ST04 - Performance Overview
The dat displayed in the screen is not correctly positioned . The values for various headers are displayed at the end/bottom of the screen and not aligned properly with the headers . ERP 6.0 EHP 4 , Netweaver 7.01 is the version
Hi,
Is that happening with all the SAP screen (ex ST02,DB02,ST03 etc.,) or only for ST04 also try to check the option (graphic settings).
Thanks,
Salim
Similar Messages
-
Portal Runtime Error in Performance Overview
Hi Experts ,
I am getting portal runtime error while accessing performance overview and this error is occurring in test system not in prod. I have only passed our custom parameter in "ViewGroup" and "ViewID" , which comes under property Editor of Performance Overview Iview.
Please find the server log :-
#0002A58CD85E00460000018900000C240004A6BED67C6350#1309238479307#com.sap.portal.prt.request#sap.com/irj#com.sap.portal.prt.request#sudad59#121793##n/a##6903e340a14611e09ecb0002a58cd85e#Thread[PRT-Async 2,5,PRT-Async]##0#0#Error#1#/System/Server#Java###Exception in PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest without timeout
[EXCEPTION]
#1#java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: com.sap.pct.hcm.objectanddataprovider.CFTableViewModel.getClickableObjects()Lcom/sap/pct/hcm/objectanddataprovider/proxyclasses/Hrwpc_S_KeyobjecTypeList;
at com.sap.pct.hcm.teamviewer.TeamViewerPage.getJSArrayOfObjects(TeamViewerPage.java:1005)
at com.sap.pct.hcm.teamviewer.TeamViewerPage.getJSCodeOnLoad(TeamViewerPage.java:1031)
at com.sap.pct.hcm.teamviewer.TeamViewerPage.getJavaScriptCode(TeamViewerPage.java:839)
at com.sap.pct.hcm.teamviewer.TeamViewerPage.doProcessBeforeOutput(TeamViewerPage.java:512)
at com.sapportals.htmlb.page.PageProcessor.handleRequest(PageProcessor.java:123)
at com.sapportals.portal.htmlb.page.PageProcessorComponent.doContent(PageProcessorComponent.java:134)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.AbstractPortalComponent.serviceDeprecated(AbstractPortalComponent.java:209)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.AbstractPortalComponent.service(AbstractPortalComponent.java:114)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.component.CachablePortalComponent.service(CachablePortalComponent.java:273)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.callPortalComponent(PortalRequestManager.java:328)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.PortalRequestManager.dispatchRequest(PortalRequestManager.java:136)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.async.AsyncIncludeRunnable$1$DoDispatchRequest.run(AsyncIncludeRunnable.java:375)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.async.AsyncIncludeRunnable.run(AsyncIncludeRunnable.java:388)
at com.sapportals.portal.prt.core.async.ThreadContextRunnable.run(ThreadContextRunnable.java:164)
at EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.PooledExecutor$Worker.run(PooledExecutor.java:729)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:
Let me know if you need any further information.
Any help will be really appreciated with points.
-Regards
AK
Edited by: Khamari_alok on Jun 30, 2011 10:32 AM
Edited by: Khamari_alok on Jun 30, 2011 12:42 PMthere is an issue with the object and data provider evaluation path ie OADP
Please check using standard
Other mySAP.com components>Business Packages / Functional
Packages>Manager Self-Service>Object and Data Provider>Restrict Nuber
of Navigation Objects.
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPHCM
/DifferentfeaturesofOADPbasedonECC+6.0
You can debug in backend using FM HRWPC_GET_OBJECTS_FROM_ROOTS -
RZ20 - Performance Overview memory monitors
I have a question about the values displayed in one of the CCMS monitors.
In RZ20, following this path:
SAP CCMS Monitor Templates
Performance overview
<SID>\<SERVER_INSTANCE>
Memory Management
I do the following:
Click on HeapAct monitor
Click the menu: Views -> Details for Performance Nodes
This appears to give me information that I am after - hourly values. However, I am not sure what the numbers under the hourly values actually represent. I can click on the Number of Measurements Of/From button and the hourly values change - but again, I'm not sure what these numbers are.
Does anyone know what these numbers are telling me?
thanks,
Jeff HenkeRunning a copy operation of a large file can indeed take quite some memory, and it can result in that SQL Server will be requested to yield memory. Or even worse, be swapped out the page file, if SQL Server does not react fast enough. Has the service account
for SQL Server been granted the Windows permission Lock Pages in Memory?
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected] -
ST04 performance question...
Hi,all
My SAP system's ST04 database performance analysis -->Data buffer Quality is 67.5% less than 95%
Busy wait time and CPU time's ratio are 32:68 ,not 60:40
So,how can I adjustment this, thank you!
Edited by: Terry Chiang on Sep 29, 2011 8:33 AMHi Terry,
ST04 is a good transaction that SAP has provided for analyzing database performance.
The ratio of Busy wait time to CPU time should ideally be close to 60:40 as you mentioned. If you see very high values (such as 80:20) or in case if less, system performance can be improved using 'wait event tuning'. If the CPU time is significantly higher than 40%, check the CPU utilization on the database server.
Some other factors that you can check for improving the performance are:
Time/User call should be less than 20ms. Note that the value can be much higher due to the inclusion of special idle events which limits the relevance of this data.
Hit ratio (Quality) of the data buffer should be more than 94%. A low hit ratio might be due to small size of the data buffer.Chek SAP note 619188 for a deeper analysis.
Reads/User Calls should be less than 15. If it is too high, check for expensive SQL statements. SAP Note 766349 will be useful to you.
Go to Detail Analysis Menu -> File System Requests and check the average read time (Avg(ms) for Blk Reads) for individual data files or in total (Total under the column). If the values is very high in comparison to 10 ms, check whether the problem can be solved by improving the data distribution or if there is any Disk I/O problem at hardware level.
You can analyse more on disk usage from ST06/OS07 (-> Detail Analysis Menu -> Disk). If the load on the database server's disks is more than 80%, you need to redistribute the data files.
DD-cache quality should be more than 80%; pinratio should be more than 95%; reloads/pin should be lower than 0.04; User/recursive calls should be more than 2. If there is too much deviation in these indicators, you need to increase shared pool size.
Hope the info helps you.
Thanks -
Different transaction codes useful for Performance Monitoring
Hi Experts,
Please can you guide me on this question, as to what are the different transaction codes useful for Performance Monitoring i.e. workload statistics and database statistics? What kind of statistics do each of these codes provide?
Many thanks,
MithunHi Mithun
In performance issuses you need to look in terms of many ways that is..
Workload analsys
ST03N: Statistics Regards Locallly
ST03G: Statistics Regards Golbally
STAD: Individual Statistics Regards
STATTRAACE: Individual Statistics Regards Trace
ST07 : User Distribution
Buffers and Memory
ST02 : Buffers and Memory and swaps monitoring
ST10: Table Acess
OS Monitoring
OS04: Locally monitoring
OS07: Remotely monitoring
OS01: LAN check
DataBase Side
ST04: Performance overview
DB01: Exclusive locks
DB02: Tables/Indexes
BackgroundJobs monitor
SM37
other tcodes
ST22: Abap Dumps
SM12: Lock Entries
SM56: NumberRange Buffers
SU56: User Buffer
all above transactions are need to monitor for Performance.
Regards
Bandla -
Performance Problems with Web Layouts in web interface
Hello Gurus,
We have a a BPS web interface tool which has the following design:
1> A web interface with several tabs
2> Each tab has around 3-4 input layouts which are dependent on each other
3> In all there are 120-140 layouts that the tool uses...
My questions were in term of performance
1> Is there a limit to how many web layouts you can use per page/tab/view or if SAP recommends specific number of web layouts per page/tab/view ?
2> If there is a limitation...our intention was to convert all the display layouts into BW reports so as to increase the performance of the tool....
3> Would like to know the restriction on the number of users who can log into the tool as a specific point of time ? We may have 50-60 minimum using this tool.
I would appreciate your help in this regard.
Thanks in advanceHello Rashmi,
Have you got a chance to look at the performance guide and SAP notes on BPS performance. If not here are the details
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/documents/a1-8-4/performance guide - sap sem bw bps.pdf
Enclosed are the few SAP notes related for improving performance.
358921 - Oracle database parameterization for SEM
459897 - SEM-CPM: Performance when reading transaction data
566713 Required information for the analysis of performance problems
560369 - Proposals BW aggregates for SEM-BPS
180605 - Oracle database parameter settings for BW
124361 - Oracle parameterization (R/3 >= 4.x, Oracle 8.x / 9.x)
358529 - Overview of performance notes
350011 - Technical performance: Using the business content
340246 - Techn. performance: Overview of statistics
417091 - Optimize execution time of planning functions
Some of them are Oracle specific, ignore them if you are not oracle database. Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Praveen
PS.Dont forget to reward points -
SAP ECC 6.0 System Performance
Gentlemen,
Please advise me with the following scenario, which is Iu2019m facing a problem with system performance,
My system configuration is: SAP ECC 6.0
Database System: Oracle 10.2.0.2.0.
Server Configuration: Power 6
Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER6
Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 6
Processor Version: PV_6_Compat
Number Of Processors: 6
Processor Clock Speed: 3503 MHz
CPU Type: 64-bit
Kernel Type: 64-bit
LPAR Info: 2 PRODUCTION
Memory Size: 47104 MB
Good Memory Size: 47104 MB
Platform Firmware level: EL340_039
Firmware Version: IBM,EL340_039
The following Information was generated from TCode: sm51:
SAP Release Information
Application Server SAPPRD_PRD_00
SAP Kernel Information
SAP Kernel : 700_REL
Database Client Library : OCI_101
created in : AIX 2 5 005DD9CD4C00
Support Level : 0
Kernel Patch number : 202
Source ID : 0.202
DBSL Patch No. : 046
ICU Version : 3.0 Unicode Version 4.0.1
libsapu16 Version : 1.0025 Apr 8 2009 16:21:08
Supported Environment
SAP Database Version
700
Database
ORACLE 9.2.0..
ORACLE 10.1.0..
ORACLE 10.2.0..
Operating System
aix 1 5
aix 2 5
aix 3 5
aix 1 6
My active parameter in Tcode : RZ10 as follow:
Parameter Name Parameter value
login/accept_sso2_ticket 1
login/create_sso2_ticket 2
rsau/enable 1
login/failed_user_auto_unlock 0
login/fails_to_user_lock 5
gw/max_sys 2000
gw/max_overflow_size 25000000
rdisp/max_comm_entries 2000
rdisp/tm_max_no 2000
gw/max_conn 2000
rdisp/max_arq 2000
ES/SHM_SEG_COUNT 8192
ES/SHM_USER_COUNT 8192
ES/SHM_SEG_SIZE 2048
ES/TABLE SHM_SEGS
ztta/short_area 4000000
em/global_area_MB 256
zcsa/db_max_buftab 10000
sap/bufdir_entries 10000
enque/table_size 60000
rsdb/obj/large_object_size 35000
rsdb/obj/max_objects 45000
rsdb/obj/buffersize 150000
rdisp/gui_auto_logout 0
login/password_expiration_time 0
rdisp/max_wprun_time 25000
login/multi_login_users CICUSER,TALSAYED,ASALAM
login/disable_multi_gui_login 1
SAPSYSTEMNAME PRD
SAPSYSTEM 0
INSTANCE_NAME DVEBMGS00
DIR_CT_RUN $(DIR_EXE_ROOT)/run
DIR_EXECUTABLE $(DIR_INSTANCE)/exe
PHYS_MEMSIZE 8000
exe/saposcol $(DIR_CT_RUN)/saposcol
rdisp/wp_no_dia 70
rdisp/wp_no_btc 20
exe/icmbnd $(DIR_CT_RUN)/icmbnd
icm/server_port_0 PROT=HTTP,PORT=80$$
ms/server_port_0 PROT=HTTP,PORT=81$$
rdisp/wp_no_enq 1
rdisp/wp_no_vb 2
rdisp/wp_no_vb2 2
rdisp/wp_no_spo 10
abap/buffersize 9900000
zcsa/table_buffer_area 108003328
rtbb/buffer_length 60000
rsdb/cua/buffersize 24000
zcsa/presentation_buffer_area 28166144
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no 2000
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no 1000
rsdb/ntab/entrycount 68500
rsdb/ntab/ftabsize 100000
rsdb/ntab/irbdsize 20000
rsdb/ntab/sntabsize 3995
DIR_ROLL /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_PAGING /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_DATA /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_REORG /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
DIR_TRANS /usr/sap/trans
DIR_TEMP /tmp
DIR_SORTTMP /usr/sap/PRD/DVEBMGS00/data
zcsa/system_language E
zcsa/installed_languages AE
abap/use_paging 0
ztta/roll_first 1024
rdisp/keepalive_timeout 8000
ztta/roll_area 9000960
rdisp/ROLL_SHM 16384
rdisp/ROLL_MAXFS 32768
rdisp/PG_SHM 16384
rdisp/PG_MAXFS 200064
abap/heap_area_dia 2012217344
abap/heap_area_nondia 2012217344
abap/heap_area_total 2012217344
abap/heaplimit 40894464
abap/swap_reserve 20971520
ztta/roll_extension 2101346304
em/initial_size_MB 4092
em/blocksize_KB 4096
em/stat_log_size_MB 20
em/stat_log_timeout 0
login/no_automatic_user_sapstar 0
login/system_client 100
icm/server_port_1 PROT=SMTP,PORT=8025,TIMEOUT=180
rdisp/start_icman TRUE
icm/host_name_full SAPPRD.tmg.dom
install/codepage/appl_server 4102
ipc/shm_psize_10 500000000
ipc/shm_psize_14 0
ipc/shm_psize_18 0
ipc/shm_psize_19 0
ipc/shm_psize_30 -10
ipc/shm_psize_40 500000000
ipc/shm_psize_41 0
ipc/shm_psize_51 -10
ipc/shm_psize_52 -10
ipc/shm_psize_54 -10
ipc/shm_psize_55 -10
ipc/shm_psize_57 -10
ipc/shm_psize_58 -10
I already generated EWA report and I got the following result:
1. Performance Overview PRD
The performance of your system was analyzed with respect to average response times and total workload. We have detected some problems that may impair system performance.
To ensure adequate performance in your core business transactions, you should take corrective action as soon as possible. For further information, please SAP Support.
Rating Check
Performance Evaluation
The following table shows the average response times for various task types:
Task type Dialog Steps Avg. Resp. Time in ms Avg. CPU Time in ms Avg. Wait Time in ms Avg. Load Time in ms Avg. DB Time in ms Avg. GUI Time in ms
DIALOG 212990 1595.2 257.7 31.0 5.0 622.2 136.8
RFC 2904 11876.4 192.1 33.1 1.4 10574.2 0.0
UPDATE 86257 116.1 28.4 2.1 2.9 58.1 0.0
UPDATE2 1100 84.6 16.9 1.3 1.4 48.2 0.0
BATCH 11600 189360.5 46218.1 5.5 3.7 132313.5 0.0
SPOOL 9989 1686.8 37.1 55.6 0.3 49.2 0.0
1.1. Current Workload
The following table lists the number of current users (measured from our workload analysis) in your system.
Users Low Activity Medium Activity High Activity Total Users
Measured in System 162 119 6 287
1.2. Performance Evaluation
The measured times are compared against reference times to provide a rating.
- If the number of dialog steps in an hour is less than 1000 this hour is not considered.
- If the total number of transaction steps is less than 24000, the rating for the task is not performed and a blue line is entered in the table.
The table below shows that a performance problem is expected for the task that is rated YELLOW.
Task Steps Application Server Performance Database Server Performance
Dia 212987
Upd 86257
HTTP 0
Rating Task Time Steps Avg. Response Time (ms) Avg. CPU Time (ms) Avg. Database Time (ms)
Dia 08-09 3726 1343 137 889
Dia 09-10 19990 1003 174 620
Dia 10-11 20603 1747 112 630
Dia 11-12 27934 2437 239 612
Dia 12-13 18921 2737 235 858
Dia 13-14 21579 2163 349 549
Dia 16-17 22529 1134 230 703
Dia 17-18 12189 1709 561 991
Dia 19-20 5840 1550 414 967
Dia 20-21 4951 1294 176 454
The ratings in the table above are determined by comparisons against the reference table below.
If the dialog response times are very poor, it will cause a RED rating for the entire check.
Task Reference for Avg. Response Time (ms) Reference for Avg. DB time (ms)
Dia 1200 600
Upd 2400 1200
HTTP 1200 600
1.3. Transaction Profile Check
The following tables show the response times and the number of dialog steps for the transactions that cause the highest workload in your system. NOTE: A business transaction normally consists of more than one dialog step. As a rough estimate, the actual number of business transactions that are executed in your system is approximately one third of the total dialog steps shown. (Transaction CPIC/RFC is not taken into account.)
1.3.1. Transactions by Total Workload
The following tables list the activities with the highest contribution to the total workload.
WORKLOAD BY TRANSACTION (DIALOG/UPDATE)
Transaction Type Dialog Steps Total Resp. Time in % Avg. Resp. Time in ms Avg. CPU Time in ms Avg. DB Time in ms Avg. GUI Time in ms
Total 299247 100.0 1168.9 191.7 459.6 136.8
ZFIBB DIA 8592 11.1 4522.4 2258.5 633.4 30.1
ZFIRP DIA 6641 7.3 3858.0 1089.7 1162.6 50.0
RECN DIA 11644 6.8 2047.9 129.1 1165.8 202.6
SESSION_MANAGER DIA 8972 5.7 2226.9 80.2 244.2 458.2
ZFICCR DIA 4834 5.2 3775.9 138.4 2535.9 195.6
ZRECPD DIA 8895 4.6 1790.1 85.9 525.3 329.4
FBL3N DIA 10414 4.1 1386.7 109.3 971.8 49.1
ZFIOBC2 DIA 852 3.4 13909.2 2675.7 9302.3 1028.7
ZREOR DIA 2241 3.3 5216.1 2246.2 808.1 357.5
ZFIOB DIA 1176 3.2 9503.7 51.3 8287.0 753.4
38.1% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
WORKLOAD BY TRANSACTION (BATCH/SPOOL)
Transaction Type Dialog Steps Total Resp. Time in % Avg. Resp. Time in ms Avg. CPU Time in ms Avg. DB Time in ms
Total 21492 100.0 102913.8 24939.7 71399.3
SBIE0001 BTC 36 98.7 60613763.4 14848709.4 42408448.0
ZFIPR SPO 448 0.2 7939.6 169.9 387.1
(BATCH) BTC 7368 0.2 478.4 7.5 22.2
ZFIADCA SPO 486 0.1 5733.7 168.6 177.9
RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_DISPATCHING BTC 96 0.1 23895.0 1964.7 21770.3
ZFIJV SPO 309 0.1 6092.5 107.7 89.5
SAPRSLOG BTC 4 0.1 318475.8 69165.0 257824.5
ZRE_GENERATE_COND_RO BTC 5 0.1 250075.0 3336.0 237287.8
ZRE_AUTO_REJECT_OFFER BTC 20 0.1 57062.0 339.0 54977.8
ZRE_TRANSFER_TOCONT_UPL BTC 346 0.0 3161.3 941.6 2327.7
0.6% of the "Total Resp. Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
According to our analysis, the main system load is caused by background jobs.
The EarlyWatch Alert Service can only detect performance problems for dialog, update and RFC response times. This service does not evaluate performance problems for background jobs.
1.3.2. Transactions by DB Load
The following transaction profiles list the transactions that have the greatest share in the database load, sorted by percentage of total database access times.
DATABASE LOAD BY TRANSACTIONS (DIALOG/UPDATE)
Transaction Type Dialog Steps Total DB Time in % Avg. DB Time in ms
Total 299247 100.0 459.6
RECN DIA 11644 9.9 1165.8
ZFICCR DIA 4834 8.9 2535.9
FBL3N DIA 10414 7.4 971.8
ZFIOB DIA 1176 7.1 8287.0
ZRECCR DIA 1504 7.0 6368.3
ZFIOBC2 DIA 852 5.8 9302.3
ZFIRP DIA 6641 5.6 1162.6
ZFIBB DIA 8592 4.0 633.4
ZFIREMTCH DIA 73 3.5 66443.6
ZRECPD DIA 8895 3.4 525.3
45.3% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
DATABASE LOAD BY TRANSACTIONS (BATCH/SPOOL)
Transaction Type Dialog Steps Total DB Time in % Avg. DB Time in ms
Total 21492 100.0 71399.3
SBIE0001 BTC 36 99.5 42408448.0
RSAL_BATCH_TOOL_DISPATCHING BTC 96 0.1 21770.3
ZRE_GENERATE_COND_RO BTC 5 0.1 237287.8
ZRE_AUTO_REJECT_OFFER BTC 20 0.1 54977.8
SAPRSLOG BTC 4 0.1 257824.5
ZRE_TRANSFER_TOCONT_UPL BTC 346 0.1 2327.7
RSPO1043 BTC 4 0.0 143273.5
ZFIPR SPO 448 0.0 387.1
(BATCH) BTC 7368 0.0 22.2
ZFIADCA SPO 486 0.0 177.9
0.3% of the "Total DB Time" in the above table is caused by customer transactions.
Please advice.
Regards,
AhmedGentlemen,
Please advise me with the following scenario, which is Iu2019m facing a problem with system performance,
My system configuration is:
SAP ECC 6.0 , Oracle 10.2.0.2.0 , Kernel Patch number : 202 , DBSL Patch No. : 046
Server Configuration:
Power 6 , Processor Type: PowerPC_POWER6 , Processor Implementation Mode: POWER 6 , Processor Version: PV_6_Compat , Number Of Processors: 6 , Processor Clock Speed: 3503 MHz , CPU Type: 64-bit , Kernel Type: 64-bit , LPAR Info: 2 PRODUCTION , Memory Size: 47104 MB , Good Memory Size: 47104 MB , Platform Firmware level: EL340_039 , Firmware Version: IBM,EL340_039
My active parameter in Tcode : RZ10 as follow:
Parameter Name Parameter value
rsau/enable 1
login/failed_user_auto_unlock 0
login/fails_to_user_lock 5
gw/max_sys 2000
gw/max_overflow_size 25000000
rdisp/max_comm_entries 2000
rdisp/tm_max_no 2000
gw/max_conn 2000
rdisp/max_arq 2000
ES/SHM_SEG_COUNT 8192
ES/SHM_USER_COUNT 8192
ES/SHM_SEG_SIZE 2048
ES/TABLE SHM_SEGS
ztta/short_area 4000000
em/global_area_MB 256
zcsa/db_max_buftab 10000
sap/bufdir_entries 10000
enque/table_size 60000
rsdb/obj/large_object_size 35000
rsdb/obj/max_objects 45000
rsdb/obj/buffersize 150000
rdisp/max_wprun_time 25000
DIR_CT_RUN $(DIR_EXE_ROOT)/run
DIR_EXECUTABLE $(DIR_INSTANCE)/exe
PHYS_MEMSIZE 8000
exe/saposco $(DIR_CT_RUN)/saposcol
rdisp/wp_no_dia 70
rdisp/wp_no_btc 20
exe/icmbnd $(DIR_CT_RUN)/icmbnd
rdisp/wp_no_enq 1
rdisp/wp_no_vb 2
rdisp/wp_no_vb2 2
rdisp/wp_no_spo 10
abap/buffersize 9900000
zcsa/table_buffer_area 108003328
rtbb/buffer_length 60000
rsdb/cua/buffersize 24000
zcsa/presentation_buffer_area 28166144
rdisp/appc_ca_blk_no 2000
rdisp/wp_ca_blk_no 1000
rsdb/ntab/entrycount 68500
rsdb/ntab/ftabsize 100000
rsdb/ntab/irbdsize 20000
rsdb/ntab/sntabsize 3995
abap/use_paging 0
ztta/roll_first 1024
rdisp/keepalive_timeout 8000
ztta/roll_area 9000960
rdisp/ROLL_SHM 16384
rdisp/ROLL_MAXFS 32768
rdisp/PG_SHM 16384
rdisp/PG_MAXFS 200064
abap/heap_area_dia 2012217344
abap/heap_area_nondia 2012217344
abap/heap_area_total 2012217344
abap/heaplimit 40894464
abap/swap_reserve 20971520
ztta/roll_extension 2101346304
em/initial_size_MB 4092
em/blocksize_KB 4096
em/stat_log_size_MB 20
em/stat_log_timeout 0
install/codepage/appl_server 4102
ipc/shm_psize_10 500000000
ipc/shm_psize_14 0
ipc/shm_psize_18 0
ipc/shm_psize_19 0
ipc/shm_psize_30 -10
ipc/shm_psize_40 500000000
ipc/shm_psize_41 0
ipc/shm_psize_51 -10
ipc/shm_psize_52 -10
ipc/shm_psize_54 -10
ipc/shm_psize_55 -10
ipc/shm_psize_57 -10
ipc/shm_psize_58 -10
I already generated EWA report and I got the following result:
Performance Evaluation
The following table shows the average response times for various task types:
Task type Dialog Avg. Resp. Avg. CPU Avg. Wait Avg. Load Avg. DB Avg. GUI
DIALOG 212990 1595.2 257.7 31.0 5.0 622.2 136.8
RFC 2904 11876.4 192.1 33.1 1.4 10574.2 0.0
UPDATE 86257 116.1 28.4 2.1 2.9 58.1 0.0
UPDATE2 1100 84.6 16.9 1.3 1.4 48.2 0.0
BATCH 11600 189360.5 46218.1 5.5 3.7 132313.5 0.0
SPOOL 9989 1686.8 37.1 55.6 0.3 49.2 0.0
1.1. Current Workload
The following table lists the number of current users (measured from our workload analysis) in your system.
Low Activity Medium Activity High Activity Total Users
162 119 6 287
1.2. Performance Evaluation
Task Time Steps Avg. Response Avg. CPU Avg. Database
Dia 08-09 3726 1343 137 889
Dia 09-10 19990 1003 174 620
Dia 10-11 20603 1747 112 630
Dia 11-12 27934 2437 239 612
Dia 12-13 18921 2737 235 858
Dia 13-14 21579 2163 349 549
Dia 16-17 22529 1134 230 703
Dia 17-18 12189 1709 561 991
Dia 19-20 5840 1550 414 967
Dia 20-21 4951 1294 176 454
Task Reference for Avg. Response Time (ms) Reference for Avg. DB time (ms)
Dia 1200 600
Upd 2400 1200
HTTP 1200 600
Please advice.
Regards,
Ahmed -
Database performance: avg. DB time is high
My system is ECC6, MSSQL 2005 64 bit.
I got a ERA report from my solution manager and it showed that we had a performance problem.
Our performance overview is red because of the database performance.
The avg. DB time in ms is 2768890,3. It's very high.
Could you please help us on this issue?
LeoHai,
There might number of reasons for high DB time.
Check your I/O statistics, check your table structure, create Indexes if needed for efficient table access.
You can schedule Optimize statistics in DB13 to get the statistics upto date which helps DB to get the best possible way to access data from your DB.
Analyse the DB buffers and adjust them to get optimal performance. (Should be done by experienced DB admins).
Check the below links....
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/f2/31add7810c11d288ec0000e8200722/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/f2/31add7810c11d288ec0000e8200722/frameset.htm
You can also take help from SAP to analyze your case.
Regards,
Yoganand.V -
Hi all,
Can anybody give me any link from where i can genrate good report for Oracle 9i Db on RHELSir,
I am looking for a that reporting tool where i can compare todays performance or yesterday performance in the form of chart etc so .....
Yes, we can use OEM but in OEM we can't compare two or more different performance overview ....
Edited by: user00726 on Aug 25, 2009 2:28 AM -
How to get values of Dialog Overview node in RZ20
Hello,
In ECC 6.0.
In T-code RZ20 when i clicked on node EC6
it showed me a tree structure with following nodes below EC6.0
System Configuration
\System Buffers
Change & Transport System
File System
Operating System
Performance Overview
System Errors
Now when i expand the tree node of "Performance Overview" another subnode comes up
"Dialog Overview " inside this node i can see
EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\ResponseTime 6585 msec, Red 03.11.2009 , 21:00:03
EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\QueueTime 0 msec , Green 03.11.2009 , 20:59:03
EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\Load+GenTime 19 msec , Green 03.11.2009 , 21:00:05
EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\DBRequestTime 108 msec , Green 03.11.2009 , 21:00:03
EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\UsersLoggedIn 8 , Red 03.11.2009 , 20:57:03
I want to know from which table or cache value 6585 is coming against EC6\IGATESAP07_EC6_02\...\Dialog\ResponseTime...
Is there any function module, or table or anything from where i can get this value since when ever we refresh ,value changes which indicates might be coming from cache.
how to get this value...
Regards,
MayankDialog\ResponseTime 6585
"The dialog response time consists of the period of time from the request of the dialog to the dispatcher through the processing, to the ending of the dialog in the dispatcher and the transfer of the data to the presentation layer"
This is not buffered as far as I know is measured on demand
Read,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/31/d7843b43c8e937e10000000a11402f/content.htm
Regards
Juan -
DB02 - space overview display zero values
Hi Friends,
When I executed DB02 t-code. I got zero values in the fields (Database, Users, Tablespace, Segments)
I got the same with ST04 -> Space Overview.
So, Please tell me the solution for this.
Thanks & RegardsHi Varadhu,
As per your guidance, I tried to check SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_PERFMONITOR job which is scheduled hourly.
It is executed successfully. But, When I checked the Job Logs , I found something wrong in this. I mention this as below:
"Message text"
Job Started
step 001 started (program RSCOLL00, variant, user ID SHISHYA)
Clean_Plan: Cleanup of DB13 Plannings
Clean_Plan: Started by RSDBPREV on server sarswati
Clean_Plan: Cleaning up jobs of system SD1
Function DB6_PLAN_STOP_BATCH_JOB failed with return code = Job error
Clean_Plan: terminated with error
REASON=Job error
Database system not supported
Job finished
I have checked system time zone in the tcode STZAC which is correct.
So, Please tell me how to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards -
Hi Experts, We are getting Exception CX_DBA_ADBC in function unit C_GET_DB_ORA_FILESYSTEM_REQUES ( function group S_ORA_COCKPIT_2 include line 0 ) error in
ST04 > Performance > Wait Event Analysis > Filesystem requests
As a correction we implemented OSS note 1262645 but still the problem persists.
Any advice would be much approeciated.
Regards, Amber SHello,
Check the below link, might help..
Re: Getting exception CX_DBA_ADBC while executing ST04
Regards,
Yoganand.V -
Getting exception CX_DBA_ADBC while executing ST04
While executing ST04 -> Performance -> Wait Event Analysis -> Filesystem Requests
The following error comes
Exception CX_DBA_ADBC in function unit C_GET_DB_ORA_FILESYSTEM_REQUES ( function group S_ORA_COCKPIT_5 include line 0 )
The database is Oracle.
I have seen SAP NOTE 1262645 under which the correction is delivered in the support pack SAPKB700018 but we already are on that support pack level.
Please suggest.Hi Sergo
I already checked SM21 & ST22 . There was nothing there.
When i checked alert log there alos i find nothing.
The error description in note 159510 doesnot match our case.
But when i expanded the pop up Exception CX_DBA_ADBC in function unit C_GET_DB_ORA_FILESYSTEM_REQUES and scrolled further, i saw that it is trying to access a table or view that doesnot exist and it gives SQL Message: ORA-00942: table or view does not exist .
The view in question seems to be SAP$KCBFWAIT .
The method to create or replace this table/view is given in the note you mentioned.
I would try to implement it and see if it solves my problem.
Thanks
Anurag -
Performance Problem with several Database accesses
Hello
We have SAP ERP 2004 running on a Oracle DB 9.x and we face a strange behavior of our system. Sometimes it is very slow. MB51 with 1 Material and 1 Month as selection runs into timeout. But i faced the most significant (or strange) problem using SE16 with table bseg. If i use Company code, one item number and year as a selection, it is very fast. If i put in 2 items numbers instead of one, it takes 15 minutes to show the result. This happens everytime i try it.
For me it looks like the system is doing a sequential read instead of using the proper index. This "wrong index" behavior could be the source of many of our performance problems.
Does anybody have a suggestion for me, how to fix this problem?
Thanks in advance
Hans-Peter> We have SAP ERP 2004 running on a Oracle DB 9.x and we face a strange behavior of our system. Sometimes it is very slow. MB51 with 1 Material and 1 Month as selection runs into timeout. But i faced the most significant (or strange) problem using SE16 with table bseg. If i use Company code, one item number and year as a selection, it is very fast. If i put in 2 items numbers instead of one, it takes 15 minutes to show the result. This happens everytime i try it.
>
> For me it looks like the system is doing a sequential read instead of using the proper index. This "wrong index" behavior could be the source of many of our performance problems.
As mentioned above you can active trace with ST05 to monitor the problematic SQL request. With the explain function, you will see the estimated cost of the request and the used index.
An other way is during the execution of the request --> ST04 -> performance -> Wait event analysis -> Session monitor
If you use the IN option, your request could be very expensive. And in many cases, the reads can only performed with sequential access.
For an overlook of possible indexes for a table, you can use the DB05. To interpret the results : an index is representative when you have numerous distinct values for a few 'rows per generic keys'
Hope this will help you -
Host performance not displayed
Hi,
after installing Additional Management Agent 10.1.0.2 on my servers, performance data for some hosts is not visible (java.lang.NullPointerException in performance overview). Some of the hosts report their performance data, some others do not. All hosts run Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4, and all are members of the same domain.
Even operating system and hardware information is not available on the host's homepage for one of the server.
Has anyone any idea?
Greetings from Germany, Jörg.Dear All,
I have already checked the help file, it is opening properly, and also done to restore the performance assistant by clicking right on the tool bar.
Help me Reward points will be given.
Maybe you are looking for
-
IPod has erased its data, no longer appears in iTunes/deskto
I have switched using my iPod from the Windows system I began with to an iBook G4, but did not reset my factory settings because much of the music on the pod does not exist on my old computer. I recently was adding files to my iPod on the Mac in iTun
-
How can I set the program to automaticaly send recieved email addresses to my address book?
As the question asks, how can I set the program to automatically add new email address from messages to my address book. Other email programs can be set up to do this. If this can't be done in Firefox, why not. It's the best email program otherwise.
-
Hi My oracle db version is 11g R1/AIX5.3 how following plsql code can be re-written for better performance CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE CSCOMMON.POST_SEQ_PROCESS AS -- Declare variables to hold sequenced infomration. pragma autonomous_transactio
-
Will classic be elimated in the future?
just want to know if classic environment will be elimated eventually in the future OSX ? Any official feedback from MAC?
-
How can I type Japanese in inDesign?
Hello, I am using the U.S version of inDesign and trying to put Japanese on my document. However, inDesign can't recoganize Japanese and showing just as squares. Can somebody help? Thank you!