Ssh to the same machine

Hi,
After patched the latest SPARC Solaris 10 Recommended, I notice the SSH version is now Sun_SSH_1.2. Now I can not ssh as root user to the same machine.
Before updating this, it was working fine.
5.10 Generic_141414-10 sun4v sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-T200
bash-3.00# ls -l /.ssh
total 8
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 224 Sep 22 11:59 authorized_keys
-rw------- 1 root root 883 Sep 22 11:59 id_rsa
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 224 Sep 22 11:59 id_rsa.pub
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 459 Sep 22 11:59 known_hosts
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks much,
R-

I am also seeing this from a remote sever.
# ssh -vvv mytesthost
debug1: Trying private key: /.ssh/id_dsa
debug3: no such identity: /.ssh/id_dsa
debug2: we did not send a packet, disable method
debug3: authmethod_lookup keyboard-interactive
debug3: remaining preferred: password
debug3: authmethod_is_enabled keyboard-interactive
debug1: Next authentication method: keyboard-interactive
debug2: userauth_kbdint
debug2: we sent a keyboard-interactive packet, wait for reply
debug2: input_userauth_info_req
debug2: input_userauth_info_req: num_prompts 1
Password:

Similar Messages

Need help:server client in the same machine

hello all,
i want to install oracle client and server on the same machine(cause i only have got one)
to do that,
for server installation i did the following:
# mkdir /u01
; /u01
# cd /u01
# mkdir -p app/oracle/oradata
# groupadd dba
# groupadd oinstall
# groupadd oracle
# useradd -g dba -G oinstall,oracle -m oracle -d /u01/app/oracle
; risumi des caractiristiques du compte Linux oracle
; user : oracle
; groupe principal: dba
; groupe secondaire: oinstall, oracle
; ripertoire par difaut: /u01/app/oracle
# cd /u01
# chown -R oracle.dba /u01
; virification des droits
# ls -l /u01/app/oracle
# ls -l /u01/oradata
# passwd oracle
# more /etc/passwd
# more /etc/group
; sortie de votre session root
# exit
$ su - oracle
in .bash_profile(file) i wrote the follwing parameters :
export DISPLAY=localhost:0.0
export ORACLE_BASE=/u01/app/oracle
export ORACLE_HOME=$ORACLE_BASE/product/8.1.6
export PATH=$PATH:$ORACLE_HOME/bin
export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$ORACLE_HOME/lib:/lib:/usr/lib
export ORACLE_SID=TEST
export ORACLE_TERM=vt100
export NLS_LANG=french_france.WE8DEC
export ORA_NLS33=$ORACLE_HOME/ocommon/nls/admin/data
the oracle server works fine!
So, the server installation directory is /u01/app/oracle/product/8.1.6
what i have to do for client installation in the same machine:
do i have to create a new groups(dba,oinstall...)?
do i have a new directory to install oracle client?
can somebody give me any information?
Thank's a lot in advance
null

You can install your client parts in the same ORACLE_HOME as the server as long as they are of the same version. In fact, a lot of the client has already been installed, since it is part of the server installation.
If your client is of a different version than your server you will have to install it in a different ORACLE_HOME. You can do this using the same oracle user.

Runing BO 6.5 and Xi 3.0 on the same machine

I have installed 6.5 and Xi 3.0 on the same workstation. Both versions run fine when I run them one at a time (open one, work on it, then exit before starting the other).
However, when I run 6.5 and Xi 3.0 simultaneously, then the next time I try to run either of them, I receive a message asking me to install again.
Has anyone run into this?
Michael O

Hello Constantino,
Is there no way this will work? As I have several customers thinking about or planning an upgrade/migration to XI 3.0, running legacy and new software side-by-side on the same machine is a very important issue, especially as migrations are usually an incremental process, requiring both versions to co-exist for some time.
I have never had any problems running 5.x / 6.x and XI r2 on the same machine, even simultaneous, that's why I'm so surprised at the sudden change.
Any input would be welcome! Thank you!
Kind regards,
Kristof Speeckaert

Designer 6i and 10g on the same machine?

I have Designer 6i and corresponding repository on my machine.
The problem with 6i I can't save diagramm in HTML format
I believe I can save in HTML format in 10g or other?
Can I install on the same machine 10g designer?
should I configure new repository?
TIA

See my update on your earlier question.
As for running 6i and 10g on the same machine, yes you can do it. You just have to install them in separate Oracle Homes, and be careful when you tell them which version of EXP and IMP to use. There is one MAJOR caveat, however. They cannot use the same Designer Repository - 6i client won't talk to a 10g repository and 10g client won't talk to a 6i repository. You can upgrade a 6i repository to 10g with the RAU, but take a backup before you do - the only way to go back is to restore your backup. Besides, I think that if you upgrade to the last supported version of Designer 6i (you should be able to get it from MetaLink) you will get the Publish Diagrams utility.
Frankly, my opinion is that there is only one reason to stay on 6i - if you need to generate and support 6i client/server Oracle Forms. If you don't use Oracle Forms, or if you have moved on to Web Forms with the middle tier Forms Server, I'd recommend an upgrade to Designer 10g and Developer 10g.

Can there be more than one JVM Running on the same machine

Can there be more than one JVM Running on the same machine.

Even JVM's of different versions (or vendors) can run on the same box at the same time.

How do i enable office applications for all user accounts on the same machine?

Hi All,
I just purchased a new MBA and Office Hame & Business. Coming from the windows world I thought that one installation of office should be available to all accounts that I set up on the same machine. I set-up the user accounts then installed office 2011 for MAC and tried to access office from my daughters account -> can not locate office? Does MS expect that you need to purchase a separate copy of office for each user on the same machine?? I also don't want to waste precious harddrive space in the MBA to have separate copies of the same application installed.
Any help would be appreciated....
Andrew

One install allows all your users to use Office. All your users have access to the Applications folder where the office apps are installed. Do you see the office folder from your daughters account in applications?

Sharing one Aperture Library between multiple users on the same machine

Is there a way of setting up Aperture so that two different users on the same machine have full rights to do everything?

Ian,
Thanks for the suggestion. It certanly better than nothing, but in my case there is no partition with permissions off and there are other users to whom I wouldn't want to give full rights to the library. As an alternative I thought of simply creating a special user and do all editing from it.
At any rate, it would have been useful if Aperture had something like that built in - like a preferences option, where one could specify a MacOS group name, and Aperture would do all its file/folder create operations within a given library with setgid()/setegid() of that group and corresponding umask() to give rw permissions to that group. Not too hard to do, either.

Sharing iMove Projects Libraries with different users on the same machine

I was wonder how two different users on the same machine can
share project libraries. Some Context:
My daughter has some finished projects in her project library and
I either want to import those project into my library or share them
so both user accounts can access the projects (similar to how the
event library is accessible)
Note: I've already moving the project library to a shared disk (the one
the event library is on) with no luck
Using iMove 09
tia...

You need to move each project to the external drive from within iMovie. Be sure to use command-drag so you move, not copy.

Can I install two independent instances of Thunderbird on the same machine?

It is required to install two instances of Thunderbird on the same machine, each with its own account(s), Profiles folder(s) and sign-on password, so that each of two users can securely use Thunderbird at different times..
How can this be achieved?
Thanks,
NMB1

The simplest method is to install Thunderdird normally from an admin account. The two or more users then use ordinary none admin accounts. Thunderbird will be available to each user and each OS account has a separate Thunderbird profile, so each user has effectively totally separate Thunderird accounts and passwords.
* See http://windows.microsoft.com/en-gb/windows/create-user-account#create-user-account=windows-7

Multiple users on the same machine using a common iTunes Library

I'm running iTunes from my user profile in Vista, the songs are stores in a shared directory.
My wife recently purchased an iPhone, so I decided to setup her phone under her user profile in Vista, so she could use her contacts out of outlook, this meant I had to setup iTunes for her. All the outlook contacts sync with her phone (no issues), but when I point the music library to the directory where I stored the music I can't see the library.
I have searched under my user name and found the iTunes library.itl, this file in my user directory, not accessible when I wife is logged into her account.
Is there any way to have different user profiles on the same machine access the same music library in iTunes. So when I purchase music under my account and download it to the library, my wife's iTunes will also see the music, I'm okay if I have to do a manual sync, under her iTunes..

Move the \Music\iTunes\ folder to a Shared directory.
Hold Shift and launch iTunes.
Select *Choose library* and select the _iTunes library.itl_ file in the \iTunes\ folder in the Shared directory.
Quit iTunes then let yoru wife log in and hold Shift and launch iTunes.
Select *Choose library* and select the _iTunes library.itl_ file in the \iTunes\ folder in the Shared directory.

Can you share to other users on the same machine?

If I have 2 users on the same machine, and I log in with one user, open iTunes, then swich user and bring up iTunes. Will the second user see the shared shongs from the first user?
Thanks,
Alfredo

Here is what I did:
1. Create new user account.
2. Open iTunes
3. Set preferences to NOT copy files over on an import.
4. Set the location for my music library to the "Public" folder (created an iTunes folder in there and pointed to it).
5. Selected "Add to Library" and selected the top level folder where my songs are (an mp3 folder on my firewire drive)
6. Since my son had some songs of his own that he exported from Garageband, I went back the the preferences and checked the "copy files on import", then selected "Add to Library" on those files. NOTE: if you do this, you may want to exclude that directory in step 5 above.
The reason I used Public/iTunes as the output folder, was so other account could import those files to their iTunes in the future.
Alfredo

Can i share music and photos between two users on the same machine?

How can I share my music and photos between two users on the same machine?

Thank you Joe - I tried this but it's only showing a teensy amount of music - the stuff on the second users account as opposed to the giagntic library on the 'main' account. I actually went to a Genius Bar and they said that apple doesn't really want you to share music between accounts - parents don't want to hear their kids music etc. Which seemed strange, but it might be the case sadly Thanks anyway!

Multiple Portal instances on the same machine

Hi Forum,
we have a requirement where in we are asked to implement multiple instances of Portal on the same machine. can you please give me some detials on Feasibility , issues and limitations of having multiple Portal instances on the same machine , different instances pointing to different tiers(Dev, Test, Production) etc
pointers will be highly appreciated..
regards,
uday

Hi Uday,
Please look at this.
Multiple Portal Instances - Virtual Hosting
Regards,
Siva
P.S: Award points if you find this useful.

File sharing across multiple user accounts on the same machine

Hello,
I try to figure out how multiple users (my wife and I) on the same mac can have equal access to files on the local drive without granting that access to all users on that machine or even the rest of the world.
My research sofar hasn't come up with a satisfying solution. Here are the solutions that I am looking at:
1. Enable a permission system that ensures access to both users in all cases (file/directory creation, copy and move).
I only found a suitable solution for creating and copying files/directories but not for moving them.
See the following articles for reference:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/20787617#20787617 Setting up a shared structure that works e.g. for iPhoto Library but not for moving files to and from
https://discussions.apple.com/message/4005647#4005647 Helpful information on POSIX Permissions, ACL's an Permission inheritance
This would be my first choice if I can get around the problem of moving files...
2. Disk Image
Create a disk image which ignores persmissions and set permissions for the file that contains the image instead.
Read this article to get further details: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1198
This solution will work but has a few disadvatages:
There's no mutual access from multiple user accounts since an image may only be mounted by one user at a time.
One has to create a startup script that mounts the image upon login which would create a first come first serve for access to the image content.
3. Using a file sharing protocol (e.g. afp or smb) locally.
The idea behind it is to have a server providing the files mutually to multiple users one the same machine. At them moment this seems to be the most promising approach to me.
Unfortunately I can get acces from another machine but not from the same machine. Has anyone ever tried to access the file sharing (afp or smb) from the same machine on which the server is located?
Has anyone got some helpful hints for me?
Thanks in advance.

Sorry, but you didn't specify details, and it was worth checking whether or not you had overlooked this approach.
The problem you're having (as I suppose you already know) is that any new disk item inherits the permissions of the folder it is originally created in in. These permissions (sensibly enough) need owner or administrator permission to change once they've been established; that will happen when you copy a file to a new location (because that's essentially creating a new file) but not when you move it. any of the following would work:
changing the permissions on newly created files for both users so that they all explicitly give r/w access to a particular group.
writing a droplet that would change the permissions of files dropped on it and move them programmatically to the shared folder
set up a folder action or launchd job that would watch the shared folder and automatically convert permissions on files placed in it.
The last would be the approach I would take, but... which appeals to you?

How do I share files between users on the same machine?

I tried using /Users/shared to share files between myself (Admin user) and another user on the machine (Standard user). Whenever I put a file or a folder into said directory permissions are 755 for directories and 644 for files, my umask is 0022. The files and directories belong to my user and the group staff. This means I can read and write and others can read. If I do the same using the other users account. Permissions are 700 and 600 respectively. (Owner is the other user and group is staff.) Strangely the other users umask is 0022, too.
The result is, that all directories and files I create with my account (Admin user) are readable to every other user on the machine, whereas all directories and files the other user (Standard user) creates are not readable for anyone else. I can easily rectify this using the Terminal and chmod and/or chown, but it is a pain having to do this, since I also need to forcefully restart the Finder App for it to notice the changed permissions.
Ideally I'd like all directories in /Users/Shared to have permissions 777 and all files 666 no matter which user created, copied or moved them to said location. I think this could possibly be done using applescript and shellscripting and the folder action hook. So far my attempts to find such a script on the net or/and write it myself have failed. I'd be grateful for any hints how I:
a) write and setup such a script
b) accomplish what I try to do (share files and folders on the same machine) in another possibly more Mac way
Kind regards
David

The following AppleScript will recursively descend the directory tree and change the items to your modes:
<pre style="
font-family: Monaco, 'Courier New', Courier, monospace;
font-size: 10px;
margin: 0px;
padding: 5px;
border: 1px solid #000000;
width: 720px; height: 340px;
color: #000000;
background-color: #FFDDFF;
overflow: auto;"
title="this text can be pasted into the Script Editor">
on adding folder items to this_folder after receiving these_items
repeat with some_item in these_items
ProcessStuff from some_item
end repeat
end adding folder items to
to ProcessStuff from SomeItem
processes items contained in SomeItem, recursively descending the directory tree
parameters - SomeItem [mixed]: an item containing the items to process
returns nothing
set SomeItem to SomeItem as text
set FileInfo to (info for SomeItem as alias)
if (folder of FileInfo) and not (package folder of FileInfo) then -- a folder (not a package)
do shell script "chmod 666 " & quoted form of POSIX path of SomeItem
-- do shell script "chown root:staff " & quoted form of POSIX path of SomeItem user name "me" password "mypassword" with administrator privileges
try -- to get items in the folder
tell application "Finder" to set SubFolder to (items of folder SomeItem)
on error
return {}
end try
repeat with SubItem in SubFolder -- process the sub items
ProcessStuff from SubItem
end repeat
else -- a file
do shell script "chmod 777 " & quoted form of POSIX path of SomeItem
-- do shell script "chown root:staff " & quoted form of POSIX path of SomeItem user name "me" password "mypassword" with administrator privileges
end if
return
end ProcessStuff
</pre>
You shouldn't need to change the ownership, so I commented out the chown shell script since this would need to be run as a super user. You can run a shell script with administrator privileges, but in order to be used by a standard user you will need to provide the appropriate user name and password in the script, which might not be a good idea - note that the folder action script will need to be attached in all accounts that you want to change the permissions, which means that it would need to be accessible to those accounts.

Ssh to the same machine

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for