SQ01 - Limiting Matchcode Box Results?

I have a query that uses logical database PNP. One field I'm using for selection is P0077-RACKY, ethnic origin. When a user using the F-4 matchcode box on this selection field, the results include ethnic origin codes for several country codes. Since we a USA organization only, is there a way to limit the results in the F-4 list to country grouping 10 ?
When the dialog box pops up, I can go to the restrictions and enter 10 which will give me the results I want. But, I don't see a reason for users to have to do this step. I'd like the results restricted to country group 10 up front.
The MOLGA is set in user parameters to 10, but that still doesn't help. We also have LND and PNI set to US.
Thanks,
John
John Rich
HR Team, The University of Tennessee

Field RACKY includes a foreign key check for MOLGA which is populated from table T001P . Unless you populate personnel area WERKS (which is associated with a country), you continue to see all values for RACKY. Before we invoke the screen which includes RACKY , we should have personnel area in memory for us to restrict RACKY list. That is why we have a restricted list for RACKY field in IT0077 (WERKS is populated before we create/change) and not in a screen without WERKS populated.
Hope this helps
Regards
Ravikumar

Similar Messages

Check box results are not included in PDF download.

I created a form that includes 300 plus checkboxes and imported the form into FC.
I can see the form results in the excel spreadsheet and the table of results. But when I click the download PDF, none of the check box answers are downloaded. The text box results are visible on the pdf, but not the check-box results...
I want to download a completed PDF that looks like the original document... Here's a link to the pdf form...
http://www.pkministrywebs.info/shape_assessment_toolsz1.pdf
Please help....
Dave

Thanks for letting me know that there is a 'bug' and not a problem on my end.
However, two weeks for resolution is a long time to wait when your working on a form project for a client. I just signed up for my first month on Forms Central and after a frustrating week of forum and one on one support, I learn that this online or "cloud" system couldn't process the PDF form.
My concern is this... I found a possible solution to my need to obtain results from a pdf form, but is it reliable? I am currently a week behind on a project and will be even further behind if I use FC to complete the project.
I'm questioning whether I need FC or not. Couldn't I email the fillable pdf form to the user and they complete it and email it back to me... I can save the completed form and export the data????
I'm questioning the reliability and value of FC. If I could speak with support via telephone, then I wouldn't be behind on this project.. If you were in my shoes, how would you feel right now?
Yes... I am a bit frustrated that my first FC form project doesn't work. I believe my concerns are reasonable. What can be done about the two week timeframe? This isn't what I was expecting.
I would like to speak with an Adobe support rep via telephone about this issue.
I welcome your response...
Dave

I would like to know how to force Firefox search box results to open in a new tab?

Results from any entry into the Firefox search box currently return in the tab that's open, regardless the location.
Is there a way to force "open in a new tab" without having to open a blank tab to keep the results from changing the current tab to the search resource location?

For the Google search bar on the Navigation toolbar you can set the pref browser.search.openintab to true on the about:config page.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/about%3Aconfig

Search results for Online Archive Limited to 250 results

We are running Office 365 Pro Plus with Exchange 2013 CU4 on premise (nothing in the cloud). When searching the Online Archive (with instant search or Advanced Find) within Outlook the results are limited to 250 items. This is frustrating to
people because we have email going back to 2006 so they are expecting many more results. I understand the need to balance performance, but why is there not a way to override this limit? I have searched but have been unable find a way - please
let me know if one exists.
Thank you, Jeff

Hi,
The behavior is currently by design with no immediately plans for this to change.
Thanks for your understanding.
Best regards,
Belinda Ma
TechNet Community Support

DW8 search box result page asp

Hi all,
I build with success a search box (text box) that search in
my db.
Now when I dont write a sting in the text box and push the
submit buttom,
the result page schow me all the results from my db. I set my
default value
parameters to %, this gives my all the results.
I'm wondering if there is a solution when my text box is
blank the result
page dont show all the records?
I can do thes by setting the default value to someting that
not match in my
db, like ----, but this is mayby not verry professional.
Is there a solution for this?
Thanks in advanced for your help!
www.SamDesign.be

Hi Dave, thanks for your help!
Yes, I had sorted out ;-)
For your information, you don't need two search fields. Make
for each
field in your db a variable and point for each variable to
the same
form field name, change the AND to OR. This works great!!
Happy New Year!!
Sam
"Baxter" <baxter(remove:-)@gtlakes.com> a écrit
dans le message de news:
enjt5o$otm$[email protected]..
> HI! Sam
> I thought you might have this sorted out by now? But
here is the way I
> would
> write your SQL statement
>
> SELECT *
> FROM qry_companys
> WHERE naam_bedrijf LIKE 'varnaam_bedrijf' AND
beschrijving_kort_fr LIKE
> 'varbeschrijving_kort_fr'
> ORDER BY naam_bedrijf ASC
>
> Variables
> Name Default Value Run-time Value
> varnaam_bedrijf % Request("Your Form Field Name")
> varbeschrijving_kort_fr % Request("Your Form Field
Name")
>
> Set up your form with two search fields one for
naam_bedrijf and one for
> beschrijving_kort_fr with a search button
> with the form action set to your results page.asp method
= get>
>
> Dave
>
> "Sam" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:enjr60$mk5$[email protected]..
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I build with success a search box (text box) that
search in my db.
>> Now when I dont write a sting in the text box and
push the submit buttom,
>> the result page schow me all the results from my db.
I set my default
> value
>> parameters to %, this gives my all the results.
>> I'm wondering if there is a solution when my text
box is blank the result
>> page dont show all the records?
>> I can do thes by setting the default value to
someting that not match in
> my
>> db, like ----, but this is mayby not verry
professional.
>> Is there a solution for this?
>> Thanks in advanced for your help!
>> www.SamDesign.be
>>
>>
>
>

SQ01 - Limited ABAP Knowledge - Help!

SAP Query Difficulties
Please see the above link for my requirements. I am carrying this report out in SQ01.
All the joins have been achieved with the standard infoset functionality.
Within a custom field 'SHORTS' I have the following code (I know it's not right but can't figure out how to write the correct code in to achieve desired results):
DATA:
begin of WA_FINAL,
VBELV like VBFA-VBELV,
POSNV like VBFA-POSNV,
VBELN like VBFA-VBELN,
POSNN like VBFA-POSNN,
KWMENG like VBAP-KWMENG,
LFIMG like LIPS-LFIMG,
end of WA_FINAL,
I_FINAL like standard table of WA_FINAL with header line,
l_sum like LIPS-LFIMG,
wa_del_sent like LIPS-LFIMG.
SELECT
VBELV POSNV VBELV POSNV
INTO
I_FINAL
FROM
VBFA.
ENDSELECT.
SELECT SINGLE
KWMENG
FROM
VBAP
INTO
I_FINAL
WHERE
VBELN = I_FINAL-VBELV AND POSNR = I_FINAL-POSNV.
SELECT SINGLE
LFIMG
FROM
LIPS
INTO
I_FINAL
WHERE
VBELN = I_FINAL-VBELN AND POSNR = I_FINAL-POSNN.
loop at I_FINAL into WA_FINAL.
    if sy-tabix = 1.
l_sum = WA_FINAL-LFIMG.
     WA_FINAL-LFIMG = WA_FINAL-LFIMG.
     SHORTS = WA_FINAL-KWMENG - WA_FINAL-LFIMG.
     wa_del_sent = WA_FINAL-LFIMG.
    else .
      l_sum = wa_del_sent + l_sum.
      SHORTS = WA_FINAL-KWMENG - l_sum.
    endif.
endloop.

How would I go about coding inner join on my internal table in this instance?
Sorry I am researching suggestions and trying to debug the code myself too but the collective expertise on this site may push me in the right direction with the right methodology.

Limiting Number of result in CMIS query

Hi
Can we limit number of results in CMIS query
my query is
SELECT * FROM ora:t:IDC:GlobalProfile WHERE ora:p:xRegionDefinition LIKE \'ALERTRD\'
I want only most recent 2 alerts to be displayed.
Thanks

Hi dears,
I have the same problem. I added a Content Presenter to my page in Jdev ide, not in runtime. And i need a query includes limiting the number of resluts.
The thread is signed with "correct" but i can't see any solution. Can you help me please? How can i limit the number of results ?
Regards,
Erdo

Limiting Check Boxes by User

How can I limit the number of check boxes a user can select? I created the form in Acrobat XI, there are 20 check boxes and are named "chkBox0 thru chkBox20."

Here's a sample form that demonstrates one way to do this: https://workspaces.acrobat.com/?d=j-aUbc3YTz1uu8Jx0LvzHg
Each check box calls the same function that's defined in a document-level JavaScript. You'll have to study it a bit to see how it works.
Here's the document-level function:
function limitCheckNumber(prefix, lower, upper, max) {
    // Initialize the selected check box count
    var count = 0;
    // Loop through the check boxes to see if the limit has been exceeded
    for (var i = lower; i < upper + 1; i += 1) {
        // Increment the counter if the current check box is selected
        if (getField(prefix + "." + i).value !== "Off") count += 1;
        // If the count exceeds the limit, deselect the check box that was just selected
        // and alert the user
        if (count > max) {
            event.target.value = "Off";
            app.alert("A maximum of " + max + " check boxes can be selected", 3);
            break;
And here is the Mouse Up script for each check box:
limitCheckNumber("check", 0, 9, 4);
The check boxes are named: check.0, check.1,...,check.9, and it's limited to 4 check boxes max selected at one time.

Zelda: Majora's Mask Limited Edition - box damaged in shipping

Just received my LE of Majora's Mask, and the box came totally crushed. Is there anyway to get a replacement at this point?

Hello DrAndonuts,
I'm truly sorry to hear about the condition of your packaging. Unfortunately, this is an extremely limited item and we won't be able to replace it. Hopefully, the items inside the box are intact. Again, I apologize for this and we really do value you as a customer.
Blake|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Limiting Text Box to Alpha Only A-Z using Acrobat 9 Standard

I'm trying to set a text box in my form to only accept alpha A-Z only. Can anyone tell me how to go about doing this. I'm working with Acrobat 9 Standard using a PDF file. Thanks!

OK, it's a little more complicated with Standard than it shold be, but begin by adding the following JavaScript to the first page's Page Open event (Pages panel > right-click on first page > Page Properties > Actions > Page Open > Run a JavaScript > Add) :
// Allow just upperse letter from A to Z
function alphaOnly_ks() {
    // Get all of the characters that have been entered in to the field
    var value = AFMergeChange(event);
    // Do nothing if field is blank
    if(!value) return;
    // Reject the entry if the entry doesn't match the regular expression
    if(!AFExactMatch(/^[A-Z]+$/, value)) event.rc = false;
Just copy and paste that entire block of code.
Now in the text field you need to call this function in the Keystroke event (right-click field with Select Object tool active > Properties > Format tab > Custom format category > Custom Keystroke Script > Edit) like this:
// Limit this field to uppercase letters from A-Z
alphaOnly_ks();
If you only have one page in the document, close the document and reopen it. If there are more than one page, go to a different page and return. This has the effect of loading the script so it is available from the field. If you were using Pro, you could place the function in a document-level JavaScript and avoid this nonsense.
The field should now only allow entry of uppercase letters from A-Z. It possible to alter the script so that any lowercase letters are automatically converted to uppercase.

Limiting the search results in MSA/BP-Search

Hello;
We are trying to limit the search results in MSA/BP-Search. We want to limit the number of BP's listed but do not know what code to write in MAS. May you please help us?
Best Regards,
Erkan Kaya
SAP CRM Consultant

Hi,
What is your ATG version?
Regards,
Jai

Service Manager 2012 R2 - MaximumInstanceCount limited to 6000 results

in previous articles and blogs it showed how to increase the number of query results beyond 2000 (default value)
that works fine, but in our case we need 7000 results, but if I increase the "MaximumInstanceCount" value above 6000, it has no effect anymore, somewhere else is a hard limit of 6000 by the looks of it
I also updated the Settings.XML in the ContentHost folder to 7000(DEFAULT_MAX_RESULTS), but no effect.

If you need more than 6000 you are doing something wrong. I suggest you read
Service Manager Request Query Result Filtering.
Cheers,
Anders Spælling
Senior Consultant
Blog:
Twitter: LinkedIn:
Please remember to 'Propose as answer' if you find a reply helpful

Highly frustrated with Outlook 2013 Search People box bugs - Multiple Name Results for Same Contact & Inconsistent Results

The Outlook 2013 "Search People" box does not function properly. It frequently displays incorrect results or a mess of duplicate results. I've reported previous issues about this and consolidating my posts into one (with screenshots this
time). Hopefully this message will be forwarded to or seen by the Outlook programmers. It really needs to be fixed.
Outlook 2010 and other prior versions worked perfectly. You search for name, you get ONE result with the info you're looking for. FAST AND EASY. But with Outlook 2013 Microsoft has created a heck of a mess resulting in huge frustration and productivity loss
with such simple but important tasks.
I have hundreds of contacts stored in my Outlook address book, and they all have COMPLETE contact info added.
One major issue that I'm experiencing in the new Outlook 2013 is that I now get average of 4 or more duplicate name results appearing for the same contact. And each result contains different and incomplete contact info, making it impossible for me to quickly
find the basic info I'm looking for. The cause of this issue is that Outlook 2013 now provides results from not only your local address book(s), but it also shows results based on your email history and social media accounts setup.
And there's no way to turn this off, or at least specify what folders and/or accounts the People Search box should use.
To make matters worse, the Microsoft developers conveniently forgot to add some form of an indicator (like a small icon besides each name result in the list) that clearly indicates what result is from what source. So you must manually click on each
result one at a time and repeat the search until you locate the correct one.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my local address book called
Infusionsoft. When I type "Infusionsoft" in the People Search box to quickly find a phone number, Outlook 2013 shows me 7 results with the same name. See the screenshot below:
As you can see in the screenshot above, every result just says "Infusionsoft", so I have to manually click on each name result one at a time and repeat the process until I find the correct one from my address book. This same thing happens with other
random contacts.
From what I can tell, Outlook is pulling results based on based on recent emails I've received from different people with "@infusionsoft.com" in their email address. So the first result shows "[email protected]" (just the email
address), the second result shows "[email protected]", the third result shows "[email protected]" and so forth. I don't want Outlook to show all of that. I just want what's in my address book!
And you would think that the last result would be the correct one from my address book, but no. Sometimes its the 5th result, and other times it's the 3rd or 7th result. So there's no freaking order of things here.
We simply need the ability to turn off searching of email history and other accounts when using the People Search box. Problem fixed.
(And please don't tell me that I need to "link" every incorrect result to one main contact. You shouldn't expect everyone to have to tediously link any and all results that appear to a record. ESPECIALLY when 5+ results for each contact appear regularly.)
ISSUE 2: Some names must be typed in a different way for the Search People to locate them
Another big issue I'm having with the Search People box is that some name searches don’t show the correct result, unless I search for their names in a different way.
For one specific example, I have a contact stored in my address book named "Dave Johnson". When I type "Dave Johnson" in the Search People box, one result appears, but it's just his email address, only. It's not the result that's stored in my Outlook address
book with his phone number, addresses, etc. Screen shot below:
If I type in Dave's name reverse order (Johnson Dave), no results are found at all.
Now if I just type in just"Johnson" all by itself, it finds Dave's correct result (the one stored in my Outlook Address Book). Along with everybody else that has "Johnson" in their name (see screenshot below)...
I double-checked how I have Dave's name programed in my address book, and it's in there as "Dave Johnson" for both the Full Name and File As fields.
Also, the name order shouldn't make any difference when using the People Search Box anyway. Sometimes I can find people by Last Name, First Name or First Name, Last Name. Only with random contacts does it get difficult finding their info and
I have to do strange things like this to find them from the People Search box.
ISSUE 3: Some Search People results only yield an email address only.
For other random contacts, some search results only yield an email address with no other contact details. But I can open the persons contact card from the address book manually, with the same email address shown! Screenshot below...
In the screenshot above, I have outlined the Search People box results in red, and the Address Book results in green. You can clearly see that "Robert White" is a contact stored in my local address book with full contact details, but the Search People result
only shows his email address! Again, it's not consitent. It's hit or miss with different people.
ISSUE 4: Some results just don't appear at all, but they are in the address book
Another issue I'm experiencing with the People Search Box is that some people simply cannot be found. But I can see their contact info just fine if I click on the "People" tab down at the bottom of the page and type in their name in the "Search Contacts"
field. Why can't the People Search box find certain people? I opened up their contact details and cannot find a single thing that would prevent them from showing up in results.
These are clearly serious bugs that need to be fixed. And I'm shocked as to how this got missed--or ignored during alpha and beta testing. I see the "idea" behind the developers having the Search People box search everything outside of the
address book, but in real world application this causes a heck of a lot of problems & confusion, and it needs to be fixed ASAP.
For technical details, I have Outlook 2013 running on two computers using hosted Exchange 2010. One system is Windows 7 and other is Windows 8. The same problems occur on BOTH computers. As far as my Outlook account setup, I have all contacts stored in the
main address book (no sub-folders or other folders).
Can someone help communicate this message to the Outlook developers??? The "Frown" button limits me to 100 characters and one image. There's no way I can communicate this level of detail and steps to duplicate in 100 characters!

Thanks for your reply.
1) The instant search boxes in each individual page work just fine. If I am on the People page and type in a name in the "Search Contacts" field, it searches my contacts and displays the results that I want. But I should not have to leave whatever screen
I'm in to find people now. In Outlook 2010 and earlier versions, I could be on the calendar page and then search for a contact without clicking off the calendar completely. For productivity-sake, it's a huge waste of time and hassle now.
2) I'm familiar with how contact linking works, and quite frankly it's a huge mess in general. I NEVER create multiple contacts for the same person. I get that Outlook 2013 get confused now when it detects a LinkedIn or Facebook account for the same person
already in my Outlook address book, but we need to have options that allow us to turn off results from some or all social networks. This is a big part of the problem.
Think about it this way - The average person has 150+ LinkedIn connections, and more for Facebook. Many people today have accounts for both and they are setup with the same email address. When Outlook 2013 has to scan all the networks IN ADDITION to your
local address book(s), it's a no brainer that it can get very confused trying to display results.
Another big part of the problem is that Outlooks new search system also scans your email history. I receive emails from people who use multiple email addresses, or emails from companies with multiple reps or ticket systems that send you a unique
ticket ID # ending in the same email address domain. Now Outlook displays people search results based on everything under the sun in my email history. This is beyond frustrating (see my "Infusionsoft" screenshot above in the first post).
Again, I want to stress that for the search examples I referenced, I only have one entry in my Outlook address book for each person. And that's all I want to find when I search for people--what's already in my own address book!
In summary:
We need an OPTION to turn off searching external networks when using the People Search box
We need an option to tell Outlook to not scan email history for people search results (I think this needs to be disabled entirely actually. It's not helpful at all)
There should be a fixed priority for displaying people search results, with local address book results FIRST, followed by social network results.
There should be a clear icon/indicator next to each result that gives you a clue as to where the result is coming from. Your address book? Facebook? LinkedIn? We should not need to click on each result to get a hint as to where it's coming from.
Work out the bugs in general with the new search system.
One other thing that I didn't mention is that the Search People box also shows results for people I'm not even "friends" or connected with on the different social networks. But I've noticed that some people use the same email address for those networks that
I already have programmed for them in my address book, which is why Outlook sometimes shows me these results. Does that make sense?
I'll try rebuilding the index, but after testing Outlook 2013 on 3 different machines so far and seeing the same results (all slightly different results on each machine and very inconsistent), I doubt this will address the issue.

Display of files in the (search) "results" box

I'm using Adobe Reader XI, version 11.0.09 (pre-installed in my computer, which is using Windows 8.1)
When I use the advanced search to look for recurrence of a word within several .pdf files in the same folder, at the end of the search, the box "Results" is reduced to a very small line, the height is less than one printed line, and it is impossible to see the list of found files.

Thanks for responding Alexandre.
Yes its Opportunity Application CRMD_BUS2000111.
In the application layout of the above application.
OPP_DISPLAY_SEARCH_RESULT field group was assigned to
Event INIT , FOCUS_CHANGE_SRES and SAVE with element SRES and Position 2.
OPP_DISPLAY_SEARCH_RESULT_CREATE field group was assigned to
Event CREATE_FOLLOWUP and CREATE with element SRES and Position 2.
In the activity Application element--> field group
the above two field groups have 20 in the last 2 columns.
Still in the PCUI Im getting only 5 lines.
Am I missing any thing ?
Regards,
Swiv.

Search Results Details

I've been considering migrating from Windows to Mac for the past year and have had the chance to test drive my girlfriend's machine, and my mom's also.
So far I find limitations that really seem discouraging and I'm wondering if the latest OS has fixed the limitation of search results in Finder: Can you display the file size, path, and other attributes in the search results?
Frankly I was stunned to find that I could search for say, files over 32MB but then not see their location in the Finder search results list.
Windows has had this ability as far back as I can remember, v3.1?

file path was always available in search results. it's displayed at the bottom. the number of other attributes you can list in search results was increased in snow leopard although it's not huge. switch to column or coverflow flow in a finder search window. then go to view->menu->show view options and check the boxes for columns you want to see. for some reason the size column is listed but is grayed out. that looks to be a bug. the following workaround lets you add the size column to the search results
http://www.macosxhints.com/article.php?story=2009083113534843

SQ01 - Limiting Matchcode Box Results?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for