Split criteria for document creating

Hello Gurus,
if I want to split a document (such as delivery document) into several target documents (such as billing documents), where can I set this split criteria ?
thanks very much!

Hi Bo,
Basically, all fields which are copied to the header of the delivery (table LIKP) via the routines of the copy control lead to a delivery split. Furthermore, some fields are copied to the header by all means and are relevant for the split there.
Split fields that cannot be changed are:
VSTEL     Shipping point
KUNNR     Goods recipient
ROUTE     Route
The following split-relevant fields can be affected via the copy control, however, they should not be filled differently from the defaults since they are necessary for the control of the shipping process:
VKORG     Sales organization
AUTLF     Full delivery indicator
VSBED     Shipping condition
FKARV     Billing type (customer billing document)
LIFSK     Delivery block
STAFO     Update group for statistics
STWAE     Statistics currency
KKBER     Credit control area
KNKLI     Account number of the customer with the credit limit default
GRUPP     Customer credit group
SBGRP     Processor group for credit management
CTLPC     Credit management: Risk category
CMWAE     Currency key of the credit control area
WAERK     Currency of the sales document
INCO1     Incoterms 1
INCO2     Incoterms 2
KZAZU     Indicator order combination
KDGRP     Customer group
PERFK     Invoicing dates (calendar identification)
In the table with delivery header data LIKP, there is the field ZUKRL. which can be filled with any values by using copying control. The contents of this field act as a splitting criterion during delivery creation.
If you have access to SAP Market place, then you can review the below SAP Notes:
546668     FAQ: Delivery split when creating deliveries
355404     Why was there a delivery split during creation?
Hope this helps you,
Regards
Nikhilesh

Similar Messages

How to create a block key default for documents created by MIRO?

Hi All,
How to create a block key (BSEG-ZLSPR) default for documents created by MIRO?
Could anyone tell me?
Thanks
Gandalf

HI,
The payment block--BSEG-ZLSPR can be made defaulted by two ways.
Means you want to fix one value all the times for the same ,you have to do the same in Vendor master
ie in the Vendor Master in the Payment Transactions Selection screen. make the Payment Block you want to be defaulted in MIRO.
you can do for all vendor master in mass change -- XK99.(LFB1)
if you are not OK with the Above .then there is another way to do the same
it is by Screen layout setting in SHD0
in this enter the Transaction MIRO and create a Transaction variant Z*** and click on create
and also create a Screen variant in OMLRLIST
T code MIRO
Screen variant name Z**
Program-SAPLFDCB
Screen Number 0020
and create it .
in creating ---enter the default value in the Payment block and in the varinat just check the box w.content
KNow in SHd0 add this screen variant for the above Trasaction variant
and then activate this trasaction variant by going into the tab Standard variants.
so that when ever you do miro this variant will be called and you can get this payment block defaulted.
hope so it helps
Regards
Anjanna

Creating a block key default for documents created by MIRO?

Hi All,
Could anyone tell me how to create a block key default for documents created by MIRO?
Thanks
Gandalf

Hi,
I cannot find substitution field BSEG-ZLSPR in GGB1.
My prerequisite is to check if SYST-TCODE = MIRO and unplanned delivery cost <> 0.
How to define unplanned delivery cost field in the prerequisite. I cannot find the field name.
You can see this field when you create MIRO, tab details.
The purpose for my substitution is to block all unplanned delivery cost invoices.
When I click on substitution the choices I got is only as below :
BSEG ABPER Settl.Period
BSEG AUGGJ Clrg Fiscal Yr
BSEG DOCLN Line Item
BSEG FIPOS Commitment Item
BSEG FISTL Funds Center
BSEG FKBER Functional Area
BSEG FKBER_LONG Functional Area
BSEG GEBER Fund
BSEG GMVKZ Execution
BSEG GRANT_NBR Grant
BSEG HKTID Account ID
BSEG HZUON Sp.G/L assgt
BSEG INTRENO RE code
BSEG KSTAR Cost Element
BSEG MEASURE Funded Program
BSEG PARGB Trdg Part.BA
BSEG PPA_EX_IND Excluding/Includin
BSEG PPRCT Partner PC
BSEG PRCTR Profit Center
BSEG PRODPER Prod.Month
BSEG PRZNR Business Proc.
BSEG PSEGMENT Partner Segment
BSEG SAMNR Collect.inv.
BSEG SCTAX FI-CA Tax Portion
BSEG SEGMENT Segment
BSEG SRTYPE Addit.Receivab.
BSEG UZAWE Pmt meth.supl.
BSEG XREF1 Reference Key 1
BSEG XREF2 Reference Key 2
BSEG XREF3 Reference Key 3
BSEG ZUONR Assignment
Can anyone help me ?

I'm experiencing major synchronisation issues on ICloud, especially for documents created on my Mac in pages, keynote and numbers. Contacts and agenda items work fine. I checked all my account settings.

I'm experiencing major synchronisation issues on ICloud, especially for documents created on my Mac in pages, keynote and numbers. Contacts and agenda items work fine. I checked all my account settings. But while I can upload documents from my MAC onto ICloud, they don't show on my IOS devices (whereas previously this worked without issues).

On this Mac I did move all the visible iCloud documents out of iCloud, into another folder, then disabled syncing, exactly as you suggested. But there were, apparently, documents remaining in my Mac's local iCloud store, "~/Library/Mobile Documents/" that I could not see (so could not remove). The Pages file "CSU-PD-UN1.pages" was one such document.
The act of disabling iCloud's document sync'ing, in System Prefs, just renames the local "iCloud" store to "~/Library/Mobile Documents/<appleid#>/" effectively shielding the it from the sync'ing mechanism. Looking at this renamed folder (the screenshot above) revealed that "CSU-PD-UN1.pages" (and other files) had not been removed; it would be reasonable to assume that one, or more, of these "undeletable" files were related to my original problem, and when I re-enabled doc sync'ing, those bad files would just clog up the works again.
So I deleted them with the Finder on both Macs (the other Mac had bad files too, but different ones), then re-enabling sync'ing on the two Macs and doc sync'ing between the Macs (and iCloud.com) appears to now work as intended.
Sadly, iOS devices (iPhone and two iPad) now do not sync at all. Newly created documents do not migrate to any other devices, and documents on other devices do to migrate to the iOS devices.
Your suggestions have certainly done some good, but something is now keeping my iOS devices out of the the iCloud doc sync'ing process. I suspect it's a similar problem as the Macs had ("invisible" files gumming up the works), so I'm going to apply some nasty tricks to explore the iOS devices file system and see if I can find them, and delete them by brue force.

Additional selection criteria for RHECM_CREATE_COMP_PROCESS (create compens

Dear All,
There is a requirement to add additional selection criteria for RHECM_CREATE_COMP_PROCESS.
Compensation Plan needs to take several optiions rather than a single option.
Incentive Plan Type to be added as additional selection criteria
Do we need to copy the standard program and then modify it or there can be some other way out for it.
Thanks and Regards
Shraddha

have checked out the SDN forums quite throughly and have come up with a couple of questions/solutions.
1) Copy the program into Z-name space and add in the code
Question: Where to specifically add the code, the program is huge with multiple enhancement points being seen in the code.
Can someone please guide me where I can change the displayed records, point where iI can append data or change the internal table being sent for ALV display.
---> U have to find out , where /how they defined Selection screeen , final output they are displaying.
2) Make changes in SPRO>Define field selection for material document list.
Question: The required field is not present within the listing, It does give the option to make new entries, but I have to specify a program/table and field.
If I create my own program to get the details and display onto an ALV Grid, will the program be called when I make selections on that requisitioner field?
---> lot of work to do
3) This is text copied from a thread, I have lost the link to it.
Create a Z report that is a copy of the selection include of the standard selection screen include with the additional selection criteria.
- Export the extra selection criteria value to shared memory.
- Submit the standard VL10G program with the selection sets.
- In user exit (depends on which field needs to be checked), import the extra selection criteria value back in and filter the selected data set.
Could someone please guide me if it is possible to do the above within RM07DOCS, and a little more detail on how to go about it?.
Better Options --->try to get the logic of MB51 , then do changes which are required.
most of data , u will get it from MSEGMKPFMARA+MBEW.
revert back in case of any other issues.
Regards
Prabhu

Number range for document created through transaction MR11

Hi All
I am using transaction MR11(Maintain GR/IR clearing account).I want to know where we configure the number range for the document which gets created on posting through transaction MR11.

HI,
SPRO --> MM -->LIV --> Clearing Account Mainteance --> Maintain Number assignment for Account Maintenance Document --> Maintain Number Range for Account Maintenance Document - Tcode - OMRJ or check in OMR4
Regards
KK
Edited by: Kishore Kumar Galla on Mar 24, 2010 3:30 PM

Preventing re-pricing in CRM for document created in MSA

Hi All,
I am trying to prevent a document (specifically a quotation) that was created in MSA being re-priced in CRM as we have differences in the pricing, specifically user exits for field catalogs which result in errors in the pricing if it is redone in CRM.
As I understand this, you should be able to control this by implementing the BADI CRM_30A_USER_EXITS Method USER_EXIT_UPLOAD_SALESDOC and set the Pricing parameter to 'A' in structure BAD_BUS_TRANSN_MESSAGE-ACTIVE_SWITCH.
However, even after implementing the code below, pricing is still re-determined in CRM, if I look at the mBDOC in TR SMW01 the entries that I wrote into the ACTIVE_SWITCH table in the BADI are not present.
Any help with this would be greatly appreciated, I've been tearing my hair out for a day and this is a major problem on our project.
Many thanks
Jason
Data declarations
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_sdgen_object> TYPE /1crmg0/sdgen_object01,
 <fs_active_switch> TYPE bad_active_switch_mess.
DATA: lt_fields_active TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF smog_sfldn,
 wa_fields_active TYPE smog_sfldn,
 lt_ddfields TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF dfies,
 wa_ddfields TYPE dfies,
 lv_sfavbak TYPE smo_sfavbk,
 lv_auart TYPE smo3auart,
 lv_sendbits TYPE smog_sinc-sendbits.
CONSTANTS: lc_active_struct TYPE smog_sname VALUE 'BAD_ACTIVE_SWITCH_MESS'.
Get the order details
LOOP AT salesdocgen_write-sdgen_object[] ASSIGNING <fs_sdgen_object>.
 lv_sfavbak = <fs_sdgen_object>-sfavbak.
 lv_auart = <fs_sdgen_object>-auart.
ENDLOOP.
Check the order is relavant for pricing - THIS SHOULD BE CHANGED TO A CONFIG TABLE
CHECK lv_auart = 'ZD01' OR lv_auart = 'ZD02'.
Get the active switch details
LOOP AT bus_trans_msg-active_switch[] ASSIGNING <fs_active_switch>.
Get the table structure
 CALL FUNCTION 'DDIF_NAMETAB_GET'
 EXPORTING
 tabname = lc_active_struct
 TABLES
 dfies_tab = lt_ddfields
 EXCEPTIONS
 not_found = 1
 OTHERS = 2.
 LOOP AT lt_ddfields INTO wa_ddfields.
 CLEAR wa_fields_active.
 wa_fields_active-fieldname = wa_ddfields-fieldname.
 wa_fields_active-position = wa_ddfields-position.
 INSERT wa_fields_active INTO TABLE lt_fields_active.
 ENDLOOP.
Fill Sendbits
 CALL FUNCTION 'SMO_SNDBITS_SETX'
 EXPORTING
 structurename = lc_active_struct
 TABLES
 sfields = lt_fields_active
 CHANGING
 sndbits = lv_sendbits
 EXCEPTIONS
 structure_not_found = 1
 wrong_fieldname = 2
 OTHERS = 3.
 CHECK sy-subrc = 0.
Switch off the pricing
 <fs_active_switch>-sendbits = lv_sendbits BIT-OR <fs_active_switch>-sendbits.
 <fs_active_switch>-ref_guid = lv_sfavbak.
 <fs_active_switch>-pricing = 'A'.
 <fs_active_switch>-task = '2'.
 MODIFY bus_trans_msg-active_switch FROM <fs_active_switch>.
 APPEND <fs_active_switch> TO bus_trans_msg-active_switch.
ENDLOOP.
ENDMETHOD.

Hi,
I am quite sure that there is no need to do this in some BADI but on customizing level itself (depending on process type or pricing determination), at least for 4.0.
Regards,
Wolfhard

No quicklook/preview for documents created with Pages 5.5!

Before opening files and find you can hit the spacebar and have a preview of most of the file types.
This always worked well with Pages until the newest version 5.5. Now I can only preview the files created with older versions of Pages.
Every file created with the new version only shows the icon or a very blurred image but not a readable preview of the file itself like before. Even worse, if you change a file with Pages 5.5 you also can't see a preview any more.
Apple's telephone hotline had no solution.
Any idea for a solution would be very helpful as my DevonThink database also uses the preview feature and opening any file before being able to have a quick look on it is really annoying.
Has anybody experienced this problem?

There's no preview on iPad or iPhone either for these files. You can't see the content in DevonThink to go.

Search for documents created "today"

There used to be a "today" button to use when I want to find a document to attach to an e mail, but the button is now gone. "Yesterday" is still there. How do I get "today" back?
nancy

What you're not seeing is that a smart folder or saved search is not actually a Finder object. a normal Finder window is a visual representation of an actual directory of files on the disk; a smart folder is a Spotlight search that is mocked up in a Finder window to look like a folder. Think of it like this - if you need to get everyone on some committee to sign a document, and you go to a committee meeting to get the document signed, you'll have no problems if it's a normal committee meeting but you'll be utterly stumped if the all the members are telecommuting via skype. the meetings may look the same from the outside, but you're really dealing with two entirely different kettles of fish.
Applescript has lots of tools for dealing with normal directory structures, but doesn't (as of yet) have much support for 'virtual' folders like smart folders.

Can WBS element be adopted as splitting characteristic for general GL

Hello :
In our PS module implementation, the client requires that WBS element be picked up in the line item of account payable (vendor) during logistic invoice verification. Currently, we managed to post below document:
   Dr:    GR/IR   - WBS1
            GR/IR -   WBS2
            VAT
      Cr: Account payable (vendor)
I am wondering whether WBS element can be selected as splitting characteristic for general GL? Therefore, WBS element can be posted for account payable.
As fas as I know, in IMG only three characteristics: Segment, profit center and business area are preferred as   splitting characteristic for general GL. WBS element is regarded as splitting characteristic for Controlling.
Does anybody has experience on using WBS element as splitting characteristic for general GL?
Cheers

Hello,
You can add PS_PSP_PNR to the ledger scenarios with the transaction FAGL_GINS which intends to be used for updating the open item and sum tables of the New GL. after that PS_PSP_PNR can be defined as splitting criteria for controlling, but can not be defined as splitting criteria for general ledger.
The reason for this is that it cannot be guaranteed that such fields as PS_PSP_PNR are supplied with values on the account receivables/payables by the standard FI and integration processes. The settings as
zero balance or mandatory field can lead to errors in the system. Therefore we do not recommend the usage of such fields as split criteria for the general ledger.
While PS_PSP_PNR can be defined as split criteria for controlling, so the relevant lines are splitted on the Profit & Loss accounts which are relevant for the CO account assignments.
With Best Regards,
Gladys

Document splitting: Items for clearing 0010/100062508/2010/001 not found

HI Gurus,
I hava issue with FC valuation. I have done configurtin for FC Valuation of GL A/c i.e, Long Term loan paybles which is created as Open Item management.
It is working fine post the entries at the end of May and reversed the same on 01.06.2010 in development system. i have moved saem request to Acceptance client and testing the same scenario. But i am getting the following error.
"Document splitting: Items for clearing 0010/100062508/2010/001 not found
Message no. GLT0002
Diagnosis
Document splitting cannot perform clearing because it was not possible to find complete splitting information on the items to be cleared (company code 0010, document number 100062508, fiscal year 2010, item 001).
System Response
Clearing cannot be performed and the document cannot be posted.
Procedure
Exclude the affected item from clearing.
It may be that this item was not posted with active document splitting. In this case, this item or document would have to be migrated."
I have checked the docuemnt splitting config . In two systems it was same and doc.splitting was configurated very long back.
Could any one help on the above error
Thanks in advance
PAVAN

Hi Pavan,
Please note the following, the error GLT0002 is normally caused by a change done in your customizing for splitting. Since you mentioned that this is happening for one company code, it seems to be that one change was made only for this company code in your SPRO settings.
For example if you have activated open item managment subsequently on account or another example would be that you posted document prior to activation of document splitting.
Please see section 5 of note 891144:
Items posted while open item management was still inactive in G/L account master data cannot be cleared after open item management has been activated subequently if New G/L document splitting is active.
Therefore, if document splitting is active, open item management should never be activated subsequently on accounts to which documents had already been posted with inactive open item management.
Review note 891144 in full. I believe that this will help you resolve the issue.
Best Regards,
Vanessa.

Document splitting: Items for clearing not found

Dear All,
I have created bank gl without tick of open item management now i have activate OIM & Transcation exisit for the same
I have done it as given below:
1) I have made GL balance Zero by posting an additional entry by F-02 (document type SA)
2) Block the GL for posting
3) though help of programe RFSEPA02 i have done the same.
Now the GL is OIM
Now i have to reverse the additonal entry pass to make GL balance zero
At the time of reverse through FB08 system gives an error massage
*" Document splitting: Items for clearing not found"*
Please any one help to resolve the issue
Thanks
Vijay

Dear Gladys xing
Thanks for your reply,
I have also done the same thing by passing one more entry to create the same balance.
When i am trying to clear open item for the both the extra entry system gives an same error
"Re: Document splitting: Items for clearing not found"
is this possible to clear that open item through F-03
Thanks
Vijay

Deletion of GL Accts in Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting screen

Hi Friends,
I am working with Document Splitting and I have assigned GL Accounts in Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting and also posted documents, now the functionality is working fine.
Now due to some reason I am trying to delete all these accounts from this screen, but I am getting below 3warning messages and I can able to delete these GL Accts.
Messages:
"Changes to Customizing settings can affect behavior of document splitting
Message no. GLT1414"
"Problems may first occur in the target system after the transport
Message no. GLT1411 "
"Role of Current Client: SAP reference
Message no. GLT1410"
I can able to delete these GL Accts, but before deleting I would like to know what is the impact in the system for already posted documents.
Can any one explain me, If I delete these assigned GL Accts from the system, Is there any system inconsistency will occur.
I would like to assign the same GL accounts again.
Best Regards,
Chandra

HI,
Document splitting is based on Item categories
and Item categories are assigned to GL account hence if you change
or delete any GL account or change the Item categories then document
splitting behavior will change.
If those Gl accounts and Item Categories is having open items then
inconsistency will create.
Hence before change of any setting you need think twice.
Reg
Madhu M

Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting

hi all experts,
could any one give me the path to Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
in sap 4.6 environment.
kindly answer this queston urgently
anil

Anil:
SAP Customizing IMG -
> Financial Accounting ( New ) -
>General Ledger Accounting (New)----> Business Transactions----> Document Splitting -
> Classify GL accounts for document splitting
Classify G/L Accounts for Document Splitting
Each business transaction that is entered is analyzed during the document splitting procedure. In this analysis, the system determines for each line item whether it is an item that remains unchanged or an item that should be split.
In order that document splitting recognizes how the individual document items are to be handled, you need to classify them. You do this by assigning them to an item category. The item category is determined by the account number. In this IMG activity, you need to assign the following accounts in the system:
Revenue account
Expense account
Bank account/cash account
Balance sheet account
The classification of all other accounts is known to the system, so you do not have to enter them here. You can enter an account interval since the system recognizes SAP-specific classifications and does not allow SAP settings to be overwritten by your own settings.
Assign points if info helps
Vj
How to give points: Mark your thread as a question while creating it. In the answers you get, you can assign the points by clicking on the stars to the left.

Assign a G/L Account to a Segment for Document Splitting

HI Experts,
Do you know if it is possible to assign a G/L Account to a specific segment?. I know and have setup the splitting method and rules, we have created item categories and base categories and splitting method. Document split is active and working fine. We have defined all different segments (MXC000, MXC0001, etc) in the Enterprise Structure section of IMG. On the other hand, I have an account for automatic postings 7300001 for the exchange rate differences when documents are posted in foreign currency.
Question is, is it possible to assign account 7300001 to a specific segment MXC0000 for example?. Since the postings to the 7300001 are automatic postings, is there a place in the system where I can assign my segment MXC0000 to account 7300001, thus automatic postings hit segment MXC0000 as well?
Reward points for helpful answers, Thank you.

Use Tcode FAGL3KEH and assign a default profit center such as XXXX .
In Profit center master data you assign "MXC0000" as segment.
System derives in this case the segment via Priofitcenter assigned in FAGL3KEH.
This is one way of doing.
Revisit the classification of GL accounts for document splitting and check whether the assignment to the GL account is "40200 - Exchange rate diff account "or not
reward points if useful
sarma

Split criteria for document creating

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for