Static Clients Not Getting IP via DHCP -- Solution?

I set up some static maps to client machines on the LAN and thereafter was having some intermittent problems with their getting IP address. Some did, some didn't. I read this thread:
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=660758

The solution posted in the quoted thread above works. Need to create an address group for 0.0.0.0 and open the port. Also, make sure that the static IPs are in the specified address range for DHCP handouts.

Similar Messages

Wireless on 1811W not getting IP via DHCP

What am I doing wrong? The wireless client authenticates to the router, but doesn't get an IP via DHCP? Help??

Hi Jeff,
Just now got the chnace to apply your suggestions and test. Still no go.
Here's the updated config.
Just want the wireless to be an extension of the wired network - no "guest" access required - so no additional DHCP pool/rules to apply.

DHCP via Hyper-V VM, Server2012r2 Hyper-V host, clients not getting IP address

You have to authorize a dhcp server as Britv8 says. That's the only way it'll start dishing out leases. That's standard for Windows DHCP server in an AD Domain.
Also there's 0 reason to mention Hyper-V here. The whole point of virtualization is to do hardware level abstraction.

I recently encountered this. Setup:
Initial setup of the system was at a different location from its final destination, with different network equipment (switches) between the two. No teaming is involved, however.
Set up the system at its final destination, with DHCP via a Hyper-V VM (Server2012r2), Server2012r2 Hyper-V host, physical clients on the lan were not getting IP address.
The physical server box has a 4-port Intel Gigabit ethernet card.
I moved the setup (Hyper-V Virtual Switch manager) so that the interface for the DHCP server VM was isntead using one of two built-in Broadcom adapters.
While this topic seemed promising,
http://community.spiceworks.com/topic/251317-hyper-v-vm-not-leasing-ip-s-dhcp
unfortunately, "fiddling about" was not what I was looking for as possible solution.
My notes for the resolution:
Hyper-V system running...
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Clients not getting DHCP from external server

Hi,
I have a 4402 (version 7.0.235) working with 10 units of 1121 APs connected to it. The WLC is not configured to work in LAG mode. Physical portt #1 is connected to the Main Switch (trunk). I have 3 WLAN mapped to 3 Different VLAN and Everything (security and internal, external DHCP) is working swell...
Now- I have connected Physical port #2 directly to an ADSL Router (giga port), Configured Port 2 as untaggedwith the proper IP details.
I have configured this interface to receive DHCP from the ADSL Router and for some reason, Clients are not getting addresses.
When I assign a Static address to my laptop I get internet access and all is nice. I tried configuring The WLC internal DHCP server (instead of the ADSL router) and that didn't help. It seems like a DHCP problem but I dont understand the source of the problem of think of the solution.
When turning off the proxy settings I noticed that it helped. Is there anything to do with that? The problem was that after a while the other WLANs starting causing DHCP issues as well.
What is supposed to be configured? Any Expert is the House?
I attached a crappy drawing..

Hi Scott,
Thanks for your answer.
So what you are basicly saying is that I have 2 choices: 1 - disable the Proxy option on the WLC and work with external DHCP servers (internal will not work when this is enabled). 2 - Enable the Proxy option and only work with the WLC internal DHCP.
I have installed many WLCs this way, having Different DHCP Servers (external and internal) for multiple WLANs.
What do you think may be different this time? The router that I am using isn't the most expencive but it is providing DHCP to other clients (wired client) with no problems.
Thanks!!!

Clients not getting DHCP in VRF

Good morning -
We have devices in the global routing table (not in a VRF) getting DHCP addresses without issue. The SVI is configured as such:
interface Vlan2301
description BLUE
ip address 172.19.68.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.4.16.222
interface Vlan2512
description RED
vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.217.5.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.4.16.222
Clients in BLUE are getting DHCP but clients in RED are not. If I statically assign an address I have connectivity and can reach the DHCP server (which is also DNS server; with a static IP in VLAN 2512 I can do name resolutions for example).
I am at a bit of a loss. Is there anything special I need to do for VRF IP HELPER-ADDRESS configuration? A capture on my firewall interface shows the DHCP server is trying to reply - it is like the helper-address is not forwarding the dhcp reply (or is not getting it)
11:11:52.915180 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 254, id 17478, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 337)
    10.217.5.1.67 > 10.4.16.222.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Request from xx, length 309, hops 1, xid 0xb53a220c, Flags [none]
          Gateway-IP 10.217.5.1
          Client-Ethernet-Address xx [|bootp]
11:11:52.918761 IP (tos 0x0, ttl 124, id 28096, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 344)
    10.4.16.222.67 > 10.217.5.1.67: BOOTP/DHCP, Reply, length 316, xid 0xb53a220c, Flags [none]
          Your-IP 10.217.5.12
          Server-IP 10.4.16.222
          Gateway-IP 10.217.5.1
          Client-Ethernet-Address xx [|bootp]
Any ideas?

Good morning -
I have a pair of 6513 in a VS40 (VSS quad sup) connected via L3 MEC to a VSS pair of 4500X. Active to Active and Standby to Standby connected in a L3 MEC port-channel that is also a vnet trunk:
(Core)
interface Port-channel5
description Distribution Uplink
no switchport
vnet trunk
ip dhcp snooping limit rate 100
ip address 172.20.68.1 255.255.255.252
ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 XXX
spanning-tree guard root
(4500 Distribution)
interface Port-channel1
description Core Uplink
vnet trunk
ip arp inspection trust
ip address 172.20.68.2 255.255.255.252
ip ospf message-digest-key 1 md5 XXX
The interfaces are all using LACP mode Active inside the channels
On the 4500 we have a global routing table and a vrf. Both have helper addresses pointing to the DHCP server which is extranet service behind the 6513 Core.
interface Vlan2301
description Global Routing Table
ip address 172.19.68.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.4.16.222
interface Vlan2512
description VRF
vrf forwarding RED
ip address 10.217.5.1 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.4.16.222
DHCP for the Global Routing Table subnet works. DHCP for the VRF does not.
What is interesting is if we shut down the link that is connected to the standby 4500 (Te2/1/1) DHCP starts to work for the VRF.
Using <debug ip dhcp server packet detail> at the 4500 here is what I am seeing.
When both links are up and DHCP is failing for the VRF:
Mar 10 20:02:02.419: DHCPD: BOOTREQUEST from 0100.1a6b.3a56.13 forwarded to 10.4.16.222.
Mar 10 20:02:10.473: DHCPD: Reload workspace interface Vlan2512 tableid 3.
Mar 10 20:02:10.473: DHCPD: tableid for 10.217.5.1 on Vlan2512 is 3
Mar 10 20:02:10.474: DHCPD: client's VPN is RED.
Mar 10 20:02:10.474: DHCPD: using received relay info.
When I shut the Te2/1/1 link down in the L3 MEC at the 4500 DHCP starts to work for the VRF RED:
Mar 10 20:04:41.354: DHCPD: BOOTREQUEST from 0100.1a6b.3a56.13 forwarded to 10.4.16.222.
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: Reload workspace interface Port-channel1.2002 tableid 3.
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: tableid for 172.20.68.2 on Port-channel1.2002 is 3
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: client's VPN is .
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: forwarding BOOTREPLY to client 001a.6b3a.5613.
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: no option 125
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: broadcasting BOOTREPLY to client 001a.6b3a.5613.
Mar 10 20:04:41.369: DHCPD: no option 125
Mar 10 20:04:44.808: DHCPD: Reload workspace interface Vlan2512 tableid 3.
Mar 10 20:04:44.808: DHCPD: tableid for 10.217.5.1 on Vlan2512 is 3
Mar 10 20:04:44.808: DHCPD: client's VPN is RED.
It is like there is a bug that is treating the L3 MEC as a L2 MEC when both links are present; or the VNET trunk is not being processed correctly.
Has anyone else used a L3 MEC with a VRF and a DHCP helper with success? Is this a bug?
03.05.01.E is the code we are running on the 4500X-32(SPF+)
This is also with TAC but I thought I would share with the community in case anyone else has a similar environment or if Cisco experts want to comment.

Satellite Pro L300-12H not getting IP from DHCP router via cable

My Vista Premium SP1 laptop is connected via wireless connection to a Buffalo ADSL modem/router model WBMR-G54 which works fine. However, I tried the other day to connect up the LAN card via RJ45 cable to the router and it won't work! I get the message "limited connectivity" and an IP of 169.254.xxx.xxx which suggests it is not getting an IP from the router.
I been on various web sites and tried all sorts of things like unchecking ipv6 on the LAN card properties, turning off DHCP Broadcast flag in the registry (as per micrsoft issue) etc. but to no avail.
Anybody got any suggestions to get it working?
NB: I took the laptop into work and connected it to the Windows 2003 server network and got a DHCP IP straight away!?!

Hi wakefijr,
To be honest, it's still worth checking with your ISP or the router manufacturer because they will be able to guide you through the settings of the router. You're quite right about the 169.254.xxx.xxx IP address, it means that the DHCP server within the router isn't assigning an IP address to the laptop so the laptop is assigning itself an IP address via APIPA.
Short of checking the DHCP router settings, one other thing you could do is disable APIPA and try using the alternate IP configuration, this is how:
* Go to the *Start Menu* and in the *Start Search* box, type in *ncpa.cpl* and hit Enter, this will open up network connections
* Go into the properties of the LAN and properties of IPv4
* Click on the *Alternate Configuration* tab
* You will see that it is set to APIPA, you can change to *User configured* and input an available IP address, the correct subnet mask (most likely 255.255.255.0) and default gateway.
* Click *OK* as many times as you need to save all changes, then reboot with the RJ45 cable connected.
What this will then do is make the laptop try looking for a DHCP server to assign an IP address, but if no DHCP server is assigning an IP address to this laptop then it will assign one that should work on the network.
But really check router configuration as a priority.

SRW2024 not getting IP from dhcp

Hi,
I'm have installed a SRW2024 switch in my home office. I've connected via hyperterminal and changed the ip address mode to "dhcp client". But i'm not getting an ip address from the dhcp server.
Is there something else I must do or setup on the switch? the DHCP server has been running without problem for some time now, all my other devices can get an ip without problems...
Thanks,
Koen

Khan,
The problem of users not getting IP from the DHCP usually happens when 'spanning-tree portfast' is not enabled on access ports. PCs don't wait long enough for DHCP responses and time out.
Can you make sure all the access ports, to which the users are connected to, have spanning tree portfast enabled.
HTH,
Sundar

SCCM client not getting installed on some system (SCCM 2012 SP1)

Hi,
I am new to SCCM. I deployed sccm client via "client push deployment". Client installed on 90% system , but some system are not getting sccm client install. I restarted WMI service and file sharing on those client.
1:- I check the ccmsetup.log file on one of the system.
<![LOG[File C:\WINDOWS\ccmsetup\{1AF71F68-6089-4211-ADDC-06DF40606141}\client.msi installation succeeded.]LOG]!><time="11:31:28.071-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="1"
thread="3440" file="msiutil.cpp:831">
<![LOG[No client language changes are detected per current client.msi.]LOG]!><time="11:31:28.071-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="0" thread="3440" file="ccmsetup.cpp:8140">
<![LOG[Successfully deleted the ccmsetup service]LOG]!><time="11:31:34.176-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="1" thread="3440" file="ccmsetup.cpp:3320">
<![LOG[Sending Fallback Status Point message to 'IN-SCCM.DOMAIN.COM', STATEID='400'.]LOG]!><time="11:31:34.176-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="1" thread="3440"
file="ccmsetup.cpp:9421">
<![LOG[Params to send FSP message '5.0.7804.1000 Deployment [MP] IN-SCCM.domain.com']LOG]!><time="11:31:34.176-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="0" thread="3440"
file="ccmsetup.cpp:9552">
<![LOG[State message with TopicType 800 and TopicId {87645077-E6A4-4379-A76A-BE17C536F429} has been sent to the FSP]LOG]!><time="11:31:34.300-330" date="08-19-2014" component="FSPStateMessage" context="" type="1"
thread="3440" file="fsputillib.cpp:752">
<![LOG[Deleted file C:\WINDOWS\ccmsetup\ccmsetup.xml]LOG]!><time="11:31:34.300-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="1" thread="1888" file="ccmsetup.cpp:9156">
<![LOG[CcmSetup is exiting with return code 0]LOG]!><time="11:31:34.316-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ccmsetup" context="" type="1" thread="1888" file="ccmsetup.cpp:10540">
2:- I checked SMSAdminUI.log ,
[53, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[36, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[56, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[61, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[64, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[49, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
[66, PID:1936][08/19/2014 12:24:50] :[IN-SCCM.domain.com] : The request failed with HTTP status 503: Server Error.
3:- CcmExec.log:-
<![LOG[*** Keep the system awake]LOG]!><time="11:38:09.505-330" date="08-19-2014" component="CcmExec" context="" type="1" thread="3232" file="powerstatemanager.cpp:1057">
<![LOG[*** System is now free to go to sleep]LOG]!><time="11:38:10.255-330" date="08-19-2014" component="CcmExec" context="" type="1" thread="3232" file="powerstatemanager.cpp:1068">
<![LOG[Could not load logging configuration for component FileSystemFile. Using default values.]LOG]!><time="11:51:53.939-330" date="08-19-2014" component="CcmExec" context="" type="2" thread="1268"
file="stdlogging.cpp:480">
Can anyone suggest , which log file i have to check more.

Hi,
I checked locationservices.log and got the result.
<![LOG[Raising event:
instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
   ClientID = "GUID:4B37DF71-4647-424F-8E4F-E011E38F0970";
   DateTime = "20140819060312.831000+000";
   HostName = "IN-SCCM.domain.com";
   HRESULT = "0x00000000";
   ProcessID = 3040;
   StatusCode = 0;
   ThreadID = 1784;
]LOG]!><time="11:33:12.831-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="event.cpp:706">
<![LOG[Persisting the management point authentication information in WMI]LOG]!><time="11:33:12.862-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lssecurity.cpp:921">
<![LOG[Persisted Management Point Authentication Information locally]LOG]!><time="11:33:12.878-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lssecurity.cpp:928">
<![LOG[Current AD site of machine is India]LOG]!><time="11:33:12.925-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:746">
<![LOG[MPLIST requests are throttled for 00:04:38]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.034-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="2" thread="3240" file="lssecurity.cpp:4528">
<![LOG[Current AD site of machine is India]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.065-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:746">
<![LOG[Updating portal information.]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.190-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="3612" file="lssecurity.cpp:4103">
<![LOG[Updated FSP 'IN-SCCM.domain.com' from AD to local.]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.424-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:6155">
<![LOG[Received reply of type PortalCertificateReply]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.752-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="3612" file="replylocationsendpoint.cpp:302">
<![LOG[The reply from location manager contains 1 certificates]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.752-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="3612" file="lsportalutils.cpp:93">
<![LOG[Updating portal certificates]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.752-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="3612" file="lssecurity.cpp:4143">
<![LOG[Successfully created context from the raw certificate.]LOG]!><time="11:33:13.783-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="3612" file="lssecurity.cpp:4247">
<![LOG[Executing Task LSRefreshLocationsTask]LOG]!><time="12:33:10.868-330" date="08-19-2014" component="LocationServices" context="" type="1" thread="428" file="scheduledcleanupendpoint.cpp:116">
and the ClientLocation.log file..
<![LOG[Domain joined client is in Intranet]LOG]!><time="11:32:50.927-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="lsad.cpp:896">
<![LOG[Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: IN-SCCM.domain.com (7804) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities>]LOG]!><time="11:32:51.020-330"
date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="lsad.cpp:5909">
<![LOG[Assigned MP changed from <IN-SCCM.domain.com> to <IN-SCCM.domain.com>.]LOG]!><time="11:32:51.020-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="lsad.cpp:1364">
<![LOG[Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: IN-SCCM.domain.com (7804) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities>]LOG]!><time="11:32:51.364-330"
date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="lsad.cpp:5909">
<![LOG[Assigned MP changed from <IN-SCCM.domain.com> to <IN-SCCM.domain.com>.]LOG]!><time="11:32:51.379-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="336" file="lsad.cpp:1364">
<![LOG[Current AD forest name is domain.com, domain name is domain.com]LOG]!><time="11:33:09.974-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:818">
<![LOG[Domain joined client is in Intranet]LOG]!><time="11:33:09.974-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:896">
<![LOG[Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: IN-SCCM.domain.com (7804) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities>]LOG]!><time="11:33:10.302-330"
date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:5909">
<![LOG[Assigned MP changed from <IN-SCCM.domain.com> to <IN-SCCM.domain.com>.]LOG]!><time="11:33:10.349-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:1364">
<![LOG[Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: IN-SCCM.domain.com (7804) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities>]LOG]!><time="11:33:11.332-330"
date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:5909">
<![LOG[Assigned MP changed from <IN-SCCM.domain.com> to <IN-SCCM.domain.com>.]LOG]!><time="11:33:11.363-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientLocation" context="" type="1" thread="1784" file="lsad.cpp:1364">
In ClientLocation.log file.. Assigned MP is changed from <IN-SCCM.domain.com> to <IN-SCCM.domain.com> again and again..
and ClientIDManagerStartup.log contains..
<![LOG[[RegTask] - Client is already registered. Exiting.]LOG]!><time="11:32:47.351-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="regtask.cpp:793">
<![LOG[Evaluated SMBIOS (encoded): ]LOG]!><time="11:32:48.460-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="smbiosident.cpp:184">
<![LOG[SMBIOS unchanged]LOG]!><time="11:32:48.460-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:671">
<![LOG[SID unchanged]LOG]!><time="11:32:48.460-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:688">
<![LOG[HWID unchanged]LOG]!><time="11:32:49.553-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:705">
<![LOG[GetSystemEnclosureChassisInfo: IsFixed=FALSE, IsLaptop=FALSE]LOG]!><time="11:32:49.600-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:215">
<![LOG[Windows To Go requires a minimum operating system of Windows 8]LOG]!><time="11:32:49.678-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="util.cpp:2902">
<![LOG[Computed HardwareID=2:2AF3437D810085AF58274221194EE64E5365F4E2
   Win32_SystemEnclosure.SerialNumber=<empty>
   Win32_SystemEnclosure.SMBIOSAssetTag=<empty>
   Win32_BaseBoard.SerialNumber=BTCR71400LLA
   Win32_BIOS.SerialNumber=
   Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration.MACAddress=00:19:D1:78:8A:1D]LOG]!><time="11:32:49.678-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:476">
<![LOG[Persisted hardware IDs in CCM_ClientIdentificationInformation=@:
   HardwareID1=2:2AF3437D810085AF58274221194EE64E5365F4E2
   HardwareID2=3AD70278013A0076]LOG]!><time="11:32:49.678-330" date="08-19-2014" component="ClientIDManagerStartup" context="" type="1" thread="1504" file="ccmid.cpp:575">
Its showing client is already registered.. but its not showing in SCCM console.
Any idea

Clients not receiving addresses from DHCP

I have a Cisco 2811 router and have configured it to be a DHCP server at a remote site. It seems like it should be pretty straight forward to configure DHCP. Apparently I'm missing something because I can't get clients to receive an address. Below are the applicable parts of the config. I also have tried associating the DHCP pool with the Claims vrf and that did not work either.
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.30.0 10.10.30.99
ip dhcp excluded-address 10.10.30.201 10.10.30.255
ip dhcp pool Claims_Office
   network 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0
   domain-name fmi.com
   default-router 10.10.30.253
   dns-server 10.10.10.191
   lease 7
interface FastEthernet0/0
description Claims Office
vrf forwarding Claims
ip address 10.10.30.253 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
no mop enabled
interface FastEthernet0/0/0.1205
description Claims Office
vrf forwarding Claims
encapsulation dot1Q 1205
ip address 192.168.103.2 255.255.255.252

Unfortunately that didn't work. Here is the output before:
Pool Claims_Office :
Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
Total addresses                : 254
Leased addresses               : 0
Pending event                  : none
1 subnet is currently in the pool :
Current index        IP address range                    Leased addresses
10.10.30.1           10.10.30.1       - 10.10.30.254      0
And after:
Pool Claims_Office :
Utilization mark (high/low)    : 100 / 0
Subnet size (first/next)       : 0 / 0
Total addresses                : 254
Leased addresses               : 0
Pending event                  : none
1 subnet is currently in the pool :
Current index        IP address range                    Leased addresses
10.10.30.1           10.10.30.1       - 10.10.30.254      0
What I want is for it to assign addresses from 10.10.30.100-199

SCCM 2012 Clients not getting applications...

Hi
we have windows 7 clients getting applications deployments through SCCM 2012.
it was working fine...suddenly couple of clients on the particular collection not getting the applications and nothing is displayed on the software center.
verified the Site connections and re-pushed the policyes manually through config manager. restarted sms host agent service...still nothing is working out
getting "Policy does not yet exist on the client" in execmgr.log & CAS.log
where could be the issue? please help
thanks
ananth

I realize that this is an old forum post but in my search to resolve a similar policy application issue I stumbled across it and noticed that anan2k's last question wasn't answered (and I can help). First of all you can check the custom client/user configuration
in the Administration Node. By default SCCM creates a Default Client Settings and sets a priority of 10,000 though this is not deployed by default.
The policy polling interval is actually configured as one of the policies. When you create and deploy a custom client device policy you can select Client Policy as one of the custom settings and within this setting you can establish the policy polling schedule.
I have mine set to 30 minutes which may be a bit high but it generally worked for my environment.
I hope this helps a little bit though I imagine by now that you found the settings or resolved your issue. If you found a solution please post it as I am plagued by policy not applying to my clients.
Thanks again,
Chris Bolton

Ap not getting IP forn dhcp server

I have a 2504 WLC and 1042 ap's. Everything worked great in my test enviroment (of course). Now when I want to deploy the wireless, the ap's are not getting and ip for the windows dhcp server.
I have option 43 configured in dhcp, sub option 241>ip address of the controller
I have my A record in dns, cisco-capwap-controller.
*Mar 1 00:03:17.050: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
Not in Bound state.
*Mar 1 00:03:27.050: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
*Mar 1 00:03:27.054: %CAPWAP-3-DHCP_RENEW: Could not discover WLC using DHCP IP. Renewing DHCP IP.
*Mar 1 00:03:37.054: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
*Mar 1 00:03:47.054: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
*Mar 1 00:03:57.054: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
*Mar 1 00:04:07.054: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Not sending discovery request AP does not have an Ip !!
Not in Bound state.
TIA,
Eric

Hello Eric,
As per your query i can suggest you the following solution-
You need to connect the AP with the switch for power. The dhcp proxy is really not needed. Another thing you can do is unplug the WLC from your switch, then make sure your APs are clean (wiped) then plug the APs into the switch and console into one of them and watch the boot up process to make sure that they are at least requesting an IP address. If they can request an IP successfully then your dhcp problem has something to do with how you have your WLC set up.
Hope this will help you.

Not getting IP from DHCP on 2950

Dear all,
access switch is connected to base switch and base switch is connected to DHCP server, however users are connected to access switch are not getting IP address. Hence i would like to know the solution from experts.
I remember there is a command in CATOS "set port host" by this way we can enhance port to get IP quickly..if there is any command similiar in IOS?
Your assistance will be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Khan.

Khan,
The problem of users not getting IP from the DHCP usually happens when 'spanning-tree portfast' is not enabled on access ports. PCs don't wait long enough for DHCP responses and time out.
Can you make sure all the access ports, to which the users are connected to, have spanning tree portfast enabled.
HTH,
Sundar

LAN was down ie Users are not getting ip from DHCP server after enabling DHCP snooping

Hi All ,
Enclosed file has network connectivity diagram.
1. L3 vlan's ie 2,3,4,5 and 6 are configured on ACC-CR1 and ACC-CR2.
2.Trunk is configured between Core switches ( CR1 and CR2) and access switches .VTP mode is transparent on all switches.L2 vlans are configured on all access switches.
3.DHCP is server is located at different location and is reachable over MPLS.
Without enabling dhcp snooping , users connected to access switches (Sw1,sw2,sw3 and Sw4 ) are getting ip address from DHCP server without any problem and everything is working fine.
But users connected to Sw3 and Sw4 are getting ip address from rouge DHCP server which is not pingable from any one of the switch.
So we have configured DHCP snooping for all vlan's on CR1 , CR2 , SW3 and SW4 and "trusted uplink ports" which are connected to WAN routers from CR1 and CR2 and also "trusted uplink ports " of Sw3 and Sw4 which are connected to CR1 and CR2.
As soon we have enabled DHCP snooping and trusted respective uplink ports , users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server and even users connected to Sw1 and SW2 are facing same issue.
Note : DHCP snooping is not configured on SW1 and SW2.
Why users are not getting ip address from remote DHCP server as soon as we enabled dhcp snooping on Core switches and two access switches ie sw3 and sw4 ? what could have caused DHCP packets to be dropped ? Any idea would be appreciated .

Hi,
as you say: " HSRP is configured between CR1 and CR2 and Vlans are active on CR1" does it mean there are L3 intrefaces configured in each VLAN on your CR switches and ip hepler-address pointing to the remote DHCP server is configured on each of them?
I know it's difficult in a productive environment but IMHO you need to find out where are the DHCP offers dropped.
Either by enabling DHCP debugging or by capturing packets via Wireshark, e.g.
Best regards,
Milan

Cisco ISE 1.2, Clients not getting IP address in closed mode

Hello, I am running closed mode on my switchports. I have an issue where some clients come in in the morning, try to login, and will not get network access. I see that this is because they do not get an IP address. I am using MAB for authentication currently. They appear to MAB correctly and get Authorized in ISE, but they do not get an IP. Therefore, they also do not get the DACL of permit ANY. It's like the port gets de-authenticated during the night. Usually when the machine is rebooted it will come up with an IP address. Here is my switchport config...
switchport access vlan 32
switchport mode access
switchport voice vlan 64
logging event link-status
authentication event fail action next-method
authentication event server dead action authorize vlan 32
authentication event server dead action authorize voice
authentication event server alive action reinitialize
authentication host-mode multi-auth
authentication order mab dot1x
authentication priority dot1x mab
authentication port-control auto
authentication periodic
authentication timer restart 600
authentication timer reauthenticate 7200
authentication violation restrict
mab
dot1x pae authenticator
dot1x timeout quiet-period 300
dot1x timeout tx-period 10
dot1x timeout ratelimit-period 300
dot1x timeout held-period 300
service-policy input QoS-Input-Policy
service-policy output QoS-Host-Port-Output-Policy
end

Thanks, here is the requested output of an Unauthorized client. I had to configure authentication open so they could still get access...
SJ5051IDF1#show authen sess int g2/20 d
Interface: GigabitEthernet2/20
MAC Address: d4be.d94f.ab92
IPv6 Address: Unknown
IPv4 Address: 10.42.32.109
User-Name: D4-BE-D9-4F-AB-92
Status: Unauthorized
Domain: DATA
Oper host mode: multi-auth
Oper control dir: both
Session timeout: N/A
Common Session ID: 0A2A000B000034E367D4B998
Acct Session ID: Unknown
Handle: 0x21000508
Current Policy: POLICY_Gi2/20
Local Policies:
Template: DEFAULT_LINKSEC_POLICY_SHOULD_SECURE (priority 150)
Security Policy: Should Secure
Security Status: Link Unsecure
Method status list:
Method State
mab Authc Success
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#show ip access int g2/20
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#show access-list int g2/20
^
% Invalid input detected at '^' marker.
SJ5051IDF1#show access-list ?
<1-2799> ACL number
WORD ACL name
ipc Show access-list config download info
rate-limit Show rate-limit access lists
| Output modifiers
<cr>
SJ5051IDF1#show access-list g2/20
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#
SJ5051IDF1#

Remittance Advice not getting triggered via F110

Hi all,
I am trying to generate the Remittance advice form via F110, But the form is not getting triggered.
The form name is maintained in the FBZP Paying company codes config.
I have maintained the vairant for the F110 run. The log does not show any errors once i run the Printout.
I am able to generate the form when use program RFFOAVIS_FPAYM in SE38 with the same variant.
Could anyone tell me how to generate the form directly from F110?
Regards,
M.G

Q1: I am getting the same issue with RFFOAVIS. I am able to print the remittance advice via se38, but not from F110. What did you do to fix the problem.
Q2: I created vendor in a comp code and run F110 and then RFFOAVIS to print the remittance - it was in a different format, but when I extended the vendor to another company code and run F110 and RFFOAVIS, the layout was different
Q3: The address on the bottom of the remittance advice is wrong. Expected address is the company code result. Please advice
Thanks

Static Clients Not Getting IP via DHCP -- Solution?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for