscription
Format: MHTML
Parameters:   Engineer=DOMAIN%5Cjohn.doe
ItemAction: Render
TimeStart: 7/22/2014 4:27:05 PM
TimeEnd:   7/22/2014 4:27:12 PM
TimeDataRetrieval: 1200
TimeProcessing: 75
TimeRendering:   5667
Source: Live
Status: rsSuccess
ByteCount: 277050
RowCount: 431
NOTES:
There are no logs in Exchange message tracking of this email ever reaching our servers
The Manage Subscriptions page shows the report emailed successfully "Email sent to.." with the correct timestamp of 7/22 at 4:27 PM
And compare to this one that was successfully emailed:
InstanceName: APPSERVER\@Sharepoint
ItemPath: /{73419db6-f0e2-4096-a710-c630e8a26295}/Reports/ProjectsWeeklyReport.rdl
Username: DOMAIN\p_sps_app_pool_porta   (App pool account)
Execution ID: 1yycmuiwc4hzymzuyj1zbc45
RequestType: Subscription
Format: EXCELOPENXML
Parameters:   Engineer=DOMAIN%5Cjohn.doe
ItemAction: Render
TimeStart: 7/22/2014 4:21:10 PM
TimeEnd:   7/22/2014 4:21:18 PM
TimeDataRetrieval: 1574
TimeProcessing: 73
TimeRendering:   5912
Source: Live
Status: rsSuccess
ByteCount: 34180
RowCount: 431
Suggestions of where to look for errors? Troubleshooting ideas? Anything would be helpful! Thanks in advance.

Hi ElizabethCEE2010,
We can try to check the detail information about the error in the log file. The SQL Reporting Services log files are found on the reporting services point server, in the folder %programfiles%\Microsoft SQL Server\<SQL Server Instance>\Reporting Services\LogFiles.
Besides, to monitor and troubleshoot Subscriptions in Reporting Services, we can refer to the following two good blogs post by Dean Kalanquin:
Monitoring and Troubleshooting Subscriptions
Troubleshooting Subscriptions: Part II, Using the Reporting Services Trace Log File
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Specific scenario in PROFIT CENTER ACCOUNTING

Can someone tell me his/her experience about a specific scenario in Profit Center Accounting where he/she faced a problem and did something special in configuration/development in order to move from legacy to SAP system.
I would appreciate the help and award suitable points.
Thanks
Chandan

Hi
Below are some steps in the SAP transfer pricing:
Define transfer prices
Define transfer prices as surcharges on valuation prices
Plan transfer price effects on results by valuation of quantities
Valuate goods movements with transfer prices
Perform manual postings and corrections
Analyze results using reports
More on below link
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_45b/helpdata/EN/eb/13736a43c411d1896f0000e8322d00/frameset.html
SKS

Specific scenario in PROFITABILITY ANALYSIS

Can someone tell me his/her experience about a specific scenario in Profitability Analysis where he/she faced a problem and did something special in configuration/development in order to move from legacy to SAP system.
I would appreciate the help and award suitable points.
Thanks
Chandan

Hi,
Are you looking at KE30 - drilldown reports?
Rgds.

When do we use CE plan operators in HANA? any specific scenario?

when do we use CE plan operators in HANA? any specific scenario?

With current versions of SAP HANA you can avoid using CE-functions completely.
There's usually no need to choose them over plain SQL code,
- Lars

Specific scenario in AR

Can someone tell me his/her experience about a specific scenario in AR where he/she faced a problem and did something special in configuration/development in order to move from legacy to SAP system.
I would appreciate the help and award suitable points.
Thanks
Chandan

hi Chandan,
Pls go through the below link for all the queries....
http://sapbrainsonline.com/TUTORIALS/FUNCTIONAL/FI_tutorial.html
http://sapbrainsonline.com/TUTORIALS/FUNCTIONAL/FI_tutorial.html
pls assign the points, if usefull to u......
Ranjit

Specific scenario in GL

Can someone tell me his/her experience about a specific scenario in GL where he/she faced a problem and did something special in configuration/development in order to move from legacy to SAP system.
I would appreciate the help and award suitable points.
Thanks
Chandan

Hi,
When u r transfering the legacy data to sap in midst of the posting period with cutoff balances take care off tolerance group. Tolerance group are defined from the point of view of day today entries . This gives u problem when u are going to upload the data for a period which consist of total of that respective period per account. And this total u have to add with 1 or max 5 transaction runs where tolerance has to be considered.
Warm Regards

[svn:cairngorm3:] 16337: Fixing an NPE for a specific scenario:

Revision: 16337
Revision: 16337
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-27 00:41:31 -0700 (Thu, 27 May 2010)
Log Message:
Fixing an NPE for a specific scenario:
when using multiple listeners for one validator and when some of the listeners become null and a reset() on the validator group is called.
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Validation/src/com/adobe/cairngorm/validation/ValidatorMultipl eListeners.as

Wow that was a very quick response. Thanks camickr. I am only trying to delete a single row. I do not know how to go about posting a test program for the code I have posted above because honestly the gui itself is 800 lines of code, and then the file reading class is quite funky in itself. I can maybe email you the entire Netbeans project including code so if you are using Netbeans 5 RC2 you can run the code and see for yourself, but that would not be considerate of me.
See I am trying to delete any row at any time...but only one at a time not multiple rows...so if a user decides to delete row 23 and then tries to delete the last row which happens to be row 33 in my case, my setup should be smart enough to still allow to delete the row.

HR Authorization Specific Scenarios.

Hi all, i am faced with the following scenarios and trying to see if my solution is correct;
There is a group of HR Users in the company and each HR user in the HR department is not allowed to view each other's Personal Data. However the challenges come with this 2 exception;
1. 1 User is able to approve the leave of another, meaning there must be some maintenance access to allow Write to say IT2001 (Absences)
2. 1 or more HR users will run PAyroll for the HR department. Again, more infotypes need to be read in order to achieve this.
To separate the access within their own staff, i implement a value in IT0001-SACHP (value 001) so that they are restricted in their profile to their own HR Grouping. Their profile has all access except 001.
For the ability to approve Leave and also perform payroll, am i right to specify P_ABAP to say that i bypass IT check for the reports/programs related to the leave approval and Payroll run ?
Advice is greatly appreciated!

Hi,
I don't think P_ABAP bypasses Program authorization. It's for Reports.
To quote :
P_ABAP does not affect the authorization to start reports (this controls the program execution checks). Simplifies and accelerates additional individual checks in HR reports, or switches them off entirely.
If the user, as a general rule, is permitted to carry out uncritical reports (e.g. creating a list of telephone numbers), then do not assign an authorization for the object HR: Reporting (P_ABAP).
Using P_ABAP in HR Reporting:
You can use the relevant authorizations for this object to control how the objects P_ORGIN, P_ORGXX,
Customer-specific authorization object P_NNNNN are used in the specified reports to check the authorization of HR infotypes.
You can also use reports to control the infotype authorization check. This can be useful for functional reasons or to improve performance at runtime of the corresponding reports.
For this object, enter the report name(s) in the REPID field and the degree of simplification to be used for the authorization check in the COARS field.
The following degrees of simplification are possible:
COARS = <BLANK> or no authorization.
COARS = 1.The authorization checks for the infotype/subtype combination and for organizational assignment are to be checked separately.
This means that a user is authorized to read a personnel number when he or she has a read authorization for all the infotypes (subtypes) requested by the program and that the user has a read authorization for the organizational assignment of the personnel number.
COARS = 2. The authorization check is inactive.
Note that an ABAP authorization for report SAPDBPNP with COARS = 2 means that all HR reports based on the logical databases PNP or PAP (nearly all reports) cannot perform any more authorization checks. In general, you will only want to deactivate the authorization checks for a very small number of Reports. In case of doubt, do not assign your users authorizations for the P_ABAP object.
Futhermore, this authorization object differs from the object S_PROGRAM (ABAP: Program Run Checks).
The latter is used for _general program authorization checks.
In HR reports, these checks are carried out in addition to the HR infotype authorization check. HR Reporting, however, overrides the HR infotype authorization check for selected reports, with the result that the authorization checks are weakened or completely switched off.
SAP_EMPLOYEE_ERP is available only in mySAP ERP 2004 ;
Regards,
Remi

Specific scenario

Hi Gurus
can anybody please help me on how to handle this scenario? We created sales order on company A (the end cutomer name), but we will ship all the reuqired components to another company B and they will assemble everything and then send it to the end customer(company A). How we need to treat this scenario? What should the shipping folks reference against when they try to create a delivery? Please help
Thanks
Anusha

HI Anusha,
You requirment can be solved by mapping Sub-contract process...
You will delivery X material to Company B .Company B will add XYZ and this Product will send by Company B or You .
Delivery and Invoice to Company A.
You check with MM people .they interacting more than SD in this Requirment.
Revert if you have any Specific requirment.
Best regards
raj.

Federated Portal Network not working - specific scenario!

hi,
I tried to implement Federated Portal Network between three systems.
2 Producers
1 Consumer.
The systems i use are in the following fashion
Producer 1: Sneak Preview NW04s EP700 SP09
Consumer : Sneak Preview NW04s EP700 SP09
Producer 2: NW04s Full Version (EP 700 + BI 7.0) SP09
The scenario between Producer1 and Consumer works fine. I'm able to see the roles that are in the Producer1 from my consumer.
But the scenario between Producer2 and my COnsumer doesn't work. I'm not even able to see any roles that are there in my producer from my consumer.
Can someone tell me why this is happening? Is there anyother configuration that i need to do in extra to this if i'm using an ABAP+Java System?
I've followed http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/5b/9f2d4293825333e10000000a155106/content.htm
this link for my Configuration.
Kindly Help.
Regards
Ak.
PS: Posts will be appropriately rewarded

Hello,
We were able to resolve the issue by removing the proxy settings on both portals. We think it was something in the SPS17 support pack that made these settings obsolete.
On both portals, navigate to System Administration u2192 System Configuration u2192 Service Configuration.
Go to the Portal Catalog, navigate to the com.sap.portal.ivs.httpservice application.
Open the proxy service.
Remove the proxy server property values, as necessary and leave the defaults for Proxy Server.
NOTE: We are using a reverse proxy and we did have to define its settings in the proxy service. But after installing SPS17 we had to remove them and restart both portals. This resolved our FPN issues.
Thank you,
Jim V

Ibots specific scenario

hi all,
what is the use of Ibots. i knew that those are intelligent , wat is the use of it, why we need to send the reports to their personal mail ids, and to their mobiles ...
they can access their reports in the portal.. they can access their dashboard from internet and they can see their reports .. even through their mobiles also they can access the internet and they can see their reports ...
Why ibots. ?
can any one explain me with scenario that they have faced ?
Thanks
raja

799666 wrote:
hi all,
what is the use of Ibots. i knew that those are intelligent , wat is the use of it, why we need to send the reports to their personal mail ids, and to their mobiles ... Maybe they dont have access to the OBIEE portal? Maybe they are people outside of the organization that does not have an enterprise ID to login into the OBIEE portal? Reason to send it to their mobiles is what if someone dont have access to the internet? Most phones does not support advanced graphics and flash, in that case would you rather have a file sitting in your phone or try to run to a computer to see the report?
they can access their reports in the portal.. they can access their dashboard from internet and they can see their reports .. even through their mobiles also they can access the internet and they can see their reports ...Not necessarily everyone that has access to email's through their phone has access to internet. Some people prefer to have the reports send to their email because, they might not need access to any other report but just that one. Consider, invoice expense report. People usually need to see that report, does not need access to anything else in obiee, and you will need to fill out information in the report after printing it out. Would you rather have it just sent it to your email adress or login to portal, and find the print button and do all that work?
Hope this answers your question. Award points if helpful.
Thanks,
-Amith.

How can we use Adobe's Digital Publishing Suite given this scenario

I have a question regarding a very specific scenario as it applies to Adobe Digital Publishing that I am having trouble finding an answer to.
We are a small design firm that produces small-run, proprietary-information, official documents.
Each document is branded to one of our clients, but each document title's design is entirely unique even when done for the same client.
Our clients then selectively distribute these documents to a small number (max 200) of their propective clients (NO GENERAL DISTRIBUTION -- NO APP STORE or iTUNES -- NO CHARGE).
It would be nice that each of our clients could have a branded Adobe Viewer with which their selected prospective clients could view only those documents sent to them (PUSHED); NOT everyone with a client-branded Adobe Viewer would be PUSHED the same document.
And similar to the documents being PUSHED to only specific prospective clients of our clients, that our client could subsequently PULL / delete a document from the prospective client's viewer when the document has expired (besides being promotional documents, they are legal as well, and when expired, need to be withdrawn from readership).
So, how is something like this done? What Adobe DPS pricing plan applies?
Would it be a Single plan, but for each client branded viewer? The Professional and Enterprise pricing setup is excessive given our extremely small scale of extremely specific directed distribution for no revenue from that distribution.
Please help me understand, since I cannot find such an answer online.
Thank you.
Mark

If I understand you correctly, you would need an Enterprise level account for that.
Bob

Payroll scenario

Dear Experts below is the scenario followed by the sample data from the clients place for a specific scenario to be modified.Please suggest whats the best solution
Pay the commission entitlement in two portions, the first payment (pre-payment) at the tender acceptance stage, with the second payment being made at the contract signing stage. u2022 Conditions of employment would state that the commission is not earned until such time as the contract is signed. u2022 We occasionally have projects that do not proceed to contract signing, and hence would reverse the pre-payment payment. u2022 The majority of our salespeople are paid a regular fortnightly retainer as well as commission. u2022 The commission component could be a % of the u2018tender acceptanceu2019 value, or a fixed dollar value. We may have to allow for both types. u2022 Would like to be able to enter some data and report on as well. Data would be; SAP Project number (i.e. J/001354), SAP project customer number, tender acceptance contract value. u2022 We would also like to enter both payments at the time of initial processing, with the u2018balanceu2019 payment being put on hold or block, (hence reducing the need for further entry. u2022 Reporting would consist of determining commission amounts outstanding (i.e. the balances that are on block & the project numbers) per salesperson, and what has been paid in a period say. u2022 Terminated employees can still get paid their u2018balancesu2019 as contract exchange, and reversals (of the pre-payment) made if they donu2019t. Below is the sample data for the above-Could you guide me how to match the above requirement.
Typical Data
     Description     Value     Type/Location     Note/Comment
1     Project Number      J/001503     Level 1 WBS or Project Definition
2     Project Description     CAGALITAN - LOT 2403 GEORGES FAIR ESTATE     Level 1 WBS or Project Definition
3     Customer Number     1563     Customer Master Record
4     Customer Name     Conde & Evangelin Cagalitan     Customer Master Record
5     Tender Acceptance Value (inc GST)      $260,050      Commission Claim Sheet/Tender Acceptance     Job Variable
6     Tender Acceptance Date     26/09/2010     Commission Claim Sheet/Tender Acceptance     Job Variable
7     Salesperson Employee Number     10168     Payroll Data
8     Salesperson Name     Laurence Buckley     Payroll Data
9     Commission percentage     1%     Payroll Data     Variable per salesperson
10     Commission Total Value      $2,600.50      Payroll Data     Job Variable
11     Initial Commission Payment Split     _50%     _Payroll Data     Variable per salesperson
12     Final Commission Payment Split     50%     Payroll Data     Variable per salesperson
13     Initial Commission Payment Amount $1,300.25      Payroll Data     To be paid in first pay run after entry
14     Final Commission Payment Amount $1,300.25      Payroll Data     To be paid in first payrun after contract sign date
15     Contract signed date     22/12/2010     Contract Files/Payroll Data     Job Variable
Note:
     Items 9 through 15 would require new data fields in SAP (somewhere?)

If you create a Custom Infotype to store the Contract Information, use table T511K to store some constants (such as the 1% commission rate), and create a Custom Function to process your Custom Infotype, you will be required to create at least one or two PCRs to calculate the initial payment, and either the final payment or the recuperation of the initial payment.
I have never worked with the Australian Payroll Schema (if I remember correctly from your previous postings in the ERP HCM (HR) forum), but I would believe that you could place your Custom Function in the same sub-schema as functions P0014 and P0015.

How to implement FTP transmission scenario

Hi everybody!
Sorry, this is a rather long post, but I think the scenario is pretty complicated...
I have to implement an exchange of flat file data using the FTP protocol. I do not think this is possible using the standard FTP adapter, since there are some difficulties in the procedure:
First of all, the communication partner is a host-based system that only "simulates" an FTP server. The actual transmission steps are:
1) Connect to the host using username / password
2) Send a host-specific command using the 'site' command, i. e. something like (in MS-DOS like ftp syntax): 'quote site xyz=123'
3) Send a special ticket-file which contains additional instructions to the host-system
4) Send or receive an FTP file using the conventional 'PUT' or 'GET' commands.
As far as I can tell, this has to be done using ordinary ABAP programming - no problem there. But how can I bridge the gap between my ABAP program and XI messaging?
Should I create an ABAP job, read the data and somehow post it into the XI queue (how?) (inbound direction only)?. Should I start a workflow and pass the data to it (how?)?
Should I create a business workflow and start an ABAP program within this process (how?), starting this workflow via job scheduling?
I must admit I'm at a loss here. Any suggestions from you?
Best regards, Joerg

Hi everyone!
Thank you for your suggestions. I have considered this for a while and there still are some open questions...
First, I have to elaborate a bit on the specific scenario: There is an external host system, which is only accessible using FTP. The "standard" FTP adapter of XI is useless, since there are several non-standard steps involved which are not supported in the standard.
The XI system will be the only system "allowed" to communicate with the host - due to network and firewall restrictions.
The data from the host system will have to be processed by a backend SAP system. This R/3 system (release 6.20) will only have a connection to the XI system. There is a RFC FM for this purpose.
So if I follow your suggestions, I would have to do the following:
1) Import the RFC FM from the R/3 backend into XI
2) Generate a suitable interface spec. for this RFC along with mapping objects, etc.
3) Create an ABAP server proxy for this RFC
4) Create an ABAP client proxy for this server proxy
5) Create a report that will download the data from the host system and "post" ist to the XI message queue using the client proxy from step 4)
Sounds a bit strange - is this really a useful implementation?
Regards, Joerg

Specific scenario in AP

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for